Binding kinetics and activity of human poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase‐1 on oligo‐deoxyribonucleotide substrates

Poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase‐1 (PARP‐1) is a mammalian enzyme that attaches long branching chains of ADP‐ribose to specific nuclear proteins, including itself. Because its activity in vitro is dependent upon interaction with broken DNA, it has been postulated that PARP‐1 plays an important role in DNA strand‐break repair in vivo. The exact mechanism of binding to DNA and the structural determinants of binding remain to be defined, but regions of transition from single‐stranded to double‐strandedness may be important recognition sites. Here we employ surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to investigate this hypothesis. Oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) substrates that mimic DNA with different degrees of single‐strandedness were used for measurements of both PARP‐1/DNA binding kinetics and PARP‐1's enzyme activities. We found that binding correlated with activity, but was unrelated to single‐strandedness of the ODN. Instead, PARP‐1 binding and activity were highest on ODNs that modeled a DNA double‐strand break (DSB). These results provide support for PARP‐1 recognizing and binding DSBs in a manner that is independent of single‐stranded features, and demonstrate the usefulness of SPR for simultaneously investigating both PARP‐1 binding and PARP‐1 auto‐poly(ADP‐ribosyl)ation activities within the same in vitro system. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

ATM and Artemis promote homologous recombination of radiation‐induced DNA double‐strand breaks in G2

Homologous recombination (HR) and non‐homologous end joining (NHEJ) represent distinct pathways for repairing DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs). Previous work implicated Artemis and ATM in an NHEJ‐dependent process, which repairs a defined subset of radiation‐induced DSBs in G1‐phase. Here, we show that in G2, as in G1, NHEJ represents the major DSB‐repair pathway whereas HR is only essential for repair of ～15% of X‐ or γ‐ray‐induced DSBs. In addition to requiring the known HR proteins, Brca2, Rad51 and Rad54, repair of radiation‐induced DSBs by HR in G2 also involves Artemis and ATM suggesting that they promote NHEJ during G1 but HR during G2. The dependency for ATM for repair is relieved by depleting KAP‐1, providing evidence that HR in G2 repairs heterochromatin‐associated DSBs. Although not core HR proteins, ATM and Artemis are required for efficient formation of single‐stranded DNA and Rad51 foci at radiation‐induced DSBs in G2 with Artemis function requiring its endonuclease activity. We suggest that Artemis endonuclease removes lesions or secondary structures, which inhibit end resection and preclude the completion of HR or NHEJ.     

The function of classical and alternative non‐homologous end‐joining pathways in the fusion of dysfunctional telomeres

Repair of DNA double‐stranded breaks (DSBs) is crucial for the maintenance of genome stability. DSBs are repaired by either error prone non‐homologous end‐joining (NHEJ) or error‐free homologous recombination. NHEJ precedes either by a classic, Lig4‐dependent process (C‐NHEJ) or an alternative, Lig4‐independent one (A‐NHEJ). Dysfunctional telomeres arising either through natural attrition due to telomerase deficiency or by removal of telomere‐binding proteins are recognized as DSBs. In this report, we studied which end‐joining pathways are required to join dysfunctional telomeres. In agreement with earlier studies, depletion of Trf2 resulted in end‐to‐end chromosome fusions mediated by the C‐NHEJ pathway. In contrast, removal of Tpp1–Pot1a/b initiated robust chromosome fusions that are mediated by A‐NHEJ. C‐NHEJ is also dispensable for the fusion of naturally shortened telomeres. Our results reveal that telomeres engage distinct DNA repair pathways depending on how they are rendered dysfunctional, and that A‐NHEJ is a major pathway to process dysfunctional telomeres.     

Structure of the Rad50 DNA double‐strand break repair protein in complex with DNA

The Mre11–Rad50 nuclease–ATPase is an evolutionarily conserved multifunctional DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair factor. Mre11–Rad50's mechanism in the processing, tethering, and signaling of DSBs is unclear, in part because we lack a structural framework for its interaction with DNA in different functional states. We determined the crystal structure of Thermotoga maritima Rad50^NBD (nucleotide‐binding domain) in complex with Mre11^HLH (helix‐loop‐helix domain), AMPPNP, and double‐stranded DNA. DNA binds between both coiled‐coil domains of the Rad50 dimer with main interactions to a strand‐loop‐helix motif on the NBD. Our analysis suggests that this motif on Rad50 does not directly recognize DNA ends and binds internal sites on DNA. Functional studies reveal that DNA binding to Rad50 is not critical for DNA double‐strand break repair but is important for telomere maintenance. In summary, we provide a structural framework for DNA binding to Rad50 in the ATP‐bound state.     

