丙酮酸对细胞寒冷应激损伤的保护作用研究

目的:细胞冻存、移植器官保存过程中,机体细胞会产生细胞寒冷应激过程,导致细胞产生损伤作用,而其作用机制尚不清楚,本研究通过观察4℃冷暴露对HEK293细胞增殖活性及凋亡的影响,分析线粒体分裂蛋白Drp1在此过程中的表达变化,阐明Drp1在细胞寒冷应激中作用及其机制.方法:采用MTT法观察4℃环境暴露对HEK293细胞损伤的影响,流式细胞术检测细胞凋亡;Western blot方法检测蛋白Drp1、Bcl2表达水平变化,提取线粒体观察线粒体中Drp1表达水平.结果:4℃冷暴露抑制HEK293细胞增殖(P＜0.05),Drp1线粒体表达水平增高,并向线粒体转位;丙酮酸可以逆转4℃冷暴露对细胞增值抑制,抑制Drp1线粒体表达水平增高,并向线粒体转位,增加细胞中Bcl2表达水平.结论:研究发现细胞寒冷应激可以使细胞凋亡,细胞增殖出现显著抑制,而寒冷应激引起细胞Drp1的线粒体转位,丙酮酸干预后可以对细胞起到保护作用,研究发现丙酮酸可以逆转Drp1的线粒体转位过程,增加Bcl2表达水平,可能是其产生保护作用的机制之一.     

线粒体动力相关蛋白Drp1与心肌缺血再灌注损伤机制的研究进展

线粒体动力相关蛋白(dynamin-related protein 1,Drp1)是介导线粒体分裂的主要蛋白,Drp1表达增加,线粒体分裂增加,网状结构破坏,反之则有助线粒体融合,促进损伤线粒体修复。心肌缺血再灌注损伤与活性氧(ROS)的大量产生,线粒体通透性转换孔(MPTP)的开放及细胞凋亡等密切相关。近年来大量研究发现Drp1介导的线粒体分裂参与心肌缺血再灌注损伤,本文就Drp1参与心肌缺血再灌注损伤的相关机制作一简要综述。     

线粒体动力学在糖尿病心肌病中的作用及调节机制

心血管并发症是糖尿病患者死亡的首要原因。其中,糖尿病心肌病是排除了高血压、冠心病所致的心肌损伤后的一类特异性心肌病,其特征在于心肌细胞的代谢异常和心脏功能的逐渐衰退,临床表现为早期心肌舒张功能受损,晚期心肌收缩功能受损,最终发展为心力衰竭。线粒体是心肌细胞内提供能量的主要细胞器,线粒体动力学是指线粒体进行融合和分裂的动态过程,是线粒体质量控制的重要途径,线粒体动力学在维持线粒体稳态与心脏功能中起着至关重要的作用。调节线粒体分裂的蛋白主要是Drp1及其受体Fis1、MFF、MiD49和MiD51,执行线粒体外膜融合的蛋白为Mfn1/2,内膜融合蛋白为Opa1。本文综述了近期在糖尿病心肌病线粒体动力学方面的系列研究成果：1型与2型糖尿病心肌病的线粒体动力学失衡均表现为分裂增加与融合受阻,前者的分子机制主要是Drp1上调与Opa1下调,后者的分子机制主要为Drp1上调与Mfn1/2下调,线粒体分裂增加和融合受阻可导致线粒体功能障碍,促进糖尿病心肌病的发生、发展。中药单体安石榴苷、丹皮酚和内源性物质褪黑素等活性成分可通过抑制线粒体分裂或促进线粒体融合,改善线粒体功能,减轻糖尿病心肌病症状。本文...     

心力衰竭大鼠心肌线粒体蛋白质组学研究

通过差速离心分离大鼠心肌线粒体,利用蛋白质组学技术构建正常大鼠心肌线粒体蛋白质组表达图谱;选用心肌梗死诱导的心力衰竭大鼠模型,分析比较心力衰竭时心肌线粒体蛋白质表达谱的改变.与正常对照组相比,心力衰竭大鼠心肌线粒体共有188个蛋白点的表达量发生了变化,其中有120个蛋白点表达上调2倍以上,有68个蛋白点表达下调1/2以上（P〈0.05）.对差异表达的蛋白点行胶内酶解后质谱鉴定和数据库检索,对蛋白质进行功能注释、亚细胞定位和生物信息学分析,其中有27个蛋白质涉及能量代谢和氧化应激,其中参与糖酵解及三羧酸循环的蛋白质（酶）表达上调,而参与OXPHOS复合体和脂肪酸代谢的蛋白质（酶）表达下调.研究结果表明,心力衰竭时心肌能量代谢模式发生了改变,底物选择从倾向于脂肪酸转为葡萄糖利用增加,糖酵解增强而脂肪酸氧化能力减低;为心肌缺血性损伤时线粒体结构和功能改变提供了分子依据,在蛋白质水平上阐述了线粒体在心力衰竭发展中的可能机制.     

