Heavily Isotype-Dependent Protective Activities of Human Antibodies against Vaccinia Virus Extracellular Virion Antigen B5

Antibodies against the extracellular virion (EV or EEV) form of vaccinia virus are an important component of protective immunity in animal models and likely contribute to the protection of immunized humans against poxviruses. Using fully human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), we now have shown that the protective attributes of the human anti-B5 antibody response to the smallpox vaccine (vaccinia virus) are heavily dependent on effector functions. By switching Fc domains of a single MAb, we have definitively shown that neutralization in vitro—and protection in vivo in a mouse model—by the human anti-B5 immunoglobulin G MAbs is isotype dependent, thereby demonstrating that efficient protection by these antibodies is not simply dependent on binding an appropriate vaccinia virion antigen with high affinity but in fact requires antibody effector function. The complement components C3 and C1q, but not C5, were required for neutralization. We also have demonstrated that human MAbs against B5 can potently direct complement-dependent cytotoxicity of vaccinia virus-infected cells. Each of these results was then extended to the polyclonal human antibody response to the smallpox vaccine. A model is proposed to explain the mechanism of EV neutralization. Altogether these findings enhance our understanding of the central protective activities of smallpox vaccine-elicited antibodies in immunized humans.The smallpox vaccine, live vaccinia virus (VACV), is frequently considered the gold standard of human vaccines and has been enormously effective in preventing smallpox disease. The smallpox vaccine led to the worldwide eradication of the disease via massive vaccination campaigns in the 1960s and 1970s, one of the greatest successes of modern medicine (30). However, despite the efficacy of the smallpox vaccine, the mechanisms of protection remain unclear. Understanding those mechanisms is key for developing immunologically sound vaccinology principles that can be applied to the design of future vaccines for other infectious diseases (3, 101).Clinical studies of fatal human cases of smallpox disease (variola virus infection) have shown that neutralizing antibody titers were either low or absent in patient serum (24, 68). In contrast, neutralizing antibody titers for the VACV intracellular mature virion (MV or IMV) were correlated with protection of vaccinees against smallpox (68). VACV immune globulin (VIG) (human polyclonal antibodies) is a promising treatment against smallpox (47), since it was able to reduce the number of smallpox cases ∼80% among variola-exposed individuals in four case-controlled clinical studies (43, 47, 52, 53, 69). In animal studies, neutralizing antibodies are crucial for protecting primates and mice against pathogenic poxviruses (3, 7, 17, 21, 27, 35, 61, 66, 85).The specificities and the functions of protective antipoxvirus antibodies have been areas of intensive research, and the mechanics of poxvirus neutralization have been debated for years. There are several interesting features and problems associated with the antibody response to variola virus and related poxviruses, including the large size of the viral particles and the various abundances of many distinct surface proteins (18, 75, 91, 93). Furthermore, poxviruses have two distinct virion forms, intracellular MV and extracellular enveloped virions (EV or EEV), each with a unique biology. Most importantly, MV and EV virions share no surface proteins (18, 93), and therefore, there is no single neutralizing antibody that can neutralize both virion forms. As such, an understanding of virion structure is required to develop knowledge regarding the targets of protective antibodies.Neutralizing antibodies confer protection mainly through the recognition of antigens on the surface of a virus. A number of groups have discovered neutralizing antibody targets of poxviruses in animals and humans (3). The relative roles of antibodies against MV and EV in protective immunity still remain somewhat unclear. There are compelling data that antibodies against MV (21, 35, 39, 66, 85, 90, 91) or EV (7, 16, 17, 36, 66, 91) are sufficient for protection, and a combination of antibodies against both targets is most protective (66). It remains controversial whether antibodies to one virion form are more important than those to the other (3, 61, 66). The most abundant viral particles are MV, which accumulate in infected cells and are released as cells die (75). Neutralization of MV is relatively well characterized (3, 8, 21, 35). EV, while less abundant, are critical for viral spread and virulence in vivo (93, 108). Neutralization of EV has remained more enigmatic (3).B5R (also known as B5 or WR187), one of five known EV-specific proteins, is highly conserved among different strains of VACV and in other orthopoxviruses (28, 49). B5 was identified as a protective antigen by Galmiche et al., and the available evidence indicated that the protection was mediated by anti-B5 antibodies (36). Since then, a series of studies have examined B5 as a potential recombinant vaccine antigen or as a target of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (1, 2, 7, 17, 40, 46, 66, 91, 110). It is known that humans immunized with the smallpox vaccine make antibodies against B5 (5, 22, 62, 82). It is also known that animals receiving the smallpox vaccine generate antibodies against B5 (7, 20, 27, 70). Furthermore, previous neutralization assays have indicated that antibodies generated against B5 are primarily responsible for neutralization of VACV EV (5, 83). Recently Chen at al. generated chimpanzee-human fusion MAbs against B5 and showed that the MAbs can protect mice from lethal challenge with virulent VACV (17). We recently reported, in connection with a study using murine monoclonal antibodies, that neutralization of EV is highly complement dependent and the ability of anti-B5 MAbs to protect in vivo correlated with their ability to neutralize EV in a complement-dependent manner (7).The focus of the study described here was to elucidate the mechanisms of EV neutralization, focusing on the human antibody response to B5. Our overall goal is to understand underlying immunobiological and virological parameters that determine the emergence of protective antiviral immune responses in humans.     

