Ribosomal protein-dependent orientation of the 16 S rRNA environment of S15

Ribosomal protein S15 binds specifically to the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA (16 S rRNA) and directs the assembly of four additional proteins to this domain. The central domain of 16 S rRNA along with these five proteins form the platform of the 30 S subunit. Previously, directed hydroxyl radical probing from Fe(II)-S15 in small ribonucleoprotein complexes was used to study assembly of the central domain of 16 S rRNA. Here, this same approach was used to understand the 16 S rRNA environment of Fe(II)-S15 in 30 S subunits and to determine the ribosomal proteins that are involved in forming the mature S15-16 S rRNA environment. We have identified additional sites of Fe(II)-S15-directed cleavage in 30S subunits compared to the binary complex of Fe(II)-S15/16 S rRNA. Along with novel targets in the central domain, sites within the 5' and 3' minor domains are also cleaved. This suggests that during the course of 30S subunit assembly these elements are positioned in the vicinity of S15. Besides the previously determined role for S8, roles for S5, S6+S18, and S16 in altering the 16 S rRNA environment of S15 were established. These studies reveal that ribosomal proteins can alter the assembly of regions of the 30 S subunit from a considerable distance and influence the overall conformation of this ribonucleoprotein particle.     

Assembly of the 5' and 3' minor domains of 16S ribosomal RNA as monitored by tethered probing from ribosomal protein S20

The ribosomal protein (r-protein) S20 is a primary binding protein. As such, it interacts directly and independently with the 5′ domain as well as the 3′ minor domain of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in minimal particles and the fully assembled 30S subunit. The interactions observed between r-protein S20 and the 5′ domain of 16S rRNA are quite extensive, while those between r-protein S20 and the 3′ minor domain are significantly more limited. In this study, directed hydroxyl radical probing mediated by Fe(II)-derivatized S20 proteins was used to monitor the folding of 16S rRNA during r-protein association and 30S subunit assembly. An analysis of the cleavage patterns in the minimal complexes [16S rRNA and Fe(II)-S20] and the fully assembled 30S subunit containing the same Fe(II)-derivatized proteins shows intriguing similarities and differences. These results suggest that the two domains, 5′ and 3′ minor, are organized relative to S20 at different stages of assembly. The 5′ domain acquires, in a less complex ribonucleoprotein particle than the 3′ minor domain, the same architecture as observed in mature subunits. These results are similar to what would be predicted of subunit assembly by the 5′-to-3′ direction assembly model.     

Analysis of conformational changes in 16 S rRNA during the course of 30 S subunit assembly

Ribosome biogenesis involves an integrated series of binding events coupled with conformational changes that ultimately result in the formation of a functional macromolecular complex. In vitro, Escherichia coli 30 S subunit assembly occurs in a cooperative manner with the ordered addition of 20 ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) with 16 S rRNA. The assembly pathway for 30 S subunits has been dissected in vitro into three steps, where specific r-proteins associate with 16 S rRNA early in 30 S subunit assembly, followed by a mid-assembly conformational rearrangement of the complex that then enables the remaining r-proteins to associate in the final step. Although the three steps of 30 S subunit assembly have been known for some time, few details have been elucidated about changes that occur as a result of these three specific stages. Here, we present a detailed analysis of the concerted early and late stages of small ribosomal subunit assembly. Conformational changes, roles for base-pairing and r-proteins at specific stages of assembly, and a polar nature to the assembly process have been revealed. This work has allowed a more comprehensive and global view of E.coli 30 S ribosomal subunit assembly to be obtained.     

Interdependencies govern multidomain architecture in ribosomal small subunit assembly