The semi-quantitative comparison of oxidative stress mediated DNA single and double strand breaks using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated end labeling combined with a slot blot technique

The accumulation of DNA damages by environmental stresses is represented by the steady state level of single strand breaks (SSBs) and double strand breaks (DSBs). Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) mediated end labeling is suitable in detecting DSBs, but is unsuitable for SSBs due to its catalyzing characteristics. However, the sensitivity of TdT to detect SSBs may be significantly improved by first denaturing the double strands and expose all the DNA nicks as potential substrates for TdT. By coupling DNA denaturation to slot blot southern hybridization, the authors demonstrate the sensitive detection of SSBs as well as DSBs in 20 ng DNA samples derived from a retinal pigment epithelial cell line treated with tert-butyl hydroperoxide. The signal intensity of denatured and TdT-treated DNA in slot blot hybridization correlated to the amount of SSBs calculated in an S1 nuclease digestion assay. The signal ratio between denatured and non-denatured DNA likely approximates the SSBs/DSBs ratio in genomic DNA. The combination of DNA denaturing, TdT treatment and slot blot hybridization could be a useful method to assess oxidative stress-induced DNA strand damages.     

The mechanism of Single strand binding protein–RecG binding: Implications for SSB interactome function

The Escherichia coli single‐strand DNA binding protein (SSB) is essential to viability where it functions to regulate SSB interactome function. Here it binds to single‐stranded DNA and to target proteins that comprise the interactome. The region of SSB that links these two essential protein functions is the intrinsically disordered linker. Key to linker function is the presence of three, conserved PXXP motifs that mediate binding to oligosaccharide‐oligonucleotide binding folds (OB‐fold) present in SSB and its interactome partners. Not surprisingly, partner OB‐fold deletions eliminate SSB binding. Furthermore, single point mutations in either the PXXP motifs or, in the RecG OB‐fold, obliterate SSB binding. The data also demonstrate that, and in contrast to the view currently held in the field, the C‐terminal acidic tip of SSB is not required for interactome partner binding. Instead, we propose the tip has two roles. First, and consistent with the proposal of Dixon, to regulate the structure of the C‐terminal domain in a biologically active conformation that prevents linkers from binding to SSB OB‐folds until this interaction is required. Second, as a secondary binding domain. Finally, as OB‐folds are present in SSB and many of its partners, we present the SSB interactome as the first family of OB‐fold genome guardians identified in prokaryotes.     

Mec1/ATR regulates the generation of single‐stranded DNA that attenuates Tel1/ATM signaling at DNA ends

Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinases are activated by DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs). Mec1/ATR recruitment to DSBs requires the formation of RPA‐coated single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA), which arises from 5′–3′ nucleolytic degradation (resection) of DNA ends. Here, we show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1 regulates resection of the DSB ends. The lack of Mec1 accelerates resection and reduces the loading to DSBs of the checkpoint protein Rad9, which is known to inhibit ssDNA generation. Extensive resection is instead inhibited by the Mec1‐ad mutant variant that increases the recruitment near the DSB of Rad9, which in turn blocks DSB resection by both Rad53‐dependent and Rad53‐independent mechanisms. The mec1‐ad resection defect leads to prolonged persistence at DSBs of the MRX complex that causes unscheduled Tel1 activation, which in turn impairs checkpoint switch off. Thus, Mec1 regulates the generation of ssDNA at DSBs, and this control is important to coordinate Mec1 and Tel1 signaling activities at these breaks.     

Age and gender effects on DNA strand break repair in peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Exogenous and endogenous damage to DNA is constantly challenging the stability of our genome. This DNA damage increase the frequency of errors in DNA replication, thus causing point mutations or chromosomal rearrangements and has been implicated in aging, cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, efficient DNA repair is vital for the maintenance of genome stability. The general notion has been that DNA repair capacity decreases with age although there are conflicting results. Here, we focused on potential age‐associated changes in DNA damage response and the capacities of repairing DNA single‐strand breaks (SSBs) and double‐strand breaks (DSBs) in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Of these lesions, DSBs are the least frequent but the most dangerous for cells. We have measured the level of endogenous SSBs, SSB repair capacity, γ‐H2AX response, and DSB repair capacity in a study population consisting of 216 individuals from a population‐based sample of twins aged 40–77 years. Age in this range did not seem to have any effect on the SSB parameters. However, γ‐H2AX response and DSB repair capacity decreased with increasing age, although the associations did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for batch effect across multiple experiments. No gender differences were observed for any of the parameters analyzed. Our findings suggest that in PBMCs, the repair of SSBs is maintained until old age, whereas the response to and the repair of DSBs decrease.     

