MEIOTIC F-BOX Is Essential for Male Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Rice

F-box proteins constitute a large superfamily in plants and play important roles in controlling many biological processes, but the roles of F-box proteins in male meiosis in plants remain unclear. Here, we identify the rice (Oryza sativa) F-box gene MEIOTIC F-BOX (MOF), which is essential for male meiotic progression. MOF belongs to the FBX subfamily and is predominantly active during leptotene to pachytene of prophase I. mof meiocytes display disrupted telomere bouquet formation, impaired pairing and synapsis of homologous chromosomes, and arrested meiocytes at late prophase I, followed by apoptosis. Although normal, programmed double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) form in mof mutants, foci of the phosphorylated histone variant γH2AX, a marker for DSBs, persist in the mutant, indicating that many of the DSBs remained unrepaired. The recruitment of Completion of meiosis I (COM1) and Radiation sensitive51C (RAD51C) to DSBs is severely compromised in mutant meiocytes, indicating that MOF is crucial for DSB end-processing and repair. Further analyses showed that MOF could physically interact with the rice SKP1-like Protein1 (OSK1), indicating that MOF functions as a component of the SCF E3 ligase to regulate meiotic progression in rice. Thus, this study reveals the essential role of an F-box protein in plant meiosis and provides helpful information for elucidating the roles of the ubiquitin proteasome system in plant meiotic progression.     

DNA Damage-Induced Phosphorylation of TRF2 Is Required for the Fast Pathway of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

Protein kinases of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-like kinase family, originally known to act in maintaining genomic integrity via DNA repair pathways, have been shown to also function in telomere maintenance. Here we focus on the functional role of DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of the essential mammalian telomeric DNA binding protein TRF2, which coordinates the assembly of the proteinaceous cap to disguise the chromosome end from being recognized as a double-stand break (DSB). Previous results suggested a link between the transient induction of human TRF2 phosphorylation at threonine 188 (T188) by the ataxia telangiectasia mutated protein kinase (ATM) and the DNA damage response. Here, we report evidence that X-ray-induced phosphorylation of TRF2 at T188 plays a role in the fast pathway of DNA DSB repair. These results connect the highly transient induction of human TRF2 phosphorylation to the DNA damage response machinery. Thus, we find that a protein known to function in telomere maintenance, TRF2, also plays a functional role in DNA DSB repair.Telomeres act as protective caps to disguise the chromosome end from being recognized as a DNA double-strand break (DSB) and play other important roles in maintaining genomic integrity (2, 21, 26). Telomere capping dysfunction resulting in genomic instability is likely a major pathway leading to human cancers and other age-related diseases (8, 27).An increasing number of proteins known to play important roles in DNA repair have also been found to be critical for telomere maintenance (6). Specifically, phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase-like kinase family members, such as ataxia telangiectasia mutated protein kinase (ATM) and the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in mammals, originally known to act in maintaining genomic stability via DNA repair pathways, have been shown to be important in telomere maintenance (1, 4, 7, 9, 10, 16, 25). Previous reports indicate that ATM is required for the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of two major telomere-associated proteins in mammals, human TRF1 and TRF2 (16, 28). The specific molecular roles played by the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of TRF1 and TRF2 in telomere maintenance and/or DNA repair are unclear and under active investigation. We previously reported that upon DNA damage, human TRF2 was rapidly and transiently phosphorylated at threonine 188 (T188) (28). Here, we report that X-ray-induced phosphorylation of human TRF2 at T188 plays a functional role in the fast pathway of DNA DSB repair.     

