Defective Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific CD8+ T-Cell Polyfunctionality,Proliferation, and Cytotoxicity Are Not Restored by Antiretroviral Therapy

Identifying the functions of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD8⁺ T cells that are not merely modulated by the level of virus but clearly distinguish patients with immune control from those without such control is of paramount importance. Features of the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response in antiretroviral-treated patients (designated Rx <50) and untreated patients (long-term nonprogressors [LTNP]) matched for very low HIV RNA levels were comprehensively examined. The proliferative capacity of HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells was not restored in Rx <50 to the level observed in LTNP, even though HIV-specific CD4⁺ T-cell proliferation in the two patient groups was comparable. This diminished HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell proliferation in Rx <50 was primarily due to a smaller fraction of antigen-specific cells recruited to divide and not to the numbers of divisions that proliferating cells had undergone. Exogenous interleukin-2 (IL-2) induced proliferating cells to divide further but did not rescue the majority of antigen-specific cells with defective proliferation. In addition, differences in HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell proliferation could not be attributed to differences in cellular subsets bearing a memory phenotype, IL-2 production, or PD-1 expression. Although polyfunctionality of HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in Rx <50 was not restored to the levels observed in LTNP despite prolonged suppression of HIV RNA levels, per-cell cytotoxic capacity was the functional feature that most clearly distinguished the cells of LTNP from those of Rx <50. Taken together, these data suggest that there are selective qualitative abnormalities within the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell compartment that persist under conditions of low levels of antigen.Understanding the features of an effective immune response to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is among the most important goals for the design of HIV vaccines and immunotherapies. Most HIV-infected patients develop persistent viremia and CD4⁺ T-cell decline in the absence of antiviral therapy. However, evidence that immunologic control of HIV is possible can be drawn from a small group of rare patients who maintain normal CD4⁺ T-cell counts and restrict HIV replication to below 50 copies/ml plasma for up to 25 years without antiretroviral therapy (ART) (4, 22, 31, 40). Historically, these unique individuals were included within heterogeneous cohorts referred to as long-term survivors or long-term nonprogressors (LTNP), categorized solely based on their disease-free survival exceeding 7 to 10 years and their stable CD4⁺ T-cell counts (21). Over time, it became apparent that only a small subset of individuals within these cohorts had truly nonprogressive infection, maintaining good health with nondeclining CD4⁺ T-cell counts, and these true nonprogressors tended to have HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels below the lower detection limits of the newly available assays (23, 31). Some investigators have adopted other designations more recently, including elite controllers, elite suppressors, or HIV controllers. These designations vary by institution and, in some cases, rely only upon viral load measurements without a requirement for stable CD4⁺ T-cell counts (4, 22, 40). However, for our designation of true LTNP, we employ the inclusion criteria of stable health, nondeclining CD4⁺ T-cell counts, and maintenance of plasma viral RNA levels below 50 copies/ml without ART (29-31).Several lines of evidence strongly suggest that CD8⁺ T cells mediate this control of HIV in LTNP. HLA B*5701 is highly overrepresented in these patients, and in B*5701⁺ patients, the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response is largely focused on peptides restricted by the B57 protein (15, 31). In addition, similar control of simian immunodeficiency virus replication has been described in rhesus macaques carrying the Mamu B*08 or B*17 allele (25, 49). In these macaques, CD8⁺ T-cell depletion studies have strongly suggested that control of viral replication is mediated by CD8⁺ T cells (14). Although these results support the idea that CD8⁺ T cells are responsible for immunologic control, the mechanism remains incompletely understood.Several lines of evidence suggest that immunologic control in LTNP is not simply due to differences in autologous virus recognition by CD8⁺ T cells. The frequencies of CD8⁺ T cells specific for HIV or individual HIV-encoded gene products in the peripheral blood are not different in LTNP and untreated progressors (reviewed in reference 32). Putative “escape” mutations are found in viruses of both HLAB*57⁺ LTNP and HLA-matched progressors (4, 6, 28, 33, 34). In addition, comparable frequencies of CD8⁺ T cells of LTNP and progressors recognize autologous CD4⁺ T cells infected with the autologous virus (12, 28). Similar observations have recently been made in the rhesus macaque model (26). Collectively, these observations strongly suggest that features of the CD8⁺ T-cell response associated with immunologic control are not due to quantitative differences in the numbers of HIV-specific cells or to differential abilities of the autologous virus gene products to be recognized between patient groups.Several qualitative features in the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response have been associated with immunologic control in LTNP. LTNP have been found to have higher frequencies of “polyfunctional” CD8⁺ T cells, named for their ability to degranulate and produce multiple cytokines, including interleukin-2 (IL-2) (2, 5, 51). However, these cells comprise an extremely small proportion of the HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response. In addition, there is considerable overlap between patient groups, and many LTNP have few or no such cells. Compared to those of progressors, HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells of LTNP have a dramatically higher proliferative capacity, a greater ability to upregulate granzyme B (GrB) and perforin production, and a greater cytolytic capacity against autologous HIV-infected CD4⁺ T cells (3, 17, 24, 29, 30). Increased HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell proliferative capacity in LTNP compared to progressors has also been associated with lower PD-1 expression or IL-2 production by HIV-specific CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells (11, 24, 48, 51).Considerable controversy exists over the cause-and-effect relationships between these qualitative differences in the CD8⁺ T-cell response and HIV viremia between patient groups. High levels of antigen can have potent effects on diverse cell types in humans and in animal models. For HIV, lowering the level of viremia through ART has been observed to increase the function of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, NK cells, monocytes, and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (16, 18, 20, 37, 41, 45-47, 50). However, the vast majority of treated progressors will not control HIV replication when ART is interrupted (7, 9, 35), suggesting that many of the qualitative differences in the CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T-cell response between LTNP and untreated progressors are not the cause of control over HIV but rather are likely an effect of viremia. In some but not all studies, ART was sufficient to restore the proliferative capacity, phenotype, and cytokine production by CD4⁺ T cells to levels similar to responses to other viruses or to the HIV-specific response of LTNP (13, 16, 18, 20, 37, 46, 50). Because better IL-2 production or function of HIV-specific CD4⁺ T cells has been associated with increased CD8⁺ T-cell proliferative capacity (24), it has also been suggested that diminished proliferative capacity of progressor CD8⁺ T cells may be an effect of viremia during the chronic phase of infection. In some studies, ART is sufficient to increase the frequency of polyfunctional HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells or to decrease PD-1 expression (30, 41). However, the interpretations of the observations within these studies have relied on extrapolations between studies based upon cohorts with differing levels and durations of viral suppression or on examination of a limited number of functions or subsets in either CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells.In the present study, we extended our earlier work and comprehensively examined a broad array of functions of HIV-specific T cells derived from two large patient groups, LTNP and progressors on ART, who possess comparable levels of HIV viremia as determined by a sensitive single-copy assay. In response to autologous HIV-infected CD4⁺ T cells, HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell proliferative capacity, IL-2 responsiveness, surface phenotype, PD-1 expression, polyfunctionality, and cytotoxic capacity were measured in considerable detail. We observe that although ART results in restoration of many of these functions, HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell polyfunctionality and proliferative and killing capacities are not restored to levels observed in LTNP.     

