Mutualistic Biofilm Communities Develop with Porphyromonas gingivalis and Initial,Early, and Late Colonizers of Enamel

Porphyromonas gingivalis is present in dental plaque as early as 4 h after tooth cleaning, but it is also associated with periodontal disease, a late-developing event in the microbial successions that characterize daily plaque development. We report here that P. gingivalis ATCC 33277 is remarkable in its ability to interact with a variety of initial, early, middle, and late colonizers growing solely on saliva. Integration of P. gingivalis into multispecies communities was investigated by using two in vitro biofilm models. In flow cells, bacterial growth was quantified using fluorescently conjugated antibodies against each species, and static biofilm growth on saliva-submerged polystyrene pegs was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR using species-specific primers. P. gingivalis could not grow as a single species or together with initial colonizer Streptococcus oralis but showed mutualistic growth when paired with two other initial colonizers, Streptococcus gordonii and Actinomyces oris, as well as with Veillonella sp. (early colonizer), Fusobacterium nucleatum (middle colonizer), and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (late colonizer). In three-species flow cells, P. gingivalis grew with Veillonella sp. and A. actinomycetemcomitans but not with S. oralis and A. actinomycetemcomitans. Also, it grew with Veillonella sp. and F. nucleatum but not with S. oralis and F. nucleatum, indicating that P. gingivalis and S. oralis are not compatible. However, P. gingivalis grew in combination with S. gordonii and S. oralis, demonstrating its ability to overcome the incompatibility when cultured with a second initially colonizing species. Collectively, these data help explain the observed presence of P. gingivalis at all stages of dental plaque development.Removal of dental plaque by routine oral hygiene procedures is followed by a repetition of a species succession that starts with initially colonizing streptococci and actinomyces (5, 16). Other species follow as early, middle, and late colonizers, which establishes the following developmental process: successive attachment of saliva-suspended species to already attached bacteria and formation of multispecies communities.Attachment is a critical event essential to preventing the bacteria from being swallowed by salivary flow. Initial colonizers bind to host-derived receptors in the salivary pellicle coating of the tooth enamel. The remainder of typical plaque development occurs by accretion of saliva-suspended species and growth of attached bacteria, thereby increasing the microbial diversity. Adherence of suspended single cells to attached cells is called coadhesion (1). Some suspended cells are already coaggregated and adhere to attached cells as coaggregates; coaggregation is defined as the specific cell-to-cell recognition and adherence of genetically distinct cell types (8). All human oral bacterial species exhibit coaggregation. For example, Streptococcus oralis coaggregates with Streptococcus gordonii (intrageneric coaggregation). Both species pair with Actinomyces oris (intergeneric coaggregation), and all of them coaggregate with Fusobacterium nucleatum (multigeneric coaggregation). Multispecies communities composed of coaggregating species characterize dental plaque biofilms in vivo (3, 17, 18).To increase our understanding of interactions among species, we have employed two in vitro model systems and are testing numerous combinations of seven species for their ability to grow on saliva as their sole nutritional source (20, 21). First, we reported that F. nucleatum (middle colonizer) failed to grow when paired with S. oralis but grew well when A. oris was included in the three-species biofilm (20), indicating specificity by F. nucleatum for the presence of a particular initial colonizer. Recently, we showed that Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (late colonizer and periodontopathogen) exhibited mutualistic relationships with F. nucleatum and Veillonella sp. (early colonizer and commensal organism), illustrating the ability of commensals and pathogens to grow together (21).Porphyromonas gingivalis, another periodontopathogen, forms three-species communities with F. nucleatum and S. gordonii (11). Proteomics of P. gingivalis in this three-species community revealed a broad increase in proteins involved in protein synthesis, suggesting that a multispecies relationship is advantageous for the porphyromonad (11). This research group had previously reported the presence of differentially regulated porphyromonad genes when P. gingivalis and S. gordonii were together in biofilms (22). Thus, P. gingivalis responds to the presence of other oral species.P. gingivalis is detected in dental plaque samples within 6 h after professional tooth cleaning (5, 13), and its numbers increase in periodontally diseased sites (15). It forms biofilms with S. gordonii but not with Streptococcus mutans (12) or Streptococcus cristatus (23). P. gingivalis required a preformed streptococcal substratum for its incorporation into a biofilm (12). Partner specificity was also noted among four fresh isolates of P. gingivalis, which showed no coaggregation with a variety of oral actinomyces, aggregatibacteria, capnocytophagae, and streptococci (9) but coaggregated with F. nucleatum (7, 10). We show here that P. gingivalis exhibits widespread mutualism with initial, early, middle, and late colonizers but also shows specificity with initially colonizing streptococci, which could help explain its early appearance in the development of dental plaque biofilms. The relationship of porphyromonads with initial, early, middle, and later colonizers during biofilm growth on saliva as a sole nutritional source has not been explored previously. We hypothesize that the ability of P. gingivalis to coaggregate with S. gordonii and A. oris (initial colonizers), Veillonella sp. (early colonizer), F. nucleatum (middle colonizer), and A. actinomycetemcomitans (late colonizer) allows these bacteria to form multispecies biofilm communities.     

Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC 10953 Requires Actinomyces naeslundii ATCC 43146 for Growth on Saliva in a Three-Species Community That Includes Streptococcus oralis 34

Formation of dental plaque is a developmental process involving initial and late colonizing species that form polymicrobial communities. Fusobacteria are the most numerous gram-negative bacteria in dental plaque, but they become prevalent after the initial commensal colonizers, such as streptococci and actinomyces, have established communities. The unusual ability of these bacteria to coaggregate with commensals, as well as pathogenic late colonizers, has been proposed to facilitate colonization by the latter organisms. We investigated the integration of Fusobacterium nucleatum into multispecies communities by employing two in vitro models with saliva as the sole nutritional source. In flow cell biofilms, numbers of cells were quantified using fluorescently conjugated antibodies against each species, and static biofilms were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (q-PCR) using species-specific primers. Unable to grow as single-species biofilms, F. nucleatum grew in two-species biofilms with Actinomyces naeslundii but not with Streptococcus oralis. However, enhanced growth of fusobacteria was observed in three-species biofilms, indicating that there was multispecies cooperation. Importantly, these community dynamics yielded an 18-fold increase in the F. nucleatum biomass between 4 h and 18 h in the flow cell inoculated with three species. q-PCR analysis of static biofilms revealed that maximum growth of the three species occurred at 24 h to 36 h. Lower numbers of cells were observed at 48 h, suggesting that saliva could not support higher cell densities as the sole nutrient. Integration of F. nucleatum into multispecies commensal communities was evident from the interdigitation of fusobacteria in coaggregates with A. naeslundii and S. oralis and from the improved growth of fusobacteria, which was dependent on the presence of A. naeslundii.The human mouth contains microbiologically diverse communities. While collectively humans harbor more than 700 bacterial phylotypes, each individual is estimated to have fewer than 100 such phylotypes (1), and approximately 50% of human oral bacteria have yet to be cultivated. Although biofilm communities on tooth enamel are polymicrobial (3, 20), more than 60 to 90% of the bacteria found in initial plaque on saliva-coated tooth enamel are streptococci (6, 19). Other bacterial genera that are among the initial commensal colonizers include Actinomyces, Veillonella, and Neisseria (6, 16, 19), and these organisms contribute to the polymicrobial nature of initial plaque.The structure of a community is dependent upon the nature of the foundation. An integral feature of an oral bacterial biofilm foundation is the ability to coaggregate, which is defined as cell-cell recognition and binding between genetically distinct bacteria. After routine oral hygiene treatment, freshly cleaned tooth enamel is quickly coated with a salivary pellicle, which provides a set of receptor molecules recognized by primary colonizing bacteria, such as streptococci and actinomyces. Besides recognizing salivary receptors, these bacteria coaggregate and provide a foundation for the subsequent attachment and growth of other bacteria, such as veillonellae, that form close metabolic relationships with streptococci (12, 15). As initial colonizers develop into biofilm communities with anaerobic microenvironments, incorporation of the obligate anaerobic fusobacteria into these communities becomes possible. Fusobacteria as a group coaggregate with all other oral bacteria and have been suggested, therefore, to be a crucial link between primary colonizing species and later colonizing pathogens (13, 14). Thus, a foundation consisting of coaggregating streptococci, actinomyces, and veillonellae populates the tooth surface, and these organisms are recognized by fusobacteria, which colonize and become the dominant gram-negative bacterial species. The new foundation is a substratum containing fusobacterial surface receptors available for recognition by late colonizing pathogens. Supporting the crucial link is clinical evidence that fusobacteria appear in dental plaque after commensal species and before the pathogenic “red” complex consisting of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia (22, 23).Coaggregation partnerships are highly specific. A significant role for coaggregation in the formation of dental plaque biofilms and particularly in accretion of secondary colonizers to the pioneer species in plaque has been proposed (14) and has been demonstrated for the development of a spatially organized community (20). However, coaggregation may also provide some metabolic advantages (e.g., cross feeding and enzyme complementation) to neighboring cells by facilitating physical juxtaposition of partner cells, as has been shown for glucose metabolism of coaggregates of actinomyces and streptococci (7, 8). One aim of the present study was to examine the structures of two- and three-species communities composed of Actinomyces naeslundii, Streptococcus oralis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum in model biofilm systems. The first two species are initial colonizers and are considered commensals, whereas fusobacteria are secondary colonizers and are postulated to be a coaggregation bridge between initial and late colonizers (14). Our second aim was to investigate the integration and growth of fusobacteria in polymicrobial communities.A variety of experimental methods have been developed to study the formation of biofilms. Model systems often rely on the flow of nutrients over a surface on which bacteria are able to attach and grow. In the present study we used two distinct in vitro models, a saliva-fed flow cell and a polystyrene peg immersed in static saliva. Biofilm communities form naturally and are undisturbed (3, 20, 21). The spatial organization of a multispecies community resulting from colonization and growth is preserved and can be examined noninvasively by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). In the static system, the amount of each species in multispecies biofilms formed on polystyrene pegs can be measured by real-time quantitative PCR (q-PCR). We show here with both models that fusobacteria are unable to grow as single species, but they integrate into commensal streptococcus-actinomyces communities and grow. Integration and growth are required for fusobacteria to become crucial links between commensal communities and later colonizing pathogenic communities. In the three-species community studied here, A. naeslundii is required for F. nucleatum to integrate and grow.     

