Processing liquid-based gynecologic specimens: comparison of the available techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a cytopreparation protocol suitable for satisfactory processing by the AutoCyte PREP System with the gynecologic specimens collected in PreservCyt fluid for the ThinPrep machine. STUDY DESIGN: The residue of a number of gynecologic specimens collected in PreservCyt and processed by ThinPrep were processed by AutoCyte PREP. Some modifications were made in the cytopreparatory protocol in order to obtain satisfactory specimens. RESULTS: The ThinPrep and AutoCyte PREP specimens were examined independently. The results were comparable, with a high degree of concordance between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: Gynecologic specimens collected in PreservCyt and following the ThinPrep specimen collection protocol can be processed using the AutoCyte PREP System. Minor protocol modifications provided comparable diagnostic material. Additional studies are needed to explore the feasibility of this approach and fulfill the various U.S. regulatory agency requirements for the liquid-based Pap test.     

Evaluation of a centrifuge method and thin-layer preparation in urine cytology

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the quality and cost of urine cytology using the Cytospin method (Shandon, ThermoElectron Corporation, Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) and the AutoCyte PREP (TriPath Imaging, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in a general laboratory. STUDY DESIGN: A study of differences between the Cytospin method and AutoCyte PREP in the areas of specimen preparation, staining, number and quality of diagnostic cells, background, screener preference, and cost was undertaken over a 3-month period in 2000. Sixty fresh voided urine samples from 25 patients with known transitional cell carcinoma were prepared by the Cytospin method and the AutoCyte PREP according to the manufacturers' instructions. RESULTS: The Cytospin method had longer preparation time but shorter screening time than the AutoCyte PREP. The number of diagnostic cells was higher in the Cytospin method. Fixation quality and staining clarity were better in the Cytospin method. Qualitative assessment of cell arrangements, cell and nuclear size and shape, nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear membrane irregularity showed no significant differences between the 2 methods. Cellular details and nuclear chromatin patterns were clearer and better preserved in the Cytospin method, but the AutoCyte PREP showed less blood and inflammatory cells and debris. CONCLUSION: In the majority of cases the screeners preferred the Cytospin method due to its better overall cytologic quality. However, the amount of blood, inflammation and debris was much lower in the AutoCyte PREP. This reduced the need to make a second, diluted specimen and made turnaround time faster. The AutoCyte PREP was 7 times more expensive than the Cytospin method.     

Evaluation of the AutoCyte SCREEN system in a clinical cytopathology laboratory

OBJECTIVE: To compare the AutoCyte SCREEN (AutoCyte, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) system with manual screening by experienced cytotechnologists using thin-layer preparations that had been previously extensively studied and their cytologic abnormalities well defined. STUDY DESIGN: AutoCyte PREP (AutoCyte) samples prepared for a previous split-sample study comparing thin-layer preparations to conventional smears were used. These 1,992 AutoCyte PREP samples were in a cohort the abnormal findings of which had been confirmed via independent review by two sets of pathologists. For the current study, these samples were remasked and evaluated by the AutoCyte SCREEN system in a clinical laboratory. The instrument scanned each slide and selected six overview fields and 120 single objects for storage and display. The computer classified each slide in one of the following categories: abnormal, uncertain, normal or unsatisfactory. Independently for each case, a cytotechnologist evaluated the six fields and 120 objects selected by the instrument as abnormal, normal or unsatisfactory. For those cases classified as uncertain by AutoCyte, the technologist then reexamined the cellular displays and entered a consensus classification. These results were then compared to those of an independent review by cytotechnologists of the identical set of slides using routine manual screening. RESULTS: The AutoCyte SCREEN selected 35% of slides for manual review. Technologist and computer rendered equivalent classifications in 79%. Of the total slides screened by the AutoCyte SCREEN, 57% were classified as "uncertain," and 88% of these were subsequently classified as normal by consensus. Using the well-defined abnormal values of the cellular sample as a basis for calculation, the AutoCyte SCREEN-assisted practice had a diagnostic sensitivity of 85% and diagnostic specificity of 97.6%. Comparable values for manual screening of the identical cellular sample were a diagnostic sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 97.4%. CONCLUSION: The AutoCyte SCREEN achieves comparable or greater sensitivity in detecting cervical abnormalities in comparison with manual screening. When combined with the substantial advantage of thin-layer preparations over conventional smears, the AutoCyte SCREEN provides a screening system of superior sensitivity over conventionally prepared and examined cervical smears.     

