Interval between insulin injection and eating in relation to blood glucose control in adult diabetics.

In a survey of 225 diabetics treated with insulin 24 (10.6%) claimed never to have received advice concerning the interval between insulin injection and eating. Of the remainder, 67 (33%) admitted disregarding advice and using shorter intervals. There was a significant (p less than 0.01) difference between the reported frequencies of clinical hypoglycaemia in patients using different intervals. The effects on glucose control of intervals between insulin injection and breakfast of zero, 15, 30, and 45 minutes were studied for periods of one week in 11 patients with type I diabetes who were receiving twice daily injections of monocomponent porcine insulins and high fibre, high carbohydrate diets, using standard home blood glucose monitoring techniques to measure blood glucose concentrations each morning. The delay of 45 minutes resulted in the lowest frequency of hypoglycaemia and the most acceptable pattern of glucose concentrations measured one and two hours after breakfast and before lunch. Combining results obtained at these three times, the mean increment in blood glucose concentration was smaller after allowing a delay of 45 minutes than after delays of zero (p less than 0.001), 15 (p less than 0.03), and 30 (NS) minutes. A delay of 30 minutes resulted in smaller mean increments in blood glucose concentration than did delays of zero (p less than 0.001) and 15 (NS) minutes. These results suggest that this aspect of diabetic management may be neglected, with important consequences for blood glucose control. An increase in delay between insulin injection and eating to 45 minutes would be a simple and safe way of improving blood glucose control in at least the 37% of the diabetic population surveyed in this study who currently allow less than 15 minutes.     

Human insulin and porcine insulin in the treatment of diabetic children: comparison of metabolic control and insulin antibody production.

Semisynthetic human insulin and highly purified porcine insulin were compared in a double blind crossover study in 21 diabetic children. Glycosylated haemoglobin values at the end of four month treatment periods were higher after treatment with human insulin than after treatment with porcine insulin (mean 15.7% (SD 2.3%) v 14.2% (2.3%); p less than 0.01). Higher fasting blood glucose concentrations occurred during treatment with human insulin than with porcine insulin (mean 12.0 (SD 2.1) v 11.0 (2.4) mmol/1; mean 216 (SD 38) v 198 (43) mg/100 ml; p less than 0.05), but there were no significant differences at other time points during the day. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was similar for both treatment groups. Concentrations of antibody reactive with porcine and human insulins were similar for the two treatment groups, although greater fluctuation was observed in the amount of antibody reactive with human insulin. Semisynthetic human insulin is safe and effective in diabetic children, although further work is needed to devise regimens which achieve optimal blood glucose control.     

他克莫司对大鼠血糖的影响及其作用机制

目的 观察不同浓度的他克莫司对大鼠血糖的影响.方法 选取雄性SD大鼠30只,体重70～85g,随机等分为三组.A组大鼠为他克莫司加五脂胶囊组,每日给予他克莫司(普乐可复Astellas Ireland Co.,Ltd生产)2 mg/kg和五酯软胶囊(四川光大制药有限公司生产)0.2粒/kg;B组为他克莫司组,每日给予他克莫司2 mg/kg;C组为对照组,每日给予同等量生理盐水,三组大鼠均在空腹时灌胃给药,用药1h后喂食.用药时间为5个月.每月监测大鼠他克莫司血药浓度和空腹血糖.结果 在用药的1～5个月期间,A组大鼠他克莫司血药浓度均明显高于B组.在用药的第1个月和第2个月,三组大鼠空腹血糖无明显差异(P＞0.05),用药第3个月后,A、B两组大鼠血糖均明显高于对照组(P＜0.01),A组大鼠血糖略高于B组,二者之间差异并无统计学意义(P＞0.05);用药第4、5个月后A、B两组大鼠的血糖持续升高,并且A组大鼠血糖明显高于B组(P＜0.01);A组的胰岛素分泌指数和敏感指数均明显低于C组(P＜0.01).结论 他克莫司通过减少胰岛素的分泌、增加胰岛素抵抗导致大鼠血糖升高,这种升血糖作用呈时间依赖性和浓度依赖性.     

