Roles of Minor Pilin Subunits Spy0125 and Spy0130 in the Serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes Strain SF370

Adhesive pili on the surface of the serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes strain SF370 are composed of a major backbone subunit (Spy0128) and two minor subunits (Spy0125 and Spy0130), joined covalently by a pilin polymerase (Spy0129). Previous studies using recombinant proteins showed that both minor subunits bind to human pharyngeal (Detroit) cells (A. G. Manetti et al., Mol. Microbiol. 64:968-983, 2007), suggesting both may act as pilus-presented adhesins. While confirming these binding properties, studies described here indicate that Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role as a wall linker. Pili were localized predominantly to cell wall fractions of the wild-type S. pyogenes parent strain and a spy0125 deletion mutant. In contrast, they were found almost exclusively in culture supernatants in both spy0130 and srtA deletion mutants, indicating that the housekeeping sortase (SrtA) attaches pili to the cell wall by using Spy0130 as a linker protein. Adhesion assays with antisera specific for individual subunits showed that only anti-rSpy0125 serum inhibited adhesion of wild-type S. pyogenes to human keratinocytes and tonsil epithelium to a significant extent. Spy0125 was localized to the tip of pili, based on a combination of mutant analysis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of purified pili. Assays comparing parent and mutant strains confirmed its role as the adhesin. Unexpectedly, apparent spontaneous cleavage of a labile, proline-rich (8 of 14 residues) sequence separating the N-terminal ∼1/3 and C-terminal ∼2/3 of Spy0125 leads to loss of the N-terminal region, but analysis of internal spy0125 deletion mutants confirmed that this has no significant effect on adhesion.The group A Streptococcus (S. pyogenes) is an exclusively human pathogen that commonly colonizes either the pharynx or skin, where local spread can give rise to various inflammatory conditions such as pharyngitis, tonsillitis, sinusitis, or erysipelas. Although often mild and self-limiting, GAS infections are occasionally very severe and sometimes lead to life-threatening diseases, such as necrotizing fasciitis or streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. A wide variety of cell surface components and extracellular products have been shown or suggested to play important roles in S. pyogenes virulence, including cell surface pili (1, 6, 32). Pili expressed by the serotype M1 S. pyogenes strain SF370 mediate specific adhesion to intact human tonsil epithelia and to primary human keratinocytes, as well as cultured keratinocyte-derived HaCaT cells, but not to Hep-2 or A549 cells (1). They also contribute to adhesion to a human pharyngeal cell line (Detroit cells) and to biofilm formation (29).Over the past 5 years, pili have been discovered on an increasing number of important Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including Bacillus cereus (4), Bacillus anthracis (4, 5), Corynebacterium diphtheriae (13, 14, 19, 26, 27, 44, 46, 47), Streptococcus agalactiae (7, 23, 38), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (2, 3, 24, 25, 34), as well as S. pyogenes (1, 29, 32). All these species produce pili that are composed of a single major subunit plus either one or two minor subunits. During assembly, the individual subunits are covalently linked to each other via intermolecular isopeptide bonds, catalyzed by specialized membrane-associated transpeptidases that may be described as pilin polymerases (4, 7, 25, 41, 44, 46). These are related to the classical housekeeping sortase (usually, but not always, designated SrtA) that is responsible for anchoring many proteins to Gram-positive bacterial cell walls (30, 31, 33). The C-terminal ends of sortase target proteins include a cell wall sorting (CWS) motif consisting, in most cases, of Leu-Pro-X-Thr-Gly (LPXTG, where X can be any amino acid) (11, 40). Sortases cleave this substrate between the Thr and Gly residues and produce an intermolecular isopeptide bond linking the Thr to a free amino group provided by a specific target. In attaching proteins to the cell wall, the target amino group is provided by the lipid II peptidoglycan precursor (30, 36, 40). In joining pilus subunits, the target is the ɛ-amino group in the side chain of a specific Lys residue in the second subunit (14, 18, 19). Current models of pilus biogenesis envisage repeated transpeptidation reactions adding additional subunits to the base of the growing pilus, until the terminal subunit is eventually linked covalently via an intermolecular isopeptide bond to the cell wall (28, 41, 45).The major subunit (sometimes called the backbone or shaft subunit) extends along the length of the pilus and appears to play a structural role, while minor subunits have been detected either at the tip, the base, and/or at occasional intervals along the shaft, depending on the species (4, 23, 24, 32, 47). In S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae one of the minor subunits acts as an adhesin, while the second appears to act as a linker between the base of the assembled pilus and the cell wall (7, 15, 22, 34, 35). It was originally suggested that both minor subunits of C. diphtheriae pili could act as adhesins (27). However, recent data showed one of these has a wall linker role (26, 44) and may therefore not function as an adhesin.S. pyogenes strain SF370 pili are composed of a major (backbone) subunit, termed Spy0128, plus two minor subunits, called Spy0125 and Spy0130 (1, 32). All three are required for efficient adhesion to target cells (1). Studies employing purified recombinant proteins have shown that both of the minor subunits, but not the major subunit, bind to Detroit cells (29), suggesting both might act as pilus-presented adhesins. Here we report studies employing a combination of recombinant proteins, specific antisera, and allelic replacement mutants which show that only Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role in linking pili to the cell wall.     

