Effect of the N1 residue on the stability of the alpha-helix for all 20 amino acids

N1 is the first residue in an alpha-helix. We have measured the contribution of all 20 amino acids to the stability of a small helical peptide CH(3)CO-XAAAAQAAAAQAAGY-NH(2) at the N1 position. By substituting every residue into the N1 position, we were able to investigate the stabilizing role of each amino acid in an isolated context. The helix content of each of the 20 peptides was measured by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. The data were analyzed by our modified Lifson-Roig helix-coil theory, which includes the n1 parameter, to find free energies for placing a residue into the N1 position. The rank order for free energies is Asp(-), Ala > Glu(-) > Glu(0) > Trp, Leu, Ser > Asp(0), Thr, Gln, Met, Ile > Val, Pro > Lys(+), Arg, His(0) > Cys, Gly > Phe > Asn, Tyr, His(+). N1 preferences are clearly distinct from preferences for the preceding N-cap and alpha-helix interior. pK(a) values were measured for Asp, Glu, and His, and protonation-free energies were calculated for Asp and Glu. The dissociation of the Asp proton is less favorable than that of Glu, and this reflects its involvement in a stronger stabilizing interaction at the N terminus. Proline is not energetically favored at the alpha-helix N terminus despite having a high propensity for this position in crystal structures. The data presented are of value both in rationalizing mutations at N1 alpha-helix sites in proteins and in predicting the helix contents of peptides.     

Effect of the N2 residue on the stability of the α-helix for all 20 amino acids

N2 is the second position in the alpha-helix. All 20 amino acids were placed in the N2 position of a synthetic helical peptide (CH(3)CO-[AXAAAAKAAAAKAAGY]-NH(2)) and the helix content was measured by circular dichroism spectroscopy at 273K. The dependence of peptide helicity on N2 residue identity has been used to determine a free-energy scale by analysis with a modified Lifson-Roig helix-coil theory that includes a parameter for the N2 energy (n2). The rank order of DeltaDeltaG((relative to Ala)) is Glu(-), Asp(-) > Ala > Glu(0), Leu, Val, Gln, Thr, Ile, Ser, Met, Asp(0), His(0), Arg, Cys, Lys, Phe > Asn, > Gly, His(+), Pro, Tyr. The results correlate very well with N2 propensities in proteins, moderately well with N1 and helix interior preferences, and not at all with N-cap preferences. The strongest energetic effects result from interactions with the helix dipole, which favors negative charges at the helix N terminus. Hydrogen bonds to side chains at N2, such as Gln, Ser, and Thr, are weak, despite occurring frequently in protein crystal structures, in contrast to the N-cap position. This is because N-cap hydrogen bonds are close to linear, whereas N2 hydrogen bonds have poor geometry. These results can be used to modify protein stability rationally, help design helices, and improve prediction of helix location and stability.     

Determination of alpha-helix N1 energies after addition of N1, N2, and N3 preferences to helix/coil theory

Surveys of protein crystal structures have revealed that amino acids show unique structural preferences for the N1, N2, and N3 positions in the first turn of the alpha-helix. We have therefore extended helix-coil theory to include statistical weights for these locations. The helix content of a peptide in this model is a function of N-cap, C-cap, N1, N2, N3, C1, and helix interior (N4 to C2) preferences. The partition function for the system is calculated using a matrix incorporating the weights of the fourth residue in a hexamer of amino acids and is implemented using a FORTRAN program. We have applied the model to calculate the N1 preferences of Gln, Val, Ile, Ala, Met, Pro, Leu, Thr, Gly, Ser, and Asn, using our previous data on helix contents of peptides Ac-XAKAAAAKAAGY-CONH2. We find that Ala has the highest preference for the N1 position. Asn is the most unfavorable, destabilizing a helix at N1 by at least 1.4 kcal mol(-1) compared to Ala. The remaining amino acids all have similar preferences, 0.5 kcal mol(-1) less than Ala. Gln, Asn, and Ser, therefore, do not stabilize the helix when at N1.     

