用干血纸片扩增人雄激素受体基因

雄激素不敏感综合征(AIS)为一类主要与雄激素受体(AR)基因缺陷密切相关的X-连锁隐性遗传病.为进一步阐明AIS的发病机制,建立了用干血纸片直接PCR扩增或将干血纸片中的血细胞洗脱裂解后进行PCR扩增雄激素受体(AR)基因的方法,结合已建立的SSCP分析及DNA直接测序等方法,可对AR基因进行突变分析.干血纸片取样及保存容易,便于邮寄,适用于外地,特别是边远地区患者的取样.该法不仅为AIS患者的AR基因突变分析和家系调查提供简便易行的方法,也适用于PCR基础上的其他各种基因的突变分析.     

Phenotypic heterogeneity associated with identical mutations in residue 870 of the androgen receptor

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) gene result in an X-linked recessive form of male pseudohermaphroditism known as the androgen-insensitivity syndrome (AIS). The alterations most frequently observed are missense or nonsense point mutations in exons 4-8 of the AR gene that affect the steroid-binding domain of the receptor in subjects with various degrees of androgen resistance. Despite the increasing number of AR mutations identified, a reliable genotype-phenotype correlation has not been established and individuals with the same molecular defect may exhibit different phenotypes. Here, we studied a patients with an AIS characterized by bilateral gynecomastia, normal male external genitalia, and normal sperm counts. METHODS: Exon-specific polymerase chain reaction, single-stranded conformational polymorphism, and sequencing analysis of the subject's AR gene were performed in addition to hormone-binding assays in skin fibroblasts from the patient. RESULTS: A point mutation at codon 870 of the AR, changing alanine to valine, was detected. CONCLUSION: As AR missense mutations changing alanine 870 to valine have been previously described in 3 unrelated patients showing severe AIS phenotypes, we conclude that phenotypic heterogeneity associated to identical mutations in the AR gene is probably due to individual functional differences in AR coregulator molecules.     

Novel and recurrent mutations in patients with androgen insensitivity syndromes

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) caused by mutations within the androgen receptor gene represents a variety of phenotypes from females with 46,XY karyotype over individuals with ambiguous genitalia to infertile males. METHODS: We studied 24 patients with AIS by sequencing androgen receptor gene. 19 of the investigated patients were affected by complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) and 5 suffered from partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS). RESULTS: So far we have detected 12 unreported mutations as well as 9 recurrent mutations (3 recurrent mutations were detected twice) in exons 2-8 of the androgen receptor gene. Three of the novel mutations cause a frameshift with subsequent premature termination and were found in patients with CAIS. These frameshifts were induced by single nucleotide deletion or insertion, or in one case by a 13-bp deletion, respectively. Another premature stop codon found in a CAIS patient results from an already reported nucleotide substitution in exon 5. Furthermore, in a CAIS patient we found a novel duplication of codon 788. All other mutations caused single base substitutions spread through exons 2-8 and were associated with CAIS or PAIS. CONCLUSIONS: We report a broad spectrum of different mutations within the AR gene leading to various manifestations of AIS. Apart from truncating mutations, a reliable genotype/phenotype correlation cannot be established. Therefore, modifying factors must be effective.     

Loss of Androgen Receptor-Dependent Growth Suppression by Prostate Cancer Cells Can Occur Independently from Acquiring Oncogenic Addiction to Androgen Receptor Signaling

The conversion of androgen receptor (AR) signaling as a mechanism of growth suppression of normal prostate epithelial cells to that of growth stimulation in prostate cancer cells is often associated with AR mutation, amplification and over-expression. Thus, down-regulation of AR signaling is commonly therapeutic for prostate cancer. The E006AA cell line was established from a hormone naïve, localized prostate cancer. E006AA cells are genetically aneuploid and grow equally well when xenografted into either intact or castrated male NOG but not nude mice. These cells exhibit: 1) X chromosome duplication and AR gene amplification, although paradoxically not coupled with increased AR expression, and 2) somatic, dominant-negative Serine-599-Glycine loss-of-function mutation within the dimerization surface of the DNA binding domain of the AR gene. No effect on the growth of E006AA cells is observed using targeted knockdown of endogenous mutant AR, ectopic expression of wild-type AR, or treatment with androgens or anti-androgens. E006AA cells represent a prototype for a newly identified subtype of prostate cancer cells that exhibit a dominant-negative AR loss-of-function in a hormonally naïve patient. Such loss-of-function eliminates AR-mediated growth suppression normally induced by normal physiological levels of androgens, thus producing a selective growth advantage for these malignant cells in hormonally naïve patients. These data highlight that loss of AR-mediated growth suppression is an independent process, and that, without additional changes, is insufficient for acquiring oncogene addiction to AR signaling. Thus, patients with prostate cancer cells harboring such AR loss-of-function mutations will not benefit from aggressive hormone or anti-AR therapies even though they express AR protein.     

Androgen axis in prostate cancer

Endocrine therapy for advanced prostate cancer is based on androgen ablation or blockade of the androgen receptor (AR). AR action in prostate cancer has been investigated in a number of cell lines, their derivatives, and transgenic animals. AR expression is heterogenous in prostate cancer in vivo; it could be detected in most primary tumors and their metastases. However, some cells lack the AR because of epigenetic changes in the gene promoter. AR expression increases after chronic androgen ablation in vitro. In several xenografts, AR upregulation is the most consistent change identified during progression towards therapy resistance. In contrast, the AR pathway may be by-passed during chronic treatment with a nonsteroidal anti-androgen. AR sensitivity in prostate cancer increases as a result of activation of the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. One of the major difficulties in endocrine therapy for prostate cancer is acquisition of agonistic properties of AR antagonists observed in the presence of mutated AR. Enhancement of AR function by associated coactivator proteins has been extensively investigated. Cofactors SRC-1, RAC3, p300/CBP, TIF-2, and Tip60 are upregulated in advanced prostate cancer. Most studies on ligand-independent activation of the AR are focused on Her-2/neu and interleukin-6 (IL-6). On the basis of studies that showed overexpression and activation of the AR in advanced prostate cancer, it was suggested that novel therapies that reduce AR expression will provide a benefit to patients. There is experimental evidence showing that prostate tumor growth in vitro and in vivo is inhibited following administration of chemopreventive drugs or antisense oligonucleotides that downregulate AR mRNA and protein expression.     