Mucosal Adhesion Properties of the Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG SpaCBA and SpaFED Pilin Subunits

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG is a well-established Gram-positive probiotic strain, whose health-benefiting properties are dependent in part on prolonged residence in the gastrointestinal tract and are likely dictated by adherence to the intestinal mucosa. Previously, we identified two pilus gene clusters (spaCBA and spaFED) in the genome of this probiotic bacterium, each of which contained the predicted genes for three pilin subunits and a single sortase. We also confirmed the presence of SpaCBA pili on the cell surface and attributed an intestinal mucus-binding capacity to one of the pilin subunits (SpaC). Here, we report cloning of the remaining pilin genes (spaA, spaB, spaD, spaE, and spaF) in Escherichia coli, production and purification of the recombinant proteins, and assessment of the adherence of these proteins to human intestinal mucus. Our findings indicate that the SpaB and SpaF pilin subunits also exhibit substantial binding to mucus, which can be inhibited competitively in a dose-related manner. Moreover, the binding between the SpaB pilin subunit and the mucosal substrate appears to operate through electrostatic contacts and is not related to a recognized mucus-binding domain. We conclude from these results that it is conceivable that two pilin subunits (SpaB and SpaC) in the SpaCBA pilus fiber play a role in binding to intestinal mucus, but for the uncharacterized and putative SpaFED pilus fiber only a single pilin subunit (SpaF) is potentially responsible for adhesion to mucus.The human intestinal microbiota is comprised of more than 1,000 species of commensal and probiotic bacteria, including several members of the Gram-positive genus Lactobacillus (42, 52). Many strains of lactobacilli have a variety of health-promoting effects in humans and consequently have been used commercially as probiotics in foods and nutritional supplements (for a review, see reference 48). Often a necessary precondition for colonization of the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract by probiotic bacteria is preferential adherence to the intestinal mucosa, which in turn prolongs and stabilizes intestinal residence, possibly triggering a variety of defensive host cell immune responses and excluding pathogenic bacteria by competitive inhibition or steric hindrance (48). The outermost layer of the intestinal mucosa, which is a secreted and hydrated mucus gel that acts as a protective barrier and filter, consists primarily of a heterogeneous mixture of highly glycosylated membrane-associated and secreted glycoproteins called mucins (36). Although many studies have demonstrated that various probiotic Lactobacillus spp. adhere initially to the mucus gel layer, relatively few details about the overall molecular mechanism of mucosal adhesion are known (for a review, see reference 23). Nonetheless, several studies have reported that the adherence of Lactobacillus cells to the mucosal barrier is frequently due to a surface protein-mediated interaction. For example, Rojas et al. (44) determined that the ability of Lactobacillus fermentum 104R (reclassified as Lactobacillus reuteri 104R) to bind to porcine small intestinal mucus and gastric mucin was facilitated by a cell surface-localized mucus adhesion-promoting protein (MapA). Similarly, Macías-Rodríguez et al. (25) described two adhesion-associated proteins specific for porcine intestinal mucus-related substrates that are attached noncovalently to the cell surface of L. fermentum BCS87. Also, Roos and Jonsson (45) demonstrated adherence between the surface-associated Mub (mucus binding) protein from L. reuteri 1063 and intestinal mucus components derived from porcine and poultry sources. In addition, Pretzer et al. (38) identified a large multidomain surface protein in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 with binding specificity for the mannose moieties in mucins. Interestingly, Kinoshita et al. (19) discovered that glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), an enzyme normally associated with glycolysis, is localized on the surface of L. plantarum LA318 cells and adheres tightly to human colonic mucin.Until quite recently, only indirect or circumstantial evidence suggested that pilus-like structures extend from the surface of probiotic lactobacilli (28, 39). However, in a previous study (18) we demonstrated that Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, a well-studied and widely used probiotic strain (48), is a piliated microbe. Pili are slender, elongated, heteromeric, proteinaceous surface appendages that are present in numerous other Gram-positive bacteria and often mediate adherence between pathogenic and nonpathogenic species and their host cell targets (for reviews, see references 20, 26, 40, and 49) but have now emerged as possible facilitators of adhesion for probiotic colonization of the GI tract (18). Prototypically, the pilus fiber is composed of one major pilin that forms the pilus backbone and two minor pilin subunits (26, 40, 49), one subunit that has a role in signaling the cessation of pilus polymerization (27, 30) and is deposited at the pilus base and at irregular intervals along the pilus backbone and another subunit with an adhesive property that is often localized at the pilus tip (1, 41). The current model of pilus assembly in Corynebacterium diphtheriae (27) suggests that these pilin subunits are connected covalently to one another through isopeptidyl bonds by a membrane-bound transpeptidase (pilin-specific sortase) to produce polymerized pili, which are then attached covalently to the cell wall by a different transpeptidase (the housekeeping sortase) that is capable of recognizing all C-terminal LPXTG-like substrates. The genes encoding these pilus proteins, as well as the pilin-specific sortase, are clustered at the same locus in the genome (54).In a recent study (18), we discovered that in the L. rhamnosus GG genome the genes encoding two different pilus fibers are in the spaCBA and spaFED gene clusters and, based on a genomic comparison with another L. rhamnosus strain (LC705), that the spaCBA cluster is present in only L. rhamnosus GG. Moreover, in our previous work (18) the predicted genes for the major pilin subunit forming the pilus backbone (SpaA and SpaD), one ancillary