Orexin-A在肥胖大鼠摄食和自由活动中的调控

目的:探讨Orexin-A对肥胖大鼠摄食和自由活动的影响。方法:雄性SD大鼠下丘脑外侧区(LH)置管,预先测量体重(BW),脂体重(FM)和瘦体重(LM),据此对大鼠分组并分别提供高脂(HF)和低脂(LF)饮食饲喂,通过置管向大鼠LH注射人工合成脑脊液(a CSF)或orexin-A(OXA)。在饲喂前后监测OXA对大鼠自发动态运动(SPA)以及摄食量,体重(BW),脂体重(FM)和瘦体重(LM)的影响,以及每日LH注射OXA是否能够抵抗高脂饮食引起的摄食诱导肥胖(DIO)。结果:高脂饮食饲喂之后,高摄食诱导肥胖(DIO)大鼠和低DIO大鼠间体重增加量(ΔBW)、摄食量和高脂饮食饲喂后的体重无差异(P0.05),但与低脂饮食组大鼠相比,上述各指标均显著增加(P0.05)。低DIO大鼠的24 h SPA和活跃期SPA显著高于高DIO大鼠(P0.05)。LH注射OXA可使严重DIO降低而轻微DIO增加,DIO程度对LH注射OXA后的SPA的影响呈非线性的。每日双侧LH注射OXA可抑制早期DIO但并不改变大鼠摄食量。LH注射OXA使大鼠SPA增加,影响能量消耗,有助于DIO抵抗。结论:Orexin-A可通过增加大鼠活动量,调控肥胖大鼠的摄食和DIO抵抗作用。     

胃动素受体激动剂红霉素对大鼠下丘脑葡萄糖反应神经元的作用

目的:通过观察胃动素受体激动剂红霉素对大鼠下丘脑中葡萄糖反应神经元电活动的影响,探讨中枢胃动素对摄食活动调控的机制.方法:应用细胞外记录神经元单位放电的方法,记录麻醉大鼠LHA及VMH的神经元电活动.左颈总动脉注射0.56 mol/L葡萄糖溶液0.2 ml鉴别GSNs及GRNs;侧脑室注射红霉素4 μg,观察其对葡萄糖反应神经元及非葡萄糖反应神经元自发放电频率的影响;侧脑室注射GM-109(胃动素受体拮抗剂)与红霉素的混合剂(1:50的比例配制),观察上述效应是否可重复出现.结果:在LHA,红霉素对GSNs有明显的兴奋作用,与其对该核团NGSNs的作用相比较,差别有统计学意义(P＜0.05);在VMH,红霉素对GRNs有明显的抑制作用,与其对该核团NGRNs的作用相比较,差别有统计学意义(P＜0.01).对红霉素有反应的神经元在给予GM-109和红霉素的混合剂后,神经元的放电频率无明显变化.结论:胃动素受体激动剂红霉素可兴奋LHA-GSNs同时抑制VMH-GRNs,这一途径可能是中枢胃动素促进摄食活动的神经调节机制之一.     

Ghrelin对大鼠摄食的影响及orexins信号通路的调控

目的:探究Ghrelin对大鼠摄食的影响及orexins信号通路的调控作用。方法:采用免疫组织化学染色的方法观察Ghrelin免疫阳性神经元轴突末梢与orexin神经元的突触联系以及下丘脑外侧区(LHA)内c-fos的表达。侧脑室注射抗-orexin-A IgG和抗-orexin-B IgG混合液、抗-黑色素浓集激素(MCH)IgG、NPY-1受体拮抗剂后测量大鼠摄食量,观察其对ghrelin诱导摄食的影响。结果:Ghrelin免疫阳性神经元轴突末梢与orexin神经元的突触相接触。侧脑室注射ghrelin可诱导orexin神经元内c-fos表达,但是没有引起MCH神经元内c-fos的表达。预先注射抗-NPY IgG抗体,ghrelin仍然可诱导orexin神经元内c-fos表达。侧脑室预先注射抗-orexin-A IgG和抗-orexin-B IgG抗体可减弱ghrelin促摄食作用,但是预先注射抗-MCH IgG抗体对ghrelin诱导的摄食作用没有明显影响。注射NPY受体拮抗剂可进一步加强抗-orexin-A IgG抗体和抗-orexin-B IgG抗体对ghrelin诱导摄食的抑制效应。结论:ghrelin可能与orexin系统相互作用共同参与摄食和能量平衡的调控。     

