Arrestin isoforms dictate differential kinetics of A2B adenosine receptor trafficking

Adenosine mediates the activation of adenylyl cyclase via its interaction with specific A(2A) and A(2B) adenosine receptors. Previously, we demonstrated that arrestins are involved in rapid agonist-promoted desensitization of the A(2B) adenosine receptor (A(2B)AR) in HEK293 cells. In the present study, we investigate the role of arrestins in A(2B)AR trafficking. Initial studies demonstrated that HEK293 cells stably expressing arrestin antisense constructs, which reduce endogenous arrestin levels, effectively reduced A(2B)AR internalization. A(2B)AR recycling after agonist-induced endocytosis was also significantly impaired in cells with reduced arrestin levels. Interestingly, while overexpression of arrestin-2 or arrestin-3 rescued A(2B)AR internalization and recycling, arrestin-3 promoted a significantly faster rate of recycling as compared to arrestin-2. The specificity of arrestin interaction with A(2B)ARs was further investigated using arrestins fused to the green fluorescent protein (arr-2-GFP and arr-3-GFP). Both arrestins underwent rapid translocation (<1 min) from the cytosol to the plasma membrane following A(2B)AR activation. However, longer incubations with agonist (>10 min) revealed that arr-2-GFP but not arr-3-GFP colocalized with the A(2B)AR in rab-5 and transferrin receptor containing early endosomes. At later times, the A(2B)AR but not arr-2-GFP was observed in an apparent endocytic recycling compartment. Thus, while arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 mediate agonist-induced A(2B)AR internalization with relative equal potency, arrestin isoform binding dictates the differential kinetics of A(2B)AR recycling and resensitization.     

5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors and their atypical regulation properties

The 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. GPCRs transduce extracellular signals to the interior of cells through their interaction with G-proteins. The 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors mediate effects of a large variety of compounds affecting depression, schizophrenia, anxiety, hallucinations, dysthymia, sleep patterns, feeding behaviour and neuro-endocrine functions. Binding of such compounds to either 5-HT(2) receptor subtype induces processes that regulate receptor sensitivity. In contrast to most other receptors, chronic blockade of 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors leads not to an up- but to a (paradoxical) down-regulation. This review deals with published data involving such non-classical regulation of 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors obtained from in vivo and in vitro studies. The underlying regulatory processes of the agonist-induced regulation of 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors, commonly thought to be desensitisation and resensitisation, are discussed. The atypical down-regulation of both 5-HT(2) receptor subtypes by antidepressants, antipsychotics and 5-HT(2) antagonists is reviewed. The possible mechanisms of this paradoxical down-regulation are discussed, and a new hypothesis on possible heterologous regulation of 5-HT(2A) receptors is proposed.     

Dynamin and rab5 regulate GRK2-dependent internalization of dopamine D2 receptors.

Dopamine D2 receptors (D2Rs; short form, which is one of the alternative splicing variants) expressed in COS-7 cells are internalized in an agonist-dependent manner only when G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) is coexpressed [Ito, K., Haga, T., Lameh, J. & Sadée, W., (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 260, 112-119]. We have examined the effects of coexpression of dynamin, a small molecular mass GTP-binding protein, rab5A, and their mutants on the internalization of D2Rs in the presence of both dopamine (10 or 100 microM) and GRK2. The rate and extent of D2R internalization was increased or decreased by coexpression of dynamin I or a dominant-negative form of dynamin I (dynamin I K44E), respectively. The effects of coexpressing these two dynamins were more prominent at 10 microM dopamine than at 100 microM. In the presence of 10 microM dopamine, internalization of D2R was completely suppressed when dynamin I K44E was coexpressed, and the half-life (t 1/2) of D2R internalization decreased relative to cells not expressing dynamin from 82 to 29 min when dynamin I was coexpressed. Internalization of D2Rs was facilitated or suppressed by coexpression of a constitutively active form of rab5A (rab5A Q79L) or a dominant-negative form of rab5A (rab5A S34N), respectively. The t 1/2 of D2R internalization at 10 microM dopamine decreased from 82 to 16 min in cells coexpressing rab5A Q79L. The effect of coexpression of rab5A S34N was more apparent at 100 microM dopamine than at 10 microM; the t 1/2 of D2R internalization at 100 microM dopamine increased from 20 to 56 min and the proportion of internalized D2Rs after 120 min decreased from 53 to 28%. These results indicate that the internalization of D2Rs is dependent on the action of dynamin as well as GRK2, and is regulated by the action of rab5A.     

Rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization of the A(2B) adenosine receptor is mediated by a serine residue close to the COOH terminus

The G(s)-coupled rat A(2B) adenosine receptor (A(2B)-AR) was epitope-tagged at the NH(2) terminus with hemagglutinin (HA) and subjected to progressive deletions or point mutations of the COOH terminus in order to determine regions of the receptor that contribute to agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. When expressed stably in Chinese hamster ovary cells, a mutant receptor in which the final 2 amino acids were deleted, the Leu(330)-stop mutant, underwent rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization as did the wild type (WT) receptor. However, the Phe(328) and the Gln(325)-stop mutants were resistant to rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. Co-expression of arrestin-2-green fluorescent protein (arrestin-2-GFP) with WT receptor or Leu(330)-stop mutant resulted in rapid translocation of arrestin-2-GFP from cytosol to membrane upon agonist addition. On the other hand, agonist activation of the Phe(328)-stop or Gln(325)-stop mutant did not result in translocation of arrestin-2-GFP from cytosol. A COOH terminus point mutant, S329G, was also unable to undergo rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization, indicating that Ser(329) is a critical residue for these processes. A further deletion mutant (Ser(326)-stop) unexpectedly underwent rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. However, activation of this mutant did not promote translocation of arrestin-2-GFP from cytosol to membrane. In addition, whereas WT receptor internalization was markedly inhibited by co-expression of dominant negative mutants of arrestin-2 (arrestin-2-(319-418)), dynamin (dynamin K44A), or Eps-15 (EDelta95-295), Ser(326)-stop receptor internalization was only inhibited by dominant negative mutant dynamin. Taken together these results indicate that Ser(329), close to the COOH terminus of the rat A(2B)-AR, is critical for the rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization of the receptor. However, deletion of the COOH terminus also uncovers a motif that is able to redirect internalization of the receptor to an arrestin- and clathrin-independent pathway.     

beta-arrestins regulate interleukin-8-induced CXCR1 internalization.

The functional role of neutrophils during acute inflammatory responses is regulated by two high affinity interleukin-8 receptors (CXCR1 and CXCR2) that are rapidly desensitized and internalized upon binding their cognate chemokine ligands. The efficient re-expression of CXCR1 on the surface of neutrophils following agonist-induced internalization suggests that CXCR1 surface receptor turnover may involve regulatory pathways and intracellular factors similar to those regulating beta2-adrenergic receptor internalization and re-expression. To examine the internalization pathway utilized by ligand-activated CXCR1, a CXCR1-GFP construct was transiently expressed in two different cell lines, HEK 293 and RBL-2H3 cells. While interleukin-8 stimulation promoted CXCR1 sequestration in RBL-2H3 cells, receptor internalization in HEK 293 cells required co-expression of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 and beta-arrestin proteins. The importance of beta-arrestins in CXCR1 internalization was confirmed by the ability of a dominant negative beta-arrestin 1-V53D mutant to block internalization of CXCR1 in RBL-2H3 cells. A role for dynamin was also demonstrated by the lack of CXCR1 internalization in dynamin I-K44A dominant negative mutant-transfected RBL-2H3 cells. Agonist-promoted co-localization of transferrin and CXCR1-GFP in endosomes of RBL-2H3 cells confirmed that receptor internalization occurs via clathrin-coated vesicles. Our data provides a direct link between agonist-induced internalization of CXCR1 and a requirement for G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, beta-arrestins, and dynamin during this process.     