minor pilin subunit (SpaB and SpaE) that (based on a model for pilus biogenesis) is likely located at the pilus base and decorates the pilus backbone (27), and another larger adherent minor pilin subunit (SpaC and SpaF) were identified in L. rhamnosus GG on the basis of amino acid identity with pilins from two enterococcal species. In addition, we also detected in the sequences of the predicted spaCBA and spaFED gene products the anticipated consensus motifs and domains characteristic of a pilin primary structure, including the Sec-dependent secretion signal, the sortase recognition site, the YPKN pilin-like motif, and the E box (18). Subsequently, expression and localization of intact SpaCBA pili on the cell surface of L. rhamnosus GG were confirmed by immunoblotting and immunogold-labeled electron microscopy using antiserum specific for the SpaC pilin (18). Adhesion interactions between the L. rhamnosus GG strain and intestinal mucosal surfaces have been reported and characterized in previous studies (15, 31, 33, 46, 55-57). However, in our recent study (18), SpaCBA pilus-mediated binding of L. rhamnosus GG cells to human intestinal mucus was revealed in adhesion experiments performed with both L. rhamnosus GG pretreated with SpaC antiserum and an L. rhamnosus GG spaC insertion mutant. More specifically, we demonstrated that there was significant binding between recombinant SpaC pilin protein and intestinal mucus and thus identified a mucus-binding capacity for one of the minor pilin components localized at the tip and along the backbone of the SpaCBA pilus (18). To expand on these findings, here we describe a study in which each of the remaining predicted pilin subunits (SpaA, SpaB, SpaD, SpaE, and SpaF) encoded by genes in the spaCBA and spaFED gene clusters was overproduced in a recombinant form, purified to apparent homogeneity, and characterized to determine its adherence to human intestinal mucus.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Structural Homology between the C-Terminal Domain of the PapC Usher and Its Plug

P pili are extracellular appendages responsible for the targeting of uropathogenic Escherichia coli to the kidney. They are assembled by the chaperone-usher (CU) pathway of pilus biogenesis involving two proteins, the periplasmic chaperone PapD and the outer membrane assembly platform, PapC. Many aspects of the structural biology of the Pap CU pathway have been elucidated, except for the C-terminal domain of the PapC usher, the structure of which is unknown. In this report, we identify a stable and folded fragment of the C-terminal region of the PapC usher and determine its structure using both X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. These structures reveal a β-sandwich fold very similar to that of the plug domain, a domain of PapC obstructing its translocation domain. This structural similarity suggests similar functions in usher-mediated pilus biogenesis, playing out at different stages of the process. This structure paves the way for further functional analysis targeting surfaces common to both the plug and the C-terminal domain of PapC.Adhesive surface organelles termed pili mediate the adhesion of bacteria to host cells. Pili assembled by the chaperone-usher (CU) pathway form one of five major classes of nonflagellar surface appendages in Gram-negative bacteria, with the P pilus system from uropathogenic Escherichia coli being one of the two best-characterized CU systems. These pili are multisubunit structures consisting of two distinct subassemblies, a rigid rod with a diameter of 6.8 nm and a distal flexible tip fibrillum with a diameter of 2 nm (18, 21). In P pili the helical rod is comprised of more than 1,000 copies of the PapA subunits arranged in a right-handed helical cylinder with 3.3 subunits per turn (3, 8, 14), and the tip fibrillum is comprised of 5 to 10 copies of the PapE subunits (21). Two “adaptor” subunits, PapK and PapF, connect the PapE tip fibrillum to the PapA rod and the PapE tip fibrillum to the distal PapG adhesin (16, 21). The proximal end of the pilus is terminated by the PapH subunit (2, 50). The PapG adhesin mediates the bacterial colonization of the kidney (25, 40) by binding to the globoseries of glycolipids present in the human kidney (25, 40) (Fig. ​(Fig.1A),1A), an event that is critical in pyelonephritis.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.(A) Schematic diagram of a P pilus assembled in the usher translocation platform. Subunits are represented by oval shapes, and N-terminal extensions are represented by short rectangular shapes. The usher homodimer is represented in the outer membrane (OM). In the usher protomer through which the nascent pilus passes, two positions of the plug are indicated by P where the plug is positioned to the side of the transmembrane barrel''s lumen and P′ where the plug has swung into the periplasmic space. (B) Domain organization of the PapC usher based on amino acid sequence. The C-terminal domain sequences are indicated in marine blue. The constructs used in this study are schematically represented underneath; all converge to a fragment containing residues 722 to 809, termed the “PapC CTD.” Ntd, N-terminal domain. (C) Identification of a discrete folding unit at the C terminus of PapC. Shown is an SDS-PAGE gel stained with Coomassie blue of the eluted PapC C-terminal fragments obtained with a construct comprising residues 641 to 809 after the first purification step. PS, prestained protein standards; Inj, loaded sample; FT, flowthrough.The assembly of pili is a coordinated process requiring two proteins: a chaperone and an outer membrane assembly platform, the usher. Pilus subunits are translocated into the periplasm via the general secretory machinery (38, 47). The binding of the PapD chaperone to the nascently translocated subunits facilitates their folding on the chaperone template. The chaperone remains bound to the folded subunits capping their interactive surfaces, thus preventing nonproductive interactions in the periplasm (7). Chaperone-subunit complexes are then targeted to the usher (PapC), where subunits polymerize in an ordered fashion and translocate across the outer membrane through the usher pore (47, 52). Subunit folding and stabilization occur when the chaperone and subunit form a complex through a mechanism termed donor strand complementation (DSC) (9, 41). In this mechanism the C-terminally