大鼠延髓背侧迷走复合体注射ghrelin激活弓状核神经肽Y/刺鼠色蛋白相关蛋白神经元而诱发多食(英文)

Ghrelin是生长素促分泌受体的内源性配体,刺激摄食并增加体重。已有研究证实ghrelin刺激摄食的作用靶点主要是下丘脑弓状核(hypothalamic arcuate nucleus,ARC)内的神经肽Y(neuropeptide Y,NPY)/刺鼠色蛋白相关蛋白(agouti-related peptide,AgRP)神经元。除下丘脑外,脑干尾部迷走复合体具有ghrelin受体,是ghrelin调控摄食活动的另一靶点。本实验旨在验证ghrelin作用于脑干尾部所诱发的摄食增加是否需要下丘脑NPY/AgRP神经元参与。在大鼠延髓背侧迷走复合体(dorsal vagalcomplex,DVC)微量注射20pmol的ghrelin,用摄食自动分析仪测量大鼠的摄食反应,用荧光定量PCR技术测定ARC的NPY/AgRP mRNA的表达水平,同时利用免疫组化技术测定ARC的NPY阳性神经元数量及光密度。结果显示,与对照组(DVC微量注射生理盐水)相比,ghrelin微注射组大鼠摄食量增加,其累积摄食量在注射后2h达最高峰;ARC处NPY/AgRP mRNA的表达水平、NPY免疫阳性神经元的数量及光密度也明显增加,且均在ghrelin注射后2h增高达到高峰。以上结果提示,大鼠DVC注射ghrelin可能通过上行纤维激活弓状核NPY/AgRP神经元,介导大鼠的多食反应。     

Orexin-A对高脂饮食诱导肥胖大鼠摄食和体重的影响

目的:探讨Orexin-A对高脂饮食诱导的肥胖大鼠摄食和体重的影响。方法:通过检测SD大鼠24 h动态SPA的分布情况来定义HA大鼠和LA大鼠,创建饮食诱导肥胖(DIO)大鼠模型,向HA和LA大鼠延髓外侧下丘脑(rLH)和黑质多巴胺致密部(SN))微量注射orexin-A,观察orexin-A对能量消耗、自发动态运动(SPA)的作用,以及动态SPA对饮食诱导肥胖(DIO)的抵抗作用。结果:雄性SD大鼠在标准饮食情况下,24 h动态SPA呈正偏态分布,非固定SPA(ambulatory SPA)与瘦体重(lean mass,LM)(P0.05)以及总体重(P0.05)显著相关。HA和LA大鼠(high and low activity rats)间的固有SPA(intrinsic SPA)差异有显著统计学意义(P0.05)。与LA大鼠相比,HA大鼠延髓外侧下丘脑(rLH)和黑质多巴胺致密部(SN)的orexin-A反应性更高。在r LH和SN注射orexin-A能显著增加动态SPA(r LH:P0.05;SN:P0.05)。在HA和LA大鼠的r LH注射orexin-A,每种剂量与注射相同剂量的a CSF的大鼠相比效果有显著差异。而对于SN注射OXA,只有注射高剂量OXA的HA大鼠,与对照组相比,才出现著差异。在r LH注射OXA后,对HA/LA大鼠动态SPA均有显著影响(P0.05)。HA大鼠比LA大鼠能量消耗更高。不同的饮食对于HA和LA大鼠转化为SPA有不同的影响,HA大鼠对DIO敏感性低于LA大鼠。与LA大鼠相比,在LF(Low Fat)饮食条件下,转化为脂肪量的热量更少。结论:Orexin-A可通过增加大鼠活动量,使高脂饮食诱导的肥胖大鼠体重减轻。     

