Identification and assignment of base pairs in three helical stems of Torulopsis utilis ribosomal 5S RNA and its RNase T1 and RNase T2 cleaved fragments via 500-MHz proton homonuclear overhauser enhancements

Imino proton resonances in the downfield region (10-14 ppm) of the 500-MHz 1H NMR spectrum of Torulopsis utilis 5S RNA are identified (A X U, G X C, or G X U) and assigned to base pairs in helices I, IV, and V via analysis of homonuclear Overhauser enhancements (NOE) from intact T. utilis 5S RNA, its RNase T1 and RNase T2 digested fragments, and a second yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) 5S RNA whose nucleotide sequence differs at only six residues from that of T. utilis 5S RNA. The near-identical chemical shifts and NOE behavior of most of the common peaks from these four RNAs strongly suggest that helices I, IV, and V retain the same conformation after RNase digestion and that both T. utilis and S. cerevisiae 5S RNAs share a common secondary and tertiary structure. Of the four G X U base pairs identified in the intact 5S RNA, two are assigned to the terminal stem (helix I) and the other two to helices IV and V. Seven of the nine base pairs of the terminal stem have been assigned. Our experimental demonstration of a G X U base pair in helix V supports the 5S RNA secondary structural model of Luehrsen and Fox [Luehrsen, K. R., & Fox, G.E. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 2150-2154]. Finally, the base-pair proton peak assigned to the terminal G X U in helix V of the RNase T2 cleaved fragment is shifted downfield from that in the intact 5S RNA, suggesting that helices I and V may be coaxial in intact T. utilis 5S RNA.     

Crosslinking of transcription factor TFIIIA to ribosomal 5S RNA from X. laevis by trans-diamminedichloroplatinum (II)

Trans-diamminnedichloroplatinum (II) was used to induce reversible crosslinks between 5S rRNA and TFIIIA within the 7S RNP particle from X. laevis immature oocyte. The crosslinked fragments have been unambiguously identified. These fragments exclusively arise from three RNA regions centered around the hinge region at the junction of the three helical domains. Major crosslinking sites are located in region 9-21 (comprising loops A and helix II) and region 54-71 (comprising loop B, helices II and V). A minor site is also found in the 3' part of helix I and helix V (region 100-120). Our results point to the crucial role of the junction region and of the three-dimensional folding of the RNA in the recognition of the 5S rRNA by TFIIIA.     

The lonepair triloop: a new motif in RNA structure

The lonepair triloop (LPTL) is an RNA structural motif that contains a single ("lone") base-pair capped by a hairpin loop containing three nucleotides. The two nucleotides immediately outside of this motif (5' and 3' to the lonepair) are not base-paired to one another, restricting the length of this helix to a single base-pair. Four examples of this motif, along with three tentative examples, were initially identified in the 16S and 23S rRNAs with covariation analysis. An evaluation of the recently determined crystal structures of the Thermus thermophilus 30S and Haloarcula marismortui 50S ribosomal subunits revealed the authenticity for all of these proposed interactions and identified 16 more LPTLs in the 5S, 16S and 23S rRNAs. This motif is found in the T loop in the tRNA crystal structures. The lonepairs are positioned, in nearly all examples, immediately 3' to a regular secondary structure helix and are stabilized by coaxial stacking onto this flanking helix. In all but two cases, the nucleotides in the triloop are involved in a tertiary interaction with another section of the rRNA, establishing an overall three-dimensional function for this motif. Of these 24 examples, 14 occur in multi-stem loops, seven in hairpin loops and three in internal loops. While the most common lonepair, U:A, occurs in ten of the 24 LPTLs, the remaining 14 LPTLs contain seven different base-pair types. Only a few of these lonepairs adopt the standard Watson-Crick base-pair conformations, while the majority of the base-pairs have non-standard conformations. While the general three-dimensional conformation is similar for all examples of this motif, characteristic differences lead to several subtypes present in different structural environments. At least one triloop nucleotide in 22 of the 24 LPTLs in the rRNAs and tRNAs forms a tertiary interaction with another part of the RNA. When a LPTL containing the GNR or UYR triloop sequence forms a tertiary interaction with the first (and second) triloop nucleotide, it recruits a fourth nucleotide to mediate stacking and mimic the tetraloop conformation. Approximately half of the LPTL motifs are in close association with proteins. The majority of these LPTLs are positioned at sites in rRNAs that are conserved in the three phylogenetic domains; a few of these occur in regions of the rRNA associated with ribosomal function, including the presumed site of peptidyl transferase activity in the 23S rRNA.     