Differential gene-expression patterns in genital fibroblasts of normal males and 46,XY females with androgen insensitivity syndrome: evidence for early programming involving the androgen receptor

Background  

Androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) comprises a range of phenotypes from male infertility to complete feminization. Most individuals with AIS carry germline mutations of the androgen receptor (AR) that interfere with or ablate its function. As genital fibroblasts retain expression of the AR in vitro, we used genital skin fibroblasts from normal males and 46,XY females with complete AIS due to known AR mutations to gain insights into the role of the AR in human genital differentiation.     

Mild Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome: The Current Landscape

ObjectiveMild androgen insensitivity syndrome (MAIS) belongs to the androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) spectrum, an X-linked genetic disease that is the most common cause of differences in sex development. Unfortunately, AIS studies mainly focus on the partial and complete phenotypes, and the mild phenotype (MAIS) has been barely reported. Our purpose is to explore the MAIS facets, clinical features, and molecular aspects.MethodsWe collected all reported MAIS cases in the medical literature and presented them based on the phenotype and molecular diagnosis.ResultsWe identified 49 different androgen receptor (AR) mutations in 69 individuals in the literature. We compared the AR mutations presented in individuals with MAIS with AR mutations previously reported in other AIS phenotypes (partial and complete) regarding the type, location, genotype-phenotype correlation, and functional studies.ConclusionThis review provides a landscape of the mild phenotype of AIS. Most patients with MAIS present with male factor infertility. Therefore, AR gene sequencing should be considered during male factor infertility investigation, even in males with typically male external genitalia. In addition, MAIS can be part of other medical conditions, such as X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (Kennedy disease).     

Androgen receptor expression in primary prostate cancers of lobund-wistar rats and in tumor-derived cell lines

Summary Prostate tumors were induced in Lobund-Wistar rats by treatment with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) and testosterone propionate (TP). Androgen receptor (AR) expression was confirmed in 16 (100%) of the primary prostate cancers, with strong uniform staining in well-differentiated tumors and more variable AR immunoreactivity in poorly differentiated tumors. Epithelial cell lines were established from nine of the tumors. At early passages, four of the tumor cell lines tested were strongly immunoreactive for AR; however, only two of the cell lines, E2(A) and F2, have remained AR-positive. These cell lines specifically bind ³H-DHT at 40 and 19 fmol/mg protein, respectively, and express a 110 kDa AR immunoreactive protein. Proliferation in in vitro culture of both E2(A) and F2 cells was increased in the presence of 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT). The antiandrogen, hydroxyflutamide was able to prevent the DHT-induced growth of E2(A) but not F2 cells. Furthermore, hydroxyflutamide alone increased proliferation of F2 cells, suggesting that the androgen signalling pathway in this cell line may be abnormal. Tumorigenicity of the AR-expressing and nonexpressing cell lines was confirmed by xenograft formation following subcutaneous inoculation into intact male nude mice. In summary, carcinogen-induced prostate tumors of Lobund-Wistar rats express AR and two of nine cell lines derived from the tumors express AR. Further evaluation of AR structure in primary prostate tumors forming spontaneously or following MNU and TP induction will determine whether, as in human prostate cancers, disease progression in Lobund-Wistar rats is associated with mutations in the AR gene.     

The Androgen Hormone-Induced Increase in Androgen Receptor Protein Expression Is Caused by the Autoinduction of the Androgen Receptor Translational Activity

The androgen receptor (AR) plays a central role in prostate, muscle, bone and adipose tissue. Moreover, dysregulated AR activity is a driving force in prostate cancer (PCa) initiation and progression. Consequently, antagonizing AR signalling cascades via antiandrogenic therapy is a crucial treatment option in PCa management. Besides, very high androgen levels also inhibit PCa cells’ growth, so this effect could also be applied in PCa therapy. However, on the molecular and cellular level, these mechanisms have hardly been investigated so far. Therefore, the present study describes the effects of varying androgen concentrations on the viability of PCa cells as well as localization, transactivation, and protein stability of the AR. For this purpose, cell viability was determined via WST1 assay. Alterations in AR transactivity were detected by qPCR analysis of AR target genes. A fluorescent AR fusion protein was used to analyse AR localization microscopically. Changes in AR protein expression were detected by Western blot. Our results showed that high androgen concentrations reduce the cell viability in LNCaP and C4-2 cell lines. In addition, androgens have been reported to increase AR transactivity, AR localization, and AR protein expression levels. However, high androgen levels did not reduce these parameters. Furthermore, this study revealed an androgen-induced increase in AR protein synthesis. In conclusion, inhibitory effects on cell viability by high androgen levels are due to AR downstream signalling or non-genomic AR activity. Moreover, hormonal activation of the AR leads to a self-induced stabilization of the receptor, resulting in increased AR activity. Therefore, in clinical use, a therapeutic reduction in androgen levels represents a clinical target and would lead to a decrease in AR activity and, thus, AR-driven PCa progression.