Grandparental stem cells in leech segmentation: Differences in CDC42 expression are correlated with an alternating pattern of blast cell fates

Embryonic segmentation in clitellate annelids (oligochaetes and leeches) is a cell lineage-driven process. Embryos of these worms generate a posterior growth zone consisting of 5 bilateral pairs of identified segmentation stem cells (teloblasts), each of which produces a column of segmental founder cells (blast cells). Each blast cell generates a lineage-specific clone via a stereotyped sequence of cell divisions, which are typically unequal both in terms of the relative size of the sister cells and in the progeny to which they give rise. In two of the five teloblast lineages, including the ventralmost, primary neurogenic (N) lineage, the blast cells adopt two different fates, designated nf and ns, in exact alternation within the blast cell column; this is termed a grandparental stem cell lineage. To lay groundwork for investigating unequal divisions in the leech Helobdella, we have surveyed the Helobdella robusta genome for genes encoding orthologs of the Rho family GTPases, including the rho, rac and cdc42 sub-families, which are known to be involved in multiple processes involving cell polarization in other systems. We find that, in contrast to most other known systems the Helobdella genome contains two cdc42 orthologs, one of which is expressed at higher levels in the ns blast cells than in nf blast cells. We also demonstrate that the asymmetric divisions of the primary nf and ns blast cells are regulated by the polarized distribution of the activated form of the Cdc42 protein, rather than by the overall level of expression. Our results provide the first molecular insights into the mechanisms of the grandparental stem cell lineages, a novel, yet evolutionarily ancient stem cell division pattern. Our results also provide an example in which asymmetries in the distribution of Cdc42 activity, rather than in the overall levels of Cdc42 protein, are important regulating unequal divisions in animal cells.     

Cell lineage and segmentation in the leech

Segments in the leech arise by the proliferation of longitudinally arrayed bandlets of blast cells derived from ten identifiable embryonic stem cells, two M, two N, four O/P and two Q teloblasts. In each bandlet, older blast cells lie ahead of those born later. By using microinjected cell lineage tracers it was shown previously that the teloblasts give rise to characteristic cell patterns made up of segmentally iterated complements of progeny designated as M, N, O, P and Q kinship groups. When a teloblast is injected after it has begun generating blast cells, a boundary is observed later in development between anterior, unlabelled progeny of blast cells produced before injection and posterior, labelled progeny of blast cells produced after injection. We have examined such boundaries in detail to establish the precise relationship between blast cell clones and segments, with the following conclusions: (i) in the M, O and P cell lines, one blast cell generates one segmental complement of progeny, but serially homologous blast clones intermix so that no segment boundaries can be defined based on primary blast cell clones; (ii) in the N and Q cell lines, two blast cells are required to generate a complete segmental complement of progeny; (iii) in the process of forming the germinal plate, cells derived from the N and Q teloblasts move past those derived from the M and O/P teloblasts, so that consegmental blast cell clones do not come into register until well after the establishment of segmentally iterated units within each bandlet.     

Establishment of segment polarity in the ectoderm of the leech Helobdella

The segmented ectoderm and mesoderm of the leech arise via a stereotyped cell lineage from embryonic stem cells called teloblasts. Each teloblast gives rise to a column of primary blast cell daughters, and the blast cells generate descendant clones that serve as the segmental repeats of their particular teloblast lineage. We have examined the mechanism by which the leech primary blast cell clones acquire segment polarity - i.e. a fixed sequence of positional values ordered along the anteroposterior axis of the segmental repeat. In the O and P teloblast lineages, the earliest divisions of the primary blast cell segregate anterior and posterior cell fates along the anteroposterior axis. Using a laser microbeam, we ablated single cells from both o and p blast cell clones at stages when the clone was two to four cells in length. The developmental fate of the remaining cells was characterized with rhodamine-dextran lineage tracer. Twelve different progeny cells were ablated, and in every case the ablation eliminated the normal descendants of the ablated cell while having little or no detectable effect on the developmental fate of the remaining cells. This included experiments in which we specifically ablated those blast cell progeny that are known to express the engrailed gene, or their lineal precursors. These findings confirm and extend a previous study by showing that the establishment of segment polarity in the leech ectoderm is largely independent of cell interactions conveyed along the anteroposterior axis. Both intercellular signaling and engrailed expression play an important role in the segment polarity specification of the Drosophila embryo, and our findings suggest that there may be little or no conservation of this developmental mechanism between those two organisms.     

