Close encounters of the RNF8th kind: when chromatin meets DNA repair

Cells counteract the adverse effects of chromosome breakage by activating the DNA damage response (DDR), which entails a coordinated series of events that regulate cell cycle progression and repair of DNA lesions. The packaging of genomic DNA into condensed, often inaccessible chromatin severely complicates efficient DNA damage repair in living cells. Recent studies implicate a large number of chromatin-modifying enzymes in the DDR, suggesting a stepwise model in which chromatin is continually reconfigured to accommodate the association and action of repair factors during the different stages of the DDR. Emerging evidence suggests that the histone ubiquitin ligases RNF8/RNF168 act in concert with ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling enzymes to orchestrate the signalling and repair of DNA lesions in specific chromatin topologies.     

Nonuniform distribution of DNA repair in chromatin after treatment with methyl methanesulfonate.

The distribution of methyl methanesulfonate induced DNA repair was measured in mouse mammary cell chromatin by digestion of "repair labeled" nuclei with micrococcal nuclease. The results indicate that there is a nonuniform distribution of DNA repair in chromatin. The chromatin fraction digested during the first 5 minutes of incubation with micrococcal nuclease appears to be a primary site of DNA repair after methyl methanesulfoante treatment. The observed nonuniform distribution of DNA repair in chromatin may be due to 1)a nonrandom alkylation of DNA in chromatin by methyl methanesulfonate or 2)areas in chromatin of increased accessibility for the repair enzymes to the DNA lesions.     

The chromatin remodeler p400 ATPase facilitates Rad51-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks

DNA damage signaling and repair take place in a chromatin context. Consequently, chromatin-modifying enzymes, including adenosine triphosphate–dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes, play an important role in the management of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we show that the p400 ATPase is required for DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR). Indeed, although p400 is not required for DNA damage signaling, DNA DSB repair is defective in the absence of p400. We demonstrate that p400 is important for HR-dependent processes, such as recruitment of Rad51 to DSB (a key component of HR), homology-directed repair, and survival after DNA damage. Strikingly, p400 and Rad51 are present in the same complex and both favor chromatin remodeling around DSBs. Altogether, our data provide a direct molecular link between Rad51 and a chromatin remodeling enzyme involved in chromatin decompaction around DNA DSBs.     

Five repair pathways in one context: chromatin modification during DNA repair.

The eukaryotic cell is faced with more than 10 000 various kinds of DNA lesions per day. Failure to repair such lesions can lead to mutations, genomic instability, or cell death. Therefore, cells have developed 5 major repair pathways in which different kinds of DNA damage can be detected and repaired: homologous recombination, nonhomologous end joining, nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, and mismatch repair. However, the efficient repair of DNA damage is complicated by the fact that the genomic DNA is packaged through histone and nonhistone proteins into chromatin, a highly condensed structure that hinders DNA accessibility and its subsequent repair. Therefore, the cellular repair machinery has to circumvent this natural barrier to gain access to the damaged site in a timely manner. Repair of DNA lesions in the context of chromatin occurs with the assistance of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes and histone-modifying enzymes, which allow access of the necessary repair factors to the lesion. Here we review recent studies that elucidate the interplay between chromatin modifiers / remodelers and the major DNA repair pathways.     

Repair of depurinated DNA with enzymes from rat liver chromatin.

DNA from T7 phage containing AP (apurinic/apyrimidinic) sites was repaired by the successive actions of three chromatin enzymes [AP endodeoxyribonuclease, DNAase IV (5'----3'-exodeoxyribonuclease) and DNA polymerase-beta] prepared from rat liver and T4-phage DNA ligase. Since DNA ligase is also found in rat liver chromatin, all the activities used for the successful repair in vitro are thus present in the chromatin of a eukaryotic cell. Our results show, in particular, that the chromatin DNAase IV is capable of excising the AP site from the DNA strand nicked by the chromatin AP endodeoxyribonuclease. We did not try to combine all the enzymes, since competition between some of them might have prevented the repair; we have, for instance, shown that DNA ligase can seal the incision 5' to the AP site made by the AP endodeoxyribonuclease. Changes in chromatin structure during repair might perhaps prevent this competition when nuclear DNA is repaired in the living cell.     

Chromatin rearrangements during nucleotide excision repair

The removal of DNA damage from the eukaryotic genome requires DNA repair enzymes to operate within the complex environment of chromatin. We review the evidence for chromatin rearrangements during nucleotide excision repair and discuss the extent and possible molecular mechanisms of these rearrangements, focusing on events at the nucleosome level of chromatin structure.     

