Inferior retinal light exposure is more effective than superior retinal exposure in suppressing melatonin in humans

Illumination of different areas of the human retina elicits differences in acute light-induced suppression of melatonin. The aim of this study was to compare changes in plasma melatonin levels when light exposures of equal illuminance and equal photon dose were administered to superior, inferior, and full retinal fields. Nine healthy subjects participated in the study. Plexiglass eye shields were modified to permit selective exposure of the superior and inferior halves of the retinas of each subject. The Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer was used both to confirm intact full visual fields and to quantify exposure of upper and lower visual fields. On study nights, eyes were dilated, and subjects were exposed to patternless white light for 90 min between 0200 and 0330 under five conditions: (1) full retinal exposure at 200 lux, (2) full retinal exposure at 100 lux, (3) inferior retinal exposure at 200 lux, (4) superior retinal exposure at 200 lux, and (5) a dark-exposed control. Plasma melatonin levels were determined by radioimmunoassay. ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of exposure condition (F = 5.91, p < 0.005). Post hoc Fisher PLSD tests showed significant (p < 0.05) melatonin suppression of both full retinal exposures as well as the inferior retinal exposure; however, superior retinal exposure was significantly less effective in suppressing melatonin. Furthermore, suppression with superior retinal exposure was not significantly different from that of the dark control condition. The results indicate that the inferior retina contributes more to the light-induced suppression of melatonin than the superior retina at the photon dosages tested in this study. Findings suggest a greater sensitivity or denser distribution of photoreceptors in the inferior retina are involved in light detection for the retinohypothalamic tract of humans.     

Nasal versus temporal illumination of the human retina: effects on core body temperature, melatonin, and circadian phase

The mammalian retina contains both visual and circadian photoreceptors. In humans, nocturnal stimulation of the latter receptors leads to melatonin suppression, which might cause reduced nighttime sleepiness. Melatonin suppression is maximal when the nasal part of the retina is illuminated. Whether circadian phase shifting in humans is due to the same photoreceptors is not known. The authors explore whether phase shifts and melatonin suppression depend on the same retinal area. Twelve healthy subjects participated in a within-subjects design and received all of 3 light conditions--1) 10 lux of dim light on the whole retina, 2) 100 lux of ocular light on the nasal part of the retina, and 3) 100 lux of ocular light on the temporal part of the retina--on separate nights in random order. In all 3 conditions, pupils were dilated before and during light exposure. The protocol consisted of an adaptation night followed by a 23-h period of sustained wakefulness, during which a 4-h light pulse was presented at a time when maximal phase delays were expected. Nasal illumination resulted in an immediate suppression of melatonin but had no effect on subjective sleepiness or core body temperature (CBT). Nasal illumination delayed the subsequent melatonin rhythm by 78 min, which is significantly (p= 0.016) more than the delay drift in the dim-light condition (38 min), but had no detectable phase-shifting effect on the CBT rhythm. Temporal illumination suppressed melatonin less than the nasal illumination and had no effect on subjective sleepiness and CBT. Temporal illumination delayed neither the melatonin rhythm nor the CBT rhythm. The data show that the suppression of melatonin does not necessarily result in a reduction of subjective sleepiness and an elevation ofCBT. In addition, 100 lux of bright white light is strong enough to affect the photoreceptors responsible for the suppression of melatonin but not strong enough to have a significant effect on sleepiness and CBT. This may be due to the larger variability of the latter variables.     

Relationship between individual difference in melatonin suppression by light and habitual bedtime

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between individual difference in melatonin suppression by exposure to light and habitual bedtime. Seventeen healthy male students (mean age: 22.6+/-2.4 yr) volunteered to participate in the study. The subjects were exposed to light (1000 lx) for 2 hours from 2 hours before the time of peak salivary melatonin concentration. Two hours after exposure to the light, melatonin suppression had occurred in fifteen subjects. No significant correlation was found between the rate of melatonin suppression and habitual bedtime in the fifteen subjects in whom melatonin suppression occurred. However, the habitual bedtime of the two subjects in whom melatonin suppression did not occur was earlier than that of the other subjects. These results suggest that there are some people with very low sensitivity to light and that this may affect habitual bedtime.     

