Role of Complex Carbohydrates in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection and Resistance to Antibody Neutralization

Complex N-glycans flank the receptor binding sites of the outer domain of HIV-1 gp120, ostensibly forming a protective “fence” against antibodies. Here, we investigated the effects of rebuilding this fence with smaller glycoforms by expressing HIV-1 pseudovirions from a primary isolate in a human cell line lacking N-acetylglucosamine transferase I (GnTI), the enzyme that initiates the conversion of oligomannose N-glycans into complex N-glycans. Thus, complex glycans, including those that surround the receptor binding sites, are replaced by fully trimmed oligomannose stumps. Conversely, the untrimmed oligomannoses of the silent domain of gp120 are likely to remain unchanged. For comparison, we produced a mutant virus lacking a complex N-glycan of the V3 loop (N301Q). Both variants exhibited increased sensitivities to V3 loop-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and soluble CD4. The N301Q virus was also sensitive to “nonneutralizing” MAbs targeting the primary and secondary receptor binding sites. Endoglycosidase H treatment resulted in the removal of outer domain glycans from the GnTI- but not the parent Env trimers, and this was associated with a rapid and complete loss in infectivity. Nevertheless, the glycan-depleted trimers could still bind to soluble receptor and coreceptor analogs, suggesting a block in post-receptor binding conformational changes necessary for fusion. Collectively, our data show that the antennae of complex N-glycans serve to protect the V3 loop and CD4 binding site, while N-glycan stems regulate native trimer conformation, such that their removal can lead to global changes in neutralization sensitivity and, in extreme cases, an inability to complete the conformational rearrangements necessary for infection.The intriguing results of a recent clinical trial suggest that an effective HIV-1 vaccine may be possible (97). Optimal efficacy may require a component that induces broadly neutralizing antibodies (BNAbs) that can block virus infection by their exclusive ability to recognize the trimeric envelope glycoprotein (Env) spikes on particle surfaces (43, 50, 87, 90). Env is therefore at the center of vaccine design programs aiming to elicit effective humoral immune responses.The amino acid sequence variability of Env presents a significant challenge for researchers seeking to elicit broadly effective NAbs. Early sequence comparisons revealed, however, that the surface gp120 subunit can be divided into discrete variable and conserved domains (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (110), the latter providing some hope for broadly effective NAb-based vaccines. Indeed, the constraints on variability in the conserved domains of gp120 responsible for binding the host cell receptor CD4, and coreceptor, generally CCR5, provide potential sites of vulnerability. However, viral defense strategies, such as the conformational masking of conserved epitopes (57), have made the task of eliciting bNAbs extremely difficult.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Glycan biosynthesis and distribution on gp120 and gp41. (A) Putative carbohydrate modifications are shown on gp120 and gp41 secondary structures, based on various published works (26, 42, 63, 74, 119, 128). The gp120 outer domain is indicated, as are residues that form the SOS gp120-gp41 disulfide bridge. The outer domain is divided into neutralizing and silent faces. Symbols distinguish complex, oligomannose, and unknown glycans. Generally, the complex glycans of the outer domain line the receptor binding sites of the neutralizing face, while the oligomannose glycans of the outer domain protect the silent domain (105). Asterisks denote sequons that are unlikely to be utilized, including position 139 (42), position 189 (26, 42), position 406 (42, 74), and position 637 (42). Glycans shown in gray indicate when sequon clustering may lead to some remaining unused, e.g., positions 156 and 160 (42, 119), positions 386, 392, and 397 (42), and positions 611 and 616 (42). There is also uncertainty regarding some glycan identities: glycans at positions 188, 355, 397, and 448 are not classified as predominantly complex or oligomannose (26, 42, 63, 128). The number of mannose moieties on oligomannose glycans can vary, as can the number of antennae and sialic acids on complex glycans (77). The glycan at position 301 appears to be predominantly a tetra-antennary complex glycan, as is the glycan at position 88, while most other complex glycans are biantennary (26, 128). (B) Schematic of essential steps of glycan biosynthesis from the Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursor to a mature multiantennary complex glycan. Mannosidase I progressively removes mannose moieties from the precursor, in a process that can be inhibited by the drug kifunensine. GnTI then transfers a GlcNAc moiety to the D1 arm of the resulting Man₅GlcNAc₂ intermediate, creating a hybrid glycan. Mannose trimming of the D2 and D3 arms then allows additional GlcNAc moieties to be added by a series of GnT family enzymes to form multiantennary complexes. This process can be inhibited by swainsonine. The antennae are ultimately capped and decorated by galactose and sialic acid. Hybrid and complex glycans are usually fucosylated at the basal GlcNAc, rendering them resistant to endo H digestion. However, NgF is able to remove all types of glycan.Carbohydrates provide a layer of protection against NAb attack (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). As glycans are considered self, antibody responses against them are thought to be regulated by tolerance mechanisms. Thus, a glycan network forms a nonimmunogenic “cloak,” protecting the underlying protein from antibodies (3, 13, 20, 29, 39, 54, 65, 67, 74, 85, 96, 98, 117, 119, 120). The extent of this protection can be illustrated by considering the ways in which glycans differ from typical amino acid side chains. First, N-linked glycans are much larger, with an average mass more than 20 times that of a typical amino acid R-group. They are also usually more flexible and may therefore affect a greater volume of surrounding space. In the more densely populated parts of gp120, the carbohydrate field may even be stabilized by sugar-sugar hydrogen bonds, providing even greater coverage (18, 75, 125).The process of N-linked glycosylation can result in diverse structures that may be divided into three categories: oligomannose, hybrid, and complex (56). Each category shares a common Man₃GlcNAc₂ pentasaccharide stem (where Man is mannose and GlcNAc is N-acetylglucosamine), to which up to six mannose residues are attached in oligomannose N-glycans, while complex N-glycans are usually larger and may bear various sizes and numbers of antennae (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). Glycan synthesis begins in the endoplasmic reticulum, where N-linked oligomannose precursors (Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂; Glc is glucose) are transferred cotranslationally to the free amide of the asparagine in a sequon Asn-X-Thr/Ser, where X is not Pro (40). Terminal glucose and mannose moieties are then trimmed to yield Man₅GlcNAc₂ (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). Conversion to a hybrid glycan is then initiated by N-acetylglucosamine transferase I (GnTI), which transfers a GlcNAc moiety to the D1 arm of the Man₅GlcNAc₂ substrate (19) (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). This hybrid glycoform is then a substrate for modification into complex glycans, in which the D2 and D3 arm mannose residues are replaced by complex antennae (19, 40, 56). Further enzymatic action catalyzes the addition of α-1-6-linked fucose moiety to the lower GlcNAc of complex glycan stems, but usually not to oligomannose glycan stems (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (21, 113).Most glycoproteins exhibit only fully mature complex glycans. However, the steric limitations imposed by the high density of glycans on some parts of gp120 lead to incomplete trimming, leaving “immature” oligomannose glycans (22, 26, 128). Spatial competition between neighboring sequons can sometimes lead to one or the other remaining unutilized, further distancing the final Env product from what might be expected based on its primary sequence (42, 48, 74, 119). An attempt to assign JR-FL gp120 and gp41 sequon use and types, based on various studies, is shown in Fig. ​Fig.1A1A (6, 26, 34, 35, 42, 63, 71, 74, 119, 128). At some positions, the glycan type is conserved. For example, the glycan at residue N301 has consistently been found to be complex (26, 63, 128). At other positions, considerable heterogeneity exists in the glycan populations, in some cases to the point where it is difficult to unequivocally assign them as predominantly complex or oligomannose. The reasons for these uncertainties might include incomplete trimming (42), interstrain sequence variability, the form of Env (e.g., gp120 or gp140), and the producer cell. The glycans of native Env trimers and monomeric gp120 may differ due to the constraints imposed by oligomerization (32, 41, 77). Thus, although all the potential sequons of HXB2 gp120 were found to be occupied in one study (63), some are unutilized or variably utilized on functional trimers, presumably due to steric limitations (42, 48, 75, 96, 119).The distribution of complex and oligomannose glycans on gp120 largely conforms with an antigenic map derived from structural models (59, 60, 102, 120), in which the outer domain is divided into a neutralizing face and an immunologically silent face. Oligomannose glycans cluster tightly on the silent face of gp120 (18, 128), while complex glycans flank the gp120 receptor binding sites of the neutralizing face, ostensibly forming a protective “fence” against NAbs (105). The relatively sparse clustering of complex glycans that form this fence may reflect a trade-off between protecting the underlying functional domains from NAbs by virtue of large antennae while at the same time permitting sufficient flexibility for the refolding events associated with receptor binding and fusion (29, 39, 67, 75, 98, 117). Conversely, the dense clustering of oligomannose glycans on the silent domain may be important for ensuring immune protection and/or in creating binding sites for lectins such as DC-SIGN (9, 44).The few available broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) define sites of vulnerability on Env trimers (reviewed in reference 52). They appear to fall into two general categories: those that access conserved sites by overcoming Env''s various evasion strategies and, intriguingly, those that exploit these very defensive mechanisms. Regarding the first category, MAb b12 recognizes an epitope that overlaps the CD4 binding site of gp120 (14), and MAbs 2F5 and 4E10 (84, 129) recognize adjacent epitopes of the membrane-proximal external region (MPER) at the C-terminal ectodomain of gp41. The variable neutralizing potencies of these MAbs against primary isolates that contain their core epitopes illustrate how conformational masking can dramatically regulate their exposure (11, 118). Conformational masking also limits the activities of MAbs directed to the V3 loop and MAbs whose epitopes overlap the coreceptor binding site (11, 62, 121).A second category of MAbs includes MAb 2G12, which recognizes a tight cluster of glycans in the silent domain of gp120 (16, 101, 103, 112). This epitope has recently sparked considerable interest in exploiting glycan clusters as possible carbohydrate-based vaccines (2, 15, 31, 70, 102, 116). Two recently described MAbs, PG9 and PG16 (L. M. Walker and D. R. Burton, unpublished data), also target epitopes regulated by the presence of glycans that involve conserved elements of the second and third variable loops and depend largely on the quaternary trimer structure and its in situ presentation on membranes. Their impressive breadth and potency may come from the fact that they target the very mechanisms (variable loops and glycans) that are generally thought to protect the virus from neutralization. Like 2G12, these epitopes are likely to be constitutively exposed and thus may not be subject to conformational masking (11, 118).The above findings reveal the importance of N-glycans both as a means of protection against neutralization as well as in directly contributing to unique neutralizing epitopes. Clearly, further studies on the nature and function of glycans in native Env trimers are warranted. Possible approaches may be divided into four categories, namely, (i) targeted mutation, (ii) enzymatic removal, (iii) expression in the presence of glycosylation inhibitors, and (iv) expression in mutant cell lines with engineered blocks in the glycosylation pathway. Much of the available information on the functional roles of glycans in HIV-1 and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection has come from the study of mutants that eliminate glycans either singly or in combination (20, 54, 66, 71, 74, 91, 95, 96). Most mutants of this type remain at least partially functional (74, 95, 96). In some cases these mutants have little effect on neutralization sensitivity, while in others they can lead to increased sensitivity to MAbs specific for the V3 loop and CD4 binding site (CD4bs) (54, 71, 72, 74, 106). In exceptional cases, increased sensitivity to MAbs targeting the coreceptor binding site and/or the gp41 MPER has been observed (54, 66, 72, 74).Of the remaining approaches for studying the roles of glycans, enzymatic removal is constrained by the extreme resistance of native Env trimers to many common glycosidases, contrasting with the relative sensitivity of soluble gp120 (67, 76, 101). Alternatively, drugs can be used to inhibit various stages of mammalian glycan biosynthesis. Notable examples are imino sugars, such as N-butyldeoxynojirimycin (NB-DNJ), that inhibit the early trimming of the glucose moieties from Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursors in the endoplasmic reticulum (28, 38, 51). Viruses produced in the presence of these drugs may fail to undergo proper gp160 processing or fusion (37, 51). Other classes of inhibitor include kifunensine and swainsonine, which, respectively, inhibit the trimming of the Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursor into Man₅GlcNAc₂ or inhibit the removal of remaining D2 and D3 arm mannoses from the hybrid glycans, thus preventing the construction of complex glycan antennae (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (17, 33, 76, 104, 119). Unlike NB-DNJ, viruses produced in the presence of these drugs remain infectious (36, 76, 79, 100).Yet another approach is to express virus in insect cells that can only modify proteins with paucimannose N-glycans (58). However, the inefficient gp120/gp41 processing by furin-like proteases in these cells prevents their utility in functional studies (123). Another option is provided by ricin-selected GnTI-deficient cell lines that cannot transfer GlcNAc onto the mannosidase-trimmed Man₅GlcNAc₂ substrate, preventing the formation of hybrid and complex carbohydrates (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (17, 32, 36, 94). This arrests glycan processing at a well-defined point, leading to the substitution of complex glycans with Man₅GlcNAc₂ rather than with the larger Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursors typically obtained with kifunensine treatment (17, 32, 33, 104). With this in mind, here we produced HIV-1 pseudoviruses in GnTI-deficient cells to investigate the role of complex glycan antennae in viral resistance neutralization. By replacing complex glycans with smaller Man₅GlcNAc₂ we can determine the effect of “lowering the glycan fence” that surrounds the receptor binding sites, compared to the above-mentioned studies of individual glycan deletion mutants, whose effects are analogous to removing a fence post. Furthermore, since oligomannose glycans are sensitive to certain enzymes, such as endoglycosidase H (endo H), we investigated the effect of dismantling the glycan fence on Env function and stability. Our results suggest that the antennae of complex glycans protect against certain specificities but that glycan stems regulate trimer conformation with often more dramatic consequences for neutralization sensitivity and in extreme cases, infectious function.     

