Subtype-dependent regulation of Gβγ signalling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transmit information to the cell interior by transducing external signals to heterotrimeric G protein subunits, Gα and Gβγ subunits, localized on the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane. Though the initial focus was mainly on Gα-mediated events, Gβγ subunits were later identified as major contributors to GPCR-G protein signalling. A broad functional array of Gβγ signalling has recently been attributed to Gβ and Gγ subtype diversity, comprising 5 Gβ and 12 Gγ subtypes, respectively. In addition to displaying selectivity towards each other to form the Gβγ dimer, numerous studies have identified preferences of distinct Gβγ combinations for specific GPCRs, Gα subtypes and effector molecules. Importantly, Gβ and Gγ subtype-dependent regulation of downstream effectors, representing a diverse range of signalling pathways and physiological functions have been found. Here, we review the literature on the repercussions of Gβ and Gγ subtype diversity on direct and indirect regulation of GPCR/G protein signalling events and their physiological outcomes. Our discussion additionally provides perspective in understanding the intricacies underlying molecular regulation of subtype-specific roles of Gβγ signalling and associated diseases.     

The PH domain of Ras-GAP is sufficient forin Vitro binding toβγ subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins

Summary 1. The noncatalytic domain of Ras-GAP can affect signaling through G protein-coupled receptors by a poorly understood mechanism. 2. In this study, fusion proteins containing elements of the noncatalytic domain ofras-GAP were examined for their ability to bindβγ subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins and phosphotyrosine-containing polypeptides. 3. Our results demonstrate that purifiedβγ dimers associated with bacterially expressed GAP proteins and that this association does not require SH2 or SH3 domains but is dependent on the presence of the GAP pleckstrin-homology (PH) domain. In contrast, only the SH2 domains are necessary for binding to tyrosine phosphorylated proteins. 4. These findings raise the possibility that heterotrimeric G proteins might affect functioning ofras-like proteins throughβγ subunits acting on their regulatory molecules.     

Binding of histamine to the H1 receptor—a molecular dynamics study

Binding of histamine to the G-protein coupled histamine H₁ receptor plays an important role in the context of allergic reactions; however, no crystal structure of the resulting complex is available yet. To deduce the histamine binding site, we performed unbiased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on a microsecond time scale, which allowed to monitor one binding event, in which particularly the residues of the extracellular loop 2 were involved in the initial recognition process. The final histamine binding pose in the orthosteric pocket is characterized by interactions with Asp107^3.32, Tyr108^3.33, Thr194^5.43, Asn198^5.46, Trp428^6.48, Tyr431^6.51, Phe432^6.52, and Phe435^6.55, which is in agreement with existing mutational data. The conformational stability of the obtained complex structure was subsequently confirmed in 2 μs equilibrium MD simulations, and a metadynamics simulation proved that the detected binding site represents an energy minimum. A complementary investigation of a D107A mutant, which has experimentally been shown to abolish ligand binding, revealed that this exchange results in a significantly weaker interaction and enhanced ligand dynamics. This finding underlines the importance of the electrostatic interaction between the histamine ammonium group and the side chain of Asp107^3.32 for histamine binding.     

Inhibition of the Ethanol-induced Potentiation of α1 Glycine Receptor by a Small Peptide That Interferes with Gβγ Binding

Previous studies indicate that ethanol can modulate glycine receptors (GlyR), in part, through Gβγ interaction with basic residues in the intracellular loop. In this study, we show that a seven-amino acid peptide (RQH_C7), which has the primary structure of a motif in the large intracellular loop of GlyR (GlyR-IL), was able to inhibit the ethanol-elicited potentiation of this channel from 47 ± 2 to 16 ± 4%, without interfering with the effect of Gβγ on GIRK (G protein activated inwardly rectifying potassium channel) activation. RQH_C7 displayed a concentration-dependent effect on ethanol action in evoked and synaptic currents. A fragment of GlyR-IL without the basic amino acids did not interact with Gβγ or inhibit ethanol potentiation of GlyR. In silico analysis using docking and molecular dynamics allowed to identify a region of ∼350Ų involving aspartic acids 186, 228, and 246 in Gβγ where we propose that RQH_C7 binds and exerts its blocking action on the effect of ethanol in GlyR.     