Micromere fate maps in leech embryos: lineage-specific differences in rates of cell proliferation

Stereotyped early cleavages in glossiphoniid leech embryos yield 25 micromeres, along with 3 macromeres and 10 teloblasts. The micromeres generate prostomial tissues and also give rise to most of the squamous epithelium of a provisional integument that spreads epibolically from the animal pole, covering the rest of the embryo during germinal plate formation.We systematically injected individual micromeres with fluorescent cell lineage tracers at the time of their birth and quantitatively mapped the contributions of all these cells to the late stage 7 embryo, a time in development that is early in the epibolic expansion. At this time, micromere derivatives comprise two types of cells: squamous epithelial (superficial) cells that cover the germinal bands and the region of the animal cap between the germinal bands; and underlying (deep) cells that are confined to the distal ends of the germinal bands and in the area between their distal ends. We find that individual micromeres contribute clones of deep and/or superficial progeny that are stereotyped with respect to both numbers and types of cells in the clone and the domains that they occupy. The N teloblasts also contribute cells to the squamous epithelium.We find significant differences in the rate of cell proliferation between different micromere clones. These differences appear to reflect lineage-specific traits, since there is little or no regulation of cell number after ablation of individual micromeres.     

Segmentation of the central nervous system in leech

Central nervous system (CNS) in leech comprises segmentally iterated progeny derived from five embryonic lineages (M, N, O, P and Q). Segmentation of the leech CNS is characterized by the formation of a series of transverse fissures that subdivide initially continuous columns of segmental founder cells in the N lineage into distinct ganglionic primordia. We have examined the relationship between the N lineage cells that separate to form the fissures and lateral ectodermal and mesodermal derivatives by differentially labeling cells with intracellular lineage tracers and antibodies. Although subsets of both lateral ectoderm and muscle fibers contact N lineage cells at or near the time of fissure formation, ablation experiments suggest that these contacts are not required for initiating fissure formation. It appears, therefore, that this aspect of segmentation occurs autonomously within the N lineage. To support this idea, we present evidence that fundamental differences exist between alternating ganglionic precursor cells (nf and ns primary blast cells) within the N lineage. Specifically, ablation of an nf primary blast cell sometimes resulted in the fusion of ipsilateral hemi-ganglia, while ablation of an ns primary blast cell often caused a 'slippage' of blast cells posterior to the lesion. Also, differences in cell behavior were observed in biochemically arrested nf and ns primary blast cells. Collectively, these results lead to a model of segmentation in the leech CNS that is based upon differences in cell adhesion and/or cell motility between the alternating nf and ns primary blast cells. We note that the segmentation processes described here occur well prior to the expression of the leech engrailed-class gene in the N lineage.     

Early differences between alternate n blast cells in leech embryo

Segmentally iterated tissues of the mature leech comprise five distinct sets of definitive progeny that arise from chains of blast cells (m, n, o, p, and q bandlets) produced by five bilateral pairs of stem cells (M, N, O/P, O/P, and Q teloblasts). In each n and q bandlet, two blast cells are needed to generate one set of hemisegmental progeny, and two alternating classes of blast cells (nf and ns, qf and qs) can be distinguished after their first divisions. Furthermore, two distinct subsets of definitive N and Q progeny exist within each hemisegment. Here we first show that there is fixed correspondence between the class of blast cell and the subset of final progeny: ns cells contribute mainly anterior ganglionic neurons and epidermal cells; nf cells contribute mainly posterior ganglionic neurons, peripheral neurons and neuropil glia; qs cells contribute both ventral and dorsal progeny; and qf cells contribute only dorsal progeny. Second, ablation studies indicate that the two classes of n blast cells do not behave as an equivalence group in the germinal band. Finally, we show that the cycles giving rise to nf and ns blast cells differ. These data suggest that cellular interactions within the germinal band may not be critical in establishing the distinct nf and ns cell fates and that, conversely, differences between the two classes of n blast cells may be established at birth.     