线粒体分裂抑制剂Mdivi-1改善血管紧张素Ⅱ介导的内皮功能紊乱（英文）

动力相关蛋白(dynamin-related protein 1,Drp1)与线粒体的动态变化有着密切的联系,是介导线粒体分裂的主要功能蛋白。本研究旨在探讨血管紧张素II(angiotensin II,Ang II)对血管内皮细胞线粒体融合和分裂的影响以及Drp1功能抑制剂Mdivi-1对Ang II介导的内皮损伤是否有减轻作用。Ang II或联合Drp1抑制剂Mdivi-1处理人脐静脉内皮细胞(human umbilical vascular endothelial cells,HUVECs)后,用Western blot检测Drp1、e NOS和凋亡相关酶的蛋白表达,用Mito Tracker Red染色观察细胞内线粒体形态,用JC-1探针染色检测线粒体膜电位变化,用DCFH-DA染色检测细胞活性氧簇(reactive oxygen species,ROS)生成,用Transwell实验检测细胞迁移情况,用Annexin V/PI染色检测细胞凋亡情况。结果显示,Ang II处理12 h后,HUVECs的Drp1的表达水平显著升高,内皮细胞迁移、凋亡及ROS的生成显著增加,e NOS表达量显著降低;同时,Ang II处理还诱导了线粒体形态的改变,使网状的线粒体变成了短管状,并伴随着线粒体膜电位的下降。Mdivi-1可以显著逆转Ang II对内皮功能的上述损伤作用,提高内皮细胞线粒体膜电位及e NOS的表达量,降低细胞内ROS水平,抑制内皮细胞凋亡及迁移能力。以上结果提示,Drp1抑制剂Mdivi-1可以减轻Ang II介导的内皮损伤。     

膜蛋白ATAD3A在线粒体质量控制中的作用

线粒体质量控制对于线粒体网络的稳态和线粒体功能的正常发挥具有重要意义。三磷酸腺苷酶家族蛋白3A(ATAD3A)是同时参与调节线粒体结构功能、线粒体动力学和线粒体自噬等重要生物学过程的线粒体膜蛋白之一。近期研究表明,ATAD3A既可与Mic60/Mitofilin和线粒体转录因子A (TFAM)等因子相互作用以维持线粒体嵴的形态和氧化磷酸化功能,又能与发动蛋白相关蛋白1 (Drp1)结合而正性/负性调节线粒体分裂,还可作为线粒体外膜转位酶（TOM）复合物和线粒体内膜转位酶（TIM）复合物之间的桥接因子而介导PTEN诱导激酶（PINK1）输入线粒体进行加工,显示出促自噬或抗自噬活性。本文对ATAD3A在调控线粒体质量控制中的作用及其机制进行了综述。     