Direct-reversible binding of small molecules to G protein βγ subunits

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) composed of three subunits α, β, γ mediate activation of multiple intracellular signaling cascades initiated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Previously our laboratory identified small molecules that bind to Gβγ and interfere with or enhance binding of select effectors with Gβγ. To understand the molecular mechanisms of selectivity and assess binding of compounds to Gβγ, we used biophysical and biochemical approaches to directly monitor small molecule binding to Gβγ. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis indicated that multiple compounds bound directly to Gβγ with affinities in the high nanomolar to low micromolar range but with surprisingly slow on and off rate kinetics. While the k(off) was slow for most of the compounds in physiological buffers, they could be removed from Gβγ with mild chaotropic salts or mildly dissociating collision energy in a mass-spectrometer indicating that compound-Gβγ interactions were non-covalent. Finally, at concentrations used to observe maximal biological effects the stoichiometry of binding was 1:1. The results from this study show that small molecule modulation of Gβγ-effector interactions is by specific direct non-covalent and reversible binding of small molecules to Gβγ. This is highly relevant to development of Gβγ targeting as a therapeutic approach since reversible, direct binding is a prerequisite for drug development and important for specificity.     

A family of G protein βγ subunits translocate reversibly from the plasma membrane to endomembranes on receptor activation

The present model of G protein activation by G protein-coupled receptors exclusively localizes their activation and function to the plasma membrane (PM). Observation of the spatiotemporal response of G protein subunits in a living cell to receptor activation showed that 6 of the 12 members of the G protein gamma subunit family translocate specifically from the PM to endomembranes. The gamma subunits translocate as betagamma complexes, whereas the alpha subunit is retained on the PM. Depending on the gamma subunit, translocation occurs predominantly to the Golgi complex or the endoplasmic reticulum. The rate of translocation also varies with the gamma subunit type. Different gamma subunits, thus, confer distinct spatiotemporal properties to translocation. A striking relationship exists between the amino acid sequences of various gamma subunits and their translocation properties. gamma subunits with similar translocation properties are more closely related to each other. Consistent with this relationship, introducing residues conserved in translocating subunits into a non-translocating subunit results in a gain of function. Inhibitors of vesicle-mediated trafficking and palmitoylation suggest that translocation is diffusion-mediated and controlled by acylation similar to the shuttling of G protein subunits (Chisari, M., Saini, D. K., Kalyanaraman, V., and Gautam, N. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 24092-24098). These results suggest that the continual testing of cytosolic surfaces of cell membranes by G protein subunits facilitates an activated cell surface receptor to direct potentially active G protein betagamma subunits to intracellular membranes.     

β1-Adrenergic receptor downregulates the expression of cyclooxygenase-2

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the generation of prostanoids, and is thus one of the key players in the inflammatory process. Contrary to the constitutively expressed isoform COX-1, the expression of COX-2 is rapidly and transiently upregulated following pathological stimuli but little is known about pathways that mediate its degradation. Here we show that co-expression of COX-2 together with the β₁ adrenergic receptor (β₁AR) specifically lowers the expression of COX-2 in a dose-dependent manner. We further find that stimulation of the receptor for prolonged periods of time does not reverse the β₁AR-induced decrease in COX-2, suggesting that this effect does not occur via classical β₁-mediated signaling pathways. Rather we find that the half-life of COX-2 is significantly decreased in the presence of β₁AR and that inhibition of the proteasome reverses the effect of the receptor on COX-2. Together these findings ascribe a new role for β₁AR in the downregulation of COX-2.     

