Heat shock produces periodic somitic disturbances in the zebrafish embryo.

Environmental influences are known to produce segmental defects in a variety of organisms. In this paper we report upon segmental aberrations produced by brief heat shocks delivered to developing zebrafish embryos. The initial defects in the segmental pattern of somitic boundaries and motoneuron axon outgrowth were usually observed five somites caudal to the somite which was forming at the time of heat shock application. Segmental defects in zebrafish embryos exposed to a single heat shock treatment can occur in a periodic pattern similar to the multiple disturbances observed to occur in chick embryos. These data are discussed with regard to models involving cell cycle synchrony or 'clock and wavefront' schemes in the process of somitogenesis.     

Ethanol treatment induces a delayed segmentation anomaly in the chick embryo

A repeatable somite anomaly is described that results from the incubation of cultured chick embryos in the presence of ethanol. The anomaly comprises a misalignment of approximately five consecutive pairs of somites such that one of each pair is displaced cranially by up to one-half a somite length. The appearance of the malformation is delayed by approximately six somite pairs after the beginning of treatment. These characteristics were shared by embryos treated at the stage of gastrulation (no somites yet present) up to embryos possessing ten pairs of somites at treatment time. The deleterious effect did not appear to result from a disruption in the mechanics of the segmentation process itself, since isolated segmental plates were able to form normal intersomitic clefts in the presence of ethanol. Similarly, there were apparently no alterations in the compaction process that occurs at the cranial end of the segmental plate, since both the contractile and adhesive components were unaffected, as judged by the distributions of actin and fibronectin. The potential mechanisms of the anomaly are discussed with reference to similar segmental defects produced by heat shock. In view of earlier results indicating that cells in the primitive streak at gastrulation are sensitive to the presence of ethanol, it is proposed that this somite anomaly is due to a disruption in the contribution of these mesoderm cells to the segmental plate.     

The contribution made by cells from a single somite to tissues within a body segment and assessment of their integration with similar cells from adjacent segments

Somites represent the first visual evidence of segmentation in the developing vertebrate embryo and it is becoming clear that this segmental pattern of the somites is used in the initial stages of development of other segmented systems such as the peripheral nervous system. However, it is not known whether the somites continue to contribute to the maintenance of the segmental pattern after the dispersal of the somitic cells. In particular, the extent to which cells from a single somite contribute to all of the tissues of a single body segment and the extent to which they mix with cells from adjacent segments during their migration is not known. In this study, we have replaced single somites in the future cervical region of 2-day-old chick embryos with equivalent, similarly staged quail somites. The chimerae were then allowed to develop for a further 6 days when they were killed. The cervical region was dissected and serially sectioned. The sections were stained with the Feulgen reaction for DNA to differentiate between the chick and quail cells. The results showed that the cells from a single somite remained as a clearly delimited group throughout their migration. Furthermore, the sclerotome, dermatome and myotome portions from the single somites could always be recognised as being separate from similar cells from other somites. The somitic cells formed all of the tissues within a body segment excluding the epidermis, notochord and neural tissue. There was very little mixing of the somitic cells between adjacent segments. The segmental pattern of the somites is therefore maintained during the migration of the somitic cells and this might be fundamental to a mechanism whereby the segmentation of structures, such as the peripheral nervous system, is also maintained during development.     

Spring forward and fall back: dynamics in formation of somite boundaries

Oscillating signaling systems mediate the progressive division of mesoderm into segmental units, termed somites. A recent study using time-lapse analysis in living chick embryos has revealed that the process of somite boundary formation relies on a carefully choreographed series of cell movements, which are both unexpected and surprisingly intricate.     