人线粒体tRNALeu(UUR)基因氧化损伤与修复研究

人mtDNA比核DNA更易受到自由基的氧化损伤,这些损伤可以被线粒体内的DNA修复机制所修复,损伤与修复是决定突变是否产生的两个重要因素.为了确定氧化损伤与损伤后修复对mtDNA突变的具体影响,采用四氧嘧啶处理LO2细胞,这种试剂进入细胞后,经氧化还原反应生成的自由基与线粒体自身代谢产生的自由基类似,然后观察自由基对细胞mtDNA的氧化损伤与损伤后DNA修复的动力学变化.由于线粒体的正常功能为修复机制所必需,采用MTT细胞活力实验检测不同浓度四氧嘧啶处理下线粒体酶活力,发现9 mmol/L四氧嘧啶培养细胞1h后,线粒体琥珀酸脱氢酶功能在撤去药物后0,2,8和24 h时间点均无明显变化.提取各组细胞的mtDNA,用EndoⅢ和Fgp两种酶切除受氧化损伤的核苷酸,然后用碱性琼脂糖凝胶电泳分离大小不等的mtDNA,进行DNA印迹实验,地高辛-抗体-碱性磷酸酶系统显色,检测完整与断裂的mtDNA量,利用Poisson公式(s=-lnP0/P,P0为未断裂链光密度值,P为所有链光密度值总和)计算一个mtDNA分子的平均损伤频率,结果显示,9 mmol/L四氧嘧啶处理细胞1 h,链平均损伤频率由对照的0.11个/分子增加至5.60个/分子,明显增加了mtDNA上核苷酸的氧化损伤,除去药物后8 h,绝大部分损伤可被修复,损伤频率减至0.40个/分子,除去药物后24h核苷酸的氧化损伤恢复至正常水平.采用接头介导PCR(LM-PCR)检测MTTL1基因区域内单个核苷酸的损伤与修复动力学.这种方法可以检测各组mtDNA上MTTL1基因75 bp区域内单个核苷酸损伤的部位及频率.结果显示,人MTTL1基因存在20个易受氧化损伤的核苷酸热点,经与相应区域内文献报道的16个突变热点比较,有12个热点部位重合,而修复未显示热点部位或区域.结果提示,自由基对核苷酸的选择性氧化损伤是决定mtDNA点突变发生及发生部位的主要原因.     

有氧运动改善AD模型APP/PS1双转基因小鼠中枢神经元线粒体融合分裂动态平衡

线粒体融合分裂平衡是线粒体动力学的需要。本研究观察12周规律有氧运动对APP/PS1双转基因小鼠中枢神经元线粒体融合分裂动态平衡的影响。本研究采用3月龄雄性APP/PS1小鼠（AD模型）随机分为AD安静组（AS）、AD运动组（AE）,同月龄雄性C57BL/6J小鼠做正常对照组（CS）。AE组进行12周规律跑台运动,5 d/周,60 min/d。前10 min运动速度12 m/min,后50 min运动速度15 m/min,跑台坡度为0°。八臂迷宫实验检测小鼠工作记忆错误频率和参考记忆错误频率;Western印迹检测小鼠皮层、海马组织中线粒体分裂蛋白Drp1和Fis1的含量,以及Drp1的活性（p-Drp1-Ser616）、线粒体融合蛋白Mfn1、Mfn2、Opa1的表达水平;透射电镜观察皮层、海马线粒体形态结构、健康线粒体比率及线粒体平均直径。本研究证实AS组较CS组工作记忆错误频率显著提高（P<0.05）,12周有氧运动显著降低工作记忆错误频率（P<0.05）。AS组小鼠皮层Fis1蛋白和海马脑区Drp1、Fis1蛋白表达水平及皮层、海马脑区Drp1蛋白的活性增加（P<0.05）。而皮层Mfn1和海马Mfn1、Mfn2蛋白表达水平显著降低（P<0.05）。12周有氧运动显著减低Fis1、Drp1蛋白表达及Drp1蛋白的活性,提高Mfn1、Mfn2蛋白表达水平（P<0.05）。AS组小鼠皮层、海马线粒体多呈现球形,部分线粒体膜结构消失,线粒体嵴结构紊乱。且AS组较CS组小鼠健康线粒体比率降低、直径缩短。12周规律有氧运动可明显改善线粒体形态和结构,提高健康线粒体比率及直径。本研究提示,12周规律有氧运动可有效抑制皮层、海马脑区线粒体分裂蛋白Drp1和 Fis1的表达,降低Drp1的活性（p-Drp1-Ser616）,上调线粒体融合蛋白Mfn1、Mfn2的蛋白表达水平,改善线粒体形态和结构以促进线粒体质量控制,是有氧运动改善AD模型空间学习记忆能力的分子机制之一。     

线粒体蛋白质组及蛋白质量控制

线粒体是哺乳动物细胞内重要细胞器,不仅通过氧化磷酸化产生ATP为细胞提供能量,也参与调节钙离子稳态、活性氧(reactive oxygen species,ROS)的产生、细胞应激反应和细胞死亡等过程,其功能障碍不仅导致多种人类疾病的发生,而且也能降低动物卵母细胞质量和早期胚胎发育能力。大量证据表明,线粒体的功能依赖于线粒体蛋白质组完整性和稳态。基于此,该文综述了线粒体蛋白组、线粒体蛋白转运,聚焦蛋白酶、分子伴侣、线粒体囊泡、线粒体自噬和线粒体未折叠蛋白反应在帮助正确的蛋白质折叠,去除错误折叠或聚集的蛋白质和清除功能失调的线粒体方面的作用,为调控线粒体蛋白质量,从而维持线粒体健康、降低疾病发生提供理论依据。     