Is there a special function for U.G basepairs in ribosomal RNA?

U.G basepairs are well-established elements of RNA structure. The geometry of this pair is different, however, from classical Watson-Crick basepairs. This leads to an unusual stacking of the basepair: overlap with the basepair at the 5' side of the U (and the 3' side of the G) is strong (stacked) while it is weak with the basepair on the other side (destacked). The closure of an RNA helix by a U.G pair will be energetically unfavourable when the U residue occupies the 5' end. In transfer RNA there is a strong selection against a 'destacked' U.G pair at helix ends. In the 16S rRNA model of Escherichia coli there are 72 U.G pairs of which 36 or 22 occupy a helix end, depending on how such an end is defined. There is a slight preference for 'stacked' U.G's in these positions. It is remarkable, however, that of 13 very conserved U.G pairs in the 16S (-like) rRNA, 7 occur at helix ends and that 5 of these have the 'destacked' configuration. It is suggested that these pairs, if they exist at all in a hydrogen-bounded form, are stabilized by co-axial stacking with other helices or by interaction with a protein.     

Structure and function of the conserved 690 hairpin in Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA: analysis of the stem nucleotides

Nucleotides 680 to 710 of Escherichia coli 16 S rRNA form a distinct structural domain required for ribosome function. The goal of this study was to determine the functional significance of pairing interactions in the 690 region. Two different secondary structures were proposed for this hairpin, based on phylogenetic and chemical modification studies. To study the effect of pairing interactions in the 690 hairpin on ribosome function and to determine which of the proposed secondary structures is biologically significant, we performed an instant-evolution experiment in which the nine nucleotides that form the proposed base-pairs and dangling ends of the 690 stem were randomly mutated, and functional mutant combinations were selected. A total of 96 unique functional mutants were isolated, assayed in vivo, and sequenced. Analysis of these data revealed extensive base-pairing and stacking interactions among the mutated nucleotides. Formation of either a Watson-Crick base-pair or G.U pair between positions 688 and 699 is absolutely required for ribosome function. We also performed NMR studies of a 31-nucleotide RNA which indicate the formation of a functionally important base-pair between nucleotides 688 and 699. Formation of a second base-pair between positions 689 and 698, however, is not essential for ribosome function, but the level of ribosome function correlates with the predicted thermodynamic stability of the nucleotide pairs in these positions. The universally conserved positions G690 and U697 are generally portrayed as forming a G.U mismatch. Our data show co-variation between these positions, but do not support the hypothesis that the G690:U697 pair forms a wobble structure. NMR studies of model 14-nt and 31-nt RNAs support these findings and show that G690 and U697 are involved in unusual stacking interactions but do not form a wobble pair. Preliminary NMR structural analysis reveals that the loop portion of the 690 hairpin folds into a highly structured and novel conformation.     

Structure and function of the conserved 690 hairpin in Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA. II. NMR solution structure

The solution structure of the conserved 690 hairpin from Escherichia coli 16 S rRNA was determined by NMR spectroscopy. The 690 loop is located at the surface of the 30 S subunit in the platform region and has been implicated in interactions with P-site bound tRNA, E-site mRNA, S11 binding, IF3 binding, and in RNA-RNA interactions with the 790 loop of 16 S rRNA and domain IV of 23 S rRNA. The structure reveals a novel sheared type G690.U697 base-pair with a single hydrogen bond from the G690 amino to U697-04. G691 and A696 also form a sheared pair and U692 forms a U-turn with an H-bond to the A695 non-bridging phosphate oxygen. The sheared pairs and U-turn result in the continuous single-stranded stacking of five residues from 6693 to U697 with their Watson-Crick functional groups exposed in the minor groove. The overall fold of the 690 hairpin is similar to the anticodon loop of tRNA. The structure provides an explanation for chemical protection patterns in the loop upon interaction with tRNA, the 50 S subunit, and S11. In vivo genetic studies demonstrate the functional importance of the motifs observed in the solution structure of the 690 hairpin.     

