Inviability of hybrids between D. melanogaster and D. simulans results from the absence of simulans X not the presence of simulans Y chromosome

Interspecific crosses between D. melanogaster and D. simulans or its sibling species result in unisexual inviability of the hybrids. Mostly, crosses of D. melanogaster females X D. simulans males produce hybrid females. On the other hand, only hybrid males are viable in the reciprocal crosses. A classical question is the cause of the unisexual hybrid inviability on the chromosomal level. Is it due to the absence of a D. simulans X chromosome or is it due to the presence of a D. simulans Y chromosome? A lack of adequate chromosomal rearrangements available in D. simulans has made it difficult to answer this question. However, it has been assumed that the lethality results from the absence of the D. simulans X rather than the presence of the D. simulans Y. Recently I synthesized the first D. simulans compound-XY chromosome that consists of almost the entire X and Y chromosomes. Males carrying the compound-XY and no free Y chromosome are fertile. By utilizing the compound-XY chromosome, the viability of hybrids with various constitutions of cytoplasm and sex chromosomes has been examined. The results consistently demonstrate that the absence of a D. simulans X chromosome in hybrid genome, and not the presence of the Y chromosome, is a determinant of the hybrid inviability.     

Genetics of Hybrid Inviability and Sterility in Drosophila: Dissection of Introgression of D. simulans Genes in D. melanogaster Genome

Interspecific crosses between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans usually produce sterile unisexual hybrids. The barrier preventing genetic analysis of hybrid inviability and sterility has been taken away by the discovery of a D. simulans strain which produces fertile female hybrids. D. simulans genes in the cytological locations of 21A1 to 22C1-23B1 and 30F3-31C5 to 36A2-7 have been introgressed into the D. melanogaster genetic background by consecutive backcrosses. Flies heterozygous for the introgression are fertile, while homozygotes are sterile both in females and males. The genes responsible for the sterility have been mapped in the introgression. The male sterility is caused by the synergistic effect of multiple genes, while the female sterility genes have been localized to a 170 kb region (32D2 to 32E4) containing 20 open reading frames. Thus, the female sterility might be attributed to a single gene with a large effect. We have also found that the Lethal hybrid rescue mutation which prevents the inviability of male hybrids from the cross of D. melanogaster females and D. simulans males cannot rescue those carrying the introgression, suggesting that D. simulans genes maybe non-functional in this hybrid genotype. The genes responsible for the inviability have not been separated from the female sterility genes by recombination.     

Clonal analysis in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans

We have analysed the viability of cellular clones induced by mitotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster/D. simulans hybrid females during larval growth. These clones contain a portion of either melanogaster or simulans genomes in homozygosity. Analysis has been carried out for the X and the second chromosomes, as well as for the 3L chromosome arm. Clones were not found in certain structures, and in others they appeared in a very low frequency. Only in abdominal tergites was a significant number of clones observed, although their frequency was lower than in melanogaster abdomens. The bigger the portion of the genome that is homozygous, the less viable is the recombinant melano-gaster/simulans hybrid clone. The few clones that appeared may represent cases in which mitotic recombination took place in distal chromosome intervals, so that the clones contained a small portion of either melanogaster or simulans chromosomes in homozygosity. Moreover, Lhr, a gene of D. simulans that suppresses the lethality of male and female melanogaster/simulans hybrids, does not suppress the lethality of the recombinant melanogaster/simulans clones. Thus, it appears that there is not just a single gene, but at least one per tested chromosome arm (and maybe more) that cause hybrid lethality. Therefore, the two species, D. melanogaster and D. simulans, have diverged to such a degree that the absence of part of the genome of one species cannot be substituted by the corresponding part of the genome of the other, probably due to the formation of co-adapted gene complexes in both species following their divergent evolution after speciation. The disruption of those coadapted gene complexes would cause the lethality of the recombinant hybrid clones.     

Genetic screens for factors involved in the notum bristle loss of interspecific hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans

Interspecific cross is a powerful means to uncover hidden within- and between-species variation in populations. One example is a bristle loss phenotype of hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, although both the pure species have exactly the same pattern of bristle formation on the notum. There exists a large amount of genetic variability in the simulans populations with respect to the number of missing bristles in hybrids, and the variation is largely attributable to simulans X chromosomes. Using nine molecular markers, I screened the simulans X chromosome for genetic factors that were responsible for the differences between a pair of simulans lines with high (H) and low (L) missing bristle numbers. Together with duplication-rescue experiments, a single major quantitative locus was mapped to a 13F-14F region. Importantly, this region accounted for most of the differences between H and L lines in three other independent pairs, suggesting segregation of H and L alleles at the single locus in different populations. Moreover, a deficiency screening uncovered several regions with factors that potentially cause the hybrid bristle loss due to epistatic interactions with the other factors.     

The Y chromosome and sperm length in D. melanogaster

Contrary to earlier reports, the sperm length of D. melanogaster males with two Y chromosomes is the same as in males with one Y chromosome.     