染料木素对铅诱导的PC12 细胞毒性的抑制效应研究

目的:探讨染料木素对铅诱导的细胞毒性的影响。方法:PC12细胞分为对照组、染铅组、染料木素组以及铅加染料木素组;MTT实验检测细胞活力的改变,流式细胞仪检测细胞凋亡水平的变化,荧光探针检测线粒体形态的改变,Western blot方法检测线粒体融合分裂相关蛋白表达水平的变化。结果:铅可诱导PC12细胞活力的下降以及细胞凋亡率的显著增高,染料木素可抑制铅的这些毒性效应。与此同时,铅可诱导线粒体形态的损伤性改变,线粒体融合减少,分裂增多;而加入染料木素之后,线粒体损伤程度显著下降,线粒体分裂减少,融合增多。此外,线粒体融合相关蛋白Mfn2的水平在铅暴露后显著下降,而线粒体分裂相关蛋白Drp1的水平在铅暴露后显著升高,染料木素干预后均有所恢复。结论:染料木素可抑制铅诱导的PC12细胞毒性,其作用可能与其对线粒体融合分裂过程的干预有关。     

Mff is an essential factor for mitochondrial recruitment of Drp1 during mitochondrial fission in mammalian cells

The cytoplasmic dynamin-related guanosine triphosphatase Drp1 is recruited to mitochondria and mediates mitochondrial fission. Although the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) protein Fis1 is thought to be a Drp1 receptor, this has not been confirmed. To analyze the mechanism of Drp1 recruitment, we manipulated the expression of mitochondrial fission and fusion proteins and demonstrated that (a) mitochondrial fission factor (Mff) knockdown released the Drp1 foci from the MOM accompanied by network extension, whereas Mff overexpression stimulated mitochondrial recruitment of Drp1 accompanied by mitochondrial fission; (b) Mff-dependent mitochondrial fission proceeded independent of Fis1; (c) a Mff mutant with the plasma membrane-targeted CAAX motif directed Drp1 to the target membrane; (d) Mff and Drp1 physically interacted in vitro and in vivo; (e) exogenous stimuli-induced mitochondrial fission and apoptosis were compromised by knockdown of Drp1 and Mff but not Fis1; and (f) conditional knockout of Fis1 in colon carcinoma cells revealed that it is dispensable for mitochondrial fission. Thus, Mff functions as an essential factor in mitochondrial recruitment of Drp1.     

Fis1, Mff,MiD49, and MiD51 mediate Drp1 recruitment in mitochondrial fission

Several mitochondrial outer membrane proteins—mitochondrial fission protein 1 (Fis1), mitochondrial fission factor (Mff), mitochondrial dynamics proteins of 49 and 51 kDa (MiD49 and MiD51, respectively)—have been proposed to promote mitochondrial fission by recruiting the GTPase dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), but fundamental issues remain concerning their function. A recent study supported such a role for Mff but not for Fis1. In addition, it is unclear whether MiD49 and MiD51 activate or inhibit fission, because their overexpression causes extensive mitochondrial elongation. It is also unknown whether these proteins can act in the absence of one another to mediate fission. Using Fis1-null, Mff-null, and Fis1/Mff-null cells, we show that both Fis1 and Mff have roles in mitochondrial fission. Moreover, immunofluorescence analysis of Drp1 suggests that Fis1 and Mff are important for the number and size of Drp1 puncta on mitochondria. Finally, we find that either MiD49 or MiD51 can mediate Drp1 recruitment and mitochondrial fission in the absence of Fis1 and Mff. These results demonstrate that multiple receptors can recruit Drp1 to mediate mitochondrial fission.     