Effective Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells Lack an Easily Detectable,Shared Characteristic

The immune correlates of human/simian immunodeficiency virus control remain elusive. While CD8⁺ T lymphocytes likely play a major role in reducing peak viremia and maintaining viral control in the chronic phase, the relative antiviral efficacy of individual virus-specific effector populations is unknown. Conventional assays measure cytokine secretion of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells after cognate peptide recognition. Cytokine secretion, however, does not always directly translate into antiviral efficacy. Recently developed suppression assays assess the efficiency of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells to control viral replication, but these assays often use cell lines or clones. We therefore designed a novel virus production assay to test the ability of freshly ex vivo-sorted simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-specific CD8⁺ T cells to suppress viral replication from SIVmac239-infected CD4⁺ T cells. Using this assay, we established an antiviral hierarchy when we compared CD8⁺ T cells specific for 12 different epitopes. Antiviral efficacy was unrelated to the disease status of each animal, the protein from which the tested epitopes were derived, or the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I restriction of the tested epitopes. Additionally, there was no correlation with the ability to suppress viral replication and epitope avidity, epitope affinity, CD8⁺ T-cell cytokine multifunctionality, the percentage of central and effector memory cell populations, or the expression of PD-1. The ability of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells to suppress viral replication therefore cannot be determined using conventional assays. Our results suggest that a single definitive correlate of immune control may not exist; rather, a successful CD8⁺ T-cell response may be comprised of several factors.CD8⁺ T cells may play a critical role in blunting peak viremia and controlling human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) replication. The transient depletion of CD8⁺ cells in SIV-infected macaques results in increased viral replication (26, 31, 51, 70). The emergence of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells coincides with the reduction of peak viremia (12, 39, 42, 63), and CD8⁺ T-cell pressure selects for escape mutants (6, 9, 13, 28, 29, 38, 60, 61, 85). Furthermore, particular major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I alleles are overrepresented in SIV- and HIV-infected elite controllers (15, 29, 33, 34, 46, 56, 88).Because it has been difficult to induce broadly neutralizing antibodies (Abs), the AIDS vaccine field is currently focused on developing a vaccine designed to elicit HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells (8, 52, 53, 82). Investigators have tried to define the immune correlates of HIV control. Neither the magnitude nor the breadth of epitopes recognized by virus-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses correlates with the control of viral replication (1). The quality of the immune response may, however, contribute to the antiviral efficacy of the effector cells. It has been suggested that the number of cytokines that virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells secrete may correlate with viral control, since HIV-infected nonprogressors appear to maintain CD8⁺ T cells that secrete several cytokines, compared to HIV-infected progressors (11, 27). An increased amount of perforin secretion may also be related to the proliferation of HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in HIV-infected nonprogressors (55). While those studies offer insight into the different immune systems of progressors and nonprogressors, they did not address the mechanism of viral control. Previously, we found no association between the ability of SIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell clones to suppress viral replication in vitro and their ability to secrete gamma interferon (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), or interleukin-2 (IL-2) (18).Evidence suggests that some HIV/SIV proteins may be better vaccine targets than others. CD8⁺ T cells recognize epitopes derived from Gag as early as 2 h postinfection, whereas CD8⁺ T cells specific for epitopes in Env recognize infected cells only at 18 h postinfection (68). Additionally, a previously reported study of HIV-infected individuals showed that an increased breadth of Gag-specific responses was associated with lower viral loads (35, 59, 65, 66). CD8⁺ T-cell responses specific for Env, Rev, Tat, Vif, Vpr, Vpu, and Nef were associated with higher viral loads, with increased breadth of Env in particular being significantly associated with a higher chronic-phase viral set point.None of the many sophisticated methods employed for analyzing the characteristics of HIV- or SIV-specific immune responses clearly demarcate the critical qualities of an effective antiviral response. In an attempt to address these questions, we developed a new assay to measure the antiviral efficacy of individual SIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses sorted directly from fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Using MHC class I tetramers specific for the epitope of interest, we sorted freshly isolated virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells and determined their ability to suppress virus production from SIV-infected CD4⁺ T cells. We then looked for a common characteristic of efficacious epitope-specific CD8⁺ T cells using traditional methods.     