Amino acid intrinsic alpha-helical propensities III: positional dependence at several positions of C terminus

In this study, we have analyzed experimentally the helical intrinsic propensities of non-charged and non-aromatic residues at different C-terminal positions (C1, C2, C3) of an Ala-based peptide. The effect was found to be complex, resulting in extra stabilization or destabilization, depending on guest amino acid and position under consideration. Polar (Ser, Thr, Cys, Asn, and Gln) amino acids and Gly were found to have significantly larger helical propensities at several C-terminal positions compared with the alpha-helix center (-1.0 kcal/mole in some cases). Some of the nonpolar residues, especially beta-branched ones (Val and Ile) are significantly more favorable at position C3 (-0.3 to -0.4 kcal/mole), although having minor differences at other C-terminal positions compared with the alpha-helix center. Leu has moderate (-0.1 to -0.2 kcal/mole) stabilization effects at position C2 and C3, whereas being relatively neutral at C1. Finally, Met was found to be unfavorable at C1 and C2 ( +0.2 kcal/mole) and favorable at C3 (-0.2 kcal/mole). Thus, significant differences found between the intrinsic helical propensities at the C-terminal positions and those in the alpha-helix center must be accounted for in helix/coil transition theories and in protein design.     

Side-chain structures in the first turn of the alpha-helix

The first three residues at the N terminus of the alpha-helix are called N1, N2 and N3. We surveyed 2102 alpha-helix N termini in 298 high-resolution, non-homologous protein crystal structures for N1, N2 and N3 amino acid and side-chain rotamer propensities and hydrogen-bonding patterns. We find strong structural preferences that are unique to these sites. The rotamer distributions as a function of amino acid identity and position in the helix are often explained in terms of hydrogen-bonding interactions to the free N1, N2 and N3 backbone NH groups. Notably, the "good N2" amino acid residues Gln, Glu, Asp, Asn, Ser, Thr and His preferentially form i, i or i,i+1 hydrogen bonds to the backbone, though this is hindered by good N-caps (Asp, Asn, Ser, Thr and Cys) that compete for these hydrogen bond donors. We find a number of specific side-chain to side-chain interactions between N1 and N2 or between the N-cap and N2 or N3, such as Arg(N-cap) to Asp(N2). The strong energetic and structural preferences found for N1, N2 and N3, which differ greatly from positions within helix interiors, suggest that these sites should be treated explicitly in any consideration of helical structure in peptides or proteins.     

Stable proline box motif at the N-terminal end of alpha-helices.

We describe a novel N-terminal alpha-helix local motif that involves three hydrophobic residues and a Pro residue (Pro-box motif). Database analysis shows that when Pro is the N-cap of an alpha-helix the distribution of amino acids in adjacent positions changes dramatically with respect to the average distribution in an alpha-helix, but not when Pro is at position N1. N-cap Pro residues are usually associated to Ile and Leu, at position N', Val at position N3 and a hydrophobic residue (h) at position N4. The side chain of the N-cap Pro packs against Val, while the hydrophobic residues at positions N' and N4 make favorable interactions. To analyze the role of this putative motif (sequence fingerprint hPXXhh), we have synthesized a series of peptides and analyzed them by circular dichroism (CD) and NMR. We find that this motif is formed in peptides, and that the accompanying hydrophobic interactions contribute up to 1.2 kcal/mol to helix stability. The fact that some of the residues in this fingerprint are not good N-cap and helix formers results in a small overall stabilization of the alpha-helix with respect to other peptides having Gly as the N-cap and Ala at N3 and N4. This suggests that the Pro-box motif will not specially contribute to protein stability but to the specificity of its fold. In fact, 80% of the sequences that contain the fingerprint sequence in the protein database are adopting the described structural motif, and in none of them is the helix extended to place Pro at the more favorable N1 position.     

Characterization of a synthetic peptide corresponding to a receptor binding domain of mouse interferon gamma.

A receptor binding region of mouse interferon gamma (IFN gamma) has previously been localized to the N-terminal 39 amino acids of the molecule by use of synthetic peptides and monoclonal antibodies. In this report, a detailed analysis of the synthetic peptide corresponding to this region, IFN gamma (1-39), is presented. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy indicated that the peptide has stable secondary structure under aqueous conditions and adopts a combination of alpha-helical and random structure. A peptide lacking two N-terminal amino acids, IFN gamma (3-39), had similar secondary structure and equivalent ability to compete for receptor binding, while peptides lacking four or more N-terminal residues had reduced alpha-helical structure and did not inhibit 125I-IFN gamma binding. Substitution of proline, a helix-destabilizing amino acid, for leucine (residue 8) of a predicted amphipathic alpha-helix (residues 3-12), IFN gamma (1-39) [Pro]8, resulted in a substantial reduction in the helical content of the peptide, supporting the presence of helical structure in this region. However, destabilization of the helix did not reduce the competitive ability of the peptide. A peptide lacking eight C-terminal residues, IFN gamma (1-31), did not block 125I-IFN gamma binding and had no detectable alpha-helical structure, suggesting a requirement of the predicted second alpha-helix (residues 20-34) for receptor interaction and helix stabilization. Substitution of phenylalanine for tyrosine at position 14, IFN gamma (1-39) [Phe]14, a central location of a predicted omega-loop structure, did not affect the secondary structure associated with the region yet resulted in a 30-fold increase in receptor competition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Structure, stability and folding of the alpha-helix

