Printor, a Novel TorsinA-interacting Protein Implicated in Dystonia Pathogenesis

Early onset generalized dystonia (DYT1) is an autosomal dominant neurological disorder caused by deletion of a single glutamate residue (torsinA ΔE) in the C-terminal region of the AAA⁺ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) protein torsinA. The pathogenic mechanism by which torsinA ΔE mutation leads to dystonia remains unknown. Here we report the identification and characterization of a 628-amino acid novel protein, printor, that interacts with torsinA. Printor co-distributes with torsinA in multiple brain regions and co-localizes with torsinA in the endoplasmic reticulum. Interestingly, printor selectively binds to the ATP-free form but not to the ATP-bound form of torsinA, supporting a role for printor as a cofactor rather than a substrate of torsinA. The interaction of printor with torsinA is completely abolished by the dystonia-associated torsinA ΔE mutation. Our findings suggest that printor is a new component of the DYT1 pathogenic pathway and provide a potential molecular target for therapeutic intervention in dystonia.Early onset generalized torsion dystonia (DYT1) is the most common and severe form of hereditary dystonia, a movement disorder characterized by involuntary movements and sustained muscle spasms (1). This autosomal dominant disease has childhood onset and its dystonic symptoms are thought to result from neuronal dysfunction rather than neurodegeneration (2, 3). Most DYT1 cases are caused by deletion of a single glutamate residue at positions 302 or 303 (torsinA ΔE) of the 332-amino acid protein torsinA (4). In addition, a different torsinA mutation that deletes amino acids Phe³²³–Tyr³²⁸ (torsinA Δ323–328) was identified in a single family with dystonia (5), although the pathogenic significance of this torsinA mutation is unclear because these patients contain a concomitant mutation in another dystonia-related protein, ϵ-sarcoglycan (6). Recently, genetic association studies have implicated polymorphisms in the torsinA gene as a genetic risk factor in the development of adult-onset idiopathic dystonia (7, 8).TorsinA contains an N-terminal endoplasmic reticulum (ER)³ signal sequence and a 20-amino acid hydrophobic region followed by a conserved AAA⁺ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) domain (9, 10). Because members of the AAA⁺ family are known to facilitate conformational changes in target proteins (11, 12), it has been proposed that torsinA may function as a molecular chaperone (13, 14). TorsinA is widely expressed in brain and multiple other tissues (15) and is primarily associated with the ER and nuclear envelope (NE) compartments in cells (16–20). TorsinA is believed to mainly reside in the lumen of the ER and NE (17–19) and has been shown to bind lamina-associated polypeptide 1 (LAP1) (21), lumenal domain-like LAP1 (LULL1) (21), and nesprins (22). In addition, recent evidence indicates that a significant pool of torsinA exhibits a topology in which the AAA⁺ domain faces the cytoplasm (20). In support of this topology, torsinA is found in the cytoplasm, neuronal processes, and synaptic terminals (2, 3, 15, 23–26) and has been shown to bind cytosolic proteins snapin (27) and kinesin light chain 1 (20). TorsinA has been proposed to play a role in several cellular processes, including dopaminergic neurotransmission (28–31), NE organization and dynamics (17, 22, 32), and protein trafficking (27, 33). However, the precise biological function of torsinA and its regulation remain unknown.To gain insights into torsinA function, we performed yeast two-hybrid screens to search for torsinA-interacting proteins in the brain. We report here the isolation and characterization of a novel protein named printor (protein interactor of torsinA) that interacts selectively with wild-type (WT) torsinA but not the dystonia-associated torsinA ΔE mutant. Our data suggest that printor may serve as a cofactor of torsinA and provide a new molecular target for understanding and treating dystonia.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