Mek1 Suppression of Meiotic Double-Strand Break Repair Is Specific to Sister Chromatids,Chromosome Autonomous and Independent of Rec8 Cohesin Complexes

During meiosis, recombination is directed to occur between homologous chromosomes to create connections necessary for proper segregation at meiosis I. Partner choice is determined at the time of strand invasion and is mediated by two recombinases: Rad51 and the meiosis-specific Dmc1. In budding yeast, interhomolog bias is created in part by the activity of a meiosis-specific kinase, Mek1, which is localized to the protein cores of condensed sister chromatids. Analysis of meiotic double-strand break (DSB) repair in haploid and disomic haploid strains reveals that Mek1 suppresses meiotic intersister DSB repair by working directly on sister chromatids. Rec8 cohesin complexes are not required, however, either for suppression of intersister DSB repair or for the repair itself. Regulation of DSB repair in meiosis is chromosome autonomous such that unrepaired breaks on haploid chromosomes do not prevent interhomolog repair between disomic homologs. The pattern of DSB repair in haploids containing Dmc1 and/or Rad51 indicates that Mek1 acts on Rad51-specific recombination processes.IN eukaryotes, meiosis is a specialized type of cell division that produces the gametes required for sexual reproduction. In meiosis, one round of DNA replication is followed by two rounds of chromosome segregation, termed meiosis I and II. As a result of the two divisions, four haploid cells are produced, each containing half the number of chromosomes as the diploid parent. Proper segregation at meiosis I requires connections between homologous chromosomes that are created by a combination of sister chromatid cohesion and recombination (Petronczki et al. 2003). In vegetative cells, cohesion is mediated by multisubunit ring-shaped complexes that are removed by proteolysis of the kleisin subunit, Mcd1/Scc1 (Onn et al. 2008). In meiotic cells, introduction of a meiosis-specific kleisin subunit, Rec8, allows for a two-step removal of cohesion with loss of arm cohesion at anaphase I and centromere cohesion at anaphase II (Klein et al. 1999). Missegregation of chromosomes during meiosis causes abnormal chromosome numbers in gametes that may lead to infertility and genetic disorders such as trisomy 21 or Down''s syndrome.In mitotically dividing budding yeast cells, recombination is mediated by an evolutionarily conserved RecA-like recombinase, Rad51, and occurs preferentially between sister chromatids (Kadyk and Hartwell 1992). In contrast, recombination during meiosis is initiated by the deliberate formation of double-strand breaks (DSBs) by an evolutionarily conserved, topoisomerase-like protein, Spo11, and occurs preferentially between homologous chromosomes (Jackson and Fink 1985; Schwacha and Kleckner 1997; Keeney 2001). After DSB formation, the 5′ ends on either side of the breaks are resected, resulting in 3′ single stranded (ss) tails. Rad51, and the meiosis-specific recombinase Dmc1, bind to the 3′ ssDNA tails to form protein/DNA filaments that promote strand invasion of homologous chromosomes. DNA synthesis and ligation result in the formation of double Holliday junctions, which are then preferentially resolved into crossovers (Allers and Lichten 2001; Hunter 2007).The precise roles that the Rad51 and Dmc1 recombinase activities play in meiotic recombination have been unclear because experiments have indicated both overlapping and distinct functions for the two proteins (Sheridan and Bishop 2006; Hunter 2007). While both rad51Δ and dmc1Δ mutants reduce interhomolog recombination, other studies suggest that Rad51, in complex with the accessory protein Rad54, is involved primarily in intersister DSB repair. In contrast, Dmc1, in conjunction with the accessory protein Rdh54/Tid1 (a paralog of Rad54), effects DSB repair in meiotic cells by invasion of nonsister chromatids (Dresser et al. 1997; Schwacha and Kleckner 1997; Shinohara et al. 1997a,b; Arbel et al. 1999; Bishop et al. 1999; Hayase et al. 2004; Sheridan and Bishop 2006).The preference for recombination to occur between homologous chromosomes during meiosis is created in part by Dmc1. DSBs accumulate in dmc1Δ diploids due to a failure in strand invasion (Bishop et al. 1992; Hunter and Kleckner 2001). In the efficiently sporulating SK1 strain background, these unrepaired breaks trigger the meiotic recombination checkpoint, resulting in prophase arrest (Lydall et al. 1996; Roeder and Bailis 2000). In dmc1Δ mutants, Rad51 is present at DSBs, yet there is no strand invasion of sister chromatids (Bishop 1994; Shinohara et al. 1997a). These results suggest that in addition to Dmc1 promoting interhomolog strand invasion, Rad51 activity must also be suppressed.Recent studies have shown that during meiosis Rad51 recombinase activity is inhibited by two different mechanisms that decrease the formation of Rad51/Rad54 complexes: (1) binding of the meiosis-specific Hed1 protein to Rad51, thereby excluding interaction with Rad54, and (2) reduction in the affinity of Rad54 for Rad51 due to phosphorylation of Rad54 by Mek1 (Tsubouchi and Roeder 2006; Busygina et al. 2008; Niu et al. 2009). Mek1 is a meiosis-specific kinase that is activated in response to DSBs (Niu et al. 2005, 2007; Carballo et al. 2008). In addition to phosphorylating Rad54, Mek1 phosphorylation of an as yet undetermined substrate is required to suppress Rad51/Rad54-mediated strand invasion of sister chromatids (Niu et al. 2009).To dissect the mechanism by which Mek1 suppresses meiotic intersister DSB repair, we took advantage of the ability of yeast cells to undergo haploid meiosis. The lack of homologous chromosomes in haploid cells makes it possible to examine sister-chromatid-specific events in the absence of interhomolog recombination. De Massy et al. (1994) previously observed a delay in DSB repair in haploid cells and proposed that this delay was due to a constraint in using sister chromatids. We have shown that this delay is dependent on MEK1 and utilized the haploid system to determine various biological parameters required to suppress meiotic intersister DSB repair. Our results indicate that Rad51 and Dmc1 recombinase activities have distinct roles during meiosis and that interhomolog bias is established specifically on sister chromatids through regulation of Rad51, not Dmc1. rec8Δ diploids exhibit defects in meiotic DSB repair (Klein et al. 1999; Brar et al. 2009). Given that cohesin complexes are specific for sister chromatids, we investigated the role of REC8 in intersister DSB repair and found it is required neither for suppressing intersister DSB repair during meiosis nor for the repair itself.     