Pauling first described the alpha-helix nearly 50 years ago, yet new features of its structure continue to be discovered, using peptide model systems, site-directed mutagenesis, advances in theory, the expansion of the Protein Data Bank and new experimental techniques. Helical peptides in solution form a vast number of structures, including fully helical, fully coiled and partly helical. To interpret peptide results quantitatively it is essential to use a helix/coil model that includes the stabilities of all these conformations. Our models now include terms for helix interiors, capping, side-chain interactions, N-termini and 3(10)-helices. The first three amino acids in a helix (N1, N2 and N3) and the preceding N-cap are unique, as their amide NH groups do not participate in backbone hydrogen bonding. We surveyed their structures in proteins and measured their amino acid preferences. The results are predominantly rationalized by hydrogen bonding to the free NH groups. Stabilizing side-chain-side-chain energies, including hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding and polar/non-polar interactions, were measured accurately in helical peptides. Helices in proteins show a preference for having approximately an integral number of turns so that their N- and C-caps lie on the same side. There are also strong periodic trends in the likelihood of terminating a helix with a Schellman or alpha L C-cap motif. The kinetics of alpha-helix folding have been studied with stopped-flow deep ultraviolet circular dichroism using synchrotron radiation as the light source; this gives a far superior signal-to-noise ratio than a conventional instrument. We find that poly(Glu), poly(Lys) and alanine-based peptides fold in milliseconds, with longer peptides showing a transient overshoot in helix content.     

Position dependence of amino acid intrinsic helical propensities II: non-charged polar residues: Ser, Thr, Asn, and Gln.

The assumption that the intrinsic alpha-helical propensities of the amino acids are position independent was critical in several helix/coil transition theories. In the first paper of these series, we reported that this is not the case for Gly and nonpolar aliphatic amino acids (Val, Leu, Met, and Ile). Here we have analyzed the helical intrinsic propensities of noncharged polar residues (Ser, Thr, Asn, and Gln) at different positions of a model polyalanine-based peptide. We found that Thr is more favorable (by approximately 0.3 kcal/mol) at positions N1 and N2 than in the helix center, although for Ser, Asn, and Gln the differences are smaller (+/-0.2 kcal/mol), and in many cases within the experimental error. There is a reasonable agreement (+/-0.2 kcal/mol) between the calculated free energies, using the ECEPP/2 force field equipped with a hydration potential, and the experimental data, except at position N1.     

The sequence TGAAKAVALVL from glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase displays structural ambivalence and interconverts between alpha-helical and beta-hairpin conformations mediated by collapsed conformational states.

The peptide TGAAKAVALVL from glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase adopts a helical conformation in the crystal structure and is a site for two hydrated helical segments, which are thought to be helical folding intermediates. Overlapping sequences of four to five residues from the peptide, sample both helical and strand conformations in known protein structures, which are dissimilar to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase suggesting that the peptide may have a structural ambivalence. Molecular dynamics simulations of the peptide sequence performed for a total simulation time of 1.2 micros, starting from the various initial conformations using GROMOS96 force field under NVT conditions, show that the peptide samples a large number of conformational forms with transitions from alpha-helix to beta-hairpin and vice versa. The peptide, therefore, displays a structural ambivalence. The mechanism from alpha-helix to beta-hairpin transition and vice versa reveals that the compact bends and turns conformational forms mediate such conformational transitions. These compact structures including helices and hairpins have similar hydrophobic radius of gyration (Rgh) values suggesting that similar hydrophobic interactions govern these conformational forms. The distribution of conformational energies is Gaussian with helix sampling lowest energy followed by the hairpins and coil. The lowest potential energy of the full helix may enable the peptide to take up helical conformation in the crystal structure of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, even though the peptide has a preference for hairpin too. The relevance of folding and unfolding events observed in our simulations to hydrophobic collapse model of protein folding are discussed.     

