中国栽培稻遗传多样性中心和起源研究

本研究对中国栽培稻6个地理分布群的700份古老地方栽培品种进行9个多态性等位酶基因位点的遗传多样性分析.结果表明籼稻和粳稻的平均基因多样性均以云南最大,淮河上游次之,黄河以北最小.中国栽培稻有3个遗传多样性中心:云南,长江中游-淮河上游,华南.长江中游-淮河上游可能是中国栽培稻的起源中心.结合考古学资料及前人的工作,认为云南不是中国栽培稻的起源中心,而可能是中国起源中心衍生的一个次生中心并受到南亚中心的强烈影响.     

PNAS：大规模基因重测序确认亚洲栽培稻起源于中国

美国研究人员在一项通过大规模基因重测序分析稻米进化史的研究中确认,亚洲栽培稻起源于中国,最早可能8000多年前就出现在中国长江流域。亚洲栽培稻是世界上最古老的农作物物种之一。此前曾有研究认为,亚洲栽培稻有两个起源地,印度和中国。但5月2日刊登在美国《国家科学院院刊》（PNAS）一项新研究说：”分子学证据表明（亚洲）栽培稻只有单一起源……最早出现在中国长江流域。”亚洲栽培稻具有籼稻和粳稻两个主要亚种,其起源相应也出现两种理论,其中一种为单一起源理论,即籼稻和粳稻均由野生稻栽培而来;     

水稻染色体组及其关系

水稻 (Oryzasativa)是世界第一大粮食作物 ,分布极其广泛 ,由于生态环境的复杂性和所处地理环境的影响 ,水稻在漫长的进化过程中 ,形成了极其丰富的遗传多样性 ,染色体组型和数目复杂多样 ,成为研究稻种起源、演化和分化必不可少的材料。1　染色体组型种类水稻属禾本科 (Poaceae Gramineae) ,禾亚科 (A-grost idoideae)稻属 (Oryza)植物。稻属植物中约有 2 2个种 ,其中栽培种 2个 ,野生种约 2 0个。 15种野生水稻染色体组型已确定 ,其余种类包括我国的疣粒野生稻(O.meyeriana Baill)的染色体组型尚待进一步研究。已发现的染色体分 6个组 …     

2012年第11期《遗传》封面说明

作物的驯化是人类从开始种植和储存的野生作物中选择优良性状,使之形态特征适应于农业生产方向进化的过程,因此,大部分种子作物驯化后在落粒性、种子休眠和植株形态等方面都出现了相似的变化。水稻是研究谷类作物驯化的良好模式生物。稻属包含2种栽培稻,分别为亚洲栽培稻(Oryza sativa L.)和非洲栽培稻(O. glaberrima Steud.),其中亚洲栽培稻遍布全世界,包含两个主要亚种,粳稻亚种(O. sativa L. ssp. japonica)和籼稻亚种(O. sativa L. ssp. indica)。稻属丰富的近缘种和广泛的地域分布非常有利于研究确定现代栽培稻的驯化地域。此外,水稻基因组较小、具高质量精细图谱,加上功能基因研究上的进展,也为深入开展水稻驯化进程研究奠定了基础。详见本期第XX-XX页区树俊,汪鸿儒,储成才“亚洲栽培稻主要驯化性状研究进展”,对水稻关键驯化性状研究进行的比较全面的综述。封面图中央是选取23株AA基因组的亚洲栽培稻及其近缘野生稻,利用水稻驯化过程中受到选择的控制稻壳颜色基因Bh4上下游各50 kb中的SNP位点所构建的进化树;图外从左下至右下沿顺时针方向,反映的是水稻驯化过程中稻壳颜色、谷粒形状、穗型的变化趋势。 区树俊,汪鸿儒,储成才（绘图：区树俊）     

壳斗演化的假说及分子系统学和化石证据

壳斗作为壳斗科Fagaceae的重要特征, 其起源、演化和多样性形成长期以来为系统学家们所关注, 有众多的观点和假说。本文在综合这些假说的基础上, 结合分子系统学和大化石证据, 讨论了壳斗演化的规律。研究结果支持壳斗具枝性性质, 来源于二歧聚伞花序最外侧小枝的假说。在比较3个壳斗演化模型的基础上, 根据4种分子系统关系的一致性重建了壳斗的演化历史: 壳斗是单系起源; 水青冈属的2果4裂瓣壳斗是最早分化的壳斗类型, 三棱栎型壳斗是较晚分化的类型; 并支持具有内裂瓣的金鳞果类型壳斗可能与其他横切面为圆形的壳斗有较近的共同祖先。这一结果也得到了多个大化石证据的支持。壳斗科多个分子系统关系的一致性和壳斗化石证据共同证实了壳斗演化的规律是从开裂向裂瓣融合、逐步简化、多向发展; 支持开裂壳斗、坚果三角形、较小、具棱或狭翅是祖征, 融合壳斗、坚果圆形、较大、不具棱是衍征。这些结果为进一步探索壳斗科的演化历史和系统发育提供了新的证据。     