Identification and assignment of base pairs in the "tuned helix" of intact and ribonuclease T1 cleavage fragments of wheat germ ribosomal 5S RNA via 500-MHz proton homonuclear Overhauser enhancements

Wheat germ has been chosen as a representative eukaryote for study of ribosomal 5S RNA secondary structure. Proton homonuclear Overhauser enhancements (NOE's) at 500 MHz for the hydrogen-bonded base-pair protons in the 10-15 ppm region are used to establish the identity (A X U, G X C, or G X U) and base-pair sequence (e.g., G X C-A X U-C X G) within a given helical segment. Assignment of that segment to particular base pairs in the secondary structure is based upon NOE's conducted at different temperatures (to determine which signals "melt" together), variation of salt conditions (to produce differential chemical shifts in order to better distinguish components of an unresolved spectral envelope), and isolation and purification of RNase T1 cleavage fragments (in order to reduce the spectrum to just a few base pairs). The NOE patterns for the RNase T1 fragments are the same as in the intact 5S RNA, supporting the assumption that structural features of this region in the intact 5S RNA are preserved in the fragment. Chemical shifts predicted from ring current induced effects for a proposed base-pair sequence are then compared to experimental chemical shifts. By these methods, a portion of the "tuned helix" segment (namely, the base-pair sequence C18G60-A19U59-C20G58) is demonstrated spectroscopically for the first time in any 5S RNA. The tuned helix and common arm segments are less stable than the rest of the molecule. Variation of sodium and magnesium levels reveals multiple configurations of the wheat germ 5S RNA in solution.     

Delineation of structural domains in eukaryotic 5S rRNA with a rhodium probe.

The three-dimensional folding of Xenopus oocyte 5S rRNA has been examined using the coordination complex Rh(phen)2phi3+ (phen = phenanthroline; phi = phenanthrenequinone diimine) as a structural probe. Rh(phen)2phi3+ binds neither double-helical RNA nor unstructured single-stranded regions of RNA. Instead, the complex targets through photoactivated cleavage sites of tertiary interaction which are open in the major groove and accessible to stacking. The sites targeted by the rhodium complex have been mapped on the wild-type Xenopus oocyte RNA, on a truncated RNA representing the arm of the molecule comprised of helix IV-loop E-helix V, and on several single-nucleotide mutants of the 5S rRNA. On the wild-type 5S rRNA, strong cleavage is found at residues U73, A74, A101, and U102 in the E loop and U80 and G81 in helix IV; additional sites are evident at A22 and A56 in the B loop, C29 and A32 in helix III, and C34, C39, A42, and C44 in the C loop. Given the similarity observed in cleavage between the full 5S RNA and the truncated fragment as well as the absence of any long-range effects on cleavage in mutant RNAs, the results do not support models which involve long-range tertiary interactions. Cleavage results with Rh(phen)2phi3+ do, however, indicate that the apposition of several noncanonical bases as well as stem--loop junctions may result in intimately stacked structures with opened major grooves. In particular, on the basis of cleavage results on mutant RNAs, both loops C and E represent structures where the strands constituting each loop are not independent of one another but are intrinsically structured.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mutational analysis of the RNA pseudoknot involved in efficient ribosomal frameshifting in simian retrovirus-1.

Mutational effects on frameshifting efficiency of the RNA pseudoknot involved in ribosomal frameshifting in simian retrovirus-1 (SRV-1) have been investigated. The primary sequence and the proposed secondary structure of the SRV-1 pseudoknot are similar to those of other efficient frameshifting pseudoknots in mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), where an unpaired adenine nucleotide intercalates between stem 1 and stem 2. In SRV-1 pseudoknot, the adenine nucleotide in between stem 1 and stem 2 has a potential to form an A*U base pair with the last uridine nucleotide in the loop 2, resulting in a continuous A-form helix with coaxially stacked stem 1 and stem 2. To test whether this A*U base pairing and coaxial stacking of stem 1 and stem 2 is absolutely required for efficient frameshifting in SRV-1, a series of mutants changing this potential A.U base pair to either G.C base pair or A.A, A.G, A.C, G.A, G.G mismatch is generated, and their frameshifting efficiencies are investigated in vitro using rabbit reticulocyte lysate translation assay. The frameshifting abilities of these mutant pseudoknots are similar to that of the wild-type pseudoknot, suggesting that the A*U base pair in between stem 1 and stem 2 is not necessary to promote efficient frameshifting in SRV-1. These results reveal that coaxial stacking of stem 1 and stem 2 with a Watson-Crick A.U base pair in between two stems is not a required structural feature of the pseudoknot for promoting efficient frameshifting in SRV-1. Our mutational data suggest that SRV-1 pseudoknot adopts similar structural features common to other efficient frameshifting pseudoknots as observed in MMTV and FIV.     