Internalization of the Human Nicotinic Acid Receptor GPR109A Is Regulated by Gi,GRK2, and Arrestin3

Nicotinic acid (niacin) has been widely used as a favorable lipid-lowering drug for several decades, and the orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR109A has been identified to be a receptor for niacin. Mechanistic investigations have shown that as a G_i-coupled receptor, GPR109A inhibits adenylate cyclase activity upon niacin activation, thereby inhibiting free fatty acid liberation. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms that regulate signaling and internalization of GPR109A remain largely unknown. To further characterize GPR109A internalization, we made a construct to express GPR109A fused with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) at its carboxyl-terminal end. In stable GPR109A-EGFP-expressing HEK-293 cells, GPR109A-EGFP was mainly localized at the plasma membrane and was rapidly internalized in a dose- and time-dependent manner upon agonist stimulation. GPR109A internalization was completely blocked by hypertonic sucrose, indicating that GPR109A internalizes via the clathrin-coated pit pathway. Further investigation demonstrated that internalized GPR109A was recycled to the cell surface after the removal of agonist, and recycling of the internalized receptors was not blocked by treatment with acidotropic agents, NH₄Cl and monensin. Pertussis toxin pretreatment not only inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation and intracellular Ca²⁺ mobilization; it also significantly attenuated agonist-promoted GPR109A internalization. Moreover, RNA interference experiments showed that knockdown of GRK2 (G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2) and arrestin3 expression significantly impaired receptor internalization. Taken together, these results indicate that the agonist-induced internalization of GPR109A receptors is regulated by GRK2 and arrestin3 in a pertussis toxin-sensitive manner and that internalized receptor recycling is independent of endosomal acidification.     

Serotonin 4 receptor (5-HT4R) internalization is isoform-specific: Effects of 5-HT and RS67333 on isoforms A and B

Serotonin 4 receptors (5-HT4Rs) are particularly abundant within the limbic system, where they constitute potential targets for the development of novel, rapid acting antidepressants. However, the population of limbic 5-HT4Rs is not homogenous, comprising various isoforms of which 5-HT4(a) and 5-HT4(b) are among the most abundant variants. Sequence divergence at their C-termini is predictive of specificity in isoform signalling and regulation, but the differences, if any, remain ill-defined. The present study compared isoforms 5-HT4(a) and 5-HT4(b) in their ability to undergo endocytic regulation following exposure to 5-HT and to the putatively fast acting antidepressant RS67333. Both ligands differed in their ability to induce internalization of either isoform, 5-HT being more effective than RS67333 in HEK293 cells and in neurons. In contrast, trafficking induced by 5-HT was isoform-specific. In particular, while PKC, GRK2 and βarrestin were necessary for 5-HT4(a)R internalization, sequestration of 5-HT4(b)Rs required PKC but not GRK2 and relied significantly less on βarrestin. After endocytosis, isoform (b) appeared scattered throughout the intracellular compartment and efficiently recycled to the membrane upon agonist removal. Isoform (a) accumulated in the perinuclear compartment and displayed little recycling. Isoform-specific subcellular distribution was present in HEK293 cells and in neurons. In neurons, where internalization by RS67333 was more pronounced than in HEK293 cells, receptors internalized by this ligand followed the same distribution pattern as observed with 5-HT. These results point to isoform-related differences in the way that 5-HTRs respond to different ligands. Such diversity should be taken into account when developing therapeutic agents that target 5-HT4Rs.     

Arrestin 3 mediates endocytosis of CCR7 following ligation of CCL19 but not CCL21

