Identification of a Novel WxSLVK Motif in the N Terminus of Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Vif That Is Critical for APOBEC3G and APOBEC3F Neutralization

The function of lentiviral Vif proteins is to neutralize the host antiviral cytidine deaminases APOBEC3G (A3G) and APOBEC3F (A3F). Vif bridges a cullin 5-based E3 ubiquitin ligase with A3G and A3F and mediates their degradation by proteasomes. Recent studies have found that Vif uses different domains to bind to A3G and A3F. A ¹⁴DRMR¹⁷ domain binds to A3F, ⁴⁰YRHHY⁴⁴ binds to A3G, and ⁶⁹YxxL⁷² binds to both A3G and A3F. Here, we report another functional domain of Vif. Previously, we demonstrated that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Vif failed to mediate A3G proteasomal degradation when all 16 lysines were mutated to arginines. Here, we show that K26, and to a lesser extent K22, is critical for A3G neutralization. K22 and K26 are part of a conserved ²¹WxSLVK²⁶ (x represents N, K, or H) motif that is found in most primate lentiviruses and that shows species-specific variation. Both K22 and K26 in this motif regulated Vif specificity only for A3G, whereas the SLV residues regulated Vif specificity for both A3F and A3G. Interestingly, SLV and K26 in HIV-1 Vif did not directly mediate Vif interaction with either A3G or A3F. Previously, other groups have reported an important role for W21 in A3F and A3G neutralization. Thus, ²¹WxSLVK²⁶ is a novel functional domain that regulates Vif activity toward both A3F and A3G and is a potential drug target to inhibit Vif activity and block HIV-1 replication.The replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is seriously impaired in human primary lymphocytes when the viral protein Vif is not present (8, 38). The first cellular target of Vif was identified as APOBEC3G (A3G) (34), which belongs to the cytidine deaminase family known as APOBEC (apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing catalytic polypeptide) (14). This family consists of APOBEC1; activation-induced deaminase (AID); APOBEC2; a subgroup of APOBEC3 (A3) proteins, including A3A, A3B, A3C, A3DE, A3F, A3G, and A3H; and APOBEC4 in humans (12). They have one or two copies of a cytidine deaminase domain with a signature motif (HxEx_23-28PCx_2-4C), and normally only one of the cytidine deaminase domains has deaminase activity.All seven A3 genes have been shown to inhibit the replication of various types of retroviruses via cytidine deamination-dependent or -independent mechanisms (3). In particular, A3B, A3DE, A3F, and A3G inhibit HIV-1 replication, whereas A3A and A3C do not (1, 6, 7, 19, 34, 42, 50). Recently, it was shown that optimizing A3H expression in cell culture also inhibits HIV-1 replication (4, 10, 25, 39). Among these proteins, A3G and A3F have the most potent anti-HIV-1 activities. A3G and A3F share ∼50% sequence similarity but have different biochemical properties (41) and different target sequence preferences while catalyzing cytidine deamination of viral cDNAs (19).Nevertheless, HIV-1 is able to elude this defense mechanism and cause human disease for two reasons. First, A3B and A3H are expressed only at low levels in vivo (4, 7, 18, 26). Second, HIV-1 produces Vif, which is expressed in all lentiviruses except equine infectious anemia virus. Vif can destabilize A3DE, A3F, and A3G proteins by targeting them to the proteasomal degradation pathway (6, 22, 35, 37, 50). In addition, Vif may also inhibit A3 activity independently of proteasomal degradation (15, 16, 31).The action of Vif is highly species specific. Vif from HIV-1 inactivates only A3G from humans, and Vif from simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) isolated from African green monkeys (AGM) does not inactivate A3G from humans. Nevertheless, Vif from SIV isolated from rhesus macaques (MAC) inactivates A3G from all humans, AGM, and MAC (21). A single residue in A3G at position 128, an aspartic acid in humans versus a lysine in AGM, determines A3G sensitivity to HIV-1 Vif (2, 32, 44). In addition, an N-terminal domain in HIV-1 Vif, ¹⁴DRMR¹⁷, determines Vif specificity for different A3G proteins (33).Vif targets A3G to the proteasome by acting as an adaptor protein that bridges A3G with a cullin 5 (Cul5)-based E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, which includes Cul5, elongin B (EloB), and EloC (46). Vif has a BC box motif (¹⁴⁴S¹⁴⁵L¹⁴⁶Q) that binds to EloC (23, 47) and an HCCH motif (¹¹⁴C/¹³³C) that binds to Cul5 (20, 24, 43). It has also been shown that Vif specifically binds to a region from amino acids 126 to 132 of A3G and to amino acids 283 to 300 of A3F (13, 30). It is believed that as a consequence of these interactions, A3G is polyubiquitylated and directed to 26S proteasomes for degradation.Several domains that determine Vif interactions with A3F and A3G have been identified. Analysis of HIV-1 patient-derived Vif sequences initially found that W11 is essential for A3F recognition and K22, Y40, and E45 are required for A3G recognition (36). The previously identified agmA3G-specific ¹⁴DRMR¹⁷ domain was also found to determine Vif specificity for A3F (33) by direct binding (29). An A3G-specific binding domain, ⁴⁰YRHHY⁴⁴, has also been identified (29), and a ⁶⁹YxxL⁷² domain interacts with both A3G and A3F (11, 28, 45).We have previously shown that Vif can mediate A3G proteasomal degradation in the absence of A3G polyubiquitylation and that, unexpectedly, this process is dependent on lysines in Vif (5). Here, we identify two N-terminal lysines that are important for Vif function. We show that these lysines are part of a ²¹WxSLVK²⁶ motif that is conserved in Vif from primate lentiviruses and that this motif regulates Vif activities against both A3G and A3F via different mechanisms.     