Dynamic expression of lunatic fringe suggests a link between notch signaling and an autonomous cellular oscillator driving somite segmentation

The metameric organization of the vertebrate trunk is a characteristic feature of all members of this phylum. The origin of this metamerism can be traced to the division of paraxial mesoderm into individual units, termed somites, during embryonic development. Despite the identification of somites as the first overt sign of segmentation in vertebrates well over 100 years ago, the mechanism(s) underlying somite formation remain poorly understood. Recently, however, several genes have been identified which play prominent roles in orchestrating segmentation, including the novel secreted factor lunatic fringe. To gain further insight into the mechanism by which lunatic fringe controls somite development, we have conducted a thorough analysis of lunatic fringe expression in the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm of chick embryos. Here we report that lunatic fringe is expressed predominantly in somite -II, where somite I corresponds to the most recently formed somite and somite -I corresponds to the group of cells which will form the next somite. In addition, we show that lunatic fringe is expressed in a highly dynamic manner in the chick segmental plate prior to somite formation and that lunatic fringe expression cycles autonomously with a periodicity of somite formation. Moreover, the murine ortholog of lunatic fringe undergoes a similar cycling expression pattern in the presomitic mesoderm of somite stage mouse embryos. The demonstration of a dynamic periodic expression pattern suggests that lunatic fringe may function to integrate notch signaling to a cellular oscillator controlling somite segmentation.     

A cell cycle model for somitogenesis: mathematical formulation and numerical simulation

After many years of research, the mechanisms that generate a periodic pattern of repeated elements (somites) along the length of the embryonic body axis is still one of the major unresolved problems in developmental biology. Here we present a mathematical formulation of the cell cycle model for somitogenesis proposed in Development105 (1989), 119-130. Somite precursor cells in the node are asynchronous, and therefore, as a population, generate continuously pre-somite cells which enter the segmental plate. The model makes the hypothesis that there exists a time window within the cell cycle, making up one-seventh of the cycle, which gates the pre-somite cells so that they make somites discretely, seven per cycle. We show that the model can indeed account for the spatiotemporal patterning of somite formation during normal development as well as the periodic abnormalities produced by heat shock treatment. We also relate the model to recent molecular data on the process of somite formation.     

The influence of axial structures on chick somite formation

The influence of the axial structures on somite formation was investigated by culturing, on a nutritive agar substrate, segmental plates from chick embryos having 8 to 20 pairs of somites. In the first set of experiments, segmental plate was explanted together with adjacent notochord and approximately the lateral halves of the neural tube and node region. These explants formed 18 to 20 somites within 30 hr. In a second series of experiments, the notochord and neural tube were included as before, but further regression movements in the explants were prevented by removing the node region. These explants formed only 11.9 ± 1.1 somites. Finally, explants of segmental plate that included no neural tube, notochord, or node region were made. These explants had formed 10.7 ± 1.1 somites 14 to 17 hr later. When such explants were cultured for periods longer than 17 hr, there was a marked tendency for the more posterior somites to disperse and for all of the somites to develop a peculiar “hollow” morphology. It was concluded from these results that during the period of development when chick embryos possess 8 to 20 pairs of somites, the segmental plate mesoderm (1) represents about 12 prospective somites, (2) may segment into its full complement of somites without further contact with the axial structures, but (3) requires continued intimate contact with the axial structures for normal somite morphologic differentiation and stability.     

The somitic level of origin of embryonic chick hindlimb muscles

Studies of avian chimeras made by transplanting groups of quail somites into chick embryos have consistently shown that the muscle cells of the hindlimb are derived from the adjacent somites, however, the pattern of cell distribution from individual somites to individual hindlimb muscles has not been characterized. I have mapped quail cell distribution in the chick hindlimb after single somite transplantation to determine if cells from an individual somite populate discrete limb muscle regions and if there is a spatial correspondence between a muscle's somitic level of origin and the known spinal cord position of its motoneuron pool. At stages 15-18 single chick somites or equivalent lengths of unsegmented somitic mesoderm adjacent to the prospective hindlimb region were replaced with the corresponding tissue from quail embryos. At stages 28-34, quail cell distribution was mapped within individual thigh muscles and shank muscle regions. A quail-specific antiserum and Feulgen staining were used to identify quail cells. Transplants from somite levels 26-33 each gave rise to consistent quail cell labeling in a unique subset of limb muscles. The anteroposterior positions of these subsets corresponded to that of the transplanted somitic tissue. For example, more anterior or anteromedial thigh muscles contained quail cells when more anterior somitic tissue had been transplanted. For the majority of thigh muscles studied and for shank muscle groups, there was also a clear correlation between somitic level of origin and motoneuron pool position. These data are compatible with the hypothesis that motoneurons and the muscle cells of their targets share axial position labels. The question of whether motoneurons from a specific spinal cord segment recognize and consequently innervate muscle cells derived from the same axial level during early axon outgrowth is addressed in the accompanying paper (C. Lance-Jones, 1988, Dev. Biol. 126, 408-419). Quail cell distribution was also mapped in chick embryos in which quail somites or unsegmented mesoderm had been placed 2-3 somites away from their position of origin. In all cases donor somitic tissues contributed to muscles in accord with their host position. These results indicate that muscle cell precursors within the somites are not specified to migrate to a predetermined target region.     