Pattern formation in embryos of the oligochaete annelid Tubifex: cellular basis for segmentation and specification of segmental identity

The embryonic origin of metameric segmentation was examined in the oligochaete Tubifex using lineage tracers. Segments in Tubifex embryos arise from five bilateral pairs of longitudinal coherent columns (bandlets) of primary blast cells which are generated by five bilateral pairs of embryonic stem cells called teloblasts (M, N, O, P and Q). As development proceeds, an initially linear array of blast cells in each ectodermal bandlet gradually changes its shape in a lineage-specific manner. These morphogenetic changes result in the formation of distinct cell clumps, which are separated from the bandlet to serve as segmental elements (SEs). SEs in the N and Q lineages are each comprised of clones of two consecutive primary blast cells. In contrast, in the O and P lineages, individual blast cell clones are distributed across SE boundaries; each SE is a mixture of a part of the preceding anterior clone and a part of the next posterior clone. Morphogenetic events, including segmentation, in an ectodermal bandlet proceed normally in the absence of neighboring ectodermal bandlets. Without the underlying mesoderm, separated SEs fail to space themselves at regular intervals along the anteroposterior axis. It is suggested that ectodermal segmentation in Tubifex consists of two stages; autonomous morphogenesis of each bandlet leading to generation of SEs, and the ensuing mesoderm-dependent alignment of separated SEs. In contrast, metameric segmentation in the mesoderm (M lineage) is a one-step process in that it arises from an initially simple organization (i.e. a linear series) of primary m-blast cells, which individually serve as a founder cell of each segment. The boundary between mesodermal segments is determined autonomously. The results of a set of cell ablation and transplantation experiments, using alkaline phosphatase activity as a biochemical marker for segments VII and VIII suggest that segmental identities in primary m-blast cells are determined according to the genealogical position in the M lineage and that the M teloblast possesses a developmental program through which the sequence of blast cell identities is determined.     

Differentiation of the O and P cell lines in the embryo of the leech. II. Genealogical relationship of descendant pattern elements in alternative developmental pathways

The p blast cells are a group of embryonic precursors found in the ectodermal cell layer of the leech germinal band. Each p blast cell normally undergoes the same invariant sequence of cell divisions and gives rise to a precisely defined set of uniquely identifiable neuronal and epidermal descendants in the mature leech. In the present paper, various of the p blast cell progeny were injected with a fluorescent lineage tracer in order to characterize the cellular composition of their descendant clones, and the results show that there is a stereotyped segregation of descendant cell fates through the first three p blast cell divisions. Previous work has shown that neurons and epidermal specializations which normally descend from the p blast cell will arise from a different precursor--the o blast cell--in response to ablation of the neighboring P cell line and that if the o blast cell is at a certain stage of differentiation when the ablation is performed it will produce only a subset of the normal P descendants. Comparison with the present findings indicates that under those conditions the o blast cell clone is not simply recapitulating a branch of the normal p blast cell lineage, but rather manifests an alternative lineage in which P descendants exhibit an abnormal genealogical relationship. Thus, even though normal leech development comprises a nearly invariant cell lineage, lineage relationships are open to considerable reorganization under experimental conditions.     

Cell lineage,cell-cell interaction,and segment formation in the ectoderm of a glossiphoniid leech embryo

Cell division patterns and cell-cell interactions in the germinal bands of the glossiphoniid leech Helobdella triserialis were studied with the aid of a cell lineage tracer dye. Each germinal band of the Helobdella embryo consists of five columns, or bandlets, of primary blast cells, designated as the mesodermal m bandlet and ectodermal n, o, p, and q bandlets. Primary blast cells of each ectodermal bandlet appear to undergo stereotyped, lineage-specific cell divisions. The metameric segmentation pattern of the leech thus appears to arise through a series of segmentally iterated, stereotyped cell divisions of serially homologous primary blast cell clones. Cell-cell interactions were studied by means of cell ablations. With one exception, blast cells underwent their stereotyped divisions without regard to the presence or absence of their normal neighbors. In the one exceptional case, o blast cells underwent divisions normally characteristic of p blast cells when their normal neighboring p bandlet was deleted. However, both o and p blast cells underwent their normal stereotyped divisions when their neighboring m, n, and q bandlets were deleted. It is proposed that the differential choice of pathway by the o and p blast cells depends upon their relative position with respect to each other and to a polarity cue external to the germinal band.     