truncated Ig-like fold of the pilus subunits, which contains only six of the seven β-strands that constitute the canonical Ig fold, is complemented by the donation of a β-strand from the chaperone (9, 41). Chaperone-subunit complexes are then targeted to the outer membrane usher, where the chaperone is released and subunits are noncovalently joined to preceding subunits in the nascent pilus fiber. This polymerization process is made possible by the presence of a disordered N-terminal extension sequence (NTES) in each subunit (except the adhesin) (41), which during pilus assembly displaces the strand donated by the chaperone, thereby substituting for the missing secondary structure in the previously assembled subunit. This mechanism is called donor-strand exchange (DSE) (9, 41, 42, 55). It is believed that this structural reorganization provides the driving force for pilus biogenesis, since no ATP hydrolysis or other type of external energy source is required (17, 56).DSE occurs at the outer membrane usher, which acts as a catalyst for polymerization (34). Biophysical and cryo-electron microscopy (EM) studies of the FimD usher (a close homolog of PapC) have shown that the usher is a twinned pore in both detergent and lipid bilayers (23, 46). Only one pore is used for secretion, but two pores are required for subunit recruitment (39). For PapC, both monomers and dimers have been described (15, 39). The usher has four functional domains (Fig. ​(Fig.1B):1B): a translocation domain forming a β-barrel with 24 transmembrane β-strands (15, 39), a plug domain in the middle of the translocation domain, and two periplasmic domains, one at each of the N- and C-terminal ends of the usher polypeptide (35, 48). The plug domain has a β-sandwich fold and completely occludes the pore in the inactive usher. Its function, besides gating the channel, seems to be further associated with pilus biogenesis since the deletion of the plug domain abolishes pilus formation in vitro and in vivo (15, 26, 54). The N-terminal domain selectively binds chaperone-subunit complexes (12, 33). The structure of the N-terminal domain of FimD bound to chaperone-subunit complexes indicated that the first 24 residues of FimD are involved in the recognition of chaperone-subunit complexes; the deletion of this region was shown previously to abolish pilus biogenesis (12, 32, 33).The role of the usher C-terminal domain (CTD) is not well understood. The binding of the chaperone-adhesin complex to the usher C terminus was previously demonstrated in vitro (46), while protease susceptibility in FimD shows that, following targeting to the usher N terminus, the chaperone-adhesin complex forms stable interactions with the FimD C terminus, inducing a conformational change in FimD that may be fundamental in the activation step of pilus biogenesis (29, 30, 43). The structure of the C-terminal domain is unknown and is the only part of the CU pilus biogenesis pathway not yet represented in structural terms. Here we provide evidence for the presence of a discrete folding unit in the PapC CTD and report its structure determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography.     

Levels of the Secreted Vibrio cholerae Attachment Factor GbpA Are Modulated by Quorum-Sensing-Induced Proteolysis

Vibrio cholerae is the etiologic agent of cholera in humans. Intestinal colonization occurs in a stepwise fashion, initiating with attachment to the small intestinal epithelium. This attachment is followed by expression of the toxin-coregulated pilus, microcolony formation, and cholera toxin (CT) production. We have recently characterized a secreted attachment factor, GlcNAc binding protein A (GbpA), which functions in attachment to environmental chitin sources as well as to intestinal substrates. Studies have been initiated to define the regulatory network involved in GbpA induction. At low cell density, GbpA was detected in the culture supernatant of all wild-type (WT) strains examined. In contrast, at high cell density, GbpA was undetectable in strains that produce HapR, the central regulator of the cell density-dependent quorum-sensing system of V. cholerae. HapR represses the expression of genes encoding regulators involved in V. cholerae virulence and activates the expression of genes encoding the secreted proteases HapA and PrtV. We show here that GbpA is degraded by HapA and PrtV in a time-dependent fashion. Consistent with this, ΔhapA ΔprtV strains attach to chitin beads more efficiently than either the WT or a ΔhapA ΔprtV ΔgbpA strain. These results suggest a model in which GbpA levels fluctuate in concert with the bacterial production of proteases in response to quorum-sensing signals. This could provide a mechanism for GbpA-mediated attachment to, and detachment from, surfaces in response to environmental cues.Vibrio cholerae has adapted to lifestyles in dual environments, allowing survival in aquatic locations, as well as the ability to colonize the epithelium of the human small intestine. This intestinal colonization by V. cholerae is a prerequisite for the disease cholera in humans. Intestinal colonization proceeds in a stepwise manner, initiating with attachment to the epithelial cell layer by multiple attachment factors (26). This stable attachment localizes the bacterium in an environment conducive for activation of subsequent virulence factors, including the toxin-coregulated pilus, a type IVb pilus that mediates cell-cell interactions and microcolony formation (27). Cholera toxin (CT) is produced and extracellularly secreted by bacteria within the microcolonies and enters into intestinal epithelial cells. CT causes the disruption of fluid and electrolyte balance and results in the voluminous rice water diarrhea characteristically observed with cholera patients.The ability of V. cholerae to bind to surfaces is crucial for the initial stages of colonization of both the aquatic and intestinal environments. Previous studies observing V. cholerae in the aquatic setting identified the ability of the bacteria to attach to zooplankton and phytoplankton, binding to surface structures that include chitin as a major component (7, 10, 11, 19, 21, 42). Chitin, a polymer consisting primarily of a β-1,4 linkage of GlcNAc monomers, is the most abundant aquatic carbon source and, when presented on the surfaces of zooplankton, aquatic exoskeletons, algae, and plants, provides a substrate for