海洋异养细菌利用溶解有机碳的定量评估

【目的】惰性溶解有机碳(refractory dissolved organic carbon,RDOC)是海洋总有机碳的主体组分,RDOC在深海中可保存数千年,构成了巨大的碳储库,在调节气候变化中有重要作用。但RDOC的定量评估尚未有统一的标准方法。通过测定环境中能被异养细菌利用的溶解有机碳(biodegradable DOC,BDOC)可以反过来评估RDOC的量。本文对BDOC测定中一些关键步骤进行验证,为制定海洋RDOC评估标准奠定基础。【方法】本文评估了3种过滤方式及5种滤膜对DOC测定的影响,并评估了瓶子效应和稀释效应对细菌生长和DOC利用的影响。【结果】研究发现,(1) GF/F滤膜、GF-75滤膜、聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)滤膜(孔径0.2μm)、聚碳酸酯(PC)滤膜(孔径0.2μm)和聚四氟乙烯材质针孔过滤器(HA)(孔径0.2μm) 5种滤膜不会引入DOC污染;抽滤过滤和重力过滤方式过滤效果稳定、无污染,而在线过滤效果不稳定,易污染;(2)不同大小培养体系(30–480 mL;表面积/体积比为:1.64–0.67 cm–1)之间的细菌生长速率和DOC利用量没有显著性差异;(3)培养体系稀释度越高,细菌生长速率越高,对数生长期细菌丰度及DOC利用量越低。【结论】综合考虑,建议BDOC和RDOC测定实验中采用抽滤过滤的方式及不进行稀释的培养体系;常用的滤膜和培养体积对BDOC评估无显著影响。结合研究结果,我们提出了评估海洋RDOC的方法。     

以川陕哲罗鲑为目标物种的水样环境DNA分析流程的优化

水样环境DNA分析包括水样采集、DNA提取和分析等流程,已成为监测濒危水生生物种群分布调查的重要手段.为减少在监测目标物种尤其濒危物种中的不确定性,对水环境DNA分析流程的优化至关重要.本研究以川陕哲罗鲑为目标物种,采用滤膜法采集养殖池中的水样,设计了 250 mL、500 mL、1 L和2 L等4种水样采集量,分别采用 PoweWater DNA Isolation kit和DNeasy Tissue and Blood DNA extraction kit 提取水样环境DNA(eDNA),使用物种mtDNA D_loop区特异性引物进行PCR扩增,通过研究滤膜法、水样采集量和水样DNA提取方法对水样eDNA中目标基因检出率的影响,探索适宜的eDNA分析操作方案.结果表明: 使用DNeasy Tissue and Blood DNA extraction kit提取的水样DNA中目的基因的检出率为100%,效果明显优于PoweWater DNA Isolation kit(目标基因的检出率为0);目标基因扩增条带的亮度随水样采样量的增加而增加,其中2 L水样目标基因的扩增效果较理想;序列比对结果显示,本试验从水样DNA中成功扩增得到了川陕哲罗鲑mtDNA Dloop区部分序列.表明DNA提取方法和水样采集量对目标物种的检出率有显著的影响,滤膜法、2 L水样采集量、DNeasy Tissue and Blood DNA extraction kit更适宜进行水样的DNA分析,mtDNA D-loop区可作为川陕哲罗鲑识别的特异性分子标记.     

基于环境DNA宏条形码的洱海鱼类多样性研究

研究使用环境DNA宏条形码(eDNA metabarcoding)检测洱海鱼类多样性, 探索适用于洱海鱼类多样性监测和保护的新方法。通过水样采集、过滤、eDNA提取、遗传标记扩增、测序与生物信息分析的环境DNA宏条形码标准化分析流程, 从洱海16个采样点中获得可检测的9个采样点数据, 共检测出17种鱼类, 其中土著种5种、外来种12种; 鲫(Carassius auratus)、鳙(Hypophthalmichthys nobilis)、麦穗鱼(Pseudorasbora parva)、泥鳅(Misgurnus anguillicaudatus)和食蚊鱼(Gambusia affinis)为优势种。研究结果表明虽然环境DNA宏条形码无法完全替代传统的鱼类监测方法, 但作为一种新兴的生物多样性监测手段, 其可用于快速检测洱海鱼类多样性及其空间分布。     