Gangliogenesis in leech: morphogenetic processes leading to segmentation in the central nervous system

 Using intracellular lineage tracers to study the main neurogenic lineage (N lineage) of the glossiphoniid leech embryo, we have characterized events leading from continuous columns of segmental founder cells (nf and ns primary blast cells) to discrete, segmentally iterated ganglia. The separation between prospective ganglia was first evident as a fissure between the posterior boundary of nf- and the anterior boundary of ns-derived progeny. We also identified the sublineages of nf-derived cells that contribute parallel stripes of cells to each segment. These stripes of cells project ventrolaterally from the dorsolateral margin of each nascent ganglion to the ventral body wall. The position and orientation of the stripes suggests that they play a role in forming the posterior segmental nerve; they are not coincident with the ganglionic boundary, and they form well after the separation of ganglionic primordia. Previous work has shown that cells in the anterior stripe express the leech engrailed-class gene. Thus, in contrast to the role of cells expressing engrailed in Drosophila, the stripes of N-derived cells expressing an engrailed-class gene in leech do not seem to play a direct role in segmentation or segment polarity. Received: 10 October 1997 / Accepted: 12 December 1997     

A provisional epithelium in leech embryo: Cellular origins and influence on a developmental equivalence group

Segmental tissues of glossiphoniid leeches arise from rostrocaudally arrayed columns (bandlets) of segmental founder cells (primary m, n, o, p, and q blast cells) which undergo stereotyped sublineages to generate identifiable subsets of definitive progeny. The bandlets lie at the surface of the embryo beneath the squamous epithelium of a transient embryonic covering called the provisional integument. This "provisional epithelium" derives from microsomes produced during the early cleavage divisions. Previous experiments have shown that the primary o and p blast cells constitute an equivalence group, i.e., are initially developmentally equipotent and undergo hierarchical interactions which cause them to assume distinct O and P fates. Here, we examine the role of the provisional epithelium in determining the fates of the underlying o and p blast cells. Experiments entailing the microinjection of individual micromeres with cell lineage tracers show that, at stages 7-8 of normal development, the epithelium comprises coherent and relatively stereotyped domains derived from particular micromeres. Upon photoablating domains of epithelium labeled with photosensitizing lineage tracer, the normal assignment of O fates is disturbed; o blast cells divide symmetrically (as p blast cells do) and some supernumerary definitive progeny expressing P fates arise within the O lineage. We therefore conclude that the epithelium is essential for generation and/or reception of signal(s) by which the o and p blast cells' normally determine their fates. Finally, a new tracer substance, biotinylated fixable dextran (BFD), is described which was essential for this study by virtue of its superior resistance to photobleaching and which offers several other advantages as well.     

Analyses of segment-specific expression of alkaline phosphatase activity in the mesoderm of the oligochaete annelid Tubifex: implications for specification of segmental identity

In the embryos of the oligochaete annelid Tubifex, segments VII and VIII specifically express mesodermal alkaline phophatase (ALP) activity in the ventrolateral region. In this study, we examined whether this segment-specific expression of ALP activity depends on external cues. Cell lineage analyses show that the ALP-expressing cells originate from M teloblasts. Furthermore, a set of teloblast-ablation experiments demonstrated that the seventh and eighth primary m blast cells (m7 and m8) produced from M teloblasts give rise to ALP-expressing cells in segments VII and VIII, respectively, and that primary m blast cells other than m7 and m8 lack the ability to generate ALP-expressing progeny cells. The results of another set of blastomere-ablation experiments suggest that ALP-expressing cells emerge independently of interactions with surrounding tissues. Teloblast-transplantation experiments demonstrated that m8 can generate ALP-expressing cells in an ectopical position, suggesting that it is unlikely that ALP activity emerges in response to the positional cues residing in the embryo. These results suggest that m7 and m8 are exclusively specified as precursors of ALP-expressing cells at the time of their birth from M teloblasts. We propose that segmental identities in primary m blast cells of the Tubifex embryo are determined according to the genealogical position in the M lineage and that the M teloblast possesses a developmental program through which the sequence of blast cell identities is determined.     