Internalization of ligand bound G protein-coupled receptors, an important cellular function that mediates receptor desensitization, takes place via distinct pathways, which are often unique for each receptor. The C-C chemokine receptor (CCR7) G protein-coupled receptor is expressed on naive T cells, dendritic cells, and NK cells and has two endogenous ligands, CCL19 and CCL21. Following binding of CCL21, 21 +/- 4% of CCR7 is internalized in the HuT 78 human T cell lymphoma line, while 76 +/- 8% of CCR7 is internalized upon binding to CCL19. To determine whether arrestins mediated differential internalization of CCR7/CCL19 vs CCR7/CCL21, we used small interfering RNA (siRNA) to knock down expression of arrestin 2 or arrestin 3 in HuT 78 cells. Independent of arrestin 2 or arrestin 3 expression, CCR7/CCL21 internalized. In contrast, following depletion of arrestin 3, CCR7/CCL19 failed to internalize. To examine the consequence of complete loss of both arrestin 2 and arrestin 3 on CCL19/CCR7 internalization, we examined CCR7 internalization in arrestin 2(-/-)/arrestin 3(-/-) murine embryonic fibroblasts. Only reconstitution with arrestin 3-GFP but not arrestin 2-GFP rescued internalization of CCR7/CCL19. Loss of arrestin 2 or arrestin 3 blocked migration to CCL19 but had no effect on migration to CCL21. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that arrestins do not cluster at the membrane with CCR7 following ligand binding but cap with CCR7 during receptor internalization. These are the first studies that define a role for arrestin 3 in the internalization of a chemokine receptor following binding of one but not both endogenous ligands.     

The serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors interact with specific sets of PDZ proteins

The 5-hydroxytryptamine type 2A (5-HT(2A)) receptor and the 5-HT(2C) receptor are closely related members of the G-protein-coupled receptors activated by serotonin that share very similar pharmacological profiles and cellular signaling pathways. These receptors express a canonical class I PDZ ligand (SXV) at their C-terminal extremity. Here, we have identified proteins that interact with the PDZ ligand of the 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors by a proteomic approach associating affinity chromatography using immobilized synthetic peptides encompassing the PDZ ligand and mass spectrometry. We report that both receptor C termini interact with specific sets of PDZ proteins in vitro. The 5-HT(2C) receptor but not the 5-HT(2A) receptor binds to the Veli-3.CASK.Mint1 ternary complex and to SAP102. In addition, the 5-HT(2C) receptor binds more strongly to PSD-95 and MPP-3 than the 5-HT(2A) receptor. In contrast, a robust interaction between the 5-HT(2A) receptor and the channel-interacting PDZ protein CIPP was found, whereas CIPP did not significantly associate with the 5-HT(2C) receptor. We also show that residues located at the -1 position and upstream the PDZ ligand in the C terminus of the 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) receptors are major determinants in their interaction with specific PDZ proteins. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy studies strongly suggested that these specific interactions also take place in living cells and that the 5-HT(2) receptor-PDZ protein complexes occur in intracellular compartments. The interaction of the 5-HT(2A) and the 5-HT(2C) receptor with specific sets of PDZ proteins may contribute to their different signal transduction properties.     

A direct interaction of PSD-95 with 5-HT2A serotonin receptors regulates receptor trafficking and signal transduction

The serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) 2A receptor (5-HT2A) is an important G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that mediates the effects of hallucinogens and is the target of a number of commonly prescribed medications including atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants, and anxiolytics. The 5-HT2A receptor possesses a canonical Type I PDZ-binding domain (X-Ser/Thr-X-Phi) at the carboxyl terminus and has been predicted, but never demonstrated, to interact with PDZ domain-containing proteins. We discovered that PSD-95, a prototypic PDZ domain-containing protein, directly associates with the 5-HT2A receptor and regulates 5-HT2A receptor-mediated signaling and trafficking in HEK-293 cells. Co-immunoprecipitation studies revealed that the native 5-HT2A receptor, but not a mutant lacking the PDZ-binding domain, interacted directly with PSD-95. The association with PSD-95 enhanced 5-HT2A receptor-mediated signal transduction, a novel action of PSD-95 on GPCRs. The augmentation of 5-HT2A receptor signaling by PSD-95 was not accompanied by alteration in the kinetics of 5-HT2A receptor desensitization but was associated with the inhibition of agonist-induced 5-HT2A receptor internalization. Additional studies demonstrated that 5-HT2A receptor and PSD-95 were co-localized in clusters on the cell surface of HEK-293 cells. Taken together, the present work elucidates novel roles for PSD-95 in regulating the functional activity and intracellular trafficking of 5-HT2A receptors and possibly other GPCRs.     

