Prokaryotic-style frameshifting in a plant translation system: conservation of an unusual single-tRNA slippage event

Ribosomal frameshifting signals are found in mobile genetic elements, viruses and cellular genes of prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Typically they comprise a slippery sequence, X XXY YYZ, where the frameshift occurs, and a stimulatory mRNA element. Here we studied the influence of host translational environment and the identity of slippery sequence-decoding tRNAs on the frameshift mechanism. By expressing candidate signals in Escherichia coli, and in wheatgerm extracts depleted of endogenous tRNAs and supplemented with prokaryotic or eukaryotic tRNA populations, we show that when decoding AAG in the ribosomal A-site, E.coli tRNA(Lys) promotes a highly unusual single-tRNA slippage event in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosomes. This event does not appear to require slippage of the adjacent P-site tRNA, although its identity is influential. Conversely, asparaginyl-tRNA promoted a dual slippage event in either system. Thus, the tRNAs themselves are the main determinants in the selection of single- or dual-tRNA slippage mechanisms. We also show for the first time that prokaryotic tRNA(Asn) is not inherently 'unslippery' and induces efficient frameshifting when in the context of a eukaryotic translation system.     

Maintenance of the correct open reading frame by the ribosome

During translation, a string of non-overlapping triplet codons in messenger RNA is decoded into protein. The ability of a ribosome to decode mRNA without shifting between reading frames is a strict requirement for accurate protein biosynthesis. Despite enormous progress in understanding the mechanism of transfer RNA selection, the mechanism by which the correct reading frame is maintained remains unclear. In this report, evidence is presented that supports the idea that the translational frame is controlled mainly by the stability of codon–anticodon interactions at the P site. The relative instability of such interactions may lead to dissociation of the P-site tRNA from its codon, and formation of a complex with an overlapping codon, the process known as P-site tRNA slippage. We propose that this process is central to all known cases of +1 ribosomal frameshifting, including that required for the decoding of the yeast transposable element Ty3. An earlier model for the decoding of this element proposed 'out-of-frame' binding of A-site tRNA without preceding P-site tRNA slippage.     

A new kinetic model reveals the synergistic effect of E-, P- and A-sites on +1 ribosomal frameshifting

Programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF) is a process by which ribosomes produce two different polypeptides from the same mRNA. In this study, we propose three different kinetic models of +1 PRF, incorporating the effects of the ribosomal E-, P- and A-sites toward promoting efficient +1 frameshifting in Escherichia coli. Specifically, the timing of E-site tRNA dissociation is discussed within the context of the kinetic proofreading mechanism of aminoacylated tRNA (aa-tRNA) selection. Mathematical modeling using previously determined kinetic rate constants reveals that destabilization of deacylated tRNA in the E-site, rearrangement of peptidyl-tRNA in the P-site, and availability of cognate aa-tRNA corresponding to the A-site act synergistically to promote efficient +1 PRF. The effect of E-site codon:anticodon interactions on +1 PRF was also experimentally examined with a dual fluorescence reporter construct. The combination of predictive modeling and empirical testing allowed the rate constant for P-site tRNA slippage (k_s) to be estimated as k_s ≈1.9 s⁻¹ for the release factor 2 (RF2) frameshifting sequence. These analyses suggest that P-site tRNA slippage is the driving force for +1 ribosomal frameshifting while the presence of a ‘hungry codon’ in the A-site and destabilization in the E-site further enhance +1 PRF in E. coli.     