Coaggregation by the Freshwater Bacterium Sphingomonas natatoria Alters Dual-Species Biofilm Formation

Coaggregation is hypothesized to enhance freshwater biofilm development. To investigate this hypothesis, the ability of the coaggregating bacterium Sphingomonas natatoria to form single- and dual-species biofilms was studied and compared to that of a naturally occurring spontaneous coaggregation-deficient variant. Attachment assays using metabolically inactive cells were performed using epifluorescence and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Under static and flowing conditions, coaggregating S. natatoria 2.1gfp cells adhered to glass surfaces to form diaphanous single-species biofilms. When glass surfaces were precoated with coaggregation partner Micrococcus luteus 2.13 cells, S. natatoria 2.1gfp cells formed densely packed dual-species biofilms. The addition of 80 mM galactosamine, which reverses coaggregation, mildly reduced adhesion to glass but inhibited the interaction and attachment to glass-surface-attached M. luteus 2.13 cells. As opposed to wild-type coaggregating cells, coaggregation-deficient S. natatoria 2.1COGgfp variant cells were retarded in colonizing glass and did not interact with glass-surface-attached M. luteus 2.13 cells. To determine if coaggregation enhances biofilm growth and expansion, viable coaggregating S. natatoria 2.1gfp cells or the coaggregation-deficient variant S. natatoria 2.1COGgfp cells were coinoculated in flow cells with viable M. luteus 2.13 cells and allowed to grow together for 96 h. Coaggregating S. natatoria 2.1gfp cells outcompeted M. luteus 2.13 cells, and 96-h biofilms were composed predominantly of S. natatoria 2.1gfp cells. Conversely, when coaggregation-deficient S. natatoria 2.1COGgfp cells were coinoculated with M. luteus 2.13 cells, the 96-h biofilm contained few coaggregation-deficient S. natatoria 2.1 cells. Thus, coaggregation promotes biofilm integration by facilitating attachment to partner species and likely contributes to the expansion of coaggregating S. natatoria 2.1 populations in dual-species biofilms through competitive interactions.In nature, most biofilms are not composed of one bacterial species but instead contain multiple species (24). These multispecies communities can be responsible for the fouling of ships (9, 44), the corrosion of liquid-carrying vessels (3, 14), and chronic infections in higher organisms (41, 42, 57). Recent research has demonstrated that in order for multispecies biofilm communities to develop, interbacterial communication is often essential (62) and facilitates the coordination of bacterial activities to promote the formation and to maintain the integrity of multispecies biofilm communities (28, 32, 60). Interspecies communication can be mediated by chemical or physical means. Mechanisms for chemical communication between different species include the secretion and uptake of metabolic by-products (11, 19), the exchange of genetic material (40), and the production and recognition of interspecies signal molecules such as short peptides (36) and autoinducer-2 (10). Mechanisms for interspecies physical communication can involve cell surface structures such as flagella or fimbriae (31, 48) and also include nonspecific adhesion between bacterial species (5) as well as highly specific coaggregations mediated by lectin-saccharide interactions (48).Coaggregation, the highly specific recognition and adhesion of different bacterial species to one another, was first discovered to occur between human oral bacteria in 1970 (23). Since then, research has shown that coaggregation occurs between specific bacterial species in environments other than the human oral cavity (48). Coaggregation interactions have been detected between bacteria isolated from canine dental plaque (21), the crop of chickens (61), the human female urogenital tract (30), the human intestine (34), and wastewater and freshwater biofilms (27, 37, 53). In particular, Buswell et al. (8) first demonstrated that coaggregation occurred between 19 freshwater strains that were isolated from a drinking water biofilm. Further studies by Rickard et al. demonstrated that coaggregation between these 19 strains was mediated by growth-phase-dependent lectin-saccharide interactions (49, 50) and occurred at the interspecies and intraspecies levels for nine different genera (50). From this aquatic biofilm consortium, coaggregation between the gram-negative bacterium Sphingomonas (Blastomonas) natatoria 2.1 and the gram-positive bacterium Micrococcus luteus 2.13 have been studied further. Coaggregation between this pair is mediated by the growth-phase-dependent expression of a lectin-like adhesin(s) on S. natatoria 2.1 and a complementary polysaccharide-containing receptor(s) on the cell surface of M. luteus 2.13 (47, 49). The addition of millimolar concentrations of galactosamine resulted in the dispersion of the coaggregates (47, 49). Coaggregation between this pair also occurs after growth in artificial biofilm constructs composed of poloxamer (47). These findings suggested that coaggregation may contribute to the integration of S. natatoria 2.1 into freshwater biofilms through specific adhesive interactions with M. luteus 2.13. Indeed, while coaggregation is hypothesized to contribute to the integration of species into freshwater biofilms (31, 32, 48), no direct evidence has yet been presented. If coaggregation promotes the integration of species into a freshwater biofilm, it may contribute to the retention of pathogens in drinking water pipelines (7) as well as the maintenance of the species diversity of aquatic biofilms that are exposed to shear stress (52, 53).S. natatoria and M. luteus are commonly isolated from moist environments. M. luteus is environmentally ubiquitous and is found in biofilms of aquatic ecosystems (8, 35), in soil (54), and on human and animal skin (17, 29). Cells of M. luteus are gram positive, coccus shaped, arranged in clusters of tetrads, and nonmotile. S. natatoria is indigenous to freshwater environments (55) and has been isolated from swimming pools, deep-ice boreholes, and drinking water systems (1, 50, 56). Cells