下丘脑室旁核orexin-A对大鼠摄食和胃动力影响及调控机制

目的:探讨下丘脑室旁核orexin-A对大鼠摄食和胃动力影响及调控机制。方法:采用免疫组化观察下丘脑室旁核(paraventricular nucleus,PVN)orexin受体表达情况;PVN注射orexin-A观察大鼠摄食、胃运动、胃酸分泌和胃排空的改变。结果:免疫组化实验显示大鼠PVN中存在orexin受体免疫阳性细胞。PVN注射orexin-A后,大鼠前三小时摄食增加,6 h和24 h摄食无显著改变。PVN微量注射orexin-A后,大鼠胃运动幅度和频率增加、胃排空增快并且胃酸分泌增多。[D-Lys-3]-GHRP-6可部分阻断orexin-A对摄食、胃运动、胃排空和胃酸分泌的促进作用,SB334867可完全阻断orexin-A对胃运动、胃排空和胃酸分泌的促进作用。结论:下丘脑室旁核orexin-A可能通过生长激素促泌素GHSR受体信号通路调控大鼠摄食及胃功能。     

第四脑室注射orexin-A及OX1R拮抗剂对大鼠摄食及自由活动的影响

本文旨在探讨第四脑室注射orexin-A及orexin 1型受体(orexin-1 receptor,OX1R)拮抗剂SB334867对肥胖和正常大鼠摄食和自由活动的影响。采用高脂饲料诱导建立肥胖大鼠模型,分别在肥胖和正常大鼠第四脑室注射不同剂量orexin-A或SB334867,观察光照和黑暗环境下两种大鼠0~4 h摄食量及活动量的变化。结果显示,第四脑室注射不同剂量orexin-A,光照条件下,正常和肥胖大鼠0~4 h摄食量和活动量均较生理盐水对照组明显增加,呈剂量依赖关系(P0.05~0.01);且肥胖大鼠摄食量和活动量显著高于正常大鼠;黑暗条件下,不同剂量的orexin-A对正常和肥胖大鼠摄食量和活动量均没有明显改变(P0.05)。第四脑室注射不同剂量SB334867,光照条件下,正常和肥胖大鼠0~2 h,2~4 h摄食量和活动量均较生理盐水对照组明显减少(P0.05);且肥胖大鼠摄食量和活动量均显著高于正常大鼠;黑暗条件下,正常和肥胖大鼠摄食量和活动量均没有明显改变(P0.05)。以上结果提示,第四脑室周核团可能是orexin-A及OX1R作用靶点之一;光照条件对orexin-A和OX1R生理功能的发挥可能具有重要影响。     

下丘脑Nesfatin-1抑食效应及机制研究

目的:探讨下丘脑nesfatin-1与组胺信号通路间的相互作用及对摄食的影响。方法:采用第三脑室置管、药物注射、免疫组化、ELISA等方法,观察氟甲基组氨酸(FMH)、α螺旋促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素(CRH)和促甲状腺激素释放激素(TRH)对Nesfatin-1诱导的抑制摄食的影响,以及Nesfatin-1与组胺信号通路相互影响调控摄食机制。结果:第三脑室注射nesfatin-1可显著减少大鼠摄食量,而第三脑室内预先注射FMH,nesfatin-1抑制摄食效应明显减弱,但FMH本身并不影响大鼠夜间摄食量。第三脑室注射nesfatin-1,可显著增加优降宁诱发的PVN、腹内侧核(VMH)、结节乳头核(TMN)内t-MH的积累;但腹腔注射nesfatin-1没有引起大鼠摄食改变,t-MH蓄积也无显著变化。第三脑室注射α螺旋CRH或抗TRH血清均可显著减弱nesfatin-1的抑食效应,而α螺旋CRH、抗TRH血清本身并不显著影响大鼠摄食量。第三脑室注射nesfatin-1可显著增加下丘脑PVN内CRH和TRH水平,且nesfatin-1可显著增加优降宁诱导的PVN、VMH和TMN内t-MH的表达,而α螺旋CRH或抗TRH血清可显著抑制nesfatin-1诱导的PVN、VMH和TMH内t-MH的蓄积。第三脑室注射组胺可显著增加大鼠下丘脑PVN内nesfatin-1含量,但LH、VMH、TMN以及血浆内nesfatin-1水平无显著改变。免疫组化研究显示,PVN内有nesfatin-1和H1-R免疫反应阳性神经元,且部分神经元共存。结论:Nesfatin-1的抑食效应可能与下丘脑组胺信号通路介导。     

