Heterogeneity of constitutive heterochromatin in somatic Syrian hamster chromosomes.

Syrian hamster constitutive heterochromatin was analyzed for C-band distribution and for BrU late-replication pattern. Characteristic for this species is relatively large amounts of sex-chromosome and autosomal heterochromatin. The distribution of constitutive heterochromatin was determined. The long term of the X chromosome, the whole Y, the short arms of 8 autosomal pairs, the long arm of the smallest metacentric pair, and the centromeric regions of 12 pairs stained intensely dark on C-band preparations. In contrast to the heterochromatin in the centromeric regions, the autosomal short-arm heterochromatin has an increased susceptibility to the denaturation process, as indicated by prolonged exposure to NaOH or Ba(OH)2. Such further exposure to denaturing agents results in an intense dark stain only on the sex-chromosome heterochromatin and centromeric regions of the autosomes. The BrdU late-replication pattern demonstrated that the late-replicating regions correspond to C-bands. Centromeric regions replicate late in the S phase; however, no centromeric region is among the latest replicating segments of the complement. Centromeric and noncentromeric heterochromatin are two distinct categories of constitutive heterochromatin.     

The consequences of differential origin licensing dynamics in distinct chromatin environments

Eukaryotic chromosomes contain regions of varying accessibility, yet DNA replication factors must access all regions. The first replication step is loading MCM complexes to license replication origins during the G1 cell cycle phase. It is not yet known how mammalian MCM complexes are adequately distributed to both accessible euchromatin regions and less accessible heterochromatin regions. To address this question, we combined time-lapse live-cell imaging with immunofluorescence imaging of single human cells to quantify the relative rates of MCM loading in euchromatin and heterochromatin throughout G1. We report here that MCM loading in euchromatin is faster than that in heterochromatin in early G1, but surprisingly, heterochromatin loading accelerates relative to euchromatin loading in middle and late G1. This differential acceleration allows both chromatin types to begin S phase with similar concentrations of loaded MCM. The different loading dynamics require ORCA-dependent differences in origin recognition complex distribution. A consequence of heterochromatin licensing dynamics is that cells experiencing a truncated G1 phase from premature cyclin E expression enter S phase with underlicensed heterochromatin, and DNA damage accumulates preferentially in heterochromatin in the subsequent S/G2 phase. Thus, G1 length is critical for sufficient MCM loading, particularly in heterochromatin, to ensure complete genome duplication and to maintain genome stability.     

Chromosome restriction enzyme digestion in domestic pig (Sus scrofa) constitutive heterochromatin arrangement

The bimodal karyotype of pig appears to contain two types of constitutive heterochromatin, reflecting different satellite DNA families: GC-rich heterochromatin located mainly in the centromeric regions of the biarmed chromosomes, and less-GC-rich heterochromatin in the centromeric regions of the one-armed chromosomes. In order to better discriminate this constitutive heterochromatin, we treated pig chromosome preparations with eight different restriction endonucleases, followed by C-banding. This technique allowed an expedited characterization of the constitutive heterochromatin and demonstrated its great heterogeneity in pig chromosomes. Our work allowed the detection and identification of twenty-two heterochromatin subclasses (twelve centromeric, four interstitial, five telomeric, and the Yq band). Moreover, several cryptic interstitial and telomeric bands were revealed. The work presented here is useful not only for fundamental studies of chromosome banding and constitutive heterochromatin, but also offers a new approach for pig clinical cytogenetics.     