The UL31 and UL34 Gene Products of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Are Required for Optimal Localization of Viral Glycoproteins D and M to the Inner Nuclear Membranes of Infected Cells

U_L31 and U_L34 of herpes simplex virus type 1 form a complex necessary for nucleocapsid budding at the inner nuclear membrane (INM). Previous examination by immunogold electron microscopy and electron tomography showed that pU_L31, pU_L34, and glycoproteins D and M are recruited to perinuclear virions and densely staining regions of the INM where nucleocapsids bud into the perinuclear space. We now show by quantitative immunogold electron microscopy coupled with analysis of variance that gD-specific immunoreactivity is significantly reduced at both the INM and outer nuclear membrane (ONM) of cells infected with a U_L34 null virus. While the amount of gM associated with the nuclear membrane (NM) was only slightly (P = 0.027) reduced in cells infected with the U_L34 null virus, enrichment of gM in the INM at the expense of that in the ONM was greatly dependent on U_L34 (P < 0.0001). pU_L34 also interacted directly or indirectly with immature forms of gD (species expected to reside in the endoplasmic reticulum or nuclear membrane) in lysates of infected cells and with the cytosolic tail of gD fused to glutathione S-transferase in rabbit reticulocyte lysates, suggesting a role for the pU_L34/gD interaction in recruiting gD to the NM. The effects of U_L34 on gD and gM localization were not a consequence of decreased total expression of gD and gM, as determined by flow cytometry. Separately, pU_L31 was dispensable for targeting gD and gM to the two leaflets of the NM but was required for (i) the proper INM-versus-ONM ratio of gD and gM in infected cells and (ii) the presence of electron-dense regions in the INM, representing nucleocapsid budding sites. We conclude that in addition to their roles in nucleocapsid envelopment and lamina alteration, U_L31 and U_L34 play separate but related roles in recruiting appropriate components to nucleocapsid budding sites at the INM.Herpesvirus virions comprise a nucleocapsid containing genomic viral DNA, a proteinaceous tegument layer surrounding the nucleocapsid, and a virion envelope surrounding the tegument. The envelope of extracellular herpes simplex virus (HSV) virions contains glycoproteins gB, gC, gD, gE, gI, gG, gH, gK, gL, and gM (23, 51).As viewed by electron microscopy, nascent virions form as the nucleocapsid buds through densely staining regions of the nuclear membrane (NM) (21, 41). Electron tomograms of HSV perinuclear virions compared to those of extracellular virions infer that the former contain glycoproteins of considerably less glycosylation and a relatively sparse tegument layer compared to their counterparts in mature extracellular virions (6). The lower levels of glycosylation in HSV perinuclear virions are consistent with the fact that the lumen of the perinuclear space is continuous with that of the endoplasmic reticulum. Thus, the polysaccharide moieties of virion glycoproteins become fully processed as virions access Golgi enzymes during their egress to the extracellular space. Although the full proteome of the nascent perinuclear virion is unknown, immunogold studies have shown that they contain at least pU_L31, pU_L34, pUS3, gB, gC, gD, gH, gM, and the VP16 and pU_L11 tegument proteins in addition to the proteins that comprise the viral capsid (4, 5, 15, 25, 37, 40, 47, 50, 55).The U_L31 and U_L34 gene products of HSV-1 (pU_L31 and pU_L34, respectively) form a complex that localizes at the inner and outer NMs (INM and ONM, respectively) of infected cells (40). Both proteins are essential for nucleocapsid envelopment at the INM and become incorporated into nascent virions when nucleocapsids bud through the INM into the perinuclear space (39, 40, 42). The proteins and their essential role in nucleocapsid envelopment are conserved in all herpesvirus subfamilies (14, 20, 32, 45). pU_L31 of HSV-1 is a mostly hydrophobic phosphoprotein that is held in close approximation to the nucleoplasmic face of the INM by interaction with pU_L34, an integral membrane protein of type II orientation (33, 40, 46, 56). The first 248 amino acids of pU_L34 are predicted to reside in the nucleoplasm or cytoplasm, depending on whether the protein localizes in the INM or ONM, respectively. This is followed by an approximately 22-amino acid transmembrane domain with up to 5 amino acids residing in the perinuclear space or lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum.In the most prominent model of herpesvirion egress, the envelope of the perinuclear virion fuses with the ONM, releasing the deenveloped nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm, where it subsequently buds into cytoplasmic membranous organelles such as the Golgi or trans-Golgi network (34, 49). This model is supported by the observation that pU_L31 and pU_L34 are located in the perinuclear virion but not extracellular virions (18, 40). Thus, these proteins are lost from the virion upon fusion of the virion envelope with the ONM. Also supporting this egress model is the observation that deletion of both gB and gH causes virions to accumulate aberrantly in the perinuclear space (15). The involvement of gH and gB is potentially satisfying because these proteins comprise essential components of the machinery that mediates fusion of the virion envelope with the plasma or