Identification and assignment of base pairs in four helical segments of Bacillus megaterium ribosomal 5S RNA and its ribonuclease T1 cleavage fragments by means of 500-MHz proton homonuclear Overhauser enhancements.

Three different fragments of Bacillus megaterium ribosomal 5S RNA have been produced by enzymatic cleavage with ribonuclease T1. Fragment A consists of helices II and III, fragment B contains helix IV, and fragment C contains helix I of the universal 5S rRNA secondary structure. All (eight) imino proton resonances in the downfield region (9-15 ppm) of the 500-MHz proton FT NMR spectrum of fragment B have been identified and assigned as G80.C92-G81.C91-G82.C90-A83.++ +U89-C84.G88 and three unpaired U's (U85, U86, and U87) in helix IV by proton homonuclear Overhauser enhancement connectivities. The secondary structure in helix IV of the prokaryotic loop is completely demonstrated spectroscopically for the first time in any native or enzyme-cleaved 5S rRNA. In addition, G21.C58-A20.U59-G19.C60-A18.U61 in helix II, U32.A46-G31.C47-C30.G48-C29.G49 in helix III, and G4.C112-G5.C111-U6.G110 in the terminal stem (helix I) have been assigned by means of NOE experiments on intact 5S rRNA and its fragments A and C. Base pairs in helices I-IV of the universal secondary structure of B. megaterium 5S RNA are described.     

A story: unpaired adenosine bases in ribosomal RNAs

In 1985 an analysis of the Escherichia coli 16 S rRNA covariation-based structure model revealed a strong bias for unpaired adenosines. The same analysis revealed that the majority of the G, C, and U bases were paired. These biases are (now) consistent with the high percentage of unpaired adenosine nucleotides in several structure motifs.An analysis of a larger set of bacterial comparative 16 S and 23 S rRNA structure models has substantiated this initial finding and revealed new biases in the distribution of adenosine nucleotides in loop regions. The majority of the adenosine nucleotides are unpaired, while the majority of the G, C, and U bases are paired in the covariation-based structure model. The unpaired adenosine nucleotides predominate in the middle and at the 3' end of loops, and are the second most frequent nucleotide type at the 5' end of loops (G is the most common nucleotide). There are additional biases for unpaired adenosine nucleotides at the 3' end of loops and adjacent to a G at the 5' end of the helix. The most prevalent consecutive nucleotides are GG, GA, AG, and AA. A total of 70 % of the GG sequences are within helices, while more than 70 % of the AA sequences are unpaired. Nearly 50 % of the GA sequences are unpaired, and approximately one-third of the AG sequences are within helices while another third are at the 3' loop.5' helix junction. Unpaired positions with an adenosine nucleotide in more than 50 % of the sequences at the 3' end of 16 S and 23 S rRNA loops were identified and arranged into the A-motif categories XAZ, AAZ, XAG, AAG, and AAG:U, where G or Z is paired, G:U is a base-pair, and X is not an A and Z is not a G in more than 50 % of the sequences. These sequence motifs were associated with several structural motifs, such as adenosine platforms, E and E-like loops, A:A and A:G pairings at the end of helices, G:A tandem base-pairs, GNRA tetraloop hairpins, and U-turns.     