Adaptor Proteins MiD49 and MiD51 Can Act Independently of Mff and Fis1 in Drp1 Recruitment and Are Specific for Mitochondrial Fission

Drp1 (dynamin-related protein 1) is recruited to both mitochondrial and peroxisomal membranes to execute fission. Fis1 and Mff are Drp1 receptor/effector proteins of mitochondria and peroxisomes. Recently, MiD49 and MiD51 were also shown to recruit Drp1 to the mitochondrial surface; however, different reports have ascribed opposing roles in fission and fusion. Here, we show that MiD49 or MiD51 overexpression blocked fission by acting in a dominant-negative manner by sequestering Drp1 specifically at mitochondria, causing unopposed fusion events at mitochondria along with elongation of peroxisomes. Mitochondrial elongation caused by MiD49/51 overexpression required the action of fusion mediators mitofusins 1 and 2. Furthermore, at low level overexpression when MiD49 and MiD51 form discrete foci at mitochondria, mitochondrial fission events still occurred. Unlike Fis1 and Mff, MiD49 and MiD51 were not targeted to the peroxisomal surface, suggesting that they specifically act to facilitate Drp1-directed fission at mitochondria. Moreover, when MiD49 or MiD51 was targeted to the surface of peroxisomes or lysosomes, Drp1 was specifically recruited to these organelles. Moreover, the Drp1 recruitment activity of MiD49/51 appeared stronger than that of Mff or Fis1. We conclude that MiD49 and MiD51 can act independently of Mff and Fis1 in Drp1 recruitment and suggest that they provide specificity to the division of mitochondria.     

Mutations in Fis1 disrupt orderly disposal of defective mitochondria

Mitochondrial fission is mediated by the dynamin-related protein Drp1 in metazoans. Drp1 is recruited from the cytosol to mitochondria by the mitochondrial outer membrane protein Mff. A second mitochondrial outer membrane protein, named Fis1, was previously proposed as recruitment factor, but Fis1^−/− cells have mild or no mitochondrial fission defects. Here we show that Fis1 is nevertheless part of the mitochondrial fission complex in metazoan cells. During the fission cycle, Drp1 first binds to Mff on the surface of mitochondria, followed by entry into a complex that includes Fis1 and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) proteins at the ER–mitochondrial interface. Mutations in Fis1 do not normally affect fission, but they can disrupt downstream degradation events when specific mitochondrial toxins are used to induce fission. The disruptions caused by mutations in Fis1 lead to an accumulation of large LC3 aggregates. We conclude that Fis1 can act in sequence with Mff at the ER–mitochondrial interface to couple stress-induced mitochondrial fission with downstream degradation processes.     

Mff oligomerization is required for Drp1 activation and synergy with actin filaments during mitochondrial division

Mitochondrial division is an important cellular process in both normal and pathological conditions. The dynamin GTPase Drp1 is a central mitochondrial division protein, driving constriction of the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM). In mammals, the OMM protein mitochondrial fission factor (Mff) is a key receptor for recruiting Drp1 from the cytosol to the mitochondrion. Actin filaments are also important in Drp1 recruitment and activation. The manner in which Mff and actin work together in Drp1 activation is unknown. Here we show that Mff is an oligomer (most likely a trimer) that dynamically associates and disassociates through its C-terminal coiled coil, with a K_d in the range of 10 µM. Dynamic Mff oligomerization is required for Drp1 activation. While not binding Mff directly, actin filaments enhance Mff-mediated Drp1 activation by lowering the effective Mff concentration 10-fold. Total internal reflection microscopy assays using purified proteins show that Mff interacts with Drp1 on actin filaments in a manner dependent on Mff oligomerization. In U2OS cells, oligomerization-defective Mff does not effectively rescue three defects in Mff knockout cells: mitochondrial division, mitochondrial Drp1 recruitment, and peroxisome division. The ability of Mff to assemble into puncta on mitochondria depends on its oligomerization, as well as on actin filaments and Drp1.     

Dynamin-related Protein 1 Oligomerization in Solution Impairs Functional Interactions with Membrane-anchored Mitochondrial Fission Factor

Mitochondrial fission is a crucial cellular process mediated by the mechanoenzymatic GTPase, dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1). During mitochondrial division, Drp1 is recruited from the cytosol to the outer mitochondrial membrane by one, or several, integral membrane proteins. One such Drp1 partner protein, mitochondrial fission factor (Mff), is essential for mitochondrial division, but its mechanism of action remains unexplored. Previous studies have been limited by a weak interaction between Drp1 and Mff in vitro. Through refined in vitro reconstitution approaches and multiple independent assays, we show that removal of the regulatory variable domain (VD) in Drp1 enhances formation of a functional Drp1-Mff copolymer. This protein assembly exhibits greatly stimulated cooperative GTPase activity in solution. Moreover, when Mff was anchored to a lipid template, to mimic a more physiologic environment, significant stimulation of GTPase activity was observed with both WT and ΔVD Drp1. Contrary to recent findings, we show that premature Drp1 self-assembly in solution impairs functional interactions with membrane-anchored Mff. Instead, dimeric Drp1 species are selectively recruited by Mff to initiate assembly of a functional fission complex. Correspondingly, we also found that the coiled-coil motif in Mff is not essential for Drp1 interactions, but rather serves to augment cooperative self-assembly of Drp1 proximal to the membrane. Taken together, our findings provide a mechanism wherein the multimeric states of both Mff and Drp1 regulate their collaborative interaction.     