endosomal membranes during the initiation of infection (9, 12, 16, 44, 52). Moreover, expression of a combination of gB, gD, gH, and gL is sufficient to mediate fusion of cell membranes, whereas coexpression with gM or gK inhibits this fusion (3, 8, 11). Although the mechanism of fusion is unclear, gD is known to bind viral receptors on cell surfaces, and the structure of gB indicates features reminiscent of other viral fusion proteins (24, 35, 48). gD has been shown to interact with gB and gH at least transiently, suggesting that these interactions may be important for the fusion reaction (1, 2). Thus, fusion between the nascent and mature virion envelopes with target membranes may share mechanistic similarities.On the other hand, it is likely that the two fusion events are mechanistically distinct because (i) single deletion of either gH or gB precludes viral entry and cell/cell fusion but does not cause nascent virions to accumulate in the perinuclear space (9, 16, 31, 43) and (ii) the activity of a viral kinase encoded by U_S3 is dispensable for entry but believed to promote fusion of the perinuclear virion and ONM (28, 40). Moreover, the lack of glycoproteins from the pseudorabies virus perinuclear virion suggests that fusion is mediated by an entirely different mechanism in this system (26).The current study focuses on how glycoproteins are incorporated into the nascent virion. We show that optimal recruitment of gD to both leaflets of the NM and gM to the INM requires pU_L34 and pU_L31. We also show that immature gD interacts with pU_L34, suggesting a mechanism by which pU_L34 might recruit gD to the NM.     

The Amino Terminus of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein K (gK) Modulates gB-Mediated Virus-Induced Cell Fusion and Virion Egress

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)-induced cell fusion is mediated by viral glycoproteins and other membrane proteins expressed on infected cell surfaces. Certain mutations in the carboxyl terminus of HSV-1 glycoprotein B (gB) and in the amino terminus of gK cause extensive virus-induced cell fusion. Although gB is known to be a fusogenic glycoprotein, the mechanism by which gK is involved in virus-induced cell fusion remains elusive. To delineate the amino-terminal domains of gK involved in virus-induced cell fusion, the recombinant viruses gKΔ31-47, gKΔ31-68, and gKΔ31-117, expressing gK carrying in-frame deletions spanning the amino terminus of gK immediately after the gK signal sequence (amino acids [aa] 1 to 30), were constructed. Mutant viruses gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 exhibited a gK-null (ΔgK) phenotype characterized by the formation of very small viral plaques and up to a 2-log reduction in the production of infectious virus in comparison to that for the parental HSV-1(F) wild-type virus. The gKΔ31-68 mutant virus formed substantially larger plaques and produced 1-log-higher titers than the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 mutant virions at low multiplicities of infection. Deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB (gBΔ28syn) caused extensive virus-induced cell fusion. However, the gBΔ28syn mutation was unable to cause virus-induced cell fusion in the presence of the gKΔ31-68 mutation. Transient expression of a peptide composed of the amino-terminal 82 aa of gK (gKa) produced a glycosylated peptide that was efficiently expressed on cell surfaces only after infection with the HSV-1(F), gKΔ31-68, ΔgK, or UL20-null virus. The gKa peptide complemented the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-68 mutant viruses for infectious-virus production and for gKΔ31-68/gBΔ28syn-mediated cell fusion. These data show that the amino terminus of gK modulates gB-mediated virus-induced cell fusion and virion egress.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) specifies at least 11 virally encoded glycoproteins, as well as several nonglycosylated and lipid-anchored membrane-associated proteins, which serve important functions in virion infectivity and virus spread. Although cell-free enveloped virions can efficiently spread viral infection, virions can also spread by causing cell fusion of adjacent cellular membranes. Virus-induced cell fusion, which is caused by viral glycoproteins expressed on infected cell surfaces, enables transmission of virions from one cell to another, avoiding extracellular spaces and exposure of free virions to neutralizing antibodies (reviewed in reference 56). Most mutations that cause extensive virus-induced cell-to-cell fusion (syncytial or syn mutations) have been mapped to at least four regions of the viral genome: the UL20 gene (5, 42, 44); the UL24 gene (37, 58); the UL27 gene, encoding glycoprotein B (gB) (9, 51); and the UL53 gene, coding for gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57).Increasing evidence suggests that virus-induced cell fusion is mediated by the concerted action of glycoproteins gD, gB, and gH/gL. Recent studies have shown that gD interacts with both gB and gH/gL (1, 2). Binding of gD to its cognate receptors, including Nectin-1, HVEM, and others (12, 29, 48, 59, 60, 62, 63), is thought to trigger conformation changes in gH/gL and gB that cause fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes during virus entry and virus-induced cell fusion (32, 34). Transient coexpression of gB, gD, and gH/gL causes cell-to-cell fusion (49, 68). However, this phenomenon does