RNA的生物合成与加工(一)

所有细胞的RNA都是按照DNA模板的指令,由RNA聚合酶催化合成的。RNA的生物合成(转录)过程的有些地方与DNA复制相似,如底物是核苷三磷酸,合成方向是5′→3′。但,RNA聚合酶不需要引物,也不具备有校正作用的核酸外切酶活力。DNA模板在RNA合成中是全保留的,而在DNA复制中则是半保留的。原核生物的转录原核生物转录的源料主要是从大肠杆菌取得的。大肠杆菌的所有RNA都是由同一种RNA聚合酶催化合成的。这种酶的分子量为460KDa,全酶的亚基组成为α_2ββ′σ,核心酶为α_2ββ′。σ亚基只在转录的启动中起作用,     

荧光偏振技术研究Bloom解旋酶催化核心与双链DNA的相互作用

Bloom 综合症(BLM)解旋酶是RecQ家族DNA解旋酶中的一个重要成员,参与了DNA复制、修复、转录、重组以及端粒的维持等细胞代谢过程,在维持染色体的稳定性中具有重要的作用．BLM解旋酶的突变可导致Bloom综合症,患者遗传不稳定易患多种类型癌症．本研究运用荧光偏振技术研究BLM解旋酶催化核心(BLM^642～1290)与双链DNA(dsDNA)的相互作用,分析其相关特征参数,了解BLM^642～1290解旋酶与dsDNA的结合和解链特性．结果表明：BLM^642～1290解旋酶与dsDNA的结合和解链与dsDNA 3′端的单链DNA(ssDNA)长度有关;解旋酶优先结合于dsDNA底物的ssDNA末端,且每分子解旋酶可结合9.6 nt的ssDNA;dsDNA 3′端ssDNA的长度为9.6 nt时,解旋酶的解链效率达到最大且不再随其长度而变化．另外,BLM^642～1290解旋酶也能够结合和解链钝末端dsDNA,但其结合亲和力和解链效率低于有3′端ssDNA的dsDNA．推测BLM^642～1290解旋酶在与dsDNA底物结合和解链时是单体形式,可能以尺蠖的形式解开dsDNA．这些结果可为进一步研究BLM解旋酶的功能特征提供理论基础．     

真核生物核酸外切体(exosome)的研究进展

RNA的加工和降解是调控基因时空表达的重要步骤,在调节生物体的生长和发育过程中起着至关重要的作用.几乎所有的RNA都是从一条长的前体加工处理而来,形成成熟的RNA发挥功能,之后进行降解.RNA的降解需要5′-3′核酸外切酶、3′-5′核酸外切酶及核酸内切酶的参与.在真核细胞中,部分3′-5′核酸外切酶所进行的RNA降解依赖于一种称为核酸外切体(exosome)的复合物.该复合物由9个核心蛋白亚基组成,已有的证据表明,其广泛参与了动物、酵母及植物体中多种RNA的加工和降解过程.本文综述了真核生物中核酸外切体的研究进展,讨论了该复合体在RNA加工降解过程中的作用机制.     

电子束辐射对大麦种胚核酸合成活性的损伤效应

电子束辐射损伤大麦种胚核酸合成能力的效应主要表现在使DNA复制合成启动推迟 ,使DNA复制、RNA合成活性下降。吸涨过程中大麦种胚的DNA复制合成有一明显的启动过程 ,RNA合成则无明显的启动过程。 2 0 0与 40 0Gy电子束辐射分别使DNA复制合成启动推迟约 2与 4h ;电子束辐射对DNA复制合成活性的抑制作用强于对RNA合成活性的抑制。在 5 0～ 5 0 0Gy范围内 ,大麦种胚DNA复制、RNA合成活性均随辐射剂量呈指数下降 ,其半对数斜率分别为- 0 .0 0 39与 - 0 .0 0 14。根据实验计算 ,电子束辐射对DNA复制合成的LD50 、D37分别为 178与 2 5 6Gy     