A Straight Path to Circular Proteins

Folding and stability are parameters that control protein behavior. The possibility of conferring additional stability on proteins has implications for their use in vivo and for their structural analysis in the laboratory. Cyclic polypeptides ranging in size from 14 to 78 amino acids occur naturally and often show enhanced resistance toward denaturation and proteolysis when compared with their linear counterparts. Native chemical ligation and intein-based methods allow production of circular derivatives of larger proteins, resulting in improved stability and refolding properties. Here we show that circular proteins can be made reversibly with excellent efficiency by means of a sortase-catalyzed cyclization reaction, requiring only minimal modification of the protein to be circularized.Sortases are bacterial enzymes that predominantly catalyze the attachment of surface proteins to the bacterial cell wall (1, 2). Other sortases polymerize pilin subunits for the construction of the covalently stabilized and covalently anchored pilus of the Gram-positive bacterium (3–5). The reaction catalyzed by sortase involves the recognition of short 5-residue sequence motifs, which are cleaved by the enzyme with the concomitant formation of an acyl enzyme intermediate between the active site cysteine of sortase and the carboxylate at the newly generated C terminus of the substrate (1, 6–8). In many bacteria, this covalent intermediate can be resolved by nucleophilic attack from the pentaglycine side chain in a peptidoglycan precursor, resulting in the formation of an amide bond between the pentaglycine side chain and the carboxylate at the cleavage site in the substrate (9, 10). In pilus construction, alternative nucleophiles such as lysine residues or diaminopimelic acid participate in the transpeptidation reaction (3, 4).When appended near the C terminus of proteins that are not natural sortase substrates, the recognition sequence of Staphylococcus aureus sortase A (LPXTG) can be used to effectuate a sortase-catalyzed transpeptidation reaction using a diverse array of artificial glycine-based nucleophiles (Fig. 1). The result is efficient installation of a diverse set of moieties, including lipids (11), carbohydrates (12), peptide nucleic acids (13), biotin (14), fluorophores (14, 15), polymers (16), solid supports (16–18), or peptides (15, 19) at the C terminus of the protein substrate. During the course of our studies to further expand sortase-based protein engineering, we were struck by the frequency and relative ease with which intramolecular transpeptidation reactions were occurring. Specifically, proteins equipped with not only the LPXTG motif but also N-terminal glycine residues yielded covalently closed circular polypeptides (Fig. 1). Similar reactivity using sortase has been described in two previous cases; however, rigorous characterization of the circular polypeptides was absent (16, 20). The circular proteins in these reports were observed as minor components of more complex reaction mixtures, and the cyclization reaction itself was not optimized.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Protein substrates equipped with a sortase A recognition sequence (LPXTG) can participate in intermolecular transpeptidation with synthetic oligoglycine nucleophiles (left) or intramolecular transpeptidation if an N-terminal glycine residue is present (right).Here we describe our efforts toward applying sortase-catalyzed transpeptidation to the synthesis of circular and oligomeric proteins. This method has general applicability, as illustrated by successful intramolecular reactions with three structurally unrelated proteins. In addition to circularization of individual protein units, the multiprotein complex AAA-ATPase p97/VCP/CDC48, with six identical subunits containing the LPXTG motif and an N-terminal glycine, was found to preferentially react in daisy chain fashion to yield linear protein fusions. The reaction exploited here shows remarkable similarities to the mechanisms proposed for circularization of cyclotides, small circular proteins that have been isolated from plants (21–23).     