Variable modes of inheritance of morphometrical traits in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

We investigated body-size inheritance in interspecific sterile hybrids by crossing a Drosophila simulans strain with 13 strains of Drosophila melanogaster, which were of various origins and chosen for their broad range of genetic variation. A highly significant parent-offspring correlation was observed, showing that the D. melanogaster genes for size are still expressed in a hybrid background. Superimposed on to this additive inheritance, the size of hybrids was always less than the mid-parent value. This phenomenon, which at first sight might be described as dominance or overdominance, is more precisely interpreted as a consequence of a hybrid breakdown, that is, a dysfunction of the parental genes for size when put to work together. This interpretation is enforced by the fact that phenotypic variability was much more prevalent in hybrids than in parents. We also analysed body pigmentation inheritance in the same crosses and got a very different picture. There was no increase in the phenotypic variance of F(1) hybrids and only a low parent-offspring correlation. Apparent overdominance could be observed but in opposite directions, with no evidence of hybrid breakdown. Our data point to the possibility of analysing a diversity of quantitative traits in interspecific hybrids, and indicate that breakdown might be restricted to some traits only.     

Contribution of the X chromosome to a marked reduction in lifespan in interspecies female hybrids of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana

When two species come into contact and interbreed, the production of unfit hybrids can limit or prevent gene flow between the populations, thus maintaining each species’ separate identity. The genetic basis of this hybrid dysfunction has recently begun to be elucidated, particularly for hybrid sterility and inviability. Although these dysfunctions can certainly act as a barrier to gene flow, other post‐zygotic barriers may also play an important role in isolating species from one another. This study examines the genetic basis of the more subtle mechanism of species isolation via a marked reduction in lifespan of interspecies hybrid offspring. We found that females with homozygous X chromosomes in an otherwise interspecies hybrid background displayed a significant reduction in lifespan; this effect is not due to genetic background and appears to arise from complex genetic interactions. Separately, there is an additional severe reduction in lifespan for attached‐X females when they have mated with males of either parental species, which is partly due to interspecific genetic interactions, but primarily due to a female's increased sensitivity to mating when bearing a Y chromosome or the attached‐X chromosome construct.     

Variable post‐zygotic isolation in Drosophila melanogaster/D. simulans hybrids

The study of hybrid inviability reveals cryptic divergence between the genetic interactions that maintain stable phenotypes in the pure species . We characterized the effects of natural variation on the penetrance of hybrid inviability phenotypes in crosses between Drosophila melanogaster and two species of the D. simulans subcomplex, D. simulans and D. sechellia. Using a panel of wild‐caught lines, we studied the levels of genetic variance present in D. simulans and D. sechellia affecting prezygotic and post‐zygotic isolation in hybridizations with D. melanogaster females. We observed extensive variability in the viability of hybrid individuals, dependent on the genotype of the parents, suggesting that intraspecific natural variation manifests directly in hybrid phenotypes. Furthermore, we found that genetic background significantly affects the penetrance of a well‐studied determinant of hybrid inviability: the interaction between Hmr^mel–Lhr^sim. Our results suggest that hybrid inviability – and reproductive isolation generally – can be modified by polymorphisms at multiple loci segregating within the parental species. Just as the penetrance of most mutant phenotypes can be modified by the genetic background within the pure species, the penetrance of hybrid inviability phenotypes is highly influenced by the parental genotypes.     

Rates of DNA sequence evolution are not sex-biased in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans

To determine whether male- or female-biased mutation rates have affected the molecular evolution of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, we calculated the male-to-female ratio of germline cell divisions ([symbol: see text]) from germline generation data and the male-to-female ratio of mutation rate ([symbol: see text]) by comparing chromosomal levels of nucleotide divergence. We found that the ratio of germline cell divisions changes from indicating a weak female bias to indicating a weak male bias as the age of reproduction increases. The range of [symbol: see text] values that we observed, however, does not lead us to expect much, if any, difference in mutation rate between the sexes. Silent and intron nucleotide divergence were compared between nine loci on the X chromosome and nine loci on the second and third chromosomes. The average levels of nucleotide divergence were not significantly different across the chromosomes, although both silent and intron sites show a trend toward slightly more divergence on the X. These results indicate a lack of sex- or chromosome-biased molecular evolution in D. melanogaster and D. simulans.      

Developmental stability in hybrids between the sibling species pair,Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans

Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species D. simulans were hybridized in the laboratory to test the hypothesis that developmental homeostasis in hybrids between two species having no prior gene flow would be significantly reduced. Developmental stability was assessed by measuring fluctuating asymmetry for three bilateral traits: sternopleural chaetae, wing length, and fronto-orbital plus frontal chaetae. Male F₁ hybrids showed no decrease in developmental stability compared to males of parental species. Female hybrids showed significant fluctuating asymmetry compared to other flies. The results are discussed with respect to ideas about coadaptation and gene flow based upon previous studies of hybrid developmental stability.     

Hidden effects of X chromosome introgressions on spermatogenesis in Drosophila simulans x D. mauritiana hybrids unveiled by interactions among minor genetic factors.