Cell cycle progression is required for zebrafish somite morphogenesis but not segmentation clock function

Cell division, differentiation and morphogenesis are coordinated during embryonic development, and frequently are in disarray in pathologies such as cancer. Here, we present a zebrafish mutant that ceases mitosis at the beginning of gastrulation, but that undergoes axis elongation and develops blood, muscle and a beating heart. We identify the mutation as being in early mitotic inhibitor 1 (emi1), a negative regulator of the Anaphase Promoting Complex, and use the mutant to examine the role of the cell cycle in somitogenesis. The mutant phenotype indicates that axis elongation during the segmentation period is driven substantially by cell migration. We find that the segmentation clock, which regulates somitogenesis, functions normally in the absence of cell cycle progression, and observe that mitosis is a modest source of noise for the clock. Somite morphogenesis involves the epithelialization of the somite border cells around a core of mesenchyme. As in wild-type embryos, somite boundary cells are polarized along a Fibronectin matrix in emi1(-/-). The mutants also display evidence of segment polarity. However, in the absence of a normal cell cycle, somites appear to hyper-epithelialize, as the internal mesenchymal cells exit the core of the somite after initial boundary formation. Thus, cell cycle progression is not required during the segmentation period for segmentation clock function but is necessary for the normal segmental arrangement of epithelial borders and internal mesenchymal cells.     

Cell movement in somite formation and development in the chick: Inhibition of segmentation

The contribution of active cell movement to somite formation (segmentation) and the later dispersal of the somite sclerotome was examined using cytochalasin D (CD). Stage 14–16 chick embryos were grown over liquid medium. After 8 hr in culture, control embryos had an average of six additional pairs of somites while CD (1–2 μg/ml dissolved in DMSO)-treated embryos had no new somites. DMSO alone had no effect on somitogenesis. CD-treated embryos transferred to drug-free medium recovered and segmentation resumed. Normal and CD-treated segmental plates were examined by SEM. Drug-treated segmental plate cells rounded up, consistent with the interaction of CD on contractile microfilaments. Embryos cultured 8 hr with or without CD were fractured through somite pair 20 and examined by SEM. In untreated embryos the sclerotome had dispersed and was migrating toward the notochord. CD stopped sclerotome dispersal. To test whether CD interfered with elaboration of extracellular matrix material associated with somite development, incorporation of [³H]glucosamine and Na₂³⁵SO₄ by somites and segmental plate was determined. There was no difference in total label incorporation. Molecular-weight profiles of proteoglycan obtained using controlled-pore glass-bead columns showed only small proteoglycans for both treated and control tissues. Therefore, the alteration of segmentation and somite morphogenesis by CD was not due to detectable changes in proteoglycan synthesis.     

Developmental Fate of Artificially Disordered Somite Cells after Heteroplastic Transplantation