Addition of side-chain interactions to 3(10)-helix/coil and alpha-helix/3(10)-helix/coil theory.

An increasing number of experimental and theoretical studies have demonstrated the importance of the 3(10)-helix/ alpha-helix/coil equilibrium for the structure and folding of peptides and proteins. One way to perturb this equilibrium is to introduce side-chain interactions that stabilize or destabilize one helix. For example, an attractive i, i + 4 interaction, present only in the alpha-helix, will favor the alpha-helix over 3(10), while an i, i + 4 repulsion will favor the 3(10)-helix over alpha. To quantify the 3(10)/alpha/coil equilibrium, it is essential to use a helix/coil theory that considers the stability of every possible conformation of a peptide. We have previously developed models for the 3(10)-helix/coil and 3(10)-helix/alpha-helix/ coil equilibria. Here we extend this work by adding i, i + 3 and i, i + 4 side-chain interaction energies to the models. The theory is based on classifying residues into alpha-helical, 3(10)-helical, or nonhelical (coil) conformations. Statistical weights are assigned to residues in a helical conformation with an associated helical hydrogen bond, a helical conformation with no hydrogen bond, an N-cap position, a C-cap position, or the reference coil conformation plus i, i + 3 and i, i + 4 side-chain interactions. This work may provide a framework for quantitatively rationalizing experimental work on isolated 3(10)-helices and mixed 3(10)-/alpha-helices and for predicting the locations and stabilities of these structures in peptides and proteins. We conclude that strong i, i + 4 side-chain interactions favor alpha-helix formation, while the 3(10)-helix population is maximized when weaker i, i + 4 side-chain interactions are present.     

Sequence and conformational preferences at termini of α‐helices in membrane proteins: Role of the helix environment

α‐helices are amongst the most common secondary structural elements seen in membrane proteins and are packed in the form of helix bundles. These α‐helices encounter varying external environments (hydrophobic, hydrophilic) that may influence the sequence preferences at their N and C‐termini. The role of the external environment in stabilization of the helix termini in membrane proteins is still unknown. Here we analyze α‐helices in a high‐resolution dataset of integral α‐helical membrane proteins and establish that their sequence and conformational preferences differ from those in globular proteins. We specifically examine these preferences at the N and C‐termini in helices initiating/terminating inside the membrane core as well as in linkers connecting these transmembrane helices. We find that the sequence preferences and structural motifs at capping (Ncap and Ccap) and near‐helical (N' and C') positions are influenced by a combination of features including the membrane environment and the innate helix initiation and termination property of residues forming structural motifs. We also find that a large number of helix termini which do not form any particular capping motif are stabilized by formation of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions contributed from the neighboring helices in the membrane protein. We further validate the sequence preferences obtained from our analysis with data from an ultradeep sequencing study that identifies evolutionarily conserved amino acids in the rat neurotensin receptor. The results from our analysis provide insights for the secondary structure prediction, modeling and design of membrane proteins. Proteins 2014; 82:3420–3436. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

CD and NMR investigations on trifluoroethanol-induced step-wise folding of helical segment from scorpion neurotoxin.

A 14 amino acid residue peptide from the helical region of Scorpion neurotoxin has been structurally characterized using CD and NMR spectroscopy in different solvent conditions. 2,2,2-Trifluoroethanol (TFE) titration has been carried out in 11 steps from 0 to 90% TFE and the gradual stabilization of the conformation to form predominantly alpha-helix covering all of the 14 residues has been studied by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy. Detailed information such as coupling constants, chemical shift indices, NOESY peak intensities and amide proton temperature coefficients at each TFE concentration has been extracted and analysed to derive the step-wise preferential stabilization of the helical segments along the length of the peptide. It was found that there is a finite amount of the helical conformation in the middle residues 5-11 even at low TFE concentrations. It was also observed that > 75% TFE (v/v) is required for the propagation of the helix to the N and C termini and for correct packing of the side chains of all of the residues. These observations are significant to understanding the folding of this segment in the protein and may throw light on the inherent preferences and side chain interactions in the formation of the helix in the peptide.     