流式细胞仪鉴定猕猴桃倍性技术研究

利用流式细胞仪(Flow cytometer,FCM)对不同倍性猕猴桃DNA的相对含量进行测定,建立一套简易、快速的鉴定猕猴桃倍性方法。以二倍体"红阳"猕猴桃为对照,‘81-5'、‘皖翠'猕猴桃为试材,通过筛选最优鉴定叶片部位;改良解离液配方;提高滤膜的目数;过滤次数;增加离心次数等优化鉴定技术。结果表明,露地栽培条件下,茎尖下初展叶是倍性鉴定的最佳部位;两次离心;解离液中2%PVP-30;500目滤膜抽滤两次可以有效解决仪器堵管现象,有效去除杂质峰并获得清晰样品峰。通过优化后的鉴定技术可实现同时测定2个以上倍性的猕猴桃混合样品。     

0#柴油对斑马鱼基因组DNA和环境DNA遗传毒性的RAPD比较

研究利用随机扩增多态性DNA (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA, RAPD)技术, 以斑马鱼基因组DNA和其养殖水体中的环境DNA (environmental DNA, eDNA)为模板, 检测0#柴油可溶性组分对斑马鱼(Danio rerio)遗传毒性的影响。结果显示, 通过基因组DNA和eDNA扩增的RAPD图谱均可检测到0#柴油对斑马鱼的遗传毒性。在未受到柴油暴露时, 斑马鱼基因组DNA和水环境中eDNA在96h内的RAPD图谱均无明显变化; 在不同浓度的柴油暴露下, 随着暴露时间(0、24h、48h、72h、96h)延长, 基因组DNA和eDNA的多态性位点减少, 模板稳定性降低; 随着柴油浓度(15%、50%、100%)的增加, 基因组DNA和eDNA的多态性位点也减少, 模板稳定性降低。这表明0#柴油对斑马鱼基因组DNA和eDNA的遗传毒性均呈现时间-效应和浓度-效应关系, 并且无论以斑马鱼基因组DNA还是eDNA为模板, 柴油暴露组和未进行暴露的对照组的RAPD扩增图谱条带变化趋势一致。研究结果为通过RAPD技术检测柴油对水生生物的遗传毒性提供了新的研究思路和技术手段。     

浮游植物中叶绿素a提取方法的比较与改进

对水质监测中叶绿素a的提取方法进行改进,采用反复冻融-浸提方法提取叶绿素a,即将过滤水样的滤膜于-20℃冰箱内和室温下反复冻融3～5次后,放进90%丙酮溶液中浸提20h。与标准方法中的研磨法对比,该方法具有人为误差小、稳定性好、结果准确及操作简单安全等优点,适合运用于常规的水质监测。采用该方法时过滤水量对湖水水样的测定结果有影响(P<0.01),对于纯微囊藻液影响不明显(P>0.05)。因此,在对不同叶绿素水平或营养水平的水体采样时,应注意水样的水量。通过方差分析表明该方法中采用醋酸纤维滤膜、微孔滤膜和玻璃纤维滤膜对结果没有显著影响,对这3种滤膜可以进行自由选择。     

基于环境DNA宏条形码技术的辽东湾典型围海养殖池塘内水母多样性研究

研究使用环境DNA宏条形码技术(eDNA metabarcoding)检测辽东湾东北部河口区围海养殖池塘水母种类多样性,探索适用于水母种类物种鉴定和监测的新方法。利用环境DNA宏条形码技术,分别基于18S rDNA和COI宏条形码检测了辽东湾东北部河口区围海养殖池塘水母种类多样性,通过水样采集、过滤、eDNA提取、遗传标记扩增、测序与生物信息分析的环境DNA宏条形码标准化分析流程,从围海养殖池塘7个采样点中获得可检测的采样点数据。结果显示,基于18S rDNA宏条形码检测出8种水母种类,其中钵水母纲大型水母2种、水螅水母总纲小型水母6种;基于COI宏条形码技术共检测出19种水母种类,其中钵水母纲大型水母5种、水螅水母总纲小型水母14种;两种DNA条形码标记都显示养殖种类海蜇(Rhopilema esculentum)为优势种。研究结果表明,环境DNA宏条形码技术作为一种新兴的生物多样性监测手段可用于快速检测水母种类多样性,在水母类物种鉴定、监测及早期预警中有较大的应用潜能。     