Regulation and intracellular trafficking pathways of the endothelin receptors

The effects of endothelin (ET) are mediated via the G protein-coupled receptors ET(A) and ET(B). However, the mechanisms of ET receptor desensitization, internalization, and intracellular trafficking are poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to investigate the molecular mechanisms of ET receptor regulation and to characterize the intracellular pathways of ET-stimulated ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. By analysis of ET(A) and ET(B) receptor internalization in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence of overexpressed betaARK, beta-arrestin-1, beta-arrestin-2, or dynamin as well as dominant negative mutants of these regulators, we have demonstrated that both ET receptor subtypes follow an arrestin- and dynamin/clathrin-dependent mechanism of internalization. Fluorescence microscopy of Chinese hamster ovary and COS cells expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged ET receptors revealed that the ET(A) and ET(B) subtypes were targeted to different intracellular routes after ET stimulation. While ET(A)-GFP followed a recycling pathway and colocalized with transferrin in the pericentriolar recycling compartment, ET(B)-GFP was targeted to lysosomes after ET-induced internalization. Both receptor subtypes colocalized with Rab5 in classical early endosomes, indicating that this compartment is a common early intermediate for the two ET receptors during intracellular transport. The distinct intracellular routes of ET-stimulated ET(A) and ET(B) receptors may explain the persistent signal response through the ET(A) receptor and the transient response through the ET(B) receptor. Furthermore, lysosomal targeting of the ET(B) receptor could serve as a biochemical mechanism for clearance of plasma endothelin via this subtype.     

Agonist-induced Internalization of the Caenorhabditis elegans Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor GAR-3 in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells

Many membrane-bound neurotransmitter receptors are known to be internalized by exposure to agonist. This agonist-induced receptor internalization is considered to play important roles in receptor-mediated signaling. Here we investigated the internalization of GAR-3, a Caenorhabditis elegans muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, using cultured mammalian cells. When Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing GAR-3 were treated with carbachol, GAR-3 was internalized in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Approximately 60% of the cell surface receptor was internalized by exposure to 1 mM carbachol for 1 h. Carbachol-induced GAR-3 internalization was suppressed by treatment with hypertonic sucrose, which blocks the formation of clathrin-coated pits. Overexpression of a dominant-negative dynamin mutant (DynK44A), but not of a dominant-negative β-arrestin mutant (Arr319–418), substantially inhibited carbachol-induced internalization of GAR-3. Thus, these data suggest that GAR-3 undergoes agonist-induced internalization via a clathrin- and dynamin-dependent but β-arrestin-independent pathway. Depletion of Ca²⁺ by simultaneous treatment of the cells with BAPTA/AM (Ca²⁺ mobilization blocker) and EGTA (Ca²⁺ influx blocker) almost completely blocked agonist-induced GAR-3 internalization. Moreover, treatment of the cells with the Ca²⁺ ionophore A23187 led to GAR-3 internalization in the absence of agonist. These results indicate that Ca²⁺ plays a critical role in GAR-3 internalization. We tested whether the third intracellular (i3) loop of GAR-3 is involved in agonist-stimulated receptor internalization. A GAR-3 deletion mutant lacking a large central portion of the i3 loop exhibited an internalization pattern comparable to that of the wild type, suggesting that the central i3 loop is not required for the internalization of GAR-3.     

Visualizing differences in ligand-induced beta-arrestin-GFP interactions and trafficking between three recently characterized G protein-coupled receptors