Occurrence,conformational features and amino acid propensities for the pi-helix

The most abundant helix type in proteins is the alpha-helix, accounting for about 31% of amino acid secondary structure states, while the 3(10)-helix accounts for about 4%. The pi-helix appears to be extremely rare and is considered to be unstable. Existing secondary structure definition methods find very few within the Protein Data Bank. Using an improved pi-helix definition algorithm to search a non-redundant subset of high-resolution and well-refined protein structures, we found that almost every tenth protein contained a pi-helix. This enabled us to show for the first time that the pi-helix has structural parameters that are different from the hypothesized model values. It also has distinctive amino acid preferences and it is conserved within functionally related proteins. Features that may contribute to the stability of the pi-helical structure have also been identified. In addition to hydrogen bonds, several other factors contribute to the stability of pi-helices. The pi-helix may have some functional advantages over other helical structures. Thus, we describe cases where the side chains of functionally important residues at every fourth position within a pi-helix could be aligned and brought close together in a way that would not be allowed by any other helix type.     

Addition of side chain interactions to modified Lifson-Roig helix-coil theory: application to energetics of phenylalanine-methionine interactions.

We introduce here i, i + 3 and i, i + 4 side chain interactions into the modified Lifson-Roig helix-coil theory of Doig et al. (1994, Biochemistry 33:3396-3403). The helix/coil equilibrium is a function of initiation, propagation, capping, and side chain interaction parameters. If each of these parameters is known, the helix content of any isolated peptide can be predicted. The model considers every possible conformation of a peptide, is not limited to peptides with only a single helical segment, and has physically meaningful parameters. We apply the theory to measure the i, i + 4 interaction energies between Phe and Met side chains. Peptides with these residues spaced i, i + 4 are significantly more helical than controls where they are spaced i, i + 5. Application of the model yields delta G for the Phe-Met orientation to be -0.75 kcal.mol-1, whereas that for the Met-Phe orientation is -0.54 kcal.mol-1. These orientational preferences can be explained, in part, by rotamer preferences for the interacting side chains. We place Phe-Met i, i + 4 at the N-terminus, the C-terminus, and in the center of the host peptide. The model quantitatively predicts the observed helix contents using a single parameter for the side chain-side chain interaction energy. This result indicates that the model works well even when the interaction is at different locations in the helix.     

Characterization of a membrane protein folding motif, the Ser zipper, using designed peptides

Polar residues play important roles in the association of transmembrane helices and the stabilities of membrane proteins. Although a single Ser residue in a transmembrane helix is unable to mediate a strong association of the helices, the cooperative interactions of two or more appropriately placed serine hydroxyl groups per helix has been hypothesized to allow formation of a "serine zipper" that can stabilize transmembrane helix association. In particular, a heptad repeat Sera Xxx Xxx Leud Xxx Xxx Xxx (Xxx is a hydrophobic amino acid) appears in both antiparallel helical pairs of polytopic membrane proteins as well as the parallel helical dimerization motif found in the murine erythropoietin receptor. To examine the intrinsic conformational preferences of this motif independent of its context within a larger protein, we synthesized a peptide containing three copies of a SeraLeud heptad motif. Computational results are consistent with the designed peptide adopting either a parallel or antiparallel structure, and conformational search calculations yield the parallel dimer as the lowest energy configuration, which is also significantly more stable than the parallel trimer. Analytical ultracentrifugation indicated that the peptide exists in a monomer-dimer equilibrium in dodecylphosphocholine micelles. Thiol disulfide interchange studies showed a preference for forming parallel dimers in micelles. In phospholipid vesicles, only the parallel dimer was formed. The stability of the SerZip peptide was studied in vesicles prepared from phosphatidylcholine (PC) lipids of different chain length: POPC (C16:0C18:1 PC) and DLPC (C12:0PC). The stability was greater in POPC, which has a good match between the length of the hydrophobic region of the peptide and the bilayer length. Finally, mutation to Ala of the Ser residues in the SerZip motif gave rise to a relatively small decrease in the stability of the dimer, indicating that packing interactions rather than hydrogen-bonding provided the primary driving force for association.     

Snorkeling preferences foster an amino acid composition bias in transmembrane helices

By analyzing transmembrane (TM) helices in known structures, we find that some polar amino acids are more frequent at the N terminus than at the C terminus. We propose the asymmetry occurs because most polar amino acids are better able to snorkel their polar atoms away from the membrane core at the N terminus than at the C terminus. Two findings lead us to this proposition: (1) side-chain conformations are influenced strongly by the N or C-terminal position of the amino acid in the bilayer, and (2) the favored snorkeling direction of an amino acid correlates well with its N to C-terminal composition bias. Our results suggest that TM helix predictions should incorporate an N to C-terminal composition bias, that rotamer preferences of TM side-chains are position-dependent, and that the ability to snorkel influences the evolutionary selection of amino acids for the helix N and C termini.     