not accurately model viral fusion, because other viral glycoproteins and membrane proteins known to be important for virus-induced cell fusion are not required (6, 14, 31). Specifically, gK and UL20 were shown to be absolutely required for virus-induced cell fusion (21, 46). Moreover, syncytial mutations within gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57) or UL20 (5, 42, 44) promote extensive virus-induced cell fusion, and viruses lacking gK enter more slowly than wild-type virus into susceptible cells (25). Furthermore, transient coexpression of gK carrying a syncytial mutation with gB, gD, and gH/gL did not enhance cell fusion, while coexpression of the wild-type gK with gB, gD, and gH/gL inhibited cell fusion (3).Glycoproteins gB and gH are highly conserved across all subfamilies of herpesviruses. gB forms a homotrimeric type I integral membrane protein, which is N glycosylated at multiple sites within the polypeptide. An unusual feature of gB is that syncytial mutations that enhance virus-induced cell fusion are located exclusively in the carboxyl terminus of gB, which is predicted to be located intracellularly (51). Single-amino-acid substitutions within two regions of the intracellular cytoplasmic domain of gB were shown to cause syncytium formation and were designated region I (amino acid [aa] positions 816 and 817) and region II (aa positions 853, 854, and 857) (9, 10, 28, 69). Furthermore, deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB, disrupting the small predicted alpha-helical domain H17b, causes extensive virus-induced cell fusion as well as extensive glycoprotein-mediated cell fusion in the gB, gD, and gH/gL transient-coexpression system (22, 49, 68). The X-ray structure of the ectodomain of gB has been determined and is predicted to assume at least two major conformations, one of which may be necessary for the fusogenic properties of gB. Therefore, perturbation of the carboxyl terminus of gB may alter the conformation of the amino terminus of gB, thus favoring one of the two predicted conformational structures that causes membrane fusion (34).The UL53 (gK) and UL20 genes encode multipass transmembrane proteins of 338 and 222 aa, respectively, which are conserved in all alphaherpesviruses (15, 42, 55). Both proteins have multiple sites where posttranslational modification can occur; however, only gK is posttranslationally modified by N-linked carbohydrate addition (15, 35, 55). The specific membrane topologies of both gK and UL20 protein (UL20p) have been predicted and experimentally confirmed using epitope tags inserted within predicted intracellular and extracellular domains (18, 21, 44). Syncytial mutations in gK map predominantly within extracellular domains of gK and particularly within the amino-terminal portion of gK (domain I) (18), while syncytial mutations of UL20 are located within the amino terminus of UL20p, shown to be located intracellularly (44). A series of recent studies have shown that HSV-1 gK and UL20 functionally and physically interact and that these interactions are necessary for their coordinate intracellular transport and cell surface expression (16, 18, 21, 26, 45). Specifically, direct protein-protein interactions between the amino terminus of HSV-1 UL20 and gK domain III, both of which are localized intracellularly, were recently demonstrated by two-way coimmunoprecipitation experiments (19).According to the most prevalent model for herpesvirus intracellular morphogenesis, capsids initially assemble within the nuclei and acquire a primary envelope by budding into the perinuclear spaces. Subsequently, these virions lose their envelope through fusion with the outer nuclear lamellae. Within the cytoplasm, tegument proteins associate with the viral nucleocapsid and final envelopment occurs by budding of cytoplasmic capsids into specific trans-Golgi network (TGN)-associated membranes (8, 30, 47, 70). Mature virions traffic to cell surfaces, presumably following the cellular secretory pathway (33, 47, 61). In addition to their significant roles in virus-induced cell fusion, gK and UL20 are required for cytoplasmic virion envelopment. Viruses with deletions in either the gK or the UL20 gene are unable to translocate from the cytoplasm to extracellular spaces and accumulated as unenveloped virions in the cytoplasm (5, 15, 20, 21, 26, 35, 36, 38, 44, 55). Current evidence suggests that the functions of gK and UL20 in cytoplasmic virion envelopment and virus-induced cell fusion are carried out by different, genetically separable domains of UL20p. Specifically, UL20 mutations within the amino and carboxyl termini of UL20p allowed cotransport of gK and UL20p to cell surfaces, virus-induced cell fusion, and TGN localization, while effectively inhibiting cytoplasmic virion envelopment (44, 45).In this paper, we demonstrate that the amino terminus of gK expressed as a free peptide of 82 aa (gKa) is transported to infected cell surfaces by viral proteins other than gK or UL20p and facilitates virus-induced cell fusion caused by syncytial mutations in the carboxyl terminus of gB. Thus, functional domains of gK can be genetically separated, as we have shown previously (44, 45), as well as physically separated into different peptide portions that retain functional activities of gK. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the amino terminus of gK directly or indirectly interacts with and modulates the fusogenic properties of gB.     