Appearance and heterochromatin localization of HP1α in early mouse embryos depends on cytoplasmic clock and H3S10 phosphorylation

Pericentric constitutive heterochromatin surrounds centromeric regions and is important for centromere function and chromatid cohesion. HP1 (heterochromatin protein 1), a homolog of yeast Swi6, has been shown to be indispensible for proper heterochromatin structure and function. In mammalian somatic cells, two HP1 isoforms, HP1α and HP1β, are constitutively present in pericentric heterochromatin until late G₂, when they dissociate from heterochromatin. Subsequently, they re-associate with heterochromatin at late anaphase. In one-cell mouse embryos, pericentric heterochromatin has a unique configuration and features. It does not form heterochromatin clusters observed in somatic cells and known as chromocenters. Instead, in both pronuclei, it surrounds nucleolar precursor bodies (NBPs), forming ring-like structures. These regions contain HP1β but lack HP1α in both pronuclei. In subsequent interphases, HP1β is constitutively found in heterochromatin until the blastocyst stage. It is not known when HP1α appears and what is its function in early mouse embryos. Here, we show that HP1α appears for the first time at late S phase of two-cell stage, at the time when pericentric heterochromatin is replicated. Its appearance is regulated at the level of translation. In two-cell embryos, the amount of HP1α that can bind to these regions is regulated by phosphorylation of serine 10 of histone H3 (H3S10Ph). Elimination of HP1α by siRNA interfered with centromere relocation from heterochromatin surrounding NPBs to pro-chromocenters at the two-cell stage but did not affect preimplantation develoment to the blastocyst stage.     

SUMO modification is involved in the maintenance of heterochromatin stability in fission yeast

Several studies have suggested that SUMO may participate in the regulation of heterochromatin, but direct evidence is lacking. Here, we present a direct link between sumoylation and heterochromatin stability. SUMO deletion impaired silencing at heterochromatic regions and induced histone H3 Lys4 methylation, a hallmark of active chromatin in fission yeast. Our findings showed that the SUMO-conjugating enzyme Hus5/Ubc9 interacted with the conserved heterochromatin proteins Swi6, Chp2 (a paralog of Swi6), and Clr4 (H3 Lys9 methyltransferase). Moreover, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) revealed that Hus5 was highly enriched in heterochromatic regions in a heterochromatin-dependent manner, suggesting a direct role of Hus5 in heterochromatin formation. We also found that Swi6, Chp2, and Clr4 themselves can be sumoylated in vivo and defective sumoylation of Swi6 or Chp2 compromised silencing. These results indicate that Hus5 associates with heterochromatin through interactions with heterochromatin proteins and modifies substrates whose sumoylations are required for heterochromatin stability, including heterochromatin proteins themselves.     

Transcription of intercalary heterochromatin regions in Drosophila melanogaster cell culture

Labelled RNA preparations (total newly synthesized RNA, as well as stable cytoplasmic RNA) isolated from a cell culture of D. melanogaster were hybridized in situ with polytene chromosomes. Apart from the nucleolus, in all cases the regions adjacent to the chromocentre in the polytene chromosomes and the intercalary heterochromatin regions in the X chromosome and the autosomes are the most intensively labelled. In the case of asynapsis of polytene chromosomes in heterozygotes the label is detected in a number of intercalary heterochromatin sites in one homologue only ("the asymmetrical label"). The same kind of radioactivity distribution in intercalary heterochromatin regions was observed after a hybridization of polytene chromosomes with cloned DNA fragments (Ananiev et al., 1978, 1979) coding for the abundant classes of messenger RNA (Ilyin et al., 1978) in a cultured D. melanogaster cells. In some regions of intercalary heterochromatin which do not contain these fragments the "'asymmetrical" type of label distribution is observed after hybridization with cell RNA. - These results lead one to regard the intercalary heterochromatin regions as "nests" comprising different types of actively transcribable genes, the composition of each nest varying in different stocks of D. melanogaster.     

Changes in the properties of intercalary heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster induced by position effect modifiers

Compaction of chromosome regions translocated to the pericentric heterochromatin and the break frequency in intercalary heterochromatin (IH) regions as affected by position effect modifiers (low temperature, removing the Y chromosome, genetic enhancers and suppressors) were studied. It has been shown that the factors enhancing compaction also increase the break frequency in IH regions. Data obtained are discussed from the point of view of proteins affecting the compaction of intercalary and pericentric heterochromatin regions translocated to heterochromatin under position effect.     