Impact of Cytotoxic-T-Lymphocyte Memory Induction without Virus-Specific CD4+ T-Cell Help on Control of a Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Challenge in Rhesus Macaques

Despite many efforts to develop AIDS vaccines eliciting virus-specific T-cell responses, whether induction of these memory T cells by vaccination before human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) exposure can actually contribute to effective T-cell responses postinfection remains unclear. In particular, induction of HIV-specific memory CD4⁺ T cells may increase the target cell pool for HIV infection because the virus preferentially infects HIV-specific CD4⁺ T cells. However, virus-specific CD4⁺ helper T-cell responses are thought to be important for functional CD8⁺ cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) induction in HIV infection, and it has remained unknown whether HIV-specific memory CD8⁺ T cells induced by vaccination without HIV-specific CD4⁺ T-cell help can exert effective responses after virus exposure. Here we show the impact of CD8⁺ T-cell memory induction without virus-specific CD4⁺ T-cell help on the control of a simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) challenge in rhesus macaques. We developed a prophylactic vaccine by using a Sendai virus (SeV) vector expressing a single SIV Gag_241-249 CTL epitope fused with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). Vaccination resulted in induction of SeV-EGFP-specific CD4⁺ T-cell and Gag_241-249-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses. After a SIV challenge, the vaccinees showed dominant Gag_241-249-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses with higher effector memory frequencies in the acute phase and exhibited significantly reduced viral loads. These results demonstrate that virus-specific memory CD8⁺ T cells induced by vaccination without virus-specific CD4⁺ T-cell help could indeed facilitate SIV control after virus exposure, indicating the benefit of prophylactic vaccination eliciting virus-specific CTL memory with non-virus-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses for HIV control.Virus-specific T-cell responses are crucial for controlling human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) replication (3, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, 37). Therefore, a great deal of effort has been exerted to develop AIDS vaccines eliciting virus-specific T-cell responses (23, 27, 30, 47), but whether this approach actually results in HIV control remains unclear (1, 6). It is important to determine which T-cell responses need to be induced by prophylactic vaccination for HIV control after virus exposure.Because HIV preferentially infects HIV-specific CD4⁺ T cells (5), induction of HIV-specific memory CD4⁺ T cells by vaccination may increase the target cell pool for HIV infection and could enhance viral replication (42). However, CD4⁺ helper T-cell responses are important for functional CD8⁺ cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) induction (11, 40, 43, 46), and it has remained unknown whether HIV-specific memory CD8⁺ T cells induced by vaccination with non-virus-specific CD4⁺ T-cell help (but without HIV-specific CD4⁺ T-cell help) can exert effective responses after virus exposure. Indeed, the real impact of prophylactic induction of CTL memory itself on HIV replication has not been well documented thus far.We previously developed a prophylactic AIDS vaccine consisting of DNA priming followed by boosting with a recombinant Sendai virus (SeV) vector expressing SIVmac239 Gag (26). Evaluation of this vaccine''s efficacy against a SIVmac239 challenge in Burmese rhesus macaques showed that some vaccinees contained SIV replication whereas unvaccinated animals developed AIDS (15, 27). In particular, vaccination consistently resulted in control of SIV replication in those animals possessing the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) haplotype 90-120-Ia. Gag_206-216 (IINEEAADWDL) and Gag_241-249 (SSVDEQIQW) epitope-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses were shown to be involved in SIV control in these vaccinated macaques (14, 16).In the present study, focusing on CD8⁺ T-cell responses directed against one of these epitopes, we have evaluated the efficacy of a vaccine expressing the Gag_241-249 epitope fused with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) against a SIVmac239 challenge in 90-120-Ia-positive rhesus macaques. The animals exhibited this single-epitope-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response and SeV-EGFP-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses after vaccination and showed rapid, dominant induction of potent secondary Gag_241-249-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses after a SIV challenge. Plasma viral loads in these vaccinees were significantly reduced compared to those of naive controls. These results indicate that induction of CD8⁺ T-cell memory without virus-specific CD4⁺ T-cell help by prophylactic vaccination can result in effective CD8⁺ T-cell responses after virus exposure.     

Strong Ability of Nef-Specific CD4+ Cytotoxic T Cells To Suppress Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Replication in HIV-1-Infected CD4+ T Cells and Macrophages

A restricted number of studies have shown that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific cytotoxic CD4⁺ T cells are present in HIV-1-infected individuals. However, the roles of this type of CD4⁺ T cell in the immune responses against an HIV-1 infection remain unclear. In this study, we identified novel Nef epitope-specific HLA-DRB1*0803-restricted cytotoxic CD4⁺ T cells. The CD4⁺ T-cell clones specific for Nef187-203 showed strong gamma interferon production after having been stimulated with autologous B-lymphoblastoid cells infected with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing Nef or pulsed with heat-inactivated virus particles, indicating the presentation of the epitope antigen through both exogenous and endogenous major histocompatibility complex class II processing pathways. Nef187-203-specific CD4⁺ T-cell clones exhibited strong cytotoxic activity against both HIV-1-infected macrophages and CD4⁺ T cells from an HLA-DRB1*0803⁺ donor. In addition, these Nef-specific cytotoxic CD4⁺ T-cell clones exhibited strong ability to suppress HIV-1 replication in both macrophages and CD4⁺ T cells in vitro. Nef187-203-specific cytotoxic CD4⁺ T cells were detected in cultures of peptide-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and in ex vivo PBMCs from 40% and 20% of DRB1*0803⁺ donors, respectively. These results suggest that HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ T cells may directly control HIV-1 infection in vivo by suppressing virus replication in HIV-1 natural host cells.Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) play a central role in the control of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) during acute and chronic phases of an HIV-1 infection (5, 29, 34). However, HIV-1 escapes from the immune surveillance of CD8⁺ CTLs by mechanisms such as mutations of immunodominant CTL epitopes and downregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecules on the infected cells (9, 11, 12, 49). Therefore, most HIV-1-infected patients without highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) develop AIDS eventually.HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ T cells also play an important role in host immune responses against HIV-1 infections. An inverse association of CD4⁺ T-cell responses with viral load in chronically HIV-1-infected patients was documented in a series of earlier studies (8, 36, 39, 41, 48), although the causal relationship between them still remains unclear (23). Classically, CD4⁺ T cells help the expansion of CD8⁺ CTLs by producing growth factors such as interleukin-2 (IL-2) or by their CD40 ligand interaction with antigen-processing cells and CD8⁺ CTLs. In addition, CD4⁺ T cells provide activation of macrophages, which can professionally maintain CD8⁺ T-cell memory (17). On the other hand, the direct ability of virus-specific cytotoxic CD4⁺ T cells (CD4⁺ CTLs) to kill target cells has been widely observed in human virus infections such as those by human cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), hepatitis B virus, Dengue virus, and HIV-1 (2, 4, 10, 19, 30, 31, 38, 50). Furthermore, one study showed that mouse CD4⁺ T cells specific for lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus have cytotoxic activity in vivo (25). These results, taken together, indicate that a subset of effector CD4⁺ T cells develops cytolytic activity in response to virus infections.HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ CTLs were found to be prevalent in HIV-1 infections, as Gag-specific cytotoxic CD4⁺ T cells were detected directly ex vivo among peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from an HIV-1-infected long-term nonprogressor (31). Other studies showed that up to 50% of the CD4⁺ T cells in some HIV-1-infected donors can exhibit a clear cytolytic potential, in contrast to the fact that healthy individuals display few of these cells (3, 4). These studies indicate the real existence of CD4⁺ CTLs in HIV-1 infections.The roles of CD4⁺ CTLs in the control of an HIV-1 infection have not been widely explored. It is known that Gag-specific CD4⁺ CTLs can suppress HIV-1 replication in a human T-cell leukemia virus type 1-immortalized CD4⁺ T-cell line (31). However, the functions of CD4⁺ T cells specific for other HIV-1 antigens remain unclear. On the other hand, the abilities of CD4⁺ CTLs to suppress HIV-1 replication in infected macrophages and CD4⁺ T cells may be different, as in the case of CD8⁺ CTLs for HIV-1-infected macrophages (17). In this study, we identified Nef-specific CD4⁺ T cells and investigated their ability to kill HIV-1 R5 virus-infected macrophages and HIV-1 X4 virus-infected CD4⁺ T cells and to suppress HIV-1 replication in the infected macrophages and CD4⁺ T cells. The results obtained in the present study show for the first time the ability of HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ CTLs to suppress HIV-1 replication in natural host cells, i.e., macrophages and CD4⁺ T cells.     