are gram negative, are rod shaped, and have the propensity to form rosettes containing 4 to 14 cells (55). Each rosette-forming cell has a polar tuft of fimbriae at its nonreproductive pole by which it attaches to other S. natatoria cells and, possibly, solid surfaces (46, 55). Reproduction occurs by asymmetric division (budding) to produce an ovoid daughter cell, which is highly motile, with a single polar flagellum. These ovoid daughter cells do not coaggregate, and only mature cells within rosettes can attach to other species of bacteria. Previous studies indicated that while coaggregation between S. natatoria 2.1 and M. luteus 2.13 is inhibited by the addition of galactosamine, the propensity of S. natatoria 2.1 to form rosettes was unaffected (46, 49).The aim of this work was to determine if coaggregation enhances the attachment of planktonic S. natatoria 2.1 cells to clean glass surfaces as well as glass surfaces precoated with M. luteus 2.13 cells under static and flowing conditions. This study also aimed to provide insight into whether coaggregation contributes to the expansion of S. natatoria 2.1 populations within dual-species biofilms containing M. luteus 2.13. Epifluorescence microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) coupled with three different computer-based analysis programs were used throughout this study. Attachment assays were performed using metabolically inactive planktonic coaggregating or coaggregation-deficient variants of S. natatoria 2.1 that were suspended over or that were flowed across metabolically inactive glass-surface-attached M. luteus 2.13 cells. The potential role of coaggregation in promoting the expansion of S. natatoria 2.1 populations within biofilms containing M. luteus 2.13 was investigated by inoculating flow cells with viable cells and monitoring spatiotemporal development. By achieving these two aims, this work demonstrates that coaggregation contributes to biofilm integration and indicates that there is a possible role for coaggregation interactions in the establishment and expansion of S. natatoria populations in freshwater biofilms.     

Isolation of a Novel Bacteriophage Specific for the Periodontal Pathogen Fusobacterium nucleatum

Fusobacterium nucleatum is a periodontal pathogen that has been directly associated with the development and progression of periodontal disease, a widespread pathology that affects the support tissues of the tooth. We isolated a new bacteriophage (FnpΦ02) that specifically infects this bacterium. Transmission electron microscopy showed that the virion is composed of an icosahedral head and a segmented tail. The size of the phage genome was estimated to be approximately 59 kbp of double-stranded DNA. The morphological features and the genetic characteristics suggest that FnpΦ02 is part of the Siphoviridae family. Using one-step growth and adsorption experiments, the latent period, burst size, and adsorption rate were estimated to be 15 h, 100 infectious units per cell, and 7.5 × 10⁻¹⁰ ml min⁻¹, respectively. A small fragment of phage DNA was cloned and sequenced, showing 93% nucleotide identity with the phage PA6 of Propionibacterium acnes and amino acid identity with fragments of two proteins (Gp3 and Gp4) of this phage. To our knowledge, FnpΦ02 is the first phage described to infect Fusobacterium nucleatum and provides the base for future exploration of phages in the control of periodontal disease.The term “periodontal disease” refers to a wide set of pathological alterations of the periodontal tissue. The most common clinical manifestations are known as gingivitis and periodontitis, and both are widely distributed around the world (18). Periodontitis is a multifactorial inflammatory-based infection of the supporting tissues of the tooth. It is essentially characterized by the progressive destruction of the periodontal ligament and the alveolar bone, leading to the loss of the affected tooth (2). Periodontitis is caused by bacteria or bacterial groups embedded in a biofilm or dental plaque that protects them against antimicrobial agents (18). The bacterial species involved in periodontal disease are predominantly Gram-negative anaerobes, and although they are usually isolated from affected patients, they are also isolated from healthy individuals, but in a lesser proportion and frequency (26).Fusobacterium nucleatum is an anaerobic, Gram-negative, long bacillus and a member of the microflora in the oral cavity. F. nucleatum is considered a periodontal pathogen because it is frequently isolated from lesions, produces a high number of tissue irritants, and has the ability to form coaggregates with other periodontal pathogens, acting as a bridge between early and late colonizers in the surface of the enamel (4, 11). Three different subspecies of F. nucleatum have been related to the pathology of periodontal disease, F. nucleatum subsp. nucleatum, subsp. polymorphum, and subsp. vincentii, all of which have been associated with lesions of periodontitis but also have been isolated in high numbers from successfully treated patients (9).Bacteriophages are viruses that can infect and kill only bacteria and have been used for many years as powerful tools for the study of bacterial genetics and, given their specificity, used in the identification and characterization of microorganisms (phage typing). Nevertheless, phages were originally described as therapeutic elements to treat human and animal infections (34). This application, known as phage therapy, has regained interest in the past years, particularly in an era when antibiotic resistance and biofilm-based infections are permanent issues (25). Bacteriophages are denominated “temperate” when their genetic material is integrated within the bacterial genome with no immediate lysis of the bacterium until, under certain conditions, the expression of the viral genome is induced and the production of new virus particles lyses the host cell; they are called “lytic” or “virulent” when, immediately after the infection, they redirect the bacterial metabolism to the production of new phages, which are released during the bacterial lysis (22, 36). There are many examples of the use of bacteriophages at a clinical (14, 32) and commercial level (20). Specifically in the dentistry area, several bacteriophages that infect diverse oral bacteria have been isolated from saliva and dental plaque (12, 13, 23, 37).Although F. nucleatum is an important periodontal pathogen, reports of bacteriophages for this microorganism do not exist. In this work, we isolated and characterized a new bacteriophage for F. nucleatum from a saliva sample, designated FnpΦ02, and to our knowledge this is the first bacteriophage for this bacterium.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Inactivation of Vibrio anguillarum by Attached and Planktonic Roseobacter Cells