beta-Arrestin 1-GFP or beta-arrestin 2-GFP were coexpressed transiently with G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 within cells stably expressing the orexin-1, apelin or melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH), receptors. In response to agonist ligands both the orexin-1 and apelin receptors were able to rapidly translocate both beta-arrestin 1-GFP and beta-arrestin 2-GFP from cytoplasm to the plasma membrane. For the MCH receptor this was only observed for beta-arrestin 2-GFP. beta-Arrestin 1-GFP translocated by the apelin receptor remained at the plasma membrane during prolonged exposure to ligand even though the receptor became internalized. By contrast, for the orexin-1 receptor, internalization of beta-arrestin 1-GFP within punctate vesicles could be observed for over 60 min in the continued presence of agonist. Co-internalization of the orexin-1 receptor was observed by monitoring the binding and trafficking of TAMRA-(5- and 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine) labelled orexin-A. Subsequent addition of an orexin-1 receptor antagonist resulted in cessation of incorporation of beta-arrestin 1-GFP into vesicles at the plasma membrane and a gradual clearance of beta-arrestin 1-GFP from intracellular vesicles. For the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor the bulk of translocated beta-arrestin 2-GFP was maintained at concentrated foci close to, or at, the plasma membrane. These results demonstrate very distinct features of beta-arrestin-GFP interactions and trafficking for three G protein-coupled receptors for which the natural ligands have only recently been identified and which were thus previously considered as orphan receptors.     

Arrestin specificity for G protein-coupled receptors in human airway smooth muscle.

Despite a widely accepted role of arrestins as "uncouplers" of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, few studies have demonstrated the ability of arrestins to affect second messenger generation by endogenously expressed receptors in intact cells. In this study we demonstrate arrestin specificity for endogenous GPCRs in primary cultures of human airway smooth muscle (HASM). Expression of arrestin-green fluorescent protein (ARR2-GFP or ARR3-GFP) chimeras in HASM significantly attenuated isoproterenol (beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR)-mediated)- and 5'-(N-ethylcarboxamido)adenosine (A2b adenosine receptor-mediated)-stimulated cAMP production, with fluorescent microscopy demonstrating agonist-promoted redistribution of cellular ARR2-GFP into a punctate formation. Conversely, prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2))-mediated cAMP production was unaffected by arrestin-GFP, and PGE(2) had little effect on arrestin-GFP distribution. The pharmacological profile of various selective EP receptor ligands suggested a predominantly EP2 receptor population in HASM. Further analysis in COS-1 cells revealed that ARR2-GFP expression increased agonist-promoted internalization of wild type beta(2)AR and EP4 receptors, whereas EP2 receptors remained resistant to internalization. However, expression of an arrestin whose binding to GPCRs is largely independent of receptor phosphorylation (ARR2(R169E)-GFP) enabled substantial agonist-promoted EP2 receptor internalization, increased beta(2)AR internalization to a greater extent than did ARR2-GFP, yet promoted EP4 receptor internalization to the same degree as did ARR2-GFP. Signaling via endogenous EP4 receptors in CHO-K1 cells was attenuated by ARR2-GFP expression, whereas ARR2(R169E)-GFP expression in HASM inhibited EP2 receptor-mediated cAMP production. These findings demonstrate differential effects of arrestins in altering endogenous GPCR signaling in a physiologically relevant cell type and reveal a variable dependence on receptor phosphorylation in dictating arrestin-receptor interaction.     

Hypothalamic 5-HT functional regulation through 5-HT1A and 5-HT2C receptors during pancreatic regeneration

5-HT receptors are predominantly located in the brain and are involved in pancreatic function and cell proliferation through sympathetic nervous system. The objective of this study was to investigate the role of hypothalamic 5-HT, 5-HT1A and 5-HT2C receptor binding and gene expression in rat model of pancreatic regeneration using 60% pancreatectomy. The pancreatic regeneration was evaluated by 5-HT content, 5-HT1A and 5-HT2C receptor gene expression in the hypothalamus of sham operated, 72 h and 7 days pancreatectomised rats. 5-HT content was quantified by HPLC. 5-HT1A receptor assay was done by using specific agonist [3H]8-OH DPAT. 5-HT2C receptor assay was done by using specific antagonist [3H]mesulergine. The expression of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2C receptor gene was analyzed by RT-PCR. 5-HT content was higher in the hypothalamus of 72 h pancreatectomised rats. 5-HT1A and 5-HT2C receptors were down-regulated in the hypothalamus. RT-PCR analysis revealed decreased 5-HT1A and 5-HT2C receptor mRNA expression. The 5-HT1A and 5-HT2C receptors gene expression in the 7 days pancreatectomised rats reversed to near sham level. This study is the first to identify 5-HT1A and 5-HT2C receptor gene expression in the hypothalamus during pancreatic regeneration in rats. Our results suggest the hypothalamic serotonergic receptor functional regulation during pancreatic regeneration.     

