PATJ, a tight junction-associated PDZ protein, is a novel degradation target of high-risk human papillomavirus E6 and the alternatively spliced isoform 18 E6

The E6 protein from high-risk human papillomavirus types interacts with and degrades several PDZ domain-containing proteins that localize to adherens junctions or tight junctions in polarized epithelial cells. We have identified the tight junction-associated multi-PDZ protein PATJ (PALS1-associated TJ protein) as a novel binding partner and degradation target of high-risk types 16 and 18 E6. PATJ functions in the assembly of the evolutionarily conserved CRB-PALS1-PATJ and Par6-aPKC-Par3 complexes and is critical for the formation of tight junctions in polarized cells. The ability of type 18 E6 full-length to bind to, and the subsequent degradation of, PATJ is dependent on its C-terminal PDZ binding motif. We demonstrate that the spliced 18 E6* protein, which lacks a C-terminal PDZ binding motif, associates with and degrades PATJ independently of full-length 18 E6. Thus, PATJ is the first binding partner that is degraded in response to both isoforms of 18 E6. The ability of E6 to utilize a non-E6AP ubiquitin ligase for the degradation of several PDZ binding partners has been suggested. We also demonstrate that 18 E6-mediated degradation of PATJ is not inhibited in cells where E6AP is silenced by shRNA. This suggests that the E6-E6AP complex is not required for the degradation of this protein target.     

Inhibition of E6-induced degradation of its cellular substrates by novel blocking peptides

The E6 oncoprotein derived from the tumour-associated human papillomavirus (HPV) types induces the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of several cellular proteins by conjugating them with the cellular ubiquitin ligase E6-AP. This is a HECT domain-containing ligase that was originally identified through its involvement in the E6-mediated degradation of the cellular tumour suppressor protein p53. Here we have investigated, in more detail, the nature of the E6/E6-AP interaction using binding peptides isolated from an E6-specific library. The selected peptides were either predicted or shown to have an alpha-helical core resembling the E6-binding motif on E6-AP, as well as amino acid alterations that increased their affinity for E6. These peptides were potent inhibitors of the E6/E6-AP interaction. Further analysis of the effects of these peptides on the ability of E6 to direct the proteolytic degradation of its various substrates, including p53, Dlg and the MAGI family of proteins, as well as using E6-AP immunodepletion, revealed striking differences in the mechanism by which E6 targets its cellular substrates for degradation. These results suggest that the site on E6 bound by E6-AP is also most likely occupied by other, as yet unidentified, ubiquitin ligases.     

Identification of paramyxovirus V protein residues essential for STAT protein degradation and promotion of virus replication

Some paramyxovirus V proteins induce STAT protein degradation, and the amino acids essential for this process in the human parainfluenza virus type 2 (hPIV2) V protein have been studied. Various recombinant hPIV2s and cell lines constitutively expressing various mutant V proteins were generated. We found that V proteins with replacement of Cys residues of the Cys cluster were still able to bind STATs but were unable to induce their degradation. The hPIV2 V protein binds STATs via a W-(X)3-W-(X)9-W Trp motif located just upstream of the Cys cluster. Replacements of two or more Trp residues in this motif resulted in a failure to form a V/STAT2 complex. We have also identified two Phe residues of the hPIV2 V protein that are essential for STAT degradation, namely, Phe207, lying within the Cys cluster, and Phe143, in the P/V common region of the protein. Interestingly, infection of BHK cells with hPIV2 led to the specific degradation of STAT1 and not STAT2. Other evidence for the cell species specificity of hPIV2-induced STAT degradation is presented. Finally, a V-minus hPIV2, which can express only the P protein from its P gene, was generated and partially characterized. In contrast to V-minus viruses of other paramyxovirus genera, this V-minus rubulavirus was highly debilitated, and its growth even in Vero cells was very limited. The structural rubulavirus V proteins, as expected, are thus clearly important in promoting virus growth, independent of their anti-interferon (IFN) activity. Interestingly, many of the residues that are essential for anti-IFN activity, e.g., the Cys of this cluster and Phe207 within this cluster, as well as the Trp of this motif, are also essential for promoting virus growth.