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the inhibition of Vibrio by Roseobacter in a combined liquid-surface system. Exposure of Vibrio anguillarum to surface-attached roseobacters (10⁷ CFU/cm²) resulted in significant reduction or complete killing of the pathogen inoculated at 10² to 10⁴ CFU/ml. The effect was likely associated with the production of tropodithietic acid (TDA), as a TDA-negative mutant did not affect survival or growth of V. anguillarum.Antagonistic interactions among marine bacteria are well documented, and secretion of antagonistic compounds is common among bacteria that colonize particles or surfaces (8, 13, 16, 21, 31). These marine bacteria may be interesting as sources for new antimicrobial drugs or as probiotic bacteria for aquaculture.Aquaculture is a rapidly growing sector, but outbreaks of bacterial diseases are a limiting factor and pose a threat, especially to young fish and invertebrates that cannot be vaccinated. Because regular or prophylactic administration of antibiotics must be avoided, probiotic bacteria are considered an alternative (9, 18, 34, 38, 39, 40). Several microorganisms have been able to reduce bacterial diseases in challenge trials with fish or fish larvae (14, 24, 25, 27, 33, 37, 39, 40). One example is Phaeobacter strain 27-4 (17), which inhibits Vibrio anguillarum and reduces mortality in turbot larvae (27). The antagonism of Phaeobacter 27-4 and the closely related Phaeobacter inhibens is due mainly to the sulfur-containing tropolone derivative tropodithietic acid (TDA) (2, 5), which is also produced by other Phaeobacter strains and Ruegeria mobilis (28). Phaeobacter and Ruegeria strains or their DNA has been commonly found in marine larva-rearing sites (6, 17, 28).Phaeobacter and Ruegeria (Alphaproteobacteria, Roseobacter clade) are efficient surface colonizers (7, 11, 31, 36). They are abundant in coastal and eutrophic zones and are often associated with algae (3, 7, 41). Surface-attached Phaeobacter bacteria may play an important role in determining the species composition of an emerging biofilm, as even low densities of attached Phaeobacter strain SK2.10 bacteria can prevent other marine organisms from colonizing solid surfaces (30, 32).In continuation of the previous research on roseobacters as aquaculture probiotics, the purpose of this study was to determine the antagonistic potential of Phaeobacter and Ruegeria against Vibrio anguillarum in liquid systems that mimic a larva-rearing environment. Since production of TDA in liquid marine broth appears to be highest when roseobacters form an air-liquid biofilm (5), we addressed whether they could be applied as biofilms on solid surfaces.     

Central Role of the Early Colonizer Veillonella sp. in Establishing Multispecies Biofilm Communities with Initial,Middle, and Late Colonizers of Enamel

Human dental biofilm communities comprise several species, which can interact cooperatively or competitively. Bacterial interactions influence biofilm formation, metabolic changes, and physiological function of the community. Lactic acid, a common metabolite of oral bacteria, was measured in the flow cell effluent of one-, two- and three-species communities growing on saliva as the sole nutritional source. We investigated single-species and multispecies colonization by using known initial, early, middle, and late colonizers of enamel. Fluorescent-antibody staining and image analysis were used to quantify the biomass in saliva-fed flow cells. Of six species tested, only the initial colonizer Actinomyces oris exhibited significant growth. The initial colonizer Streptococcus oralis produced lactic acid but showed no significant growth. The early colonizer Veillonella sp. utilized lactic acid in two- and three-species biofilm communities. The biovolumes of all two-species biofilms increased when Veillonella sp. was present as one of the partners, indicating that this early colonizer promotes mutualistic community development. All three-species combinations exhibited enhanced growth except one, i.e., A. oris, Veillonella sp., and the middle colonizer Porphyromonas gingivalis, indicating specificity among three-species communities. Further specificity was seen when Fusobacterium nucleatum (a middle colonizer), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (a late colonizer), and P. gingivalis did not grow with S. oralis in two-species biofilms, but inclusion of Veillonella sp. resulted in growth of all three-species combinations. We propose that commensal veillonellae use lactic acid for growth in saliva and that they communicate metabolically with initial, early, middle, and late colonizers to establish multispecies communities on enamel.The human oral cavity contains a widely diverse community of resident bacteria composed of several hundred species (1, 18). They organize into multispecies communities through a recurrent sequence of colonization that occurs after each oral hygiene treatment; for example, dental plaque development on enamel starts with the initial colonizers streptococci and actinomyces (7, 15), which are followed by early-colonizing veillonellae (7, 11, 14), middle-colonizing porphyromonads (7) and fusobacteria (7, 10, 11), and late-colonizing aggregatibacters (9).During the initial stage of biofilm formation, streptococci and actinomyces bind to host-derived receptors in the salivary pellicle coating of enamel. In turn, other species bind to already-adherent cells, a process called coadhesion (2). This