水稻驯化与长江文明

水稻(即亚洲栽培稻Oryza sativa)是世界上最重要的粮食作物之一, 全球有超过半数以上人口以稻米为食。关于水稻是何时、何地、在什么环境下开始驯化等问题一直是学术界关注的热点。得益于分析技术的进步, 近年来考古学和遗传学研究在水稻驯化起源问题上取得了重要进展。本文简要综述了有关长江流域的水稻驯化起源的遗传学和考古学的研究进展, 并讨论了水稻驯化与稻作文化及长江文明的关系。遗传学研究结果认为水稻(粳稻)最早起源于中国长江流域及以南地区(珠江流域), 考古学证据则表明水稻最先于10,000-8,000 BP在中国长江流域被驯化, 水稻驯化和稻作农业的发展催生了长江文明。这些进展促进了我们对水稻驯化、稻作文化和长江文明的认识, 对长江流域重要植物资源的保护也有启示意义。     

野生稻遗传基础研究的进展

稻属约22种,其中野生稻约有20个种,它是天然的基因库,保存有栽培稻没有或已消失了的遗传基因,并具有特殊优良农艺性状,如抗病性、抗虫性、抗逆性、雄性不育性等。因此,人们开展稻属种间杂交将野生稻优质、抗性基因导人栽培稻内,育成高产、高抗、优异品质的新品种。野生稻研究不仅对水稻良种的培育及生产的发展起着重大的作用,而且为品种的起源、演变及分化的理论研究提供依据,具有重大的科学意义。对野生稻的考察、搜集和研究,历来受到世界各国水稻工作者的重视,随着水稻育种工作的进展,野生稻资源的利用越来越引起国内外的重视…     

水与稻作农耕技术的发展

正稻米是目前全球约50%以上人口的碳水化合物摄取源,而生产稻米的农作物就是稻。稻有两种,一种是亚洲栽培稻,另一种是非洲栽培稻。非洲栽培稻也叫光壳稻,主要在非洲西部种植,世界其他地区很少栽培;而亚洲栽培稻是世界上生产稻米的主要农作物,几乎在世界各地都有生产,但主要还是集中在亚洲地区。亚洲栽培稻又可分为水稻和陆稻,陆稻也叫旱稻。但是不管生产面积还是产量,占主导地位的是水稻,所以习惯上我们就把亚洲栽培稻称之为"水稻"。     

基于线粒体基因片段核苷酸多态性的亚洲栽培稻起源进化研究

亚洲栽培稻的祖先是普通野生稻,已成为世界公认的观点,然而亚洲栽培稻的2个亚种:粳稻和籼稻是一次起源还是二次起源仍存在很大争议,其起源地是国内还是国外依然是国际学者间争论的焦点。本文通过对184份亚洲栽培稻和203份普通野生稻3段基因序列cox3、cox1、orf 224和2段基因间序列ssv-39/178、rps2-trnfM的多样性研究,验证了以下观点:1)粳稻起源于中国,籼稻起源于中国和国外;2)亚洲栽培稻的起源为二次起源,即普通野生稻存在偏籼和偏粳2种类型,亚洲栽培稻的2个亚种籼稻和粳稻在进化过程中分别由偏籼型的普通野生稻和偏粳型的普通野生稻进化而来。     

蜱类的起源和演化

蜱类的起源和演化早期主要是通过以形态学和表型特征为依据构建的系统发生树进行推测。到20世纪90年代,通过形态学和分子生物学数据结合在一起的全证据方法进行系统发生分析,并结合生态学、比较寄生虫学、动物地理学、古生物学等方面的资料,对蜱类的起源和演化进行研究。文章综述有关蜱类起源和演化的3个代表性假说,并从蜱类起源和演化的时间、地点、原始宿主、华彩、生活史、寄生状态及蜱类区系演化等方面进行介绍。     