Contribution of endogenous G-protein-coupled receptor kinases to Ser129 phosphorylation of α-synuclein in HEK293 cells

The majority of α-synuclein (αS) deposited in Lewy bodies, the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease (PD), is phosphorylated at serine 129 (Ser129). Ser129 phosphorylation of αS has been demonstrated to enhance the αS toxicity to dopaminergic neurons in a Drosophila model of PD. Phosphorylation of αS at Ser129 seems to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of PD. Here, we assessed the contribution of ubiquitously expressing members of the G-protein-coupled receptor kinase family (GRK2, GRK3, GRK5, and GRK6) to Ser129 phosphorylation of αS in HEK293 cells. To selectively reduce the endogenous expression of each member of the GRK family in cells, we used small interfering RNAs. Knockdown of GRK3 or GRK6 significantly decreased Ser129 phosphorylation of αS; however, knockdown of GRK2 or GRK5 did not decrease αS phosphorylation. The results indicate that endogenous GRK3 and GRK6, but not GRK2 or GRK5, contribute to Ser129 phosphorylation of αS in HEK293 cells.     

Association of the subunits of the calcium-independent receptor of α-latrotoxin

CIRL-1 also called latrophilin 1 or CL belongs to the family of adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). As all members of adhesion GPSR family CIRL-1 consists of two heterologous subunits, extracellular hydrophilic p120 and heptahelical membrane protein p85. Both CIRL-1 subunits are encoded by one gene but as a result of intracellular proteolysis of precursor, mature receptor has two-subunit structure. It was also shown that a minor portion of the CIRL-1 receptor complexes dissociates, producing the soluble receptor ectodomain, and this dissociation is due to the second cleavage at the site between the site of primary proteolysis and the first transmembrane domain. Recently model of independent localization p120 and p85 on the cell surface was proposed. In this article we evaluated the amount of p120-p85 complex still presented on the cellular membrane and confirmed that on cell surface major amount of mature CIRL-1 presented as a p120-p85 subunit complex.     

Pasteurella multocida toxin activates Gβγ dimers of heterotrimeric G proteins

The mitogenic Pasteurella multocida toxin (PMT) is a major virulence factor of P. multocida, which causes Pasteurellosis in man and animals. The toxin activates the small GTPase RhoA, the MAP kinase ERK and STAT proteins via the stimulation of members of two G protein families, G_q and G_12/13. PMT action also results in an increase in inositol phosphates, which is due to the stimulation of PLCβ via Gα_q. Recent studies indicate that PMT additionally activates Gα_i to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. Here we show that PMT acts not only via Gα but also through Gβγ signaling. Activation of Gβγ by PMT causes stimulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) γ and formation of phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP₃) as indicated by the recruitment of a PIP₃-binding pleckstrin homology (PH) domain-containing protein to the plasma membrane. Moreover, it is demonstrated that Gβγ is necessary for PMT-induced signaling via Gα. Mutants of Gα_q incapable of binding or releasing Gβγ are not activated by PMT. Similarly, sequestration of Gβγ inhibits PMT-induced Gα-signaling.     

Binding of β-endorphin and its fragments to the nonopiod receptor of murine peritoneal macrophages

The tritium-labeled selective agonist of the nonopioid β-endorphin receptor the decapeptide immunorphin ([³H]SLTCLVKGFY) with a specific activity of 24 Ci/mmol was prepared. It was shown that [³H]immunorphin binds with a high affinity to the non-opioid β-endorphin receptor of mouse peritoneal macrophages (K _d 2.4 ± 0.1 nM). The specific binding of [³H]immunorphin to macrophages was inhibited by unlabeled β-endorphin (K _i of the [³H]immunorphin-receptor complex 2.9 ± 0.2 nM) and was not inhibited by unlabeled naloxone, α-endorphin, γ-endorphin, and [Met⁵]enkephalin (K _i > 10 μM). Thirty fragments of β-endorphin were synthesized, and their ability to inhibit the specific binding of [³H]immunorphin to macrophages was studied. It was found that the shortest peptide having practically the same inhibitory activity as β-endorphin is its fragment 12–19 (K _i 3.1 ± 0.3 nM).     