Influence of human insulin on symptoms and awareness of hypoglycaemia: a randomised double blind crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE--To investigate the apparent increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia associated with use of human insulin by comparing the pattern of symptoms of hypoglycaemia with human insulin and porcine insulin. DESIGN--Randomised controlled double blind crossover trial of treatment with human insulin and porcine insulin, with two treatment periods of six weeks. SETTING--Diabetes outpatient department of a university teaching hospital in Berne, Switzerland. PATIENTS--44 patients (25 men, 19 women) aged 14 to 60 years, with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. All patients met the following criteria: receiving treatment with fast acting soluble insulin and long acting protamine insulin; performing multiple daily fingerstick blood glucose self measurements; and had stable glycaemic control with about one mild hypoglycaemic episode a week during the preceding two months. INTERVENTION--Patients were randomised to receive either human or porcine insulin for six weeks and were then changed over to the other type of insulin for a further six weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Questionnaire recording "autonomic" and "neuroglycopenic" symptoms that occurred during hypoglycaemic episodes confirmed by a blood glucose concentration less than or equal to 2.8 mmol/l. RESULTS--Insulin doses and blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin A1c, and fructosamine concentrations were similar during the two treatment periods. 493 questionnaires on hypoglycaemia (234 during treatment with human insulin and 259 during treatment with porcine insulin) were analysed. With human insulin patients were more likely to report lack of concentration (52% v 35%, p = 0.0003) and restlessness (53% v 45%, p = 0.004) and less likely to report hunger (33% v 42%, p = 0.016) than during treatment with porcine insulin. The difference in the pattern of symptoms during the two treatments was similar to that between the 12 patients with a history of recurrent hypoglycaemic coma and the 32 patients without such a history. CONCLUSIONS--The pattern of symptoms associated with human insulin could impair patients'' ability to take appropriate steps to avoid severe hypoglycaemia. Caution should be exercised when transferring patients from animal insulin to human insulin, and a large scale randomised trial of the two types of insulin may be justified.     

Transfer from porcine insulin to human insulin in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: effects on insulin binding to IgG and glycemic control

Thirty type I diabetic patients who were treated for at least 2 years with a combination of regular and lente monocomponent porcine insulins were allocated in a double-blind study to either continued porcine insulin treatment or a transfer to the corresponding semi-synthetic human insulins. Insulin binding to IgG measured by an immunoelectrophoretic method, was followed at 3-month intervals for 1 year, and did not change after the transfer. The glycemic control, as assessed by hemoglobin A1 levels, tended to deteriorate in the human insulin group during the first 3 months of the trial and then return to the baseline level. It is concluded that a transfer from highly purified porcine insulin to human insulin apparently does not change the insulin binding to IgG in already sensitized patients.     

安立泽联合胰岛素治疗单独胰岛素降糖欠佳的高龄 2 型糖尿病患者临床观察

目的：观察安立泽应用于单独胰岛素治疗血糖控制欠佳的高龄2 型糖尿病患者的疗效及安全性。方法：200 例高龄2型糖尿 病胰岛素降糖欠佳的患者（空腹血糖控制在7.8-13.9mmol/L范围内）,随机分成对照组和治疗组,对照组采用胰岛素加安慰剂治 疗80 例;治疗组120 例,分为A、B、C三组,每组40 例,A、B、C三组分别在继续应用胰岛素治疗的基础上加服安立泽4mg/d、 5mg/d、6mg/d,疗程三个月。观测治疗组和对照组治疗前后FPG 及PPG、HbA1C、BMI 和胰岛素用量的改变及治疗的安全性。结 果：对照组和治疗组治疗前的各指标无明显差异（P＞0.05）;A、B、C三组在治疗后1 个月和3 个月FPG、PPG、HbA1C均有明显的 下降（P＜0.05,P＜0.01）,而对照组治疗前后FIG、PPG、HbA1C 略有下降,差异不明显（P＞0.05）;A、B、C 三组胰岛素的用量及体 重指数较治疗前均略有下降,三组间无显著性差异;对照组和治疗组的不良反应发生率无显著差异。结论：对高龄2 型糖尿病单 用胰岛素治疗血糖控制欠佳的患者,加用安立泽治疗,可使糖尿病相关指标得以良好的控制,减少糖尿病患者每日胰岛素用量, 临床毒副作用较小。     