Melatonin suppression during a simulated night shift in medium intensity light is increased by 10-minute breaks in dim light and decreased by 10-minute breaks in bright light

ABSTRACT

Exposure to light at night results in disruption of endogenous circadian rhythmicity and/or suppression of pineal melatonin, which can consequently lead to acute or chronic adverse health problems. In the present study, we investigated whether exposure to very dim light or very bright light for a short duration influences melatonin suppression, subjective sleepiness, and performance during exposure to constant moderately bright light. Twenty-four healthy male university students were divided into two experimental groups: Half of them (mean age: 20.0 ± 0.9 years) participated in an experiment for short-duration (10 min) light conditions of medium intensity light (430 lx, medium breaks) vs. very dim light (< 1 lx, dim breaks) and the other half (mean age: 21.3 ± 2.5 years) participated in an experiment for short-duration light conditions of medium intensity light (430 lx, medium breaks) vs. very bright light (4700 lx, bright breaks). Each simulated night shift consisting of 5 sets (each including 50-minute night work and 10-minute break) was performed from 01:00 to 06:00 h. The subjects were exposed to medium intensity light (550 lx) during the night work. Each 10-minute break was conducted every hour from 02:00 to 06:00 h. Salivary melatonin concentrations were measured, subjective sleepiness was assessed, the psychomotor vigilance task was performed at hourly intervals from 21:00 h until the end of the experiment. Compared to melatonin suppression between 04:00 and 06:00 h in the condition of medium breaks, the condition of dim breaks significantly promoted melatonin suppression and the condition of bright breaks significantly diminished melatonin suppression. However, there was no remarkable effect of either dim breaks or bright breaks on subjective sleepiness and performance of the psychomotor vigilance task. Our findings suggest that periodic exposure to light for short durations during exposure to a constant light environment affects the sensitivity of pineal melatonin to constant light depending on the difference between light intensities in the two light conditions (i.e., short light exposure vs. constant light exposure). Also, our findings indicate that exposure to light of various intensities at night could be a factor influencing the light-induced melatonin suppression in real night work settings.     

Nocturnal melatonin levels in human volunteers exposed to intermittent 60 Hz magnetic fields

Two double-blind laboratory-based studies were performed to determine whether a suppression of nocturnal melatonin similar to that observed in rodents occurs when humans are exposed to magnetic fields at night. In study 1, 33 men were exposed to sham, 10 mG, or 200 mG intermittent, circularly polarized magnetic fields from 2300 to 0700 h under controlled environmental and exposure test conditions. Overall, exposure had no effect on melatonin levels. Men with preexisting low levels of melatonin, however, showed significantly greater suppression of melatonin when they were exposed to light and also when they were exposed to the 200 mG magnetic-field condition. Study 2 directly tested the hypothesis that low-melatonin subjects show enhanced sensitivity when exposed to light and to 200 mG magnetic fields. After preexposure screening, each of 40 men slept in the exposure facility on two nights. On one night, the men were sham exposed. On the other night, they were exposed to the 200 mG field condition used previously. Again, exposure had no overall effect on melatonin levels. The original finding of enhanced sensitivity in low-melatonin subjects was not replicated in this study. We conclude that the intermittent exposure conditions used in these two studies were not effective in altering nocturnal melatonin release patterns in human volunteers. Further research is underway with regard to exposure parameters, hormonal and immune system measures, and individual differences. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Circadian rhythm of tryptophan hydroxylase activity in chicken retina