RNA病毒基因组和转录复制多样性的分子基础

自然界中RNA病毒的种类和数量比DNA病毒多得多,根据基因组类型,RNA病毒可分为多种类型,许多研究者认为,存在于古细菌Myxobacteria中,仅仅有一个逆转录酶基因的反转子（Retron)可能是所有病毒的祖先,进化的模式如下,反转子→反座子→反转录转座子→反转录病毒→副反转录病毒→DNA病毒,RNA病毒转录。／复制在很多特征上与DNA病毒迥然不同,依赖于RNA的RNA聚合酶是RNA病转录／复制的主要催化剂,RNA病毒基因组转录和复制都从3'端poly(A)或类tRNA结构或其他结构起始,内部终止是转录,通读到5'末端终止是复制,RNA病毒的模板有正链病毒（RNA模板,负链病毒RNA模板和全长正负链反基因组RNA模板,RNA模板的选择调控机制非常复杂,目前知之甚少,选择模板,RNA聚合酶与转录因子结合形成复制体是两种主要的调控方法,另外,5'UTR和3'UTR也可以调控RNA病毒的转录。     

R环的形成及对基因组稳定性的影响

R-环是由一个RNA:DNA杂交体和一条单链状态的DNA分子共同组成的三链核酸结构。其中, RNA:DNA杂交体的形成起因于基因转录所合成的RNA分子不能与模板分开, 或RNA分子重新与一段双链DNA分子中的一条链杂交。在基因转录过程中, 当转录泡遇到富含G碱基的非模板链区或位于某些与人类疾病有关的三核苷酸卫星DNA时, 转录泡后方累积的负超螺旋可促进R环形成。同时, 新生RNA分子未被及时加工、成熟或未被快速转运到细胞质等因素也会催生R环。研究表明, 细胞拥有多种管理R环的方法, 可以有效地管理R环的形成和处理已经形成的R环, 以尽量避免R环对DNA复制、基因突变和同源重组产生不利影响。文章重点分析了R-环的形成机制及R环对DNA复制、基因突变和同源重组的影响, 并针对R-环诱导的DNA复制在某些三核苷酸重复扩增有关的神经肌肉退行性疾病发生过程中的作用进行了分析和讨论。     

R环形成的调控机制及其生物学意义

R环(R-loop)是由一条DNA:RNA杂交链和一条被置换出的单链DNA组成的三链核酸结构,通常在转录过程中形成。R环在基因调控、端粒稳定、DNA复制以及组蛋白修饰等方面都发挥着重要作用。越来越多的研究表明,它们还是复制压力的重要来源,过多的R环累积会造成DNA损伤以及基因组不稳定。此外,R环与许多人类疾病包括神经紊乱、癌症和自身免疫疾病等有关。鉴于R环的重要生理功能及其与疾病的潜在关系,该文重点总结了R环的形成机制、生理功能及R环在基因转录调控和基因组不稳定性中的作用,并讨论了R环调控异常与疾病之间的关系。     

丙型肝炎病毒依赖于RNA的RNA聚合酶(RdRp)研究进展

由于缺乏合适的HCV感染细胞模型,严重制约了HCV复制,特别是HCV复制的关键因子依赖于RNA的RNA聚合酶(RdRp)的研究.对HCV序列比较分析并通过异源表达证明NS5B是HCV复制的RdRp.NS5B C端疏水性氨基酸区域以及NS5B与细胞膜形成复合体等影响NS5B溶解性.在合适的反应条件下NS5B可以多种RNA分子为模板催化RNA复制,特别是能有效复制HCV全长(+)RNA.高浓度GTP激活HCV RdRp活性.NS5B N/C端缺失突变和保守性A、B、C区中的点突变影响RdRp活性,但D区345位精氨酸突变为赖氨酸时RdRp活性明显升高.HCV RdRp的发现及其功能研究为HCV药物研究提供了新型靶标.     

病毒研究的崭新技术--RNA干扰

RNA分子可参与生物体细胞许多基本的生理活动,继发现核酶、肽核酸和反义RNA等之后,近未有关小干扰RNA及其所致的RNA干扰现象又成为研究热点。小干扰RNA是dsRNA被DICER降解后产生的长19～23核苷酸的小RNA片段,具有5′—磷酸、3′——羟基和2个核苷酸(dTdT或UU)的3′端;而RNA干扰则是由小干扰RNA引起的生物细胞内同源基因的特异性沉默现象,其本质是小干扰RNA与对应的mRNA特异结合,形成降解,从而阻止mRNA的翻译。RNA干扰是生物进化的结果,是生物体对病毒基因等外源核酸侵入的一种保护性反应。当病毒在宿主细胞内进行复制时,病毒RNA可被降解成小干扰RNA,从而在细胞内产生的RNA干扰,通过RNA干扰的作用抑制病毒的增殖。     