Ten Years of Global Evolution of the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus BA Genotype with a 60-Nucleotide Duplication in the G Protein Gene

The emergence of natural isolates of human respiratory syncytial virus group B (HRSV-B) with a 60-nucleotide (nt) duplication in the G protein gene in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1999 (A. Trento et al., J. Gen. Virol. 84:3115-3120, 2003) and their dissemination worldwide allowed us to use the duplicated segment as a natural tag to examine in detail the evolution of HRSV during propagation in its natural host. Viruses with the duplicated segment were all clustered in a new genotype, named BA (A. Trento et al., J. Virol. 80:975-984, 2006). To obtain information about the prevalence of these viruses in Spain, we tested for the presence of the duplicated segment in positive HRSV-B clinical samples collected at the Severo Ochoa Hospital (Madrid) during 12 consecutive epidemics (1996-1997 to 2007-2008). Viruses with the 60-nt duplication were found in 61 samples, with a high prevalence relative to the rest of B genotypes in the most recent seasons. Global phylogenetic and demographic analysis of all G sequences containing the duplication, collected across five continents up until April 2009, revealed that the prevalence of the BA genotype increased gradually until 2004-2005, despite its rapid dissemination worldwide. After that date and coinciding with a bottleneck effect on the population size, a relatively new BA lineage (BA-IV) replaced all other group B viruses, suggesting further adaptation of the BA genotype to its natural host.Human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV), a member of the Pneumovirus genus within the Paramyxoviridae family, is recognized as the leading agent responsible for severe respiratory infections in the pediatric population (31, 34, 35) and a pathogen of considerable importance in vulnerable adults (23, 24). The global respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease burden is estimated at 64 million cases and 160,000 deaths every year (70). This virus causes regular seasonal epidemics which take place during the winter months in temperate countries or during the rainy season in tropical areas (12). A peculiar aspect of HRSV is that the immune response produced by infection does not confer long-lasting protection, which is why reinfections are common throughout life (30).Neutralization tests performed with hyperimmune serum (16) and reactivity with specific monoclonal antibodies (4, 45) were used to classify HRSV isolates into two antigenic groups, A and B, which correlated with genetically distinct viruses (18). The main differences between these two groups are located in the major attachment G protein. This protein is a type II glycoprotein that shares neither sequence nor structural features with the attachment proteins (HN or H) of other paramyxoviruses (69), and it represents one of the targets of the immune response (27, 43). The full-length membrane-bound G protein (Gm) of 292 to 319 amino acids (depending on the viral strain) is also expressed in a secreted version (Gs) that lacks the transmembrane domain due to alternative initiation of translation at a second in-frame AUG codon in the G open reading frame (M48) (52). The G protein is the viral gene product with the highest degree of antigenic and genetic diversity among viral isolates (4, 18, 28, 45). Most changes are concentrated in two hypervariable regions that flank a highly conserved central region of the G protein ectodomain, which includes a cluster of four cysteines and the putative receptor binding site (43). It has been suggested that antigenic differences within this protein could facilitate repeated HRSV infections (37, 59). In addition, positive selection of amino acid changes was observed in the two hypervariable regions of the G protein ectodomain (7, 43, 71, 73, 74). One of the hypervariable regions, located in the C-terminal one-third of the G molecule, contains multiple epitopes recognized by monoclonal antibodies (43), suggesting that immune selection of new variants by antibodies may contribute to generation of HRSV diversity.Phylogenetic studies based on sequence analysis of the G protein have identified numerous genotypes in the antigenic groups A and B that show complex circulation patterns, since multiple genotypes of both antigenic groups may circulate within the same season and community, with one or two dominant genotypes being replaced in successive years (13, 14, 26, 27, 32, 49, 50). Each community shows a seasonal circulation pattern of genotypes, probably determined by local factors, such as the level of herd immunity to certain strains (3, 14, 49).The capacity of the G protein to accommodate drastic sequence changes was illustrated best by three antigenic group B viruses isolated in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1999 that contained a duplication of 60 nucleotides (nt) in the C-terminal third of the G protein gene (63). The global dissemination of these viruses allowed us to use the duplicated segment as a natural tag to reexamine the evolution of HRSV during propagation in its natural host. Phylogenetic analysis of G sequences revealed that all viruses with the duplicated segment clustered in a new genotype, named BA, and this finding supported the idea of a common ancestor for all viruses with the 60-nt duplication, dated about 1998 (64). The limited information about the molecular epidemiology of HRSV in Spain, together with an increase in G sequences with the duplicated segment reported worldwide, prompted us to conduct both a local search in Madrid for these viruses and a global phylogenetic analysis of HRSV with the 60-nt duplication from the time that these viruses were first detected, taking into account the geographic and temporal distribution of each isolate.     

The Glycosylated Gag Protein of a Murine Leukemia Virus Inhibits the Antiretroviral Function of APOBEC3