门冬胰岛素与人普通胰岛素及胰岛素泵在2型糖尿病患者围手术期的疗效比较

目的：探讨速效胰岛素类似物（门冬胰岛素,诺和锐）与人普通胰岛素（诺和灵R）及胰岛素泵在2型糖尿病（T2DM）围手术期治疗中的有效性和安全性。方法：158例围手术期T2DM患者随机分为胰岛素泵输注门冬胰岛素治疗CSII组52例,门冬胰岛素多次皮下注射治疗MSII（A）组56例,人普通胰岛素多次皮下注射治疗MSII（B）组50例。观察各组患者治疗前后空腹和餐后2h血糖变化、血糖迭标时间、胰岛素用量、低血糖发生率及术后并发症发生率。结果：3组治疗后血糖均明显低于抬疗前,CSII组治疗后血糖低于MSII（A）组（P〈o．05）,MSII（A）组治疗后血糖低于MSII（B）组（P〈0．05）;术后并发症CSII组低于MSII（A）组（P〈0．05）,MSII㈧组低于MSII（B）组（P〈0．05）。结论：门冬胰岛素对T2DM围手术期血糖控制有较好的有效性、安全性和顺应性,胰岛素泵是2型糖尿病患者围手术期胰岛素输注的最佳模式。     

安立泽联合胰岛素治疗单独胰岛素降糖欠佳的高龄2型糖尿病患者临床观察

目的：观察安立泽应用于单独胰岛素治疗血糖控制欠佳的高龄2型糖尿病患者的疗效及安全性。方法：200例高龄2型糖尿病胰岛素降糖欠佳的患者（空腹血糖控制在7．8．13．9mmol／L范围内）,随机分成对照组和治疗组,对照组采用胰岛素加安慰剂治疗80例;治疗组120例,分为A、B、c三组,每组40例,A、B、c三组分别在继续应用胰岛素治疗的基础上加服安立泽4mg／d、5mg／d、6mg／d,疗程三个月。观测治疗组和对照组治疗前后FPG及PPG、HbAlC、BMI和胰岛素用量的改变及治疗的安全性。结果：对照组和治疗组治疗前的各指标无明显差异（P〉0．05）;A、B、c三组在治疗后1个月和3个月FPG、PPG、H1）A1C均有明显的下降（P〈0．05,P〈0．01）,而对照组治疗前后FIG、PPG、HbAlC略有下降,差异不明显（P〉0．05）;A、B、c三组胰岛素的用量及体重指数较治疗前均略有下降,三组间无显著性差异;对照组和治疗组的不良反应发生率无显著差异。结论：对高龄2型糖尿病单用胰岛素治疗血糖控制欠佳的患者,加用安立泽治疗,可使糖尿病相关指标得以良好的控制,减少糖尿病患者每日胰岛素用量,临床毒副作用较小。     

Special management of insulin lispro in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in young diabetic children: a randomized cross-over study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, efficacy and management of insulin lispro (LP) with regular human insulin (RH) in young diabetic children treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). STUDY DESIGN: 27 very young diabetic children (age 4.6 +/- 2.2 years) treated with CSII participated in an open-label, randomized cross-over multicenter study comparing 2 periods of 16 weeks of CSII with LP or RH. RESULTS: Mean daily basal rate was significantly higher during the LP period (p = 0.04). No differences were seen in changes in HbA1c levels, number of hypoglycemic events, cutaneous infections and catheter occlusions. There was no significant difference between the two treatments for preprandial and postprandial glucose values, although prandial glucose excursions tended to be lower with LP (significant at dinner, p = 0.01). Mean blood glucose levels were significantly higher at 0.00 and 3.00 a.m. during LP therapy (p < 0.05). No episode of ketoacidosis occurred during LP treatment. More parents indicated that LP made their own and the child's daily life easier (p = 0.02) and preferred LP (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LP in CSII therapy in children is safe, as effective as RH, improved postprandial excursions, met the needs of young children in their daily life well, and gained their parents' satisfaction and preference. However, a shorter duration of LP resulted in hyperglycemia during the first part of the night, which must be compensated for by increasing nocturnal basal rates during this time.     