Organization of DNA damage,excision repair,and mutagenesis in chromatin: A genomic perspective

Genomic DNA is constantly assaulted by both endogenous and exogenous damaging agents. The resulting DNA damage, if left unrepaired, can interfere with DNA replication and be converted into mutations. Genomic DNA is packaged into a highly compact yet dynamic chromatin structure, in order to fit into the limited space available in the nucleus of eukaryotic cells. This hierarchical chromatin organization serves as both the target of DNA damaging agents and the context for DNA repair enzymes. Biochemical studies have suggested that both the formation and repair of DNA damage are significantly modulated by chromatin. Our understanding of the impact of chromatin on damage and repair has been significantly enhanced by recent studies. We focus on the nucleosome, the primary building block of chromatin, and discuss how the intrinsic structural properties of nucleosomes, and their associated epigenetic modifications, affect damage formation and DNA repair, as well as subsequent mutagenesis in cancer.     

Accessing DNA damage in chromatin: Preparing the chromatin landscape for base excision repair

DNA damage in chromatin comes in many forms, including single base lesions that induce base excision repair (BER). We and others have shown that the structural location of DNA lesions within nucleosomes greatly influences their accessibility to repair enzymes. Indeed, a difference in the location of uracil as small as one-half turn of the DNA backbone on the histone surface can result in a 10-fold difference in the time course of its removal in vitro. In addition, the cell has evolved several interdependent processes capable of enhancing the accessibility of excision repair enzymes to DNA lesions in nucleosomes, including post-translational modification of histones, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling and interchange of histone variants in nucleosomes. In this review, we focus on different factors that affect accessibility of BER enzymes to nucleosomal DNA.     

RSC facilitates Rad59-dependent homologous recombination between sister chromatids by promoting cohesin loading at DNA double-strand breaks

Homologous recombination repairs DNA double-strand breaks by searching for, invading, and copying information from a homologous template, typically the homologous chromosome or sister chromatid. Tight wrapping of DNA around histone octamers, however, impedes access of repair proteins to DNA damage. To facilitate DNA repair, modifications of histones and energy-dependent remodeling of chromatin are required, but the precise mechanisms by which chromatin modification and remodeling enzymes contribute to homologous DNA repair are unknown. Here we have systematically assessed the role of budding yeast RSC (remodel structure of chromatin), an abundant, ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complex, in the cellular response to spontaneous and induced DNA damage. RSC physically interacts with the recombination protein Rad59 and functions in homologous recombination. Multiple recombination assays revealed that RSC is uniquely required for recombination between sister chromatids by virtue of its ability to recruit cohesin at DNA breaks and thereby promoting sister chromatid cohesion. This study provides molecular insights into how chromatin remodeling contributes to DNA repair and maintenance of chromatin fidelity in the face of DNA damage.     

Excision repair of pyrimidine dimers from simian virus 40 minichromosomes in vitro

The ability of DNA repair enzymes to carry out excision repair of pyrimidine dimers in SV40 minichromosomes irradiated with 16 to 64 J/m2 of UV light was examined. Half of the dimers were substrate for the DNA glycosylase activity of phage T4 UV endonuclease immediately after irradiation, but this limit decreased to 27% after 2 h at 0 degrees C. Moreover, the apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease activity of the enzyme did not incise all of the AP sites created by glycosylase activity, although all AP sites were substrate for HeLa AP endonuclease II. The initial rate of the glycosylase was 40% that upon DNA. After incision by the T4 enzyme, excision was mediated by HeLa DNase V (acting with an exonuclease present in the chromatin preparation). Under physiological salt conditions, excision did not proceed appreciably beyond the damaged nucleotides in DNA or chromatin. With chromatin, about 70% of the accessible dimers were removed, but at a rate slower than for DNA. Finally, HeLa DNA polymerase beta was able to fill the short gaps created after dimer excision, and these patches were sealed by T4 DNA ligase. Overall, roughly 30% of the sites incised by the endonuclease were ultimately sealed by the ligase. The resistance of some sites was due to interference with the ligase by the chromatin structure, as only 30-40% of the nicks created in chromatin by pancreatic DNase could be sealed by T4 or HeLa DNA ligases. The overall excision repair process did not detectably disrupt the chromatin structure, since the repair label was recovered in Form I DNA present in 75 S condensed minichromosomes. Although other factors might stimulate the rate of this repair process, it appears that the enzymes utilized could carry out excision repair of chromatin to a limit near that observed at the initial rate in mammalian cells in vivo.     

