Evolutionary insights into umami,sweet, and bitter taste receptors in amphibians

Umami and sweet sensations provide animals with important dietary information for detecting and consuming nutrients, whereas bitter sensation helps animals avoid potentially toxic or harmful substances. Enormous progress has been made toward animal sweet/umami taste receptor (Tas1r) and bitter taste receptor (Tas2r). However, information about amphibians is mainly scarce. This study attempted to delineate the repertoire of Tas1r/Tas2r genes by searching for currently available genome sequences in 14 amphibian species. This study identified 16 Tas1r1, 9 Tas1r2, and 9 Tas1r3 genes to be intact and another 17 Tas1r genes to be pseudogenes or absent in the 14 amphibians. According to the functional prediction of Tas1r genes, two species have lost sweet sensation and seven species have lost both umami and sweet sensations. Anurans possessed a large number of intact Tas2rs, ranging from 39 to 178. In contrast, caecilians possessed a contractive bitter taste repertoire, ranging from 4 to 19. Phylogenetic and reconciling analysis revealed that the repertoire of amphibian Tas1rs and Tas2rs was shaped by massive gene duplications and losses. No correlation was found between feeding preferences and the evolution of Tas1rs in amphibians. However, the expansion of Tas2rs may help amphibians adapt to both aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Bitter detection may have played an important role in the evolutionary adaptation of vertebrates in the transition from water to land.     

The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste

Sweet and umami (the taste of monosodium glutamate) are the main attractive taste modalities in humans. T1Rs are candidate mammalian taste receptors that combine to assemble two heteromeric G-protein-coupled receptor complexes: T1R1+3, an umami sensor, and T1R2+3, a sweet receptor. We now report the behavioral and physiological characterization of T1R1, T1R2, and T1R3 knockout mice. We demonstrate that sweet and umami taste are strictly dependent on T1R-receptors, and show that selective elimination of T1R-subunits differentially abolishes detection and perception of these two taste modalities. To examine the basis of sweet tastant recognition and coding, we engineered animals expressing either the human T1R2-receptor (hT1R2), or a modified opioid-receptor (RASSL) in sweet cells. Expression of hT1R2 in mice generates animals with humanized sweet taste preferences, while expression of RASSL drives strong attraction to a synthetic opiate, demonstrating that sweet cells trigger dedicated behavioral outputs, but their tastant selectivity is determined by the nature of the receptors.     

Coding of sweet,bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways

Mammals can taste a wide repertoire of chemosensory stimuli. Two unrelated families of receptors (T1Rs and T2Rs) mediate responses to sweet, amino acids, and bitter compounds. Here, we demonstrate that knockouts of TRPM5, a taste TRP ion channel, or PLCbeta2, a phospholipase C selectively expressed in taste tissue, abolish sweet, amino acid, and bitter taste reception, but do not impact sour or salty tastes. Therefore, despite relying on different receptors, sweet, amino acid, and bitter transduction converge on common signaling molecules. Using PLCbeta2 taste-blind animals, we then examined a fundamental question in taste perception: how taste modalities are encoded at the cellular level. Mice engineered to rescue PLCbeta2 function exclusively in bitter-receptor expressing cells respond normally to bitter tastants but do not taste sweet or amino acid stimuli. Thus, bitter is encoded independently of sweet and amino acids, and taste receptor cells are not broadly tuned across these modalities.     

The sweet and the bitter of mammalian taste

The discovery of two families of mammalian taste receptors has provided important insights into taste recognition and taste perception. Recent studies have examined the receptors and signaling pathways that mediate sweet, bitter, and amino acid taste detection in mammals. These studies demonstrate that taste cells are selectively tuned to different taste modalities and clarify the logic of taste coding in the periphery.     

Receptors for bitter and sweet taste

The identification of two families of receptors, T1Rs and T2Rs, for sweet and bitter taste stimuli has opened the door to understanding some of the basic mechanisms underlying taste transduction in mammals. Studies of the functions of these receptors and their patterns of expression provide important information regarding the detection of structurally diverse taste compounds and the manner in which different taste qualities are encoded in the mouth.     

Trpm5 null mice respond to bitter, sweet, and umami compounds

Trpm5 is a calcium-activated cation channel expressed selectively in taste receptor cells. A previous study reported that mice with an internal deletion of Trpm5, lacking exons 15-19 encoding transmembrane segments 1-5, showed no taste-mediated responses to bitter, sweet, and umami compounds. We independently generated knockout mice null for Trpm5 protein expression due to deletion of Trpm5's promoter region and exons 1-4 (including the translation start site). We examined the taste-mediated responses of Trpm5 null mice and wild-type (WT) mice using three procedures: gustatory nerve recording [chorda tympani (CT) and glossopharyngeal (NG) nerves], initial lick responses, and 24-h two-bottle preference tests. With bitter compounds, the Trpm5 null mice showed reduced, but not abolished, avoidance (as indicated by licking responses and preference ratios higher than those of WT), a normal CT response, and a greatly diminished NG response. With sweet compounds, Trpm5 null mice showed no licking response, a diminished preference ratio, and absent or greatly reduced nerve responses. With umami compounds, Trpm5 null mice showed no licking response, a diminished preference ratio, a normal NG response, and a greatly diminished CT response. Our results demonstrate that the consequences of eliminating Trmp5 expression vary depending upon the taste quality and the lingual taste field examined. Thus, while Trpm5 is an important factor in many taste responses, its absence does not eliminate all taste responses. We conclude that Trpm5-dependent and Trpm5-independent pathways underlie bitter, sweet, and umami tastes.     