1. Retinal tryptophan hydroxylase activity in chickens (1-4 weeks old and embryos) was estimated by determination of levels of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5HTP) in retinas at defined intervals after inhibition of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase with m-hydroxybenzylhydrazine (NSD1015). 2. The relationship of tryptophan hydroxylase activity to photoperiod was explored. In chickens maintained on a 12-hr light: 12-hr dark cycle, a diurnal cycle in tryptophan hydroxylase activity was observed. Activity during middark phase was 4.4 times that seen in midlight phase. Cyclic changes in tryptophan hydroxylase activity persisted in constant darkness with a period of approximately 1 day, indicating regulation of the enzyme by a circadian oscillator. The phase of the tryptophan hydroxylase rhythm was found to be determined by the phase of the light/dark cycle. The relationship of the tryptophan hydroxylase rhythm to the light/dark cycle mirrors previously described rhythms of melatonin synthesis and serotonin N-acetyltransferase (NAT) activity in the retina. 3. Light exposure for 1 hr during dark phase suppressed NAT activity by 82%, while tryptophan hydroxylase activity was suppressed by only 30%. 4. Based on the differential responses of retinal NAT activity and tryptophan hydroxylase activity to acute light exposure during dark phase, it was predicted that exposure to light during dark phase would divert serotonin in the retina from melatonin biosynthesis to oxidation by MAO. In support of this, levels of 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5HIAA) in retina were found to be elevated approximately two-fold in chickens exposed to 30 min of light during dark phase. In pargyline-treated chickens, 2 hr of light exposure during dark phase was found to increase retinal serotonin levels by 64% over pargyline-treated controls. 5. Cyclic changes in tryptophan hydroxylase activity and NAT activity persisted for 2-3 days in constant light. Tryptophan hydroxylase activity at mid-night gradually decreased on successive days in constant light; on the first day of constant light, tryptophan hydroxylase activity at mid-night was 70% of activity seen during middark phase of the normal light/dark cycle and decreased further on subsequent days. In contrast, on each of 3 days of constant light, NAT activity at mid-night was approximately 15% of normal middark phase activity. 6. Cycloheximide completely inhibited the nocturnal increase in tryptophan hydroxylase activity when given immediately before light offset. The nocturnal increase in NAT activity was inhibited in a similar fashion. 7. Like the development of the NAT rhythm, cyclic changes of tryptophan hydroxylase activity in the retinas of chickens began on or immediately before the day of hatching. hatching.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Blue light from light-emitting diodes elicits a dose-dependent suppression of melatonin in humans

Light suppresses melatonin in humans, with the strongest response occurring in the short-wavelength portion of the spectrum between 446 and 477 nm that appears blue. Blue monochromatic light has also been shown to be more effective than longer-wavelength light for enhancing alertness. Disturbed circadian rhythms and sleep loss have been described as risk factors for astronauts and NASA ground control workers, as well as civilians. Such disturbances can result in impaired alertness and diminished performance. Prior to exposing subjects to short-wavelength light from light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (peak λ = 469 nm; 1/2 peak bandwidth = 26 nm), the ocular safety exposure to the blue LED light was confirmed by an independent hazard analysis using the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists exposure limits. Subsequently, a fluence-response curve was developed for plasma melatonin suppression in healthy subjects (n = 8; mean age of 23.9 ± 0.5 years) exposed to a range of irradiances of blue LED light. Subjects with freely reactive pupils were exposed to light between 2:00 and 3:30 AM. Blood samples were collected before and after light exposures and quantified for melatonin. The results demonstrate that increasing irradiances of narrowband blue-appearing light can elicit increasing plasma melatonin suppression in healthy subjects (P < 0.0001). The data were fit to a sigmoidal fluence-response curve (R(2) = 0.99; ED(50) = 14.19 μW/cm(2)). A comparison of mean melatonin suppression with 40 μW/cm(2) from 4,000 K broadband white fluorescent light, currently used in most general lighting fixtures, suggests that narrow bandwidth blue LED light may be stronger than 4,000 K white fluorescent light for suppressing melatonin.     

Entrainment of Circadian Programs

Circadian rhythms were recently proposed as a measure of physiological state and prognosis in disorders of consciousness (DOC). So far, melatonin regulation was never assessed in vegetative state (VS). Aim of our research was to investigate the nocturnal melatonin levels and light-induced melatonin suppression in a cohort of VS patients. We assessed six consecutive patients (four men, age 33.3?±?9.3 years) with post-traumatic VS and nine age-matched healthy volunteers (five men, age 34.3?±?8.9 years) on two consecutive nights: one baseline and one light exposure night. During baseline, night subjects were in bed in a dim (<5?lux) room from 10?pm to 8?am. Blood samples were collected hourly 00:30–3:30?am (00:30?=?MLT1; 1:30?=?MLT2; 2:30?=?MLT3; and 3:30?=?MLT4). Identical setting was used for melatonin suppression test night, except for the exposure to monochromatic (470?nm) light from 1:30 to 3:30?am. Plasma melatonin levels were evaluated by radioimmunoassay. Magnitude of melatonin suppression was assessed by melatonin suppression score (caMSS) and suppression rate. We searched for group differences in melatonin levels, differences between repeated samples melatonin concentrations during baseline night and light exposure night, and light-induced suppression of melatonin secretion. During baseline night, controls showed an increase of melatonin (MLT4 vs MLT1, p?=?0.037), while no significant changes were observed in VS melatonin levels (p?=?0.172). Baseline night MLT4 was significantly lower in VS vs controls (p?=?0.036). During light-exposure night, controls displayed a significant suppression of melatonin (MLT3 and MLT4 vs MLT2, p?=?0.016 and 0.002, respectively), while VS patients displayed no significant changes. The magnitude of light-induced suppression of melatonin levels was statistically different between groups considering control adjusted caMSS (p?=?0.000), suppression rate (p?=?0.002) and absolute percentage difference (p?=?0.012). These results demonstrate for the first time that VS patients present an alteration in night melatonin secretion and reduced light-induced melatonin suppression. These findings confirm previous studies demonstrating a disruption of the circadian system in DOC and suggest a possible benefit from melatonin supplementation in VS.     