14型肺炎链球菌荚膜多糖纯化工艺中两种去除蛋白方法的比较

目的苯酚抽提法和脱氧胆酸钠沉淀法去除14型肺炎链球菌荚膜多糖中蛋白质的效果比较。方法将3批次14型肺炎链球菌发酵培养液经超滤、乙醇沉淀等方法初步纯化后,平分成两份,分别采用苯酚抽提法和脱氧胆酸钠沉淀法去除蛋白,通过比较多糖收获量、多糖组分检定结果、多糖分子质量、多糖抗原活性、多糖核磁共振图谱,以此评价这两种蛋白去除方法的效果。结果与苯酚抽提法相比,脱氧胆酸钠沉淀法制备的14型肺炎链球菌纯化荚膜多糖除收获量较高,蛋白和核酸杂质含量较低外,氨基己糖含量、多糖分子质量、抗原活性和多糖核磁共振图谱的检定分析结果无显著性差异(P>0.1)。结论作为14型肺炎链球菌荚膜多糖纯化工艺中的除蛋白方法,脱氧胆酸钠沉淀法优于苯酚抽提法。     

环境DNA技术在宜昌江段四大家鱼自然繁殖中的应用

本研究通过环境DNA(eDNA)技术的样品采集及DNA提取方法,采用微滴式数字PCR(ddPCR)技术检测了长江干流宜昌江段不同水层、不同断面四大家鱼的eDNA浓度,分析了eDNA浓度变化与卵苗密度的关系,探讨了利用eDNA技术监测四大家鱼自然繁殖情况的可行性.结果 表明:与传统调查结果相比,四大家鱼的eDNA浓度与卵...     

模式小鼠总DNA三种提取方法比较

目的：建立简便、快捷、经济的模式小鼠总DNA提取方法,以快速鉴定大批量模式小鼠基因型。方法采用苯酚抽提法、异丙醇沉淀法、鼠耳煮沸法提取同种模式小鼠总DNA,对比DNA纯度、得率、耗费时间,并比较基因型鉴定结果。结果苯酚抽提法得率最高,异丙醇沉淀法最低;而纯度则按照苯酚抽提法、异丙醇沉淀法、鼠耳煮沸法顺序递减;在耗时上鼠耳煮沸法最短。三种方法提取的DNA均可做模版用于基因型鉴定。结论鼠耳煮沸法操作简单、成本最低,快速、基因型鉴定结果可靠,可用于规模化的基因型鉴定实验中。     

Effects of water pH and proteinase K treatment on the yield of environmental DNA from water samples

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has recently been applied to the study of aquatic macroorganisms. In most studies, sample water was filtered and the extracted DNA from the residues on the filter used for the following molecular analysis to detect species of interest. This quick, new biomonitoring method has received broad attention, but some unknowns remain, such as the eDNA yield in relation to water quality. Previous studies suggest that eDNA is composed of various forms, such as the free-floating naked form and in organelles and cells. Therefore, the eDNA yield in the filtration and extraction steps might change depending on the composition of eDNA. Especially the filtration efficiency of free-floating DNA would be affected by the electrical effect of water pH. In this study, not only the free-floating naked DNA, but also all DNA fragments released from the organisms and contained in the water were defined as eDNA, including cells and organelles. We examined (1) the effect of water pH on the eDNA yield at filtration and (2) the effect of proteinase K treatment on the extraction efficiency of DNA from filter samples, with consideration of the variety of the eDNA forms in water. In a laboratory experiment using the purified DNA of common carp (Cyprinus carpio carpio) spiked into ultrapure water, the water pH and DNA yield showed a negative relationship within the pH range of 5–9, that is, the DNA yield was higher in acidic conditions, plausibly because of pH-dependent adsorption onto the glass fiber filter at the filtration step. In case the field water contained eDNA derived from the inhabiting common carp and the purified DNA of ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis) spiked in the sample as an internal standard, adjustment of the pH to 5 prior to filtration did not increase the eDNA yield of common carp, and the spiked ayu DNA was not detected at all. During the DNA extraction step, a standard protocol including proteinase K treatment marked higher DNA yield than that without proteinase K treatment. Overall, the present results indicate successful collection of eDNA using filters without any special attention to the pH of the sample water, and a conventional protocol with proteinase K treatment is appropriate for eDNA recovery.     