The 30S subunit is composed of four structural domains, the body, platform, head, and penultimate/ultimate stems. The functional integrity of the 30S subunit is dependent upon appropriate assembly and precise orientation of all four domains. We examined 16S rRNA conformational changes during in vitro assembly using directed hydroxyl radical probing mediated by Fe(II)-derivatized ribosomal protein (r-protein) S8. R-protein S8 binds the central domain of 16S rRNA directly and independently and its iron derivatized substituents have been shown to mediate cleavage in three domains of 16S rRNA, thus making it an ideal probe to monitor multidomain orientation during assembly. Cleavages in minimal ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles formed with Fe(II)-S8 and 16S rRNA alone were compared with that in the context of the fully assembled subunit. The minimal binding site of S8 at helix 21 exists in a structure similar to that observed in the mature subunit, in the absence of other r-proteins. However, the binding site of S8 at the junction of helices 25-26a, which is transcribed after helix 21, is cleaved with differing intensities in the presence and absence of other r-proteins. Also, assembly of the body helps establish an architecture approximating, but perhaps not identical, to the 30S subunit at helix 12 and the 5' terminus. Moreover, the assembly or orientation of the neck is dependent upon assembly of both the head and the body. Thus, a complex interrelationship is observed between assembly events of independent domains and the incorporation of primary binding proteins during 30S subunit formation.     

Mutual induced fit binding of Xenopus ribosomal protein L5 to 5S rRNA

A library of random mutations in Xenopus ribosomal protein L5 was generated by error-prone PCR and used to delineate the binding domain for 5S rRNA. All but one of the amino acid substitutions that affected binding affinity are clustered in the central region of the protein. Several of the mutations are conservative substitutions of non-polar amino acid residues that are unlikely to form energetically significant contacts to the RNA. Thermal denaturation, monitored by circular dichroism (CD), indicates that L5 is not fully structured and association with 5S rRNA increases the t(m) of the protein by 16 degrees C. L5 induces changes in the CD spectrum of 5S rRNA, establishing that the complex forms by a mutual induced fit mechanism. Deuterium exchange reveals that a considerable amount of L5 is unstructured in the absence of 5S rRNA. The fluorescence emission of W266 provides evidence for structural changes in the C-terminal region of L5 upon binding to 5S rRNA; whereas, protection experiments demonstrate that the N terminus remains highly sensitive to protease digestion in the complex. Analysis of the amino acid sequence of L5 by the program PONDR predicts that the N and C-terminal regions of L5 are intrinsically disordered, but that the central region, which contains three essential tyrosine residues and other residues important for binding to 5S rRNA, is likely to be structured. Initial interaction of the protein with 5S rRNA likely occurs through this region, followed by induced folding of the C-terminal region. The persistent disorder in the N-terminal domain is possibly exploited for interactions between the L5-5S rRNA complex and other proteins.     

Temperature-dependent RNP conformational rearrangements: analysis of binary complexes of primary binding proteins with 16 S rRNA

Ribonucleoprotein particles (RNPs) are important components of all living systems, and the assembly of these particles is an intricate, often multistep, process. The 30 S ribosomal subunit is composed of one large RNA (16 S rRNA) and 21 ribosomal proteins (r-proteins). In vitro studies have revealed that assembly of the 30 S subunit is a temperature-dependent process involving sequential binding of r-proteins and conformational changes of 16 S rRNA. Additionally, a temperature-dependent conformational rearrangement was reported for a complex of primary r-protein S4 and 16 S rRNA. Given these observations, a systematic study of the temperature-dependence of 16 S rRNA architecture in individual complexes with the other five primary binding proteins (S7, S8, S15, S17, and S20) was performed. While all primary binding r-proteins bind 16 S rRNA at low temperature, not all r-proteins/16 S rRNA complexes undergo temperature-dependent conformational rearrangements. Some RNPs achieve the same conformation regardless of temperature, others show minor adjustments in 16 S rRNA conformation upon heating and, finally, others undergo significant temperature-dependent changes. Some of the architectures achieved in these rearrangements are consistent with subsequent downstream assembly events such as assembly of the secondary and tertiary binding r-proteins. The differential interaction of 16 S rRNA with r-proteins illustrates a means for controlling the sequential assembly pathway for complex RNPs and may offer insights into aspects of RNP assembly in general.     