Influence of eye colors of Caucasians and Asians on suppression of melatonin secretion by light

This experiment tested effects of human eye pigmentation depending on the ethnicity on suppression of nocturnal melatonin secretion by light. Ten healthy Caucasian males with blue, green, or light brown irises (light-eyed Caucasians) and 11 Asian males with dark brown irises (dark-eyed Asians) volunteered to participate in the study. The mean ages of the light-eyed Caucasians and dark-eyed Asians were 26.4 +/- 3.2 and 25.3 +/- 5.7 years, respectively. The subjects were exposed to light (1,000 lux) for 2 h at night. The starting time of exposure was set to 2 h before the time of peak salivary melatonin concentration of each subject, which was determined in a preliminary experiment. Salivary melatonin concentration and pupil size were measured before exposure to light and during exposure to light. The percentage of suppression of melatonin secretion by light was calculated. The percentage of suppression of melatonin secretion 2 h after the start of light exposure was significantly larger in light-eyed Caucasians (88.9 +/- 4.2%) than in dark-eyed Asians (73.4 +/- 20.0%) (P < 0.01). No significant difference was found between pupil sizes in light-eyed Caucasians and dark-eyed Asians. These results suggest that sensitivity of melatonin to light suppression is influenced by eye pigmentation and/or ethnicity.     

Quantal melatonin suppression by exposure to low intensity light in man

Plasma melatonin concentrations were examined following three relatively low intensities of artificial light. Six normal, healthy control subjects were all exposed to (a) 200 lux, (b) 400 lux and (c) 600 lux for a three hour duration from midnight to 0300 h. Blood was also collected on a control night where light intensity was less than 10 lux throughout. Significant suppression of melatonin was observed following light of 400 lux and 600 lux intensity when compared to the control night (p less than 0.05; Mann-Whitney U-test). 200 lux light did not produce a statistically significant melatonin suppression when compared with control samples. Each light intensity produced its own individual maximal melatonin suppression by one hour of exposure. Increased duration of exposure to the light had no further influence on melatonin plasma concentrations. These data confirm a dose response relationship between light and melatonin suppression, and indicate that there is no reciprocal relationship between the effects of light intensity and the duration of exposure on maximal melatonin suppression in man.     

Extended exposure to continuous low intensity light abolishes the photosensitivity of retinal dopamine neurons

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 2 groups. One group (experimental) was housed for 6 months in continuous low intensity light while the other (control) was exposed to standard 14 hr light: 10 hr dark cyclic lighting conditions for the entire time. For both the control and experimental groups the light intensity was 350-700 Lux. After 6 months, the experimental rats were returned to cyclic lighting. At one week and again at 2 months the light aversion behavior of all rats was tested in a light/dark test box. The experimental rats chose the dark side of the box only 58% of the time while control animals preferred the dark 79% of the time. Since rats normally are nocturnal and avoid light, these results suggest that the experimental rats may have permanently lost a functionally significant portion of the ability to detect light. After the second behavioral test all rats were dark adapted and 15 hr later the effect of short term (30 or 60 min) exposure to light on DA turnover in one retina from each rat was assessed. The other retina from each rat was fixed and examined histologically. Light significantly enhanced the alpha methyl-p-tyrosine induced decline of DA in the retinas of the control rats but exerted no similar effect in the experimental animals. The retinal DA contents of the experimental rats were substantially depleted. Histological examination suggested that the outer nuclear layers of the experimental retinas were more severely damaged than those from rats exposed to continuous light for 4 months but still contained a few pycnotic photoreceptor nuclei and nearly normal looking inner neural layers. These results indicate that extended exposure to light eventually abolishes light aversion behavior and at this time there is also a loss of the photosensitivity of the dopaminergic amacrine neurons.     

