Exon duplication from a fork head to a homeodomain protein

The evolution of complex organisms such as animals requires a large expansion of the number of genes controlling developmental events. In addition, it is thought that domains are shuffled between genes to further increase the complexity and generate new types of genes and functions. Working with the Caenorhabditis elegans homeobox gene ceh-43, the orthologue of fly Distal-less (Dll), we observed sequence similarity to the C. elegans gene fkh-1. Now, with the complete genomic sequence available, we examined this similarity in detail. The region of similarity is confined essentially to one exon in the carboxy terminus of the two genes. Based on the gene structure, we think that an exon of fkh-1 was duplicated to the carboxy terminus of ceh-43, where it was incorporated as the last exon. This duplication event seems to have happened recently since the similarity on the nucleotide level is higher than the sequence similarity between fkh-1 of C. elegans and C. briggsae. Potentially the duplication event was mediated via a short region of sequence similarity between the two open reading frames of the genes. This duplication event clear shows that a part of a gene can successfully be juxtaposed to another gene. These events may perhaps not be rare. Received: 28 March 1999 / Accepted: 8 June 1999     

A model for DNA replication showing how dormant origins safeguard against replication fork failure

Replication origins are ‘licensed' for a single initiation event before entry into S phase; however, many licensed replication origins are not used, but instead remain dormant. The use of these dormant origins helps cells to survive replication stresses that block replication fork movement. Here, we present a computer model of the replication of a typical metazoan origin cluster in which origins are assigned a certain initiation probability per unit time and are then activated stochastically during S phase. The output of this model is in good agreement with experimental data and shows how inefficient dormant origins can be activated when replication forks are inhibited. The model also shows how dormant origins can allow replication to complete even if some forks stall irreversibly. This provides a simple explanation for how replication origin firing is regulated, which simultaneously provides protection against replicative stress while minimizing the cost of using large numbers of replication forks.     

Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers

The fidelity of DNA replication is of paramount importance to the maintenance of genome integrity. When an active replication fork is perturbed, multiple cellular pathways are recruited to stabilize the replication apparatus and to help to bypass or correct the causative problem. However, if the problem is not corrected, the fork may collapse, exposing free DNA ends to potentially inappropriate processing. In prokaryotes, replication fork collapse promotes the activity of recombination proteins to restore a replication fork. Recent work has demonstrated that recombination is also intimately linked to replication in eukaryotic cells, and that recombination proteins are recruited to collapsed, but not stalled, replication forks. In this review we discuss the different types of potential replication fork barriers (RFB) and how these distinct RFBs can result in different DNA structures at the stalled replication fork. The DNA structure checkpoints which act within S phase respond to different RFBs in different ways and we thus discuss the processes that are controlled by the DNA replication checkpoints, paying particular attention to the function of the intra-S phase checkpoint that stabilises the stalled fork.     

Mycobacterial biofilms: a greasy way to hold it together

Microorganisms growing on surfaces can form biofilms under certain conditions. In this issue of Cell, Ojha et al. (2005) investigate biofilm formation in mycobacteria. They identify new cell-wall components that are required for the formation of architecturally complex mature biofilms in these bacteria and the surprising involvement of a chaperone protein in this process.     

Replication fork collapse at a protein‐DNA roadblock leads to fork reversal,promoted by the RecQ helicase

Proteins that bind DNA are the cause of the majority of impediments to replication fork progression and can lead to subsequent collapse of the replication fork. Failure to deal with fork collapse efficiently leads to mutation or cell death. Several models have been proposed for how a cell processes a stalled or collapsed replication fork; eukaryotes and bacteria are not dissimilar in terms of the general pathways undertaken to deal with these events. This study shows that replication fork regression, the combination of replication fork reversal leading to formation of a Holliday Junction along with exonuclease digestion, is the preferred pathway for dealing with a collapsed fork in Escherichia coli. Direct endo‐nuclease activity at the replication fork was not observed. The protein that had the greatest effect on these fork processing events was the RecQ helicase, while RecG and RuvABC, which have previously been implicated in this process, were found to play a lesser role. Eukaryotic RecQ homologues, BLM and WRN, have also been implicated in processing events following replication fork collapse and may reflect a conserved mechanism. Finally, the SOS response was not induced by the protein‐DNA roadblock under these conditions, so did not affect fork processing.     

Chromosome replication: from ORC to fork

A report on the 2001 Eukaryotic DNA Replication meeting, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, 5-9 September 2001.     

RINGs hold the key to ubiquitin transfer

Ubiquitylation, the covalent modification of proteins by the addition of ubiquitin, relies on a cascade of enzymes that culminates in an E3 ligase that promotes the transfer of ubiquitin from an E2 enzyme to the target protein. The most prevalent E3 ligases contain a type of zinc-finger domain called RING, and although an essential role for the RING domain in ubiquitin transfer is widely accepted, the molecular mechanism by which this is achieved remains uncertain. In this review, we highlight recent studies that have suggested that the RING domain modulates the stability of the E2-ubiquitin conjugate so that catalysis is promoted. We also review the role of RING dimerisation and emphasise the importance of studying RING domains in the context of the full-length protein.