Polyfunctional CD4+ T-Cell Induction in Neutralizing Antibody-Triggered Control of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

Rapid depletion of memory CD4⁺ T cells and delayed induction of neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses are characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infections. Although it was speculated that postinfection NAb induction could have only a limited suppressive effect on primary HIV replication, a recent study has shown that a single passive NAb immunization of rhesus macaques 1 week after SIV challenge can result in reduction of viral loads at the set point, indicating a possible contribution of postinfection NAb responses to virus control. However, the mechanism accounting for this NAb-triggered SIV control has remained unclear. Here, we report rapid induction of virus-specific polyfunctional T-cell responses after the passive NAb immunization postinfection. Analysis of SIV Gag-specific responses of gamma interferon, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-2, macrophage inflammatory protein 1β, and CD107a revealed that the polyfunctionality of Gag-specific CD4⁺ T cells, as defined by the multiplicity of these responses, was markedly elevated in the acute phase in NAb-immunized animals. In the chronic phase, despite the absence of detectable NAbs, virus control was maintained, accompanied by polyfunctional Gag-specific T-cell responses. These results implicate virus-specific polyfunctional CD4⁺ T-cell responses in this NAb-triggered virus control, suggesting possible synergism between NAbs and T cells for control of HIV/SIV replication.Virus-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell responses are crucial for the control of pathogenic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infections (5, 6, 20, 23, 30, 39, 40). However, CD4⁺ T cells, especially CCR5⁺ memory CD4⁺ T cells, are themselves targets for these viruses, which may be an obstacle to potent virus-specific CD4⁺ T-cell induction (10, 47, 52). Indeed, HIV-1/SIV infection causes rapid, massive depletion of memory CD4⁺ T cells (26, 31), and host immune responses fail to contain viral replication and allow persistent chronic infection, although virus-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses exert suppressive pressure on viral replication (15).Recently, the importance of T-cell quality in virus containment has been high-lighted, and T-cell polyfunctionality, which is defined by their multiplicity of antigen-specific cytokine production, has been analyzed as an indicator of T-cell quality (4, 8, 11, 41). However, there has been no evidence indicating an association of polyfunctional T-cell responses in the acute phase with HIV-1/SIV control. Even in the chronic phase, whether polyfunctional CD4⁺ T-cell responses may be associated with virus control has been unclear, although an inverse correlation between polyfunctional CD8⁺ T-cell responses and viral loads has been shown in HIV-1-infected individuals (4).Another characteristic of HIV-1/SIV infections is the absence of potent neutralizing antibody (NAb) induction during the acute phase (7). This is mainly due to the unusually neutralization-resistant nature of the virus, such as masking of target epitopes in viral envelope proteins (24). Whether this lack of effective NAb response contributes to the failure to control the virus, and whether NAb induction in the acute phase can contribute to virus control, remains unclear. Previous studies documenting virus escape from NAb recognition suggested that NAbs can also exert selective pressure on viral replication to a certain extent (38, 45, 49), but it was speculated that postinfection NAb induction could have only a limited suppressive effect on primary HIV-1/SIV replication (34, 37).By passive NAb immunization of rhesus macaques after SIV challenge, we recently provided evidence indicating that the presence of NAbs during the acute phase can result in SIV control (50). In that study, passive NAb immunization 1 week after SIVmac239 challenge resulted in transient detectable NAb responses followed by reduction in set point viral loads compared to unimmunized macaques. However, the mechanism of this virus control has remained unclear. In the present study, we found rapid appearance of polyfunctional Gag-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses after such passive NAb immunization postinfection. These animals maintained virus control for more than 1 year in the absence of detectable plasma NAbs, which was accompanied by potent Gag-specific T-cell responses. These results implicate virus-specific polyfunctional CD4⁺ T-cell responses in this NAb-triggered primary and long-term SIV control.     