Analysis of urine cytology tests in 120 paired cases

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the smear quality and diagnostic accuracy of ThinPrep processing in comparison to conventional Cytospin technique for urinary cytology. STUDY DESIGN: ThinPrep and Cytospin techniques were retrospectively evaluated by 2 observers in a double-blinded, randomized fashion. Each quality parameter was scored using a semi-quantitative score of 1-3. Diagnostic accuracy indices were calculated with biopsy histology as the gold standard. RESULTS: Quality of cellular distribution and cell preservation were better with Cytospin preparations, whereas ThinPrep smears were superior in terms of stain distribution and cleaner slide background. However, the only significant differences observed were in cellular distribution and a clean background (p < 0.05). Sensitivity and positive and negative predictive values were higher with Cytospin than the ThinPrep technique (90.0%, 94.7% and 71.4% vs. 80.0%, 94.1% and 55.6%, respectively). Conversely, the specificity of both techniques was comparable. CONCLUSION: The Cytospin smears were of better quality than those prepared by the ThinPrep technique. Although both techniques resulted in similar diagnostic accuracies in negative cases, the ThinPrep preparations were not found to be superior to Cytospin smears in diagnosing positive urinary cytology.     

A comparative study: conventional preparation and ThinPrep® 2000 in respiratory cytology

In order to compare and contrast conventional preparation (CP) with ThinPrep 2000 (TP) in respiratory cytology, 207 samples were divided equally and processed by the two different preparation methods, generating three CP and one TP slide per sample. No lesion identified by CP was missed by TP and there were no significant differences between TP and CP in the diagnostic categories. However, two cases of squamous cell carcinoma were detected on TP which had been classified as unsatisfactory and moderate squamous dyskaryosis, respectively, on CP. ThinPrep was found to be superior to CP in many respects as it provided standardized preparations in a greater proportion of cases and problems such as cell overlapping and background debris were markedly reduced. In several instances the diagnostic accuracy in CP was compromised by smears that were either too thick, too thin, or too scanty. Cell preservation was also better on TP when compared with CP, facilitating more accurate diagnosis and significantly reducing the primary screening and reporting time, especially of sputum samples. A major advantage of TP methodology is the fact that it facilitates optimal use of skilled cytotechnologists and streamlines the workflow in the laboratory.     

Cytologic features of urothelial carcinoma in catheterized urine with cellular fragments

OBJECTIVE: To identify architectural and cytomorphologic differences that might help distinguish urothelial neoplasms from instrumentation artifact. STUDY DESIGN: We examined 73 cytologic smears of catheterized urine containing urothelial cell clusters between 1998 and 2004. All patients had at least 1 follow-up biopsy. Smears were reviewed for several morphologic features blindly, without knowledge of the follow-up diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 73 smears, 39 had a benign diagnosis on follow-up biopsy, and 34 had urothelial carcinoma. Cytoplasmic collar, regular and rounded fragment borders, and fine nuclear chromatin were statistically more common in benign smears than those with urothelial carcinoma (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were identified with regard to the presence of background inflammation or nucleoli in the urine specimens. Of the 17 smears that had a cytoplasmic collar, regular fragment borders and fine nuclear chromatin, only 1 (6%) was found to have urothelial carcinoma on follow-up biopsy. All 20 smears in which all 3 features were absent were proven malignant on biopsy. CONCLUSION: Certain architectural and nuclear features can help differentiate urothelial neoplasms from instrumentation artifact in urine cytologic smears.     

Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations on fine needle aspiration cytology material

OBJECTIVE: To compare the various cytologic features on ThinPrep 2000 (TP) (Cytyc Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) and conventional preparation (CP) specimens from fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) material by a semiquantitative scoring system. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study a total of 71 consecutive cases were included. In each case, two passes were performed. The first pass was used for conventional preparations, with direct smears made and fixed immediately in 95% alcohol for Papanicolaou stain. For TP preparation a second pass produced material for processing in the ThinPrep 2000. The TP and CP slides were studied independently by two observers and representative slides of CP and TP compared for cellularity, background blood and necrotic cell debris, cell architecture, informative background, presence of monolayer cells, and nuclear and cytoplasmic details by a semiquantitative scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed by Wilcoxon's signed rank test on an SPSS program (Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.). RESULTS: TP preparations contained adequate diagnostic cells in all cases and were tangibly superior to CP preparations concerning monolayer cells, absence of blood and necrosis, and preservation of nuclear and cytoplasmic detail (statistically significant, Wilcoxon's signed rank test, P < .000). CONCLUSION: TP preparations are superior to conventional preparations with regard to clear background, monolayer cell preparation and cell preservation. It is easier and less time consuming to screen and interpret TP preparations because the cells are limited to smaller areas on clear backgrounds, with excellent cellular preservation. However, TP preparations are more expensive than CP and require some experience for interpretation.     

Liquid-based cytology in breast fine needle aspiration. Comparison with the conventional smear

OBJECTIVE: To compare the various cytologic features on AutoCyte Prep (ACP) (AutoCyte, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) and conventional preparation (CP) specimens from breast fine needle aspiration cytology material with a semi-quantitative scoring system. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 100 randomized cases were studied. In each case, 2 passes were performed. One pass was used for CPs (Giemsa and Papanicolaou stain). The other pass produced material for the ACP technique and Papanicolaou stain. Both the conventional and liquid-based preparations were studied independently by two observers and compared for cellularity, obscuring and/or informing background, representative diagnostic material, preservation of cytomorphologic features, presence of monolayer cells and architectural arrangement. RESULTS: Comparing the two preparations, the results were as follows: (1) ACP was superior to CP in 2 features, lack of obscuring background and presence of monolayer arrangement with preservation of cell architecture; (2) ACP was inferior to CP in 1 feature, lack of informing background; and (3) ACP was equal, with small deviations, to CP in the rest of the features evaluated: cellularity, representative diagnostic material, preservation of cell morphology and architectural arrangement. CONCLUSION: The new technology of liquid-based cytology in breast FNA showed a good correlation with CP plus the advantages of: (1) easier and less time consuming evaluation of cell morphology (clear background, no overlapping, smaller area to screen); (2) reproducibility, a factor of great importance to quality control; and (3) possibility of adjunctive investigations (immunocytology, flow cytometry) on the same material.     

Comparison of TriPath thin-layer technology with conventional methods on nongynecologic specimens

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the TriPath PREP (previously called AutoCyte) TriPath Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in nongynecologic cytologic material by performing side-by-side comparison of conventional preparations with TriPath-prepared slides. STUDY DESIGN: An initial study of 613 cases (set A) was conducted to compare the TriPath PREP system with conventional methods for the evaluation of nongynecologic specimens, including urine, body cavity effusions, cerebrospinal fluid, pulmonary and gastrointestinal specimens. Paired cases were evaluated for cellularity, staining quality, preservation and representation of diagnostic material. Subsequent changes in the automated technique warranted reevaluation of the TriPath method. The follow-up study of 259 cases (set B) was conducted with the same design as set A. Results of evaluated parameters were analyzed using the chi 2 test. RESULTS: Results of the two sets were strikingly different. Prior to technical changes made by the laboratory, the TriPath method was significantly inferior. In the second set, the preferred material was most commonly the TriPath-prepared material. In particular, the majority of urine samples were prepared better by the automated, thin-layer system. CONCLUSION: The TriPath PREP system offers a reliable preparation of urine and has potential for other nongynecologic specimens, provided that careful attention is paid to technical details and some adjustments are made to account for specimen variability.     