长江流域农作物起源及其与生物多样性特征的关联

长江流域的农耕文明是中华文明的重要组成部分。作为世界著名的农作物起源中心之一, 长江流域拥有丰富的生物多样性, 孕育了大量的栽培植物。本文梳理了起源于长江流域的农作物的资料以及新石器时代文化遗址的植物遗存信息; 结合对长江流域的自然环境特征与全新世以来植被变化的总结, 尝试厘清长江流域对植物资源利用的动态变化, 探讨本地栽培植物与生物多样性的关联。结果表明长江流域农耕文明以稻作为最主要的生产方式, 驯化了大量果树与水生蔬菜, 反映出对本地亚热带常绿阔叶林与湿地的依赖与适应。与其他流域相比, 长江流域具有相对优越的生态要素配置, 其驯化作物类型表现出典型的亚热带湿润森林植被区特征。研究长江流域农作物驯化相关的自然与人类因素, 有助于我们更好地把握长江流域农耕文明的起源。本文不但可为长江流域植物遗传资源的保护与开发提供参考, 而且对于推进长江流域的生态文明建设和可持续发展具有指导作用。     

Antiquity of the earliest cultivated rice in central China and its implications

Until now, most of the early rice remains in China were found in the middle to lower reaches of the Yangtze River drainage. Recently, rice remains earlier than 8000 B.P. were found from Jiahu site (8942-7801 B.P.) in Wuyang County of Henan Province, central China. This is the earliest cultivated rice found at this latitude (33°37’N), which is far outside the current distribution of wild rice species. The discovery is of great implications. It suggests that central China may be one of the centers of early rice domestication.     

栽培茶树的驯化起源与传播

茶作为世界上最重要的饮品之一, 其栽培类型的驯化起源一直是人们关注的热点。本文总结了近年相关研究的进展, 讨论了存在的问题, 并对未来的研究方向提出建议。长江流域及以南地区分布有众多栽培茶树的野生近缘种, 特别集中于云南、贵州、广西等地; 一方面南方各族语言中“茶”发音的相似, 暗示了茶知识起源的单一性, 最可能起源于古代的巴蜀或云南, 另一方面遗传分析揭示栽培的茶存在多个起源中心, 即使Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze的几个栽培变种也可能起源于不同的地区; 文献记载, 茶的栽培中心曾经从西向东再向南迁移, 遗传多样性的变化也揭示了这一可能性, 但考古发现却提示最早的栽培茶可能出现在长江流域的最东部。我们推测在茶知识及栽培品种的传播过程中, 各地野生近缘植物的基因渗入栽培类型中, 或各地居民直接用当地野生茶培育出新的栽培茶类型, 从而导致遗传上的复杂性和语言上的一致性并存。茶树的祖先类型、起源地点、起源时间以及栽培品种的演变历程都还需要更为明确的证据, 未来应该以整个茶组植物为对象, 将茶文化、群体遗传学、谱系地理、人类学、气候变化、考古等多学科研究进行整合分析。     

Sequence polymorphisms in wild,weedy, and cultivated rice suggest seed‐shattering locus sh4 played a minor role in Asian rice domestication

The predominant view regarding Asian rice domestication is that the initial origin of nonshattering involved a single gene of large effect, specifically, the sh4 locus via the evolutionary replacement of a dominant allele for shattering with a recessive allele for reduced shattering. Data have accumulated to challenge this hypothesis. Specifically, a few studies have reported occasional seed‐shattering plants from populations of the wild progenitor of cultivated rice (Oryza rufipogon complex) being homozygous for the putative “nonshattering” sh4 alleles. We tested the sh4 hypothesis for the domestication of cultivated rice by obtaining genotypes and phenotypes for a diverse set of samples of wild, weedy, and cultivated rice accessions. The cultivars were fixed for the putative “nonshattering” allele and nonshattering phenotype, but wild rice accessions are highly polymorphic for the putative “nonshattering” allele (frequency ~26%) with shattering phenotype. All weedy rice accessions are the “nonshattering” genotype at the sh4 locus but with shattering phenotype. These data challenge the widely accepted hypothesis that a single nucleotide mutation (“G”/“T”) of the sh4 locus is the major driving force for rice domestication. Instead, we hypothesize that unidentified shattering loci are responsible for the initial domestication of cultivated rice through reduced seed shattering.     

长江流域野生猕猴桃遗传资源的潜在价值、现状分析与保护策略

长江流域是猕猴桃属(Actinidia)植物起源和演化的关键分布区, 富集了全世界重要的猕猴桃属野生物种资源和中华-美味猕猴桃物种复合体(Actinidia chinensis-A. deliciosa species complex)的种群遗传资源。作为水果作物, 猕猴桃在100多年前从长江流域经上海到新西兰, 通过栽培、驯化, 逐渐发展成新兴果树产业。目前, 猕猴桃植物的研究已在二倍体“红阳”中华猕猴桃(Actinidia chinensis cv. Hongyang)的基因组测序、种间关系的重测序分析和基础的分子系统发育、种群遗传结构等方面取得长足进步, 但基于最新研究成果的基本资源评价还相当匮乏, 对猕猴桃野生资源的保护与可持续利用亟待加强。本文回顾了栽培猕猴桃的驯化简史与猕猴桃属植物系统分类的研究进展, 通过与其他流域的比较, 对长江流域野生猕猴桃资源的潜在价值和现状进行分析, 阐述了该流域猕猴桃属植物的分布特点和受威胁的状况, 并针对目前存在的问题提出建立长效的保护机制、加强遗传资源的基础科研调查和系统评价, 以及健全种质资源保存规范和促进可持续利用等相应保护的策略。     