Nucleotides sequestered at different subsite loci within DNA‐binding pockets of two OB‐fold single‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins are unstacked to different extents

The gene 5 protein (g5p) encoded by the Ff strains of Escherichia coli bacteriophages is a dimeric single‐stranded DNA‐binding protein (SSB) that consists of two identical OB‐fold (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide‐binding) motifs. Ultrafast time‐resolved fluorescence measurements were carried out to investigate the effect of g5p binding on the conformation of 2‐aminopurine (2AP) labels positioned between adenines or cytosines in the 16‐nucleotide antiparallel tails of DNA hairpins. The measurements revealed significant changes in the conformational heterogeneity of the 2AP labels caused by g5p binding. The extent of the changes was dependent on sub‐binding‐site location, but generally resulted in base unstacking. When bound by g5p, the unstacked 2AP population increased from ～22% to 59–67% in C‐2AP‐C segments and from 39% to 77% in an A‐2AP‐A segment. The OB‐fold RPA70A domain of the human replication protein A also caused a significant amount of base unstacking at various locations within the DNA binding site as evidenced by steady‐state fluorescence titration measurements using 2AP‐labeled 5‐mer DNAs. These solution studies support the concept that base unstacking at most of a protein's multiple sub‐binding‐site loci may be a feature that allows non‐sequence specific OB‐fold proteins to bind to single‐stranded DNAs (ssDNAs) with minimal preference for particular sequences. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 99: 484–496, 2013.     

Proteomic Analysis of DNA Synthesis on a Structured DNA Template in Human Cellular Extracts: Interplay Between NHEJ and Replication‐Associated Proteins

It is established that short inverted repeats trigger base substitution mutagenesis in human cells. However, how the replication machinery deals with structured DNA is unknown. It has been previously reported that in human cell‐free extracts, DNA primer extension using a structured single‐stranded template is transiently blocked at DNA hairpins. Here, the proteomic analysis of proteins bound to the DNA template is reported and evidence that the DNA‐PK complex (DNA‐PKcs and the Ku heterodimer) recognizes, and is activated by, structured single‐stranded DNA is provided. Hijacking the DNA‐PK complex by double‐stranded oligonucleotides results in a large removal of the pausing sites and an elevated DNA extension efficiency. Conversely, DNA‐PKcs inhibition results in its stabilization on the template, along with other proteins acting downstream in the Non‐Homologous End‐Joining (NHEJ) pathway, especially the XRCC4‐DNA ligase 4 complex and the cofactor PAXX. Retention of NHEJ factors to the DNA in the absence of DNA‐PKcs activity correlates with additional halts of primer extension, suggesting that these proteins hinder the progression of the DNA synthesis at these sites. Overall these results raise the possibility that, upon binding to hairpins formed onto ssDNA during fork progression, the DNA‐PK complex interferes with replication fork dynamics in vivo.     

A RAD52‐like single‐stranded DNA binding protein affects mitochondrial DNA repair by recombination

The plant mitochondrial DNA‐binding protein ODB1 was identified from a mitochondrial extract after DNA‐affinity purification. ODB1 (organellar DNA‐binding protein 1) co‐purified with WHY2, a mitochondrial member of the WHIRLY family of plant‐specific proteins involved in the repair of organellar DNA. The Arabidopsis thaliana ODB1 gene is identical to RAD52‐1, which encodes a protein functioning in homologous recombination in the nucleus but additionally localizing to mitochondria. We confirmed the mitochondrial localization of ODB1 by in vitro and in vivo import assays, as well as by immunodetection on Arabidopsis subcellular fractions. In mitochondria, WHY2 and ODB1 were found in large nucleo‐protein complexes. Both proteins co‐immunoprecipitated in a DNA‐dependent manner. In vitro assays confirmed DNA binding by ODB1 and showed that the protein has higher affinity for single‐stranded than for double‐stranded DNA. ODB1 showed no sequence specificity in vitro. In vivo, DNA co‐immunoprecipitation indicated that ODB1 binds sequences throughout the mitochondrial genome. ODB1 promoted annealing of complementary DNA sequences, suggesting a RAD52‐like function as a recombination mediator. Arabidopsis odb1 mutants were morphologically indistinguishable from the wild‐type, but following DNA damage by genotoxic stress, they showed reduced mitochondrial homologous recombination activity. Under the same conditions, the odb1 mutants showed an increase in illegitimate repair bypasses generated by microhomology‐mediated recombination. These observations identify ODB1 as a further component of homologous recombination‐dependent DNA repair in plant mitochondria.     