Ghrelin对糖尿病大鼠下丘脑弓状核胃扩张敏感神经元和胃运动的影响

目的:探讨Ghrelin对糖尿病大鼠下丘脑弓状核胃扩张敏感神经元和胃运动的影响。方法:逆行追踪结合免疫组化观察ARC中GHSR-1的表达,细胞外放电记录,观察ghrelin对GD神经元放电活动的影响及电刺激ARC对GD神经元放电活动和胃运动的影响。结果:电生理实验结果表明,在ARC Ghrelin能够能激发GD兴奋性神经元(GD-E)和GD抑制性神经元(GD-I)。然而,ghrelin可以兴奋更少的GD-E神经元,在正常大鼠中ghrelin对于GD-E的兴奋作用比在DM大鼠中的作用弱。在体胃运动研究表明,在ARC中微量注射ghrelin可以明显的增强胃运动,并且呈现剂量依赖关系。Ghrelin在糖尿病大鼠促胃动力作用低于正常大鼠。Ghrelin诱导的效应可被生长激素促分泌素受体(GHSR)拮抗剂阻断[d-lys-3]-GHRP-6或bim28163。放射免疫法和实时荧光定量PCR数据表明胃血浆ghrelin水平,在ARC ghrelin mRNA的表达水平先上升后下降,糖尿病大鼠(DM)中,在ARC中GHSR-1a mRNA表达保持在一个比较低的水平。结论:ghrelin可以调节GD敏感神经元以及胃运动,通过ARC中ghrelin受体。在糖尿病大鼠中,Ghrelin促进胃运动作用减弱可能与ARC中ghrelin受体表达减少有关。     

侧脑室微量注射大麻素受体拮抗剂对orexin-A诱导大鼠能量代谢改变的影响及潜在机制研究

目的:探讨大麻素1型受体(CB1)抑制剂利莫那班对下丘脑外侧区(LHA)微量注射orexin-A诱导的小鼠能量代谢及相关行为变化改变的影响。方法:通过侧脑室微量注射(icv)利莫那班,同时LHA微量注射orexin-A,测量小鼠能量代谢、自主运动的变化,杏仁核(CeA)内多巴胺释放能力以及小鼠摄食量的变化。结果:侧脑室微量注射利莫那班可减弱因LHA微量注射orexin-A引起的小鼠能量代谢变化,降低小鼠自主运动,并且减弱小鼠CeA内多巴胺释放能力。注射(icv)利莫那班未改变LHA微量注射orexin-A所诱导的摄食量增多。此外,LHA双侧注射利莫那班可阻断LHA内注射orexin-A对运动活性的促进作用,但不影响小鼠的摄食量。结论:大麻素受体涉及orexin-A诱导的小鼠中脑边缘系统多巴胺系统活化的调控,对能量代谢及自主运动也有影响,但对食物摄入的调节无明显影响。     

Abnormalities of leptin and ghrelin regulation in obesity-prone juvenile rats

Rats selectively bred to develop diet-induced obesity (DIO) spontaneously gain more body weight between 5 and 7 wk of age than do those bred to be diet resistant (DR). Here, chow-fed DIO rats ate 9% more and gained 19% more body weight from 5 to 6 wk of age than did DR rats but had comparable leptin and insulin levels. However, 6-wk-old DIO rats had 29% lower plasma ghrelin levels at dark onset but equivalent levels 6 h later compared with DR rats. When subsequently fed a high-energy (HE; 31% fat) diet for 10 days, DIO rats ate 70% more, gained more body and adipose depot weight, had higher leptin and insulin levels, and had 22% lower feed efficiency than DR rats fed HE diet. In DIO rats on HE diet, leptin levels increased significantly at 3 days followed by increased insulin levels at 7 days. These altered DIO leptin and ghrelin responses were associated with 10% lower leptin receptor mRNA expression in the arcuate (ARC), dorsomedial (DMN), and ventromedial hypothalamic nuclei and 13 and 15% lower ghrelin receptor (GHS-R) mRNA expression in the ARC and DMN than in the DR rats. These data suggest that increased ghrelin signaling is not a proximate cause of DIO, whereas reduced leptin sensitivity might play a causal role.     