PTIP Regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA Damage Sites

Although PTIP is implicated in the DNA damage response, through interactions with 53BP1, the function of PTIP in the DNA damage response remain elusive. Here, we show that RNF8 controls DNA damage-induced nuclear foci formation of PTIP, which in turn regulates 53BP1 localization to the DNA damage sites. In addition, SMC1, a substrate of ATM, could not be phosphorylated at the DNA damage sites in the absence of PTIP. The PTIP-dependent pathway is important for DNA double strand breaks repair and DNA damage-induced intra-S phase checkpoint activation. Taken together, these results suggest that the role of PTIP in the DNA damage response is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1. Thus, PTIP regulates 53BP1-dependent signaling pathway following DNA damage.The DNA damage response pathways are signal transduction pathways with DNA damage sensors, mediators, and effectors, which are essential for maintaining genomic stability (1–3). Following DNA double strand breaks, histone H2AX at the DNA damage sites is rapidly phosphorylated by ATM/ATR/DNAPK (4–10), a family homologous to phosphoinositide 3-kinases (11, 12). Subsequently, phospho-H2AX (γH2AX) provides the platform for accumulation of a larger group of DNA damage response factors, such as MDC1, BRCA1, 53BP1, and the MRE11·RAD50·NBS1 complex (13, 14), at the DNA damage sites. Translocalization of these proteins to the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)³ facilitates DNA damage checkpoint activation and enhances the efficiency of DNA damage repair (14, 15).Recently, PTIP (Pax2 transactivation domain-interacting protein, or Paxip) has been identified as a DNA damage response protein and is required for cell survival when exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) (1, 16–18). PTIP is a 1069-amino acid nuclear protein and has been originally identified in a yeast two-hybrid screening as a partner of Pax2 (19). Genetic deletion of the PTIP gene in mice leads to early embryonic lethality at embryonic day 8.5, suggesting that PTIP is essential for early embryonic development (20). Structurally, PTIP contains six tandem BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) domains (16–18, 21). The BRCT domain is a phospho-group binding domain that mediates protein-protein interactions (17, 22, 23). Interestingly, the BRCT domain has been found in a large number of proteins involved in the cellular response to DNA damages, such as BRCA1, MDC1, and 53BP1 (7, 24–29). Like other BRCT domain-containing proteins, upon exposure to IR, PTIP forms nuclear foci at the DSBs, which is dependent on its BRCT domains (16–18). By protein affinity purification, PTIP has been found in two large complexes. One includes the histone H3K4 methyltransferase ALR and its associated cofactors, the other contains DNA damage response proteins, including 53BP1 and SMC1 (30, 31). Further experiments have revealed that DNA damage enhances the interaction between PTIP and 53BP1 (18, 31).To elucidate the DNA damage response pathways, we have examined the upstream and downstream partners of PTIP. Here, we report that PTIP is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1 in response to DNA damage. Moreover, PTIP and 53BP1 are required for the phospho-ATM association with the chromatin, which phosphorylates SMC1 at the DSBs. This PTIP-dependent pathway is involved in DSBs repair.     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

Algorithms for Finding Small Attractors in Boolean Networks

A Boolean network is a model used to study the interactions between different genes in genetic regulatory networks. In this paper, we present several algorithms using gene ordering and feedback vertex sets to identify singleton attractors and small attractors in Boolean networks. We analyze the average case time complexities of some of the proposed algorithms. For instance, it is shown that the outdegree-based ordering algorithm for finding singleton attractors works in time for , which is much faster than the naive time algorithm, where is the number of genes and is the maximum indegree. We performed extensive computational experiments on these algorithms, which resulted in good agreement with theoretical results. In contrast, we give a simple and complete proof for showing that finding an attractor with the shortest period is NP-hard.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Genetic Analysis of the nuo Locus,Which Encodes the Proton-Translocating NADH Dehydrogenase in Escherichia coli

Complex I (EC 1.6.99.3) of the bacterium Escherichia coli is considered to be the minimal form of the type I NADH dehydrogenase, the first enzyme complex in the respiratory chain. Because of its small size and relative simplicity, the E. coli enzyme has become a model used to identify and characterize the mechanism(s) by which cells regulate the synthesis and assembly of this large respiratory complex. To begin dissecting the processes by which E. coli cells regulate the expression of nuo and the assembly of complex I, we undertook a genetic analysis of the nuo locus, which encodes the 14 Nuo subunits comprising E. coli complex I. Here we present the results of studies, performed on an isogenic collection of nuo mutants, that focus on the physiological, biochemical, and molecular consequences caused by the lack of or defects in several Nuo subunits. In particular, we present evidence that NuoG, a peripheral subunit, is essential for complex I function and that it plays a role in the regulation of nuo expression and/or the assembly of complex I.