APOBEC proteins have evolved as innate defenses against retroviral infections. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) encodes the Vif protein to evade human APOBEC3G; however, mouse retroviruses do not encode a Vif homologue, and it has not been understood how they evade mouse APOBEC3. We report here a murine leukemia virus (MuLV) that utilizes its glycosylated Gag protein (gGag) to evade APOBEC3. gGag is critical for infection of in vitro cell lines in the presence of APOBEC3. Furthermore, a gGag-deficient virus restricted for replication in wild-type mice replicates efficiently in APOBEC3 knockout mice, implying a novel role of gGag in circumventing the action of APOBEC3 in vivo.APOBEC3G (hA3G) in humans and its mouse orthologue, APOBEC3 (mA3), act as potent innate defenses against retroviral infection. Both proteins deaminate cytidine in single-stranded DNA, ultimately resulting in hypermutation of newly synthesized proviral DNA (6, 16), although additional deaminase-independent mechanisms of inhibition have been identified (2). Infectious exogenous retroviruses, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and murine leukemia viruses (MuLVs), have evolved mechanisms to circumvent the action of the APOBEC proteins (3, 6). HIV encodes the Vif protein, which facilitates the rapid proteolysis of hA3G, while the mechanism by which exogenous MuLVs evade the action of mA3 is unknown (6).Exogenous MuLVs, as well as some other gammaretroviruses, encode a glycosylated Gag protein (gGag) originating from an alternate translation start site upstream of the methionine start site of the Gag structural polyproteins (10, 17, 27). gGag is synthesized at similar rates and levels as the structural Gag polyprotein in MuLV-infected cells but is glycosylated and undergoes distinct proteolytic processing (10, 12, 21). A carboxyl fragment of gGag is released from the cell, while an amino fragment is incorporated into the plasma membrane as a type 2 transmembrane protein (12, 25). The functions of gGag remain unclear, but mutations that eliminate its synthesis severely impede in vivo replication of the virus with little, if any, effect on replication in fibroblastic cell lines (7, 19, 26). APOBEC3 proteins are expressed in many tissues in vivo but are poorly expressed in many in vitro cell lines (6), suggesting a possible link between gGag expression and the evasion of mA3 by MuLVs. These studies were undertaken to determine if the expression of the gGag protein facilitated MuLV replication in the presence of mA3 in vitro and in vivo.     

The AKV Murine Leukemia Virus Is Restricted and Hypermutated by Mouse APOBEC3

APOBEC3 proteins are potent restriction factors against retroviral infection in primates. This restriction is accompanied by hypermutations in the retroviral genome that are attributable to the cytidine deaminase activity of the APOBEC3 proteins. Studies of nucleotide sequence diversity among endogenous gammaretroviruses suggest that the evolution of endogenous retroelements could have been shaped by the mutagenic cytidine deaminase activity of APOBEC3. In mice, however, APOBEC3 appears to restrict exogenous murine retroviruses in the absence of detectable levels of deamination. AKV is an endogenous retrovirus that is involved in causing a high incidence of thymic lymphoma in AKR mice. A comparative analysis of several mouse strains revealed a relatively low level of APOBEC3 expression in AKR mice. Here we show that endogenous mouse APOBEC3 restricts AKV infection and that this restriction likely reflects polymorphisms affecting APOBEC3 abundance rather than differences in the APOBEC3 isoforms expressed. We also observe that restriction of AKV by APOBEC3 is accompanied by G→A hypermutations in the viral genome. Our findings demonstrate that APOBEC3 acts as a restriction factor in rodents affecting the strain tropism of AKV, and they provide good support for the proposal that APOBEC3-mediated hypermutation contributed to the evolution of endogenous rodent retroviral genomes.Viruses that are restrained to infect only a specific animal species, subspecies, or strain have acquired particular features that enable them to circumvent the immune defenses of that particular host. Conversely, the natural hosts for these pathogens are alive today because they have evolved strategies to restrain the infectivities of their own pathogens. A virus with a broad host tropism will typically have evolved under selective pressure from several host factors that it will have encountered and successfully evaded. Ecotropic murine retroviruses generally have a restricted host range, due not only to the limited availability of their cellular receptor, mCAT-1 (58), but also to the various intrinsic restriction factors present in a specific host (7). Fv1 and Fv4 are the expression products of defective endogenous retroviruses that are present as germ line integrations and can interfere with and even block the infectivities of ecotropic retroviruses (6, 25).Mouse APOBEC3 is another type of host-encoded intrinsic restriction factor that can display deoxycytidine deaminase activity on single-stranded DNA (16, 54). APOBEC3 proteins have a potent inhibitory effect on retroelements ranging from primate lentiviruses to murine retrotransposons (reviewed in reference 17). In humans and primates there are seven APOBEC3 genes, most of which have been proposed to act as restriction elements for viruses and retroelements. The most extensively characterized of the primate APOBEC3 proteins are APOBEC3F and APOBEC3G, which constitute powerful restriction factors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) (reviewed in reference 17). The evidence that these lentiviruses are targets for APOBEC3 action does not come just from in vitro experiments: tissue samples from HIV type 1 (HIV-1)-infected humans contain retroviral sequences exhibiting a pattern of G→A hypermutation that is characteristic of APOBEC3F/G-dependent deoxycytidine deamination (4, 12, 26, 56, 57).In contrast to primates, mice have only a single APOBEC3 gene. This murine APOBEC3 has been shown to be able to inhibit retrotransposition of mouse MusD and intracisternal A particle elements in cotransfection assays (22, 23). However, the lack of any obvious signs of disease, developmental defect, or infertility in APOBEC3-deficient mice indicates that APOBEC3 may not play an essential role in suppressing the transposition of endogenous retroelements in laboratory mice (38, 40). With regard to exogenous retroviruses, mouse APOBEC3 has been shown to hinder the in vivo infectivity of the betaretrovirus mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) as well as that of the gammaretrovirus Friend murine leukemia virus (MLV) (40, 55); its activity against Moloney MLV (MoMLV), another gammaretrovirus, is apparently considerably weaker—likely reflecting the fact that MoMLV may have found ways to avoid APOBEC3-mediated restriction (14, 34, 46, 61). In none of these cases, however, does it appear that mouse APOBEC3 hypermutates the retroviral replication intermediates, suggesting that deamination is not central to its mechanism of restricting these retroviruses. Notwithstanding this failure to observe hypermutation of mouse retroviruses by mouse APOBEC3, recent studies of nucleotide sequence diversity among endogenous gammaretroviruses have suggested that the evolution of endogenous retroelements has been shaped by the mutagenic cytidine deaminase activity of APOBEC3 (28, 42). Thus, the picture which emerges is that APOBEC3 acts as one of several restriction factors of mouse retroelements, with some viruses having found ways to avoid APOBEC3-mediated restriction.Different mouse strains exhibit different patterns of APOBEC3 expression (41, 47, 55). Thus, two major mouse APOBEC3 alleles have been identified: one encodes a protein whose sequence is similar to that of the allele expressed in C57BL/6 mice, and the other resembles that of BALB/c mice (47, 55). Two major splicing isoforms of APOBEC3, which either do or do not include exon 5, have also been detected: the relative abundance of these two isoforms differs between strains (36, 41, 47, 55). The restriction of Friend MLV and that of MMTV both appear to be dependent on the identity of the mouse strain, and it has been proposed that this reflects the polymorphism in the sequence and splicing isoforms of APOBEC3 (41, 47, 55).In the course of our work on mouse APOBEC3, we discovered that APOBEC3 was expressed only at a low level in AKR mice. The AKR mouse strain harbors several germ line insertions of an endogenous ecotropic MLV designated AKV, which belongs to the gammaretrovirus family (5, 15, 27, 44, 45). A complex set of recombination events between AKV and nonecotropic endogenous retroviruses results in the production of leukemogenic mink cell focus-inducing viruses that are responsible for inducing a lethal form of thymic lymphoma of T-cell origin in these mice (19, 53). We were interested in determining whether the susceptibility of AKR mice to AKV infection could in part be explained by a failure of the APOBEC3 allele expressed in AKR mice to restrict this virus.Here we show that endogenous murine APOBEC3 in C57BL/6 mice not only acts to restrict AKV infection but also hypermutates AKV replication intermediates, likely providing a powerful block to natural transmission of the virus between mouse strains. We find that the different isoforms of APOBEC3 (whether or not they include exon 5) are effective in AKV restriction and that the differential resistance of lymphocytes from different mouse strains/mutants to AKV infection correlates with the abundance of endogenous APOBEC3 mRNA. Our results indicate that APOBEC3 confers effective protection against germ line integration of retroviral pathogens in rodents, and they provide tangible support to the proposal that DNA editing by APOBEC3 may have participated in the evolution of endogenous retroviral genomes.     