The Arabidopsis BLAP75/Rmi1 Homologue Plays Crucial Roles in Meiotic Double-Strand Break Repair

In human cells and in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, BLAP75/Rmi1 acts together with BLM/Sgs1 and TopoIIIα/Top3 to maintain genome stability by limiting crossover (CO) formation in favour of NCO events, probably through the dissolution of double Holliday junction intermediates (dHJ). So far, very limited data is available on the involvement of these complexes in meiotic DNA repair. In this paper, we present the first meiotic study of a member of the BLAP75 family through characterisation of the Arabidopsis thaliana homologue. In A. thaliana blap75 mutants, meiotic recombination is initiated, and recombination progresses until the formation of bivalent-like structures, even in the absence of ZMM proteins. However, chromosome fragmentation can be detected as soon as metaphase I and is drastic at anaphase I, while no second meiotic division is observed. Using genetic and imunolocalisation studies, we showed that these defects reflect a role of A. thaliana BLAP75 in meiotic double-strand break (DSB) repair—that it acts after the invasion step mediated by RAD51 and associated proteins and that it is necessary to repair meiotic DSBs onto sister chromatids as well as onto the homologous chromosome. In conclusion, our results show for the first time that BLAP75/Rmi1 is a key protein of the meiotic homologous recombination machinery. In A. thaliana, we found that this protein is dispensable for homologous chromosome recognition and synapsis but necessary for the repair of meiotic DSBs. Furthermore, in the absence of BLAP75, bivalent formation can happen even in the absence of ZMM proteins, showing that in blap75 mutants, recombination intermediates exist that are stable enough to form bivalent structures, even when ZMM are absent.     

DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathway Choice Is Directed by Distinct MRE11 Nuclease Activities

1. Download : Download high-res image (155KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

A Test of the Double-Strand Break Repair Model for Meiotic Recombination in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

We tested predictions of the double-strand break repair (DSBR) model for meiotic recombination by examining the segregation patterns of small palindromic insertions, which frequently escape mismatch repair when in heteroduplex DNA. The palindromes flanked a well characterized DSB site at the ARG4 locus. The ``canonical'''' DSBR model, in which only 5'' ends are degraded and resolution of the four-stranded intermediate is by Holliday junction resolvase, predicts that hDNA will frequently occur on both participating chromatids in a single event. Tetrads reflecting this configuration of hDNA were rare. In addition, a class of tetrads not predicted by the canonical DSBR model was identified. This class represented events that produced hDNA in a ``trans'''' configuration, on opposite strands of the same duplex on the two sides of the DSB site. Whereas most classes of convertant tetrads had typical frequencies of associated crossovers, tetrads with trans hDNA were parental for flanking markers. Modified versions of the DSBR model, including one that uses a topoisomerase to resolve the canonical DSBR intermediate, are supported by these data.     

ZTF-8 Interacts with the 9-1-1 Complex and Is Required for DNA Damage Response and Double-Strand Break Repair in the C. elegans Germline

Germline mutations in DNA repair genes are linked to tumor progression. Furthermore, failure in either activating a DNA damage checkpoint or repairing programmed meiotic double-strand breaks (DSBs) can impair chromosome segregation. Therefore, understanding the molecular basis for DNA damage response (DDR) and DSB repair (DSBR) within the germline is highly important. Here we define ZTF-8, a previously uncharacterized protein conserved from worms to humans, as a novel factor involved in the repair of both mitotic and meiotic DSBs as well as in meiotic DNA damage checkpoint activation in the C. elegans germline. ztf-8 mutants exhibit specific sensitivity to γ-irradiation and hydroxyurea, mitotic nuclear arrest at S-phase accompanied by activation of the ATL-1 and CHK-1 DNA damage checkpoint kinases, as well as accumulation of both mitotic and meiotic recombination intermediates, indicating that ZTF-8 functions in DSBR. However, impaired meiotic DSBR progression partially fails to trigger the CEP-1/p53-dependent DNA damage checkpoint in late pachytene, also supporting a role for ZTF-8 in meiotic DDR. ZTF-8 partially co-localizes with the 9-1-1 DDR complex and interacts with MRT-2/Rad1, a component of this complex. The human RHINO protein rescues the phenotypes observed in ztf-8 mutants, suggesting functional conservation across species. We propose that ZTF-8 is involved in promoting repair at stalled replication forks and meiotic DSBs by transducing DNA damage checkpoint signaling via the 9-1-1 pathway. Our findings define a conserved function for ZTF-8/RHINO in promoting genomic stability in the germline.     

Genetic Requirements for the Single-Strand Annealing Pathway of Double-Strand Break Repair in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

HO endonuclease-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) within a direct duplication of Escherichia coli lacZ genes are repaired either by gene conversion or by single-strand annealing (SSA), with >80% being SSA. Previously it was demonstrated that the RAD52 gene is required for DSB-induced SSA. In the present study, the effects of other genes belonging to the RAD52 epistasis group were analyzed. We show that RAD51, RAD54, RAD55, and RAD57 genes are not required for SSA irrespective of whether recombination occurred in plasmid or chromosomal DNA. In both plasmid and chromosomal constructs with homologous sequences in direct orientation, the proportion of SSA events over gene conversion was significantly elevated in the mutant strains. However, gene conversion was not affected when the two lacZ sequences were in inverted orientation. These results suggest that there is a competition between SSA and gene conversion processes that favors SSA in the absence of RAD51, RAD54, RAD55 and RAD57. Mutations in RAD50 and XRS2 genes do not prevent the completion, but markedly retard the kinetics, of DSB repair by both mechanisms in the lacZ direct repeat plasmid, a result resembling the effects of these genes during mating-type (MAT) switching.     