Modeling the Sensitivity of Field Surveys for Detection of Environmental DNA (eDNA)

The environmental DNA (eDNA) method is the practice of collecting environmental samples and analyzing them for the presence of a genetic marker specific to a target species. Little is known about the sensitivity of the eDNA method. Sensitivity is the probability that the target marker will be detected if it is present in the water body. Methods and tools are needed to assess the sensitivity of sampling protocols, design eDNA surveys, and interpret survey results. In this study, the sensitivity of the eDNA method is modeled as a function of ambient target marker concentration. The model accounts for five steps of sample collection and analysis, including: 1) collection of a filtered water sample from the source; 2) extraction of DNA from the filter and isolation in a purified elution; 3) removal of aliquots from the elution for use in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay; 4) PCR; and 5) genetic sequencing. The model is applicable to any target species. For demonstration purposes, the model is parameterized for bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) and silver carp (H. molitrix) assuming sampling protocols used in the Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS). Simulation results show that eDNA surveys have a high false negative rate at low concentrations of the genetic marker. This is attributed to processing of water samples and division of the extraction elution in preparation for the PCR assay. Increases in field survey sensitivity can be achieved by increasing sample volume, sample number, and PCR replicates. Increasing sample volume yields the greatest increase in sensitivity. It is recommended that investigators estimate and communicate the sensitivity of eDNA surveys to help facilitate interpretation of eDNA survey results. In the absence of such information, it is difficult to evaluate the results of surveys in which no water samples test positive for the target marker. It is also recommended that invasive species managers articulate concentration-based sensitivity objectives for eDNA surveys. In the absence of such information, it is difficult to design appropriate sampling protocols. The model provides insights into how sampling protocols can be designed or modified to achieve these sensitivity objectives.     

基于微滴式数字PCR方法的鱼类环境DNA样本处理与保存技术优化

以实验室内的鲫(Carassius auratus)为研究对象,利用微滴式数字PCR(Droplet Digital PCR,ddPCR)定量技术,优化了鱼类环境DNA(Environmental DNA,eDNA)样本的捕获、提取和保存方法,并对免DNA提取的PCR直扩技术进行了探索.研究结果如下:(1)在同一孔径、...     

A practical guide to sample preservation and pre‐PCR processing of aquatic environmental DNA

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is rapidly growing in popularity as a tool for community assessments and species detection. While eDNA approaches are now widely applied, there is not yet agreement on best practices for sample collection and processing. Investigators looking to integrate eDNA approaches into their research programme are required to examine a growing collection of disparate studies to make an often uncertain decision about which protocols best fit their needs. To promote the application of eDNA approaches and to encourage the generation of high‐quality data, here we review the most common techniques for the collection, preservation and extraction of metazoan eDNA from water samples. Specifically, we focus on experimental studies that compare various methods and outline the numerous challenges associated with eDNA. While the diverse applications of eDNA do not lend themselves to a one‐size‐fits‐all recommendation, in most cases, capture/concentration of eDNA on cellulose nitrate filters (with pore size determined by water turbidity), followed by storage of filters in Longmire's buffer and extraction with a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (or similar) has been shown to provide sufficient, high‐quality DNA. However, we also emphasize the importance of testing and optimizing protocols for the system of interest.     

Improved environmental DNA sampling scheme for Alabama sturgeon provides new insight into a species once presumed extinct

Detection of rare species can be challenging and time-consuming using conventional methods, but environmental DNA (eDNA) is becoming a commonly used tool for detection in conservation and management of species. This study demonstrates the utility of the precipitation method (precipitated and preserved in 3 M sodium acetate and 95% ethanol) for collection of eDNA to detect the seasonal distribution of the critically endangered Alabama sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus suttkusi). Surface and benthic water samples were collected across a wider geographic area than previously published for Alabama sturgeon eDNA. Surface and benthic samples both yielded detections and resulted in a similar proportion of positive detections to previous work. However, by sampling a greater portion of the distribution of the Alabama sturgeon, further insight was provided on potential sturgeon movement. The results of the precipitation method show that Alabama sturgeon detections increase during spawning months, and that the fish may be overwintering in the Tombigbee River. High detections from winter benthic samples suggest that habitat choice may play a role in detectability and highlight the need to consider natural history when designing environmental DNA studies. When designing environmental DNA collection for rare species, sampling design should factor in species ecology, habitat use, site characteristics, and specific questions driving the research.     

