Protein synthesis and processing in cytoplasmic microdomains beneath postsynaptic sites on CNS neurons

Recent studies have shown that protein synthetic machinery consisting of polyribosomes and associated membranous cisterns is selectively localized beneath synaptic sites on neurons. In the present paper, the role of this machinery in neuronal function will be considered. We will: 1. Summarize the studies that characterize the polyribosomes and define their associations with membranous cisterns. Taken together, these observations suggest the existence of a system for the synthesis and posttranslational processing of proteins at individual synaptic sites; 2. Review the evidence that the protein synthetic machinery is particularly prominent during the initial formation of synaptic contacts (during early development), and during lesion-induced synaptogenesis in mature animals. These observations have led to the hypothesis that the polyribosomes produce proteins that play a role in the formation of the synaptic junction; 3. Review evidence that supports the hypothesis that there is a local synthesis of protein within dendrites, as well as local glycosylation; 4. Describe the evidence suggesting that at least some of the protein constituents of the synaptic junction itself are synthesized locally; and 5. Describe our studies that reveal a mechanism for selective dendritic transport of RNA; this transport mechanism permits the delivery of RNA to postsynaptic sites throughout the dendritic arbor. We will advance the hypothesis that neurons position protein synthetic machinery together with the mRNA's that are appropriate for particular synapses beneath synaptic contact regions. At the synaptic site, this machinery could then direct the synthesis of particular proteins that are critical for synapse formation or maintenance. The positioning of protein synthetic machinery at postsynaptic sites permits a rapid local regulation of the production of key proteins by events at individual synapses.     

Protein processing as a regulatory mechanism in the synthesis of the photosynthetic antenna in Chloroflexus

Chloroflexus aurantiacus can be induced to shift from respiratory to photosynthetic energy production by introducing light and/or lowering the oxygen concentration of a culture. After induction, cells synthesize bacteriochlorophyll and proteins for the formation of a functional photosynthetic apparatus. Bacteriochlorophyll is detectable within 2 h after induction. Chlorosome polypeptides are detected after 8–12 h. Two proteins, M_r 60,000 and M_r 47,000, are present in both induced and noninduced cells and react specifically with antibodies against chlorosome polypeptides. Immunological data suggest that these proteins (M_r 60,000 and 47,000) are polyproteins which are transcribed and translated in the dark. When cells are exposed to light or low oxygen tension these proteins are processed into functional polypeptides required in the assembly of the chlorosome. The reaction center polypeptide (M_r 26,000) appears to be part of a separate genetic control system.Dedicated to Prof. G. Drews on occasion of his 60th birthday     

Protein synthesis in the dendrite

In neurons, many proteins that are involved in the transduction of synaptic activity and the expression of neural plasticity are specifically localized at synapses. How these proteins are targeted is not clearly understood. One mechanism is synaptic protein synthesis. According to this idea, messenger RNA (mRNA) translation from the polyribosomes that are observed at the synaptic regions provides a local source of synaptic proteins. Although an increasing number of mRNA species has been detected in the dendrite, information about the synaptic synthesis of specific proteins in a physiological context is still limited. The physiological function of synaptic synthesis of specific proteins in synaptogenesis and neural plasticity expression remains to be shown. Experiments aimed at understanding the mechanisms and functions f synaptic protein synthesis might provide important information about the molecular nature of neural plasticity.     

Protein synthesis in Artemia salina

It is thought that eucaryotic elongation factor eEF-Ts catalyzes the replacement of GDP for GTP on eucaryotic elongation factor eEF-Tu. We have found that eEF-Ts displays a strong nucleoside diphosphate phosphotransferase activity. This transferase activity resides in a dimer molecule of a subunit molecular weight close to 30,000. The transfosforylating activity of eEF-Ts results in a stimulatory effect of ATP, GTP, UTP and CTP on protein synthesis provided that GDP is present. The specificity for guanine nucleotides in protein synthesis resides only in eEF-Tu.     

Heterogeneity in antigen processing by different types of antigen-presenting cells. Effect of cell culture on antigen processing ability.