Analysis of the roles of tRNA structure, ribosomal protein L9, and the bacteriophage T4 gene 60 bypassing signals during ribosome slippage on mRNA

A 50-nucleotide coding gap divides bacteriophage T4 gene 60 into two open reading frames. In response to cis-acting stimulatory signals encrypted in the mRNA, the anticodon of the ribosome-bound peptidyl tRNA dissociates from a GGA codon at the end of the first open reading frame and pairs with a GGA codon 47 nucleotides downstream just before the second open reading frame. Mutations affecting ribosomal protein L9 or tRNA(Gly)(2), the tRNA that decodes GGA, alter the efficiency of bypassing. To understand the mechanism of ribosome slippage, this work analyzes the influence of these bypassing signals and mutant translational components on -1 frameshifting at G GGA and hopping over a stop codon immediately flanked by two GGA glycine codons (stop-hopping). Mutant variants of tRNA(Gly)(2) that impair bypassing mediate stop-hopping with unexpected landing specificities, suggesting that these variants are defective in ribosomal P-site codon-anticodon pairing. In a direct competition between -1 frameshifting and stop-hopping, the absence of L9 promotes stop-hopping at the expense of -1 frameshifting without substantially impairing the ability of mutant tRNA(Gly)(2) variants to re-pair with the mRNA by sub-optimal pairing. These observations suggest that L9 defects may stimulate ribosome slippage by enhancing mRNA movement through the ribosome rather than by inducing an extended pause in translation or by destabilizing P-site pairing.Two of the bypassing signals, a cis-acting nascent peptide encoded by the first open reading frame and a stemloop signal located in the 5' portion of the coding gap, stimulate peptidyl-tRNA slippage independently of the rest of the gene 60 context. Evidence is presented suggesting that the nascent peptide signal may stimulate bypassing by destabilizing P-site pairing.     

tRNA properties help shape codon pair preferences in open reading frames

Translation elongation is an accurate and rapid process, dependent upon efficient juxtaposition of tRNAs in the ribosomal A- and P-sites. Here, we sought evidence of A- and P-site tRNA interaction by examining bias in codon pair choice within open reading frames from a range of genomes. Three distinct and marked effects were revealed once codon and dipeptide biases had been subtracted. First, in the majority of genomes, codon pair preference is primarily determined by a tetranucleotide combination of the third nucleotide of the P-site codon, and all 3 nt of the A-site codon. Second, pairs of rare codons are generally under-used in eukaryotes, but over-used in prokaryotes. Third, the analysis revealed a highly significant effect of tRNA-mediated selection on codon pairing in unicellular eukaryotes, Bacillus subtilis, and the gamma proteobacteria. This was evident because in these organisms, synonymous codons decoded in the A-site by the same tRNA exhibit significantly similar P-site pairing preferences. Codon pair preference is thus influenced by the identity of A-site tRNAs, in combination with the P-site codon third nucleotide. Multivariate analysis identified conserved nucleotide positions within A-site tRNA sequences that modulate codon pair preferences. Structural features that regulate tRNA geometry within the ribosome may govern genomic codon pair patterns, driving enhanced translational fidelity and/or rate.     

EF-G-catalyzed translocation of anticodon stem-loop analogs of transfer RNA in the ribosome.

Translocation, catalyzed by elongation factor EF-G, is the precise movement of the tRNA-mRNA complex within the ribosome following peptide bond formation. Here we examine the structural requirement for A- and P-site tRNAs in EF-G-catalyzed translocation by substituting anticodon stem-loop (ASL) analogs for the respective tRNAs. Translocation of mRNA and tRNA was monitored independently; mRNA movement was assayed by toeprinting, while tRNA and ASL movement was monitored by hydroxyl radical probing by Fe(II) tethered to the ASLs and by chemical footprinting. Translocation depends on occupancy of both A and P sites by tRNA bound in a mRNA-dependent fashion. The requirement for an A-site tRNA can be satisfied by a 15 nucleotide ASL analog comprising only a 4 base pair (bp) stem and a 7 nucleotide anticodon loop. Translocation of the ASL is both EF-G- and GTP-dependent, and is inhibited by the translocational inhibitor thiostrepton. These findings show that the D, T and acceptor stem regions of A-site tRNA are not essential for EF-G-dependent translocation. In contrast, no translocation occurs if the P-site tRNA is substituted with an ASL, indicating that other elements of P-site tRNA structure are required for translocation. We also tested the effect of increasing the A-site ASL stem length from 4 to 33 bp on translocation from A to P site. Translocation efficiency decreases as the ASL stem extends beyond 22 bp, corresponding approximately to the maximum dimension of tRNA along the anticodon-D arm axis. This result suggests that a structural feature of the ribosome between the A and P sites, interferes with movement of tRNA analogs that exceed the normal dimensions of the coaxial tRNA anticodon-D arm.     