Predominant Clonal Accumulation of CD8+ T Cells with Moderate Avidity in the Central Nervous Systems of Theiler's Virus-Infected C57BL/6 Mice

Induction of antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cells bearing a high-avidity T-cell receptor (TCR) is thought to be an important factor in antiviral and antitumor immune responses. However, the relationship between TCR diversity and functional avidity of epitope-specific CD8⁺ T cells accumulating in the central nervous system (CNS) during viral infection is unknown. Hence, analysis of T-cell diversity at the clonal level is important to understand the fate and function of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells. In this study, we examined the Vβ diversity and avidity of CD8⁺ T cells specific to the predominant epitope (VP2_121-130) of Theiler''s murine encephalomyelitis virus. We found that Vβ6⁺ CD8⁺ T cells, associated with epitope specificity, predominantly expanded in the CNS during viral infection. Further investigations of antigen-specific Vβ6⁺ CD8⁺ T cells by CDR3 spectratyping and sequencing indicated that distinct T-cell clonotypes are preferentially increased in the CNS compared to the periphery. Among the epitope-specific Vβ6⁺ CD8⁺ T cells, MGX-Jβ1.1 motif-bearing cells, which could be found at a high precursor frequency in naïve mice, were expanded in the CNS and tightly associated with gamma interferon production. These T cells displayed moderate avidity for the cognate epitope rather than the high avidity normally observed in memory/effector T cells. Therefore, our findings provide new insights into the CD8⁺ T-cell repertoire during immune responses to viral infection in the CNS.Theiler''s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) is a member of the Cardiovirus genus within the Picornaviridae family (43). This virus is a common enteric pathogen among wild mice but rarely causes neurological disease (57). However, when it infects susceptible mice (e.g., the SJL/J [SJL] strain) intracerebrally, it reproducibly induces a chronic immune-mediated demyelinating disease that has been studied as an infectious model of human multiple sclerosis (MS) (10, 30). In contrast, infection of resistant mice like those of the C57BL/6 (B6) strain results in strong antiviral immune responses that clear the virus effectively and prevent disease development (24, 31). Therefore, immune responses in B6 mice have been often compared to those in susceptible SJL mice to understand the nature of protective versus pathogenic immunity in these mice.It has been shown that the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) H-2D locus is a critical genetic factor for resistance to TMEV-induced demyelinating disease (9, 49). For example, expression of the H-2D^b transgene makes susceptible FVB mice resistant by inducing strong H-2D^b-restricted VP2_121-130-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses (36). This acquired resistance is abolished when VP2_121-130-specific T cells are tolerized by introducing the VP2 transgene (45). These results strongly suggest that CD8⁺ T cells generated in the presence of H-2D^b are critical for viral clearance from the central nervous system (CNS). Since the cardinal difference between the resistant B6 and susceptible SJL strains is the quantity, not the quality, of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells (23, 32), strong CD8⁺ T-cell responses are probably required to prevent viral persistence and the consequent development of demyelinating disease. More than threefold more virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells were found in the CNSs of resistant B6 mice than in those of susceptible SJL mice at the acute phase of infection. Thus, the level of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells at an early phase of the immune response may be a critical factor in resistance to the disease.Many recent investigations indicate that oligoclonal CD8⁺ T cells accumulate in the CNSs of MS patients (4, 38, 51). In addition, CD8⁺ T cells may also induce the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) (54). Therefore, clonal expansion of certain CD8⁺ T cells may be associated with the pathogenesis of demyelinating diseases. However, B6 mice, which are resistant to TMEV-induced demyelinating disease, induce strong CD8⁺ T-cell responses to a single predominant epitope (VP2_121-130), i.e., ≥70% of CNS-infiltrating CD8⁺ T cells (41, 42). These CD8⁺ T cells result in effective viral clearance yet remain at a low level in the CNS more than 120 days postinfection (dpi) without detectable pathology (42). This inconsistency led us to investigate the shape and quality of the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire accumulating in the CNSs of B6 mice.The CD8⁺ T-cell responses induced after viral infection have previously been investigated with other animal viruses, including influenza virus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), and Borna disease virus (11, 14, 35, 47, 58). Among these models, the detailed T-cell Vβ repertoire in the CNS was described only in the MHV model (46). CD8⁺ T-cell responses against TMEV in B6 mice are primarily against a single predominant epitope (22, 36, 41). However, virtually no study of the TCR Vβ repertoires of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells has been reported. Furthermore, it is not yet known whether a particular TCR Vβ repertoire is associated with the avidity and/or function of CD8⁺ T cells in the CNS. Since protective versus pathogenic CD8⁺ T cells may correlate with their Vβ repertoire and T-cell function, these studies may help to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of protection versus pathogenesis of CD8⁺ T cells in the CNS.In this study, we have addressed several important questions about the CD8⁺ T-cell repertoire in the CNS. First, what is the pattern of Vβ usage in TMEV-infected B6 mice? Second, are there differences in the antigen-specific CD8⁺ T-cell clonotypes between the CNS and periphery? Third, are the T-cell clonotypes maintained in the CNS during the viral infection? Fourth, what is the functional avidity of T cells accumulating in the CNS during this virus infection? Last, what possible factors are associated with repertoire selection and expansion in the CNS? Our results show that Vβ6⁺ CD8⁺ T cells preferentially expand in the CNS during viral infection. Further analyses of the CDR3 region of antigen-specific Vβ6⁺ CD8⁺ T cells by spectratyping and sequencing indicate that distinct T-cell clonotypes are expanded in the CNS compared to those in the periphery. T cells expressing a particular Vβ6-CDR3-Jβ1.1 sequence are preferentially retained in the CNS during the course of viral infection. Interestingly, these T cells are capable of producing gamma interferon (IFN-γ) upon stimulation and display moderate avidity for the cognate epitope. We believe that our findings will provide important information regarding the CD8⁺ T-cell repertoire during viral infection and that these results may help to provide a better understanding of antiviral CD8⁺ T-cell immunity in the CNS.     