The DR1 and DR6 First Exons of Human Herpesvirus 6A Are Not Required for Virus Replication in Culture and Are Deleted in Virus Stocks That Replicate Well in T-Cell Lines

Human herpesvirus 6A (HHV-6A) and HHV-6B are lymphotropic viruses which replicate in cultured activated cord blood mononuclear cells (CBMCs) and in T-cell lines. Viral genomes are composed of 143-kb unique (U) sequences flanked by ∼8- to 10-kb left and right direct repeats, DR_L and DR_R. We have recently cloned HHV-6A (U1102) into bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) vectors, employing DNA replicative intermediates. Surprisingly, HHV-6A BACs and their parental DNAs were found to contain short ∼2.7-kb DRs. To test whether DR shortening occurred during passaging in CBMCs or in the SupT1 T-cell line, we compared packaged DNAs from various passages. Restriction enzymes, PCR, and sequencing analyses have shown the following. (i) Early (1992) viral preparations from CBMCs contained ∼8-kb DRs. (ii) Viruses currently propagated in SupT1 cells contained ∼2.7-kb DRs. (iii) The deletion spans positions 60 to 5545 in DR_L, including genes encoded by DR1 through the first exon of DR6. The pac-2-pac-1 packaging signals, the DR7 open reading frame (ORF), and the DR6 second exon were not deleted. (iv) The DR_R sequence was similarly shortened by 5.4 kb. (v) The DR1 through DR6 first exon sequences were deleted from the entire HHV-6A BACs, revealing that they were not translocated into other genome locations. (vi) When virus initially cultured in CBMCs was passaged in SupT1 cells no DR shortening occurred. (vii) Viral stocks possessing short DRs replicated efficiently, revealing the plasticity of herpesvirus genomes. We conclude that the DR deletion occurred once, producing virus with advantageous growth “conquering” the population. The DR1 gene and the first DR6 exon are not required for propagation in culture.Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is a member of the Betaherpesvirus subfamily, as recently reviewed (46). The virus can enter hematopoietic cells, including T cells, B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, monocytes, and dendritic cells (DCs), as well as nonhematopoietic cells, as reviewed in references 8, 17, and 46. In culture, the virus replicates in activated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs), cord blood mononuclear cells (CBMCs), and in T-cell lines (1, 17, 46). HHV-6 isolates fall into two distinct classes designated as HHV-6A and HHV-6B variants. The two variants can be distinguished by their restriction enzyme patterns, antigenicity, DNA sequences, and disease association (1, 36, 46). HHV-6B is the causative agent of roseola infantum, a prevalent children''s disease characterized by high fever and skin rash (47). In rare cases, the virus exhibits neurotropism and has been found in children experiencing convulsions up to lethal encephalitis (1, 21, 46, 48).HHV-6B reactivation from latency was found to occur in patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment in bone marrow and other transplantations. This was associated with febrile illness, delayed transplant engraftment, and neurological involvement, up to lethal encephalitis (5, 13, 34, 46). HHV-6A has thus far no clear disease association, although several studies have suggested central nervous system (CNS) tropism, including aggravation of symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) (6, 14, 33, 41).HHV-6A and HHV-6B share general genomic architecture. The unit-length DNA molecules are approximately 160 kb, composed of a 143-kb unique (U) segment flanked by left and right direct repeats (DR_L and DR_R, respectively) (19, 24, 27, 46). The DRs are of sizes 8 to 10 kb in different viral isolates (2, 19, 24, 46). In both the HHV-6A and HHV-6B genomes, the herpesvirus conserved cleavage/packaging signals pac-1 and pac-2 (9, 15, 17) are located at the left and the right termini of the DRs (17, 19, 46). The PubMed sequence for the U1102 strain (accession no. {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"NC_001664","term_id":"1344462938","term_text":"NC_001664"}}NC_001664) starts with the pac-1 signal at positions 1 to 56, followed by multiple copies of perfect and imperfect telomere-like sequences, up to position 418. It was suggested that the telomeric repeats may have originated from host cell chromosomal telomeres (43). Additionally, the DR encodes several open reading frames (ORFs), four of which are dealt with in our paper: (i) the spliced DR1 at positions 501 to 759 and 843 to 2653; (ii) DR5 at positions 3738 to 4164; (iii) the spliced DR6 at positions 4725 to 5028 and 5837 to 6720; and (iv) an ORF of DR7, at positions 5629 to 6720, partially overlapping the DR6 gene (20). Hollsberg and coworkers (37) have recently found that the homologous gene in HHV-6B encodes a nuclear protein that forms a complex with viral DNA processivity factor p41. Gompels and coworkers have also shown that DR1 and DR6 are partly homologous to the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) US22 gene family. Both have a CXC motif: DR1 with homology to the HCMV US26 gene and DR6 with homology to the HCMV US22 gene (20). The map continues with reiterated perfect hexanucleotide telomeric sequences (GGGTAA)_n at positions 7655 to 8008 (19, 43). The number of telomeric repeats was found to vary in different viral strains (2, 43). The DR terminates with the pac-2 signal.We have recently cloned the intact HHV-6A genome into bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs), by direct cloning of unit-length DNA produced from circular or head-to-tail replication intermediates into modified BAC vectors containing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker and ampicillin-puromycin (Amp-Puro) selection cassette (3). Surprisingly, the HHV-6A BAC clones as well as the parental HHV-6A (U1102) propagated in our laboratory in SupT1 cells were found to contain DRs of ∼2.7 kb instead of the expected ∼8- to 10-kb DRs, as in the early publications (19, 24, 27, 46) and in the PubMed sequence. This has raised the following questions. When did the deleted DRs arise? What was the detailed structure of deleted DRs?HHV-6 was discovered by Gallo and colleagues in 1986 (35), and viral isolates were obtained in multiple laboratories from AIDS patients, patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, and patients with roseola infantum (12, 26, 42, 45, 47). The isolates were propagated initially in activated PBLs and CBMCs and then in continuous T-cell lines, including HSB-2, J-JHAN, SupT1, Molt-3, and MT-4 (11, 45). The U1102 strain isolated by Downing and colleagues (12) was contributed to our laboratory by Robert Honess and was propagated first in activated PBLs and CBMCs (11, 18, 36, 45) and then in J-JHAN and SupT1 T cells (4, 30). To answer the question with regard to the origin of the short DRs and their structure, we have compared earlier viral HHV-6A passages with the currently propagated virus and the HHV-6A BAC clones. We describe here the detailed structure of the DR_L and DR_R of the “new” virus, containing the short ∼2.7-kb DR. We show that the deletion contained the left multiple repeats of telomere-like sequences and the ORFs from DR1 up to the DR6 first exon. Review of viral passaging since 1992 indicated that the deletion occurred spontaneously. The deleted viruses were stably and efficiently propagated in SupT1 T cells, indicating that the DR1 and DR6 first exons are not essential for virus in vitro replication.     

Bovine Coronavirus Nonstructural Protein 1 (p28) Is an RNA Binding Protein That Binds Terminal Genomic cis-Replication Elements

Nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1), a 28-kDa protein in the bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and closely related mouse hepatitis coronavirus, is the first protein cleaved from the open reading frame 1 (ORF 1) polyprotein product of genome translation. Recently, a 30-nucleotide (nt) cis-replication stem-loop VI (SLVI) has been mapped at nt 101 to 130 within a 288-nt 5′-terminal segment of the 738-nt nsp1 cistron in a BCoV defective interfering (DI) RNA. Since a similar nsp1 coding region appears in all characterized groups 1 and 2 coronavirus DI RNAs and must be translated in cis for BCoV DI RNA replication, we hypothesized that nsp1 might regulate ORF 1 expression by binding this intra-nsp1 cistronic element. Here, we (i) establish by mutation analysis that the 72-nt intracistronic SLV immediately upstream of SLVI is also a DI RNA cis-replication signal, (ii) show by gel shift and UV-cross-linking analyses that cellular proteins of ∼60 and 100 kDa, but not viral proteins, bind SLV and SLVI, (SLV-VI) and (iii) demonstrate by gel shift analysis that nsp1 purified from Escherichia coli does not bind SLV-VI but does bind three 5′ untranslated region (UTR)- and one 3′ UTR-located cis-replication SLs. Notably, nsp1 specifically binds SLIII and its flanking sequences in the 5′ UTR with ∼2.5 μM affinity. Additionally, under conditions enabling expression of nsp1 from DI RNA-encoded subgenomic mRNA, DI RNA levels were greatly reduced, but there was only a slight transient reduction in viral RNA levels. These results together indicate that nsp1 is an RNA-binding protein that may function to regulate viral genome translation or replication but not by binding SLV-VI within its own coding region.Coronaviruses (CoVs) (59) cause primarily respiratory and gastroenteric diseases in birds and mammals (35, 71). In humans, they most commonly cause mild upper respiratory disease, but the recently discovered human CoVs (HCoVs), HCoV-NL63 (65), HCoV-HKU1 (73), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV (40) cause serious diseases in the upper and lower respiratory tracts. The SARS-CoV causes pneumonia with an accompanying high (∼10%) mortality rate (69). The ∼30-kb positive-strand CoV genome, the largest known among RNA viruses, is 5′ capped and 3′ polyadenylated and replicates in the cytoplasm (41). As with other characterized cytoplasmically replicating positive-strand RNA viruses (3), translation of the CoV genome is an early step in replication, and terminally located cis-acting RNA signals regulate translation and direct genome replication (41). How these happen mechanistically in CoVs is only beginning to be understood.In the highly studied group 2 mouse hepatitis coronavirus model (MHV A59 strain) and its close relative the bovine CoV (BCoV Mebus strain), five higher-order cis-replication signals have been identified in the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs). These include two in the 5′ UTR required for BCoV defective interfering (DI) RNA replication (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) described as stem-loop III (SLIII) (50) and SLIV (51). Recently, the SLI region in BCoV (15) has been reanalyzed along with the homologous region in MHV and is now described as comprising SL1 and SL2 (Fig. ​(Fig.1A),1A), of which SL2 has been shown to be a cis-replication structure in the context of the MHV genome (38). In the 3′ UTR, two higher-order cis-replication structures have been identified that function in both DI RNA and the MHV genome. These are a 5′-proximal bulged SL and adjacent pseudoknot that potentially act together as a unit (23, 27, 28, 72) and a 3′-proximal octamer-associated bulged SL (39, 76) (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). In addition, the 5′-terminal 65-nucleotide (nt) leader and the 3′-terminal poly(A) tail have been shown to be cis-replication signals for BCoV DI RNA (15, 60).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.RNA structures in the BCoV genome tested for nsp1 binding. (A) BCoV 5′-terminal and 3′-terminal cis-acting RNA SL structures and flanking sequences identified for BCoV DI RNA replication. Regions of the genome are identified and SL cis-replication elements are identified schematically. Open boxes at nt 100 and 211 identify AUG start codons for the short upstream ORF and ORF 1, respectively. A closed box at nt 124 identifies the UAG stop codon for the short upstream ORF. Shown below the SL structures are the RNA segments used as ³²P-labeled probes in the gel shift assays. BSL-PK, bulged SL-pseudoknot; 8mer-BSL, octamer-associated bulged SL. (B) Gel shift assays for probes when used with purified nsp1. Protein-RNA complexes identifying a shifted probe are labeled C.In CoVs, the 5′-proximal open reading frame (ORF) of ∼20 kb (called ORF 1) comprising the 5′ two-thirds of the genome is translated to overlapping polyproteins of ∼500 and ∼700 kDa, named pp1a and pp1ab (41). pp1ab is formed by a −1 ribosomal frameshift event at the ORF1a-ORF1b junction during translation (41). pp1a and pp1ab are proteolytically processed into potentially 16 nonstructural protein (nsp) end products or partial end products that are proposed to function together as the replicase (24). ORF 1a encodes nsps 1 to 11 which include papain-like proteases (nsp3), a 3C-like main protease (nsp5), membrane-anchoring proteins (nsps 4 and 6), a potential primase (nsp8), and RNA-binding proteins (nsp 7/nsp 8 complex and nsps 9 and 10) of imprecisely understood function (19, 20, 24, 25, 29, 43, 49, 77). ORF 1b encodes nsps 12 to 16 which function as an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, a helicase, an exonuclease, an endonuclease, and a 2′-O-methyltransferase, respectively (6, 17, 24, 44). 3′ Proximal genomic ORFs encoding structural and accessory proteins are translated from a 3′-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs (sgmRNAs) (41).The N-terminal ORF 1a protein, nsp1, in the case of BCoV and MHV is also named p28 to identify the cleaved 28-kDa product (18). The precise role of nsp1 in virus replication has not been determined, but it is known that a sequence encoding an N-proximal nsp1 region in MHV (nt 255 to 369 in the 738-nt coding sequence) cannot be deleted from the genome without loss of productive infection (10). nsp1 also directly binds nsp7 and nsp10 (11) and by confocal microscopy is found associated with the membranous replication complex (10, 66) and virus assembly sites (11). The amino acid sequence of nsp1 is poorly conserved among CoVs, indicating that it may be a protein that interacts with cellular components (1, 58). In the absence of other viral proteins, MHV nsp1 induces general host mRNA degradation (79) and cell cycle arrest (16). The SARS-CoV nsp1 homolog, a 20-kDa protein, has been reported to cause mRNA degradation (30, 45), inhibition of host protein synthesis (30, 45, 70), inhibition of interferon signaling (70, 79), and cytokine dysregulation in lung cells (36).In this study, we examine the RNA-binding properties of BCoV nsp1 with the hypothesis that it is a potential regulator of translation or replication through its binding of SLVI mapping within its coding region. The rationale for this hypothesis stems from five observations. (i) In the BCoV DI RNA, the 5′-terminal one-third (approximately) of the nsp1 cistron and the entire nucleocapsid (N) protein cistron together comprise the single contiguous ORF in the DI RNA, and most of both coding regions appear required for DI RNA replication (15). (ii) The partial nsp1 cistron in the DI RNA must be translated in cis for DI RNA replication in helper virus-infected cells (12, 14). (iii) A similar part of the nsp1 cistron is found in the genome of all characterized naturally occurring group 1 and 2 CoV DI RNAs described to date (7, 8). (iv) A cis-acting SL named SLVI is found within the partial nsp1 cistron in the BCoV DI RNA (12). (v) Translation, which involves a 5′→3′ transit of ribosomes, and negative-strand synthesis, which involves a 3′→5′ transit of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, cannot simultaneously occur on the same molecule with a single ORF (4, 31). Thus, to enable genome replication an inhibition of translation at least early in infection for cytoplasmically replicating positive-strand RNA viruses is required (4, 5, 22, 32). Mechanisms of translation inhibition have been described for the Qβ viral genome, wherein the viral replicase autoregulates translation by binding an intracistronic cis-replication element (32), and for the polio virus genome, wherein genome circularization inhibits the early translation step (5, 22). Therefore, since nsp1 is synthesized early and also contains an intracistronic cis-replication element, we postulated that it is autoregulatory with RNA binding properties.Here, we do the following: (i) demonstrate by mutagenesis analysis that the 72-nt SLV, mapping immediately upstream of SLVI and within the partial nsp1 cistron, is also a cis-acting DI RNA replication element; (ii) show by gel shift and UV cross-linking analyses that there is likely no binding of an intracellular viral protein to SLV and SLVI (SLV-VI), but there is binding of unidentified cellular proteins of ∼60 and 100 kDa; and (iii) show by gel shift analysis that recombinant nsp1 purified from Escherichia coli does not bind SLV-VI but does bind SLs I to IV in the 5′ UTR and also the 3′-terminal bulged SL in the 3′ UTR, suggesting a possible regulatory role at these sites. Notably, specific binding with ∼2.5 μM affinity of nsp1 to SLIII and its flanking regions in the 5′ UTR was observed. Additionally, we show that, under conditions that would express nsp1 from a DI RNA-encoded sgmRNA, DI RNA levels are greatly reduced; viral RNA species levels, however, are reduced only slightly, and this reduction is transient. These results together indicate that nsp1 is an RNA-binding protein that may function as a regulator of viral translation or replication but not through its binding of cis-acting SLs V and VI within its own cistron.     