Isolation of Human Monoclonal Antibodies That Potently Neutralize Human Cytomegalovirus Infection by Targeting Different Epitopes on the gH/gL/UL128-131A Complex

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a widely circulating pathogen that causes severe disease in immunocompromised patients and infected fetuses. By immortalizing memory B cells from HCMV-immune donors, we isolated a panel of human monoclonal antibodies that neutralized at extremely low concentrations (90% inhibitory concentration [IC₉₀] values ranging from 5 to 200 pM) HCMV infection of endothelial, epithelial, and myeloid cells. With the single exception of an antibody that bound to a conserved epitope in the UL128 gene product, all other antibodies bound to conformational epitopes that required expression of two or more proteins of the gH/gL/UL128-131A complex. Antibodies against gB, gH, or gM/gN were also isolated and, albeit less potent, were able to neutralize infection of both endothelial-epithelial cells and fibroblasts. This study describes unusually potent neutralizing antibodies against HCMV that might be used for passive immunotherapy and identifies, through the use of such antibodies, novel antigenic targets in HCMV for the design of immunogens capable of eliciting previously unknown neutralizing antibody responses.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a member of the herpesvirus family which is widely distributed in the human population and can cause severe disease in immunocompromised patients and upon infection of the fetus. HCMV infection causes clinical disease in 75% of patients in the first year after transplantation (58), while primary maternal infection is a major cause of congenital birth defects including hearing loss and mental retardation (5, 33, 45). Because of the danger posed by this virus, development of an effective vaccine is considered of highest priority (51).HCMV infection requires initial interaction with the cell surface through binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (8) and possibly other surface receptors (12, 23, 64, 65). The virus displays a broad host cell range (24, 53), being able to infect several cell types such as endothelial cells, epithelial cells (including retinal cells), smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, leukocytes, and dendritic cells (21, 37, 44, 54). Endothelial cell tropism has been regarded as a potential virulence factor that might influence the clinical course of infection (16, 55), whereas infection of leukocytes has been considered a mechanism of viral spread (17, 43, 44). Extensive propagation of HCMV laboratory strains in fibroblasts results in deletions or mutations of genes in the UL131A-128 locus (1, 18, 21, 36, 62, 63), which are associated with the loss of the ability to infect endothelial cells, epithelial cells, and leukocytes (15, 43, 55, 61). Consistent with this notion, mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to UL128 or UL130 block infection of epithelial and endothelial cells but not of fibroblasts (63). Recently, it has been shown that UL128, UL130, and UL131A assemble with gH and gL to form a five-protein complex (thereafter designated gH/gL/UL128-131A) that is an alternative to the previously described gCIII complex made of gH, gL, and gO (22, 28, 48, 63).In immunocompetent individuals T-cell and antibody responses efficiently control HCMV infection and reduce pathological consequences of maternal-fetal transmission (13, 67), although this is usually not sufficient to eradicate the virus. Albeit with controversial results, HCMV immunoglobulins (Igs) have been administered to transplant patients in association with immunosuppressive treatments for prophylaxis of HCMV disease (56, 57), and a recent report suggests that they may be effective in controlling congenital infection and preventing disease in newborns (32). These products are plasma derivatives with relatively low potency in vitro (46) and have to be administered by intravenous infusion at very high doses in order to deliver sufficient amounts of neutralizing antibodies (4, 9, 32, 56, 57, 66).The whole spectrum of antigens targeted by HCMV-neutralizing antibodies remains poorly characterized. Using specific immunoabsorption to recombinant antigens and neutralization assays using fibroblasts as model target cells, it was estimated that 40 to 70% of the serum neutralizing activity is directed against gB (6). Other studies described human neutralizing antibodies specific for gB, gH, or gM/gN viral glycoproteins (6, 14, 26, 29, 34, 41, 52, 60). Remarkably, we have recently shown that human sera exhibit a more-than-100-fold-higher potency in neutralizing infection of endothelial cells than infection of fibroblasts (20). Similarly, CMV hyperimmunoglobulins have on average 48-fold-higher neutralizing activities against epithelial cell entry than against fibroblast entry (10). However, epitopes that are targeted by the antibodies that comprise epithelial or endothelial cell-specific neutralizing activity of human immune sera remain unknown.In this study we report the isolation of a large panel of human monoclonal antibodies with extraordinarily high potency in neutralizing HCMV infection of endothelial and epithelial cells and myeloid cells. With the exception of a single antibody that recognized a conserved epitope of UL128, all other antibodies recognized conformational epitopes that required expression of two or more proteins of the gH/gL/UL128-131A complex.     