Clinical examination of diabetic patients treated with monocomponent insulin manufactured by MP Polfa

An effect of replacing conventional forms of insulin by the monocomponent insulin manufactured by "Polfa" was studied in the group of 22 diabetics. The patients were followed up for 12 months. An effect of monocomponent insulin on daily requirement of insulin, levels of anti-insulin, monocomponent and pancreatic peptide antibodies, compensation of diabetes mellitus, and lipodystrophy were investigated. New insulin preparation decreased anti-insulin and pancreatic peptide antibodies level and markedly diminished lipodystrophy. However, daily insulin requirement, degree of diabetes mellitus compensation, and anti-proinsulin antibodies level remained unchanged.     

Glycemic Control After Hospital Discharge in Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Pilot Study of Daily Remote Glucose Monitoring

ObjectiveLittle is known about glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin in the high-risk period between hospital discharge and follow-up. We sought to assess the impact of remote glucose monitoring on postdischarge glycemic control and insulin titration.MethodsWe randomly assigned 28 hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients who were discharged home on insulin therapy to routine specialty care (RSC) or RSC with daily remote glucose monitoring (RGM). We compared the primary outcome of mean blood glucose and exploratory outcomes of hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia rates, change in hemoglobin A_1c and glycated albumin, and insulin titration frequency between groups.ResultsMean blood glucose was not significantly different between the treatment arms (144 ± 34 mg/dL in the RSC group and 172 ± 41 mg/dL in the RGM group; not significant), nor were there significant differences in any of the other measures of glycemia during the month after discharge. Hypoglycemia (glucometer reading < 60 mg/dL) was common, occurring in 46% of subjects, with no difference between groups. In as-treated analysis, insulin dose adjustments (29% with an increase and 43% with decrease in insulin dose) occurred more frequently in the patients who used RGM (average of 2.8 vs. 1.2 dose adjustments; P = .03).ConclusionIn this pilot trial in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, RGM did not affect glycemic control after hospital discharge; however, the high rate of hypoglycemia in the postdischarge transition period and the higher frequency of insulin titration in patients who used RGM suggest a safety role for such monitoring in the transition from hospital to home. (Endocr Pract. 2015;21:115-121)     

Human insulin: study of safety and efficacy in man.

The safety and efficacy of a new highly purified neutral soluble human insulin produced by conversion of porcine insulin was compared with a highly purified neutral soluble porcine insulin in six normal men. The insulins were administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 0.075 U/kg body weight. Somatostatin was infused during the experiment to suppress endogenous insulin secretin. No difference was found in the plasma glucose, insulin, or metabolite responses. Thus the potency, onset, and duration of effect were identical with the two insulins. No short-term side effects to either insulin were observed. Highly purified, semi-synthetic human insulin offers a safe and effective means to explore the possible advantages of homologous human insulin in the management of diabetes mellitus.     

甘精胰岛素联合不同降糖药稳定2 型糖尿病血糖水平的效果

目的:评价甘精胰岛素联合沙格列汀或格列美脲稳定2型糖尿病血糖水平的作用效果。方法:将我院2收治的228例2型糖尿病患者按照随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组114人。研究组给予沙格列汀联合甘精胰岛素进行治疗,对照组给予格列美脲联合甘精胰岛素进行治疗。全部病例在治疗前4 d及治疗满16周时应用动态血糖监测仪实施72 h动态血糖监测。对比两组治疗前后血糖水平相关指标及血糖水平浮动相关指标的变化。结果:研究组治疗后体质指数显著低于对照组(P0.05)。两组治疗后空腹血糖均比本组治疗前显著下降(P0.05)。两组治疗后糖化血红蛋白均比本组治疗前显著下降(P0.05)。两组治疗后胰岛素用量无显著差异。两组平均血糖水平治疗前后无显著差异(P0.05)。研究组治疗后血糖标准差、日内血糖平均波动幅度、日内血糖波动次数、日间血糖平均绝对差改善幅度显著优于对照组。两组高血糖治疗后均比治疗前显著改善,改善幅度无显著差异(P0.05)。两组低血糖曲线下面积治疗前后无显著差异(P0.05)。结论:甘精胰岛素并用沙格列汀更能在显著控制2型糖尿病患者血糖的同时,还可使其血糖水平保持持久稳定,且不增加其低血糖的发生风险。     

A model for evaluation of the peroral insulin therapy: short-term treatment of alloxan diabetic rats with oral water-in-oil-in-water insulin emulsions.