The Exonuclease Homolog OsRAD1 Promotes Accurate Meiotic Double-Strand Break Repair by Suppressing Nonhomologous End Joining

During meiosis, programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs) are generated to initiate homologous recombination, which is crucial for faithful chromosome segregation. In yeast, Radiation sensitive1 (RAD1) acts together with Radiation sensitive9 (RAD9) and Hydroxyurea sensitive1 (HUS1) to facilitate meiotic recombination via cell-cycle checkpoint control. However, little is known about the meiotic functions of these proteins in higher eukaryotes. Here, we characterized a RAD1 homolog in rice (Oryza sativa) and obtained evidence that O. sativa RAD1 (OsRAD1) is important for meiotic DSB repair. Loss of OsRAD1 led to abnormal chromosome association and fragmentation upon completion of homologous pairing and synapsis. These aberrant chromosome associations were independent of OsDMC1. We found that classical nonhomologous end-joining mediated by Ku70 accounted for most of the ectopic associations in Osrad1. In addition, OsRAD1 interacts directly with OsHUS1 and OsRAD9, suggesting that these proteins act as a complex to promote DSB repair during rice meiosis. Together, these findings suggest that the 9-1-1 complex facilitates accurate meiotic recombination by suppressing nonhomologous end-joining during meiosis in rice.Meiosis comprises two successive cell divisions after a single S phase, generating four haploid products. To ensure proper chromosome segregation at the first meiotic division, crossovers (COs) are formed between homologous chromosomes (Kleckner, 2006). CO formation requires faithful repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) introduced by the protein SPO11 (Keeney et al., 1997; Shinohara et al., 1997).Mitotic cells employ two basic strategies for DSB repair: homologous recombination (HR) and classical nonhomologous end-joining (C-NHEJ; Deriano and Roth, 2013). HR requires an undamaged template sequence for repair, while the C-NHEJ pathway involves direct ligation of the broken ends in a Ku-dependent manner. Both HR and C-NHEJ safeguard genome integrity during mitosis (Ceccaldi et al., 2016; Symington and Gautier, 2011). However, DSBs are preferentially repaired by HR during meiosis, because only this pathway generates COs. C-NHEJ competes with HR and creates de novo mutations in the gametes, indicating that this activity should be restricted during meiotic DSB repair. Previous studies have identified several factors essential for preventing C-NHEJ in meiosis (Goedecke et al., 1999; Martin et al., 2005; Adamo et al., 2010; Lemmens et al., 2013).Although the mechanism inhibiting C-NHEJ during meiosis is still elusive, regulators guaranteeing the success of the HR pathway have been extensively studied. Radiation sensitive1 (RAD1) is an evolutionarily conserved protein whose best-known function is checkpoint signaling. RAD1, a member of the ring-shaped RAD9-RAD1-HUS1 (9-1-1) complex, plays a crucial role in activating the pachytene checkpoint, a surveillance mechanism for monitoring the progression of meiotic HR in many organisms (Lydall et al., 1996; Hong and Roeder, 2002; Eichinger and Jentsch, 2010).In addition to their well-known roles in checkpoint signaling, members of 9-1-1 complex may also play a direct role in facilitating DSB repair and HR during meiosis. RAD1 is associated with both synapsed and unsynapsed chromosomes during prophase I in mouse (Freire et al., 1998). The homolog of RAD1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is Rad17, and rad17 mutant exhibits persistent Rad51 foci (Shinohara et al., 2003). Moreover, mutations in Rad17 lead to a reduced frequency of interhomolog recombination, aberrant synapsis, increased rates of ectopic recombination events, and illegitimate repair from the sister chromatids during meiosis (Grushcow et al., 1999). Recently, Rad17 was shown to be necessary for the efficient assembly of ZMM proteins (Shinohara et al., 2015). Apart from RAD1, the other partners of 9-1-1 were also shown to be involved in DSB repair. HUS1 is proved essential for meiotic DSB repair in Drosophila (Peretz et al., 2009). Moreover, Hus1 inactivation in mouse testicular germ cells results in persistent meiotic DNA damage, chromosomal defects, and germ cell depletion (Lyndaker et al., 2013). Nevertheless, little is known about the role of 9-1-1 proteins in higher plants. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutants of RAD9 show increased sensitivity to genotoxic agents and delayed general repair of mitotic DSBs (Heitzeberg et al., 2004). A recent study indicates that HUS1 is involved in DSB repair of both mitotic and meiotic cells in rice (Che et al., 2014).In this study, we showed that OsRAD1 was required for the accurate repair of DSBs in rice during meiosis. Importantly, we demonstrated that the defective meiotic DSB repair in the Osrad1 mutants could be partially suppressed by blocking the C-NHEJ pathway. We also investigated the relationship between OsRAD1 and other key recombination proteins. Together, our findings indicated that the 9-1-1 complex plays a crucial role in the meiotic DSB repair mechanism.     