Proteolytic Activation of the Spike Protein at a Novel RRRR/S Motif Is Implicated in Furin-Dependent Entry,Syncytium Formation,and Infectivity of Coronavirus Infectious Bronchitis Virus in Cultured Cells

The spike (S) protein of the coronavirus (CoV) infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) is cleaved into S1 and S2 subunits at the furin consensus motif RRFRR₅₃₇/S in virus-infected cells. In this study, we observe that the S2 subunit of the IBV Beaudette strain is additionally cleaved at the second furin site (RRRR₆₉₀/S) in cells expressing S constructs and in virus-infected cells. Detailed time course experiments showed that a peptide furin inhibitor, decanoyl-Arg-Val-Lys-Arg-chloromethylketone, blocked both viral entry and syncytium formation. Site-directed mutagenesis studies revealed that the S1/S2 cleavage by furin was not necessary for, but could promote, syncytium formation by and infectivity of IBV in Vero cells. In contrast, the second site is involved in the furin dependence of viral entry and syncytium formation. Mutations of the second site from furin-cleavable RRRR/S to non-furin-cleavable PRRRS and AAARS, respectively, abrogated the furin dependence of IBV entry. Instead, a yet-to-be-identified serine protease(s) was involved, as revealed by protease inhibitor studies. Furthermore, sequence analysis of CoV S proteins by multiple alignments showed conservation of an XXXR/S motif, cleavable by either furin or other trypsin-like proteases, at a position equivalent to the second IBV furin site. Taken together, these results suggest that proteolysis at a novel XXXR/S motif in the S2 subunit might be a common mechanism for the entry of CoV into cells.The surface glycoproteins of numerous pathogenic enveloped viruses are proteolytically matured during infection in the host or cultured cell lines and are essential for the initiation of infection (33). In many cases, this processing is carried out by cellular proprotein convertases (PCs), most commonly furin (reviewed in reference 46). Furin is a calcium-dependent serine protease that circulates between the trans-Golgi network, plasma membrane, and early endosome by association with exocytic and endocytic pathways (9, 39). This membrane-bound enzyme undergoes further processing and is secreted from cells in an active soluble form (49). Furin processes a wide variety of precursor proteins after the C-terminal arginine (R) residue in the preferred consensus motif RXR(K)R/X (K is lysine, X is any amino acid, and the slash [/] indicates the cleavage position) for viral fusion proteins (2, 32, 33). So far, seven PCs have been identified in mammalian cells, and they display similar, but not identical, specificities for basic motifs at the cleavage site of a substrate. Accumulated studies indicate that secretory PCs, such as furin, PC5, and PC7, are major candidates for processing surface glycoproteins of pathogenic viruses, such as human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2, avian influenza virus H5N1, Ebola virus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (2, 27).Coronavirus (CoV) spike (S) protein, a class I viral fusion protein (7), is responsible for viral attachment to and entry into target cells and for cell-to-cell spread during infection. Typical class I fusion proteins usually require processing at a position immediately upstream of the fusion peptide in order to expose the membrane-anchored subunit. However, in infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) and murine hepatitis virus (MHV), processing of the S protein by furin occurs at a position more than 200 amino acids away from the predicted fusion peptides (6). Furthermore, there is a tradeoff between the furin cleavability of S protein and heparin sulfate (HS) binding in certain CoV strains adapted to cultured cell lines (15, 17). Consequently, CoV S proteins may be proteolytically activated by other proteases to initiate virus-cell fusion. Recently, proteolytic activation by an endosomal protease, cathepsin L, and a membrane-bound protease, factor Xa, was reported to play a role in the entry of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV (18, 45). Cathepsin is also implicated in the proteolytic activation of many CoV S proteins, including human CoV 229E, feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) 1146, feline enteric CoV (FECV) 1683, and MHV strain 2 (MHV-2), but not for MHV A59 and human CoV NL63 (31, 41, 43, 45).The association of cell surface sialic acid and a low-pH environment were reported to be required for IBV entry (14, 51, 52). However, the factors that determine the infectivity of IBV for cultured cells have yet to be identified. Clinical and field isolates of IBV can be propagated only in embryonated chicken eggs or, transiently, in primary chicken embryo kidney cells. In contrast, IBV of Beaudette strain origin can be readily adapted to cultured cells, such as Vero and BHK-21, by serial passages (1, 22, 40), and hence, it is often used as an in vitro infection model of IBV. Studies with a recombinant infectious clone system demonstrated that IBV S protein is indeed the determinant of extended cell tropism (12). IBV S protein is usually cleaved into S1 and S2 subunits at the furin consensus motif, RRFRR₅₃₇/S (the position includes the signal peptide) in virus-infected cells (13). Interestingly, Beaudette and related strains carry a mutation at position 687 of the S protein from proline (P) to R, creating a novel furin site (RRRR₆₉₀/S or RRKR₆₉₀/S). The acquisition of an additional furin site in the fusion protein may increase cell-to-cell spread by further activation of the protein (23) or extend the host range by utilization of cell surface HS as an entry receptor (17). In this study, furin-mediated cleavage of the IBV S protein at two furin sites was observed in IBV-infected cells. Mutational analysis of the two furin sites revealed that the second site is implicated in the furin dependence of IBV entry and syncytium formation. In contrast, cleavage at the S1/S2 site by furin was not necessary for, but could promote, syncytium formation and the infectivity of IBV in Vero cells.     