How translational accuracy influences reading frame maintenance

Most missense errors have little effect on protein function, since they only exchange one amino acid for another. However, processivity errors, frameshifting or premature termination result in a synthesis of an incomplete peptide. There may be a connection between missense and processivity errors, since processivity errors now appear to result from a second error occurring after recruitment of an errant aminoacyl-tRNA, either spontaneous dissociation causing premature termination or translational frameshifting. This is clearest in programmed translational frameshifting where the mRNA programs errant reading by a near-cognate tRNA; this error promotes a second frameshifting error (a dual-error model of frameshifting). The same mechanism can explain frameshifting by suppressor tRNAs, even those with expanded anticodon loops. The previous model that suppressor tRNAs induce quadruplet translocation now appears incorrect for most, and perhaps for all of them. We suggest that the 'spontaneous' tRNA-induced frameshifting and 'programmed' mRNA-induced frameshifting use the same mechanism, although the frequency of frameshifting is very different. This new model of frameshifting suggests that the tRNA is not acting as the yardstick to measure out the length of the translocation step. Rather, the translocation of 3 nucleotides may be an inherent feature of the ribosome.     

Evolution of +1 Programmed Frameshifting Signals and Frameshift-Regulating tRNAs in the Order Saccharomycetales

Programmed translational frameshifting is a ubiquitous but rare mechanism of gene expression in which mRNA sequences cause the translational machinery to shift reading frames with extreme efficiency, up to at least 50%. The mRNA sequences responsible are deceptively simple; the sequence CUU-AGG-C causes about 40% frameshifting when inserted into an mRNA in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The high efficiency of this site depends on a set of S. cerevisiae tRNA isoacceptors that perturb the mechanism of translation to cause the programmed translational error. The simplicity of the system might suggest that it could evolve frequently and perhaps be lost as easily. We have investigated the history of programmed +1 frameshifting in fungi. We find that frameshifting has persisted in two structural genes in budding yeasts, ABP140 and EST3 for about 150 million years. Further, the tRNAs that stimulate the event are equally old. Species that diverged from the lineage earlier both do not employ frameshifting and have a different complement of tRNAs predicted to be inimical to frameshifting. The stability of the coevolution of protein coding genes and tRNAs suggests that frameshifting has been selected for during the divergence of these species. [Reviewing Editor: Dr. Niles Lehman]     

Mutational analysis of the "slippery-sequence" component of a coronavirus ribosomal frameshifting signal.

The ribosomal frameshift signal in the genomic RNA of the coronavirus IBV is composed of two elements, a heptanucleotide "slippery-sequence" and a downstream RNA pseudoknot. We have investigated the kinds of slippery sequence that can function at the IBV frameshift site by analysing the frameshifting properties of a series of slippery-sequence mutants. We firstly confirmed that the site of frameshifting in IBV was at the heptanucleotide stretch UUUAAAC, and then used our knowledge of the pseudoknot structure and a suitable reporter gene to prepare an expression construct that allowed both the magnitude and direction of ribosomal frameshifting to be determined for candidate slippery sequences. Our results show that in almost all of the sequences tested, frameshifting is strictly into the -1 reading frame. Monotonous runs of nucleotides, however, gave detectable levels of a -2/+1 frameshift product, and U stretches in particular gave significant levels (2% to 21%). Preliminary evidence suggests that the RNA pseudoknot may play a role in influencing frameshift direction. The spectrum of slip-sequences tested in this analysis included all those known or suspected to be utilized in vivo. Our results indicate that triplets of A, C, G and U are functional when decoded in the ribosomal P-site following slippage (XXXYYYN) although C triplets were the least effective. In the A-site (XXYYYYN), triplets of C and G were non-functional. The identity of the nucleotide at position 7 of the slippery sequence (XXXYYYN) was found to be a critical determinant of frameshift efficiency and we show that a hierarchy of frameshifting exists for A-site codons. These observations lead us to suggest that ribosomal frameshifting at a particular site is determined, at least in part, by the strength of the interaction of normal cellular tRNAs with the A-site codon and does not necessarily involve specialized "shifty" tRNAs.     