Alloxan diabetic rats with fasting blood glucose levels above 300 mg/100 ml were treated with oral administration of water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) insulin emulsions at a dose of 50 U/100 g body weight, three times daily for 10 to 14 days. The course of diabetes was followed by determinations of glucose levels in blood and urine. During treatment with oral W/O/W insulin emulsions, daily excretion of urinary glucose decreased by about 30 to 40% (2 to 3 g/day) in all of the five rats studied, and returned to the pre-treatment levels after the treatment being discontinued. During treatment, a significant reduction in fasting blood glucose levels was observed in 4 out of 5 rats, giving the decrease by 18 to 44%. Quantitative estimates suggested that the effectiveness of 50 U/100 g of oral W/O/W insulin emulsions was comparable to that after intramuscular regular insulin at a dose of 0.5 U/100 g. Although oral W/O/W insulin emulsions are still of low efficiency, these results would indicate that diabetes can be controlled by effective oral insulin preparations.     

Platelet aggregation, rheological parameters and blood glucose profiles in diabetic children (type I) treated with human and porcine insulin

In a three-year bicentric cross-sectional investigation on type I diabetic children between six and eighteen years of age, blood sugar profiles and spontaneous thrombocyte aggregation were assessed besides anamnestic and clinical data. In the children treated with human insulin raised spontaneous thrombocyte aggregation was significantly more frequent than in those treated with porcine insulin. At the same time blood sugar fluctuation from day to day measured between seven and nine a.m. tended to be raised in the children treated with human insulin; the fluctuation in the diurnal profile measured for fourteen days was indeed very much greater. Since the two groups were comparable as to sex distribution, age, duration of disease, quality of compensation, application and dose of insulin, the greater fluctuation of blood sugar in the children treated with human insulin appears to be the cause for the raised spontaneous thrombocyte aggregation.     

Double blind clinical and laboratory study of hypoglycaemia with human and porcine insulin in diabetic patients reporting hypoglycaemia unawareness after transferring to human insulin.

OBJECTIVES--To compare awareness of hypoglycaemia and physiological responses to hypoglycaemia with human and porcine insulin in diabetic patients who reported loss of hypoglycaemia awareness after transferring to human insulin. DESIGN--Double blind randomised crossover study of clinical experience and physiological responses during slow fall hypoglycaemic clamping with porcine and human insulin. SETTING--Clinical investigation unit of teaching hospital recruiting from diabetes clinics of five teaching hospitals and one district general hospital. SUBJECTS--17 patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus of more than five years'' duration who had reported altered hypoglycaemia awareness within three months of transferring to human insulin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Glycaemic control and frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes during two months'' treatment with each insulin. Glucose thresholds for physiological and symptomatic responses during clamping. RESULTS--Glycaemic control did not change with either insulin. 136 hypoglycaemic episodes (eight severe) were reported with human insulin and 149 (nine severe) with porcine insulin (95% confidence interval -4 to 2.5, p = 0.63). 20 episodes of biochemical hypoglycaemia occurred with human insulin versus 18 with porcine insulin (-0.8 to 1, p = 0.78). During controlled hypoglycaemia the mean adrenaline response was 138 nmol/l/240 min for both insulins; neurohormonal responses were triggered at 3.0 (SE 0.2) versus 3.1 (0.2) mmol/l of glucose for adrenaline and 2.5 (0.1) versus 2.5 (0.1) mmol/l for subjective awareness. CONCLUSIONS--These data suggest that human insulin per se does not affect the presentation of hypoglycaemia or the neurohumoral, symptomatic, and cognitive function responses to hypoglycaemia in insulin dependent diabetic patients with a history of hypoglycaemia unawareness.     