Shaping chromatin for repair

To counteract the adverse effects of various DNA lesions, cells have evolved an array of diverse repair pathways to restore DNA structure and to coordinate repair with cell cycle regulation. Chromatin changes are an integral part of the DNA damage response, particularly with regard to the types of repair that involve assembly of large multiprotein complexes such as those involved in double strand break (DSB) repair and nucleotide excision repair (NER). A number of phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, ubiquitylation and chromatin remodeling events modulate chromatin structure at the lesion site. These changes demarcate chromatin neighboring the lesion, afford accessibility and binding surfaces to repair factors and provide on-the-spot means to coordinate repair and damage signaling. Thus, the hierarchical assembly of repair factors at a double strand break is mostly due to their regulated interactions with posttranslational modifications of histones. A large number of chromatin remodelers are required at different stages of DSB repair and NER. Remodelers physically interact with proteins involved in repair processes, suggesting that chromatin remodeling is a requisite for repair factors to access the damaged site. Together, recent findings define the roles of histone post-translational modifications and chromatin remodeling in the DNA damage response and underscore possible differences in the requirements for these events in relation to the chromatin context.     

Site-specific repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in a positioned nucleosome by photolyase and T4 endonuclease V in vitro.

Since genomic DNA is folded into nucleosomes, and DNA damage is generated all over the genome, a central question is how DNA repair enzymes access DNA lesions and how they cope with nucleosomes. To investigate this topic, we used a reconstituted nucleosome (HISAT nucleosome) as a substrate to generate DNA lesions by UV light (cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, CPDs), and DNA photolyase and T4 endonuclease V (T4-endoV) as repair enzymes. The HISAT nucleosome is positioned precisely and contains a long polypyrimidine region which allows one to monitor formation and repair of CPDs over three helical turns. Repair by photolyase and T4-endoV was inefficient in nucleosomes compared with repair in naked DNA. However, both enzymes showed a pronounced site-specific modulation of repair on the nucleosome surface. Removal of the histone tails did not substantially enhance repair efficiency nor alter the site specificity of repair. Although photolyase and T4-endoV are different enzymes with different mechanisms, they exhibited a similar site specificity in nucleosomes. This implies that the nucleosome structure has a decisive role in DNA repair by exerting a strong constraint on damage accessibility. These findings may serve as a model for damage recognition and repair by more complex repair mechanisms in chromatin.     

UV Damage in DNA Promotes Nucleosome Unwrapping

The association of DNA with histones in chromatin impedes DNA repair enzymes from accessing DNA lesions. Nucleosomes exist in a dynamic equilibrium in which portions of the DNA molecule spontaneously unwrap, transiently exposing buried DNA sites. Thus, nucleosome dynamics in certain regions of chromatin may provide the exposure time and space needed for efficient repair of buried DNA lesions. We have used FRET and restriction enzyme accessibility to study nucleosome dynamics following DNA damage by UV radiation. We find that FRET efficiency is reduced in a dose-dependent manner, showing that the presence of UV photoproducts enhances spontaneous unwrapping of DNA from histones. Furthermore, this UV-induced shift in unwrapping dynamics is associated with increased restriction enzyme accessibility of histone-bound DNA after UV treatment. Surprisingly, the increased unwrapping dynamics is even observed in nucleosome core particles containing a single UV lesion at a specific site. These results highlight the potential for increased “intrinsic exposure” of nucleosome-associated DNA lesions in chromatin to repair proteins.     

Effect of the antitumor antibiotic bleomycin on DNA polymerase activity

Treatment with bleomycin activates considerably a repair synthesis of DNA in rat liver chromatin in vitro and can cause loosening of the nucleoprotein complex, which facilitates the accessibility or repair enzymes for lesions in chromatin DNA. The bleomycin action on DNA-template increases severalfold the rate of synthesis catalyzed by DNA polymerase beta inhibits the activity of DNA polymerase I from Escherichia coli and suppresses severalfold the activity of DNA polymerase alpha and DNA polymerase of bacteriophage T4. The effect of bleomycin consists in a prevailing increase of nicks and minimal gaps in DNA as compared to the rise of moderate gaps, thus suggesting that bleomycin is a gamma-mimetic.