Dissection of the HIV Vif Interaction with Human E3 Ubiquitin Ligase

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protein Vif recruits the host E3 ubiquitin ligase, composed of cullin 5 (Cul5), Rbx2, Elongin B, and Elongin C (EloBC), to polyubiquitinate the antiviral protein APOBEC3G. Multiple regions in the C-terminal half of Vif interact with the E3 ligase. We have purified individual regions of Vif and investigated their thermodynamic contributions to the ligase assembly in vitro using isothermal titration calorimetry and fluorescence anisotropy. Our results quantify the high-affinity interactions between the Vif BC box and EloBC and between the Vif zinc finger and Cul5, as well as the modest interaction between the Vif cullin box and Cul5. Our purified Vif constructs also provide direct biochemical evidence that the Vif cullin box, containing the PPLP region, leads to the dimerization of Vif-EloBC complexes but not Cul5-Vif-EloBC complexes.HIV Vif antagonizes the human antiviral protein APOBEC3G by hijacking the human Elongin B/C (EloBC)-cullin-SOCS box (ECS)-type E3 ubiquitin ligase, resulting in the polyubiquitination of APOBEC3G and subsequently its proteasomal degradation. Canonical ECS-type ubiquitin ligases consist of a cullin scaffold protein to which adaptor and substrate receptor proteins bind at the N terminus. HIV Vif serves as a substrate receptor protein—its N terminus recruits APOBEC3G, while multiple C-terminal regions assemble with the E3 ligase (9, 13, 24). The E3 ligase interacting regions include a zinc finger (residues 100 to 140), a BC box (residues 141 to 154), and a cullin box (residues 155 to 176) (Fig. ​(Fig.11).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.(A) A sequence schematic of Vif showing the regions that interact with A3G, A3F, EloBC, and Cul5. (B) An illustration of the assembly of the Vif-E3 ubiquitin ligase. (C) A homology model of Vif-Cul5-EloBC, where the Vif BC box-EloBC is actual structural data (PDB ID 3DCG).Vif binds the cullin adaptor proteins EloB and EloC through the BC-box region (24). The BC box is a loop-helix motif with the consensus sequence (T/S)LxxxCxxx(V/L/I) (7), and it also exists in cellular proteins that interact with EloBC. While Vif does not fit this consensus perfectly, it still binds EloBC with high affinity, and this interaction is lost upon mutation or deletion of consensus BC-box residues (10, 24, 25). This interaction has been described previously for the cellular proteins VHL (15), SOCS2 (3), SOCS3 (1), SOCS4 (4), and recently HIV Vif (14).Both the Vif zinc finger and cullin box interact with the E3 ligase scaffold protein cullin 5 (Cul5) (11, 12, 20, 21). It has been established that the zinc finger is required for Vif to bind Cul5. Mutation of critical histidine or cysteine residues in this region or the addition of the zinc chelator N,N,N′,N′-tetrakis(2-pyridylmethyl)-ethylenediamine (TPEN) abolishes the Vif-Cul5 interaction (8, 11, 25). The sequence of the Vif cullin box is not as conserved as those of cellular SOCS-box proteins, which have a defined structure and determine the specificities of their respective cullins (6). The role of the Vif cullin box is not clear, but it has been suggested to promote dimerization of Vif, involving the conserved PPLP region (22, 23), and has recently been implicated in APOBEC3G binding (5, 17). While its importance in Cul5 binding has been demonstrated in coimmunoprecipitation experiments (14), experimental data also exist showing that the Vif zinc finger alone still immunoprecipitates Cul5 (11, 21).To dissect the assembly of the Vif-E3 ubiquitin ligase, we quantified the binding interactions between various C-terminal Vif constructs, EloBC, and Cul5 by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and fluorescence polarization (FP). We additionally probed the effects of the cullin box on Vif dimerization.     

Antagonism to and Intracellular Sequestration of Human Tetherin by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Envelope Glycoprotein