The S Helix Mediates Signal Transmission as a HAMP Domain Coiled-Coil Extension in the NarX Nitrate Sensor from Escherichia coli K-12

In the nitrate-responsive, homodimeric NarX sensor, two cytoplasmic membrane α-helices delimit the periplasmic ligand-binding domain. The HAMP domain, a four-helix parallel coiled-coil built from two α-helices (HD1 and HD2), immediately follows the second transmembrane helix. Previous computational studies identified a likely coiled-coil-forming α-helix, the signaling helix (S helix), in a range of signaling proteins, including eucaryal receptor guanylyl cyclases, but its function remains obscure. In NarX, the HAMP HD2 and S-helix regions overlap and apparently form a continuous coiled-coil marked by a heptad repeat stutter discontinuity at the distal boundary of HD2. Similar composite HD2-S-helix elements are present in other sensors, such as Sln1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We constructed deletions and missense substitutions in the NarX S helix. Most caused constitutive signaling phenotypes. However, strongly impaired induction phenotypes were conferred by heptad deletions within the S-helix conserved core and also by deletions that remove the heptad stutter. The latter observation illuminates a key element of the dynamic bundle hypothesis for signaling across the heptad stutter adjacent to the HAMP domain in methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (Q. Zhou, P. Ames, and J. S. Parkinson, Mol. Microbiol. 73:801-814, 2009). Sequence comparisons identified other examples of heptad stutters between a HAMP domain and a contiguous coiled-coil-like heptad repeat sequence in conventional sensors, such as CpxA, EnvZ, PhoQ, and QseC; other S-helix-containing sensors, such as BarA and TorS; and the Neurospora crassa Nik-1 (Os-1) sensor that contains a tandem array of alternating HAMP and HAMP-like elements. Therefore, stutter elements may be broadly important for HAMP function.Transmembrane signaling in homodimeric bacterial sensors initiates upon signal ligand binding to the extracytoplasmic domain. In methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), the resulting conformational change causes a displacement of one transmembrane α-helix (TM α-helix) relative to the other. This motion is conducted by the HAMP domain to control output domain activity (reviewed in references 33 and 39).Certain sensors of two-component regulatory systems share topological organization with MCPs. For example, the paralogous nitrate sensors NarX and NarQ contain an amino-terminal transmembrane signaling module similar to those in MCPs, in which a pair of TM α-helices delimit the periplasmic ligand-binding domain (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (24) (reviewed in references 32 and 62). The second TM α-helix connects to the HAMP domain. Hybrid proteins in which the NarX transmembrane signaling module regulates the kinase control modules of the MCPs Tar, DifA, and FrzCD demonstrate that NarX and MCPs share a mechanism for transmembrane signaling (73, 74, 81, 82).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.NarX modular structure. Linear representation of the NarX protein sequence, from the amino (N) to carboxyl (C) termini, drawn to scale. The four modules are indicated at the top of the figure and shown in bold typeface, whereas domains within each module are labeled with standard (lightface) typeface. The nomenclature for modules follows that devised by Swain and Falke (67) for MCPs. Overlap between the HAMP domain HD2 and S-helix elements is indicated in gray. The three conserved Cys residues within the central module (62) are indicated. TM1 and TM2 denote the two transmembrane helices. Helices H1 to H4 of the periplasmic domain (24), and the transmitter domain H, N, D, G (79), and X (41) boxes, are labeled. The HPK 7 family of transmitter sequences, including NarX, have no F box and an unconventional G box (79). The scale bar at the bottom of the figure shows the number of aminoacyl residues.The HAMP domain functions as a signal conversion module in a variety of homodimeric proteins, including histidine protein kinases, adenylyl cyclases, MCPs, and certain phosphatases (12, 20, 77). This roughly 50-residue domain consists of a pair of amphiphilic α-helices, termed HD1 and HD2 (formerly AS1 and AS2) (67), joined by a connector (Fig. ​(Fig.2A).2A). Results from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, Cys and disulfide scanning, and mutational analysis converge on a model in which the HD1 and HD2 α-helices form a four-helix parallel coiled-coil (7, 20, 30, 42, 67, 75, 84). The mechanisms through which HAMP domains mediate signal conduction remain to be established (30, 42, 67, 84) (for commentary, see references 43, 49, and 50).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.HAMP domain extensions. (A) Sequences from representative MCPs (E. coli Tsr and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium Tar) and S-helix-containing sensors (E. coli NarX, NarQ, and BarA, and S. cerevisiae Sln1p). The HAMP domain, S-helix element, and the initial sequence of the MCP adaptation region are indicated. Flanking numbers denote positions of the terminal residues within the overall sequence. Sequential heptad repeats are indicated in alternating bold and standard (lightface) typeface. Numbering for heptad repeats in the methylation region and S-helix sequences has been described previously (4, 8). Numbers within the HD1 and HD2 helices indicate interactions within the HAMP domain (42). Residues at heptad positions a and d are enclosed within boxes, residues at the stutter position a/d are enclosed within a thickly outlined box, and residues in the S-helix ERT signature are in bold typeface. (B) NarX mutational alterations. Deletions are depicted as boxes, and missense substitutions are shown above the sequence. Many of these deletions were reported previously (10) and are presented here for comparison. The phenotypes conferred by the alterations are indicated as follows: impaired induction, black box; constitutive and elevated basal, light gray box; reversed response, dark gray box; wild-type, white box; null, striped box.Coiled-coils result from packing of two or more α-helices (27). The primary sequence of coiled-coils exhibits a characteristic heptad repeat pattern, denoted as a-b-c-d-e-f-g (52, 61), in which positions a and d are usually occupied by nonpolar residues (reviewed in references 1, 47, and 80). For example, the coiled-coil nature of the HAMP domain can be seen in the heptad repeat patterns within the HD1 and HD2 sequences (Fig. ​(Fig.2A2A).Coiled-coil elements adjacent to the HAMP domain have been identified in several sensors, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sln1p (69) and Escherichia coli NarX (60). Recently, this element was defined as a specific type of dimeric parallel coiled-coil, termed the signaling helix (S helix), present in a wide range of signaling proteins (8). Sequence comparisons delimit a roughly 40-residue element with a conserved heptad repeat pattern (Fig. ​(Fig.2A).2A). Based on mutational analyses of Sln1p and other proteins, the S helix is suggested to function as a switch that prevents constitutive activation of adjacent output domains (8).The term “signaling helix” previously was used to define the α4-TM2 extended helix in MCPs (23, 33). Here, we use the term S helix to denote the element described by Anantharaman et al. (8).The NarX and NarQ sensors encompass four distinct modules (Fig. ​(Fig.1):1): the amino-terminal transmembrane signaling module, the signal conversion module (including the HAMP domain and S-helix element), the central module of unknown function, and the carboxyl-terminal transmitter module (62). The S-helix element presumably functions together with the HAMP domain in conducting ligand-responsive motions from the transmembrane signaling module to the central module, ultimately regulating transmitter module activity.Regulatory output by two-component sensors reflects opposing transmitter activities (reviewed in reference 55). Positive function results from transmitter autokinase activity; the resulting phosphosensor serves as a substrate for response regulator autophosphorylation. Negative function results from transmitter phosphatase activity, which accelerates phosphoresponse regulator autodephosphorylation (reviewed in references 64 and 65). We envision a homogeneous two-state model for NarX (17), in which the equilibrium between these mutually exclusive conformations is modulated by ligand-responsive signaling.Previous work from our laboratory concerned the NarX and other HAMP domains (9, 10, 26, 77) and separately identified a conserved sequence in NarX and NarQ sensors, the Y box, that roughly corresponds to the S helix (62). Therefore, we were interested to explore the NarX S helix and to test some of the predictions made for its function. Results show that the S helix is critical for signal conduction and suggest that it functions as an extension of the HAMP HD2 α-helix in a subset of sensors exemplified by Sln1p and NarX. Moreover, a stutter discontinuity in the heptad repeat pattern was found to be essential for the NarX response to signal and to be conserved in several distinct classes of HAMP-containing sensors.     