Complex I (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase; EC 1.6.99.3), a type I NADH dehydrogenase that couples the oxidation of NADH to the generation of a proton motive force, is the first enzyme complex of the respiratory chain (2, 35, 47). The Escherichia coli enzyme, considered to be the minimal form of complex I, consists of 14 subunits instead of the 40 to 50 subunits associated with the homologous eukaryotic mitochondrial enzyme (17, 29, 30, 48–50). E. coli also possesses a second NADH dehydrogenase, NDH-II, which does not generate a proton motive force (31). E. coli complex I resembles eukaryotic complex I in many ways (16, 17, 30, 49): it performs the same enzymatic reaction and is sensitive to a number of the same inhibitors, it consists of subunits homologous to those found in all proton-translocating NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductases studied thus far, it is comprised of a large number of subunits relative to the number that comprise other respiratory enzymes, and it contains flavin mononucleotide and FeS center prosthetic groups. Additionally, it possesses an L-shaped topology (14, 22) like that of its Neurospora crassa homolog (27), and it consists of distinct fragments or subcomplexes. Whereas eukaryotic complex I can be dissected into a peripheral arm and a membrane arm, the E. coli enzyme consists of three subcomplexes referred to as the peripheral, connecting, and membrane fragments (29) (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). The subunit composition of these three fragments correlates approximately with the organization of the 14 structural genes (nuoA to nuoN) (49) of the nuo (for NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase) locus (Fig. ​(Fig.1B),1B), an organization that is conserved in several other bacteria, including Salmonella typhimurium (3), Paracoccus denitrificans (53), Rhodobacter capsulatus (12), and Thermus thermophilus (54). The 5′ half of the locus contains a promoter (nuoP), previously identified and located upstream of nuoA (8, 49), and the majority of genes that encode subunits homologous to the nucleus-encoded subunits of eukaryotic complex I and to subunits of the Alcaligenes eutrophus NAD-reducing hydrogenase (17, 29, 30, 49). In contrast, the 3′ half contains the majority of the genes that encode subunits homologous to the mitochondrion-encoded subunits of eukaryotic complex I and to subunits of the E. coli formate-hydrogen lyase complex (17, 29, 30, 49). Whereas the nuclear homologs NuoE, NuoF, and NuoG constitute the peripheral fragment (also referred to as the NADH dehydrogenase fragment [NDF]), the nuclear homologs NuoB, NuoC, NuoD, and NuoI constitute the connecting fragment. The mitochondrial homologs NuoA, NuoH, NuoJ, NuoK, NuoL, NuoM, and NuoN constitute the membrane fragment (29). E. coli complex I likely evolved by fusion of preexisting protein assemblies constituting modules for electron transfer and proton translocation (17–19, 30). Open in a separate windowFIG. 1Schematic of E. coli complex I and the nuo locus. Adapted with permission of the publisher (17, 29, 30, 49). (A) E. coli complex I is comprised of three distinct fragments: the peripheral (light gray), connecting (white), and membrane (dark gray) fragments (17, 29). The peripheral fragment (NDF) is comprised of the nuclear homologs NuoE, -F, and -G and exhibits NADH dehydrogenase activity that oxidizes NADH to NAD⁺; the connecting fragment is comprised of the nuclear homologs NuoB, -C, -D, and -I; and the membrane fragment is comprised of the mitochondrial homologs NuoA, -H, and -J to -N and catalyzes ubiquinone (Q) to its reduced form (QH₂). FMN, flavin mononucleotide. (B) The E. coli nuo locus encodes the 14 Nuo subunits that constitute complex I. The 5′ half of the locus contains a previously identified promoter (nuoP) and the majority of genes that encode the peripheral and connecting subunits (light gray and white, respectively). The 3′ half of the locus contains the majority of the genes encoding the membrane subunits (dark gray). The 3′ end of nuoG encodes a C-Terminal region (CTR) of the NuoG subunit (hatched).Because of its smaller size and relative simplicity, researchers recently have begun to utilize complex I of E. coli, and that of its close relative S. typhimurium, to identify and characterize the mechanism(s) by which cells regulate the synthesis and assembly of this large respiratory complex (3, 8, 46) and to investigate the diverse physiological consequences caused by defects in this enzyme (4, 6, 10, 40, 59). Such defects affect the ability of cells to perform chemotaxis (40), to grow on certain carbon sources (4, 6, 10, 40, 57), to survive stationary phase (59), to perform energy-dependent proteolysis (4), to regulate the expression of at least one gene (32), and to maintain virulence (5).To begin dissecting the processes by which E. coli cells regulate the expression of nuo and the assembly of complex I, we undertook a genetic analysis of the nuo locus. Here, we present the results of studies, performed on an isogenic collection of nuo mutants, that focus on the physiological, biochemical, and molecular consequences caused by the lack of or defects in several Nuo subunits. In particular, we present evidence that NuoG, a peripheral subunit, is essential for complex I function and that it plays a role in the regulation of nuo expression and/or the assembly of complex I.     