V. cholerae surface binding (8, 19-22). V. cholerae is able to break down chitin into carbon to use as a nutrient source via degradation by secreted chitinases (12). We have described a protein, GbpA (GlcNAc binding protein A), which facilitates the binding of V. cholerae to chitin, specifically to the chitin monomer GlcNAc, a sugar residue that is also found on the surface of epithelial cells (3, 16, 26). GbpA mediates binding to chitin, GlcNAc, and exoskeletons of Daphnia magna, as well as participates in effective intestinal colonization within the infant mouse model of cholera (26). GbpA is a secreted protein that exits the cell via the type 2 secretion system by which it mediates attachment by a yet uncharacterized mechanism (26). Previous studies examining the role of GbpA in binding to surfaces have been conducted utilizing various wild-type (WT) strains of V. cholerae, specifically O395 (26) and N16961 (33). These strains both are of the O1 serogroup but are differentially classified as classical (43) and El Tor biotypes (18), respectively. The classical biotype was responsible for the first six pandemics of cholera, whereas El Tor is the cause of the current pandemic (39).Quorum sensing regulates multiple bacterial processes, including virulence, formation of biofilms, and bioluminescence (25, 35, 36). In contrast to many other bacterial quorum-sensing systems, virulence gene expression and biofilm formation in V. cholerae is expressed under conditions of low cell density and repressed at high cell density (17, 35, 48). HapR, a member of the TetR family of regulatory proteins, is a central regulator on which the three parallel inputs of the V. cholerae quorum-sensing system converge (30, 35). During low-cell-density conditions, characteristic of growth within the aquatic environment or stages of early intestinal colonization, the quorum-sensing system is not engaged. Under conditions of high cell density, bacterial numbers and secreted autoinducer molecules are increased to a level that triggers the V. cholerae quorum-sensing system.HapR regulates gene function in two ways, serving as both an activator and repressor. At high cell density, HapR functions in the capacity of a repressor of the toxin-coregulated pilus and CT virulence cascade (29, 31) as well as a repressor of vps gene expression (17), preventing biofilm formation. In addition to repressing gene expression, at high cell density HapR activates the expression of genes encoding extracellularly secreted proteases HapA and PrtV (14, 17, 23, 45-47). HapA, also referred to as hemagglutinin/protease (HA/P), was first reported as a mucinase by Burnet (6) and later characterized as a zinc- and calcium-dependent metalloprotease (4). Extracellularly secreted via the V. cholerae type 2 secretion pathway (40), HA/P has been demonstrated to cleave fibronectin, lactoferrin, and mucin (15), as well as to participate in the activation of the CT A subunit (5). Further studies have led to the suggestion that HA/P is a detachase, critical for the release of V. cholerae from the surface of intestinal cells (2, 14, 38). PrtV is a second protease encoded by a gene that is activated by HapR (47). It has been demonstrated to be essential for both V. cholerae killing of Caenorhabditis elegans, as well as protecting V. cholerae from predator grazing by various flagellates (32, 45).The data presented here indicate that HapA and PrtV participate in the targeted degradation of the attachment factor GbpA. We demonstrate that GbpA is present during the logarithmic phase of growth and conditions of low cell density but that it is not present in the supernatant of high-cell-density cultures of strains that express functional HapR. Further studies revealed that during stages of high cell density, proteases HapA and PrtV, encoded by HapR-activated genes, are responsible for GbpA degradation in the culture supernatant. These findings suggest that the attachment factor GbpA is potentially a ligand targeted for protease degradation during the epithelial detachment process. This process could aid in the release of V. cholerae back into the aquatic environment following late stages of intestinal colonization.     

Natural Competence in Thermoanaerobacter and Thermoanaerobacterium Species

Low-G+C thermophilic obligate anaerobes in the class Clostridia are considered among the bacteria most resistant to genetic engineering due to the difficulty of introducing foreign DNA, thus limiting the ability to study and exploit their native hydrolytic and fermentative capabilities. Here, we report evidence of natural genetic competence in 13 Thermoanaerobacter and Thermoanaerobacterium strains previously believed to be difficult to transform or genetically recalcitrant. In Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum JW/SL-YS485, natural competence-mediated DNA incorporation occurs during the exponential growth phase with both replicating plasmid and homologous recombination-based integration, and circular or linear DNA. In T. saccharolyticum, disruptions of genes similar to comEA, comEC, and a type IV pilus (T4P) gene operon result in strains unable to incorporate further DNA, suggesting that natural competence occurs via a conserved Gram-positive mechanism. The relative ease of employing natural competence for gene transfer should foster genetic engineering in these industrially relevant organisms, and understanding the mechanisms underlying natural competence may be useful in increasing the applicability of genetic tools to difficult-to-transform organisms.The genera Thermoanaerobacter and Thermoanaerobacterium contain bacteria which are thermophilic, obligate anaerobes that specialize in polysaccharide and carbohydrate fermentation, producing primarily l-lactic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, CO₂, and H₂ (24, 27, 49). Taxonomically, they are distinguished from other anaerobic thermophilic clostridia by the ability to reduce thiosulfate to hydrogen sulfide or elemental sulfur (21). The majority of characterized Thermoanaerobacter and Thermoanaerobacterium strains have been isolated from hot springs and other thermal environments (20-22, 38, 47); however, they have also been isolated from canned foods (4, 10), soil (48), paper mills and breweries (41, 43), and deep subsurface environments (5, 13, 35), suggesting a somewhat ubiquitous environmental presence.Representatives of the Thermoanaerobacter