RNA Structures Required for Production of Subgenomic Flavivirus RNA

Flaviviruses are a group of single-stranded, positive-sense RNA viruses causing ∼100 million infections per year. We have recently shown that flaviviruses produce a unique, small, noncoding RNA (∼0.5 kb) derived from the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the genomic RNA (gRNA), which is required for flavivirus-induced cytopathicity and pathogenicity (G. P. Pijlman et al., Cell Host Microbe, 4: 579-591, 2008). This RNA (subgenomic flavivirus RNA [sfRNA]) is a product of incomplete degradation of gRNA presumably by the cellular 5′-3′ exoribonuclease XRN1, which stalls on the rigid secondary structure stem-loop II (SL-II) located at the beginning of the 3′ UTR. Mutations or deletions of various secondary structures in the 3′ UTR resulted in the loss of full-length sfRNA (sfRNA1) and production of smaller and less abundant sfRNAs (sfRNA2 and sfRNA3). Here, we investigated in detail the importance of West Nile virus Kunjin (WNV_KUN) 3′ UTR secondary structures as well as tertiary interactions for sfRNA formation. We show that secondary structures SL-IV and dumbbell 1 (DB1) downstream of SL-II are able to prevent further degradation of gRNA when the SL-II structure is deleted, leading to production of sfRNA2 and sfRNA3, respectively. We also show that a number of pseudoknot (PK) interactions, in particular PK1 stabilizing SL-II and PK3 stabilizing DB1, are required for protection of gRNA from nuclease degradation and production of sfRNA. Our results show that PK interactions play a vital role in the production of nuclease-resistant sfRNA, which is essential for viral cytopathicity in cells and pathogenicity in mice.Arthropod-borne flaviviruses such as West Nile virus (WNV), dengue virus (DENV), and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) cause major outbreaks of potentially fatal disease and affect over 50 million people every year. The highly pathogenic North American strain of WNV (WNV_NY99) has already claimed more than 1,000 lives with over 27,000 cases reported since its emergence in New York in 1999 and has raised global public health concerns (9). In contrast, the closely related Australian strain of WNV, WNV_KUN, is highly attenuated and does not cause overt disease in humans and animals (11). WNV_KUN has been used extensively as a model virus to study flavivirus replication and flavivirus-host interactions (13, 14, 16-19, 26, 38, 39).The ∼11-kb positive-stranded, capped WNV genomic RNA (gRNA) lacks a poly(A) tail and consists of 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) flanking one open reading frame, which encodes the viral proteins required for the viral life cycle (6, 15, 38, 39). Flavivirus UTRs are involved in translation and initiation of RNA replication and likely determine genome packaging (13, 14, 16, 21, 30, 39-41). Both the 5′ UTR (∼100 nucleotides [nt] in size) and the 3′ UTR (from ∼400 to 700 nucleotides) can form secondary and tertiary structures which are highly conserved among mosquito-borne flaviviruses (1, 8, 10, 14, 29, 32, 34). More specifically, the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR consists of several conserved regions and secondary structures (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) which were previously predicted or shown to exist in various flaviviruses by computational and chemical analyses, respectively (4, 10, 25, 26, 29-32). The 5′ end of the 3′ UTR starts with an AU-rich region which can form stem-loop structure I (SL-I) followed by SL-II, which we previously showed to be vitally important for subgenomic flavivirus RNA (sfRNA) production (26; see also below). SL-II is followed by a short, repeated conserved hairpin (RCS3) and SL-III (26). Further downstream of SL-III are the SL-IV and CS3 structures, which are remarkably similar to the preceding SL-II-RCS3 structure (26, 29). Further downstream of the SL-IV-CS3 structure are dumbbells 1 and 2 (DB1 and DB2, respectively) followed by a short SL and the 3′ SL (25, 26).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.(A) Model of the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR RNA structure. Highlighted in bold are the secondary structures investigated here. Dashed lines indicate putative PKs. The two sites of the putative PK interactions are shown in open boxes. sfRNA1, -2, -3, and -4 start sites are indicated by arrows. (R)CS, (repeated) conserved sequence; DB, dumbbell structure; PK, pseudoknot; SL, stem-loop. (B) Structural model of PK1 in SL-II with disruptive mutations. Nucleotide numbering is from the end of the 3′ UTR. The sfRNA1 start is indicated by an arrow. Nucleotides forming PK1 are on a gray background, and mutated nucleotides are white on a black background. (C) Sequences mutated in the different constructs. Nucleotides in the wt PK sequences used for mutations are bold and underlined. Introduced mutations are shown under the corresponding nucleotides in the wt sequence.The described structures have been investigated in some detail for their requirement in RNA replication and translation. Generally, a progressive negative effect on viral growth was shown with progressive deletions into the 3′-proximal region of the JEV 3′ UTR (41). However, only a relatively short region of the JEV 3′ UTR, consisting of the 3′-terminal 193 nt, was shown to be absolutely essential for gRNA replication (41). The minimal region for DENV replication was reported to be even shorter (23). Extensive analysis has shown that the most 3′-terminal, essential regions of the 3′ UTR include the cyclization sequence and 3′ SL, which are required for efficient RNA replication (2, 14, 16, 23, 35). As we showed, deletion of SL-II or SL-I did not overtly affect WNV_KUN replication (26). However, deletion of CS2, RCS2, CS3, or RCS3 in WNV replicon RNA significantly reduced RNA replication but not translation (20), indicating that these elements facilitate but are not essential for RNA replication. In addition, it was shown that deletion of DB1 or DB2 resulted in a viable mutant virus that was reduced in growth efficiency, while deletion of both DB structures resulted in a nonviable mutant (23).In addition to the above-mentioned secondary stem-loop structures, computational and chemical analysis of the flavivirus 3′ UTR suggested the presence of 5 pseudoknot (PK) interactions (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (25, 26, 32). A PK is a structure formed upon base pairing of a single-stranded region of RNA in the loop of a hairpin to a stretch of complementary nucleotides elsewhere in the RNA chain (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). These structures are referred to as hairpin type (H-type) PKs (3), and they usually stabilize secondary RNA structures. Typically, the final tertiary structure does not significantly alter the preformed secondary structure (5). In general, PK interactions have been shown to be important in biological processes such as initiation and/or elongation of translation, initiation of gRNA replication, and ribosomal frameshifting for a number of different viruses, including flaviviruses (reviewed in references 3 and 22). The first PK in the WNV 3′ UTR was predicted to form in SL-II, followed by a similar PK in SL-IV (26) (PK1 and PK2 in Fig. ​Fig.1A).1A). For the DENV, yellow fever virus (YFV), and JEV subgroup of flaviviruses, two PKs further downstream were predicted to form between DB1 and DB2 and corresponding single-stranded RNA regions located further downstream (25) (PK3 and PK4 in Fig. ​Fig.1A).1A). The formation of these structures is supported by covariations in the WNV RNAs. In addition, a PK was proposed to form between a short SL and the 3′ SL at the 3′ terminus of the viral genome (32) (PK5 in Fig. ​Fig.1A1A).Importantly, in addition to its role in viral replication and translation, we have shown that the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR is important for the production of a small noncoding RNA fragment designated sfRNA (26). This short RNA fragment of ∼0.5 kb is derived from the 3′ UTR of the gRNA and exclusively produced by the members of the Flavivirus genus of the Flaviviridae family, where it is required for efficient viral replication, cytopathicity, and pathogenicity (26). Our studies suggested that sfRNA is a product of incomplete degradation of the gRNA presumably by the cellular 5′-3′ exoribonuclease XRN1, resulting from XRN1 stalling on the rigid secondary/tertiary structures located at the beginning of the 3′ UTR (26). XRN1 is an exoribonuclease which usually degrades mRNA from the 5′ to the 3′ end as part of cellular mRNA decay and turnover (33), and it was shown previously that XRN1 can be stalled by SL structures (28). Mutations or deletions of WNV 3′ UTR secondary structures resulted in the loss of full-length sfRNA (sfRNA1) and production of smaller and less abundant sfRNAs (sfRNA2 and sfRNA3) (26). In particular, SL-II (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) was shown to be important for sfRNA1 production; deletion of this structure either alone or in conjunction with other structures located downstream of SL-II abolished sfRNA1 production, leading to the production of the smaller RNA fragments sfRNA2 and sfRNA3.Here, we extended our investigation and studied the importance of several predicted 3′ UTR secondary structures and PK interactions for the production of sfRNA. To further understand the generation mechanism of sfRNA and its requirements, we deleted or mutated a number of RNA structures in the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR and investigated the size and amount of sfRNA generated from these mutant RNAs. The results show that not only SLs but also PK interactions play a vital role in stabilizing the 3′ UTR RNA and preventing complete degradation of viral gRNA to produce nuclease-resistant sfRNA, which is required for efficient virus replication and cytopathicity in cells and virulence in mice.     