Species-Specific Regions of Occludin Required by Hepatitis C Virus for Cell Entry

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of liver disease worldwide. As HCV infects only human and chimpanzee cells, antiviral therapy and vaccine development have been hampered by the lack of a convenient small-animal model. In this study we further investigate how the species tropism of HCV is modulated at the level of cell entry. It has been previously determined that the tight junction protein occludin (OCLN) is essential for HCV host cell entry and that human OCLN is more efficient than the mouse ortholog at mediating HCV cell entry. To further investigate the relationship between OCLN sequence and HCV species tropism, we compared OCLN proteins from a range of species for their ability to mediate infection of naturally OCLN-deficient 786-O cells with lentiviral pseudoparticles bearing the HCV glycoproteins. While primate sequences function equivalently to human OCLN, canine, hamster, and rat OCLN had intermediate activities, and guinea pig OCLN was completely nonfunctional. Through analysis of chimeras between these OCLN proteins and alanine scanning mutagenesis of the extracellular domains of OCLN, we identified the second half of the second extracellular loop (EC2) and specific amino acids within this domain to be critical for modulating the HCV cell entry factor activity of this protein. Furthermore, this critical region of EC2 is flanked by two conserved cysteine residues that are essential for HCV cell entry, suggesting that a subdomain of EC2 may be defined by a disulfide bond.Hepatitis C virus (HCV), a member of the family Flaviviridae, is the causative agent of classically defined non-A, non-B hepatitis and is highly prevalent, with approximately 3% of the worldwide population infected (48). HCV infection often results in a chronic, life-long infection that can have severe health consequences, including hepatitis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver failure. There is no HCV vaccine available, and the currently employed interferon-based treatment is inadequate as it has severe side effects and is effective only in half of the major genotype-infected individuals (22, 32). Specific anti-HCV inhibitors targeting the viral proteases and polymerase are currently being developed and will likely improve therapeutic options substantially. Undoubtedly, however, the emergence of viral resistance to such inhibitors will be a problem facing future HCV treatment options. As such, developing a spectrum of inhibitors targeting diverse steps in the virus life cycle, including HCV cell entry, is a priority for HCV research. Such inhibitors may be particularly useful following liver transplantation. Although HCV is the leading cause of liver transplants worldwide (10), the usefulness of such procedures is limited by subsequent universal graft reinfection and often accelerated disease progression (21). Even transiently inhibiting graft reinfection with HCV cell entry inhibitors could greatly improve the effectiveness of this procedure. Therefore, a greater understanding of HCV cell entry is required for the development of therapies targeting this stage of the viral life cycle.HCV host cell entry is a complex process that culminates in the clathrin-dependent endocytosis of the virion and low-pH-mediated fusion of viral and cellular lipid membranes in an early endosome (9, 12, 26, 27, 36, 51). The entry process requires the two viral envelope glycoproteins, E1 and E2, and many cellular factors, including glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) (3, 27), lipoproteins, the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) (1, 38-40), tetraspanin CD81 (43), scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) (47), and two tight junction proteins, claudin-1 (CLDN1) (17) and occludin (OCLN) (31, 44). The polarized nature of hepatocytes and the tight junction roles of OCLN and CLDN1 suggest an entry pathway similar to that of the group B coxsackieviruses, where the virion initially binds readily accessible factors that then provide a mechanism for migration of the virion into the tight junction region, just prior to internalization (14). Indeed, cellular factors are utilized by the incoming HCV virion in a temporal manner. At least GAGs and LDL-R appear to mediate virion binding (1, 3, 27, 38-40). Conflicting evidence has shown that SR-BI acts as either a binding (11) or postbinding entry factor (53), while CD81 (7, 13, 17, 27) and CLDN1 (17, 29) play postbinding roles in the HCV cell entry process. Although the kinetics of OCLN usage have not been clearly defined, this protein does not appear to play a role in virion binding (6). However, recent data showing that CD81 and CLDN1 may form complexes prior to infection (15, 24, 25, 28, 29, 35, 52) and imaging of the cell entry process (12) may contradict such a model.Human hepatocytes are the major target for HCV infection. While multiple blocks at a number of viral life cycle stages likely exist in other cell types, cell entry is one of the events limiting HCV tropism (45). Although species differences in SR-BI and CLDN1 may exert some influence on this selectivity (11, 