Regulation of 53BP1 Protein Stability by RNF8 and RNF168 Is Important for Efficient DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

53BP1 regulates DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. In functional assays for specific DSB repair pathways, we found that 53BP1 was important in the conservative non-homologous end-joining (C-NHEJ) pathway, and this activity was dependent upon RNF8 and RNF168. We observed that 53BP1 protein was diffusely abundant in nuclei, and upon ionizing radiation, 53BP1 was everywhere degraded except at DNA damage sites. Depletion of RNF8 or RNF168 blocked the degradation of the diffusely localized nuclear 53BP1, and ionizing radiation induced foci (IRIF) did not form. Furthermore, when 53BP1 degradation was inhibited, a subset of 53BP1 was bound to DNA damage sites but bulk, unbound 53BP1 remained in the nucleoplasm, and localization of its downstream effector RIF1 at DSBs was abolished. Our data suggest a novel mechanism for responding to DSB that upon ionizing radiation, 53BP1 was divided into two populations, ensuring functional DSB repair: damage site-bound 53BP1 whose binding signal is known to be generated by RNF8 and RNF168; and unbound bulk 53BP1 whose ensuing degradation is regulated by RNF8 and RNF168.     

Dmc1 Functions in a Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Meiotic Pathway That Is Largely Independent of the Rad51 Pathway

Meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires two similar recA-like proteins, Dmc1p and Rad51p. A screen for dominant meiotic mutants provided DMC1-G126D, a dominant allele mutated in the conserved ATP-binding site (specifically, the A-loop motif) that confers a null phenotype. A recessive null allele, dmc1-K69E, was isolated as an intragenic suppressor of DMC1-G126D. Dmc1-K69Ep, unlike Dmc1p, does not interact homotypically in a two-hybrid assay, although it does interact with other fusion proteins identified by two-hybrid screen with Dmc1p. Dmc1p, unlike Rad51p, does not interact in the two-hybrid assay with Rad52p or Rad54p. However, Dmc1p does interact with Tid1p, a Rad54p homologue, with Tid4p, a Rad16p homologue, and with other fusion proteins that do not interact with Rad51p, suggesting that Dmc1p and Rad51p function in separate, though possibly overlapping, recombinational repair complexes. Epistasis analysis suggests that DMC1 and RAD51 function in separate pathways responsible for meiotic recombination. Taken together, our results are consistent with a requirement for DMC1 for meiosis-specific entry of DNA double-strand break ends into chromatin. Interestingly, the pattern on CHEF gels of chromosome fragments that result from meiotic DNA double-strand break formation is different in DMC1 mutant strains from that seen in rad50S strains.     

