不同注意任务类型及难度对猕猴微眼动的影响

微眼动是视觉注视过程中幅度最大、速度最快的眼动,可以消除由于神经系统适应性而产生的视觉衰退现象,在视觉信息处理过程中发挥着重要作用.基于微眼动与视觉感知功能的相关性,设计实验研究猕猴完成显性、隐性注意任务以及不同难度显性注意任务时,视觉注视情况下微眼动的差异.通过对不同难度显性注意任务下微眼动的参数进行比较,发现随着任务难度的增加,微眼动的幅度、速率和频率都被抑制.另一方面,对比不同类型的视觉感知任务(显性注意和隐性注意),发现在相似的实验范式下,隐性注意对微眼动的频率有明显的抑制作用,但幅度和频率没有得到一致的结果,这表明视觉注意任务类型的不同或将导致猕猴完成任务的策略不同.这些工作将为今后进一步研究微眼动产生的神经机制以及视觉注意过程中眼动的作用机制奠定良好的基础.     

睡眠过程中内膝体神经元的听反应后抑制

内侧膝状体神经元接受来自离皮层系统的兴奋和抑制两种神经调节．听觉刺激诱发的内膝体神经元起始反应后会伴随着一段长时抑制．在可自由活动的大鼠上研究了内膝体神经元的听反应后抑制现象．利用植入电极阵列技术,记录了大鼠在睡眠过程中的脑电、肌电以及内膝体神经元胞外放电活动,发现在睡眠的快速眼动时期和非快速眼动时期内膝体神经元存在着听反应后抑制现象,并发现这种抑制更多地出现在非快速眼动睡眠期．在睡眠过程中,丘脑网状核听觉分区的失活会导致内膝体神经元的听反应后抑制消失或减弱．因此,我们推测丘脑网状核神经元参与了内膝体神经元在睡眠中的听反应后抑制,它在非快速眼动睡眠中对内膝体施加了更强的抑制作用．     

反应抑制的额叶-基底神经节模型

额叶-基底神经节模型构成运动控制网络,其网络主要由额下回、辅助运动区、初级运动皮层、初级躯体感觉皮层及基底神经节亚区组成,是调节反应抑制能力的主要网络。目前,评测反应抑制能力的范式主要包括Go/No-Go与Stop-signal范式。多项研究发现,这两种实验范式在进行抑制任务时额叶及基底神经节亚区存在不同的激活,提示其抑制机制可能有所不同。其中,Go/No-Go任务是否由超直接通路调控抑制过程还有待探讨,Stop-signal任务则可能需要间接通路、超直接通路实现对抑制过程的调控。运动控制网络与感觉运动网络、默认模式网络之间的交互作用可能在治疗反应抑制缺陷与其他脑功能疾病中发挥调节作用。     

额叶EEG偏侧化预测情绪灵活性

随着社会竞争的日益加剧,人们在生活、学习、工作中都可能遇到各种与情绪有关的事件,如何根据情境的要求和个人的需要对情绪进行灵活性的反应,对每个人而言都至关重要.情绪灵活性的研究已成为情绪心理学、临床心理学、健康心理学等多个领域热衷讨论的课题.研究发现,左侧和右侧前额叶皮层半球不同程度地涉及加工和调节对情绪刺激的情绪反应,因此,额叶脑电图(EEG)偏侧化与情绪灵活性存在密切关系.但是,额叶EEG偏侧化是否是情绪灵活性的一个客观指标,以及额叶EEG偏侧化怎样预测情绪灵活性,至今仍不清楚.本研究测量了通过情绪电影范式诱发被试产生高兴、悲伤、愤怒、恐惧、厌恶等情绪过程中的额叶EEG活动.结果显示,情绪灵活性的激活模式反映的是情绪的动机维度,而不是情绪的效价维度.在静息状态下,对于与接近动机相关的情绪,额叶EEG左侧化的个体的左侧化程度增加;对于与回避动机相关的情绪,其左侧化程度降低.与之相对,静息状态额叶EEG右侧化的个体,无论对于与趋近动机相关的情绪还是与回避动机相关的情绪,额叶EEG偏侧化的程度没有发生改变.研究表明,额叶EEG偏侧化模式能够预测情绪灵活性,额叶EEG左侧化的个体有更灵活的情绪反应,额叶EEG右侧化的个体则有相对不灵活的情绪反应.     