Infection with Strains of Citrus Tristeza Virus Does Not Exclude Superinfection by Other Strains of the Virus

Superinfection exclusion or homologous interference, a phenomenon in which a primary viral infection prevents a secondary infection with the same or closely related virus, has been observed commonly for viruses in various systems, including viruses of bacteria, plants, and animals. With plant viruses, homologous interference initially was used as a test of virus relatedness to define whether two virus isolates were “strains” of the same virus or represented different viruses, and subsequently purposeful infection with a mild isolate was implemented as a protective measure against isolates of the virus causing severe disease. In this study we examined superinfection exclusion of Citrus tristeza virus (CTV), a positive-sense RNA closterovirus. Thirteen naturally occurring isolates of CTV representing five different virus strains and a set of isolates originated from virus constructs engineered based on an infectious cDNA clone of T36 isolate of CTV, including hybrids containing sequences from different isolates, were examined for their ability to prevent superinfection by another isolate of the virus. We show that superinfection exclusion occurred only between isolates of the same strain and not between isolates of different strains. When isolates of the same strain were used for sequential plant inoculation, the primary infection provided complete exclusion of the challenge isolate, whereas isolates from heterologous strains appeared to have no effect on replication, movement or systemic infection by the challenge virus. Surprisingly, substitution of extended cognate sequences from isolates of the T68 or T30 strains into T36 did not confer the ability of resulting hybrid viruses to exclude superinfection by those donor strains. Overall, these results do not appear to be explained by mechanisms proposed previously for other viruses. Moreover, these observations bring an understanding of some previously unexplained fundamental features of CTV biology and, most importantly, build a foundation for the strategy of selecting mild isolates that would efficiently exclude severe virus isolates as a practical means to control CTV diseases.Superinfection exclusion or homologous interference is a phenomenon in which a preexisting viral infection prevents a secondary infection with the same or a closely related virus, whereas infection by unrelated viruses can be unaffected. The phenomenon was first observed by McKinney (57, 58) between two genotypes of Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and later with bacteriophages (21, 94). Since that time, the phenomenon has been observed often for viruses of animals (1, 13, 18, 34, 43, 47, 50, 85, 86-88, 102, 103) and plants (11, 30, 31, 32, 39, 40, 49, 77, 99, 100). In plant virology, homologous interference initially was used as a test of virus relatedness to define whether two virus isolates were “strains” of the same virus or represented different viruses (58, 77). Subsequently, it was developed into a management tool to reduce crop losses by purposely infecting plants with mild isolates of a virus to reduce infection and losses due to more severe isolates, which is referred to as “cross-protection” (reviewed in references 32 and 40).Homologous superinfection exclusion of animal viruses has been related to several mechanisms acting at various stages of the viral life cycle, including prevention of the incoming virus entry into cells (50, 86, 87), or inhibition of translation or interference with replication (1, 47, 50, 83). Several mechanisms have been postulated for homologous interference of plant viruses, including prevention of the disassembly of the challenge virus as it enters the cell resulting from the expression of the coat protein of the protector virus (67, 84; reviewed in reference 10) and induction of RNA silencing by the protector virus that leads to sequence-specific degradation of the challenge virus RNA (24, 69, 70). However, common mechanisms of superinfection exclusion, expected to be associated with the viruses of plants and animals, have not been elucidated.Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) is the largest and most complex member of the Closteroviridae family, which contains viruses with mono-, bi-, and tripartite genomes transmitted by a range of insect vectors, including aphids, whiteflies, and mealybugs (3, 6, 19, 20, 46). CTV has long flexuous virions (2,000 nm by 10 to 12 nm) encapsidated by two coat proteins and a single-stranded RNA genome of ∼19.3 kb. The major coat protein (CP) covers ca. 97% of the genomic RNA, and the minor coat protein (CPm) completes encapsidation of the genome at its 5′ end (25, 81). The RNA genome of CTV encodes 12 open reading frames (ORFs) (44, 64) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). ORFs 1a and 1b are expressed from the genomic RNA and encode polyproteins required for virus replication. ORF 1a encodes a 349-kDa polyprotein containing two papainlike protease domains plus methyltransferaselike and helicaselike domains. Translation of the polyprotein is thought to occasionally continue through the polymerase-like domain (ORF 1b) by a +1 frameshift. Ten 3′-end ORFs are expressed by 3′-coterminal subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs) (37, 45) and encode the following proteins: major (CP) and minor (CPm) coat proteins, p65 (HSP70 homolog), and p61 that are involved in assembly of virions (79); a hydrophobic p6 protein with a proposed role in virus movement (20, 89); p20 and p23, which along with CP are suppressors of RNA silencing (54); and p33, p13, and p18, whose functions remain unknown. Remarkably, citrus trees can be infected with mutants with three genes deleted: p33, p18, and p13 (89).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.(A) Schematic diagram of the genome organization of wild-type CTV (CTV9R) and its derivative CTV-BC5/GFP encoding GFP. The open boxes represent ORFs and their translation products. PRO, papainlike protease domain; MT, methyltransferase; HEL, helicase; RdRp, an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; HSP70h, HSP70 homolog; CPm, minor coat protein; CP, major coat protein; GFP, green fluorescent protein. Bent arrows indicate positions of BYV (B_CP) or CTV CP (C_CP) sgRNA controller elements. Inserted elements are shown in gray. (B) Scheme of the “superinfection exclusion assay.” Young Madam Vinous sweet orange trees were initially inoculated with one of 13 tested CTV isolates. When primary infections were established, the trees were subsequently challenged with CTV-BC5/GFP. All inoculations were done by grafting of the infected tissue into the stem of a tree. The positions of primary (Pri) and challenge (Chl) graft inoculations are shown. The ability of the challenge virus to superinfect trees was determined by visual observation of GFP fluorescence in phloem-associated cells on the internal surface of bark from a young flash starting at about 2 months upon challenge inoculation. Scale bar, 0.4 mm.The host range of CTV is limited to citrus in which the virus infects only phloem-associated cells. CTV consists of numerous isolates that have distinctive biological and genetic characteristics (38, 48, 56, 72, 74, 75, 95). Recently, a classification strategy for CTV isolates was proposed based on sequence similarity. Analysis of nearly 400 isolates in an international collection revealed five major CTV genotype groups with some isolates undefined (38). For the purposes of the present study, strains are defined as phylogenetically distinct lineages of CTV based upon analysis of nucleotide sequences of the 1a ORF (38). This region of the genome shows high genetic diversity between CTV variants, with levels of sequence identity ranging between 72.3 to 90.3% (38, 48, 52, 74, 75; M. Hilf, unpublished data). Using this definition, T3, T30, T36, VT, and T68 are designated as strains. Individual virus samples are designated as isolates of one of these strains. The ORF 1a nucleotide sequences of isolates of the T36 and T68 strains are equally dissimilar to isolates of the T3, T30, and VT strains, with identities of 72.9, 73, and 72.4% and 77.6, 77.9, and 76.8%, respectively. Identities of ORF 1a range from 89.4 to 90.3% between isolates of the T3, T30, and VT strains. Sequences of ORF1a of isolates belonging to the T36 strain and those from the T68 strain show 72.3% identity. This compares to a range of 89 to 94.8% identity found in the more conserved 3′-half regions of the genomes of isolates from different CTV strains. Each strain is named after a “type isolate” and is composed of isolates with minor sequence divergence (generally less than 5% throughout genome) from the type member. However, isolates of a strain may have significant variations in symptoms and symptoms severity. Remarkably, field trees harbor complex populations of CTV, which are often composed of mixtures of different strains and recombinants between these strains (36, 48, 52, 68, 75, 96, 101). The genetic basis of such frequent coexistence of different strains within the same tree is unknown.CTV causes economically important diseases of citrus worldwide. One of the most effective management tools has been cross-protection when effective protecting isolates could be found. Preinfection with mild isolates allows commercial production of sweet oranges and limes in Brazil (16) and Peru (9) and grapefruit in South Africa (92). However, identification of protecting isolates has been empirical, difficult, and rare. Cross-protection usually has worked only in certain varieties, and the lack of effective protecting isolates has prevented its use in many varieties and citrus growing areas (15, 41, 61, 73). In general, there has been no understanding why some mild isolates were effective and others failed to protect. Because CTV diseases prevail in citrus growing areas worldwide, elucidation of the mechanisms of exclusion of one CTV variant by another one is an important goal.In the present study we examined relationships between different genotypes of CTV in terms of their ability to prevent superinfection by another isolate of the virus. We show that superinfection exclusion occurred only between minor genetic variants of the same strain (sequence group) and not between isolates of different strains. When isolates of the same strain were used for sequential plant inoculation, the primary infection provided full exclusion of the challenge isolate. In all combinations of virus isolates belonging to different strains, the primary infection of plants with one strain had no noticeable effect on the establishment of the secondary infection. The results obtained here help elucidate some previously unexplained fundamental features of CTV biology and pose the possibility of an existence of a novel mechanism for superinfection exclusion between virus variants.     

Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Production of Novel Cyanophycins with an Extended Range of Constituent Amino Acids

Cyanophycin (multi-l-arginyl-poly-l-aspartic acid; also known as cyanophycin grana peptide [CGP]) is a putative precursor for numerous biodegradable technically used chemicals. Therefore, the biosynthesis and production of the polymer in recombinant organisms is of special interest. The synthesis of cyanophycin derivatives consisting of a wider range of constituents would broaden the applications of this polymer. We applied recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains defective in arginine metabolism and expressing the cyanophycin synthetase of Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6308 in order to synthesize CGP with citrulline and ornithine as constituents. Strains defective in arginine degradation (Car1 and Car2) accumulated up to 4% (wt/wt) CGP, whereas strains defective in arginine synthesis (Arg1, Arg3, and Arg4) accumulated up to 15.3% (wt/wt) of CGP, which is more than twofold higher than the previously content reported in yeast and the highest content ever reported in eukaryotes. Characterization of the isolated polymers by different analytical methods indicated that CGP synthesized by strain Arg1 (with argininosuccinate synthetase deleted) consisted of up to 20 mol% of citrulline, whereas CGP from strain Arg3 (with ornithine carbamoyltransferase deleted) consisted of up to 8 mol% of ornithine, and CGP isolated from strain Arg4 (with argininosuccinate lyase deleted) consisted of up to 16 mol% lysine. Cultivation experiments indicated that the incorporation of citrulline or ornithine is enhanced by the addition of low amounts of arginine (2 mM) and also by the addition of ornithine or citrulline (10 to 40 mM), respectively, to the medium.Cyanophycin (multi-l-arginyl-poly-[l-aspartic acid]), also referred to as cyanophycin grana peptide (CGP), represents a polydisperse nonribosomally synthesized polypeptide consisting of poly(aspartic acid) as backbone and arginine residues bound to each aspartate (49) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). One enzyme only, referred to as cyanophycin synthetase (CphA), catalyzes the synthesis of the polymer from amino acids (55). Several CphAs originating from different bacteria exhibit specific features (2, 7, 5, 32, 50, 51). CphAs from the cyanobacteria Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6308 and Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413, respectively, exhibit a wide substrate range in vitro (2, 7), whereas CphA from Acinetobacter baylyi or Nostoc ellipsosporum incorporates only aspartate and arginine (23, 24, 32). CphA from Thermosynechococcus elongatus catalyzes the synthesis of CGP primer independently (5); CphA from Synechococcus sp. strain MA19 exhibits high thermostability (22). Furthermore, two types of CGP were observed concerning its solubility behavior: (i) a water-insoluble type that becomes soluble at high or low pH (34, 48) and (ii) a water-soluble type that was only recently observed in recombinant organisms (19, 26, 42, 50, 56). In the past, bacteria were mainly applied for the synthesis of CGP (3, 14, 18, 53), whereas recently there has been greater interest in synthesis in eukaryotes (26, 42, 50). CGP was accumulated to almost 7% (wt/wt) of dry matter in recombinant Nicotiana tabacum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (26, 50).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Chemical structures of dipeptide building blocks of CGP variants detected in vivo. Structure: 1, aspartate-arginine; 2, aspartate-lysine; 3, aspartate-citrulline; 4, aspartate-ornithine. Aspartic acid is presented in black; the second amino acid of the dipeptide building blocks is shown in gray. The nomenclature of the carbon atoms is given.In S. cerevisiae the arginine metabolism is well understood and has been investigated (30) (see Fig. ​Fig.2).2). Arginine is synthesized from glutamate via ornithine and citrulline in eight successive steps. The enzymes acetylglutamate synthase, acetylglutamate kinase, N-acetyl-γ-glutamylphosphate reductase, and acetylornithine aminotransferase are involved in the formation of N-α-acetylornithine. The latter is converted to ornithine by acetylornithine acetyltransferase. In the next step, ornithine carbamoyltransferase (ARG3) condenses ornithine with carbamoylphosphate, yielding citrulline. Citrulline is then converted to l-argininosuccinate by argininosuccinate synthetase. The latter is in the final step cleaved into fumarate and arginine by argininosuccinate lyase (ARG4). The first five steps occur in the mitochondria, whereas the last three reactions occur in the cytosol (28, 54). Arginine degradation is initiated by arginase (CAR1) and ornithine aminotransferase (CAR2) (10, 11, 38, 39).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Schematic overview of the arginine metabolism in S. cerevisiae. Reactions shown in the shaded area occur in the mitochondria, while the other reactions are catalyzed in the cytosol. Abbreviations: ARG2, acetylglutamate synthase; ARG6, acetylglutamate kinase; ARG5, N-acetyl-γ-glutamyl-phosphate reductase; ARG8, acetylornithine aminotransferase; ECM40, acetylornithine acetyltransferase; ARG1, argininosuccinate synthetase; ARG3, ornithine carbamoyltransferase; ARG4, argininosuccinate lyase; CAR1, arginase; CAR2, ornithine aminotransferase.A multitude of putative applications for CGP derivatives are available (29, 41, 45, 47), thus indicating a need for efficient biotechnological production and for further investigations concerning the synthesis of CGP with alternative properties and different constituents. It is not only the putative application of the polymer as a precursor for poly(aspartic acid), which is used as biodegradable alternative for poly(acrylic acid) or for bulk chemicals, that makes CGP interesting (29, 45-47). In addition, a recently developed process for the production of dipeptides from CGP as a precursor makes the synthesis of CGP variants worthwhile (43). Dipeptides play an important role in medicine and pharmacy, e.g., as additives for malnourished patients, as treatments against liver diseases, or as aids for muscle proliferation (43). Because dipeptides are synthesized chemically (40) or enzymatically (6), novel biotechnological production processes are welcome.     