Meiotic Recombination in Arabidopsis Is Catalysed by DMC1, with RAD51 Playing a Supporting Role

Recombination establishes the chiasmata that physically link pairs of homologous chromosomes in meiosis, ensuring their balanced segregation at the first meiotic division and generating genetic variation. The visible manifestation of genetic crossing-overs, chiasmata are the result of an intricate and tightly regulated process involving induction of DNA double-strand breaks and their repair through invasion of a homologous template DNA duplex, catalysed by RAD51 and DMC1 in most eukaryotes. We describe here a RAD51-GFP fusion protein that retains the ability to assemble at DNA breaks but has lost its DNA break repair capacity. This protein fully complements the meiotic chromosomal fragmentation and sterility of Arabidopsis rad51, but not rad51 dmc1 mutants. Even though DMC1 is the only active meiotic strand transfer protein in the absence of RAD51 catalytic activity, no effect on genetic map distance was observed in complemented rad51 plants. The presence of inactive RAD51 nucleofilaments is thus able to fully support meiotic DSB repair and normal levels of crossing-over by DMC1. Our data demonstrate that RAD51 plays a supporting role for DMC1 in meiotic recombination in the flowering plant, Arabidopsis.     

Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 5 Is Required for the Efficient Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks

During the DNA damage response (DDR), ubiquitination plays an important role in the recruitment and regulation of repair proteins. However, little is known about elimination of the ubiquitination signal after repair is completed. Here we show that the ubiquitin-specific protease 5 (USP5), a deubiquitinating enzyme, is involved in the elimination of the ubiquitin signal from damaged sites and is required for efficient DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Depletion of USP5 sensitizes cells to DNA damaging agents, produces DSBs, causes delayed disappearance of γH2AX foci after Bleocin treatment, and influences DSB repair efficiency in the homologous recombination pathway but not in the non-homologous end joining pathway. USP5 co-localizes to DSBs induced by laser micro-irradiation in a RAD18-dependent manner. Importantly, polyubiquitin chains at sites of DNA damage remained for longer periods in USP5-depleted cells. Our results show that disassembly of polyubiquitin chains by USP5 at sites of damage is important for efficient DSB repair.     

PRDM9 Methyltransferase Activity Is Essential for Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Break Formation at Its Binding Sites

1. Download high-res image (175KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Gibberellin Is Required for Flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana under Short Days

Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana deficient in gibberellin synthesis (ga1-3 and ga1-6), and a gibberellin-insensitive mutant (gai) were compared to the wild-type (WT) Landsberg erecta line for flowering time and leaf number when grown in either short days (SD) or continuous light (CL). The ga1-3 mutant, which is severely defective in ent-kaurene synthesis because it lacks most of the GA1 gene, never flowered in SD unless treated with exogenous gibberellin. After a prolonged period of vegetative growth, this mutant eventually underwent senescence without having produced flower buds. The gai mutant and the “leaky” ga1-6 mutant did flower in SD, but took somewhat longer than WT. All the mutants flowered readily in CL, although the ga1-3 mutant showed some delay. Unlike WT and ga1-3, the gai mutant failed to respond to gibberellin treatment by accelerating flowering in SD. A cold treatment promoted flowering in the WT and gai, but failed to induce flowering in ga1-3. From these results, it appears that gibberellin normally plays a role in initiating flowering of Arabidopsis.     

Differential Requirement for SUB1 in Chromosomal and Plasmid Double-Strand DNA Break Repair

Non homologous end joining (NHEJ) is an important process that repairs double strand DNA breaks (DSBs) in eukaryotic cells. Cells defective in NHEJ are unable to join chromosomal breaks. Two different NHEJ assays are typically used to determine the efficiency of NHEJ. One requires NHEJ of linearized plasmid DNA transformed into the test organism; the other requires NHEJ of a single chromosomal break induced either by HO endonuclease or the I-SceI restriction enzyme. These two assays are generally considered equivalent and rely on the same set of NHEJ genes. PC4 is an abundant DNA binding protein that has been suggested to stimulate NHEJ. Here we tested the role of PC4''s yeast homolog SUB1 in repair of DNA double strand breaks using different assays. We found SUB1 is required for NHEJ repair of DSBs in plasmid DNA, but not in chromosomal DNA. Our results suggest that these two assays, while similar are not equivalent and that repair of plasmid DNA requires additional factor(s) that are not required for NHEJ repair of chromosomal double-strand DNA breaks. Possible roles for Sub1 proteins in NHEJ of plasmid DNA are discussed.