Less exposure to daily ambient light in winter increases sensitivity of melatonin to light suppression

This study was carried out to examine the seasonal difference in the magnitude of the suppression of melatonin secretion induced by exposure to light in the late evening. The study was carried out in Akita (39 degrees North, 140 degrees East), in the northern part of Japan, where the duration of sunshine in winter is the shortest. Ten healthy male university students (mean age: 21.9+/-1.2 yrs) volunteered to participate twice in the study in winter (from January to February) and summer (from June to July) 2004. According to Japanese meteorological data, the duration of sunshine in Akita in the winter (50.5 h/month) is approximately one-third of that in summer (159.7 h/month). Beginning one week prior to the start of the experiment, the level of daily ambient light to which each subject was exposed was recorded every minute using a small light sensor that was attached to the subject's wrist. In the first experiment, saliva samples were collected every hour over a period of 24 h in a dark experimental room (<15 lux) to determine peak salivary melatonin concentration. The second experiment was conducted after the first experiment to determine the percentage of melatonin suppression induced by exposure to light. The starting time of exposure to light was set 2 h before the time of peak salivary melatonin concentration detected in the first experiment. The subjects were exposed to light (1000 lux) for 2 h using white fluorescent lamps (4200 K). The percentage of suppression of melatonin by light was calculated on the basis of the melatonin concentration determined before the start of exposure to light. The percentage of suppression of melatonin 2 h after the start of exposure to light was significantly greater in winter (66.6+/-18.4%) than summer (37.2+/-33.2%), p<0.01). The integrated level of daily ambient light from rising time to bedtime in summer was approximately twice that in winter. The results suggest that the increase in suppression of melatonin by light in winter is caused by less exposure to daily ambient light.     

A Personal Light-Treatment Device for Improving Sleep Quality in the Elderly: Dynamics of Nocturnal Melatonin Suppression at Two Exposure Levels

Light treatment has been used as a non-pharmacological tool to help mitigate poor sleep quality frequently found in older people. In order to increase compliance to non-pharmacological light treatments, new, more efficacious light-delivery systems need to be developed. A prototype personal light-treatment device equipped with low brightness blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (peak wavelength near 470 nm) was tested for its effectiveness in suppressing nocturnal melatonin, a measure of circadian stimulation. Two levels of corneal irradiance were set to deliver two prescribed doses of circadian light exposure. Eleven older subjects, between 51 and 80 yrs of age who met the selection criteria, were exposed to a high and a low level of light for 90 min on separate nights from the personal light-treatment device. Blood and saliva samples were collected at prescribed times for subsequent melatonin assay. After 1 h of light exposure, the light-induced nocturnal melatonin suppression level was about 35% for the low-light level and about 60% for the high-light level. The higher level of blue light suppressed melatonin more quickly, to a greater extent over the course of the 90 min exposure period, and maintained suppression after 60 min. The constant exposure of the low-light level resulted in a decrease in nocturnal melatonin suppression for the last sampling time, whereas for the high-light level, suppression continued throughout the entire exposure period. The present study performed with healthy adults suggests that the tested personal light-treatment device might be a practical, comfortable, and effective way to deliver light treatment to those suffering from circadian sleep disorders; however, the acceptance and effectiveness of personal light-treatment devices by older people and by other segments of the population suffering from sleep disorders in a real-life situation need to be directly tested. (Author correspondence: figuem@rpi.edu)     

Photochemical Damage in the Albino Rat Retina: Morphological Changes and Endogenous Amino Acids

Abstract: Endogenous amino acids were measured in retinas of rats exposed for up to 48 h to fluorescent light. Typical light damage was seen in photo–receptor cells after 30 h exposure to a maximum luminance of 1544 scotopic lux; and, from this time, taurine levels were significantly reduced. In contrast, the concentrations of other amino acids increased. After 18 h exposure to light, GABA, glycine, glutamate, and aspartate levels were raised in the photo-receptor cells, and GABA, glutamate, and glutamine levels in the inner retina. When ‘exposed’ animals were returned to their normal environment for 72 h, photoreceptor degeneration progressed and taurine concentrations were further reduced: the results suggest that the loss was from damaged photo–receptor cells. At this time the concentrations of the other amino acids measured had, in general, returned to normal     