CD4+ T Cells Are Required for the Priming of CD8+ T Cells following Infection with Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1

The role of CD4⁺ helper T cells in modulating the acquired immune response to herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) remains ill defined; in particular, it is unclear whether CD4⁺ T cells are needed for the generation of the protective HSV-1-specific CD8⁺-T-cell response. This study examined the contribution of CD4⁺ T cells in the generation of the primary CD8⁺-T-cell responses following acute infection with HSV-1. The results demonstrate that the CD8⁺-T-cell response generated in the draining lymph nodes of CD4⁺-T-cell-depleted C57BL/6 mice and B6-MHC-II^−/− mice is quantitatively and qualitatively distinct from the CD8⁺ T cells generated in normal C57BL/6 mice. Phenotypic analyses show that virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells express comparable levels of the activation marker CD44 in mice lacking CD4⁺ T cells and normal mice. In contrast, CD8⁺ T cells generated in the absence of CD4⁺ T cells express the interleukin 2 receptor α-chain (CD25) at lower levels. Importantly, the CD8⁺ T cells in the CD4⁺-T-cell-deficient environment are functionally active with respect to the expression of cytolytic activity in vivo but exhibit a diminished capacity to produce gamma interferon and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Furthermore, the primary expansion of HSV-1-specific CD8⁺ T cells is diminished in the absence of CD4⁺-T-cell help. These results suggest that CD4⁺-T-cell help is essential for the generation of fully functional CD8⁺ T cells during the primary response to HSV-1 infection.Infection due to herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) results in a wide spectrum of clinical presentations depending on the host''s age, the host''s immune status, and the route of inoculation (47). HSV-1 typically causes mild and self-limited lesions on the orofacial areas or genital sites. However, the disease can be life-threatening, as in the case of neonatal and central nervous system infections (18). The host''s immune responses, particularly CD8⁺ T cells, play an important role in determining the outcome of HSV infections in both the natural human host (18, 19, 28) and experimental murine models (11, 43). Immunodepletion and adoptive transfer studies have demonstrated the role of CD8⁺ T cells in reducing viral replication, resolving cutaneous disease, and providing overall protection upon rechallenge (6, 25, 26). CD8⁺ T cells play a particularly important role in preventing infection of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and the reactivation of latent virus from neurons in the sensory ganglia of infected mice (21, 24, 36). The mechanisms that CD8⁺ T cells employ include gamma interferon (IFN-γ) production and functions associated with cytolytic granule content at the sites of primary infection (23, 31, 38). In the PNS of infected mice, the mechanisms primarily involve IFN-γ secretion (16, 20, 29), particularly against infected neurons expressing surface Qa-1 (41). Histopathological evidence from HSV-1-infected human ganglion sections show a large CD8⁺-T-cell infiltrate and the presence of inflammatory cytokines, suggesting that the presence of activated, effector memory cells within the PNS is important for maintaining HSV-1 latency in the natural human host (10, 42).The generation of a robust CD8⁺-T-cell response is essential for the control of various infectious pathogens. Some studies suggest that a brief interaction with antigen-presenting cells (APCs) is sufficient for CD8⁺-T-cell activation and expansion into functional effectors (44). However, the magnitude and quality of the overall CD8⁺-T-cell response generated may be dependent on additional factors (49). Recent evidence suggests that CD4⁺ T cells facilitate the activation and development of CD8⁺-T-cell responses either directly through the provision of cytokines or indirectly by the conditioning of dendritic cells (DC) (8, 48, 51). Those studies suggested that the latter mechanism is the dominant pathway, wherein CD4⁺ T cells assist CD8⁺-T-cell priming via the engagement of CD40 ligand (CD154) on CD4⁺ T cells and CD40 expressed on DC (4, 30, 33). This interaction results in the activation and maturation of DC, making them competent to stimulate antigen-specific CD8⁺-T-cell responses (35, 37).The requirement for CD4⁺-T-cell help in the generation of primary and secondary CD8⁺-T-cell responses to antigen varies. Primary CD8⁺-T-cell responses to infectious pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), influenza virus, and vaccinia virus, can be mounted effectively independently of CD4⁺-T-cell help (3, 12, 22, 34). In contrast, primary CD8⁺-T-cell responses to nonmicrobial antigens display an absolute dependence on CD4⁺-T-cell help (4, 5, 30, 33, 46). This observed difference in the requirement for CD4⁺-T-cell help may ultimately be a product of the initial inflammatory stimulus generated following immunization (49). Microbial antigens trigger an inflammatory response that can lead to the direct activation and priming of APCs, such as DC, thereby bypassing the need for CD4⁺-T-cell help. Nonmicrobial antigens, however, trigger an attenuated inflammatory response that does not directly activate and prime DCs. In the absence of this inflammation, CD4⁺ T cells are thought to condition and license DC functions through CD154/CD40 interactions, which leads to the subsequent activation of antigen-specific CD8⁺-T-cell responses (5, 49). Even in the case of pathogens where primary CD8⁺-T-cell responses were independent of CD4⁺-T-cell help, the secondary responses to these pathogens were found to be defective in the absence of CD4⁺-T-cell help (3, 12, 34, 40).The requirement for CD4⁺-T-cell help in priming CD8⁺-T-cell responses against HSV-1 infection is not well defined. Earlier studies with HSV-1 suggested that CD4⁺ T cells play an important role in the generation of primary CD8⁺-T-cell responses, detected in vitro, to acute infection with HSV-1 (14), principally through the provision of interleukin 2 (IL-2) for optimal CD8⁺-T-cell differentiation and proliferation. Subsequent studies, utilizing an in vivo approach, indicated that CD4⁺ T cells were not required for CD8⁺-T-cell-mediated cytolytic function (23). CD4⁺ T cells are thought to provide help by conditioning DC in a cognate, antigen-specific manner, thereby making them competent to stimulate HSV-1-specific CD8⁺-T-cell responses (37). By contrast, findings from other studies show that CD4⁺-T-cell-depleted mice were able to fully recover from acute infection with HSV-1 (38). These studies imply that the absence of CD4⁺ T cells does not prevent priming of CD8⁺ T cells in vivo.Studies from this laboratory have identified two distinct HSV-1-specific CD8⁺-T-cell subpopulations generated during the primary response, based upon the ability to synthesize IFN-γ following antigenic stimulation in vitro (1). To better understand the need for CD4⁺-T-cell help, we examined the functional characteristics and phenotypes of these CD8⁺-T-cell populations generated during a primary response to acute infection with HSV-1 in mice lacking CD4⁺ T cells. Our findings show that primary CD8⁺-T-cell responses to HSV-1 are compromised in the absence of CD4⁺-T-cell help. Specifically, the HSV-1 gB-specific CD8⁺ T cells produced in the absence of CD4⁺ T cells were found to be active with regard to cytolysis in vivo but were functionally impaired in the production of IFN-γ and TNF-α compared with intact C57BL/6 mice. Virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells were also reduced in number in CD4-depleted mice and in B6 mice lacking major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II expression (B6-MHC-II^−/−) compared to wild-type (WT) mice. In addition, our data showed higher virus burdens in the infectious tissues obtained from mice lacking CD4⁺ T cells than in those from intact mice. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that CD4⁺-T-cell help is essential for the generation of primary CD8⁺-T-cell responses following acute cutaneous infection with HSV-1.     