FANCI Protein Binds to DNA and Interacts with FANCD2 to Recognize Branched Structures

In this study, we report that the purified wild-type FANCI (Fanconi anemia complementation group I) protein directly binds to a variety of DNA substrates. The DNA binding domain roughly encompasses residues 200–1000, as suggested by the truncation study. When co-expressed in insect cells, a small fraction of FANCI forms a stable complex with FANCD2 (Fanconi anemia complementation group D2). Intriguingly, the purified FANCI-FANCD2 complex preferentially binds to the branched DNA structures when compared with either FANCI or FANCD2 alone. Co-immunoprecipitation with purified proteins indicates that FANCI interacts with FANCD2 through its C-terminal amino acid 1001–1328 fragment. Although the C terminus of FANCI is dispensable for direct DNA binding, it seems to be involved in the regulation of DNA binding activity. This notion is further enhanced by two C-terminal point mutations, R1285Q and D1301A, which showed differentiated DNA binding activity. We also demonstrate that FANCI forms discrete nuclear foci in HeLa cells in the absence or presence of exogenous DNA damage. The FANCI foci are colocalized perfectly with FANCD2 and partially with proliferating cell nuclear antigen irrespective of mitomycin C treatment. An increased number of FANCI foci form and become resistant to Triton X extraction in response to mitomycin C treatment. Our data suggest that the FANCI-FANCD2 complex may participate in repair of damaged replication forks through its preferential recognition of branched structures.Fanconi anemia (FA)³ is a genetic disorder characterized by chromosome instability, predisposition to cancer, hypersensitivity to DNA cross-linking agents, developmental abnormalities, and bone marrow failure (1–9). There are at least 13 distinct FA complementation groups, each of which is associated with an identified gene (2, 9, 10). Eight of them are components of the FA core complex (FANC A, B, C, E, F, G, L, and M) that is epistatic to the monoubiquitination of both FANCI and FANCD2, a key event to initiate interstrand cross-link (ICL) repair (2, 9, 11). Downstream of or parallel to the FANCI and FANCD2 monoubiquitination are the proteins involved in double strand break repair and breast cancer susceptibility (i.e. FANCD1/BRCA2, FANCJ/BRIP1, and FANCN/PALB2) (2, 9).FANCI is the most recently identified FA gene (11–13). FANCI protein is believed to form a FANCI-FANCD2 (ID) complex with FANCD2, because they co-immunoprecipitate with each other from cell lysates and their stabilities are interdependent of each other (9, 11, 13). FANCI and FANCD2 are paralogs to each other, since they share sequence homology and co-evolve in the same species (11). Both FANCI and FANCD2 can be phosphorylated by ATR/ATM (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related/ataxia telangiectasia-mutated) kinases under genotoxic stress (11, 14, 15). The phosphorylation of FANCI seems to function as a molecular switch to turn on the FA repair pathway (16). The monoubiquitination of FANCD2 at lysine 561 plays a critical role in cellular resistance to DNA cross-linking agents and is required for FANCD2 to form damage-induced foci with BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51, FANCJ, FANCN, and γ-H2AX on chromatin during S phase of the cell cycle (17–25). In response to DNA damage or replication stress, FANCI is also monoubiquitinated at lysine 523 and recruited to the DNA repair nuclear foci (11, 13). The monoubiquitination of both FANCI and FANCD2 depends on the FA core complex (11, 13, 26), and the ubiquitination of FANCI relies on the FANCD2 monoubiquitination (2, 11). In an in vitro minimally reconstituted system, FANCI enhances FANCD2 monoubiquitination and increases its specificity toward the in vivo ubiquitination site (27).FANCI is a leucine-rich peptide (14.8% of leucine residues) with limited sequence information to indicate which processes it might be involved in. Besides the monoubiquitination site Lys⁵²³ and the putative nuclear localization signals (Fig. 1A), FANCI contains both ARM (armadillo) repeats and a conserved C-terminal EDGE motif as FANCD2 does (11, 28). The EDGE sequence in FANCD2 is not required for monoubiquitination but is required for mitomycin C (MMC) sensitivity (28). The ARM repeats form α-α superhelix folds and are involved in mediating protein-protein interactions (11, 29). In addition, FANCI, at its N terminus, contains a leucine zipper domain (aa 130–151) that could be involved in mediating protein-protein or protein-DNA interactions (Fig. 1A) (30–33). FANCD2, the paralog of FANCI, was reported to bind to double strand DNA ends and Holliday junctions (34).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Purified human FANCI binds to DNA promiscuously. A, schematic diagram of predicted FANCI motifs and mutagenesis strategy to define the DNA binding domain. The ranges of numbers indicate how FANCI was truncated (e.g. 801–1328 represents FANCI-(801–1328)). NLS, predicted nuclear localization signal (aa 779–795 and 1323–1328); K523, lysine 523, the monoubiquitination site. The leucine zipper (orange bars, aa 130–151), ARM repeats (green bars), and EDGE motif (blue bars) are indicated. Red bars with a slash indicate the point mutations shown on the left. B, SDS-PAGE of the purified proteins stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. R1285Q and D1301A are two point mutants of FANCI. All FANCI variants are tagged by hexahistidine. FANCD2 is in its native form. Protein markers in kilodaltons are indicated. C, titration of WT-FANCI for the DNA binding activity. Diagrams of the DNA substrates are shown at the top of each set of reactions. *, ³²P-labeled 5′-end. HJ, Holliday junction. Concentrations of FANCI were 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 nm (ascending triangles). The substrate concentration was 1 nm. Protein-DNA complex is indicated by an arrow. D, supershift assay. 1 nm of ssDNA was incubated with PBS (lane 1), 80 nm FANCI alone (lane 2), and 80 nm FANCI preincubated with a specific FANCI antibody (lane 3) in the condition described under “Experimental Procedures.”In order to delineate the function of FANCI protein, we purified the recombinant FANCI from the baculovirus expression system. In this study, we report the DNA binding activity of FANCI. Unlike FANCD2, FANCI binds to different DNA structures, including single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), 5′-tailed, 3′-tailed, splayed arm, 5′-flap, 3′-flap, static fork, and Holliday junction with preference toward branched structures in the presence of FANCD2. Our data suggest that the dynamic DNA binding activity of FANCI and the preferential recognition of branched structures by the ID complex are likely to be the mechanisms to initiate downstream repair events.     