Measures of taste discriminability for sweet, salty and umami stimuli: Japanese versus Americans

Japanese and American subjects performed triangle tests withvarious concentrations of sucrose. NaCl and MSG. Both sets ofsubjects were tested in their own countries in their own languages.The Japanese discriminated significantly better for sucroseand MSG, while for NaCl there were no significant differencesbetween the groups. To protect against variation in water puritybetween the American and Japanese laboratories. 10 mM NaCl wasused as the solvent, while judges were pre-adapted to the solventto render it tasteless. Changing from purified water to 10 mMNaCl as the solvent, alters the discriminability of the stimuli.     

Capsaicin receptors are colocalized with sweet/bitter receptors in the taste sensing cells of circumvallate papillae

We examined co-localization of vanilloid receptor (VR1) with sweet receptors T1R2, T1R3, or bitter receptor T2R6 in taste receptor cells of rat circumvallate papillae. Tissue sections of rat circumvallate papillae were doubly reacted with anti-VR1 antibodies and anti-T1R2, anti-T1R3 or anti-T2R6 antibodies, using double-immunofluorescence histochemistry technique. Localizations of VR1, T1Rs and T2R6 in the vallate taste cells containing α-gustducin were also examined. VR1 immunoreactivities (-ir) were observed in subsets of taste cells in the circumvallate papillae, and 96–99% of the vallate taste cells exhibiting T1R2-, T1R3- or T2R6-ir co-exhibited VR1-ir. Approximately half of T2R6-ir cells (~49%), and 50–58% of T1Rs-ir cells, co-exhibited α-gustducin-ir in the vallate taste buds. About 58% of VR1-ir cells in the vallate exhibited α-gustducin-ir as well. Results support the idea that capsaicin may interact with the transduction pathways of sweet and bitter taste stimuli, possibly in mediation of its receptor VR1 localized in taste receptor cells. Additionally, the partial co-localization of α-gustducin with VR1 suggests that a tentative modulatory function of capsaicin in sweet and bitter transductions in the rat circumvallate comprises of both α-gustducin-mediated and non-mediated transduction pathways.     

Contrasting modes of evolution between vertebrate sweet/umami receptor genes and bitter receptor genes

Taste reception is fundamental to diet selection in many animals. The genetic basis underlying the evolution and diversity of taste reception, however, is not well understood. Recent discoveries of T1R sweet/umami receptor genes and T2R bitter receptor genes in humans and mice provided an opportunity to address this question. Here, we report the identification of 20 putatively functional T1R genes and 167 T2R genes from the genome sequences of nine vertebrates, including three fishes, one amphibian, one bird, and four mammals. Our comparative genomic analysis shows that orthologous T1R sequences are relatively conserved in evolution and that the T1R gene repertoire remains virtually constant in size across most vertebrates, except for the loss of the T1R2 sweet receptor gene in the sweet-insensitive chicken and the absence of all T1R genes in the tongueless western clawed frog. In contrast, orthologous T2R sequences are more variable, and the T2R repertoire diverges tremendously among species, from only three functional genes in the chicken to 49 in the frog. These evolutionary patterns suggest the relative constancy in the number and type of sweet and umami tastants encountered by various vertebrates or low binding specificities of T1Rs but a large variation in the number and type of bitter compounds detected by different species. Although the rate of gene duplication is much lower in T1Rs than in T2Rs, signals of positive selection are detected during the functional divergences of paralogous T1Rs, as was previously found among paralogous T2Rs. Thus, functional divergence and specialization of taste receptors generally occurred via adaptive evolution.     

Identification of a GABAergic neuroblast lineage modulating sweet and bitter taste sensitivity

1. Download : Download high-res image (120KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

The food of sweet and bitter fancy

The MAP30 ribosomal inactivating protein structure has been determined by NMR spectroscopy. This anti-HIV and anti-cancer protein is an RNA and DNA glycosylase as well as a DNA apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) lyase.     