Two distinct conformational states define the interaction of human RAD51‐ATP with single‐stranded DNA

An essential mechanism for repairing DNA double‐strand breaks is homologous recombination (HR). One of its core catalysts is human RAD51 (hRAD51), which assembles as a helical nucleoprotein filament on single‐stranded DNA, promoting DNA‐strand exchange. Here, we study the interaction of hRAD51 with single‐stranded DNA using a single‐molecule approach. We show that ATP‐bound hRAD51 filaments can exist in two different states with different contour lengths and with a free‐energy difference of ~4 k_BT per hRAD51 monomer. Upon ATP hydrolysis, the filaments convert into a disassembly‐competent ADP‐bound configuration. In agreement with the single‐molecule analysis, we demonstrate the presence of two distinct protomer interfaces in the crystal structure of a hRAD51‐ATP filament, providing a structural basis for the two conformational states of the filament. Together, our findings provide evidence that hRAD51‐ATP filaments can exist in two interconvertible conformational states, which might be functionally relevant for DNA homology recognition and strand exchange.     

Distinct roles of ATR and DNA‐PKcs in triggering DNA damage responses in ATM‐deficient cells

The cellular response to DNA double‐strand breaks involves direct activation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and indirect activation of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) in an ATM/Mre11/cell‐cycle‐dependent manner. Here, we report that the crucial checkpoint signalling proteins—p53, structural maintainance of chromosomes 1 (SMC1), p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1), checkpoint kinase (Chk)1 and Chk2—are phosphorylated rapidly by ATR in an ATM/Mre11/cell‐cycle‐independent manner, albeit at low levels. We observed the sequential recruitment of replication protein A (RPA) and ATR to the sites of DNA damage in ATM‐deficient cells, which provides a mechanistic basis for the observed phosphorylations. The recruitment of ATR and consequent phosphorylations do not require Mre11 but are dependent on Exo1. We show that these low levels of phosphorylation are biologically important, as ATM‐deficient cells enforce an early G2/M checkpoint that is ATR‐dependent. ATR is also essential for the late G2 accumulation that is peculiar to irradiated ATM‐deficient cells. Interestingly, phosphorylation of KRAB associated protein 1 (KAP‐1), a protein involved in chromatin remodelling, is mediated by DNA‐dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA‐PKcs) in a spatio‐temporal manner in addition to ATM. We posit that ATM substrates involved in cell‐cycle checkpoint signalling can be minimally phosphorylated independently by ATR, while a small subset of proteins involved in chromatin remodelling are phosphorylated by DNA‐PKcs in addition to ATM.     

Conformational changes in DNA‐binding proteins: Relationships with precomplex features and contributions to specificity and stability

Both Proteins and DNA undergo conformational changes in order to form functional complexes and also to facilitate interactions with other molecules. These changes have direct implications for the stability and specificity of the complex, as well as the cooperativity of interactions between multiple entities. In this work, we have extensively analyzed conformational changes in DNA‐binding proteins by superimposing DNA‐bound and unbound pairs of protein structures in a curated database of 90 proteins. We manually examined each of these pairs, unified the authors' annotations, and summarized our observations by classifying conformational changes into six structural categories. We explored a relationship between conformational changes and functional classes, binding motifs, target specificity, biophysical features of unbound proteins, and stability of the complex. In addition, we have also investigated the degree to which the intrinsic flexibility can explain conformational changes in a subset of 52 proteins with high quality coordinate data. Our results indicate that conformational changes in DNA‐binding proteins contribute significantly to both the stability of the complex and the specificity of targets recognized by them. We also conclude that most conformational changes occur in proteins interacting with specific DNA targets, even though unbound protein structures may have sufficient information to interact with DNA in a nonspecific manner. Proteins 2014; 82:841–857. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A novel single‐cell method provides direct evidence of persistent DNA damage in senescent cells and aged mammalian tissues