3′-poly(A)~-病毒RNA的大分子cDNA的合成和克隆

为了合成3′端无poly(A)的病毒RNA(登革热病毒Ⅱ)的3′区的长的cDNA,我们用RNA连接酶,把3′端被pCp封闭了的poly(A)<50bp连在病毒RNA的3′端,构成一个病毒RNA-poly(A)-pCp型模板,可用oligo(dT_(10-12))作引物,再用Watson和Jackson(1985)的RNase H代替硷降解法来合成cDNA。结果获得了≥5kb的cDNA。重组克隆的鉴定证明这个大分子cDNA确是病毒RNA 3′区的拷贝。这将有利于对这类RNA病毒基因组的结构-功能分析和对病毒cDNA拷贝的感染性的研究。     

Interaction with Single-stranded DNA-binding Protein Stimulates Escherichia coli Ribonuclease HI Enzymatic Activity

Single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) bind and protect ssDNA intermediates formed during replication, recombination, and repair reactions. SSBs also directly interact with many different genome maintenance proteins to stimulate their enzymatic activities and/or mediate their proper cellular localization. We have identified an interaction formed between Escherichia coli SSB and ribonuclease HI (RNase HI), an enzyme that hydrolyzes RNA in RNA/DNA hybrids. The RNase HI·SSB complex forms by RNase HI binding the intrinsically disordered C terminus of SSB (SSB-Ct), a mode of interaction that is shared among all SSB interaction partners examined to date. Residues that comprise the SSB-Ct binding site are conserved among bacterial RNase HI enzymes, suggesting that RNase HI·SSB complexes are present in many bacterial species and that retaining the interaction is important for its cellular function. A steady-state kinetic analysis shows that interaction with SSB stimulates RNase HI activity by lowering the reaction K_m. SSB or RNase HI protein variants that disrupt complex formation nullify this effect. Collectively our findings identify a direct RNase HI/SSB interaction that could play a role in targeting RNase HI activity to RNA/DNA hybrid substrates within the genome.     

RNase H is an exo- and endoribonuclease with asymmetric directionality,depending on the binding mode to the structural variants of RNA:DNA hybrids

RNase H is involved in fundamental cellular processes and is responsible for removing the short stretch of RNA from Okazaki fragments and the long stretch of RNA from R-loops. Defects in RNase H lead to embryo lethality in mice and Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome in humans, suggesting the importance of RNase H. To date, RNase H is known to be a non-sequence-specific endonuclease, but it is not known whether it performs other functions on the structural variants of RNA:DNA hybrids. Here, we used Escherichia coli RNase H as a model, and examined its catalytic mechanism and its substrate recognition modes, using single-molecule FRET. We discovered that RNase H acts as a processive exoribonuclease on the 3′ DNA overhang side but as a distributive non-sequence-specific endonuclease on the 5′ DNA overhang side of RNA:DNA hybrids or on blunt-ended hybrids. The high affinity of previously unidentified double-stranded (ds) and single-stranded (ss) DNA junctions flanking RNA:DNA hybrids may help RNase H find the hybrid substrates in long genomic DNA. Our study provides new insights into the multifunctionality of RNase H, elucidating unprecedented roles of junctions and ssDNA overhang on RNA:DNA hybrids.     

RnhP is a plasmid‐borne RNase HI that contributes to genome maintenance in the ancestral strain Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610

RNA‐DNA hybrids form throughout the chromosome during normal growth and under stress conditions. When left unresolved, RNA‐DNA hybrids can slow replication fork progression, cause DNA breaks, and increase mutagenesis. To remove hybrids, all organisms use ribonuclease H (RNase H) to specifically degrade the RNA portion. Here we show that, in addition to chromosomally encoded RNase HII and RNase HIII, Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610 encodes a previously uncharacterized RNase HI protein, RnhP, on the endogenous plasmid pBS32. Like other RNase HI enzymes, RnhP incises Okazaki fragments, ribopatches, and a complementary RNA‐DNA hybrid. We show that while chromosomally encoded RNase HIII is required for pBS32 hyper‐replication, RnhP compensates for the loss of RNase HIII activity on the chromosome. Consequently, loss of RnhP and RNase HIII impairs bacterial growth. We show that the decreased growth rate can be explained by laggard replication fork progression near the terminus region of the right replichore, resulting in SOS induction and inhibition of cell division. We conclude that all three functional RNase H enzymes are present in B. subtilis NCIB 3610 and that the plasmid‐encoded RNase HI contributes to chromosome stability, while the chromosomally encoded RNase HIII is important for chromosome stability and plasmid hyper‐replication.     