小脑控制不同类型眼动的神经编码机制：从小脑皮层到小脑核团

近年来许多研究发现,小脑作为运动控制的主要脑区,除参与运动控制外也与孤独症、精神分裂症、奖励相关的认知功能和社会行为有关,因此小脑相关研究越来越受到重视。研究小脑参与运动学习和运动控制的神经机制是神经科学中最重要的课题之一。眼睛运动的肌肉协调和生物运动特征比其他类型的运动更简单,这使眼动成为研究小脑在运动控制中作用的理想模型。作为收集外界信息的主要方式之一,视觉对日常生活至关重要。为确保清晰视觉,3种主要类型的眼动（眼跳、平滑追随眼动（SPEM）和注视）需受小脑的精确控制,以确保静止或移动的物体保持在视小凹的中心。异常眼动可导致视力障碍,并可作为诊断各种疾病的临床指标。因此,眼动控制研究具有重要的医学和生物学意义。虽然对小脑皮层和顶核在调节眼动中的作用有基本了解,但眼动动力学编码的确切神经机制,尤其是小脑顶核控制追随眼动和注视的神经机制仍不清楚。本综述总结了目前小脑在运动和认知等方面的主要研究问题与小脑相关研究的潜在应用价值,以及近年来有关小脑控制眼动的相关文献,并深入探讨了利用单细胞记录和线性回归模型分析小脑皮层和顶核同一神经元同时参与控制不同类型的眼动,而不同类型眼动的不同动力学参数编码原则不同。此外,基于检测微眼跳的研究结果,我们讨论了小脑顶核参与控制视觉注视的可能神经机制。最后,讨论了最近技术进步给小脑研究带来的新机遇,为今后与小脑相关的研究和脑控义肢的优化控制（例如通过单独改善运动参数优化义肢控制）提供了新思路。     

不同运动图象同时刺激左右眼时的交替视动震颤(OKN)现象

采用了同时对左右眼分别以不同的运动图象刺激的实验方法,来测量及分析其OKN眼动反应,探索在OKN反映中两眼之间的输入关系以及眼动控制机制。实验结果发现在两眼的刺激图象不一致时,眼动反应为交替的OKN反应,即中枢神经系统根据各眼的刺激速度,交替地控制产生OKN眼动反应。本文还从闭环控制上讨论了视网膜上速度误差信号的作用。     

不同运动图象同时刺激左右眼时的交替视动震颤(OKN)现象

采用了同时对左右眼分别以不同的运动图象刺激的实验方法,来测量及分析其OKN眼动反应,探索在OKN反映中两眼之间的输入关系以及眼动控制机制。实验结果发现在两眼的刺激图象不一致时,眼动反应为交替的OKN反应,即中枢神经系统根据各眼的刺激速度,交替地控制产生OKN眼动反应。本文还从闭环控制上讨论了视网膜上速度误差信号的作用。     

视听跨通道干扰抑制:儿童ERP研究

为探查视听跨通道干扰抑制的认知神经机制的横断年龄特性,记录分析了14名10岁儿童视听词汇干扰任务时的事件相关电位.在不一致条件下,被试需要对同范畴听觉干扰词进行抑制,一致条件则没有干扰抑制.结果发现,不一致条件的反应时显著长于一致条件.不一致条件下P200的波幅显著大于一致条件,可能揭示了对探测刺激和干扰刺激在知觉上的差异.N300和N550主要分布于额叶区域,不一致条件的波幅均显著大于一致条件.N300可能反映了认知冲突监测,N550可能反映了对干扰刺激的抑制,这为儿童抑制发展脑机制提供了童年期特定阶段的初步证据.     