Special peptidyl-tRNA molecules can promote translational frameshifting without slippage.

Recently we described an unusual programmed +1 frameshift event in yeast retrotransposon Ty3. Frameshifting depends on the presence of peptidyl-tRNA(AlaCGC) on the GCG codon in the ribosomal P site and on a translational pause stimulated by the slowly decoded AGU codon. Frameshifting occurs on the sequence GCG-AGU-U by out-of-frame binding of a valyl-tRNA to GUU without slippage of peptidyl-tRNA(AlaCGC). This mechanism challenges the conventional understanding that frameshift efficiency must correlate with the ability of mRNA-bound tRNA to slip between cognate or near-cognate codons. Though frameshifting does not require slippery tRNAs, it does require special peptidyl-tRNAs. We show that overproducing a second isoacceptor whose anticodon had been changed to CGC eliminated frameshifting; peptidyl-tRNA(AlaCGC) must have a special capacity to induce +1 frameshifting in the adjacent ribosomal A site. In order to identify other special peptidyl-tRNAs, we tested the ability of each of the other 63 codons to replace GCG in the P site. We found no correlation between the ability to stimulate +1 frameshifting and the ability of the cognate tRNA to slip on the mRNA--several codons predicted to slip efficiently do not stimulate frameshifting, while several predicted not to slip do stimulate frameshifting. By inducing a severe translational pause, we identified eight tRNAs capable of inducing measurable +1 frameshifting, only four of which are predicted to slip on the mRNA. We conclude that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, special peptidyl-tRNAs can induce frameshifting dependent on some characteristic(s) other than the ability to slip on the mRNA.     

Transfer RNA docking pair model in the ribosomal pre- and post-translocational states.

A consensus has been reached that the conformation of the anticodon-codon interactions of two adjacent tRNA molecules on the ribosome is a Sundaralingam-type (S-type). Even if it is kept to the S-type, there are still various possibilities. Various experimental data have been supporting an idea that the conformation of A-site tRNA is different from that of P-site tRNA. Those data as well as the recent result of Brimacombe and co-workers that U20:1 of lupin tRNAmMetbound to the A-site was cross-linked to a region, 875-905, of 23S rRNA in combination with the other recent findings of Nierhaus and co-workers about the spin-contrast method of neutron diffraction of the ribosome and the better accessible nucleotide patterns of phosphorothioated tRNAs on the ribosome have led to a new tRNA docking pair model, in which the highly conserved G18 and G19 of D-loop in A-site tRNA and C56 and C61 of TpsiC-loop in P-site tRNA base pair along with the conventional base pairs of adjacent codon-anticodon interactions. This A-P tRNA pair model can be translocated to the P-E tRNA pair model without changing the conformation except the ACCA termini, keeping the position of the growing nascent polypeptide chain.     

Identification of oxidative stress-regulated genes in rat aortic smooth muscle cells by suppression subtractive hybridization

Transfer RNA modification improves the rate of aa-tRNA selection at the A-site and the fitness in the P-site and thereby prevents frameshifting according to a new model how frameshifting occurs [Qian et al. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 471-482]. Evidence that the presence of various modified nucleosides in tRNA also influences central metabolism, thiamine metabolism, and bacterial virulence is reviewed.     

Locking and unlocking of ribosomal motions

During the ribosomal translocation, the binding of elongation factor G (EF-G) to the pretranslocational ribosome leads to a ratchet-like rotation of the 30S subunit relative to the 50S subunit in the direction of the mRNA movement. By means of cryo-electron microscopy we observe that this rotation is accompanied by a 20 A movement of the L1 stalk of the 50S subunit, implying that this region is involved in the translocation of deacylated tRNAs from the P to the E site. These ribosomal motions can occur only when the P-site tRNA is deacylated. Prior to peptidyl-transfer to the A-site tRNA or peptide removal, the presence of the charged P-site tRNA locks the ribosome and prohibits both of these motions.     