Slower gastric emptying in high-fat diet induced obese rats is associated with attenuated plasma ghrelin and elevated plasma leptin and cholecystokinin concentrations

Gastrointestinal (GI) motility and gut hormones have been considered to be involved in the development and maintenance of obesity. Our aim was to assess the relationships between gastric emptying (GE), GI transit and gut hormones and leptin concentrations in diet-induced obese rat model. Male 6-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats were fed with a high-fat (HF) diet for 8weeks to generate diet-induced obesity (DIO) and diet resistant (DR) rats. GE, GI transit and plasma ghrelin, cholecystokinin (CCK), PYY and leptin concentrations were determined in DIO, DR and control (CON) rats. The DIO rats had slower GE, higher plasma leptin and CCK concentrations, and lower plasma ghrelin concentration compared with CON and DR rats. GE was correlated with plasma ghrelin (r=0.402, P=0.028), CCK (r=-0.518, P=0.003) and leptin concentration (r=-0.514, P=0.004). The slower GE, which can be considered as an adaptive response aimed at HF diet induced obesity, may be mediated by changes of plasma ghrelin, CCK and leptin concentrations.     

Ventromedial Hypothalamic NPY Y2 Receptor in the Maintenance of Body Weight in Diet-Induced Obesity in Mice

This study examined changes in neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y2 receptor binding in the brains of C57BL/6 mice in response to different levels of high-fat diets via three dietary intervention methods: high-fat diet, switching from high- to low-fat diet and finally, energy restricted high-fat diet. Forty-five C57Bl/6 male mice were fed a high-fat diet for 8 weeks and then classified as diet-induced obese (DIO) or diet-resistant (DR) mice according to the highest and lowest body weight gainers, respectively. The DIO and DR mice were then randomly divided into three groups each and either continued on their high-fat diet ad libitum (DIO-H and DR-H), changed to a low-fat diet (DIO-L and DR-L) or pair-fed via energy restricted high-fat diet (DIO-P and DR-P) for a further 6 weeks. During the course of this study, body weight, energy intake and plasma peptide YY (PYY) were measured. The study revealed that the replacement of a high-fat diet with a low-fat diet was associated with a significant lowering of ventromedial hypothalamic (VMH) Y2 receptor binding in both the DIO-L and DR-L mice (−37%, −36%), and also a lowered plasma PYY level in the DIO-L mice (−25%). Despite a continued consumption of the high-fat diet, energy restricted pair feeding caused a lower VMH Y2 receptor binding in the obese mice (DIO-P) following weight loss compared to the DR-P mice (−14%). In conclusion, this study showed that changing diets from high- to low-fat can significantly lower the VMH Y2 receptor binding irrespective to the obesity phenotype. Energy restriction, even while on high-fat feeding, can cause a lower VMH Y2 receptor binding compared to DR mice even after body weight loss to similar levels. This suggests either a possible intrinsic nature of the DIO mice or a body weight set-point re-establishment to drive body weight regain.     

Elevated hypothalamic orexin signaling, sensitivity to orexin A, and spontaneous physical activity in obesity-resistant rats

Selectively-bred obesity-resistant [diet resistant (DR)] rats weigh less than obesity-prone [diet-induced obese (DIO)] rats, despite comparable daily caloric intake, suggesting phenotypic energy expenditure differences. Human data suggest that obesity is maintained by reduced ambulatory or spontaneous physical activity (SPA). The neuropeptide orexin A robustly stimulates SPA. We hypothesized that DR rats have greater: 1) basal SPA, 2) orexin A-induced SPA, and 3) preproorexin, orexin 1 and 2 receptor (OX1R and OX2R) mRNA, compared with DIO rats. A group of age-matched out-bred Sprague-Dawley rats were used as additional controls for the behavioral studies. DIO, DR, and Sprague-Dawley rats with dorsal-rostral lateral hypothalamic (rLHa) cannulas were injected with orexin A (0, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 pmol/0.5 microl). SPA and food intake were measured for 2 h after injection. Preproorexin, OX1R and OX2R mRNA in the rLHa, and whole hypothalamus were measured by real-time RT-PCR. Orexin A significantly stimulated feeding in all rats. Orexin A-induced SPA was significantly greater in DR and Sprague-Dawley rats than in DIO rats. Two-mo-old DR rats had significantly greater rLHa OX1R and OX2R mRNA than DIO rats but comparable preproorexin levels. Eight-mo-old DR rats had elevated OX1R and OX2R mRNA compared with DIO rats, although this increase was significant for OX2R only at this age. Thus DR rats show elevated basal and orexin A-induced SPA associated with increased OX1R and OX2R gene expression, suggesting that differences in orexin A signaling through OX1R and OX2R may mediate DIO and DR phenotypes.     