One of the most frequent outcomes of interspecific hybridizations in Drosophila is hybrid male sterility. Genetic dissection of this reproductive barrier has revealed that the number of responsible factors is very high and that these factors are frequently engaged in complex epistatic interactions. Traditionally, research strategies have been based on contrasting introgressions of chromosome segments that produce male sterility with those that allow fertility. Few studies have investigated the phenotypes associated with the boundary between fertility and sterility. In this study, we cointrogressed three different X chromosome segments from Drosophila mauritiana into D. simulans. Hybrid males with these three segments are usually fertile, by conventional fertility assays. However, their spermatogenesis shows a significant slowdown, most manifest at lower temperatures. Each of the three introgressed segments retards the arrival of sperm to the seminal vesicles. Other small disturbances in spermatogenesis are evident, which altogether lead to an overall reduction in the amount of motile sperm in their seminal vesicles. These results suggest that a delay in the timing of spermatogenesis, which might be brought about by the cumulative action of many different factors of minor segment, may be the primary cause of hybrid male sterility.     

Recurrent deletion and gene presence/absence polymorphism: telomere dynamics dominate evolution at the tip of 3L in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans

Although Drosophila melanogaster has been the subject of intensive analysis of polymorphism and divergence, little is known about the distribution of variation at the most distal regions of chromosomes arms. Here we report a survey of genetic variation on the tip of 3L in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Levels of single nucleotide polymorphism in the most distal euchromatic sequence are approximately one order of magnitude less than that typically observed in genomic regions of normal crossing over, consistent with what might be expected under models of linked selection in regions of low crossing over. However, despite this reduced level of nucleotide variation, we found abundant deletion polymorphism. These deletions create at least three gene presence/absence polymorphisms within D. melanogaster: the putative G-protein coupled receptor mthl-8 (which is the most distal known or predicted gene on 3L) and the unannotated mRNAs AY060886 and BT006009. Strikingly, D. simulans is also segregating deletions that cause mthl8 presence/absence polymorphism. Breakpoint sequencing and tests of correlations with segregating SNPs in D. melanogaster suggest that each deletion is unique. Cloned breakpoint sequences revealed the presence of Het-A elements just distal to unique, canonical euchromatic sequences. This pattern suggests a model in which repeated telomeric deficiencies cause deletions of euchromatic sequence followed by subsequent "healing" by retrotranposition of Het-A elements. These data reveal the dominance of telomeric dynamics on the evolution of closely linked sequences in Drosophila.     

hobo transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Genomic patterns of occurrence of the transposable element hobo are polymorphic in the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Most tested strains of both species have apparently complete (3.0 kb) and smaller hobo elements (H lines), but in both species some strains completely lack such canonical hobo elements (E lines). The occurrence of H and E lines in D. simulans as well as in D. melanogaster implies that an hypothesis of recent introduction in the latter species is inadequate to explain the phylogenetic occurrence of hobo. Particular internally deleted elements, the approximately 1.5 kb Th1 and Th2 elements, are abundant in many lines of D. melanogaster, and an analogous 1.1 kb internally deleted element, h del sim, is abundant in most lines of D. simulans. Besides the canonical hobo sequences, both species (and their sibling species D. sechellia and D. mauritiana) have many hobo-hybridizing sequences per genome that do not appear to be closely related to the canonical hobo sequence.     

Incompatibility between X chromosome factor and pericentric heterochromatic region causes lethality in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species

The Dobzhansky-Muller model posits that postzygotic reproductive isolation results from the evolution of incompatible epistatic interactions between species: alleles that function in the genetic background of one species can cause sterility or lethality in the genetic background of another species. Progress in identifying and characterizing factors involved in postzygotic isolation in Drosophila has remained slow, mainly because Drosophila melanogaster, with all of its genetic tools, forms dead or sterile hybrids when crossed to its sister species, D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. mauritiana. To circumvent this problem, we used chromosome deletions and duplications from D. melanogaster to map two hybrid incompatibility loci in F(1) hybrids with its sister species. We mapped a recessive factor to the pericentromeric heterochromatin of the X chromosome in D. simulans and D. mauritiana, which we call heterochromatin hybrid lethal (hhl), which causes lethality in F(1) hybrid females with D. melanogaster. As F(1) hybrid males hemizygous for a D. mauritiana (or D. simulans) X chromosome are viable, the lethality of deficiency hybrid females implies that a dominant incompatible partner locus exists on the D. melanogaster X. Using small segments of the D. melanogaster X chromosome duplicated onto the Y chromosome, we mapped a dominant factor that causes hybrid lethality to a small 24-gene region of the D. melanogaster X. We provide evidence suggesting that it interacts with hhl(mau). The location of hhl is consistent with the emerging theme that hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila involve heterochromatic regions and factors that interact with the heterochromatin.     

Response to selection for increased hybridization between Drosophila melanogaster females and D. simulans males.

Females of Drosophila melanogaster and males of D. simulans hybridizing in a nonchoice condition were artificially selected for 12 generations. The frequency of hybridization increased from 10% to 79%. Response to selection occurred in both species, particularly in D. melanogaster. Female receptivity was the primary sexual trait that accounted for breaking up sexual isolation in these species, but it remained unclear which elements of the D. simulans male courtship were involved.