The novel tail-anchored membrane protein Mff controls mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission in mammalian cells

Few components of the mitochondrial fission machinery are known, even though mitochondrial fission is a complex process of vital importance for cell growth and survival. Here, we describe a novel protein that controls mitochondrial fission. This protein was identified in a small interfering RNA (siRNA) screen using Drosophila cells. The human homologue of this protein was named Mitochondrial fission factor (Mff). Mitochondria of cells transfected with Mff siRNA form a closed network similar to the mitochondrial networks formed when cells are transfected with siRNA for two established fission proteins, Drp1 and Fis1. Like Drp1 and Fis1 siRNA, Mff siRNA also inhibits fission induced by loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, it delays cytochrome c release from mitochondria and further progression of apoptosis, and it inhibits peroxisomal fission. Mff and Fis1 are both tail anchored in the mitochondrial outer membrane, but other parts of these proteins are very different and they exist in separate 200-kDa complexes, suggesting that they play different roles in the fission process. We conclude that Mff is a novel component of a conserved membrane fission pathway used for constitutive and induced fission of mitochondria and peroxisomes.     

Human MIEF1 recruits Drp1 to mitochondrial outer membranes and promotes mitochondrial fusion rather than fission

Mitochondrial morphology is controlled by two opposing processes: fusion and fission. Drp1 (dynamin-related protein 1) and hFis1 are two key players of mitochondrial fission, but how Drp1 is recruited to mitochondria and how Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission is regulated in mammals is poorly understood. Here, we identify the vertebrate-specific protein MIEF1 (mitochondrial elongation factor 1; independently identified as MiD51), which is anchored to the outer mitochondrial membrane. Elevated MIEF1 levels induce extensive mitochondrial fusion, whereas depletion of MIEF1 causes mitochondrial fragmentation. MIEF1 interacts with and recruits Drp1 to mitochondria in a manner independent of hFis1, Mff (mitochondrial fission factor) and Mfn2 (mitofusin 2), but inhibits Drp1 activity, thus executing a negative effect on mitochondrial fission. MIEF1 also interacts with hFis1 and elevated hFis1 levels partially reverse the MIEF1-induced fusion phenotype. In addition to inhibiting Drp1, MIEF1 also actively promotes fusion, but in a manner distinct from mitofusins. In conclusion, our findings uncover a novel mechanism which controls the mitochondrial fusion-fission machinery in vertebrates. As MIEF1 is vertebrate-specific, these data also reveal important differences between yeast and vertebrates in the regulation of mitochondrial dynamics.     

The mitochondrial fission receptor Mff selectively recruits oligomerized Drp1

Dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) is the GTP-hydrolyzing mechanoenzyme that catalyzes mitochondrial fission in the cell. Residing in the cytosol as dimers and tetramers, Drp1 is recruited by receptors on the mitochondrial outer membrane, where it further assembles into a helical ring that drives division via GTP-dependent constriction. The Drp1 receptor Mff is a major regulator of mitochondrial fission, and its overexpression results in increased fission. In contrast, the alternative Drp1 receptors MiD51 and MiD49 appear to recruit inactive forms of Drp1, because their overexpression inhibits fission. Using genetic and biochemical assays, we studied the interaction of Drp1 with Mff. We show that the insert B region of Drp1 inhibits Mff–Drp1 interactions, such that recombinant Drp1 mutants lacking insert B form a stable complex with Mff. Mff cannot bind to assembly-deficient mutants of Drp1, suggesting that Mff selectively interacts with higher-order complexes of Drp1. In contrast, the alternative Drp1 receptors MiD51 and MiD49 can recruit Drp1 dimers. Therefore Drp1 recruitment by Mff versus MiD51 and MiD49 may result in different outcomes because they recruit different subpopulations of Drp1 from the cytosol.