Coupling of agonist-induced AMPA receptor internalization with receptor recycling

Excitatory post-synaptic currents in the CNS are primarily mediated by alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptors in response to glutamate. Internalization of cell-surface receptors has been shown to be one mechanism by which to control receptor function. To test for agonist control of AMPA receptor plasma membrane expression we used biochemical assays to study AMPA receptor internalization and insertion processes. In heterologous cells, we observed a slow constitutive internalization and a rapid agonist-induced internalization of AMPA receptors. To our surprise, however, agonist treatment had no effect on the steady-state levels of AMPA receptors on the cell surface. To examine whether this could be explained by an agonist-induced increase in the insertion rate of AMPA receptors into the plasma membrane we developed an assay to independently measure receptor insertion. Remarkably, agonist treatment of cells also dramatically increased AMPA receptor plasma membrane insertion rates. In addition, using an assay to measure recycling of internalized pools we found that internalized receptors are rapidly recycled to the cell surface. These results suggest that agonist-induced receptor internalization is coupled to increases in receptor recycling. This increase in receptor flux through intracellular pools may allow for rapid changes in receptor surface expression by independent regulatory control of internalization and insertion.     

Differential role of actin,clathrin, and dynamin in Fc gamma receptor-mediated endocytosis and phagocytosis

Clustering of macrophage Fc gamma receptors by multimeric immunoglobulin complexes leads to their internalization. Formation of small aggregates leads to endocytosis, whereas large particulate complexes induce phagocytosis. In RAW-264.7 macrophages, Fc gamma receptor endocytosis was found to be dependent on clathrin and dynamin and insensitive to cytochalasin. Clathrin also associates with nascent phagosomes, and earlier observations suggested that it plays an essential role in phagosome formation. However, we find that phagocytosis of IgG-coated large (> or =3 microm) particles was unaffected by inhibition of dynamin or by reducing the expression of clathrin using antisense mRNA but was eliminated by cytochalasin, implying a distinct mechanism dependent on actin assembly. The uptake of smaller particles (< or =1 microm) was only partially blocked by cytochalasin. Remarkably, the cytochalasin-resistant component was also insensitive to dominant-negative dynamin I and to clathrin antisense mRNA, implying the existence of a third internalization mechanism, independent of actin, dynamin, and clathrin. The uptake of small particles occurred by a process distinct from fluid phase pinocytosis, because it was not inhibited by dominant-negative Rab5. The insensitivity of phagocytosis to dominant-negative dynamin I enabled us to test the role of dynamin in phagosomal maturation. Although internalization of receptors from the plasma membrane was virtually eliminated by the K44A and S45N mutants of dynamin I, clearance of transferrin receptors and of CD18 from maturing phagosomes was unaffected by these mutants. This implies that removal of receptors from the phagosomal membrane occurs by a mechanism that is different from the one mediating internalization of the same receptors at the plasma membrane. These results imply that, contrary to prevailing notions, normal dynamin and clathrin function is not required for phagocytosis and reveal the existence of a component of phagocytosis that is independent of actin and Rab5.     

Modulation of cannabinoid agonist binding by 5-HT in the rat cerebellum

Cross-talk between cannabinoid CB1 and serotonin 5-HT receptors in rat cerebellar membranes was investigated using radioligand binding. In competition against the CB1 antagonist, [3 H]SR141716A, the agonist, WIN 55,212-2 yielded a biphasic isotherm. The majority of binding was to a high-affinity state that was significantly reduced by the GTP analogue, Gpp(NH)p. Interestingly, 5-HT enhanced the high-affinity binding constant of WIN 55,212-2 while attenuating the proportion of high-affinity binding. 5-HT also significantly reduced the proportion of high-affinity binding of the cannabinoid agonist, HU 210, but had no effect on the agonist, CP 55,940. The effect of 5-HT on WIN 55,212-2 binding was inhibited by the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ritanserin as well as Gpp(NH)p, suggesting a dependence on the 5-HT2 receptor and on G protein-receptor interactions, respectively. Subsequent [3 H]WIN 55,212-2 dissociation kinetic experiments revealed that 5-HT promoted a slower-dissociating species of radiolabelled agonist-receptor complex. Our findings support a membrane-delimited cross-talk between two G protein-coupled receptors that are co-localized in certain cells of the central nervous system. Intriguingly, the cannabinoid agonist dependence of the 5-HT modulatory effect suggests that agonist-specific conformations of the CB1 receptor may also be important in determining the extent of this cross-talk.     