process and coaggregation (10), defined as specific cell-to-cell recognition between genetically distinct cells, as well as growth of adherent cells contribute to dental plaque development. While it is known that pure cultures of oral bacteria metabolize dietary sugars to lactic acid, little is known about the importance of lactic acid to community growth on saliva as a sole nutrient source. Most pure cultures and many combinations of species are unable to grow on whole saliva, which is a complex nutritional source. Growth might, in fact, require spatial organization and mutualistic interactions among selected species that collectively possess a combination of metabolic properties that are capable of converting latent nutrition into usable nutrition. In succession, groups of other selected species with other combined metabolic capabilities can further process this complex nutritional source, with a resultant assembling and disassembling of constantly changing oral biofilm communities.Streptococci make up 60 to 90% of the supragingival plaque biomass in the first 24 h of colonization (12, 15). They catabolize carbohydrates to short-chain organic acids, such as lactic acid and pyruvic acid (4). Veillonellae constitute as much as 5% of the initial plaque biomass but are unable to catabolize sugars. They rely on the fermentation of organic acids such as lactic acid (6) and thus set up a convenient metabolic food chain in dental plaque.In vivo studies using gnotobiotic rats demonstrated that veillonellae were unable to establish monoinfections. Yet when a strain of Veillonella was inoculated into rats already monoinfected with a strain of Streptococcus mutans that coaggregates with that Veillonella strain, the number of veillonellae on the teeth of the coinfected animals was 1,000-fold higher than the number when a noncoaggregating Veillonella strain was used (13). Also, in gnotobiotic rats, lower caries and plaque scores were obtained for two-species biofilms than for single-species colonization by streptococci, and inclusion of veillonellae reduced caries activity and demineralization of the enamel by streptococci (13). Streptococcus-Veillonella communities containing coaggregation partners were micromanipulated from 8-h human dental plaque, providing additional evidence of the close association of these two species in vivo (3). Further, Veillonella spp. are juxtaposed with coaggregation receptor polysaccharide-bearing streptococci in early communities in vivo, and a rapid succession of veillonella phylotypes occurs in these communities (16). These reports offer broad-based evidence that veillonellae and streptococci are linked in oral biofilms.The focus of the current investigation was to explore Veillonella-based mixed-species communities in saliva-fed flow cells. The concentration of lactic acid in the effluent of flow cells containing biofilm communities was determined. We hypothesize that spatiotemporal metabolic interactions and coaggregation of Veillonella sp. with Streptococcus oralis and early, middle, and late colonizers allow these organisms to form three-species biofilm communities. We show high specificity of community partnerships among the six species examined, suggesting that successions of species in naturally recurring dental plaque in vivo are centered on metabolic and physical interactions of the community participants which support the nonrandom sequential appearance of species in the development of oral biofilms.     

Probing the Spatial Organization of Measles Virus Fusion Complexes

The spatial organization of metastable paramyxovirus fusion (F) and attachment glycoprotein hetero-oligomers is largely unknown. To further elucidate the organization of functional fusion complexes of measles virus (MeV), an archetype of the paramyxovirus family, we subjected central predictions of alternative docking models to experimental testing using three distinct approaches. Carbohydrate shielding through engineered N-glycans indicates close proximity of a membrane-distal, but not membrane-proximal, section of the MeV attachment (H) protein stalk domain to F. Directed mutagenesis of this section identified residues 111, 114, and 118 as modulators of avidity of glycoprotein interactions and determinants of F triggering. Stalk-length variation through deletion or insertion of HR elements at positions flanking this section demonstrates that the location of the stalk segment containing these residues cannot be altered in functional fusion complexes. In contrast, increasing the distance between the H head domains harboring the receptor binding sites and this section through insertion of structurally rigid α-helical domains with a pitch of up to approximately 75 Å downstream of stalk position 118 partially maintains functionality in transient expression assays and supports efficient growth of recombinant virions. In aggregate, these findings argue against specific protein-protein contacts between the H head and F head domains but instead support a docking model that is characterized by short-range contacts between the prefusion F head and the attachment protein stalk, possibly involving H residues 111, 114, and 118, and extension of the head domain of the attachment protein above prefusion F.Paramyxoviruses infect cells through fusion of the viral envelope with target cell membranes. For all members of the Paramyxovirinae subfamily, this involves the concerted action of two envelope glycoproteins, the fusion (F) and attachment (H, HN, or G, depending on the Paramyxovirinae genus) proteins. Both proteins feature short lumenal tails, a single transmembrane domain, and large ectodomains. The F protein, in type I orientation, forms homotrimers, while homodimers or homotetramers have been suggested as functional units for attachment proteins of different Paramyxovirinae subfamily members (7, 14, 28, 41, 49, 50, 66). For entry, upon receptor binding, the attachment protein is considered to initiate a series of conformational rearrangements in the metastable prefusion F protein (15, 77), which ultimately brings together transmembrane domains and fusion peptides and, thus, donor and target membranes (3, 32, 45, 53, 80).Multiple studies have demonstrated that specific interactions between compatible F and attachment proteins of paramyxovirinae are imperative for the formation of functional fusion complexes (6, 29, 36, 42, 43, 56, 75). However, the molecular nature of these interactions and the spatial organization of functional glycoprotein hetero-oligomers remain largely unknown. Individual ectodomain and partial ectodomain crystal structures have been obtained for different paramyxovirus F (13, 76, 77) and attachment (8, 14, 17, 28, 35, 79) proteins, respectively. For F, a stabilized human parainfluenza virus type 5 (HPIV5) ectodomain that is believed to represent a prefusion conformation folds into a globular head structure that is attached to the transmembrane domains through a helical stalk consisting of the membrane-proximal heptad repeat B (HR-B) domains (77). For the attachment protein, a globular head that harbors the receptor binding sites is considered to be connected to the transmembrane region through extended stalk domains (34, 78). Crystal structures of isolated head domains have been solved for several paramyxovirus attachment proteins, including measles virus (MeV) H, and reveal the six-blade propeller fold typical of sialidase structures (8, 14, 17, 28, 79). However, morbilliviruses recognize proteinaceous receptors (for MeV, the regulator of complement activation [CD46] and/or signaling lymphocytic activation molecule [SLAM], depending on the virus strain) (21, 40, 46, 51, 64, 65). X-ray data do not extend to the stalk domains, but circular dichroism analysis (78) and structure predictions (36, 78) support an α-helical coiled-coil configuration of the stalk.The nature of individual residues that engage in specific intermolecular interactions between glycoproteins of paramyxovirinae prior to refolding has been studied most extensively for the attachment protein. The stalk domains of several paramyxovirus HN proteins have been implicated in mediating specificity for their homotypic F proteins (18, 20, 43, 63, 70, 72). We have found that this extends to MeV and canine distemper virus H and, thus, to paramyxovirinae recognizing proteinaceous receptors (36), supporting the general hypothesis that F-interacting residues may reside in the stalk region of the attachment protein (30, 78).Considerably less information concerning the nature of F microdomains that mediate attachment protein specificity is available. Among the few exceptions are peptides derived from Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and Sendai virus F HR-B domains, which interact with soluble variants of the respective HN proteins in vitro (25, 67). Multiple domains have been suggested to mediate specificity of HPIV2 F for its HN (69). However, a conclusive N-glycan shielding study (43) and structural information (77, 78) argue against direct contacts between NDV F HR-B domains and HN in native glycoprotein complexes. Thus, the role of individual HPIV2 F residues in HN binding is unclear (25, 43).Building on the observation that MeV H is able to engage in productive heterotypic interactions with F proteins derived from some but not all isolates of closely related canine distemper virus, we have recently identified residues in morbillivirus F (MeV F residue 121) and H (H stalk residues 110 to 114) that interdependently contribute to physical MeV glycoprotein interaction and F triggering for fusion (36). While these residues could mediate reciprocal glycoprotein specificity through long-range effects, molecular modeling of the MeV H stalk in an α-helical conformation has posited F residue 121 at the same level above the viral envelope as H residues 110 to 114, making direct contacts structurally conceivable (36). This spatial organization of functional fusion complexes furthermore provides a comprehensive explanation for previous demonstrations of a specific role for attachment protein stalk domains of paramyxovirinae in functional and physical interactions with F (18, 43, 63, 70, 72). However, this “staggered-head” model mandates positioning the globular head of the attachment protein above the prefusion F trimer (36), as opposed to a suggested “parallel-head” alignment of the glycoproteins (31, 47). The latter is mostly based on transmission electron microscopy micrographs of viral particles apparently showing glycoprotein spikes of equal length (33). Unfortunately, these images lack the resolution for an identification of the molecular nature of the spikes (attachment or F protein) or the distinguishing between densely packaged H and F head domains of different heights and laterally aligned head domains. Indeed, a recent single-particle reconstruction based on cryo-electron microscopy images of HPIV5 particles revealed that defined spikes correspond to F in a postfusion conformation, which was interpreted as a product of possible premature F refolding (38). These two-dimensional images of heavy-metal-stained particles did not reveal F spikes in a prefusion conformation. Rather, a dense surface layer was considered to correspond to prefusion glycoprotein hetero-oligomers (38). In addition to further-advanced image reconstructions, biochemical assessment of alternative docking modes is imperative for the elucidation of the organization of functional fusion complexes of paramyxovirinae.In this study, we subjected central predictions of the hypothetical alignment models to experimental analysis. By employing carbohydrate shielding, directed mutagenesis, and variation of the length of the H stalk domain, we examined the proximity of different regions of the H stalk to F, probed a role of individual residues around the previously identified H stalk section from positions 110 to 114 in the formation of functional fusion complexes, tested the effect of varying the length of the H stalk membrane proximal and membrane distal to this section, and explored the general possibility of whether specific contacts between the prefusion F and H head domains are required for F triggering. Experimental data were interpreted in the light of a working model of MeV glycoprotein hetero-oligomers prior to receptor binding.     