Diurnal Variations in Cyclic AMP and Melatonin Content of Golden Hamster Retina

Abstract: The diurnal variations and photic regulation of cyclic AMP and melatonin content in golden hamster retina were studied. Both parameters showed significant diurnal variations with maximal values at night. Light exposure during the night inhibited retinal cyclic AMP and melatonin levels, whereas exposure to darkness during the day significantly increased cyclic AMP and melatonin content. Incubation with melatonin of retinas excised at different intervals indicated that the methoxyindole inhibited cyclic AMP accumulation in a time-dependent manner. The inhibitory effect of melatonin at 2400 h and at noon showed a threshold concentration of 1 and 10 pM, respectively. At 0400 h melatonin did not affect cyclic AMP accumulation. The results indicate a diurnal variability of retinal cyclic AMP and melatonin content in hamsters, mainly influenced by a photic stimulus. Cyclic AMP could be a putative second messenger for melatonin action in golden hamster retina.     

Hypersensitivity of melatonin suppression in response to light in patients with delayed sleep phase syndrome

Patients with delayed sleep phase syndrome (DSPS) experience a chronic mismatch between the usual daily schedule required by the individual's environment and their circadian sleep-wake pattern, resulting in major academic, work, and social problems. Although functional abnormalities of the circadian pacemaker system have been reported in patients with DSPS, the etiology of DSPS has not been fully elucidated. One hypothesis proposed to explain why patients with DSPS fail to synchronize their 24h sleep-wake cycle to their environment is that they might have reduced sensitivity to environmental time cues, most notably light-dark cycles. Therefore, we compared the sensitivity of melatonin suppression in response to light in patients with DSPS and normal control subjects. Fifteen patients with DSPS and age- and sex-matched healthy controls were studied. As the melatonin secretion rhythm in patients with DSPS was expected to be delayed compared to the controls, the time of peak melatonin secretion was determined in each subject in the first session. In the second session, each subject was exposed to light with an intensity of 1000 lux for 2h beginning 2h prior to his or her peak melatonin secretion. Melatonin was measured by radioimmunoassay in saliva sampled every 30 minutes during the period of light exposure. Suppression of the melatonin concentration in saliva was dependent on duration of light exposure. In addition, the suppressive effect of light on the melatonin concentration was significantly greater in patients with DSPS than in control subjects. The results suggest hypersensitivity to nighttime light exposure in patients with this syndrome. Our findings therefore suggest that evening light restriction is important for preventing patients with DSPS from developing a sleep phase delay. (Chronobiology International, 18(2), 263-271, 2001)     

Effects of day-time exposure to different light intensities on light-induced melatonin suppression at night

Background

Bright nocturnal light has been known to suppress melatonin secretion. However, bright light exposure during the day-time might reduce light-induced melatonin suppression (LIMS) at night. The effective proportion of day-time light to night-time light is unclear; however, only a few studies on accurately controlling both day- and night-time conditions have been conducted. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different day-time light intensities on LIMS.

Methods

Twelve male subjects between the ages of 19 and 23 years (mean ± S.D., 20.8 ± 1.1) gave informed consent to participate in this study. They were exposed to various light conditions (<10, 100, 300, 900 and 2700 lx) between the hours of 09:00 and 12:00 (day-time light conditions). They were then exposed to bright light (300 lx) again between 01:00 and 02:30 (night-time light exposure). They provided saliva samples before (00:55) and after night-time light exposure (02:30).

Results

A one-tailed paired t test yielded significant decrements of melatonin concentration after night-time light exposure under day-time dim, 100- and 300-lx light conditions. No significant differences exist in melatonin concentration between pre- and post-night-time light exposure under day-time 900- and 2700-lx light conditions.

Conclusions

Present findings suggest the amount of light exposure needed to prevent LIMS caused by ordinary nocturnal light in individuals who have a general life rhythm (sleep/wake schedule). These findings may be useful in implementing artificial light environments for humans in, for example, hospitals and underground shopping malls.     