23), CD81 and OCLN appear to be largely responsible for the restriction of HCV entry to cells from human and chimpanzee origin (7, 8, 20, 44). In fact, overexpression of the human versions of CD81 and OCLN, along with either mouse or human SR-BI and CLDN1, renders a mouse cell able to support HCV cell entry (44).We sought to provide greater insight into the species-specific restrictions of HCV cell entry and to elucidate the mechanism by which OCLN acts to mediate HCV cell entry. We examined the ability of OCLN proteins from a range of species to mediate HCV cell entry and how this function correlated with the degree of similarity to the human protein. A six-amino-acid portion of the second extracellular loop (EC2) of human OCLN was found to be responsible for the species-specific differences in entry factor function. OCLN proteins that were less functional than the human protein could be rendered fully functional by adding the human residues at these positions. Conversely, the ability of the human OCLN protein to mediate HCV cell entry was impaired by swapping this region with the corresponding sequence from species with less functional OCLN proteins. Comprehensive alanine scanning of the extracellular loops of human OCLN confirmed that the second half of EC2 was most important for the HCV cell entry process. Two cysteine residues that flank this region were found to be essential for HCV cell entry, suggesting that these residues may define a disulfide-linked subdomain of EC2. None of these amino acid changes influenced OCLN expression or localization, implying that they may serve to modulate an interaction with either another host protein or the incoming HCV virion.     

The Single-Stranded DNA Genome of Novel Archaeal Virus Halorubrum Pleomorphic Virus 1 Is Enclosed in the Envelope Decorated with Glycoprotein Spikes

Only a few archaeal viruses have been subjected to detailed structural analyses. Major obstacles have been the extreme conditions such as high salinity or temperature needed for the propagation of these viruses. In addition, unusual morphotypes of many archaeal viruses have made it difficult to obtain further information on virion architectures. We used controlled virion dissociation to reveal the structural organization of Halorubrum pleomorphic virus 1 (HRPV-1) infecting an extremely halophilic archaeal host. The single-stranded DNA genome is enclosed in a pleomorphic membrane vesicle without detected nucleoproteins. VP4, the larger major structural protein of HRPV-1, forms glycosylated spikes on the virion surface and VP3, the smaller major structural protein, resides on the inner surface of the membrane vesicle. Together, these proteins organize the structure of the membrane vesicle. Quantitative lipid comparison of HRPV-1 and its host Halorubrum sp. revealed that HRPV-1 acquires lipids nonselectively from the host cell membrane, which is typical of pleomorphic enveloped viruses.In recent years there has been growing interest in viruses infecting hosts in the domain Archaea (43). Archaeal viruses were discovered 35 years ago (52), and today about 50 such viruses are known (43). They represent highly diverse virion morphotypes in contrast to the vast majority (96%) of head-tail virions among the over 5,000 described bacterial viruses (1). Although archaea are widespread in both moderate and extreme environments (13), viruses have been isolated only for halophiles and anaerobic methanogenes of the kingdom Euryarchaeota and hyperthermophiles of the kingdom Crenarchaeota (43).In addition to soil and marine environments, high viral abundance has also been detected in hypersaline habitats such as salterns (i.e., a multipond system where seawater is evaporated for the production of salt) (19, 37, 50). Archaea are dominant organisms at extreme salinities (36), and about 20 haloarchaeal viruses have been isolated to date (43). The majority of these are head-tail viruses, whereas electron microscopic (EM) studies of highly saline environments indicate that the two other described morphotypes, spindle-shaped and round particles, are the most abundant ones (19, 37, 43). Thus far, the morphological diversity of the isolated haloarchaeal viruses is restricted compared to viruses infecting hyperthermophilic archaea, which are classified into seven viral families (43).All of the previously described archaeal viruses have a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome (44). However, a newly characterized haloarchaeal virus, Halorubrum pleomorphic virus 1 (HRPV-1), has a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) genome (39). HRPV-1 and its host Halorubrum sp. were isolated from an Italian (Trapani, Sicily) solar saltern. Most of the studied haloarchaeal viruses lyse their host cells, but persistent infections are also typical (40, 44). HRPV-1 is a nonlytic virus that persists in the host cells. In liquid propagation, nonsynchronous infection cycles of HRPV-1 lead to continuous virus production until the growth of the host ceases, resulting in high virus titers in the growth medium (39).The pleomorphic virion of HRPV-1 represents a novel archaeal virus morphotype constituted of lipids and two major structural proteins