Organization of F-Actin via Concerted Regulation of Kette by PTP61F and dAbl

We identify Kette, a key regulator of actin polymerization, as a substrate for Drosophila protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP61F, as well as for dAbl tyrosine kinase. We further show that dAbl is a direct substrate for PTP61F. Therefore, Kette phosphotyrosine levels are regulated both directly and indirectly by PTP61F. Kette and PTP61F genetically interact in the regulation of F-actin organization in pupal eye discs, suggesting that tyrosine phosphorylation is essential for the proper regulation of Kette-mediated actin dynamics. This hypothesis was confirmed by demonstrating the loss of Kette-mediated F-actin organization and lamella formation in S2 cells in a Kette Y482F mutant in which the dAbl phosphorylation site was eliminated. Our results establish for the first time that PTP61F and dAbl ensure proper actin organization through the coordinated and reversible tyrosine phosphorylation of Kette.The actin cytoskeleton is regulated as a function of development, cell motility, intracellular transport, and the cell cycle by the polymerization of G-actin to F-actin (34). Correct regulation of actin cytoskeletal dynamics is essential to numerous differentiating and cellular processes in the nervous system (9) and musculature (42), among others. Actin polymerization is regulated by a number of proteins, among which is human NCK-associated protein 1 (NAP-1 [3, 4, 45]). It and its Drosophila orthologue, Kette (Hem in FlyBase), are critical components in both SCAR/WAVE and WASP complexes, which play essential roles in transducing Rac1 signals to initiate Arp2/3-dependent actin polymerization (6, 25, 40, 48). Murine NAP-1 interacts with NCK, an SH2-SH3 adaptor protein (4), and is essential for proper neuronal differentiation in the cortex (53). Neuronal differentiation and neural tube defects are observed in NAP-1 mutant mice, apparently due to reduced localization of WAVE1 to the cell membrane (53).In Drosophila, loss of kette activity specifically results in the accumulation of cytosolic F-actin (6). Kette protein associates with F-actin in the cytosol, but also at focal contact sites, where it apparently antagonizes SCAR/WAVE function and activates WASP-dependent actin polymerization (6). Despite its role in repressing SCAR/WAVE function, Kette serves to protect the complex from proteosome-mediated degradation and is critical to its intracellular localization (25). At the level of the organism, kette alleles affect axonal growth and pathfinding due to aberrant actin cytoskeleton formation, for example, altering crossing of the embryonic ventral midline by VUM neuron axons, as well as generating aberrant axonal projections in both motor and sensory neurons (21). Like mammalian NAP-1, Drosophila kette also interacts with the fly NCK orthologue, dreadlocks (dock) (21). Other evidence for the conserved interaction of Kette with signaling cascades is provided by the observation that kette mutant phenotypes are partially rescuable by overexpression of the small G protein Rac1 (21). The interaction of kette with dock suggests the possibility of tyrosine phosphorylation in the regulation of Kette activity, but no evidence supporting this hypothesis has been reported.Signaling by tyrosine phosphorylation in various metazoans controls numerous processes involved in cellular differentiation and proliferation. Many of the components regulating tyrosine phosphorylation have been identified and characterized using genetic, biochemical, molecular, and genomic sequence analyses (31). However, in contrast to the very well-characterized regulation of cellular processes by kinase-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation (15, 52), their regulation by dephosphorylation by protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) has generally lagged behind. Although the functions of several receptor PTPs have been clearly defined as playing essential roles in axon guidance in both Drosophila (12, 23, 41, 47, 50) and mammals (44, 49), our understanding of nontransmembrane PTPs (NT-PTPs) is more limited. Only three of the eight putative Drosophila NT-PTPs have been characterized genetically. Corkscrew (Csw) acts as a downstream effector of various receptor protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and is essential for R7 photoreceptor development (35). PTP-enhancer of Ras1 has been characterized as an essential regulator antagonizing signaling mediated by Ras1, possibly through tyrosine dephosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (24, 36). More recently, it has been shown that PTP-meg participates in the establishment and maintenance of axon projections in the Drosophila brain (51). Other than these, the functions of Drosophila NT-PTPs remain largely unknown.PTP61F was originally identified as an NT-PTP that contains one phosphatase domain in the N-terminal region and five proline-rich motifs in the C-terminal tail (29). It is the Drosophila orthologue of mammalian PTP1B and T-cell PTP (TC-PTP) (1), which have been implicated in the regulation of signaling by both insulin (39) and JAK/STAT (33). Two PTP61F isoforms due to alternative splicing possess unique sequences at the C terminus, which determine either internal membrane-association (PTP61Fm) or nuclear localization (PTP61Fn) (29). To date, limited data suggest that PTP61F may participate in the downregulation of JAK/STAT signaling (2, 32), although the underlying mechanism remains unexplored. While PTP61F may recognize the adaptor proteins DOCK (10) and Abi (20) as potential substrates, the signaling pathways involving these interactions have not been clearly defined. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that the regulation of Kette, and hence the localization and polymerization of the actin cytoskeleton, is achieved by reversible tyrosine phosphorylation under the control of both PTP61F and the PTK dAbl.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.