The Receptor Complex Associated with Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Type 3 (HTLV-3) Env-Mediated Binding and Entry Is Distinct from,but Overlaps with,the Receptor Complexes of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2

Little is known about the transmission or tropism of the newly discovered human retrovirus, human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 3 (HTLV-3). Here, we examine the entry requirements of HTLV-3 using independently expressed Env proteins. We observed that HTLV-3 surface glycoprotein (SU) binds efficiently to both activated CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. This contrasts with both HTLV-1 SU, which primarily binds to activated CD4⁺ T cells, and HTLV-2 SU, which primarily binds to activated CD8⁺ T cells. Binding studies with heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) and neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), two molecules important for HTLV-1 entry, revealed that these molecules also enhance HTLV-3 SU binding. However, unlike HTLV-1 SU, HTLV-3 SU can bind efficiently in the absence of both HSPGs and NRP-1. Studies of entry performed with HTLV-3 Env-pseudotyped viruses together with SU binding studies revealed that, for HTLV-1, glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) functions at a postbinding step during HTLV-3 Env-mediated entry. Further studies revealed that HTLV-3 SU binds efficiently to naïve CD4⁺ T cells, which do not bind either HTLV-1 or HTLV-2 SU and do not express detectable levels of HSPGs, NRP-1, and GLUT-1. These results indicate that the complex of receptor molecules used by HTLV-3 to bind to primary T lymphocytes differs from that of both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2.The primate T-cell lymphotropic virus (PTLV) group of deltaretroviruses consists of three types of human T-cell lymphotropic viruses (HTLVs) (HTLV-1, HTLV-2, HTLV-3), their closely related simian T-cell lymphotropic viruses (STLVs) (STLV-1, STLV-2, STLV-3), an HTLV (HTLV-4) for which a simian counterpart has not been yet identified, and an STLV (STLV-5) originally described as a divergent STLV-1 (5-7, 30, 35, 37, 38, 45, 51, 53). HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, which have a 70% nucleotide homology, differ in both their pathobiology and tropism (reviewed in reference 13). While HTLV-1 causes a neurological disorder (tropical spastic paraparesis/HTLV-1-associated myelopathy) and a hematological disease (adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma) (15, 42, 55), HTLV-2 is only rarely associated with tropical spastic paraparesis/HTLV-1-associated myelopathy-like disease and is not definitively linked to any lymphoproliferative disease (12, 20). In vivo, both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 infect T cells. Although HTLV-1 is primarily found in CD4⁺ T cells, other cell types in the peripheral blood of infected individuals have been found to contain HTLV-1, including CD8⁺ T cells, dendritic cells, and B cells (19, 29, 33, 36, 46).Binding and entry of retroviruses requires specific interactions between the Env glycoproteins on the virus and cell surface receptor complexes on target cells. For HTLV-1, three molecules have been identified as important for entry, as follows: heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) (16, 22, 26, 28, 29, 34, 39, 44). Recent studies support a model in which HSPG and NRP-1 function during the initial binding of HTLV-1 to target cells, and GLUT-1 functions at a postattachment stage, most likely to facilitate fusion (29, 34, 49). Efficient HTLV-2 binding and entry requires NRP-1 and GLUT-1 but not HSPGs (16, 26, 39, 49).This difference in the molecules required for binding to target cells reflects differences in the T-cell tropisms of these two viruses. Activated CD4⁺ T cells express much higher levels of HSPGs than CD8⁺ T cells (26). In infected individuals, HTLV-1 is primarily found in CD4⁺ T cells, while HTLV-2 is primarily found in CD8⁺ T cells (21, 43, 46). In vitro, HTLV-1 preferentially transforms CD4⁺ T cells while HTLV-2 preferentially transforms CD8⁺ T cells, and this difference has been mapped to the Env proteins (54).We and others have reported the discovery of HTLV-3 in two Cameroonese inhabitants (6, 7, 53). We recently uncovered the presence of a third HTLV-3 strain in a different population living several hundred kilometers away from the previously identified groups (5), suggesting that this virus may be common in central Africa. Since the HTLV-3 sequences were obtained by PCR amplification of DNA isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of infected individuals, little is known about its tropism and pathobiology in vivo. Based on the correlation between HSPG expression levels and viral tropisms of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, we reasoned that knowledge about the HTLV-3 receptors might provide insight into the tropism of this virus. We therefore generated vectors expressing HTLV-3 Env proteins and used them to begin to characterize the receptor complex used by HTLV-3 to bind and enter cells.     