Effects of linoleic acid on sweet, sour, salty, and bitter taste thresholds and intensity ratings of adults

Evidence supporting a taste component for dietary fat has prompted study of plausible transduction mechanisms. One hypothesizes that long-chain, unsaturated fatty acids block selected delayed-rectifying potassium channels, resulting in a sensitization of taste receptor cells to stimulation by other taste compounds. This was tested in 17 male and 17 female adult (mean +/- SE age = 23.4 +/- 0.7 yr) propylthiouracil tasters with normal resting triglyceride concentrations (87.3 +/- 5.6 mg/day) and body mass index (23.3 +/- 0.4 kg/m(2)). Participants were tested during two approximately 30-min test sessions per week for 8 wk. Eight stimuli were assessed in duplicate via an ascending, three-alternative, forced-choice procedure. Qualities were randomized over weeks. Stimuli were presented as room-temperature, 5-ml portions. They included 1% solutions of linoleic acid with added sodium chloride (salty), sucrose (sweet), citric acid (sour), and caffeine (bitter) as well as solutions of these taste compounds alone. Participants also rated the intensity of the five strongest concentrations using the general labeled magnitude scale. The suprathreshold samples were presented in random order with a rinse between each. Subjects made the ratings self-paced while wearing nose clips. It was hypothesized that taste thresholds would be lower and absolute intensity ratings or slopes of intensity functions would be higher for the stimuli mixed with the linoleic acid. Thresholds were compared by paired t-tests and intensity ratings by repeated measures analysis of variance. Thresholds were significantly higher (i.e., lower sensitivity) for the sodium chloride, citric acid, and caffeine solutions with added fatty acid. Sweet, sour, and salty intensity ratings were lower or unchanged by the addition of a fatty acid. The two highest concentrations of caffeine were rated as weaker in the presence of linoleic acid. These data do not support a mechanism for detecting dietary fats whereby fatty acids sensitize taste receptor cells to stimulation by taste compounds.     

Molecular basis of bitter taste

The sense of taste responds to a large variety of stimuli through specific transduction mechanisms. The molecular events in the perception of bitter taste are believed to start with the binding of specific water-soluble molecules to G-protein-coupled receptors encoded by the type 2 family of taste receptor genes and expressed at the surface of taste receptor cells. Recent advances in the identification and cloning of the complete repertoire of genes of this family in humans and rodents provide an opportunity to address unresolved questions in bitter taste. The functional characterization of some of the receptors that these genes encode suggests that it will be possible to understand more precisely their specific functions.     

Rapid entry of bitter and sweet tastants into liposomes and taste cells: implications for signal transduction

Someamphipathic bitter tastants and non-sugar sweeteners are directactivators of G proteins and stimulate transduction pathways in cellsnot related to taste. We demonstrate that the amphipathic bittertastants quinine and cyclo(Leu-Trp) and the non-sugar sweetener saccharin translocate rapidly through multilamellar liposomes. Furthermore, when rat circumvallate (CV) taste buds were incubated withthe above tastants for 30 s, their intracellular concentrations increased by 3.5- to 7-fold relative to their extracellularconcentrations. The time course of this dramatic accumulation was alsomonitored in situ in rat single CV taste buds under a confocallaser-scanning microscope. Tastants were clearly localized to the tastecell cytosol. It is proposed that, due to their rapid permeation into taste cells, these amphipathic tastants may be available for activation of signal transduction components (e.g., G proteins) directly withinthe time course of taste sensation. Such activation may occur inaddition to the action of these tastants on putative G protein-coupledreceptors. This phenomenon may be related to the slow taste onset andlingering aftertaste typically produced by many bitter tastants andnon-sugar sweeteners.

     

A physico-chemical theory of sweet and bitter taste excitation based on the properties of the plasma membrane

Summary This paper is concerned with physical and chemical changes occurring in the taste buds due to the presence of sapid substances, and not with the nervous mechanism transmitting impulses to the brain. From this standpoint taste phenomena are closely allied with general cell physiology or pharmacology. It has been shown that the great majority of anesthetic or toxic substances have a bitter taste and it is considered that the same structural changes occur in the cell membranes in taste buds as in other cells of the body when such substances are present. From consideration of a large amount of experimental data on the taste of organic compounds it is shown that thesweet and bitter substances are chemically very closely related and there is no line of demarcation between them. In many homologous series there is a continuous (rather than discontinuous) transition from sweet to bitter. Sweet substances having a bitter after-taste are also common.It has been pointed out that it is a general property of anesthetics to be stimulants (i. e. to accelerate cell activities)when in low concentrations. The continuous transition from stimulant to narcotic action is correlated with the sweet-bitter transition. FollowingClowes, Lillie and others the cell membrane is looked upon as a balanced emulsion partly of the water in oil type and partly of the reverse type.The phenomena cited above have been explained in terms of adsorption and surface tension action of substances on this emulsion system and the consequent changes in cell membrane permeability due to changes in the phase ratio of the emulsion types.     

Genetic variation of umami taste genes in Koreans

Umami is a pleasant savoury taste imparted by glutamate, a type of amino acid, and ribonucleotides, including inosinate and guanylate, which occur naturally in many foods including meat, fish, vegetables and dairy products. A heterodimer of TAS1R1 and TAS1R3 is known to function as umami taste receptor in humans. To address the association between genetic polymorphism of TAS1R1 / TAS1R3 genes and individual difference in umami taste sensitivity, we have examined the entire coding region of these genes using PCR-mediated direct sequencing analysis. A total of 11 SNPs were identified from 98 unrelated Korean individuals and were in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium. Four out of 11 SNPs were found in the exons and two of them were nonsynonymous ones. These coding SNPs (cSNPs), p.A372T in TAS1R1 and p.C757R in TAS1R3 genes, were common in Koreans, so these will be useful resource for further studies to find a functional allele for individual variation to umami taste sensitivity in our population.