Improvement of reading frame maintenance is a common function for several tRNA modifications

Transfer RNAs from all organisms contain many modified nucleosides. Their vastly different chemical structures, their presence in different tRNAs, their occurrence in different locations in tRNA and their influence on different reactions in which tRNA participates suggest that each modified nucleoside may have its own specific function. However, since the frequency of frameshifting in several different mutants [mnmA, mnmE, tgt, truA (hisT), trmD, miaA, miaB and miaE] defective in tRNA modification was higher compared with the corresponding wild-type controls, these modifications have a common function: they all improve reading frame maintenance. Frameshifting occurs by peptidyl-tRNA slippage, which is influenced by the hypomodified tRNA in two ways: (i) a hypomodified tRNA in the ternary complex may decrease the rate by which the complex is recruited to the A-site and thereby increasing peptidyl-tRNA slippage; or (ii) a hypomodified peptidyl-tRNA may be more prone to slip than its fully modified counterpart. We propose that the improvement of reading frame maintenance has been and is the major selective factor for the emergence of new modified nucleosides.     

How are tRNAs and mRNA arranged in the ribosome? An attempt to correlate the stereochemistry of the tRNA-mRNA interaction with constraints imposed by the ribosomal topography.

Two tRNA molecules at the ribosomal A- and P-sites, with a relatively small angle between the planes of the L-shaped molecules, can be arranged in two mutually exclusive orientations. In one (the 'R'-configuration), the T-loop of the A-site tRNA faces the D-loop of the P-site tRNA, whereas in the other (the 'S'-configuration) the D-loop of the A-site tRNA faces the T-loop of the P-site tRNA. A number of stereochemical arguments, based on the crystal structure of 'free' tRNA, favour the R-configuration. In the ribosome, the CCA-ends of the tRNA molecules are 'fixed' at the base of the central protuberance (the peptidyl transferase centre) of the 50S subunit, and the anticodon loops lie in the neck region (the decoding site) of the 30S subunit. The translocation step is essentially a rotational movement of the tRNA from the A- to the P-site, and there is convincing evidence that the A-site must be located nearest to the L7/L12 protuberance of the 50S subunit. The mRNA in the two codon-anticodon duplexes lies on the 'inside' of the 'elbows' of the tRNA molecules (in both the S-type and R-type configurations), and runs up between the two molecules from the A- to the P-site in the 3' to 5'-direction. These considerations have the consequence that in the S-configuration the mRNA in the codon-anticodon duplexes is directed towards the 50S subunit, whereas in the R-configuration it is directed towards the 30S subunit. The results of site-directed cross-linking experiments, in particular cross-links to mRNA at positions within or very close to the codons interacting with A- or P-site tRNA, favour the latter situation. This conclusion is in direct contradiction to other current models for the arrangement of mRNA and tRNA on the ribosome.     

Helix 69 in 23S rRNA modulates decoding by wild type and suppressor tRNAs

Helix 69 of 23S rRNA forms one of the major inter-subunit bridges of the 70S ribosome and interacts with A- and P-site tRNAs and translation factors. Despite the proximity of h69 to the decoding center and tRNAs, the contribution of h69 to the tRNA selection process is unclear: previous genetic analyses have shown that h69 mutations increase frameshifting and readthrough of stop codons. However, a complete deletion of h69 does not affect the selection of cognate tRNAs in vitro. To address these discrepancies, the in vivo effects of a range of single- and multi-base h69 mutations in Escherichia coli 23S rRNA on various translation errors have been determined. While a majority of the h69 mutations examined here affected readthrough of stop codons and frameshifting, the ΔA1916 single base deletion mutation uniquely influenced missense decoding. Different h69 mutants had either increased or decreased levels of stop codon readthrough. The h69 mutations that decreased UGA readthrough also decreased UGA reading by a mutant, near-cognate tRNA^Trp carrying a G24A substitution in the D arm, but had far less effect on UGA reading by a suppressor tRNA with a complementary anticodon. These results suggest that h69 interactions with release factors contribute significantly to termination efficiency and that interaction with the D arm of A-site tRNA is important for discrimination between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs.     