Thin-layer preparations of dithiothreitol-treated bronchial washing specimens

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the combined effect of dithiothreitol (DTT) treatment and ThinPrep (TP) (Cytyc Corp, Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) processing on bronchial washing specimens. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 431 bronchial washing specimens were initially treated with 0.05% DTT in a 30% methanol solution. After centrifugation, 1 TP slide and 2-4 conventional cytospin or smear preparations (CPs) were prepared. The reports of both preparations were compared in all cases. All 48 abnormal cases and 52 consecutive negative cases were also compared for cellular composition, distribution of the cells, ease of interpretation and overall preparation quality. Screening time was recorded for 20 of the cases. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of one TP slide appeared comparable to that of 2-4 CPs. The TP slide was assessed to be equal or superior in overall quality to CP in 85% of 100 cases of paired specimens. The cleaner background and smaller cellular area of TP slides significantly reduced the screening time. Mucolysis and specimen homogenization were not always optimal, occasionally resulting in uneven subsampling and poorly cellular TPs. However, in general, TP slides were considered superior to CPs in overall quality. CONCLUSION: Improvement in specimen quality and reduced screening time have to be balanced against the high cost of consumables with the TP technique.     

Comparison of manual and automated methods of liquid-based cytology. A morphologic study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morphologic characteristics of gynecologic samples prepared by 3 different methods of liquid-based cytology. STUDY DESIGN: Cytologic samples from representative cases of each diagnostic category of squamous epithelial lesion, prepared by automated and manual liquid-based systems, were analyzed by 3 laboratories in the United States, Portugal and Brazil. The systems included: ThinPrep (automated, U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved; Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.), Autocyte PREP (South American system, manual; TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) and DNACITOLIQ (manual; Digene Brazil, S?o Paulo, Brazil). A panel of 16 morphologic parameters was evaluated: cellularity, clean background, uniform distribution, artifacts, cellular overlapping, architectural and cytoplasmic distortion, cytoplasmic vacuolization, cellular elongation, imprecise cytoplasmic borders, folded cytoplasmic borders, nuclear hyperchromasia, coarse chromatin, prominent nucleolus, irregular nuclear borders, atypical mitosis and inflammatory infiltrate. Negative, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cases were included. Cases without biopsies were confirmed by consensus. RESULTS: Cellularity was adequate in all samples. Clean background was observed in the vast majority of samples with all liquid-based systems. Uniform distribution was frequently found in ThinPrep and Autocyte PREP samples but not in DNACITOLIQ. Artifacts were not present in DNACITOLIQ samples, rare in ThinPrep and observed in 8 (34.7%) Autocyte PREP. Cellular overlapping was observed in all 3 system samples: 11 (31.42%) cases in ThinPrep, 16 (69.56%) in Autocyte PREP and 17 (68%) in DNACITOLIQ System. Architectural and cytoplasmic distortion were present in 3 cases of HSIL (13%) and cytoplasmic vacuolization in 2 cases of LSIL and 1 HSIL of Autocyte PREP. Cellular elongation was found in 13 (56.5%) Autocyte PREP and in 5 (20%) DNACITOLIQ samples. Inflammatory infiltrate was found in all 3 system samples but with more frequency in the Autocyte PREP (69.56%) and DNACITOLIQ System (72%). CONCLUSION: This study clearly indicated that in spite of the different methodologies, the 3 methods adequately preserved cellular structure for morphologic evaluation. The choice of method will depend on price, availability and procedures involved.     

Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait

OBJECTIVE: To compare ThinPrep (TP) Papanicolaou smears (Cytyc Corp., Box-borough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) with matching conventional Papanicolaou (CP) smears for specimen adequacy, cytologic quality, diagnostic accuracy and screening time. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study of 1,024 women a split-sample, matched-pair design in favor of CP slides based on single-blind criteria was followed with a smear on a glass slide for CP and the remaining material collected in Preserv-Cyt solution (Cytyc) for a TP smear. A Cytobrush (Medscand, Hollywood, Florida, U.S.A.) was used for smear preparation for CP. TP smears were processed in ThinPrep 2000 (Cytyc). Smears were stained with Papanicolaou stain and were interpreted according to the Bethesda system. RESULTS: The number of satisfactory but limited (SBL) cases with TP were 77 (7.5%) as compared to 127 (12.4%) with the CP method. This reduction in SBL smears with the TP method and consequent increase in satisfactory smears were highly significant (P < .001) by McNemar's test. As regards unsatisfactory smears in discordant pairs, although the number of unsatisfactory smears was higher with TP (41 cases) as against CP (27 cases), the difference was not statistically significant (P < .05). The split-sample method showed a high correlation between the CP and TP diagnoses. TP smears had a significant advantage over CP smears in the reduction in the number of ASCUS and AGUS cases (14 vs. 29) (P < .05) and increased the pickup rate of LSIL, 6 vs. 1. Time taken to screen the TP smears was half that of CP smears. No cases of LSIL or HSIL were missed on TP smears. CONCLUSION: The liquid-based processor significantly improved the adequacy and quality of smears, resulting in fewer recall cases for SBL smears, leading to more definitive diagnoses in atypical cases, increasing the pickup rate of LSILs and reducing the screening time. A machine handling multiple specimens automatically would decrease cost and be an asset to a cytopathology laboratory.     

An Australian trial of ThinPrep: a new cytopreparatory technique

To evaluate the sensitivity and suitability of ThinPrep, a new slide preparation technique, 2026 paired cervical cytology slides were examined. After conventional Papanicolaou smears were prepared, the sampling instruments were rinsed in a fluid fixative. ThinPrep slides were then prepared in the laboratory from the surplus cells in the fixative. Compared with the Pap smears, ThinPrep slides were easier and quicker to screen, were inconclusive less often, and had similar rates for detecting abnormalities and infection. There were more unsatisfactory ThinPrep slides and more ThinPrep slides lacked endocervical cells. Both of these shortcomings were found to be linked to the choice of sampling implements. This study, in which a variety of sampling instruments was used, fails to confirm some of the previous claims made for the new technique.     

Liquid-based vs. conventional smears in fine needle aspiration of bone and soft tissue tumors

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology of bone and soft tissue tumors utilizing ThinPrep (TP) (Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) vs. conventional smears (CS). STUDY DESIGN: Fine needle aspiration cytology from bone and soft tissue tumors was processed and assessed for cellularity, nuclear and cytoplasmic preservation, cellular architecture and stromal background with both the TP liquid-based smear technique and conventional methods. RESULTS: An accurate diagnosis was made in 13% of TP cases as compared to 64% in CS cases. CONCLUSION: CS of fine needle aspiration sample is far superior to TP in diagnosing tumors of bone and soft tissues. Preservation of cytoplasmic features and cellular architecture was superior in conventionally prepared smears.     

Effectiveness of liquid-based cytology and papanicolaou tests in a low risk population

OBJECTIVE: To compare sensitivity an effectiveness of ThinPrep vs. Pap Test and determine whether the Hybrid Capture System II (HCII) for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) could increase the sensitivity and effectiveness of cervical screening in a low risk population. STUDY DESIGN: We present a comparative observer, blind, "split sample" study of ThinPrep and Papanicolaou staining in a population of 2026 consecutive women. RESULTS: Conventional Papanicolaou stain detected lesions in 62 cases (3.06%), including 1 atypical glandular cell of undetermined significance (AGUS), 34 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (1.73% of atypias), 20 (0.99%) low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and 7 (0.35%) high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). ThinPrep detected lesions in 63 cases (3.11%), including 26 (1.28%) ASCUS, 27 (1.33%) LSIL and 10 (0.49%) HSIL. Despite this overall similarity, only 35 had a coincident cytopathologic result by both methods. The kappa concordance index between ThinPrep and Pap was 0.546. Sensitivity and specificity were 74.6 and 45.0 in ThinPrep and 69.5 and 25.0 in Papanicolaou-stained smears. High risk HPV (HR-HP 17) was positive in 13 of ZOASCUS and in 21 of 22 SIL. CONCLUSION: Technologies now widely available such as Thin Prep and viral detection aim to improve accuracy of screening.     