The DNA damage response (DDR) arrests cell cycle progression until DNA lesions, like DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs), are repaired. The presence of DSBs in cells is usually detected by indirect techniques that rely on the accumulation of proteins at DSBs, as part of the DDR. Such detection may be biased, as some factors and their modifications may not reflect physical DNA damage. The dependency on DDR markers of DSB detection tools has left questions unanswered. In particular, it is known that senescent cells display persistent DDR foci, that we and others have proposed to be persistent DSBs, resistant to endogenous DNA repair activities. Others have proposed that these peculiar DDR foci might not be sites of damaged DNA per se but instead stable chromatin modifications, termed DNA‐SCARS. Here, we developed a method, named ‘DNA damage in situ ligation followed by proximity ligation assay’ (DI‐PLA) for the detection and imaging of DSBs in cells. DI‐PLA is based on the capture of free DNA ends in fixed cells in situ, by ligation to biotinylated double‐stranded DNA oligonucleotides, which are next recognized by antibiotin anti‐bodies. Detection is enhanced by PLA with a partner DDR marker at the DSB. We validated DI‐PLA by demonstrating its ability to detect DSBs induced by various genotoxic insults in cultured cells and tissues. Most importantly, by DI‐PLA, we demonstrated that both senescent cells in culture and tissues from aged mammals retain true unrepaired DSBs associated with DDR markers.     

Sua5p a single‐stranded telomeric DNA‐binding protein facilitates telomere replication

In budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, telomere length maintenance involves a complicated network as more than 280 telomere maintenance genes have been identified in the nonessential gene deletion mutant set. As a supplement, we identified additional 29 telomere maintenance genes, which were previously taken as essential genes. In this study, we report a novel function of Sua5p in telomere replication. Epistasis analysis and telomere sequencing show that sua5Δ cells display progressively shortened telomeres at early passages, and Sua5 functions downstream telomerase recruitment. Further, biochemical, structural and genetic studies show that Sua5p specifically binds single‐stranded telomeric (ssTG) DNA in vitro through a distinct DNA‐binding region on its surface, and the DNA‐binding ability is essential for its telomere function. Thus, Sua5p represents a novel ssTG DNA‐binding protein and positively regulates the telomere length in vivo.     

Taxonomic distribution,repeats, and functions of the S1 domain‐containing proteins as members of the OB‐fold family

Proteins of the nucleic acid‐binding proteins superfamily perform such functions as processing, transport, storage, stretching, translation, and degradation of RNA. It is one of the 16 superfamilies containing the OB‐fold in protein structures. Here, we have analyzed the superfamily of nucleic acid‐binding proteins (the number of sequences exceeds 200,000) and obtained that this superfamily prevalently consists of proteins containing the cold shock DNA‐binding domain (ca. 131,000 protein sequences). Proteins containing the S1 domain compose 57% from the cold shock DNA‐binding domain family. Furthermore, we have found that the S1 domain was identified mainly in the bacterial proteins (ca. 83%) compared to the eukaryotic and archaeal proteins, which are available in the UniProt database. We have found that the number of multiple repeats of S1 domain in the S1 domain‐containing proteins depends on the taxonomic affiliation. All archaeal proteins contain one copy of the S1 domain, while the number of repeats in the eukaryotic proteins varies between 1 and 15 and correlates with the protein size. In the bacterial proteins, the number of repeats is no more than 6, regardless of the protein size. The large variation of the repeat number of S1 domain as one of the structural variants of the OB‐fold is a distinctive feature of S1 domain‐containing proteins. Proteins from the other families and superfamilies have either one OB‐fold or change slightly the repeat numbers. On the whole, it can be supposed that the repeat number is a vital for multifunctional activity of the S1 domain‐containing proteins. Proteins 2017; 85:602–613. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBs) from prokaryotic transmissible plasmids

The DNA and protein sequences of single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBs) encoded by the plP71a, plP231a, and R64 conjugative plasmids have been determined and compared to Escherichia coli SSB and the SSB encoded by F-plasmid. Although the amino acid sequences of all of these proteins are highly conserved within the NH2-terminal two-thirds of the protein, they diverge in the COOH-terminal third region. A number of amino acid residues which have previously been implicated as being either directly or indirectly involved in DNA binding are conserved in all of these SSBs. These residues include Trp-40, Trp-54, Trp-88, His-55, and Phe-60. On the basis of these sequence comparisons and DNA binding studies, a role for Tyr-70 in DNA binding is suggested for the first time. Although the COOH-terminal third of these proteins diverges more than their NH2-terminal regions, the COOH-terminal five amino acid residues of all five of these proteins are identical. In addition, all of these proteins share the characteristic property of having a protease resistant, NH2-terminal core and an acidic COOH-terminal region. Despite the high degree of sequence homology among the plasmid SSB proteins, the F-plasmid SSB appears unique in that it was the only SSB tested that neither bound well to poly(dA) nor was able to stimulate DNA polymerase III holoenzyme elongation rates. Poly [d(A-T)] melting studies suggest that at least three of the plasmid encoded SSBs are better helix-destabilizing proteins than is the E. coli SSB protein.