Less Exposure to Daily Ambient Light in Winter Increases Sensitivity of Melatonin to Light Suppression

This study was carried out to examine the seasonal difference in the magnitude of the suppression of melatonin secretion induced by exposure to light in the late evening. The study was carried out in Akita (39° North, 140° East), in the northern part of Japan, where the duration of sunshine in winter is the shortest. Ten healthy male university students (mean age: 21.9±1.2 yrs) volunteered to participate twice in the study in winter (from January to February) and summer (from June to July) 2004. According to Japanese meteorological data, the duration of sunshine in Akita in the winter (50.5 h/month) is approximately one‐third of that in summer (159.7 h/month). Beginning one week prior to the start of the experiment, the level of daily ambient light to which each subject was exposed was recorded every minute using a small light sensor that was attached to the subject's wrist. In the first experiment, saliva samples were collected every hour over a period of 24 h in a dark experimental room (<15 lux) to determine peak salivary melatonin concentration. The second experiment was conducted after the first experiment to determine the percentage of melatonin suppression induced by exposure to light. The starting time of exposure to light was set 2 h before the time of peak salivary melatonin concentration detected in the first experiment. The subjects were exposed to light (1000 lux) for 2 h using white fluorescent lamps (4200 K). The percentage of suppression of melatonin by light was calculated on the basis of the melatonin concentration determined before the start of exposure to light. The percentage of suppression of melatonin 2 h after the start of exposure to light was significantly greater in winter (66.6±18.4%) than summer (37.2±33.2%), p<0.01). The integrated level of daily ambient light from rising time to bedtime in summer was approximately twice that in winter. The results suggest that the increase in suppression of melatonin by light in winter is caused by less exposure to daily ambient light.     

HYPERSENSITIVITY OF MELATONIN SUPPRESSION IN RESPONSE TO LIGHT IN PATIENTS WITH DELAYED SLEEP PHASE SYNDROME*

Patients with delayed sleep phase syndrome (DSPS) experiencea chronic mismatch between the usual daily schedule required by the individual'senvironment and their circadian sleep-wake pattern, resulting in major academic,work, and social problems. Although functional abnormalities of the circadianpacemaker system have been reported in patients with DSPS, the etiology ofDSPS has not been fully elucidated. One hypothesis proposed to explain whypatients with DSPS fail to synchronize their 24h sleep-wake cycle to theirenvironment is that they might have reduced sensitivity to environmental timecues, most notably light-dark cycles. Therefore, we compared the sensitivityof melatonin suppression in response to light in patients with DSPS and normalcontrol subjects. Fifteen patients with DSPS and age- and sex-matched healthycontrols were studied. As the melatonin secretion rhythm in patients withDSPS was expected to be delayed compared to the controls, the time of peakmelatonin secretion was determined in each subject in the first session. Inthe second session, each subject was exposed to light with an intensity of1000 lux for 2h beginning 2h prior to his or her peak melatonin secretion.Melatonin was measured by radioimmunoassay in saliva sampled every 30 minutesduring the period of light exposure. Suppression of the melatonin concentrationin saliva was dependent on duration of light exposure. In addition, the suppressiveeffect of light on the melatonin concentration was significantly greater inpatients with DSPS than in control subjects. The results suggest hypersensitivityto nighttime light exposure in patients with this syndrome. Our findings thereforesuggest that evening light restriction is important for preventing patientswith DSPS from developing a sleep phase delay. (ChronobiologyInternational, 18(2), 263–271, 2001)     

Effects of different light intensities in the morning on dim light melatonin onset

The present study evaluated the effects of exposure to light intensity in the morning on dim light melatonin onset (DLMO). The tested light intensities were 750 lux, 150 lux, 3000 lux, 6000 lux and 12,000 lux (horizontal illuminance at cornea), using commercial 5000 K fluorescent lamps. Eleven healthy males aged 21-31 participated in 2-day experiments for each light condition. On the first experimental day (day 1), subjects were exposed to dim light (<30 lux) for 3 h in the morning (09:00-12:00). On the same day, saliva samples were taken in dim light (<30 lux) every 30 min from 21:00 to 01:00 to determine the DLMO phase. The subjects were allowed to sleep from 01:00 to 08:00. On the second experimental day (day 2), the subjects were exposed to experimental light conditions for 3 h in the morning. The experimental schedule after light exposure was the same as on day 1. On comparing day 2 with day 1, significant phase advances of DLMO were obtained at 3000 lux, 6000 lux and 12,000 lux. These findings indicate that exposure to a necessary intensity from an ordinary light source, such as a fluorescent lamp, in the morning within one day affects melatonin secretion.