Contribution of Flavin Covalent Linkage with Histidine 99 to the Reaction Catalyzed by Choline Oxidase

The FAD-dependent choline oxidase has a flavin cofactor covalently attached to the protein via histidine 99 through an 8α-N(3)-histidyl linkage. The enzyme catalyzes the four-electron oxidation of choline to glycine betaine, forming betaine aldehyde as an enzyme-bound intermediate. The variant form of choline oxidase in which the histidine residue has been replaced with asparagine was used to investigate the contribution of the 8α-N(3)-histidyl linkage of FAD to the protein toward the reaction catalyzed by the enzyme. Decreases of 10-fold and 30-fold in the k_cat/K_m and k_cat values were observed as compared with wild-type choline oxidase at pH 10 and 25 °C, with no significant effect on k_cat/K_O using choline as substrate. Both the k_cat/K_m and k_cat values increased with increasing pH to limiting values at high pH consistent with the participation of an unprotonated group in the reductive half-reaction and the overall turnover of the enzyme. The pH independence of both ^D(k_cat/K_m) and ^Dk_cat, with average values of 9.2 ± 3.3 and 7.4 ± 0.5, respectively, is consistent with absence of external forward and reverse commitments to catalysis, and the chemical step of CH bond cleavage being rate-limiting for both the reductive half-reaction and the overall enzyme turnover. The temperature dependence of the ^Dk_red values suggests disruption of the preorganization in the asparagine variant enzyme. Altogether, the data presented in this study are consistent with the FAD-histidyl covalent linkage being important for the optimal positioning of the hydride ion donor and acceptor in the tunneling reaction catalyzed by choline oxidase.A number of enzymes, including dehydrogenases (1–3), monooxygenases (4–7), halogenases (8–11), and oxidases (7, 12, 13), employ flavin cofactors (FAD or FMN) for their catalytic processes. About a tenth of all flavoproteins have been shown to contain a covalently attached cofactor, which may be linked at the C8M position via histidyl, tyrosyl, or cysteinyl side chains or at the C6M position via a cysteinyl side chain (14). Glucooligosaccharide oxidase (15, 16), hexose oxidase (17), and berberine bridge enzyme (18, 19) are examples of flavoproteins (FAD as cofactor) with both linkages present in one flavin molecule. The covalent linkages in flavin-dependent enzymes have been shown to stabilize protein structure (20–22), prevent loss of loosely bound flavin cofactors (23), modulate the redox potential of the flavin microenvironment (20, 23–27), facilitate electron transfer reactions (28), and contribute to substrate binding as in the case of the cysteinyl linkage (20). However, no study has implicated a mechanistic role of the flavin covalent linkages in enzymatic reactions in which a hydride ion is transferred by quantum mechanical tunneling.The discovery of quantum mechanical tunneling in enzymatic reactions, in which hydrogen atoms, protons, and hydride ions are transferred, has attracted considerable interest in enzyme studies geared toward understanding the mechanisms underlying the several orders of magnitudes in the rate enhancements of protein-catalyzed reactions compared with non-enzymatic ones. Tunneling mechanisms have been shown in a wide array of cofactor-dependent enzymes, including flavoenzymes. Examples of flavoenzymes in which the tunneling mechanisms have been demonstrated include morphinone reductase (29, 30), pentaerythritol tetranitrate reductase (29), glucose oxidase (31–33), and choline oxidase (34). Mechanistic data on Class 2 dihydroorotate dehydrogenases, also with a flavin cofactor (FMN) covalently linked to the protein moiety (35, 36), could only propose a mechanism that is either stepwise or concerted with significant quantum