与作业无关的新异刺激对猕猴额叶神经元延缓期反应的作用

在猕猴执行延缓辨别作业和单纯辨别作业时,观察了与作业无关的新异刺激对额叶神经元延缓期放电的影响。在这两种作业中,延缓期在1—4s之间随机变化。此时,动物必须高度注意信号的变化,稍不注意即导致操作错误。此外,在延缓辨别作业中,动物在延缓期还要暂时记住暗示期的信号,单纯辨别作业则无此要求。在203个与作业相关的神经元中,有70个神经元在延缓期出现放电频率变化,其中见于延缓辨别作业者41个,见于单纯辨别作业者29个。实验结果表明,在这两种作业的延缓期所出现的神经元放电增多的反应,有着许多相同的特点。与课题无关的声、光、触、痛等刺激引起分心时,神经元的延缓期反应出现明显的变化,随之出现操作错误。多数神经元的反应受到抑制,但也有出现反应增强者,而且同一神经元对不同感觉模式的无关刺激可出现不同的效应,表现出不同程度的感觉模式特异性。此外,无关刺激在延缓期和在测试间歇期可产生不同甚至相反的效应。上述在延缓期出现反应的神经元主要位于额叶弓状沟上支内侧部的一定范围内。本文对实验结果进行了讨论,认为额叶神经元的延缓期反应,可能在很大程度上与注意有关。额叶神经元感觉模式各种程度的特异性可能是注意的通道选择性的神经基础。额叶的背内侧部,包括前额叶后部和运动前区前部     

前额叶皮层在社交行为中的作用

社交行为对于个体身心健康和社会发展都极其重要。社交行为障碍已成为多种精神类疾病的典型临床表征,对个体的发展有严重不良影响。前额叶皮层作为调节社交行为的关键脑区之一,参与了社交、情绪、决策等高级功能,其内部神经元、神经胶质细胞的活动变化及相互作用对调节社交行为有着重要影响,而且前额叶皮层与其他脑区之间的协作也会影响不同的社会行为。本文回顾了前额叶皮层中神经元、神经胶质细胞以及脑区投射与社交行为关系的最新研究,系统综述了前额叶皮层在社交行为调节中的作用,以期为社交障碍的神经机制和有效诊疗提供参考。     

视觉图像辨认眼动中的Top－down信息处理

在视觉图像辨认过程中,眼球不是均匀地扫描全幅图像,而是通过一系列快速的眼球跳动来改变注视点位置,有选择地通过注视停顿来采集图象中的关键信息。通过实验对不同图像刺激时的眼动轨迹进行记录与分析,发现：（１）对于简单的几何图形,眼动注视停顿主要集中在图像中几何特征之处,亦即与周围不同的奇异点上;（２）对复杂图象刺激,眼动注视点位置决定于受试者的已有概念模型及其兴趣所在;（３）对中文单字进行辩认时,其眼动模式也是取决于受试者对该单字的知识（也即概念模型）。以上结果提示,视觉图象辨认主要是通过自上而下（ｔｏｐ－ｄｏｗｎ）的信息处理方式才完成．由中枢控制眼球运动,将注视点落到中枢决定的图形奇点上来,通过注视停顿对中枢认为的关键信息之处进行抽提,以实现辨认。这种处理方式不是只取决于输入的图像信息,也不必对目标图像的每个象素进行处理,而只需对图象中少量的关键信息部位进行重点的检测和处理,从而提高了图象信息处理的能力及效率。     

视觉图像辨认眼动中的Top－down信息处理

在视觉图像辨认过程中,眼球不是均匀地扫描全幅图像,而是通过一系列快速的眼球跳动来改变注视点位置,有选择地通过注视停顿来采集图象中的关键信息。通过实验对不同图像刺激时的眼动轨迹进行记录与分析,发现：（１）对于简单的几何图形,眼动注视停顿主要集中在图像中几何特征之处,亦即与周围不同的奇异点上;（２）对复杂图象刺激,眼动注视点位置决定于受试者的已有概念模型及其兴趣所在;（３）对中文单字进行辩认时,其眼动模式也是取决于受试者对该单字的知识（也即概念模型）。以上结果提示,视觉图象辨认主要是通过自上而下（ｔｏｐ－ｄｏｗｎ）的信息处理方式才完成．由中枢控制眼球运动,将注视点落到中枢决定的图形奇点上来,通过注视停顿对中枢认为的关键信息之处进行抽提,以实现辨认。这种处理方式不是只取决于输入的图像信息,也不必对目标图像的每个象素进行处理,而只需对图象中少量的关键信息部位进行重点的检测和处理,从而提高了图象信息处理的能力及效率。     