Interactions of DNA with Biofilm-Derived Membrane Vesicles

The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms. Biofilm-derived membrane vesicles (MVs) and DNA, both matrix components, demonstrated concentration-, pH-, and cation-dependent interactions. Furthermore, MV-DNA association influenced MV surface properties. This bears consequences for the reactivity and availability for interaction of matrix polymers and other constituents.The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms and is crucial for the development of fundamental biofilm properties (46, 47). Early studies defined polysaccharides as the matrix component, but proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids are all now acknowledged as important contributors (7, 15). Indeed, DNA has emerged as a vital participant, fulfilling structural and functional roles (1, 5, 6, 19, 31, 34, 36, 41, 43, 44). The phosphodiester bond of DNA renders this polyanionic at a physiological pH, undoubtedly contributing to interactions with cations, humic substances, fine-dispersed minerals, and matrix entities (25, 41, 49).In addition to particulates such as flagella and pili, membrane vesicles (MVs) are also found within the matrices of gram-negative and mixed biofilms (3, 16, 40). MVs are multifunctional bilayered structures that bleb from the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria (reviewed in references 4, 24, 27, 28, and 30) and are chemically heterogeneous, combining the known chemistries of the biofilm matrix. Examination of biofilm samples by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has suggested that matrix material interacts with MVs (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Since MVs produced in planktonic culture have associated DNA (11, 12, 13, 20, 21, 30, 39, 48), could biofilm-derived MVs incorporate DNA (1, 39, 40, 44)?Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Possible interactions between matrix polymers and particulate structures. Shown is an electron micrograph of a thin section through a P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm. During processing, some dehydration occurred, resulting in collapse of matrix material into fibrillate arrangements (black filled arrows). There is a suggestion of interactions occurring with particulate structures such as MVs (hollow white arrow) and flagella (filled white arrows) (identified by the appearance and cross-dimension of these highly ordered structures when viewed at high magnification), which was consistently observed with other embedded samples and also with whole-mount preparations of gently disrupted biofilms (data not shown). The scale bar represents 200 nm.     

Genome-Scale Phylogenetic Analyses of Chikungunya Virus Reveal Independent Emergences of Recent Epidemics and Various Evolutionary Rates

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), a mosquito-borne alphavirus, has traditionally circulated in Africa and Asia, causing human febrile illness accompanied by severe, chronic joint pain. In Africa, epidemic emergence of CHIKV involves the transition from an enzootic, sylvatic cycle involving arboreal mosquito vectors and nonhuman primates, into an urban cycle where peridomestic mosquitoes transmit among humans. In Asia, however, CHIKV appears to circulate only in the endemic, urban cycle. Recently, CHIKV emerged into the Indian Ocean and the Indian subcontinent to cause major epidemics. To examine patterns of CHIKV evolution and the origins of these outbreaks, as well as to examine whether evolutionary rates that vary between enzootic and epidemic transmission, we sequenced the genomes of 40 CHIKV strains and performed a phylogenetic analysis representing the most comprehensive study of its kind to date. We inferred that extant CHIKV strains evolved from an ancestor that existed within the last 500 years and that some geographic overlap exists between two main enzootic lineages previously thought to be geographically separated within Africa. We estimated that CHIKV was introduced from Africa into Asia 70 to 90 years ago. The recent Indian Ocean and Indian subcontinent epidemics appear to have emerged independently from the mainland of East Africa. This finding underscores the importance of surveillance to rapidly detect and control African outbreaks before exportation can occur. Significantly higher rates of nucleotide substitution appear to occur during urban than during enzootic transmission. These results suggest fundamental differences in transmission modes and/or dynamics in these two transmission cycles.Chikungunya virus (CHIKV; Togaviridae: Alphavirus) is an arbovirus (arthropod-borne virus) vectored by Aedes mosquitoes to humans in tropical and subtropical regions of Africa and Asia (Fig. ​(Fig.1;1; reviewed in references 26 and 46). CHIKV has a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome of ∼12 kb and causes chikungunya fever (CHIK), a febrile illness associated with severe arthralgia and rash (2, 15, 31, 35); the name is derived from a Bantu language word describing the severe arthritic signs (32), which can persist for years. Thus, CHIK has enormous economic costs in addition to its public health impact (9). Because the signs and symptoms of CHIK overlap with those of dengue and because CHIKV is transmitted sympatrically in urban areas by the same mosquito vectors, it is grossly underreported in the absence of laboratory diagnostics (10, 37).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Distribution of the CHIKV strains used in this study. The map, based on a world map template from http://www.presentationmagazine.com, was edited with permission.CHIKV was first isolated during a 1953 outbreak in present-day Tanzania by Ross (48, 49). Since then, outbreaks have been documented in Africa and Asia, including the Indian subcontinent (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (1, 4). In 2005, CHIKV emerged from East Africa to cause an explosive urban epidemic in popular tourist island destinations in the Indian Ocean (Fig. ​(Fig.1;1; reviewed in reference 31). In late 2005, CHIKV spread into the Indian subcontinent, where millions of people have been affected (5). However, the geographic source of spread into India, from the mainland of Africa or from the Indian Ocean Islands, has not been delineated. India had seen large epidemics of CHIK in the past (reviewed in reference 30), but CHIKV apparently disappeared during the 1970s (5). Since 2006, CHIKV has been imported into Europe and the western hemisphere (including the United States) via many viremic travelers, and an epidemic was initiated in Italy by a traveler from India (4, 11, 47). The dramatic spread since 1980 of dengue viruses (DENV) throughout tropical America, via the same vectors, portends the severity of the public health problem if CHIKV becomes established in the western hemisphere.The first phylogenetic analysis of CHIKV (45) identified three geographically associated genotypes: the West African (WAf), East/Central/South African (ECSA), and Asian genotypes. More recent analyses indicate that the recent Indian Ocean and Indian strains form a monophyletic group within the ECSA lineage (5, 12, 14, 27, 40, 51, 52). However, most CHIKV phylogenetic studies (1, 14, 28, 29, 38, 40, 41, 47, 52) have utilized only partial sequences from the envelope glycoprotein E1 gene, preventing a robust assessment of some of the relationships among strains and of their evolutionary dynamics.The CHIKV strains represented in different geographic lineages apparently circulate in different ecological cycles. In Asia, CHIKV appears to circulate primarily in an urban transmission cycle involving the peridomestic mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and A. albopictus, as well as humans (25, 45). Asian epidemics typically infect thousands-to-millions of people over the course of several years (46). In contrast, African CHIKV circulates primarily in a sylvatic/enzootic cycle, transmitted by arboreal primatophilic Aedes mosquitoes (e.g., A. furcifer and A. africanus) and probably relies on nonhuman primates as reservoir hosts (reviewed in reference 16). Epidemics in rural Africa usually occur on a much smaller scale than in Asia, likely a result of the lower human population densities, and possibly more stable herd immunity. Although the assignments of “urban” and “sylvatic/enzootic” are based on the most common mode of transmission, CHIKV strains of African origin are capable of urban transmission by A. aegypti and A. albopictus, as evidenced by outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (41), Nigeria (36), Kenya (27), and Gabon (42). The ecological differences between the sylvatic/enzootic (henceforth called enzootic) and urban/endemic/epidemic transmission cycles (henceforth called epidemic) such as seasonality of vector larval habitats, vertebrate host abundance and herd immunity, and vector host preferences, prompted us to hypothesize that the evolutionary dynamics of CHIKV may differ between the two transmission cycles. To test this hypothesis, to provide more robust estimates of the evolutionary relationships among the CHIKV strains including the sources of the recent epidemics, and to elucidate the temporal and spatial history of CHIKV evolution, we performed an extensive, genome-scale phylogenetic analysis, utilizing complete open reading frame (ORF) sequences of a large collection of 80 isolates with broad temporal, spatial, and host coverage.