Localization of polyadenylated RNAs during teloplasm formation and cleavage in leech embryos

In the embryos of glossiphoniid leeches, as in many annelids, cytoplasmic reorganization prior to first cleavage generates domains of yolk-deficient cytoplasm (called teloplasm) that are sequestered during the first three cell divisions to the D' macromere. Subsequently, the D' macromere generates a set of embryonic stem cells (teloblasts) that are the progenitors of the definitive segmental tissues. The hypothesis that fate-determining substances are localized within the teloplasm and segregated to the D macromere during cleavage is supported by experiments in which a redistribution of yolk-defcient cytoplasm changes the fate of blastomeres that inherit it (Astrow et al. 1987; Devries 1973; Nelson and Weisblat 1992). As a step toward identifying fate-determining factors in teloplasm, we describe the distribution of polyadenylated RNAs (polyA+ RNA) in the early embryo of the leech, Helobdella triserialis, as inferred from in situ hybridization using tritiated polyuridylic acid (3H-polyU). Our results indicate that polyA+ RNA colocalizes with teloplasm during cytoplasmic rearrangements resulting in teloplasm formation, and that it remains concentrated in the teloplasm during the cell divisions and a second cytoplasmic rearrangement during early embryogenesis. Lesser amounts of polyA+ RNA appear to be localized in cortical cytoplasm at most stages.     

Age-dependent changes in myogenic precursor cell compartment sizes. Evidence for the existence of a stem cell

Individual myogenic cells were isolated from the pectoralis muscles of chick embryos from days 8-14 of embryogenesis. When separately cloned, these cells produced three types of colonies in culture: (1) Positive: all cells in the clone were terminally differentiated muscle cells; (2) negative: no cells in the clone were terminally differentiated muscle; (3) mixed: some cells in the clone were terminally differentiated muscle. Positive clones from all ages tended to contain 2n cells (n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4). Negative clones were found in all sizes and did not cluster around powers of 2 in cell number. Mixed clones were, by far, the most common type among those clones larger than 24 in cell number. Estimates of cell numbers in embryonic muscle tissue revealed that, while the numbers of cells in all myogenic compartments increased steadily with embryonic age, the number and percentage of precursor cells that produced large mixed clones increased dramatically. Subclones, prepared from populations of cells equivalent to large mixed clones, yielded both small positive and large mixed colonies. This indicated that the precursors to the large mixed clones were also precursors to the smaller positive clones. These observations suggest a model for the myogenic lineage in which there exists a stem cell that can generate, by a series of asymmetric divisions, cohorts of terminally differentiated muscle cells. The model can explain the asynchrony of production of terminally differentiated muscle cells both in vitro and in vivo.     

A clonal analysis of spinal cord development in the zebrafish

 We describe the results of a clonal analysis of spinal cord development in the zebrafish. The data were obtained from embryos in which fluorescent lineage tracer was injected into single cells in the neural plate at the two-somite stage. Injected animals were allowed to survive until either 4 days or 2 weeks postfertilization. In other experiments, bromodeoxy uridine (BrdU) was injected intraperitoneally at 30 h postfertilization (hpf) after lineage tracer injection in the neural plate at the two-somite stage, and the embryos fixed at 38 hpf. We restricted our experiments to the thoracic region of the spinal cord. Our experiments were aimed at answering questions regarding the proliferative abilities of neuroepithelial cells during embryonic development (as deduced from the size of the clones), the modes of cell division (as deduced from the uptake of BrdU into clone cells), positional differences in the proliferation of cells within the neural plate itself, the cellular composition of the clones, and cell dispersion (deduced from the regional distribution of clone cells). Received: 30 December 1994 / Accepted: 9 March 1997     

Two types of asymmetric divisions in the Drosophila sensory organ precursor cell lineage

Asymmetric partitioning of cell-fate determinants during development requires coordinating the positioning of these determinants with orientation of the mitotic spindle. In the Drosophila peripheral nervous system, sensory organ progenitor cells (SOPs) undergo several rounds of division to produce five cells that give rise to a complete sensory organ. Here we have observed the asymmetric divisions that give rise to these cells in the developing pupae using green fluorescent protein fusion proteins. We find that spindle orientation and determinant localization are tightly coordinated at each division. Furthermore, we find that two types of asymmetric divisions exist within the sensory organ precursor cell lineage: the anterior-posterior pI cell-type division, where the spindle remains symmetric throughout mitosis, and the strikingly neuroblast-like apical-basal division of the pIIb cell, where the spindle exhibits a strong asymmetry at anaphase. In both these divisions, the spindle reorientates to position itself perpendicular to the region of the cortex containing the determinant. On the basis of these observations, we propose that two distinct mechanisms for controlling asymmetric cell divisions occur within the same lineage in the developing peripheral nervous system in Drosophila.