Interaction between the premotor processes of eye and hand movements: Possible mechanism underlying eye–hand coordination

Interaction between the execution process of eye movement and that of hand movement must be indispensable for eye–hand coordination. The present study investigated corticospinal excitability in the hand muscles during the premotor processes of eye and/or hand movement to elucidate interaction between these processes. Healthy humans performed a precued reaction task of eye and/or finger movement and motor-evoked potentials in the hand muscles were evoked in the reaction time. Leftward eye movement suppressed corticospinal excitability in the right abductor digiti minimi muscle only when little finger abduction was simultaneously executed. Corticospinal excitability in the first dorsal interosseous muscle was not suppressed by eye movement regardless of whether or not it was accompanied by finger movement. Suppression of corticospinal excitability in the hand muscles induced by eye movement in the premotor period depends on the direction of eye movement, the muscle tested, and the premotor process of the tested muscle. The suppression may reflect interaction between the motor process of eye movement and that of hand movement particularly active during eye–hand coordination tasks during which both processes proceed.     

Eye movements of goldfish depending on the relationship between acceleration vector and otolith organ.

Prior experiments demonstrated that the acceleration deviating 15 degrees to the right (left) from the longitudinal body axis could not produce vertical eye movement in left (right) eye of the goldfish. From these results, we expected that vertical eye movement of goldfish for the acceleration perpendicular to the longitudinal body axis might different between right and left eye. However, in this experiments, there were no clear difference in magnitude of vertical eye movements for the acceleration shifted 15 degrees around the left-right body axis. On the other hand, the response of right eye was larger than that of left eye for the acceleration applied from left to right of the body. These results suggest that stimulation from medial to lateral and lateral to medial of the otolith organ has different effect on vertical eye movement in each eye of goldfish.     

Source of the eye-movement signal reaching real-motion cells

The stability of visual perception despite eye movements suggests the existence in the visual system of neurons able to recognize whether the movement of a retinal image is due to the actual movement of an object or is self-induced by the ocular movement. We found neurons of this type in several areas of the monkey visual cortex and named them "real-motion" cells. Extracellular recordings were carried out from single neurons of the cortical prestriate area V3A of two awake macaque monkeys. Eighty-seven neurons were studied by comparing their responses during stimulus movement across the stationary receptive field, and receptive-field movement across the stationary stimulus. This visual stimulation was presented against a uniform visual background, in darkness or against a textured background. Neurons which were not real-motion in light (45/87) maintained their behaviour in darkness, while about 40% of real-motion cells lost this behaviour in darkness. Both real-motion and non real-motion cells maintained the same behaviour when tested against a uniform or textured visual background but often, texture increased the difference in the response that real-motion cells showed between stimulus and eye movement. These data suggest that the eye-movement signal which reaches real-motion cells and is responsible for their behaviour may be either retinal or extraretinal in nature. This double innervation is in good agreement with perceptual phenomena related to the detection of movement in the visual field.     

Vestibulo-ocular reflex and gravity in fish.

An otolith organ on ground behave as a detector of both gravity and linear acceleration, and play an important role in controlling posture and eye movement for tilt of the head or translational motion. On the other hand, a gravitational acceleration ingredient to an otolith organ disappears in microgravity environment. However, linear acceleration can be received by otolith organ and produce a sensation that is different from that on Earth. It is suggested that in microgravity signal from the otolith organ may cause abnormality of posture control and eye movement. We examined function of otolith organ in goldfish revealed from analysis of eye movement induced by linear acceleration. We analyzed vertical eye movements from video images frame by frame. In normal fish, leftward lateral acceleration induced downward eye rotation in the left eye and upward eye rotation in the right eye. Acceleration from caudal to rostra1 evoked downward eye rotation in both eyes. When the direction of acceleration was shifted 15 degrees left, the responses in the left eye disappeared. These results suggested that otolith organs in each side transmitted different signals.     