IR spectroscopy of isotope-labeled helical peptides: probing the effect of N-acetylation on helix stability

The effect of N-acetylation on the conformation of alanine-rich helical peptides is examined using isotope-edited Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. A series of peptides with sequence AA(AAKAA)(3)AAY has been prepared; each peptide incorporates four (13)C-labeled alanines. These peptides have two amide I' bands in their FTIR spectra: one corresponding to the (12)C amino acids, and one assigned to the (13)C amino acids. The intensity and frequency of the (13)C amide I' band varies systematically with the position of the labels in the sequence and the presence or absence of an N-acetyl capping group. The intensity of the (13)C amide I' band correlates with helix stability at the labeled residues as predicted by thermodynamic models of the helix-coil transition. These results suggest that FTIR spectroscopy combined with specific isotope labeling can be used to dissect the conformation of helical peptides at the residue level.     

A Monte Carlo Study of the Relative Stability of Protein Helical Forms

We present simulation results on a simple model to describe the hydrogen bonding in proteins with helical structures. The approximation distinguishes between ! helices, where each amino acid interacts with another one located four residues apart, 3 10 structures, where the number of amino acids in between is three, and the ? arrangement, in which that number is five. We found that the main features of the system are determined by the most stable structure (the ! helix) and that the other type of hydrogen bonds appears just below the denaturation temperature of the peptide. The probability of finding a 3 10 -type bond is greater at the beginning or at the end of the peptide chain, irrespectively of its length, while in short peptides the existence of those bonds increases appreciably the denaturation temperature, promoting stability. On the other hand, the temperature of denaturation decreases with the length of the peptide to reach a value independent of the number of amino acid residues.     

Amino acid conformational preferences and solvation of polar backbone atoms in peptides and proteins

Amino acids in peptides and proteins display distinct preferences for alpha-helical, beta-strand, and other conformational states. Various physicochemical reasons for these preferences have been suggested: conformational entropy, steric factors, hydrophobic effect, and backbone electrostatics; however, the issue remains controversial. It has been proposed recently that the side-chain-dependent solvent screening of the local and non-local backbone electrostatic interactions primarily determines the preferences not only for the alpha-helical but also for all other main-chain conformational states. Side-chains modulate the electrostatic screening of backbone interactions by excluding the solvent from the vicinity of main-chain polar atoms. The deficiency of this electrostatic screening model of amino acid preferences is that the relationships between the main-chain electrostatics and the amino acid preferences have been demonstrated for a limited set of six non-polar amino acid types in proteins only. Here, these relationships are determined for all amino acid types in tripeptides, dekapeptides, and proteins. The solvation free energies of polar backbone atoms are approximated by the electrostatic contributions calculated by the finite difference Poisson-Boltzmann and the Langevin dipoles methods. The results show that the average solvation free energy of main-chain polar atoms depends strongly on backbone conformation, shape of side-chains, and exposure to solvent. The equilibrium between the low-energy beta-strand conformation of an amino acid (anti-parallel alignment of backbone dipole moments) and the high-energy alpha conformation (parallel alignment of backbone dipole moments) is strongly influenced by the solvation of backbone polar atoms. The free energy cost of reaching the alpha conformation is by approximately 1.5 kcal/mol smaller for residues with short side-chains than it is for the large beta-branched amino acid residues. This free energy difference is comparable to those obtained experimentally by mutation studies and is thus large enough to account for the distinct preferences of amino acid residues. The screening coefficients gamma(local)(r) and gamma(non-local)(r) correlate with the solvation effects for 19 amino acid types with the coefficients between 0.698 to 0.851, depending on the type of calculation and on the set of point atomic charges used. The screening coefficients gamma(local)(r) increase with the level of burial of amino acids in proteins, converging to 1.0 for the completely buried amino acid residues. The backbone solvation free energies of amino acid residues involved in strong hydrogen bonding (for example: in the middle of an alpha-helix) are small. The hydrogen bonded backbone is thus more hydrophobic than the peptide groups in random coil. The alpha-helix forming preference of alanine is attributed to the relatively small free energy cost of reaching the high-energy alpha-helix conformation. These results confirm that the side-chain-dependent solvent screening of the backbone electrostatic interactions is the dominant factor in determining amino acid conformational preferences.