mechanical tunneling for the hydride transfer from C6 and the deprotonation at C5 in the oxidation of dihydroorotate to orotate (37). This leaves choline oxidase as the only characterized enzyme with a covalently attached flavin cofactor (12, 38), where the oxidation of its substrate occurs unequivocally by quantum mechanical tunneling.Choline oxidase from Arthrobacter globiformis catalyzes the two-step FAD-dependent oxidation of the primary alcohol substrate choline to glycine betaine with betaine aldehyde, which is predominantly bound to the enzyme and forms a gem-diol species, as intermediate (Scheme 1). Glycine betaine accumulates in the cytoplasm of plants and bacteria as a defensive mechanism against stress conditions, thus making genetic engineering of relevant plants of economic interest (39–45), and the biosynthetic pathway for the osmolyte is a potential drug target in human microbial infections of clinical interest (46–48). The first oxidation step catalyzed by choline oxidase involves the transfer of a hydride ion from a deprotonated choline to the protein-bound flavin followed by reaction of the anionic flavin hydroquinone with molecular oxygen to regenerate the oxidized FAD (for a recent review see Ref. 50). The gem-diol choline, i.e. hydrated betaine aldehyde, is the substrate for the second oxidation step (49), suggesting that the reaction may follow a similar mechanism. The isoalloxazine ring of the flavin cofactor, which is buried within the protein, is physically constrained through a covalent linkage via the C(8) methyl of the flavin and the N(3) atom of the histidine side chain at position 99 (Fig. 1) (12). Also contributing to the physical constrain are the proximity of Ile-103 to the pyrimidine ring and the interactions of the backbone atoms of residues His-99 through Ile-103 with the isoalloxazine ring. The rigid positioning of the isoalloxazine ring could only permit a solvent-excluded cavity of ∼125 ų adjacent to the re face of the FAD to accommodate a 93-ų choline molecule in the substrate binding domain (12). Mechanistic data thus far obtained on choline oxidase, coupled with the crystal structure of the wild-type enzyme resolved to 1.86 Å, are consistent with a quantum tunneling mechanism for the hydride ion transfer occurring within a highly preorganized enzyme-substrate complex (Scheme 2) (12, 34, 50). Exploitation of the tunneling mechanism requires minimal independent movement of the hydride ion donor and acceptor, with the only dynamic motions permitted being the ones that promote the hydride transfer reaction.Open in a separate windowSCHEME 1.Two-step, four-electron oxidation of choline catalyzed by choline oxidase.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.x-ray crystal structure of the active site of wild-type choline oxidase resolved to 1.86 Å (PDB 2jbv). Note the significant distortion of the flavin ring at the C(4a) atom, which is due to the presence of a C(4a) adduct (69).Open in a separate windowSCHEME 2.The hydride ion transfer reaction from the α-carbon of the activated choline alkoxide species to the N(5) atom of the isoalloxazine ring of the enzyme-bound flavin in choline oxidase.In the present study, the contribution of the physically constrained flavin isoalloxazine ring to the reaction catalyzed by choline oxidase has been investigated in a variant enzyme in which the histidine residue at position 99 was replaced with an asparagine. The results suggest that, although not being required per se, the covalent linkage in choline oxidase contributes to the hydride tunneling reaction by either preventing independent movement or contributing to the optimal positioning of the flavin acting as hydride ion acceptor with respect to the alkoxide species acting as a donor. However, the covalent linkage is not required for the reaction.