VP3 (11 kDa) and VP4 (65 kDa). The genome of HRPV-1 is a circular ssDNA molecule (7,048 nucleotides [nt]) containing nine putative open reading frames (ORFs). Three of them are confirmed to encode structural proteins VP3, VP4, and VP8, which is a putative ATPase (39). The ORFs of the HRPV-1 genome show significant similarity, at the amino acid level, to the minimal replicon of plasmid pHK2 of Haloferax sp. (20, 39). Furthermore, an ∼4-kb region, encoding VP4- and VP8-like proteins, is found in the genomes of two haloarchaea, Haloarcula marismortui and Natronomonas pharaonis, and in the linear dsDNA genome (16 kb) of spindle-shaped haloarchaeal virus His2 (39). The possible relationship between ssDNA virus HRPV-1 and dsDNA virus His2 challenges the classification of viruses, which is based on the genome type among other criteria (15, 39).HRPV-1 is proposed to represent a new lineage of pleomorphic enveloped viruses (39). A putative representative of this lineage among bacterial viruses might be L172 of Acholeplasma laidlawii (14). The enveloped virion of L172 is pleomorphic, and the virus has a circular ssDNA genome (14 kb). In addition, the structural protein pattern of L172 with two major structural proteins, of 15 and 53 kDa, resembles that of HRPV-1.The structural approach has made it possible to reveal relationships between viruses where no sequence similarity can be detected. It has been realized that several icosahedral viruses infecting hosts in different domains of life share common virion architectures and folds of their major capsid proteins. These findings have consequences for the concept of the origin of viruses. A viral lineage hypothesis predicts that viruses within the same lineage may have a common ancestor that existed before the separation of the cellular domains of life (3, 5, 8, 26). Currently, limited information is available on the detailed structures of viruses infecting archaea. For example, the virion structures of nontailed icosahedral Sulfolobus turreted icosahedral virus (STIV) and SH1 have been determined (21, 23, 46). However, most archaeal viruses represent unusual, sometimes nonregular, morphotypes (43), which makes it difficult to apply structural methods that are based on averaging techniques.A biochemical approach, i.e., controlled virion dissociation, gives information on the localization and interaction of virion components. In the present study, controlled dissociation was used to address the virion architecture of HRPV-1. A comparative lipid analysis of HRPV-1 and its host was also carried out. Our results show that the unique virion type is composed of a flexible membrane decorated with the glycosylated spikes of VP4 and internal membrane protein VP3. The circular ssDNA genome resides inside the viral membrane vesicle without detected association to any nucleoproteins.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Murine Cytomegalovirus US22 Protein pM140 Protects Its Binding Partner,pM141, from Proteasome-Dependent but Ubiquitin-Independent Degradation

Stable assembly of murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) virions in differentiated macrophages is dependent upon the expression of US22 family gene M140. The M140 protein (pM140) exists in complex with products of neighboring US22 genes. Here we report that pM140 protects its binding partner, pM141, from ubiquitin-independent proteasomal degradation. Protection is conferred by a stabilization domain mapping to amino acids 306 to 380 within pM140, and this domain is functionally independent from the region that confers binding of pM140 to pM141. The M140 protein thus contains multiple domains that collectively confer a structure necessary to function in virion assembly in macrophages.Murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) US22 family genes M36, M139, M140, and M141 promote efficient replication of the virus in macrophages (1, 8, 12, 17). The M139, M140, and M141 genes are clustered within the MCMV genome and appear to function cooperatively (10, 12). During infection, the protein M140 (pM140) forms a stable complex with pM141, and one or more larger complexes are formed by the addition of M139 gene products (15). Although these complexes are evident in infected fibroblasts as well as macrophages, they are required for optimal MCMV replication selectively in macrophages (1, 17). In the absence of M140, virion assembly in macrophages is defective, likely due to the reduced levels of the major capsid protein and tegument protein M25 (11). pM140 also confers stability to its binding partner, pM141; in the absence of the M140 gene, the half-life of pM141 is reduced from 2 h to 1 h (12). Deletion of M141 compromises virus replication in macrophages (12), and pM141 directs pM140 to a perinuclear region of infected macrophages adjacent to an enlarged microtubule organizing center with characteristics of an aggresome (11, 15). Aggresomes are sites where proteins are targeted for degradation by either the proteasome or autophagy (3, 6, 19). We therefore hypothesized that complexing of pM141 to pM140 rescues pM141 from degradation by the proteasome and/or autophagy.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.