A disordered somite pattern could be produced artificially when the segmental lateral plate of chickembryo was replaced by dissociated cells of quail segmental pate.The artificially disordered somitepattern formed at either place was used in our work as a model to analyze the mechanism of thedevelopment and differentiation of somite on chick embryo.Our conclusions include the following:1.Although the formation of somites from the dissociated segmental plate cells does not requirespecial environment,the development and differentiation of the somltes require a special environmentwhich is related to the neural tube and notochord.The effect of this special environmental factor maydecrease gradually with the increase of the distance from neural tube to lateral plate.2.The somites located on paraxial area at different distances to the axis have different fates indevelopment.3.The formation of epithelial vesicles is the property of somite cells and the epithelial vesicle is thestructural basis of somite differentiation.If and factor interferes with the differentiation of thesomite,the epithelial vesicle of the somite will be degenerated within certain period of time.4.During resegmentation of the somite,the number,size and arrangement of sclerotome in situ donot depend on the somite from which they are derived.5.Somite cells do not transdifferentiate into kidney tubule directly from their original epithelialvesicles,but are reorganized from the free cells dispersed from the disrupted somites.6.The establishment of cell commitment may involve several steps.Before commitment isestablished the of cell commitment is labile.7.The differentiation of sclerotome starts with the rupture of epithelial wall of somites and thedirection of its movement depends not only on the notochord but also on their position with respectto the neural tube and notochord.8.The disordered somite pattern doesn't influence the segmentation of dorsal root ganglia in situ,but causes the formation of the ectopic dorsal root ganglia.Key Words:Somite differentiation;Artificial disordered somite pattern;Chimeral somite;Resegmentation of sclerotome;Distribution of dorsal root ganglia     

The rostral level of origin of sympathetic neurons in the chick embryo, studied in tissue culture.

Groups of three consecutive somites from the first to the eleventh somite from chick embryos of stages 17-18 were grown in tissue culture for seven days. Sympathetic neurons, identified both by phase contrast microscopy and FIF histochemistry, occurred only in cultures which included the sixth, or more caudal, somites. If it is assumed that sympathetic precursor cells (neural crest cells) have not undergone a caudal shift prior to stages 17-18, and taking into account the loss of one or two rostral somites, then the anterior sympathetic ganglia are derived from neural crest caudal to the sixth or seventh somite. Thus, the vagal zone (level with somites 1-7) contributes little to the sympathetic nervous system.     

Perturbation of beta 1 integrin-mediated adhesions results in altered somite cell shape and behavior.

Cell contact and adhesion between somites and the axial extracellular matrix (ECM) is likely to play a fundamental role in vertebrate development. In a preliminary report we showed that injection of the monoclonal antibody CSAT, which recognizes the avian beta 1 integrins, causes a lateral separation of both somites and segmental plate tissue from the embryonic axis (Drake and Little, 1991). In this study we addressed the cell biological response to CSAT injection, particularly the cell-ECM interactions involved in maintaining normal somite-axial relationships. A total of 150 stage 7-10 quail embryos have been injected with CSAT and then cultured for varying periods (1-30 hr). CSAT caused somitic cells to behave abnormally. Changes include, rounding-up, extensive blebbing, and formation of retraction fibers. A majority of separated somites were able to assume normal axial position with further time culture. Whether a somite subsequently aligned at the axis was dependent on the amount of CSAT injected and the postinjection culture period. Embryos in which somites remained separated from the axis after relatively long culture intervals (18-24 hr) displayed abnormal sclerotomal cell migrations. In no case did control injected embryos exhibit cellular alterations. Similarly, the injection of RGD-containing peptides had no detectable effect on somitogenesis or somite/segmental plate adhesion to the axis. On the basis of these data, we conclude that beta 1 integrins are necessary for normal somitic cell adhesions to the axis, but not somite segmentation and differentiation.     

An evaluation of myelomeres and segmentation of the chick embryo spinal cord.

We have investigated whether the neuromeres of the developing chick spinal cord (myelomeres) are manifestations of intrinsic segmentation of the CNS by studying the patterns of cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation. Treatment of 2-day embryos with colchicine does produce exaggerated myelomeres, in confirmation of K?llén (Z. Anat. Entwickl.-Gesch. 123, 309-319, 1962). However, this does not imply that myelomeres are segmental proliferation centres: the undulations caused by colchicine are irregular alongside the unsegmented mesoderm, and another mitotic inhibitor, bromodeoxyuridine, has no such effects. In contrast to lower vertebrate embryos, there is no evidence for segmental groups of primary motor neurons in the chick: the earliest motor neurons express cholinesterase, and project their axons into the adjacent sclerotome, at random positions in relation to the somite boundaries. The population of motor neurons projecting HRP-labelled axons into a single somite lies out of phase with both myelomere and somite, and is placed symmetrically about the anterior half-sclerotome. The earliest intrinsic spinal cord neurons, as stained with zinc iodide-osmium tetroxide or anti-68 x Mr neurofilament antibody, show no segmental patterns of differentiation. We conclude that, in contrast to the rhombomeres of the developing hindbrain, myelomeres are not matched by segmental groupings of differentiating nerve cells, and result from mechanical moulding of the neuroepithelium by the neighbouring somites.     