Domestication of the neotropical tree Chrysophyllum cainito from a geographically limited yet genetically diverse gene pool in Panama

Species in the early stages of domestication, in which wild and cultivated forms co‐occur, provide important opportunities to develop and test hypotheses about the origins of crop species. Chrysophyllum cainito (Sapotaceae), the star apple or caimito, is a semidomesticated tree widely cultivated for its edible fruits; it is known to be native to the neotropics, but its precise geographic origins have not been firmly established. Here, we report results of microsatellite marker analyses supporting the hypothesis that the center of domestication for caimito was the Isthmus of Panama, a region in which few crop species are believed to have originated, despite its importance as a crossroads for the dispersal of domesticated plants between North and South America. Our data suggest that caimito was domesticated in a geographically restricted area while incorporating a diverse gene pool. These results refute the generally accepted Antillean origin of caimito, as well as alternative hypotheses that the species was domesticated independently in the two areas or over a broad geographic range including both. Human‐mediated dispersal from Panama to the north and east was accompanied by strong reductions in both genotypic and phenotypic diversity. Within Panama, cultivated and wild trees show little neutral genetic divergence, in contrast to striking phenotypic differentiation in fruit and seed traits. In addition to providing a rare example of data that support the hypothesis of a narrow geographic origin on the Isthmus of Panama for a now widespread cultivated plant species, this study is one of the first investigations of the origins of an edible species of the large pantropical family Sapotaceae.     

Origin of Oryza sativa in China Inferred by Nucleotide Polymorphisms of Organelle DNA

China is rich of germplasm resources of common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) and Asian cultivated rice (O. sativa L.) which consists of two subspecies, indica and japonica. Previous studies have shown that China is one of the domestication centers of O. sativa. However, the geographic origin and the domestication times of O. sativa in China are still under debate. To settle these disputes, six chloroplast loci and four mitochondrial loci were selected to examine the relationships between 50 accessions of Asian cultivated rice and 119 accessions of common wild rice from China based on DNA sequence analysis in the present study. The results indicated that Southern China is the genetic diversity center of O. rufipogon and it might be the primary domestication region of O. sativa. Molecular dating suggested that the two subspecies had diverged 0.1 million years ago, much earlier than the beginning of rice domestication. Genetic differentiations and phylogeography analyses indicated that indica was domesticated from tropical O. rufipogon while japonica was domesticated from O. rufipogon which located in higher latitude. These results provided molecular evidences for the hypotheses of (i) Southern China is the origin center of O. sativa in China and (ii) the two subspecies of O. sativa were domesticated multiple times.     

The Puzzle of Rice Domestication

The origin of cultivated rice has puzzled plant biologists for decades. This is due, at least in part, to the complex evolutionary dynamics in rice cultivars and wild progenitors, particularly rapid adaptive differentiation and continuous gene flow within and between cultivated and wild rice. The long-standing controversy over single versus multiple and annual versus perennial origins of cultivated rice has been brought into shaper focus with the rapid accumulation of genetic and phylogenetic data. Molecular phylogenetic analyses revealed ancient genomic differentiation between rice cultivars, suggesting that they were domesticated from divergent wild populations. However, the recently cloned domestication gene sh4, responsible for the reduction of grain shattering from wild to cultivated rice, seems to have originated only once. Herein, we propose two models to reconcile apparently conflicting evidence regarding rice domestication. The snowoballing model considers a single origin of cultivated rice. In this model, a core of critical domestication alleles was fixed in the founding cultivar and then acted to increase the genetic diversity of cultivars through hybridization with wild populations. The combination model considers multiple origins of cultivated rice. In this model, Initial cultivars were domesticated from divergent wild populations and fixed different sets of domestication alleles. Subsequent crosses among these semi-domesticated cultivars resulted in the fixation of a similar set of critical domestication alleles in the contemporary cultivars. In both models, introgression has played an important role in rice domestication. Recent and future introgression of beneficial genes from the wild gene pool through conventional and molecular breeding programs can be viewed as the continuation of domestication.