Arrangement of Kv1 α subunits dictates sensitivity to tetraethylammonium

Shaker-related Kv1 channels contain four channel-forming α subunits. Subfamily member Kv1.1 often occurs oligomerized with Kv1.2 α subunits in synaptic membranes, and so information was sought on the influence of their positions within tetramers on the channels’ properties. Kv1.1 and 1.2 α genes were tandem linked in various arrangements, followed by expression as single-chain proteins in mammalian cells. As some concatenations reported previously seemed not to reliably position Kv1 subunits in their assemblies, the identity of expressed channels was methodically evaluated. Surface protein, isolated by biotinylation of intact transiently transfected HEK-293 cells, gave Kv1.1/1.2 reactivity on immunoblots with electrophoretic mobilities corresponding to full-length concatenated tetramers. There was no evidence of protein degradation, indicating that concatemers were delivered intact to the plasmalemma. Constructs with like genes adjacent (Kv1.1-1.1-1.2-1.2 or Kv1.2-1.2-1.1-1.1) yielded delayed-rectifying, voltage-dependent K⁺ currents with activation parameters and inactivation kinetics slightly different from the diagonally positioned genes (Kv1.1-1.2-1.1-1.2 or 1.2–1.1-1.2-1.1). Pore-blocking petidergic toxins, α dendrotoxin, agitoxin-1, tityustoxin-Kα, and kaliotoxin, were unable to distinguish between the adjacent and diagonal concatamers. Unprecedentedly, external application of the pore-blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA) differentially inhibited the adjacent versus diagonal subunit arrangements, with diagonal constructs having enhanced susceptibility. Concatenation did not directly alter the sensitivities of homomeric Kv1.1 or 1.2 channels to TEA or the toxins. TEA inhibition of currents generated by channels made up from dimers (Kv1.1-1.2 and/or Kv1.2-1.1) was similar to the adjacently arranged constructs. These collective findings indicate that assembly of α subunits can be directed by this optimized concatenation, and that subunit arrangement in heteromeric Kv channels affects TEA affinity.     

Regulation of G-Protein Signaling by RKTG via Sequestration of the Gβγ Subunit to the Golgi Apparatus