Wnt 6 regulates the epithelialisation process of the segmental plate mesoderm leading to somite formation

In higher vertebrates, the paraxial mesoderm undergoes a mesenchymal to epithelial transformation to form segmentally organised structures called somites. Experiments have shown that signals originating from the ectoderm overlying the somites or from midline structures are required for the formation of the somites, but their identity has yet to be determined. Wnt6 is a good candidate as a somite epithelialisation factor from the ectoderm since it is expressed in this tissue. In this study, we show that injection of Wnt6-producing cells beneath the ectoderm at the level of the segmental plate or lateral to the segmental plate leads to the formation of numerous small epithelial somites. Ectopic expression of Wnt6 leads to sustained expression of markers associated with the epithelial somites and reduced or delayed expression of markers associated with mesenchymally organised somitic tissue. More importantly, we show that Wnt6-producing cells are able to rescue somite formation after ectoderm ablation. Furthermore, injection of Wnt6-producing cells following the isolation of the neural tube/notochord from the segmental plate was able to rescue somite formation at both the structural (epithelialisation) and molecular level, as determined by the expression of marker genes like Paraxis or Pax-3. We show that Wnts are indeed responsible for the epithelialisation of somites by applying Wnt antagonists, which result in the segmental plate being unable to form somites. These results show that Wnt6, the only known member of this family to be localised to the chick paraxial ectoderm, is able to regulate the development of epithelial somites and that cellular organisation is pivotal in the execution of the differentiation programmes. We propose a model in which the localisation of Wnt6 and its antagonists regulates the process of epithelialisation in the paraxial mesoderm.     

The allocation of cells in the presomitic mesoderm during somite segmentation in the mouse embryo

Orthotopic grafts of wheat germ agglutinin-colloidal gold conjugate (WGA-gold) labelled cells were used to demonstrate differences in the segmental fate of cells in the presomitic mesoderm of the early-somite-stage mouse embryos developing in vitro. Labelled cells in the anterior region of the presomitic mesoderm colonized the first three somites formed after grafting, while those grafted to the middle region of this tissue were found mostly in the 4th-7th newly formed somites. Labelled cells grafted to the posterior region were incorporated into somites whose somitomeres were not yet present in the presomitic mesoderm at the time of grafting. There was therefore an apparent posterior displacement of the grafted cells in the presomitic mesoderm. Colonization of somites by WGA-gold labelled cells was usually limited to two to three consecutive somites in the chimaera. The distribution of cells derived from a single graft to two somites was most likely due to the segregation of the labelled population when cells were allocated to adjacent meristic units during somite formation. Further spreading of the labelled cells to several somites in some cases was probably the result of a more extensive mixing of mesodermal cells among the somitomeres prior to somite segmentation.     

Mesodermal metamerism in the teleost, Oryzias latipes (the medaka)

Previous studies of the metameric pattern in mesodermal tissues of chick, mouse, turtle, and amphibian embryos have indicated that segmental characteristics exist along the entire length of the embryo. This paper describes this phenomenon in a fish embryo, for some differences in the cranial segmental plan exist between the anamniote and the amniote embryos hitherto studied. Embryos of the cyprinodont, Oryzias latipes, were fixed at various times, the examined by means of stereo scanning electron microscopy. As in other vertebrate embryos, the first indication of mesodermal metamerism in this fish embryo is the occurrence of somitomeres, which are orderly, tandemly arranged units of uncondensed mesenchymal cells in the paraxial mesoderm. As many as ten somitomeres can be observed caudal to the last formed somite to the elongating tail region. In addition, 7 somitomeres are present rostral to the first definitive somite, which is segment number eight. As in other vertebrate embryos examined, somitomeres in Oryzias embryos are circular, bilaminar arrays of paraxial mesoderm that form before any indications of segmentation can be seen with the light microscope. In the trunk region these mesodermal units condense to give rise to definitive somites, but in the head they eventually disperse. Despite a fundamentally different mode of gastrulation and a relatively small number of cells in the newly formed somitomeres, cranial segmentation in Oryzias embryos was found to be more similar in number to the metameric pattern of the embryos of the bird, reptile, and mammal than to the situation found in the two amphibians studied thus far.     