Central domain assembly: thermodynamics and kinetics of S6 and S18 binding to an S15-RNA complex

The 30 S ribosomal subunit assembles in vitro through the hierarchical binding of 21 ribosomal proteins to 16 S rRNA. The central domain of 16 S rRNA becomes the platform of the 30 S subunit upon binding of ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S11, S15, S18 and S21. The assembly of the platform is nucleated by binding of S15 to 16 S rRNA, followed by the cooperative binding of S6 and S18. The prior binding of S6 and S18 is required for binding of S11 and S21. We have studied the mechanism of the cooperative binding of S6 and S18 to the S15-rRNA complex by isothermal titration calorimetry and gel mobility shift assays with rRNA and proteins from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus. S6 and S18 form a stable heterodimer in solution with an apparent dissociation constant of 8.7 nM at 40 degrees C. The S6:S18 heterodimer binds to the S15-rRNA complex with an equilibrium dissociation constant of 2.7 nM at 40 degrees C. Consistent with previous studies using rRNA and proteins from Escherichia coli, we observed no binding of S6 or S18 in the absence of the other protein or S15. The presence of S15 increases the affinity of S6:S18 for the RNA by at least four orders of magnitude. The kinetics of S6:S18 binding to the S15-rRNA complex are slow, with an apparent bimolecular rate constant of 8.0 x 10(4) M(-1) s(-1) and an apparent unimolecular dissociation rate of 1.6 x 10(-4) s(-1). These results, which are consistent with a model in which S6 and S18 bind as a heterodimer to the S15-rRNA complex, provide a mechanistic framework to describe the previously observed S15-mediated cooperative binding of S6 and S18 in the ordered assembly of a multi-protein ribonucleoprotein complex.     

Interaction of ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 with the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli

The co-operative interaction of 30 S ribosomal subunit proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 with 16 S ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli was studied by (1) determining how the binding of each protein is influenced by the others and (2) characterizing a series of protein-rRNA fragment complexes. Whereas S8 and S15 are known to associate independently with the 16 S rRNA, binding of S18 depended upon S8 and S15, and binding of S6 was found to require S8, S15 and S18. Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) fragments were derived from the S8-, S8/S15- and S6/S8/S15/S18-16 S rRNA complexes by partial RNase hydrolysis and isolated by electrophoresis through Mg2+-containing polyacrylamide gels or by centrifugation through sucrose gradients. Identification of the proteins associated with each RNP by gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate demonstrated the presence of S8, S8 + S15 and S6 + S8 + S15 + S18 in the corresponding fragment complexes. Analysis of the rRNA components of the RNP particles confirmed that S8 was bound to nucleotides 583 to 605 and 624 to 653, and that S8 and S15 were associated with nucleotides 583 to 605, 624 to 672 and 733 to 757. Proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 were shown to protect nucleotides 563 to 605, 624 to 680, 702 to 770, 818 to 839 and 844 to 891, which span the entire central domain of the 16 S rRNA molecule (nucleotides 560 to 890). The binding site for each protein contains helical elements as well as single-stranded internal loops ranging in size from a single bulged nucleotide to 20 bases. Three terminal loops and one stem-loop structure within the central domain of the 16 S rRNA were not protected in the four-protein complex. Interestingly, bases within or very close to these unprotected regions have been shown to be accessible to chemical and enzymatic probes in 30 S subunits but not in 70 S ribosomes. Furthermore, nucleotides adjacent to one of the unprotected loops have been cross-linked to a region near the 3' end of 16 S rRNA. Our observations and those of others suggest that the bases in this domain that are not sequestered by interactions with S6, S8, S15 or S18 play a role involved in subunit association or in tertiary interactions between portions of the rRNA chain that are distant from one-another in the primary structure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

30S ribosomal subunits can be assembled in vivo without primary binding ribosomal protein S15

Assembly of 30S ribosomal subunits from Escherichia coli has been dissected in detail using an in vitro system. Such studies have allowed characterization of the role for ribosomal protein S15 in the hierarchical assembly of 30S subunits; S15 is a primary binding protein that orchestrates the assembly of ribosomal proteins S6, S11, S18, and S21 with the central domain of 16S ribosomal RNA to form the platform of the 30S subunit. In vitro S15 is the sole primary binding protein in this cascade, performing a critical role during assembly of these four proteins. To investigate the role of S15 in vivo, the essential nature of rpsO, the gene encoding S15, was examined. Surprisingly, E. coli with an in-frame deletion of rpsO are viable, although at 37 degrees C this DeltarpsO strain has an exaggerated doubling time compared to its parental strain. In the absence of S15, the remaining four platform proteins are assembled into ribosomes in vivo, and the overall architecture of the 30S subunits formed in the DeltarpsO strain at 37 degrees C is not altered. Nonetheless, 30S subunits lacking S15 appear to be somewhat defective in subunit association in vivo and in vitro. In addition, this strain is cold sensitive, displaying a marked ribosome biogenesis defect at low temperature, suggesting that under nonideal conditions S15 is critical for assembly. The viability of this strain indicates that in vivo functional populations of 70S ribosomes must form in the absence of S15 and that 30S subunit assembly has a plasicity that has not previously been revealed or characterized.     

Assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit: positioning ribosomal protein S13 in the S7 assembly branch

Studies of Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunit assembly have revealed a hierarchical and cooperative association of ribosomal proteins with 16S ribosomal RNA; these results have been used to compile an in vitro 30S subunit assembly map. In single protein addition and omission studies, ribosomal protein S13 was shown to be dependent on the prior association of ribosomal protein S20 for binding to the ribonucleoprotein particle. While the overwhelming majority of interactions revealed in the assembly map are consistent with additional data, the dependency of S13 on S20 is not. Structural studies position S13 in the head of the 30S subunit > 100 A away from S20, which resides near the bottom of the body of the 30S subunit. All of the proteins that reside in the head of the 30S subunit, except S13, have been shown to be part of the S7 assembly branch, that is, they all depend on S7 for association with the assembling 30S subunit. Given these observations, the assembly requirements for S13 were investigated using base-specific chemical footprinting and primer extension analysis. These studies reveal that S13 can bind to 16S rRNA in the presence of S7, but not S20. Additionally, interaction between S13 and other members of the S7 assembly branch have been observed. These results link S13 to the 3' major domain family of proteins, and the S7 assembly branch, placing S13 in a new location in the 30S subunit assembly map where its position is in accordance with much biochemical and structural data.     

Interaction of proteins S16, S17 and S20 with 16 S ribosomal RNA

We have used rapid chemical probing methods to examine the effect of assembly of ribosomal proteins S16, S17 and S20 on the reactivity of individual residues of 16 S rRNA. Protein S17 strongly protects a compact region of the RNA between positions 245 and 281, a site previously assigned to binding of S20. Protein S20 also protects many of these same positions, albeit more weakly than S17. Strong S20-dependent protections are seen elsewhere in the 5' domain, most notably at positions 108, and in the 160-200 and 330 loop regions. Enenpectedly, S20 also causes protection of several bases in the 1430-1450 region, in the 3' minor domain. In the presence of the primary binding proteins S4, S8 and S20, we observe a variety of effects that result from assembly of the secondary binding protein S16. Most strongly protected are nucleotides around positions 50, 120, 300 to 330 and 360 in the 5' domain, and positions 606 to 630 in the central domain. In addition, numerous nucleotides in the 5' and central domains exhibit enhanced reactivity in response to S16. Interestingly, the strength of the S20-dependent effects in the 1430-1450 region is attenuated in the presence of S4 + S8 + S20, and restored in the presence of S4 + S8 + S20 + S16. Finally, the previously observed rearrangement of the 300 region stem-loop that occurs during assembly is shown to be an S16-dependent event. We discuss these findings with respect to assignment of RNA binding sites for these proteins, and in regard to the co-operativity of ribosome assembly.     

Role of N-terminal helix in interaction of ribosomal protein S15 with 16S rRNA

The position and conformation of the N-terminal helix of free ribosomal protein S15 was earlier found to be modified under various conditions. This variability was supposed to provide the recognition by the protein of its specific site on 16S rRNA. To test this hypothesis, we substituted some amino acid residues in this helix and assessed effects of these substitutions on the affinity of the protein for 16S rRNA. The crystal structure of the complex of one of these mutants (Thr3Cys S15) with the 16S rRNA fragment was determined, and a computer model of the complex containing another mutant (Gln8Met S15) was designed. The available and new information was analyzed in detail, and the N-terminal helix was concluded to play no significant role in the specific binding of the S15 protein to its target on 16S rRNA.     