Upon ligand binding, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) impart the signal to heterotrimeric G proteins composed of α, β, and γ subunits, leading to dissociation of the Gα subunit from the Gβγ subunit. While the Gα subunit is imperative for downstream signaling, the Gβγ subunit, in its own right, mediates a variety of cellular responses such as GPCR desensitization via recruiting GRK to the plasma membrane and AKT stimulation. Here we report a mode of spatial regulation of the Gβγ subunit through alteration in subcellular compartmentation. RKTG (Raf kinase trapping to Golgi apparatus) is a newly characterized membrane protein specifically localized at the Golgi apparatus. The N terminus of RKTG interacts with Gβ and tethers Gβγ to the Golgi apparatus. Overexpression of RKTG impedes the interaction of Gβγ with GRK2, abrogates the ligand-induced change of subcellular distribution of GRK2, reduces isoproterenol-stimulated phosphorylation of the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), and alters β2AR desensitization. In addition, RKTG inhibits Gβγ- and ligand-mediated AKT phosphorylation that is enhanced in cells with downregulation of RKTG. Silencing of RKTG also alters GRK2 internalization and compromises ligand-induced Gβ translocation to the Golgi apparatus. Taken together, our results reveal that RKTG can modulate GPCR signaling through sequestering Gβγ to the Golgi apparatus and thereby attenuating the functions of Gβγ.Heterotrimeric G proteins are composed of distinct Gα, β, and γ subunits which relay extracellular signals from heptahelical G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to downstream effectors (16, 25, 30). Gα binds Gβγ when Gα is bound with GDP but dissociates from Gβγ after GDP is replaced with GTP upon activation of GPCRs by extracellular ligand (25). Under physiologic conditions, the Gβ and Gγ subunits form a dimer in which the two subunits are not separable (10, 30). Although Gα is the primary protein that transmits the signal of GPCRs to specific intracellular effectors, such as adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase C, emerging evidence has indicated that Gβγ is able to regulate GPCR signaling through interacting with GPCRs, the Gα subunit, and downstream effectors (30). Predominantly, Gβγ is able to directly interact with and affect the functions of a variety of membrane and intracellular effectors, such as ion channels, adenylyl cyclase, G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) (30). The current model of Gβγ-mediated signaling restricts it mostly to the plasma membrane (PM) (30). In the case of membrane-bound effectors, such as adenylyl cyclases or GIRK channels, Gβγ regulates the activities of these transmembrane proteins through conformational alteration. In the case of cytosolic proteins such as PLCβ2 or GRK2, whose substrates are localized to PM, Gβγ regulates their activity by recruiting the proteins to PM. The activity of Gβγ is primarily regulated by GPCR and Gα, in which GPCR activation leads to conformational changes of Gα. Such change causes replacement of Gα-bound GDP with GTP and release of Gβγ from the heterotrimeric G proteins. The activity of Gβγ could also be regulated by interacting with cytosolic proteins such as RACK1 (7). However, how Gβγ-mediated signaling is regulated in a spatial manner via subcellular compartmentation is largely unknown.GRK2 is a member of a family of GRKs that can phosphorylate the agonist-occupied GPCRs (4). Specific phosphorylation of activated receptors is associated with a decreased responsiveness of GPCR to prolonged stimulation by the agonist, also known as desensitization (15, 26). Gβγ regulates the activities of GRK2 and GRK3 toward several GPCRs (9). In cooperation with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, Gβγ binds to the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of GRK2 and recruits GRK2 to PM, in which it phosphorylates activated GPCRs (18, 30). The crystallographic structure of GRK2 in complex with Gβ1γ2 has been solved (20, 32). On the other hand, AKT is an intracellular target of PI3K and plays a critical role in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. It has been reported that Gβγ could activate AKT in a PI3K-dependent fashion (5), and Gβγ could mediate AKT activation at endosomes (13). Recent data also indicate that the p110β subunit of PI3K signals downstream of GPCR, and the AKT activation mediated by p110β is G protein dependent (14, 17).PAQR3 is a member of the progestin and adipoQ receptor (PAQR) family, and the members of this family are predicted to have seven transmembrane domains similar to GPCRs (31). Recently, we demonstrated that PAQR3 is localized at the Golgi apparatus and is involved in the spatial regulation of Raf kinase, whereby this protein was named Raf kinase trapping to Golgi apparatus (RKTG) (12). Biochemical analysis of RKTG suggested that its N terminus is localized on the cytoplasmic side of the Golgi membrane (21). Using the N terminus of RKTG to screen a Saccharomyces cerevisiae two-hybrid library, we determined that RKTG is able to interact with Gβ, and detailed analyses indicate that RKTG is a spatial regulator of Gβγ signaling.     

Development of inhibitors of heterotrimeric Gαi subunits

Heterotrimeric G-proteins are the immediate downstream effectors of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Endogenous protein guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) like AGS3/4 and RGS12/14 function through GPR/Goloco GDI domains. Extensive characterization of GPR domain peptides indicate they function as selective GDIs for Gα_i by competing for the GPCR and Gβγ and preventing GDP release. We modified a GPR consensus peptide by testing FGF and TAT leader sequences to make the peptide cell permeable. FGF modification inhibited GDI activity while TAT preserved GDI activity. TAT-GPR suppresses G-protein coupling to the receptor and completely blocked α₂-adrenoceptor (α₂AR) mediated decreases in cAMP in HEK293 cells at 100 nM. We then sought to discover selective small molecule inhibitors for Gα_i. Molecular docking was used to identify potential molecules that bind to and stabilize the Gα_i–GDP complex by directly interacting with both Gα_i and GDP. Gα_i–GTP and Gα_q–GDP were used as a computational counter screen and Gα_q–GDP was used as a biological counter screen. Thirty-seven molecules were tested using nucleotide exchange. STD NMR assays with compound 0990, a quinazoline derivative, showed direct interaction with Gα_i. Several compounds showed Gα_i specific inhibition and were able to block α₂AR mediated regulation of cAMP. In addition to being a pharmacologic tool, GDI inhibition of Gα subunits has the advantage of circumventing the upstream component of GPCR-related signaling in cases of overstimulation by agonists, mutations, polymorphisms, and expression-related defects often seen in disease.     