Distorted heterochromatin replication in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes as a result of euchromatin-heterochromatin rearrangements

Studies of the position effect resulting from chromosome rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster have shown that replication distortions in polytene chromosomes correlate with heritable gene silencing in mitotic cells. Earlier studies mostly focused on the effects of euchromatin--heterochromatin rearrangements on replication and silencing of euchromatic regions adjacent to the heterochromatin breakpoint. This review is based on published original data and considers the effect of rearrangements on heterochromatin: heterochromatin blocks that are normally underrepresented or underreplicated in polytene chromosomes are restored. Euchromatin proved to affect heterochromatin, preventing its underreplication. The effect is opposite to the known inactivation effect, which extends from heterochromatin to euchromatin. The trans-action of heterochromatin blocks on replication of heterochromatin placed within euchromatin is discussed. Distortions of heterochromatin replication in polytene chromosomes are considered to be an important characteristic associated with the functional role of the corresponding genome regions.     

Phase transitions in heterochromatin organization

Heterochromatin formation has been proposed to involve phase transitions on the level of the three-dimensional folding of heterochromatin regions and the liquid–liquid demixing of heterochromatin proteins. Here, I outline the hallmarks of such transitions and the current challenges to detect them in living cells. I further discuss the abundance and properties of prominent heterochromatin proteins and relate them to their potential role in driving phase transitions. Recent data from mouse fibroblasts indicate that pericentric heterochromatin is organized via a reordering transition on the level of heterochromatin regions that does not necessarily involve liquid–liquid demixing of heterochromatin proteins. Evaluating key hallmarks of the different candidate phase transition mechanisms across cell types and species will be needed to complete the current picture.     

Intercalary heterochromatin in polytene chromosomes of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis>

Intercalary heterochromatin consists of extended chromosomal domains which are interspersed throughout the euchromatin and contain silent genetic material. These domains comprise either clusters of functionally unrelated genes or tandem gene duplications and possibly stretches of noncoding sequences. Strong repression of genetic activity means that intercalary heterochromatin displays properties that are normally attributable to classic pericentric heterochromatin: high compaction, late replication and underreplication in polytene chromosomes, and the presence of heterochromatin-specific proteins. Late replication and underreplication occurs when the suppressor of underreplication protein is present in intercalary heterochromatic regions. Intercalary heterochromatin underreplication in polytene chromosomes results in free double-stranded ends of DNA molecules; ligation of these free ends is the most likely mechanism for ectopic pairing between intercalary heterochromatic and pericentric heterochromatic regions. No support has been found for the view that the frequency of chromosome aberrations is elevated in intercalary heterochromatin.     

Reinterpreting pericentromeric heterochromatin

In fission yeast, pericentromeric heterochromatin is directly responsible for the sister chromatid cohesion that assures accurate chromosome segregation. In plants, however, heterochromatin and chromosome segregation appear to be largely unrelated: chromosome transmission is impaired by mutations in cohesion but not by mutations that affect heterochromatin formation. We argue that the formation of pericentromeric heterochromatin is primarily a response to constraints on chromosome mechanics that disfavor the transmission of recombination events in pericentromeric regions. This effect allows pericentromeres to expand to enormous sizes by the accumulation of transposons and through large-scale insertions and inversions. Although sister chromatid cohesion is spatially limited to pericentromeric regions at mitosis and meiosis II, the cohesive domains appear to be defined independently of heterochromatin. The available data from plants suggest that sister chromatid cohesion is marked by histone phosphorylation and mediated by Aurora kinases.     

Peptide Epitalon activates chromatin at the old age

OBJECTIVES and design. We have studied the effect of synthetic peptide Epitalon on the activity of ribosomal genes, denaturation parameters of total heterochromatin, polymorphism of structural C-heterochromatin and the variability of facultative heterochromatin in cultured lymphocytes of persons aged 76-80 years. RESULTS: The obtained data demonstrate that Epitalon induces the activation of ribosomal genes, decondensation of pericentromeric structural heterochromatin and the release of genes repressed due to the age-related condensation of euchromatic chromosome regions. CONCLUSIONS: Epitalon has shown its ability to activate chromatin by modifying heterochromatin and heterochromatinized chromosome regions in the cells of older persons.     