Tetherin (CD317/BST-2), an interferon-induced membrane protein, restricts the release of nascent retroviral particles from infected cell surfaces. While human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) encodes the accessory gene vpu to overcome the action of tetherin, the lineage of primate lentiviruses that gave rise to HIV-2 does not. It has been previously reported that the HIV-2 envelope glycoprotein has a Vpu-like function in promoting virus release. Here we demonstrate that the HIV-2 Rod envelope glycoprotein (HIV-2 Rod Env) is a tetherin antagonist. Expression of HIV-2 Rod Env, but not that of HIV-1 or the closely related simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) SIVmac1A11, counteracts tetherin-mediated restriction of Vpu-defective HIV-1 in a cell-type-specific manner. This correlates with the ability of the HIV-2 Rod Env to mediate cell surface downregulation of tetherin. Antagonism requires an endocytic motif conserved across HIV/SIV lineages in the gp41 cytoplasmic tail, but specificity for tetherin is governed by extracellular determinants in the mature Env protein. Coimmunoprecipitation studies suggest an interaction between HIV-2 Rod Env and tetherin, but unlike studies with Vpu, we found no evidence of tetherin degradation. In the presence of HIV-2 Rod Env, tetherin localization is restricted to the trans-Golgi network, suggesting Env-mediated effects on tetherin trafficking sequester it from virus assembly sites on the plasma membrane. Finally, we recapitulated these observations in HIV-2-infected CD4⁺ T-cell lines, demonstrating that tetherin antagonism and sequestration occur at physiological levels of Env expression during virus replication.Various stages of the replication cycle of primate lentiviruses can be targeted by host antiviral restriction factors (reviewed in reference 49). In addition to the well-characterized antiviral effects of members of the APOBEC3 family of cytidine deaminases, particularly APOBEC3G and -3F, and species-specific variants of tripartite motif family 5α, the release of nascent retroviral particles has recently been shown to be a target for a novel restriction factor, tetherin (CD317/bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 [BST-2]) (31, 46). Tetherin is an interferon-inducible gene that was originally shown to impart a restriction on the release of mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that lack a vpu gene (31, 46). In tetherin-positive cells, mature Vpu-defective HIV-1 particles are retained on the cell surface, linked to the plasma membrane (PM) and each other via protease-sensitive tethers, and can be subsequently endocytosed and accumulate in late endosomes (30, 31). Tetherin is not HIV specific and restricts the release of virus-like particles derived from all retroviruses tested (18), as well as those of filoviruses and arenaviruses (18, 19, 39).Tetherin is a small (181-amino-acid) type II membrane protein with an unusual topology that exists mainly as a disulfide-linked dimer (34). It consists of an N-terminal cytoplasmic tail, a transmembrane anchor, an extracellular domain that includes three cysteine residues important for dimerization, a putative coiled-coil, and finally a glycophosphatidyinosityl-linked lipid anchor (22) that is essential for restriction (31). Tetherin localizes to retroviral assembly sites on the PM (18, 31), and this unusual structure is highly suggestive that tetherin restricts virion release by incorporation into the viral membrane and cross-linking virions to cells. Such a mechanism would make tetherin a powerful antiviral effector that can target an obligate part of most, if not all, enveloped virus assembly strategies. Moreover, since tetherin restriction has no specific requirement for virus protein sequences, to avoid its action, mammalian viruses have evolved to encode several distinct countermeasures that specifically inhibit tetherin''s antiviral function.The Vpu accessory protein antagonizes tetherin-mediated restriction of HIV-1 (31, 46). In the presence of Vpu, tetherin is downregulated from the cell surface (2, 46) and is targeted for degradation (10, 13, 14), although whether these processes are required for antagonism of tetherin function is unclear (27). HIV-1 Vpu displays a distinct species specificity in that it is unable to target tetherin orthologues from rhesus macaques or African green monkeys (14, 25). This differential sensitivity maps to the tetherin transmembrane domain, particularly residues that are predicted to have been under high positive selection pressure during primate evolution (14, 16, 25). This suggests that tetherin evolution may have been driven in part by viral countermeasures like Vpu. Vpu, however, is only encoded by HIV-1 and its direct simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) lineage precursors. The majority of SIVs, including the SIVsm, the progenitor of both HIV-2 and SIVmac, do not encode a Vpu protein (21). In some of these SIVs, tetherin antagonism was recently shown to map to the nef gene (16, 51). SIV Nef proteins, however, are generally ineffective against human tetherin because they target a (G/D)DIWK motif that was deleted from the human tetherin cytoplasmic tail sometime after the divergence of humans and chimpanzees (51). This raises the question of how HIV-2 is able to overcome human tetherin, as recent data show chronically HIV-2-infected CEM T cells have reduced tetherin levels on their surface (10).Interestingly, it has long been known that the envelope glycoprotein of certain HIV-2 isolates can stimulate the release of Vpu-defective HIV-1 virions from cells we now know to be tetherin positive (5, 6, 43). HIV and SIV Envs form trimeric spikes of dimers of the surface subunit (SU-gp105 in HIV-2/SIVmac and gp120 in HIV-1) that bind CD4 and the chemokine coreceptor and gp41 (the transmembrane [TM] subunit that facilitates fusion with and entry into the target cell). Envelope precursors (gp140 or gp160) are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum, where they become glycosylated and are exported to the surface via the secretory pathway (8). During transit through the Golgi apparatus and possibly in endosomal compartments, the immature precursors are cleaved by furin-like proteases to form mature spikes (15, 29). Multiple endocytosis motifs in the gp41 cytoplasmic tail lead to only minor quantities of Env being exposed at the cell surface at any given time (7, 40). Recent data demonstrated that the conserved GYxxθ motif, a binding site for the clathrin adaptor protein AP-2 (3), in the membrane-proximal region of HIV-2 gp41 is required to promote Vpu-defective HIV-1 release from HeLa cells (1, 32). Based on experiments with HIV-1/HIV-2 chimeric envelopes, an additional requirement in the extracellular component was suggested (1). In this study we set out to examine the Vpu-like activity of HIV-2 envelope in light of the discovery of tetherin. We demonstrate that the HIV-2 Env is a tetherin antagonist, and we provide mechanistic insight into the basis of this antagonism.     

Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Matrix Binding to Membranes and Nucleic Acids