大剂量胰岛素联合西格列汀对老年2 型糖尿病患者的疗效

目的:研究大剂量胰岛素联合西格列汀对老年2型糖尿病患者的疗效。方法:选择2012年1月~2015年12月在我院进行诊治的老年2型糖尿病患者82例,随机分为两组,观察组采用大剂量胰岛素联合西格列汀治疗,对照组采用大剂量胰岛素治疗,两组均治疗3个月。比较两组治疗前后的甘油三酯、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白和高密度脂蛋白水平,餐后2 h血糖、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白,胰岛素抵抗指数、胰岛素分泌指数、每日胰岛素总量和低血糖发生次数。结果:对照组治疗前后的血脂水平无明显差异(P0.05),观察组治疗后的甘油三酯、总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白明显降低(P0.05),高密度脂蛋白明显升高(P0.05);治疗后,两组的餐后2 h血糖、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白均明显降低(P0.05),且观察组降低更为明显(P0.05);对照组治疗前后的胰岛素抵抗指数、胰岛素分泌指数和每日胰岛素总量均无明显差异(P0.05),观察组治疗后的胰岛素抵抗指数和每日胰岛素总量均明显降低(P0.05),胰岛素分泌指数明显升高(P0.05);两组治疗前后低血糖发生次数和身体质量指数均无明显差异(P0.05)。结论:大剂量胰岛素联合西格列汀能有效控制老年2型糖尿病患者的血糖水平,改善胰岛β细胞功能,减少胰岛素用量,是一种安全有效的治疗方法。     

Effectiveness of Inpatient Insulin Order Sets Using Human Insulins in Noncritically Ill Patients in A Rural Hospital

Objective: Recent guidelines recommend a physiologic approach to non–intensive care unit (ICU) inpatient glucose management utilizing basal-bolus with correctional (BBC) insulin over traditional sliding-scale insulin monotherapy. Unfortunately, few studies exist using a BBC approach restricted to human insulins (regular and neutral protamine Hagedorn [NPH]). This study evaluated changes in provider prescribing patterns, effects on blood glucose, and safety with implementation of hospital order sets for BBC using human insulins.Methods: Order sets were developed for non-ICU inpatients, consisting of basal, prandial, and correctional insulin using NPH and regular human insulins. Evaluation compared a 4-month period before (admissions, n = 274) with a 4-month period after order set availability (n = 302). Primary outcome was change in insulin prescribing patterns. Secondary outcomes included use of nonpreferred diabetes treatments, hemoglobin A_1c testing, mean daily blood glucose, and incidence of hypoglycemia.Results: Use of BBC insulin regimen increased from 10.6 to 27.5% after order set implementation (P<.001). Use of oral antihyperglycemic agents decreased from 24.1 to 14.9% after implementation (P = .006). Hemoglobin A_1c testing rose from 50.0 to 62.3% after (P = .003). Mean daily blood glucose improved, with an estimated mean difference of 14.4 mg/dL (95% confidence interval, 2.2 to 26.5 mg/dL) over hospital days 3 through 9 (P = .02). There was no significant change in the incidence of moderate or severe hypoglycemia.Conclusion: Implementation of hospital-wide human insulin order sets led to improvements in prescribing practices and blood glucose control, without increasing the incidence of hypoglycemia. These order sets may be useful for facilities limited by formulary and cost considerations to the use of older human insulins.Abbreviations: BBC = basal-bolus with correctional insulin ICU = intensive care unit NPH = neutral protamine Hagedorn NPO = nil per os     

Twenty-four-hour metabolic profiles in diabetic children receiving insulin injections once or twice daily

Twenty-four-hour metabolic profiles were performed twice in each of 15 diabetic children, once when they were receiving single daily injections of insulin (Monotard plus Actrapid) and once on a twice-daily regimen (Semitard plus Actrapid). Before the study control was optimised at home on each regimen. There were no differences in overall 24-hour diabetic control on the two regimens as measured by mean blood glucose concentration, area under the blood glucose curve, M value, and 24-hour urinary glucose excretion. Hyperglycaemia after breakfast occurred on both regimens. Significant differences were noted before breakfast, when blood glucose and ketone concentrations were lower and plasma free insulin higher on the single-injection regimen, and after supper and during the night, when blood glucose values were lower on the two-injection regimen and associated with a rise in plasma free insulin after the evening injection. Once-daily injections provided insufficient circulating insulin after the evening meal, while twice-daily injections did not last through the night. Plasma C peptide, indicating residual endogenous insulin secretion, was just detectable in two children but easily detectable in four children, whose 24-hour diabetic control was significantly better than that in the remaining 11 children.Conclusions about the superiority of one insulin regimen over another must be based on specific differences in diabetic control. Both regimens studied achieved adequate control, and though neither provided physiological control specific modifications to the regimens could help to produce more normal profiles.