Arrestin-mediated ERK activation by gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors: receptor-specific activation mechanisms and compartmentalization

Activation of seven-transmembrane region receptors typically causes their phosphorylation with consequent arrestin binding and desensitization. Arrestins also act as scaffolds, mediating signaling to Raf and ERK and, for some receptors, inhibiting nuclear translocation of ERK. GnRH receptors (GnRHRs) act via Gq/11 to stimulate the phospholipase C/Ca2+/protein kinase C (PKC) cascade and the Raf/MEK/ERK cassette. Uniquely, type I mammalian GnRHRs lack the C-tails that are found in other seven-transmembrane region receptors (including nonmammalian GnRHRs) and are implicated in arrestin binding. Here we have compared ERK signaling by human GnRHRs (hGnRHRs) and Xenopus GnRHRs (XGnRHRs). In HeLa cells, XGnRHRs underwent rapid and arrestin-dependent internalization and caused arrestin/green fluorescent protein (GFP) translocation to the membrane and endosomes, whereas hGnRHRs did not. Internalized XGnRHRs were co-localized with arrestin-GFP, whereas hGnRHRs were not. Both receptors mediated transient ERK phosphorylation and nuclear translocation (revealed by immunohistochemistry or by imaging of co-transfected ERK2-GFP), and for both, ERK phosphorylation was reduced by PKC inhibition but not by inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor autophosphorylation. In the presence of PKC inhibitor, Deltaarrestin-(319-418) blocked XGnRHR-mediated, but not hGnRHR-mediated, ERK phosphorylation. When receptor number was varied, hGnRHRs activated phospholipase C and ERK more efficiently than XGnRHRs but were less efficient at causing ERK2-GFP translocation. At high receptor number, XGnRHRs and hGnRHRs both caused ERK2-GFP translocation to the nucleus, but at low receptor number, XGnRHRs caused ERK2-GFP translocation, whereas hGnRHRs did not. Thus, experiments with XGnRHRs have revealed the first direct evidence of arrestin-mediated (probably G protein-independent) GnRHR signaling, whereas those with hGnRHRs imply that scaffolds other than arrestins can determine GnRHR effects on ERK compartmentalization.     

5-HT(2A) receptors: location and functional analysis in intestines of wild-type and 5-HT(2A) knockout mice

The distribution and function of the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT(2A)) receptor were investigated in the intestines of wild-type (5-HT(2A) +/+) and knockout (5-HT(2A) -/-) mice. In 5-HT(2A) +/+ mice, rats, and guinea pigs, 5-HT(2A) receptor immunoreactivity was found on circular and longitudinal smooth muscle cells, neurons, enterocytes, and Paneth cells. Muscular 5-HT(2A) receptors were concentrated in caveolae; neuronal 5-HT(2A) receptors were found intracellularly and on the plasma membranes of nerve cell bodies and axons. Neuronal 5-HT(2A) immunoreactivity was detected as early as E14 in ganglia, intravillus nerves, and the deep muscle plexus. The 5-HT(2A) -/- colon did not express 5-HT(2A) receptors and did not contract in response to exogenous 5-HT. 5-HT(2A) -/- enterocytes were smaller, Paneth cells fewer, and muscle layers thinner (and showed degeneration) compared with those of 5-HT(2A) +/+ littermates. The 5-HT(2A) receptor may thus be required for the maintenance and/or development of enteric neuroeffectors and other enteric functions, although gastrointestinal and colonic transit times in 5-HT(2A) -/- and +/+ mice did not differ significantly.