and Thermoanaerobacterium genera have been considered for biotechnological applications, such as conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol (8, 27) or other fuels and chemicals (3, 24). However, the branched fermentation pathways of these organisms generally require modification for industrial application. Several studies have investigated manipulating bioprocess and growth conditions to alter end product ratios and yields, but this has not resulted in reliable conditions to maximize the yield of a single end product (18, 25). Genetic engineering is likely necessary for commercial application of Thermanaerobacter or Thermoanaerobacterium species (26, 27, 44). As genetic systems for these bacteria have emerged (28, 45), increased product yields have been demonstrated by gene knockout of l-lactate dehydrogenase (9, 14), phosphotransacetylase and acetate kinase (40), and hydrogenase (39). Despite this recent progress, genetic transformation is still considered the greatest barrier for engineering these organisms (44).In contrast, some of the bacteria most amenable to genetic manipulation are those exhibiting natural competence; for example, work with the naturally competent Streptococcus pneumoniae first established DNA as the molecule containing inheritable information (42). Naturally competent organisms are found in many bacterial phyla, although the overall number of bacteria known to be naturally competent is relatively small (16).The molecular mechanisms of natural competence are often divided into two stages: early-stage genes that encode regulatory and signal cascades to control competence induction, and late-stage genes that encode the machinery of DNA uptake and integration (16). The Gram-positive late-stage consensus mechanism for DNA uptake and assimilation, elucidated primarily through work with Bacillus subtilis, occurs through several molecular machinery steps. First, DNA is believed to interact with a type IV pilus (T4P) or pseudopilus that brings it into close proximity of the cell membrane. The precise mechanism of this phenomenon is unclear; although components of the T4P in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria have been shown to bind DNA (7, 19), in specific studies, a full pilus structure has been either not observed or shown not to be essential during natural competence (6, 36). Two proteins, ComEA and ComEC, are then involved in creation and transport of single-stranded DNA across the membrane, where it is subsequently bound by CinA-localized RecA and either integrated into the genome or replicated at an independent origin, as for plasmid DNA (6).Here, we report that several Thermoanaerobacter and Thermoanaerobacterium strains are naturally competent, characterize growth conditions conducive to natural competence, and identify genes in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum JW/SL-YS485 required for competence exhibition.     

Haloferax volcanii Flagella Are Required for Motility but Are Not Involved in PibD-Dependent Surface Adhesion

Although the genome of Haloferax volcanii contains genes (flgA1-flgA2) that encode flagellins and others that encode proteins involved in flagellar assembly, previous reports have concluded that H. volcanii is nonmotile. Contrary to these reports, we have now identified conditions under which H. volcanii is motile. Moreover, we have determined that an H. volcanii deletion mutant lacking flagellin genes is not motile. However, unlike flagella characterized in other prokaryotes, including other archaea, the H. volcanii flagella do not appear to play a significant role in surface adhesion. While flagella often play similar functional roles in bacteria and archaea, the processes involved in the biosynthesis of archaeal flagella do not resemble those involved in assembling bacterial flagella but, instead, are similar to those involved in producing bacterial type IV pili. Consistent with this observation, we have determined that, in addition to disrupting preflagellin processing, deleting pibD, which encodes the preflagellin peptidase, prevents the maturation of other H. volcanii type IV pilin-like proteins. Moreover, in addition to abolishing swimming motility, and unlike the flgA1-flgA2 deletion, deleting pibD eliminates the ability of H. volcanii to adhere to a glass surface, indicating that a nonflagellar type IV pilus-like structure plays a critical role in H. volcanii surface adhesion.To escape toxic conditions or to acquire new sources of nutrients, prokaryotes often depend on some form of motility. Swimming motility, a common means by which many bacteria move from one place to another, usually depends on flagellar rotation to propel cells through liquid medium (24, 26, 34). These motility structures are also critical for the effective attachment of bacteria to surfaces.As in bacteria, rotating flagella are responsible for swimming motility in archaea, and recent studies suggest that archaea, like bacteria, also require flagella for efficient surface attachment (37, 58). However, in contrast to bacterial flagellar subunits, which are translocated via a specialized type III secretion apparatus, archaeal flagellin secretion and flagellum assembly resemble the processes used to translocate and assemble the subunits of bacterial type IV pili (34, 38, 54).Type IV pili are typically composed of major pilins, the primary structural components of the pilus, and several minor pilin-like proteins that play important roles in pilus assembly or function (15, 17, 46). Pilin precursor proteins are transported across the cytoplasmic membrane via the Sec translocation pathway (7, 20). Most Sec substrates contain either a class I or a class II signal peptide that is cleaved at a recognition site that lies subsequent to the hydrophobic portion of the signal peptide (18, 43). However, the precursors of type IV pilins contain class III signal peptides, which are processed at recognition sites that precede the hydrophobic domain by a prepilin-specific peptidase (SPase III) (38, 43, 45). Similarly, archaeal flagellin precursors contain a class III signal peptide that is processed by a prepilin-specific peptidase homolog (FlaK/PibD) (3, 8, 10, 11). Moreover, flagellar assembly involves homologs of components involved in the biosynthesis of bacterial type IV pili, including FlaI, an ATPase homologous to PilB, and FlaJ, a multispanning membrane protein that