Sensory and behavioral properties of neurons in posterior parietal cortex of the awake, trained monkey.

Neurons in posterior parietal cortex of the awake, trained monkey respond to passive visual and/or somatosensory stimuli. In general, the receptive fields of these cells are large and nonspecific. When these neurons are studied during visually guided hand movements and eye movements, most of their activity can be accounted for by passive sensory stimulation. However, for some visual cells, the response to a stimulus is enhanced when it is to be the target for a saccadic eye movement. This enhancement is selective for eye movements into the visual receptive field since it does not occur with eye movements to other parts of the visual field. Cells that discharge in association with a visual fixation task have foveal receptive fields and respond to the spots of light used as fixation targets. Cells discharging selectively in association with different directions of tracking eye movements have directionally selective responses to moving visual stimuli. Every cell in our sample discharging in association with movement could be driven by passive sensory stimuli. We conclude that the activity of neurons in posterior parietal cortex is dependent on and indicative of external stimuli but not predictive of movement.     

家兔的开环及闭环视动震颤（OKN）研究

研究了家兔闭环及开环状态的ＯＫＮ反应。闭环时,ＯＫＮ眼动速度与刺激速度成正比,增益接近１。当固定受刺激眼形成开环状态时,ＯＫＮ眼动速度远大于刺激速度,增益可达１０２左右,说明ＯＫＮ系统是由运动跟踪的负反馈机制控制的;刺激范围缩小则眼动反应减弱,表明ＯＫＮ系统对运动信息具有空间总和作用;以视野中不同高度的局部刺激时,发现视网膜中央视带比周边部对ＯＫＮ刺激的敏感性高;单光点刺激视带中央可诱发出清楚的ＯＫＮ反应,这为临床上应用ＯＫＮ客观测定视网膜功能和运动感知提供了可能性。     

Extra-retinal adaptation of cortical motion-processing areas during pursuit eye movements

Repetitive eye movement produces a compelling motion aftereffect (MAE). One mechanism thought to contribute to the illusory movement is an extra-retinal motion signal generated after adaptation. However, extra-retinal signals are also generated during pursuit. They modulate activity within cortical motion-processing area MST, helping transform retinal motion into motion in the world during an eye movement. Given the evidence that MST plays a key role in generating MAE, it may also become indirectly adapted by prolonged pursuit. To differentiate between these two extra-retinal mechanisms we examined storage of the MAE across a period of darkness. In one condition observers were told to stare at a moving pattern, an instruction that induces a more reflexive type of eye movement. In another they were told to deliberately pursue it. We found equally long MAEs when testing immediately after adaptation but not when the test was delayed by 40 s. In the case of the reflexive eye movement the delay almost completely extinguished the MAE, whereas the illusory motion following pursuit remained intact. This suggests pursuit adapts cortical motion-processing areas whereas unintentional eye movement does not. A second experiment showed that cortical mechanisms cannot be the sole determinant of pursuit-induced MAE. Following oblique pursuit, we found MAE direction changes from oblique to vertical. Perceived MAE direction appears to be influenced by a subcortical mechanism as well, one based on the relative recovery rate of horizontal and vertical eye-movement processes recruited during oblique pursuit.     

Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target

In a task requiring an optimal hand pointing (with regards to both time and accuracy) at a peripheral target, there is first a saccade of the eye within 250 ms, followed 100 ms later by the hand movement. However the latency of the hand movement is poorly correlated with that of the eye movement. When the peripheral target is cut off at the onset of the saccade, there is no correlation between the error of the gaze position and the error of the hand pointing. This suggests an early parallel processing of the two motor outputs. The duration of hand movement does not change significantly when subjects either see or not see their hand (closed or open loop). In the open loop situation, the undershoot of the hand pointing increases with target eccentricity, whatever the subjects are allowed or not to do a saccade toward the target. It suggests that the encoding of eye position by itself is a poor index for an accurately guided movement of the hand.