The ability of normal B cells, peritoneal macrophages, and splenic APC to process and present OVA to a panel of T-T hybridomas with different specificities was investigated. In all cases, B cells were less efficient than unfractionated splenocytes in presenting OVA or its peptides. However, when the presentation of native Ag was compared to the presentation of peptides, it was obvious that there were marked differences in the ability of these two APC populations to generate different epitopes from OVA. Leupeptin inhibits the processing of selected epitopes from native OVA differently when it was presented by spleen cells or B cells, suggesting that these two APC populations differ in their protease content. The effect of in vitro culture on the ability of splenic and peritoneal APC to process OVA was also investigated. Native OVA presentation by macrophages and spleen cells was affected by in vitro culture, more for some epitopes than for other epitopes. In contrast, presentation of exogenous peptides by paraformaldehyde-fixed APC was either not affected by previous culturing for 3 days, or very much improved. Altogether, these data demonstrate that different epitopes on the same protein may be independently and differentially processed by B cells and spleen cells. Furthermore, the precise peptides that are produced may vary with the physiologic state of the APC.     

Protein synthesis rhythm.

The three-dimensional structure of a protein molecule appears to depend on the amino acid sequence of the protein in an as yet incompletely described manner. If the amino acid sequence is replaced by a numerical sequence of values representing a physical or chemical property of amino acids, the resulting numerical sequence is amenable to autocorrelation analysis. Further, if certain geometrical parameters are calculated from the three-dimensional structure of a protein to form a configurational series, pairs of property series and configurational series can be analyzed by cross-correlation techniques. The data base for the analysis was the three-dimensional structures of ten proteins as determined by X-ray crystallography. Such analysis yields the result that the hydrophobicity of an amino acid residue in a protein influences the orientation angle of the amino acid side chain. This result is consistent with the widely current “oil-drop” model of protein structure. Hydrophobicity also appears to influence the backbone dihedral angle φ, but not ψ Such a directional effect cannot be explained by a current model of information transfer in protein helices. The magnitude of the cross correlations does not appear to be satisfactory for construction of a transfer function model for the prediction of general features of protein structure from amino acid sequences.     

Protein synthesis in isolated cell nuclei

1. Nuclei prepared from calf thymus tissue in a sucrose medium actively incorporate labelled amino acids into their proteins. This is an aerobic process which is dependent on nuclear oxidative phosphorylation. 2. Evidence is presented to show that the uptake of amino acids represents nuclear protein synthesis. 3. The deoxyribonucleic acid of the nucleus plays a role in amino acid incorporation. Protein synthesis virtually ceases when the DNA is removed from the nucleus, and uptake resumes when the DNA is restored. 4. In the essential mechanism of amino acid incorporation, the role of the DNA can be filled by denatured or partially degraded DNA, by DNAs from other tissues, and even by RNA. Purine and pyrimidine bases, monoribonucleotides, and certain dinucleotides are unable to substitute for DNA in this system. 5. When the proteins of the nucleus are fractionated and classified according to their specific activities, one finds the histones to be relatively inert. The protein fraction most closely associated with the DNA has a very high activity. A readily extractable ribonucleoprotein complex is also extremely active, and it is tempting to speculate that this may be an intermediary in nucleocytoplasmic interaction. 6. The isolated nucleus can incorporate glycine into nucleic acid purines, and orotic acid into the pyrimidines of its RNA. Orotic acid uptake into nuclear RNA requires the presence of the DNA. 7. The synthesis of ribonucleic acid can be inhibited at any time by a benzimidazole riboside (DRB) (which also retards influenza virus multiplication (11)). 8. The incorporation of amino acids into nuclear proteins seems to require a preliminary activation of the nucleus. This can be inhibited by the same benzimidazole derivative (DRB) which interferes with RNA synthesis, provided that the inhibitor is present at the outset of the incubation. DRB added 30 minutes later has no effect on nuclear protein synthesis. These results suggest that the activation of the nucleus so that it actively incorporates amino acids into its proteins requires a preliminary synthesis of ribonucleic acid. 9. Together with earlier observations (27, 28) on the incorporation of amino acids by cytoplasmic particulates, these results show that protein synthesis can occur in both nucleus and cytoplasm.