may provide a platform for flagellar assembly, similar to the proposed role for PilC in pilus assembly (38, 44, 53, 54). These genes, as well as a number of others that encode proteins often required for either flagellar assembly or function (flaCDEFG and flaH), are frequently coregulated with the flg genes (11, 26, 44, 54).Interestingly, most sequenced archaeal genomes also contain diverse sets of genes that encode type IV pilin-like proteins with little or no homology to archaeal flagellins (3, 39, 52). While often coregulated with pilB and pilC homologs, these genes are never found in clusters containing the motility-specific flaCDEFG and flaH homologs; however, the proteins they encode do contain class III signal peptides (52). Several of these proteins have been shown to be processed by an SPase III (4, 52). Moreover, in Sulfolobus solfataricus and Methanococcus maripaludis, some of these archaeal type IV pilin-like proteins were confirmed to form surface filaments that are distinct from the flagella (21, 22, 56). These findings strongly suggest that the genes encode subunits of pilus-like surface structures that are involved in functions other than swimming motility.In bacteria, type IV pili are multifunctional filamentous protein complexes that, in addition to facilitating twitching motility, mediate adherence to abiotic surfaces and make close intercellular associations possible (15, 17, 46). For instance, mating between Escherichia coli in liquid medium has been shown to require type IV pili (often referred to as thin sex pili), which bring cells into close proximity (29, 30, 57). Recent work has shown that the S. solfataricus pilus, Ups, is required not only for efficient adhesion to surfaces of these crenarchaeal cells but also for UV-induced aggregation (21, 22, 58). Frols et al. postulate that autoaggregation is required for DNA exchange under these highly mutagenic conditions (22). Halobacterium salinarum has also been shown to form Ca²⁺-induced aggregates (27, 28). Furthermore, conjugation has been observed in H. volcanii, which likely requires that cells be held in close proximity for a sustained period to allow time for the cells to construct the cytoplasmic bridges that facilitate DNA transfer between them (35).To determine the roles played by haloarchaeal flagella and other putative type IV pilus-like structures in swimming and surface motility, surface adhesion, autoaggregation, and conjugation, we constructed and characterized two mutant strains of H. volcanii, one lacking the genes that encode the flagellins and the other lacking pibD. Our analyses indicate that although this archaeon was previously thought to be nonmotile (14, 36), wild-type (wt) H. volcanii can swim in a flagellum-dependent manner. Consistent with the involvement of PibD in processing flagellins, the peptidase mutant is nonmotile. Unlike nonhalophilic archaea, however, the flagellum mutant can adhere to glass as effectively as the wild type. Conversely, the ΔpibD strain fails to adhere to glass surfaces, strongly suggesting that in H. volcanii surface adhesion involves nonflagellar, type IV pilus-like structures.     

Population Structure of the Lyme Borreliosis Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi in the Western Black-Legged Tick (Ixodes pacificus) in Northern California

Factors potentially contributing to the lower incidence of Lyme borreliosis (LB) in the far-western than in the northeastern United States include tick host-seeking behavior resulting in fewer human tick encounters, lower densities of Borrelia burgdorferi-infected vector ticks in peridomestic environments, and genetic variation among B. burgdorferi spirochetes to which humans are exposed. We determined the population structure of B. burgdorferi in over 200 infected nymphs of the primary bridging vector to humans, Ixodes pacificus, collected in Mendocino County, CA. This was accomplished by sequence typing the spirochete lipoprotein ospC and the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer (IGS). Thirteen ospC alleles belonging to 12 genotypes were found in California, and the two most abundant, ospC genotypes H3 and E3, have not been detected in ticks in the Northeast. The most prevalent ospC and IGS biallelic profile in the population, found in about 22% of ticks, was a new B. burgdorferi strain defined by ospC genotype H3. Eight of the most common ospC genotypes in the northeastern United States, including genotypes I and K that are associated with disseminated human infections, were absent in Mendocino County nymphs. ospC H3 was associated with hardwood-dominated habitats where western gray squirrels, the reservoir host, are commonly infected with LB spirochetes. The differences in B. burgdorferi population structure in California ticks compared to the Northeast emphasize the need for a greater understanding of the genetic diversity of spirochetes infecting California LB patients.In the United States, Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most commonly reported vector-borne illness and is caused by infection with the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi (3, 9, 52). The signs and symptoms of LB can include a rash, erythema migrans, fever, fatigue, arthritis, carditis, and neurological manifestations (50, 51). The black-legged tick, Ixodes scapularis, and the western black-legged tick, Ixodes pacificus, are the primary vectors of B. burgdorferi to humans in the United States, with the former in the northeastern and north-central parts of the country and the latter in the Far West (9, 10). These ticks perpetuate enzootic transmission cycles together with a vertebrate reservoir host such as the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus, in the Northeast and Midwest (24, 35), or the western gray squirrel, Sciurus griseus, in California (31, 46).B. burgdorferi is a spirochete species with a largely clonal population structure (14, 16) comprising several different strains or lineages (8). The polymorphic ospC gene of B. burgdorferi encodes a surface lipoprotein that increases expression within the tick during blood feeding (47) and is required for initial infection of mammalian hosts (25, 55). To date, approximately 20 North American ospC genotypes have been described (40, 45, 49, 56). At least four, and possibly up to nine, of these genotypes are associated with B. burgdorferi invasiveness in humans (1, 15, 17, 49, 57). Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and, subsequently, sequence analysis of the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer (IGS) are used as molecular typing tools to investigate genotypic variation in B. burgdorferi (2, 36, 38, 44, 44, 57). The locus maintains a high level of variation between related species, and this variation reflects the heterogeneity found at the genomic level of the organism (37). The IGS and ospC loci appear to be linked (2, 8, 26, 45, 57), but the studies to date have not been representative of the full range of diversity of B. burgdorferi in North America.Previous studies in the northeastern and midwestern United States have utilized IGS and ospC genotyping to elucidate B. burgdorferi evolution, host strain specificity, vector-reservoir associations, and disease risk to humans. In California, only six ospC and five IGS genotypes have been described heretofore in samples from LB patients or I. pacificus ticks (40, 49, 56) compared to approximately 20 ospC and IGS genotypes identified in ticks, vertebrate hosts, or humans from the Northeast and Midwest (8, 40, 45, 49, 56). Here, we employ sequence analysis of both the ospC gene and IGS region to describe the population structure of B. burgdorferi in more than 200 infected I. pacificus nymphs from Mendocino County, CA, where the incidence of LB is among the highest in the state (11). Further, we compare the Mendocino County spirochete population to populations found in the Northeast.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Cytoskeletal Asymmetrical Dumbbell Structure of a Gliding Mycoplasma,Mycoplasma gallisepticum,Revealed by Negative-Staining Electron Microscopy

Several mycoplasma species feature a membrane protrusion at a cell pole, and unknown mechanisms provide gliding motility in the direction of the pole defined by the protrusion. Mycoplasma gallisepticum, an avian pathogen, is known to form a membrane protrusion composed of bleb and infrableb and to glide. Here, we analyzed the gliding motility of M. gallisepticum cells in detail. They glided in the direction of the bleb at an average speed of 0.4 μm/s and remained attached around the bleb to a glass surface, suggesting that the gliding mechanism is similar to that of a related species, Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Next, to elucidate the cytoskeletal structure of M. gallisepticum, we stripped the envelopes by treatment with Triton X-100 under various conditions and observed the remaining structure by negative-staining transmission electron microscopy. A unique cytoskeletal structure, about 300 nm long and 100 nm wide, was found in the bleb and infrableb. The structure, resembling an asymmetrical dumbbell, is composed of five major parts from the distal end: a cap, a small oval, a rod, a large oval, and a bowl. Sonication likely divided the asymmetrical dumbbell into a core and other structures. The cytoskeletal structures of M. gallisepticum were compared with those of M. pneumoniae in detail, and the possible protein components of these structures were considered.Mycoplasmas are commensal and occasionally pathogenic bacteria that lack a peptidoglycan layer (50). Several species feature a membrane protrusion at a pole; for Mycoplasma mobile, this protrusion is called the head, and for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, it is called the attachment organelle (25, 34-37, 52, 54, 58). These species bind to solid surfaces, such as glass and animal cell surfaces, and exhibit gliding motility in the direction of the protrusion (34-37). This motility is believed to be essential for the mycoplasmas'' pathogenicity (4, 22, 27, 36). Recently, the proteins directly involved in the gliding mechanisms of mycoplasmas were identified and were found to have no similarities to those of known motility systems, including bacterial flagellum, pilus, and slime motility systems (25, 34-37).Mycoplasma gallisepticum is an avian pathogen that causes serious damage to the production of eggs for human consumption (50). The cells are pear-shaped and have a membrane protrusion, consisting of the so-called bleb and infrableb (29), and gliding motility (8, 14, 22). Their putative cytoskeletal structures may maintain this characteristic morphology because M. gallisepticum, like other mycoplasma species, does not have a cell wall (50). In sectioning electron microscopy (EM) studies of M. gallisepticum, an intracellular electron-dense structure in the bleb and infrableb was observed, suggesting the existence of a cytoskeletal structure (7, 24, 29, 37, 58). Recently, the existence of such a structure has been confirmed by scanning EM of the structure remaining after Triton X-100 extraction (13), although the details are still unclear.A human pathogen, M. pneumoniae, has a rod-shaped cytoskeletal structure in the attachment organelle (9, 15, 16, 31, 37, 57). M. gallisepticum is related to M. pneumoniae (63, 64), as represented by 90.3% identity between the 16S rRNA sequences, and it has some open reading frames (ORFs) homologous to the component proteins of the cytoskeletal structures of M. pneumoniae (6, 17, 48). Therefore, the cytoskeletal structures of M. gallisepticum are expected to be similar to those of M. pneumoniae, as scanning EM images also suggest (13).The fastest-gliding species, M. mobile, is more distantly related to M. gallisepticum; it has novel cytoskeletal structures that have been analyzed through negative-staining transmission EM after extraction by Triton X-100 with image averaging (45). This method of transmission EM following Triton X-100 extraction clearly showed a cytoskeletal “jellyfish” structure. In this structure, a solid oval “bell,” about 235 nm wide and 155 nm long, is filled with a 12-nm hexagonal lattice. Connected to this bell structure are dozens of flexible “tentacles” that are covered with particles 20 nm in diameter at intervals of about 30 nm. The particles appear to have 180° rotational symmetry and a dimple at the center. The involvement of this cytoskeletal structure in the gliding mechanism was suggested by its cellular localization and by analyses of mutants lacking proteins essential for gliding.In the present study, we applied this method to M. gallisepticum and analyzed its unique cytoskeletal structure, and we then compared it with that of M. pneumoniae.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.