A strategy for mapping the heterochromatin of chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster

The heterochromatin of chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster has been among the best characterized models for functional studies of heterochromatin owing to its abundance of genetic markers. To determine whether it might also provide a favorable system for mapping extended regions of heterochromatin, we undertook a project to molecularly map the heterochromatin of the left arm of chromosome 2 (2Lh). In this paper, we describe a strategy that used clones and sequence information available from the Drosophila Genome Project and chromosome rearrangements to construct a map of the distal most portion of 2Lh. We also describe studies that used fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to examine the resolution of this technique for cytologically resolving heterochromatic sequences on mitotic chromosomes. We discuss how these mapping studies can be extended to more proximal regions of the heterochromatin to determine the structural patterns and physical dimensions of 2Lh and the relationship of structure to function.     

Chromosome banding in Amphibia

The distribution and quantity of constitutive heterochromatin and of the nucleolus organizer regions (NORs) on the chromosomes of 22 species of bufonids and hylids (Amphibia, Anura) was investigated. Three different kinds of constitutive heterochromatin were found and the frequency of brightly fluorescing heterochromatic regions was remarkably high. On almost all chromosomes there is centric and telomeric heterochromatin. Quantitative estimates of heterochromatin demonstrate that large DNA differences among closely related species can not be attributed to differing quantities of constitutive heterochromatin. In all species investigated, only one homologous pair of NORs was found, which lies preferentially in the proximal and interstitial segments of the long chromosome arms. The NORs are always associated with constitutive heterochromatin on both sides. The size variability between homologous NORs is very high. In the euchromatic regions of the metaphase chromosomes, neither Q- nor G-bands can be demonstrated; this can be attributed to an extremely strong contraction of the anuran chromosomes. On the basis of these results various mechanism of the chromosomal evolution in Anura are discussed.     

Reversible disruption of pericentric heterochromatin and centromere function by inhibiting deacetylases

Histone modifications might act to mark and maintain functional chromatin domains during both interphase and mitosis. Here we show that pericentric heterochromatin in mammalian cells is specifically responsive to prolonged treatment with deacetylase inhibitors. These defined regions relocate at the nuclear periphery and lose their properties of retaining HP1 (heterochromatin protein 1) proteins. Subsequent defects in chromosome segregation arise in mitosis. All these changes can reverse rapidly after drug removal. Our data point to a crucial role of histone underacetylation within pericentric heterochromatin regions for their association with HP1 proteins, their nuclear compartmentalization and their contribution to centromere function.     

Homolog pairing and sister chromatid cohesion in heterochromatin in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> male meiosis I

Drosophila males undergo meiosis without recombination or chiasmata but homologous chromosomes pair and disjoin regularly. The X–Y pair utilizes a specific repeated sequence within the heterochromatic ribosomal DNA blocks as a pairing site. No pairing sites have yet been identified for the autosomes. To search for such sites, we utilized probes targeting specific heterochromatic regions to assay heterochromatin pairing sequences and behavior in meiosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We found that the small fourth chromosome pairs at heterochromatic region 61 and associates with the X chromosome throughout prophase I. Homolog pairing of the fourth chromosome is disrupted when the homolog conjunction complex is perturbed by mutations in SNM or MNM. On the other hand, six tested heterochromatic regions of the major autosomes proved to be largely unpaired after early prophase I, suggesting that stable homolog pairing sites do not exist in heterochromatin of the major autosomes. Furthermore, FISH analysis revealed two distinct patterns of sister chromatid cohesion in heterochromatin: regions with stable cohesion and regions lacking cohesion. This suggests that meiotic sister chromatid cohesion is incomplete within heterochromatin and may occur at specific preferential sites.