Initiation factor 3-induced structural changes in the 30 S ribosomal subunit and in complexes containing tRNA(f)(Met) and mRNA

Initiation factor 3 (IF3) acts to switch the decoding preference of the small ribosomal subunit from elongator to initiator tRNA. The effects of IF3 on the 30 S ribosomal subunit and on the 30 S.mRNA. tRNA(f)(Met) complex were determined by UV-induced RNA crosslinking. Three intramolecular crosslinks in the 16 S rRNA (of the 14 that were monitored by gel electrophoresis) are affected by IF3. These are the crosslinks between C1402 and C1501 within the decoding region, between C967xC1400 joining the end loop of a helix of 16 S rRNA domain III and the decoding region, and between U793 and G1517 joining the 790 end loop of 16 S rRNA domain II and the end loop of the terminal helix. These changes occur even in the 30 S.IF3 complex, indicating they are not mediated through tRNA(f)(Met) or mRNA. UV-induced crosslinks occur between 16 S rRNA position C1400 and tRNA(f)(Met) position U34, in tRNA(f)(Met) the nucleotide adjacent to the 5' anticodon nucleotide, and between 16 S rRNA position C1397 and the mRNA at positions +9 and +10 (where A of the initiator AUG codon is +1). The presence of IF3 reduces both of these crosslinks by twofold and fourfold, respectively. The binding site for IF3 involves the 790 region, some other parts of the 16 S rRNA domain II and the terminal stem/loop region. These are located in the front bottom part of the platform structure in the 30 S subunit, a short distance from the decoding region. The changes that occur in the decoding region, even in the absence of mRNA and tRNA, may be induced by IF3 from a short distance or could be caused by the second IF3 structural domain.     

Contributions of dangling end stacking and terminal base-pair formation to the stabilities of XGGCCp, XCCGGp, XGGCCYp, and XCCGGYp helixes

The role of stacking in terminal base-pair formation was studied by comparison of the stability increments for dangling ends to those for fully formed base pairs. Thermodynamic parameters were measured spectrophotometrically for helix formation of the hexanucleotides AGGCCUp, UGGCCAp, CGGCCGp, GCCGGCp, and UCCGGAp and for the corresponding pentanucleotides containing a 5'-dangling end on the GGCCp or CCGGp core helix. In 1 M NaCl at 1 X 10(-4) M strands, a 5'-dangling nucleotide in this series increases the duplex melting temperature (Tm) only 0-4 degrees C, about the same as adding a 5'-phosphate. In contrast, a 3'-dangling nucleotide increases the Tm at 1 X 10(-4) M strands 7-23 degrees C, depending on the sequence [Freier, S. M., Burger, B. J., Alkema, D., Neilson, T., & Turner, D. H. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 6198-6206]. These results are consistent with stacking patterns observed in A-form RNA. The stability increments from terminal A.U, C.G, or U.A base pairs on GGCC or a terminal U.A pair on CCGG are nearly equal to the sums of the stability increments from the corresponding dangling ends. This suggests stacking plays a large role in nucleic acid stability. The stability increment from the terminal base pairs in GCCGGCp, however, is about 5 times the sum of the corresponding dangling ends, suggesting hydrogen bonding can also make important contributions.     

Mutations in 5S DNA and 5S RNA have different effects on the binding of Xenopus transcription factor IIIA

The effects on TFIIIA binding affinity of a series of substitution mutations in the Xenopus laevis oocyte 5S RNA gene were quantified. These data indicate that TFIIIA binds specifically to 5S DNA by forming sequence-specific contacts with three discrete sites located within the classical A and C boxes and the intermediate element of the internal control region. Substitution of the nucleotide sequence at any of the three sites significantly reduces TFIIIA binding affinity, with a 100-fold reduction observed for substitutions in the box C subregion. These results are consistent with a direct interaction of TFIIIA with specific base pairs within the major groove of the DNA. A comparison of the TFIIIA binding data for the same mutations expressed in 5S RNA indicates that the protein does not make any strong sequence-specific contacts with the RNA. Although the protein footprinting sites on the 5S DNA and 5S RNA are coincident, nucleotide substitutions in 5S RNA which moderately reduce TFIIIA binding affinity do not correspond at all to the three specific TFIIIA interaction sites within the gene. The implications of these results for models which attempt to reconcile the DNA and RNA binding activities of TFIIIA by proposing a common structural motif for the two nucleic acids are discussed.