Researches on the formation of axial organs in the chick embryo. XI. Experimental investigations into the role of Hensen's node in somitogenesis

In order to obtain new data with respect to the role of the node area in somitogenesis and to its "individuality" and real regression, three experimental models were applied to 1-7 somite chick embryo 1) UV irradiation of the node area (in vitro); 2) subnodal transsection (in vitro and in ovo); 3) combination of the two interventions. The main results obtained were as follows: The UV irradiation of the node area in chick embryos of early somite stage (1-7 somites) prevents, by necrotizing the cell population of the irradiated zone, the further regression of the node. This result attests the existence of a real, distinct, node cell population and the real character of regression movement. The subnodal transsection of similar embryos of about 0.1-0.2 mm caudal of the node leads (as observed also by several other authors) to the development of a "tail", projecting into the hole formed after the intervention. The "tail" contains axial organs and results from an "autonomous" regression of the node area. The previous irradiation of the node area prevents the shaping of the "tail". In both experimental models, segmentation and somite differentiation is possible caudal of the stopped node area (with the development of median somite blocks) and on the edges of the hole, respectively. Thus the node seems not to be an absolute contributor--by its regression--to the determination (to the second morphogenetic "wave") of somitogenesis (Cooke and Zeeman, 1976; Bellairs, 1980). The arrest of the node area regression does not influence (during the developmental stages studied) the rate of somitogenesis in the anterior part of the segmental plate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Evidence for resegmentation in the formation of the vertebral column using the novel approach of retroviral-mediated gene transfer

We have examined the somitic cell contribution to the vertebral column of the chick by genetic labeling of sclerotomal cells in early development. Single somites of embryonic Day 2 embryos were filled with retroviral particles containing the lacZ transducing vector BAG. After a further 14 or 17 days of incubation the embryos were fixed and the vertebral column was sectioned and stained histochemically for the lacZ gene product beta-galactosidase. Cells staining for the enzyme were found exclusively on the injected side of two vertebral segments; the staining was largely restricted, however, to the caudal half of the more rostral segment and the rostral half of the next more caudal segment. No embryos were observed with labeling in less than two vertebral segments. Moreover, labeled cells were not uniformly distributed within the labeled region of each vertebra; the neural arch, for example, usually contained a higher proportion of labeled cells than did the centrum. These observations support the concept of resegmentation, whereby a vertebra forms from sclerotomal cells derived from two consecutive somites resulting in a vertebral column shifted by one half segment with respect to the segmented boundaries of the somites. The quantitative distribution of labeled cells in the vertebrae also suggests that sclerotomal cells populate the region of a future vertebral segment in an orderly fashion dependent on when the cells migrate from the somite.     

Do Peanut Agglutinin Receptors on Somites Control the Behavior of Neural Cells?

Peanut agglutinin (PNA) receptors are expressed in the caudal halves of sclerotomes in chick embryos after 3 days of incubation (stages 19–20 of Hamburger & Hamilton). The neural crest cells forming dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and motor nerves appear to avoid PNA positive regions and concentrate into rostral halves of sclerotomes. To investigate the role of PNA receptors in gangliogenesis and nerve growth, we examined PNA binding ability in quail sclerotomes and in chick-quail chimeric embryos made by transplanting quail somites to chick embryos, comparing the development of DRG, motor nerves and sclerotomes. PNA did not bind to any part of the somites of 4.5-day quail embryos, although dorsal root ganglia and motor nerves appeared only in the rostral halves of sclerotomes as in chick embryos. Moreover, in spite of no PNA binding ability of the transplanted quail somite in 4.5-day chick-quail chimeric embryos, DRG and motor nerves derived from chick tissues appeared only in the rostral halves of the sclerotomes derived from these somites. Thus, both quail and chick neural crest cells and motor nerves recognized the difference between the rostral and caudal halves of sclerotomes of quail embryos in the absence of PNA binding ability, indicating that PNA binding site on somite cells does not support the selective neural crest migration and nerve growth.