A thin-layer,liquid-based pap test for mass screening in an area of China with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. A cross-sectional,comparative study

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the accuracy of the ThinPrep Pap Test (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) on the basis of histologic diagnosis by biopsy and the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in mass screening. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1,997 women residing in Xiangyuan County, Shanxi Province, P.R.C., an area with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma, were enrolled in this study. We collected exfoliative cervical samples from all subjects into a liquid buffer (Preserv-Cyt [Cytyc]) and utilized for both cytologic screening using the ThinPrep Pap Test and HPV DNA testing. Subsequent colposcopic biopsies were taken on all subjects. All the tests were performed in an independent and blinded fashion. We compared the ThinPrep Pap test with colposcopic biopsy and HPV test. RESULTS: High grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) (CIN 2/3) were identified in 74 (3.7%) of 1,993 women adequately assessed, and there were 12 cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The false negative rate of ThinPrep cytology was 3.2% for biopsy-confirmed CIN 3 and 9.3% for CIN 2. Twenty-seven (87%) of the 31 women with biopsy-confirmed CIN 3 and 12 (100%) of 12 with biopsy-confirmed SCC had a diagnosis of either HSIL or greater abnormalities on ThinPrep cytology. In addition, the HPV DNA detection rates offered a good correlation between cytology and biopsy. CONCLUSION: The ThinPrep Pap performed extremely well in this primary screening trial. We found a good correlation between ThinPrep cytology and colposcopic biopsy on detection of HSIL and SCC; cervical specimens collected in ThinPrep liquid buffer serve as a direct test for HPV as well.     

Bile duct brushings cytology – improving sensitivity of diagnosis using the ThinPrep® technique: a review of 113 cases

OBJECTIVE: Common bile duct (CBD) brushings have been recognized as a technique of moderate sensitivity and high specificity in identifying carcinoma of the ampulla and pancreatico-biliary regions. This study evaluated the increase in sensitivity of this technique using the ThinPrep technique of specimen preparation when compared with conventional cytology smears. METHODS: A total of 113 bile duct brushings were included in the study (38 conventional smears and 75 slides prepared using the ThinPrep technique). All slides were reviewed by one cytologist. Five categories of reporting were used: inadequate, negative, atypia, suspicious and malignant. RESULTS: The inadequate category of reporting disappeared in the ThinPrep group with improved specimen fixation and preparation and hence reduced artefact. Sensitivity of diagnosis of malignancy increased from 39% in conventional smears to 53% in the ThinPrep group. Specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were 100%, 100%, 60% and 68% for conventional smears and were 100%, 100%, 60% and 72%, respectively, for ThinPrep specimens. CONCLUSIONS: ThinPrep technique was associated with increased sensitivity of diagnosis, in part due to improved specimen fixation and reduced artefact. Cytology of bile duct brushings is an important diagnostic tool for sites from which it can be difficult to obtain a histology biopsy. It may therefore provide the only opportunity for tissue diagnosis of carcinoma from these sites, hence the importance of optimizing sensitivity.     