Evaluating the effects of laboratory protocols on eDNA detection probability for an endangered freshwater fish

The effectiveness and accuracy of detection using environmental DNA (eDNA) is dependent on understanding the influence laboratory methods such as DNA extraction and PCR strategies have on detection probability. Ideally choice of sampling and extraction method will maximize eDNA yield and detection probability. Determining the survey effort required to reach a satisfactory detection probability (via increased PCR replicates or more sampling) could compensate for a lower eDNA yield if the sampling and extraction method has other advantages for a study, species or system. I analysed the effect of three different sampling and extraction methods on eDNA yield, detection probability and PCR replication for detecting the endangered freshwater fish Macquaria australasica from water samples. The impact of eDNA concentration, PCR strategy, target amplicon size and two marker regions: 12S (a mitochondrial gene) and 18S (a nuclear gene) was also assessed. The choice of sampling and extraction method and PCR strategy, rather than amplicon size and marker region, had the biggest effect on detection probability and PCR replication. The PCR replication effort required to achieve a detection probability of 0.95, ranged from 2 to 6 PCR replicates depending on the laboratory method used. As all methods yielded eDNA from which M. australasica was detected using the three target amplicons, differences in eDNA yield and detection probability between the three methods could be mitigated by determining the appropriate PCR replication effort. Evaluating the effect sampling and extraction methods will have on the detection probability and determining the laboratory protocols and PCR replication required to maximize detection and minimize false positives and negatives is a useful first step for eDNA occupancy studies.     

Detection of the endangered European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) via water and sediment samples: Testing multiple eDNA workflows

The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is classified as highly endangered in several countries of Central Europe. Populations of M. fossilis are predominantly found in ditches with low water levels and thick sludge layers and are thus hard to detect using conventional fishing methods. Therefore, environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring appears particularly relevant for this species. In previous studies, M. fossilis was surveyed following eDNA water sampling protocols, which were not optimized for this species. Therefore, we created two full factorial study designs to test six different eDNA workflows for sediment samples and twelve different workflows for water samples. We used qPCR to compare the threshold cycle (C_t) values of the different workflows, which indicate the target DNA amount in the sample, and spectrophotometry to quantify and compare the total DNA amount inside the samples. We analyzed 96 water samples and 48 sediment samples from a pond with a known population of M. fossilis. We tested several method combinations for long‐term sample preservation, DNA capture, and DNA extraction. Additionally, we analyzed the DNA yield of samples from a ditch with a natural M. fossilis population monthly over one year to determine the optimal sampling period. Our results showed that the long‐term water preservation method commonly used for eDNA surveys of M. fossilis did not lead to optimal DNA yields, and we present a valid long‐term sample preservation alternative. A cost‐efficient high salt DNA extraction led to the highest target DNA yields and can be used for sediment and water samples. Furthermore, we were able to show that in a natural habitat of M. fossilis, total and target eDNA were higher between June and September, which implies that this period is favorable for eDNA sampling. Our results will help to improve the reliability of future eDNA surveys of M. fossilis.     

A probabilistic model for designing and assessing the performance of eDNA sampling protocols

Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling, the detection of species‐specific genetic material in water samples, is an emerging tool for monitoring aquatic invasive species. Optimizing eDNA sampling protocols can be challenging because there is imperfect understanding of how each step of the protocol influences its sensitivity. This paper develops a probabilistic model that characterizes each step of an eDNA sampling protocol to evaluate the protocol's overall detection sensitivity for one sample. The model is then applied to analyse how changes over time made to the eDNA sampling protocol to detect bighead (BH) and silver carp (SC) eDNA have influenced its sensitivity, and hence interpretation of the results. The model shows that changes to the protocol have caused the sensitivity of the protocol to fluctuate. A more efficient extraction method in 2013, new species‐specific markers with a qPCR assay in 2014, and a more efficient capture method in 2015 have improved the sensitivity, while switching to a larger elution volume in 2013 and a smaller sample volume in 2015 have reduced the sensitivity. Overall, the sensitivity of the current protocol is higher for BH eDNA detection and SC eDNA detection compared to the original protocol used from 2009 to 2012. The paper shows how this model of eDNA sampling can be used to evaluate the effect of proposed changes in an eDNA sampling and analysis protocol on the sensitivity of that protocol to help researchers optimize their design.