Functional studies of the 900 tetraloop capping helix 27 of 16S ribosomal RNA

The 900 tetraloop (positions 898-901) of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA caps helix 27, which is involved in a conformational switch crucial for the decoding function of the ribosome. This tetraloop forms a GNRA motif involved in intramolecular RNA-RNA interactions with its receptor in helix 24 of 16S rRNA. It is involved also in an intersubunit bridge, via an interaction with helix 67 in domain IV of 23S rRNA. Using a specialized ribosome system and an instant-evolution procedure, the four nucleotides of this loop were randomized and 15 functional mutants were selected in vivo. Positions 899 and 900, responsible for most of the tetraloop/receptor interactions, were found to be the most critical for ribosome activity. Functional studies showed that mutations in the 900 tetraloop impair subunit association and decrease translational fidelity. Computer modeling of the mutations allows correlation of the effect of mutations with perturbations of the tetraloop/receptor interactions.     

Interaction of ribosomal proteins, S6, S8, S15 and S18 with the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA

We have constructed complexes of ribosomal proteins S8, S15, S8 + S15 and S8 + S15 + S6 + S18 with 16 S ribosomal RNA, and probed the RNA moiety with a set of structure-specific chemical and enzymatic probes. Our results show the following effects of assembly of proteins on the reactivity of specific nucleotides in 16 S rRNA. (1) In agreement with earlier work, S8 protects nucleotides in and around the 588-606/632-651 stem from attack by chemical probes; this is supported by protection in and around these same regions from nucleases. In addition, we observe protection of positions 573-575, 583, 812, 858-861 and 865. Several S8-dependent enhancements of reactivity are found, indicating that assembly of this protein is accompanied by conformational changes in 16 S rRNA. These results imply that protein S8 influences a much larger region of the central domain than was previously suspected. (2) Protein S15 protects nucleotides in the 655-672/734-751 stem, in agreement with previous findings. We also find S15-dependent protection of nucleotides in the 724-730 region. Assembly of S15 causes several enhancements of reactivity, the most striking of which are found at G664, A665, G674, and A718. (3) The effects of proteins S6 and S18 are dependent on the simultaneous presence of both proteins, and on the presence of protein S15. S6 + S18-dependent protections are located in the 673-730 and 777-803 regions. We observed some variability in our results with these proteins, depending on the ratio of protein to RNA used, and in different trials using enzymatic probes, possibly due to the limited solubility of protein S18. Consistently reproducible was protection of nucleotides in the 664-676 and 715-729 regions. Among the latter are three of the nucleotides (G664, G674 and A718) that are strongly enhanced by assembly of protein S15. This result suggests that an S15-induced conformational change involving these nucleotides may play a role in the co-operative assembly of proteins S6 and S18.     

Specific contacts between protein S4 and ribosomal RNA are required at multiple stages of ribosome assembly

Assembly of bacterial 30S ribosomal subunits requires structural rearrangements to both its 16S rRNA and ribosomal protein components. Ribosomal protein S4 nucleates 30S assembly and associates rapidly with the 5′ domain of the 16S rRNA. In vitro, transformation of initial S4–rRNA complexes to long-lived, mature complexes involves refolding of 16S helix 18, which forms part of the decoding center. Here we use targeted mutagenesis of Geobacillus stearothermophilus S4 to show that remodeling of S4–rRNA complexes is perturbed by ram alleles associated with reduced translational accuracy. Gel mobility shift assays, SHAPE chemical probing, and in vivo complementation show that the S4 N-terminal extension is required for RNA binding and viability. Alanine substitutions in Y47 and L51 that interact with 16S helix 18 decrease S4 affinity and destabilize the helix 18 pseudoknot. These changes to the protein–RNA interface correlate with no growth (L51A) or cold-sensitive growth, 30S assembly defects, and accumulation of 17S pre-rRNA (Y47A). A third mutation, R200A, over-stabilizes the helix 18 pseudoknot yet results in temperature-sensitive growth, indicating that complex stability is finely tuned by natural selection. Our results show that early S4–RNA interactions guide rRNA folding and impact late steps of 30S assembly.     