Use of automated primary screening on liquid-based, thin-layer preparations

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of the AutoPap System (TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) (TriPath) in screening AutoCyte PREP liquid-based, thin-layer preparations by comparing the final cytologic diagnoses with instrument slide classification results. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 9,665 AutoCyte PREP thin-layer slides were first independently screened to establish a final cytologic diagnosis (reference diagnosis). The slides were then processed on the AutoPap System. Each slide successfully processed was reported into result categories. The generated report gave a ranking score for each slide designated for "review." Slides designated "no further review" (NFR) were also listed in the report. The reported results were then compared to the reference cytologic diagnoses. RESULTS: Of 9,665 slides initially submitted to the AutoPap, 8,688 (90.8%) were qualified for scanning, and 884 (9.2%) were definitely classified as process review or rerun and excluded from the study. Of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and greater (HSIL+), 85.2% were ranked in the first rank, 12.7% in the second, one (2.1%) in the third, none in the fourth and fifth and none in the NFR category. Of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 47.4% were ranked in the first rank, 20.8% in the second, 10.6% in the third, 10.1% in the fourth, 5.3% in the fifth and 5.8% in NFR. Of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, 53.6% were ranked in the first rank, 22.5% in the second, 12.4% in the third, 5.4% in the fourth, 3.8% in the fifth and 2.3% in NFR. Considering a cutoff value at < or = 3rd rank, 84% of cervical abnormalities (RR 6.52, 95% CI 4.96-8.66) and 100% of HSIL+ were identified. CONCLUSION: The AutoPap demonstrates a high capability for detecting cervical abnormalities on AutoCyte PREP thin-layer slides. HSIL+ was associated with the highest instrument scores.     

Use of a thin-layer technique in thyroid fine needle aspiration

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of the ThinPrep Processor (Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A) in fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid gland lesions. STUDY DESIGN: This study included 459 thyroid FNA specimens obtained from patients who came to our endocrinology department with various thyroid disorders over 3 years. The cytologic material was prepared using both the conventional and ThinPrep method in the first 2 years (285 cases), while in the last one only the ThinPrep method was used (1 74 cases). The smears were stained using a modified Papanicolaou procedure and May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain. Immunocytochemistry was performed on thin-layer slides using specific monoclonal antibodies when needed. Thin-layer and direct smear diagnoses were compared with the final cytologic or histologic diagnoses, when available. RESULTS: Our cases included 279 adenomatoid nodules, 15 cases of Hashimoto thyroiditis, 45 follicular neoplasms, 14 Hürthle cell tumors, 58 papillary carcinomas and 1 5 anaplastic carcinomas. Thin-layer preparations showed a trend toward a lower proportion of inadequate specimens and a lower false negative rate. Cytomorphologic features showed some differences between the 2 methods. Colloid was less frequently observed on ThinPrep slides, while nuclear detail and micronucleoli were more easily detected with this technique. Moreover, ThinPrep appeared to be the appropriate method for the use of ancillary techniques in suspicious cases. CONCLUSION: Thin-layer cytology improves the diagnostic accuracy of thyroid FNA and offers the possibility of performing new techniques, such as immunocytochemistry, on the same sample in order to detect malignancy as well as the type and origin of thyroid gland neoplasms.     

Cell blocks from scraping of cytology smear: comparison with conventional cell block

OBJECTIVE: To compare cytomorphology preservation and immunohistochemistry results between conventional cell blocks (CCB) and cytoscrape cell blocks (SCB). STUDY DESIGN: Fine needle aspiration (FNAC) was done in 17 consecutive cases. Air-dried smears for May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain and wet-fixed smear for hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) stain were prepared. Simultaneously another pass was made in each case for preparation of material for CCB. One of the H-E-stained smears was spared for SCB. SCB was compared with CCB for cell morphology. Immunostaining was performed both cell blocks, as well as on FNA smears in 8 cases. Results were evaluated for intensity of staining and percentage of cells showing positivity. RESULTS: CCB and SCB sections showed adequate cellularity in all cases. Morphologic preservation was good in SCB sections. There was good architectural and nuclear preservation in all cases of SCB. Immunostaining results showed better and clear intensity of staining with little background in all cell block cases. CONCLUSION: SCB is a valuable technique in cell blocks from stained FNA smears. The cytomorphologic details are equally good in SCB and CCB. Additional panels of immunostaining can be done on SCB for better diagnosis and classification, particularly in cases in which repeat FNA is not possible.