Wheat PR‐1 proteins are targeted by necrotrophic pathogen effector proteins

Recent studies have identified that proteinaceous effectors secreted by Parastagonospora nodorum are required to cause disease on wheat. These effectors interact in a gene‐for‐gene manner with host‐dominant susceptibilty loci, resulting in disease. However, whilst the requirement of these effectors for infection is clear, their mechanisms of action remain poorly understood. A yeast‐two‐hybrid library approach was used to search for wheat proteins that interacted with the necrotrophic effector SnTox3. Using this strategy we indentified an interaction between SnTox3 and the wheat pathogenicity‐related protein TaPR‐1‐1, and confirmed it by in‐planta co‐immunprecipitation. PR‐1 proteins represent a large family (23 in wheat) of proteins that are upregulated early in the defence response; however, their function remains ellusive. Interestingly, the P. nodorum effector SnToxA has recently been shown to interact specifically with TaPR‐1‐5. Our analysis of the SnTox3–TaPR‐1 interaction demonstrated that SnTox3 can interact with a broader range of TaPR‐1 proteins. Based on these data we utilised homology modeling to predict, and validate, regions on TaPR‐1 proteins that are likely to be involved in the SnTox3 interaction. Precipitating from this work, we identified that a PR‐1‐derived defence signalling peptide from the C‐terminus of TaPR‐1‐1, known as CAPE1, enhanced the infection of wheat by P. nodorum in an SnTox3‐dependent manner, but played no role in ToxA‐mediated disease. Collectively, our data suggest that P. nodorum has evolved unique effectors that target a common host‐protein involved in host defence, albeit with different mechanisms and potentially outcomes.     

Characteristic expression of wheat PR5 gene in response to infection by the leaf rust pathogen,Puccinia triticina

TaLr35PR5 gene was obtained from the gDNA and cDNA of TcLr35 wheat. It was induced by Puccinia triticina, ABA and SA, but TaLr35PR5 was induced earlier and its expression level was higher in the incompatible interaction than that in the compatible interaction. In addition, the accumulations of TaLr35PR5 increased stably and showed significant peak challenged by P. triticina at different growth and development periods of TcLr35 wheat while it maintained similar level and changed little in mock inoculated. Western blottings were conducted to confirm that TaLr35PR5 be induced by P. triticina infection at the protein expression level. Similar to the expression patterns of TaLr35PR5 at RNA levels, the accumulations of TaLr35PR5 protein were weak in the seedling stage, then increased to the peak and kept constant levels at the mature stage which is consistent with the expression feature of Lr35 gene as an adult plant resistance gene.     

Identification of elicitor‐responsive proteins in rice leaves by a proteomic approach

Experiments were conducted to identify the differentially expressed proteins in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants after treatment with the glycoprotein elicitor CSB I, purified from ZC₁₃, a race of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. The interactions of two near isogenic lines of rice, C101A51 and CO39, with ZC₁₃ resulted in completely incompatible and compatible types, respectively. Proteins were extracted from rice leaves at 12 and 24 h after treatment with CSB I. Temporal changes in total proteins were examined using 2‐DE. Among more than 900 protein spots reproducibly detected on each gel, 11 were up‐regulated, three were down‐regulated and seven were newly induced during, at a minimum, one time point. Twenty‐one differentially expressed proteins were identified by linear ion trap quadrupole (LTQ)‐MS/MS. The identified proteins were classified into six categories based on their putative function reported: (i) defense proteins (PR‐10a, PR‐5 and putative salt‐induced protein), (ii) signal transduction (nucleoside diphosphate kinase and putative profilin), (iii) ROS (Mn‐SOD, Cu/Zn‐SOD, GST and CAT), (iv) programmed cell death (translationally controlled tumor protein), (v) molecule biosynthesis (putative ribosomal protein S5, putative ribosomal protein L12, putative translational elongation factor Tu and putative chaperonin 21 precursor) and (vi) metabolism (putative fructose‐bisphosphate aldolase class‐I, putative malate dehydrogenase, cytoplasmic malate dehydrogenase, putative acid phosphatase, putative transketolase1 and gamma hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase‐like protein). All of these proteins (except Cu/Zn‐SOD, putative acid phosphatase and translationally controlled tumor protein) were induced faster and to a higher degree in C101A51 than in CO39. These data suggest that the incompatible rice line may possess a more sensitive recognition system that can identify and react to specific chemical, biological or physical triggers in a more efficient manner, thus eliciting an early and fast defense response.     

Expression of tomato salicylic acid (SA)‐responsive pathogenesis‐related genes in Mi‐1‐mediated and SA‐induced resistance to root‐knot nematodes

The expression pattern of pathogenesis‐related genes PR‐1, PR‐2 and PR‐5, considered as markers for salicylic acid (SA)‐dependent systemic acquired resistance (SAR), was examined in the roots and shoots of tomato plants pre‐treated with SA and subsequently infected with root‐knot nematodes (RKNs) (Meloidogyne incognita). PR‐1 was up‐regulated in both roots and shoots of SA‐treated plants, whereas the expression of PR‐5 was enhanced only in roots. The over‐expression of PR‐1 in the whole plant occurred as soon as 1 day after SA treatment. Up‐regulation of the PR‐1 gene was considered to be the main marker of SAR elicitation. One day after treatment, plants were inoculated with active juveniles (J2s) of M. incognita. The number of J2s that entered the roots and started to develop was significantly lower in SA‐treated than in untreated plants at 5 and 15 days after inoculation. The expression pattern of PR‐1, PR‐2 and PR‐5 was also examined in the roots and shoots of susceptible and Mi‐1‐carrying resistant tomato plants infected by RKNs. Nematode infection produced a down‐regulation of PR genes in both roots and shoots of SA‐treated and untreated plants, and in roots of Mi‐carrying resistant plants. Moreover, in resistant infected plants, PR gene expression, in particular PR‐1 gene expression, was highly induced in shoots. Thus, nematode infection was demonstrated to elicit SAR in shoots of resistant plants. The data presented in this study show that the repression of host defence SA signalling is associated with the successful development of RKNs, and that SA exogenously added as a soil drench is able to trigger a SAR‐like response to RKNs in tomato.     

Chitinases of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Coffea arabica</Emphasis> genotypes resistant to orange rust <Emphasis Type="Italic">Hemileia vastatrix</Emphasis>

Two Coffea arabica — Hemileia vastatrix incompatible interactions (I₁: coffee cv. Caturra — rust race VI and I₂: coffee cv S4 Agaro — rust race II) and a compatible interaction (coffee cv. Caturra — rust race II) were compared in relation to the infection process and chitinase activity. In the two incompatible interactions the fungus ceased growth in the early infection stages, while in the compatible interaction no fungus growth inhibition was observed. A high constitutive level of chitinase activity was detected in the intercellular fluid of healthy leaves. Upon infection, chitinase isoforms were more abundant in incompatible interactions than in the compatible interaction. Immunodetection showed that class I chitinases are particularly relevant in the incompatible interactions and might participate in the defence response of the coffee plants.