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) matrix (MA) protein targets HIV-1 precursor Gag (PrGag) proteins to assembly sites at plasma membrane (PM) sites that are enriched in cholesterol and phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P₂]. MA is myristoylated, which enhances membrane binding, and specifically binds PI(4,5)P₂ through headgroup and 2′ acyl chain contacts. MA also binds nucleic acids, although the significance of this association with regard to the viral life cycle is unclear. We have devised a novel MA binding assay and used it to examine MA interactions with membranes and nucleic acids. Our results indicate that cholesterol increases the selectivity of MA for PI(4,5)P₂-containing membranes, that PI(4,5)P₂ binding tolerates 2′ acyl chain variation, and that the MA myristate enhances membrane binding efficiency but not selectivity. We also observed that soluble PI(4,5)P₂ analogues do not compete effectively with PI(4,5)P₂-containing liposomes for MA binding but surprisingly do increase nonspecific binding to liposomes. Finally, we have demonstrated that PI(4,5)P₂-containing liposomes successfully outcompete nucleic acids for MA binding, whereas other liposomes do not. These results support a model in which RNA binding protects MA from associating with inappropriate cellular membranes prior to PrGag delivery to PM assembly sites.The matrix (MA) domain of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) precursor Gag (PrGag) protein serves several functions in the viral replication cycle. One essential function is to target PrGag proteins to their assembly sites at the plasma membranes (PMs) of infected cells (4, 5, 11, 16, 25, 29, 30, 33, 35, 39, 43-45, 47, 50, 54, 56, 57). A second function is the recruitment of the viral surface/transmembrane (SU/TM; also referred to as gp120/gp41) envelope (Env) protein complex into virions (14, 15, 18, 19, 27, 51-53). In addition to these activities, numerous reports have attributed nucleic acid binding properties to retroviral MAs (24, 38, 47), and with some viruses MA appears to serve in an encapsidation capacity (24). While no encapsidation role has been assigned for HIV-1 MA, experiments have shown that MA can substitute for the HIV-1 nucleocapsid (NC) protein assembly function (38) under some circumstances, presumably by virtue of its facility to concentrate PrGag proteins by binding them to RNAs (38).A number of structural studies have been conducted on HIV-1 MA (1, 22, 41, 42, 49). The protein is N terminally myristoylated and composed of six α helices, capped by a three-strand β sheet (7, 22, 41, 42, 49). The protein trimerizes in solution and in crystals (22, 28, 49) and recently has been shown to organize as hexamers of trimers on lipid membranes (1). The membrane binding face of HIV-1 MA is basic, fostering its ability to associate with negatively charged phospholipid headgroups (1, 22, 30, 41, 42, 49). The importance of such an interaction has been underscored in molecular genetic experiments which demonstrated that depletion of PM phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P₂] reduced the assembly efficiency of HIV-1 (9, 36). Consistent with these observations, HIV-1 MA preferentially binds to soluble PI(4,5)P₂ mimics through contacts with the headgroup and 2′ acyl chain, and binding promotes exposure of the MA myristate group and protein oligomerization (17, 21, 40-43, 46). However, PI(4,5)P₂ is not the only lipid to demonstrate an association with HIV-1. In particular, HIV-1 appears to assemble at cholesterol-rich PM sites, cholesterol is highly enriched in HIV-1 virions, and cholesterol depletion reduces viral infectivity (2, 6, 8, 20, 23, 26, 31, 34, 37). The HIV-1 lipidome shows additional differences from the PM lipids of infected cells (2, 5, 8), suggesting that other lipids could affect PrGag-membrane binding or virus assembly site selection.To gain a better understanding of the functions and interactions of HIV-1 MA, we have examined the liposome and nucleic acid binding properties of purified myristoylated MA. Using liposome flotation assays and a novel liposome bead binding assay, we have demonstrated that the PI(4,5)P₂ binding specificity of MA is enhanced by cholesterol, that protein myristoylation increases membrane binding efficiency but not specificity, and that 2′ acyl chain variation is compatible with PI(4,5)P₂ binding. We also examined whether soluble PI(4,5)P₂ mimics could compete with liposomes for MA binding. Surprisingly, we found that soluble mimics not only failed to compete with PI(4,5)P₂ liposomes but also increased MA binding to membranes that do not contain acidic phospholipids. Finally, we have observed that while MA does bind nucleic acids, nucleic acid binding is outcompeted by PI(4,5)P₂-containing liposomes. Our results suggest models for PrGag-membrane and RNA association and the HIV-1 assembly pathway.     

Quantitative Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy Analysis of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag-Gag Interaction: Relative Contributions of the CA and NC Domains and Membrane Binding