Meal Pattern Analysis of Diet‐Induced Obesity in Susceptible and Resistant Rats

Objective: To characterize the meal patterns of free feeding Sprague‐Dawley rats that become obese or resist obesity when chronically fed a high‐fat diet. Research Methods and Procedures: Male Sprague‐Dawley rats (N = 120) were weaned onto a high‐fat diet, and body weight was monitored for 19 weeks. Rats from the upper [diet‐induced obese (DIO)] and lower [diet‐resistant (DR)] deciles for body‐weight gain were selected for study. A cohort of chow‐fed (CF) rats weight‐matched to the DR group was also studied. Food intake was continuously monitored for 7 consecutive days using a BioDAQ food intake monitoring system. Results: DIO rats were obese, hyperphagic, hyperleptinemic, hyperinsulinemic, hyperglycemic, and hypertriglyceridemic relative to the DR and CF rats. The hyperphagia of DIOs was caused by an increase in meal size, not number. CF rats ate more calories than DR rats; however, this was because of an increase in meal number, not size. When expressed as a function of lean mass, CF and DR rats consumed the same amount of calories. The intermeal intervals of DIO and DR rats were similar; both were longer than CF rats. The nocturnal satiety ratio of DIO rats was significantly lower than DR and CF rats. The proportion of calories eaten during the nocturnal period did not differ among groups. Discussion: The hyperphagia of a Sprague‐Dawley rat model of chronic diet‐induced obesity is caused by an increase in meal size, not number. These results are an important step toward understanding the mechanisms underlying differences in feeding behavior of DIO and DR rats.     

Expression of dopaminergic receptors in the hypothalamus of lean and obese Zucker rats and food intake

As revealed by previous microdialysis studies, basal and food intake-accompanied dopamine release significantly differs in the hypothalamus of obese vs. lean Zucker rats. In the present study, we determined whether dopaminergic receptors are also compromised in obesity. Dopaminergic D(1) and D(2) receptor mRNA expression was studied in the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH), lateral hypothalamic area (LHA), and the adenohypophysis (AH) of obese and lean Zucker rats using RT-PCR technique. In obese Zucker rats, we found an upregulation of D(1) receptor mRNA in the VMH and AH and a downregulation in the LHA, whereas D(2) receptor mRNA was downregulated in both the VMH and LHA, but not changed in the AH, compared with lean rats. Also, an increase of D(1) receptor staining was seen in the paraventricular nucleus of obese rats by immunohistochemistry. We selected the VMH to test if the observed changes in the dopamine receptor expression of obese rats induce behavioral sensitization to dopamine as expressed by hyperphagia. The overnight food-deprived rats received a single VMH injection (10 nmol) of sulpiride (D(2) receptor antagonist) or saline as control, then food was provided and 1-h food intake was measured. Food intake after sulpiride vs. saline injection was greater in obese rats but was not different in lean rats. Our data suggest that downregulation of D(2) receptor in the hypothalamus at least in the VMH induces behavior sensitization for having large meals. Low D(2) receptor expression may be causal for an exaggerated dopamine release observed in obese rats during food ingestion and for reduced satiety feedback effect of dopamine. High level of D(1) receptor expression in the VMH and low in the LHA may also contribute to the specific feeding pattern in obese rats represented by large meal size and low meal number.     

Effects of stimulation of hypothalamic “feeding areas” on endocrines and metabolism in normal and diabetic monkeys

Electrical stimulation of hypothalamic “feeding areas” (VMH & LHA) through stereotaxically implanted electrodes was carried out in normal and streptozotocinized diabetic conscious male rhesus monkeys. In normal monkeys, the VMH stimulation resulted in a significant decrease in serum insulin and blood glucose while opposite responses were observed following LHA stimulation. Serum growth hormone, FFA and plasma cortisol levels increased significantly on stimulation of LHA and VMH in normal animals. The pattern of blood glucose and serum growth hormone responses to stimulation of “feeding areas” was similar in normal and diabetic animals. The serum insulin, FFA and plasma cortisol were largely unaffected while growth hormone increased significantly by stimulation of these areas in diabetes. The present study indicates that the stimulation of “feeding areas” does not alter the diabetic syndrome significantly nor does diabetes prevent the changes in metabolism seen after stimulation of “feeding areas.”