The structural and biochemical characterization of human RNase H2 complex reveals the molecular basis for substrate recognition and Aicardi-Goutières syndrome defects

RNase H2 cleaves RNA sequences that are part of RNA/DNA hybrids or that are incorporated into DNA, thus, preventing genomic instability and the accumulation of aberrant nucleic acid, which in humans induces Aicardi-Goutières syndrome, a severe autoimmune disorder. The 3.1 Å crystal structure of human RNase H2 presented here allowed us to map the positions of all 29 mutations found in Aicardi-Goutières syndrome patients, several of which were not visible in the previously reported mouse RNase H2. We propose the possible effects of these mutations on the protein stability and function. Bacterial and eukaryotic RNases H2 differ in composition and substrate specificity. Bacterial RNases H2 are monomeric proteins and homologs of the eukaryotic RNases H2 catalytic subunit, which in addition possesses two accessory proteins. The eukaryotic RNase H2 heterotrimeric complex recognizes RNA/DNA hybrids and (5′)RNA-DNA(3′)/DNA junction hybrids as substrates with similar efficiency, whereas bacterial RNases H2 are highly specialized in the recognition of the (5′)RNA-DNA(3′) junction and very poorly cleave RNA/DNA hybrids in the presence of Mg²⁺ ions. Using the crystal structure of the Thermotoga maritima RNase H2-substrate complex, we modeled the human RNase H2-substrate complex and verified the model by mutational analysis. Our model indicates that the difference in substrate preference stems from the different position of the crucial tyrosine residue involved in substrate binding and recognition.     

Substrate recognition and catalysis by the exoribonuclease RNase R

RNase R is a processive, 3' to 5' hydrolytic exoribonuclease that together with polynucleotide phosphorylase plays an important role in the degradation of structured RNAs. However, RNase R differs from other exoribonucleases in that it can by itself degrade RNAs with extensive secondary structure provided that a single-stranded 3' overhang is present. Using a variety of specifically designed substrates, we show here that a 3' overhang of at least 7 nucleotides is required for tight binding and activity, whereas optimum binding and activity are achieved when the overhang is 10 or more nucleotides in length. In contrast, duplex RNAs with no overhang or with a 4-nucleotide overhang bind extremely poorly to RNase R and are inactive as substrates. A duplex RNA with a 10-nucleotide 5' overhang also is not a substrate. Interestingly, this molecule is bound only weakly, indicating that RNase R does not simply recognize single-stranded RNA, but the RNA must thread into the enzyme with 3' to 5' polarity. We also show that ribose moieties are required for recognition of the substrate as a whole since RNase R is unable to bind or degrade single-stranded DNA. However, RNA molecules with deoxyribose or dideoxyribose residues at their 3' termini can be bound and degraded. Based on these data and a homology model of RNase R, derived from the structure of the closely related enzyme, RNase II, we present a model for how RNase R interacts with its substrates and degrades RNA.     

TERRA mimicking ssRNAs prevail over the DNA substrate for telomerase in vitro due to interactions with the alternative binding site

Telomerase is a key component of the telomere length maintenance system in the majority of eukaryotes. Telomerase displays maximal activity in stem and cancer cells with high proliferative potential. In humans, telomerase activity is regulated by various mechanisms, including the interaction with telomere ssDNA overhangs that contain a repetitive G‐rich sequence, and with noncoding RNA, Telomeric repeat‐containing RNA (TERRA), that contains the same sequence. So these nucleic acids can compete for telomerase RNA templates in the cell. In this study, we have investigated the ability of different model substrates mimicking telomere DNA overhangs and TERRA RNA to compete for telomerase in vitro through a previously developed telomerase inhibitor assay. We have shown in this study that RNA oligonucleotides are better competitors for telomerase that DNA ones as RNA also use an alternative binding site on telomerase, and the presence of 2′‐OH groups is significant in these interactions. In contrast to DNA, the possibility of forming intramolecular G‐quadruplex structures has a minor effect for RNA binding to telomerase. Taking together our data, we propose that TERRA RNA binds better to telomerase compared with its native substrate – the 3′‐end of telomere DNA overhang. As a result, some specific factor may exist that participates in switching telomerase from TERRA to the 3′‐end of DNA for telomere elongation at the distinct period of a cell cycle in vivo. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.