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 structural polyprotein Pr55^Gag is necessary and sufficient for the assembly of virus-like particles on cellular membranes. Previous studies demonstrated the importance of the capsid C-terminal domain (CA-CTD), nucleocapsid (NC), and membrane association in Gag-Gag interactions, but the relationships between these factors remain unclear. In this study, we systematically altered the CA-CTD, NC, and the ability to bind membrane to determine the relative contributions of, and interplay between, these factors. To directly measure Gag-Gag interactions, we utilized chimeric Gag-fluorescent protein fusion constructs and a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) stoichiometry method. We found that the CA-CTD is essential for Gag-Gag interactions at the plasma membrane, as the disruption of the CA-CTD has severe impacts on FRET. Data from experiments in which wild-type (WT) and CA-CTD mutant Gag molecules are coexpressed support the idea that the CA-CTD dimerization interface consists of two reciprocal interactions. Mutations in NC have less-severe impacts on FRET between normally myristoylated Gag proteins than do CA-CTD mutations. Notably, when nonmyristoylated Gag interacts with WT Gag, NC is essential for FRET despite the presence of the CA-CTD. In contrast, constitutively enhanced membrane binding eliminates the need for NC to produce a WT level of FRET. These results from cell-based experiments suggest a model in which both membrane binding and NC-RNA interactions serve similar scaffolding functions so that one can functionally compensate for a defect in the other.The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) structural precursor polyprotein Pr55^Gag is necessary and sufficient for the assembly of virus-like particles (VLPs). Gag is composed of four major structural domains, matrix (MA), capsid (CA), nucleocapsid (NC), and p6, as well as two spacer peptides, SP1 and SP2 (3, 30, 94). Following particle assembly and release, cleavage by HIV-1 protease separates these domains. However, these domains must work together in the context of the full-length Gag polyprotein to drive particle assembly.Previous studies have mapped two major functional domains involved in the early steps of assembly: first, Gag associates with cellular membranes via basic residues and N-terminal myristoylation of the MA domain (10, 17, 20, 35, 39, 87, 91, 106); second, the Gag-Gag interaction domains that span the CA C-terminal domain (CA-CTD) and NC domain promote Gag multimerization (3, 11, 14, 16, 18, 23, 27, 29, 30, 33, 36, 46, 64, 88, 94, 102, 103). Structural and genetic studies have identified two residues (W184 and M185) within a dimerization interface in the CA-CTD that are critical to CA-CA interactions (33, 51, 74, 96). Analytical ultracentrifugation of heterodimers formed between wild-type (WT) Gag and Gag mutants with changes at these residues suggests that the dimerization interface consists of two reciprocal interactions, one of which can be disrupted to form a “half-interface” (22).In addition to the CA-CTD, NC contributes to assembly via 15 basic residues (8, 9, 11, 14, 18, 23, 25, 28, 34, 40, 43, 54, 57, 58, 74, 79, 88, 97, 104, 105), although some researchers have suggested that NC instead contributes to the stability of mature virions after assembly (75, 98, 99). It is thought that the contribution of NC to assembly is due to its ability to bind RNA, since the addition of RNA promotes the formation of particles in vitro (14-16, 37, 46), and RNase treatment disrupts Gag-Gag interactions (11) and immature viral cores (67). However, RNA is not necessary per se, since dimerization motifs can substitute for NC (1, 4, 19, 49, 105). This suggests a model in which RNA serves a structural role, such as a scaffold, to promote Gag-Gag interactions through NC. Based on in vitro studies, it has been suggested that this RNA scaffolding interaction facilitates the low-order Gag multimerization mediated by CA-CTD dimerization (4, 37, 49, 62, 63, 85). Despite a wealth of biochemical data, the relative contributions of the CA-CTD and NC to Gag multimerization leading to assembly are yet to be determined in cells.Mutations in Gag interaction domains alter membrane binding in addition to affecting Gag multimerization. In particular, mutations or truncations of CA reduce membrane binding (21, 74, 82), and others previously reported that mutations or truncations of NC affect membrane binding (13, 78, 89, 107). These findings are consistent with a myristoyl switch model of membrane binding in which Gag can switch between high- and low-membrane-affinity states (38, 71, 76, 83, 86, 87, 92, 95, 107). Many have proposed, and some have provided direct evidence (95), that Gag multimerization mediated by CA or NC interactions promotes the exposure of the myristoyl moiety to facilitate membrane associations.Gag membrane binding and multimerization appear to be interrelated steps of virus assembly, since membrane binding also facilitates Gag multimerization. Unlike betaretroviruses that fully assemble prior to membrane targeting and envelopment (type B/D), lentiviruses, such as HIV, assemble only on cellular membranes at normal Gag expression levels (type C), although non-membrane-bound Gag complexes exist (45, 58, 60, 61, 65). Consistent with this finding, mutations that reduce Gag membrane associations cause a defect in Gag multimerization (59, 74). Therefore, in addition to their primary effects on Gag-Gag interactions, mutations in Gag interaction domains cause a defect in membrane binding, which, in turn, causes a secondary multimerization defect. To determine the relative contributions of the CA-CTD and the NC domain to Gag-Gag interactions at the plasma membrane, it is essential to eliminate secondary effects due to a modulation of membrane binding.Except for studies using a His-tag-mediated membrane binding system (5, 46), biochemical studies of C-type Gag multimerization typically lack membranes. Therefore, these studies do not fully represent particle assembly, which occurs on biological membranes in cells. Furthermore, many biochemical and structural approaches are limited to isolated domains or truncated Gag constructs. Thus, some of these studies are perhaps more relevant to the behavior of protease-cleaved Gag in mature virions. With few exceptions (47, 74), cell-based studies of Gag multimerization have typically been limited to measuring how well mutant Gag is incorporated into VLPs when coexpressed or not with WT Gag. Since VLP production is a complex multistep process, effects of mutations on other steps in the process can confound this indirect measure. For example, NC contributes to VLP production by both promoting multimerization and interacting with the host factor ALIX to promote VLP release (26, 80). To directly assay Gag multimerization in cells, several groups (24, 45, 52, 56) developed microscopy assays based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). These assays measure the transfer of energy between donor and acceptor fluorescent molecules that are brought within ∼5 nm by the association of the proteins to which they are attached (41, 48, 90). However, these microscopy-based Gag FRET assays have not been used to fully elucidate several fundamental aspects of HIV-1 Gag multimerization at the plasma membrane of cells, such as the relative contributions of the CA-CTD and NC and the effect of membrane binding on Gag-Gag interactions. In this study, we used a FRET stoichiometry method based on calibrated spectral analysis of fluorescence microscopy images (41). This algorithm determines the fractions of both donor and acceptor fluorescent protein-tagged Gag molecules participating in FRET. For cells expressing Gag molecules tagged with donor (cyan fluorescent protein [CFP]) and acceptor (yellow fluorescent protein [YFP]) molecules, this method measures the apparent FRET efficiency, which is proportional to the mole fraction of Gag constructs in complex. By measuring apparent FRET efficiencies, quantitative estimates of the mole fractions of interacting proteins can be obtained.Using this FRET-based assay, we aim to answer two questions: (i) what are the relative contributions of CA-CTD and NC domains to Gag multimerization when secondary effects via membrane binding are held constant, and (ii) what is the effect of modulating membrane binding on the ability of Gag mutants to interact with WT Gag?Our data demonstrate that the CA-CTD dimerization interface is essential for Gag multimerization at the plasma membrane, as fully disrupting the CA-CTD interaction abolishes FRET, whereas a modest level of FRET is still detected in the absence of NC. We also present evidence that the CA-CTD dimerization interface consists of two reciprocal interactions, allowing the formation of a half-interface that can still contribute to Gag multimerization. Notably, when Gag derivatives with an intact CA-CTD were coexpressed with WT Gag, either membrane binding ability or NC was required for the Gag mutants to interact with WT Gag, suggesting functional compensation between these factors.