Slow formation of stable complexes during coincubation of minimal rRNA and ribosomal protein S4

Ribosomal protein S4 binds and stabilizes a five-helix junction or five-way junction (5WJ) in the 5′ domain of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and is one of two proteins responsible for nucleating 30S ribosome assembly. Upon binding, both protein S4 and 5WJ reorganize their structures. We show that labile S4 complexes rearrange into stable complexes within a few minutes at 42 °C, with longer coincubation leading to an increased population of stable complexes. In contrast, prefolding the rRNA has a smaller effect on stable S4 binding. Experiments with minimal rRNA fragments show that this structural change depends only on 16S residues within the S4 binding site. SHAPE (selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension) chemical probing experiments showed that S4 strongly stabilizes 5WJ and the helix (H) 18 pseudoknot, which become tightly folded within the first minute of S4 binding. However, a kink in H16 that makes specific contacts with the S4 N-terminal extension, as well as a right-angle motif between H3, H4, and H18, requires a minute or more to become fully structured. Surprisingly, S4 structurally reorganizes the 530-loop and increases the flexibility of H3, which is proposed to undergo a conformational switch during 30S assembly. These elements of the S4 binding site may require other 30S proteins to reach a stable conformation.     

The binding interface between Bacillus stearothermophilus ribosomal protein S15 and its 5'-translational operator mRNA

The Bacillus stearothermophilus ribosomal protein S15 (BS15) binds a purine-rich three-helix junction motif in the central domain of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) as well as a translational operator located in the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) of its cognate messenger RNA (mRNA). An in-frame fusion between the 5'-UTR of the BS15 gene and beta-galactosidase (lacZ) was prepared, and tested for BS15-dependent translational repression of lacZ activity in Escherichia coli. The presence of BS15 in trans represses lacZ activity 24-fold. A series of detailed point mutations in BS15 were tested for their effects upon translational repression of lacZ activity. These point mutations demonstrated that the 5'-UTR-BS15 binding interface utilizes many of the same conserved amino acid residues implicated in the binding of BS15 to 16S rRNA. The data demonstrate that the S15 protein can bind to an RNA target motif based primarily upon appropriate minor groove and sugar-phosphate backbone contacts, irrespective of the specific RNA sequence.     

Protein-induced conformational changes in 16 S ribosomal RNA during the initial assembly steps of the Escherichia coli 30 S ribosomal subunit

The mechanism of 16 S ribosomal RNA folding into its compact form in the native 30 S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli was studied by scanning transmission electron microscopy and circular dichroism spectroscopy. This approach made it possible to visualize and quantitatively analyze the conformational changes induced in 16 S rRNA under various ionic conditions and to characterize the interactions of ribosomal proteins S4, S8, S15, S20, S17 and S7, the six proteins known to bind to 16 S rRNA in the initial assembly steps. 16 S rRNA and the reconstituted RNA-protein core particles were characterized by their mass, morphology, radii of gyration (RG), and the extent and stability of 16 S rRNA secondary structure. The stepwise binding of S4, S8 and S15 led to a corresponding increase of mass and was accompanied by increased folding of 16 S rRNA in the core particles, as evident from the electron micrographs and from the decrease of RG values from 114 A and 91 A. Although the binding of S20, S17 and S7 continued the trend of mass increase, the RG values of these core particles showed a variable trend. While there was a slight increase in the RG value of the S20 core particles to 94 A, the RG value remained unchanged (94 A) with the further addition of S17. With subsequent addition of S7 to the core particles, the RG values showed an increase to 108 A. Association with S7 led to the formation of a globular mass cluster with a diameter of about 115 A and a mass of about 300 kDa. The rest of the mass (about 330 kDa) remained loosely coiled, giving the core particle a "medusa-like" appearance. Morphology of the 16 S rRNA and 16 S rRNA-protein core particles, even those with all six proteins, does not resemble the native 30 S subunit, contrary to what has been reported by others. The circular dichroism spectra of the 16 S rRNA-protein complexes and of free 16 S rRNA indicate a similarity of RNA secondary structure in the core particles with the first four proteins, S4, S8, S15, S20. The circular dichroism melting profiles of these core particles show only insignificant variations, implying no obvious changes in the distribution or the stability of the helical segments of 16 S rRNA. However, subsequent binding of proteins S17 and S7 affected both the extent and the thermal stability of 16 S rRNA secondary structure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)