Annexins — Modulators of EGF receptor signalling and trafficking

At the cell surface, activation of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor triggers a complex network of signalling events that regulate a variety of cellular processes. For signal termination, the activated EGF receptor is internalised and targeted to lysosomes for degradation. Microdomain localization at the plasma membrane and endocytic transport of the EGFR is important for the formation of compartment-specific signalling complexes and is regulated by scaffolding and targeting proteins. This includes Ca²⁺-effector proteins, such as calmodulin and annexins (Anx), in particular AnxA1, AnxA2, AnxA6 and as shown recently, AnxA8. Given that these annexins show differences in their expression patterns, subcellular localization and mode of action, they are likely to differentially contribute and cooperate in the fine-tuning of EGFR activity. In support of this hypothesis, current literature suggests these annexins to be involved in different steps that control the endocytic transport and signalling of the EGF receptor. This review summarizes how the coordinated activity of AnxA1, AnxA2, AnxA6 and AnxA8 can contribute to regulate EGF receptor localization and activity.     

Expression pattern of estrogen receptors α and β and G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 in the human testis

Estrogen signaling is considered to play an important role in spermatogenesis, spermiogenesis and male fertility. Estrogens can act via the two nuclear estrogen receptors ESR1 (ERα) and ESR2 (ERβ) or via the intracellular G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER, formerly GPR30). Several reports on the localization and expression of all three receptors in the human testis have been published but are controversial particularly in case of ERα. Contrary to previous studies, we decided therefore to evaluate expression of all three receptors in the testis by a number of different methods and in comparison with MCF-7 cells. Using qPCR, we could show that mRNA expression of ERα is considerably lower and expression of ERβ and GPER much higher in the testis than in MCF-7 cells. RT-PCR after laser-assisted microdissection of tubular and interstitial compartments from normal and Sertoli cell only syndrome testes plus in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analyses of the same samples demonstrated that there is very low expression of ERα in germ cells and in single interstitial cells, very high expression of ERβ in germ cells and Sertoli cells and high expression of GPER in interstitial cells and less in Sertoli cells.     

Determination of GABAAα1 and GABAB1 receptor subunits expression in tissues of gilts during the late gestation

GABA_Aα1 and GABA_B1 receptor subunits are responsible for most behavioral, physiological and pharmacological effects of GABA receptors. We investigated the expression of GABA_Aα1 and GABA_B1 receptor subunits in different tissues of gilts during late pregnancy in hot summer. The mRNA abundance of GABA_Aα1 receptor subunit in different tissues of gilts at d 90 and d 110 of gestation was as follows: d 90: brain > lung > liver > ovary > spleen > kidney > heart; d 110: brain > lung > spleen > liver > ovary > kidney > heart. And, the mRNA abundance of GABA_B1 receptor subunit was as follows: d 90: spleen > lung > brain > kidney > ovary > liver > heart; d 110: spleen > lung > kidney > brain > ovary > liver > heart. The results in this trial indicated that the GABA_Aα1 receptor subunit was abundantly expressed in brain, while GABA_B1 receptor subunit was abundant in spleen and lung of gilts during late gestation. There were no gestation stage-dependent effects on GABA_Aα1 and GABA_B1 receptor subunits expression in all tissues.