tRNA slippage at the tmRNA resume codon

The bacterial ribosome does not initiate translation on the mRNA portion of tmRNA; instead translation that had begun on a separate mRNA molecule resumes at a particular triplet on tmRNA (the resume codon). For at least two tRNAs that could pair with both the resume and -2 triplets on mutant tmRNAs, UAA (stop) as the second codon induced high-frequency -2 slippage on the resume codon in the P site. The frameshift product was not detected when the -2 base was altered. Deficiency for ribosomal L9 protein, which affects other cases of frameshifting, had no significant effect. A special feature of this frameshifting is its dependence on a particular context, that of the tmRNA resume codon; it failed on the same sequence in a regular mRNA, and, more strikingly, at the second tmRNA codon. This focuses attention on the peculiar features expected of the slippage-prone state, such as unusual E-site filling, that might make the P-site resume codon:anticodon interaction especially unstable. Keywords: tmRNA; ribosome; frameshift; E site; translation     

Efficient stimulation of site-specific ribosome frameshifting by antisense oligonucleotides

Evidence is presented that morpholino, 2'-O-methyl, phosphorothioate, and RNA antisense oligonucleotides can direct site-specific -1 translational frameshifting when annealed to mRNA downstream from sequences where the P- and A-site tRNAs are both capable of repairing with -1 frame codons. The efficiency of ribosomes shifting into the new frame can be as high as 40%, determined by the sequence of the frameshift site, as well as the location, sequence composition, and modification of the antisense oligonucleotide. These results demonstrate that a perfect duplex formed by complementary oligonucleotides is sufficient to induce high level -1 frameshifting. The implications for the mechanism of action of natural programmed translational frameshift stimulators are discussed.     

Different conformations of tRNA in the ribosomal P-site and A-site

Footprinting studies involving radioactively end-labelled tRNA species bound at either the ribosomal P- or A-site have yielded information that the tRNA's conformation is different in the two sites. Appropriate controls showed the relevance of using poly(U)-directed tRNAPhe binding in the P-site and Phe-tRNAPhe in the A-site. Digestion of the tRNA species was effected by RNases T1, T2 and cobra venom RNase. Experiments were performed with tRNAs 32P-labelled at either end to establish positions of primary cuts more confidently. In addition to the common protection of the aminoacyl-stem and anticodon-arm, footprinting experiments revealed striking differences in the accessibility of the T- and D-loops of tRNAs bound in the P- and A-sites. We observed a more open structure for the tRNA in the A-site. These results are consistent with a dynamic structure of tRNA during the translocation step of protein biosynthesis.     

Programmed +1 frameshifting stimulated by complementarity between a downstream mRNA sequence and an error-correcting region of rRNA

Like most retroviruses and retrotransposons, the retrotransposon Ty3 expresses its pol gene analog (POL3) as a translational fusion to the upstream gag analog (GAG3). The Gag3-Pol3 fusion occurs by frameshifting during translation of the mRNA that encodes the two separate but overlapping ORFs. We showed previously that the shift occurs by out-of-frame binding of a normal aminoacyl-tRNA in the ribosomal A site caused by an aberrant codonoanticodon interaction in the P site. This event is unlike all previously described programmed translational frameshifts because it does not require tRNA slippage between cognate or near-cognate codons in the mRNA. A sequence of 15 nt distal to the frameshift site stimulates frameshifting 7.5-fold. Here we show that the Ty3 stimulator acts as an unstructured region to stimulate frameshifting. Its function depends on strict spacing from the site of frameshifting. Finally, the stimulator increases frameshifting dependent on sense codon-induced pausing, but has no effect on frameshifting dependent on pauses induced by nonsense codons. Complementarity between the stimulator and a portion of the accuracy center of the ribosome, Helix 18, implies that the stimulator may directly disrupt error correction by the ribosome.