Proliferation Capacity and Cytotoxic Activity Are Mediated by Functionally and Phenotypically Distinct Virus-Specific CD8 T Cells Defined by Interleukin-7Rα (CD127) and Perforin Expression

Cytotoxicity and proliferation capacity are key functions of antiviral CD8 T cells. In the present study, we investigated a series of markers to define these functions in virus-specific CD8 T cells. We provide evidence that there is a lack of coexpression of perforin and CD127 in human CD8 T cells. CD127 expression on virus-specific CD8 T cells correlated positively with proliferation capacity and negatively with perforin expression and cytotoxicity. Influenza virus-, cytomegalovirus-, and Epstein-Barr virus/human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific CD8 T cells were predominantly composed of CD127⁺ perforin⁻/CD127⁻ perforin⁺, and CD127⁻/perforin⁻ CD8 T cells, respectively. CD127⁻/perforin⁻ and CD127⁻/perforin⁺ cells expressed significantly more PD-1 and CD57, respectively. Consistently, intracellular cytokine (gamma interferon, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-2 [IL-2]) responses combined to perforin detection confirmed that virus-specific CD8 T cells were mostly composed of either perforin⁺/IL-2⁻ or perforin⁻/IL-2⁺ cells. In addition, perforin expression and IL-2 secretion were negatively correlated in virus-specific CD8 T cells (P < 0.01). As previously shown for perforin, changes in antigen exposure modulated also CD127 expression. Based on the above results, proliferating (CD127⁺/IL-2-secreting) and cytotoxic (perforin⁺) CD8 T cells were contained within phenotypically distinct T-cell populations at different stages of activation or differentiation and showed different levels of exhaustion and senescence. Furthermore, the composition of proliferating and cytotoxic CD8 T cells for a given antiviral CD8 T-cell population appeared to be influenced by antigen exposure. These results advance our understanding of the relationship between cytotoxicity, proliferation capacity, the levels of senescence and exhaustion, and antigen exposure of antiviral memory CD8 T cells.Cytotoxic CD8 T cells are a fundamental component of the immune response against viral infections and mediate an important role in immunosurveillance (7, 10, 55), and the induction of vigorous CD8 T-cell responses after vaccination is thought to be a key component of protective immunity (37, 41, 49, 50, 58, 60, 69). Cytotoxic CD8 T cells exert their antiviral and antitumor activity primarily through the secretion of cytotoxic granules containing perforin (pore-forming protein) and several granule-associated proteases, including granzymes (Grms) (5, 15, 20, 44). Several studies have recently advanced the characterization of the mechanism of granule-dependent cytotoxic activity and performed a comprehensive investigation of the content of cytotoxic granules in human virus-specific CD8 T cells (2, 19, 29, 44, 53).Heterogeneous profiles of cytotoxic granules have been identified in different virus-specific memory CD8 T cells and associated with distinct differentiation stages of memory CD8 T cells (2, 19, 29, 44). Furthermore, we have observed a hierarchy among the cytotoxic granules in setting the efficiency of cytotoxic activity and demonstrated that perforin (and to a lesser extent GrmB) but not GrmA or GrmK were associated with cytotoxic activity (29). Recently, a novel mechanism of perforin-dependent granule-independent CTL cytotoxicity has also been demonstrated (45).Major advances in the characterization of antigen (Ag)-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells have been made recently and have aimed at identifying functional profiles that may correlate with protective CD8 T-cell responses (1, 3, 4, 12, 13, 24, 28, 36-38, 40, 41, 49, 50, 56-58, 60, 64, 68). In particular, the functional characterization of antigen-specific T cells was mainly performed on the basis of (i) the pattern of cytokines secreted (i.e., gamma interferon [IFN-γ], tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α], interleukin-2 [IL-2], or macrophage inflammatory protein 1β [MIP-1β]), (ii) the proliferation capacity, and (iii) the cytotoxic capacity (13, 28, 59). Of note, degranulation activity (i.e., CD107a mobilization following specific stimulation) has been used as a surrogate marker of cytotoxic activity (11, 13).The term “polyfunctional” has been used to define T-cell immune responses that, in addition to typical effector functions such as secretion of IFN-γ, TNF-α, or MIP-1β and cytotoxic activity (measured by the degranulation capacity), comprise distinct T-cell populations able to secrete IL-2 and retain proliferation capacity (13, 28, 49, 50). Some evidence indicates that a hallmark of protective immune responses is the presence of polyfunctional T-cell responses (59). Furthermore, the ability to secrete IL-2 was shown to be linked to proliferation capacity, and both factors have been associated with protective antiviral immunity (13, 28, 49, 50). Although a lack of correlation between degranulation activity and GrmB expression was reported in mice (65), the relationship between degranulation activity and perforin expression has never been comprehensively investigated in mice and in humans.The private α chain of the IL-7 receptor (IL-7Rα, also called CD127) has been suggested to selectively identify CD8 T cells that will become long-lived memory cells (6, 34, 36). Moreover, it was shown in mice (34, 36) and humans (14, 48, 63) that the CD127^high memory-precursor CD8 T cells produced IL-2 in contrast to CD127^low effector CD8 T cells. Of interest, CD127 expression has also been shown to correlate with Ag-specific proliferation capacity in mice (34, 36). A similar correlation was observed in humans, although only for polyclonal stimulations (48). With the exception of studies performed in HIV-1 infection, where an association between CD127 expression and HIV-1 viremia has been shown (21, 22, 42, 48, 54), very limited information is available on the CD127 expression in human virus-specific CD8 T cells other that HIV-1.Although cytotoxic activity and proliferation capacity are key components of the antiviral cellular immune response, the relationship between these functions has been only investigated in nonprogressive HIV-1 infection (46), where these two functions were shown to be related. However, it still remains to be determined whether these functions are mediated by the same or by different T-cell populations.In the present study, we performed a comprehensive characterization of virus-specific CD8 T-cell responses against HIV-1, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein Barr virus (EBV), and influenza virus (Flu) in order to (i) analyze the degree of concordance between degranulation activity and perforin/Grm expression; (ii) identify the relevance of CD127 in identifying virus-specific CD8 T cells endowed with proliferation capacity; (iii) delineate the relationship between proliferation capacity, cytotoxic activity, activation/differentiation stage, and level of exhaustion of CD8 T cells; and (iv) determine the influence of antigen exposure in shaping the functional composition of virus-specific CD8 T cells.Our data indicate that cytotoxic (as defined by perforin expression) and proliferating (as defined by CD127 expression or IL-2 secretion) virus-specific CD8 T cells are contained within distinct CD8 T-cell populations. Furthermore, the proportion of proliferating and cytotoxic T cells within a given virus-specific CD8 T-cell population appears to be influenced by antigen exposure. These results advance our understanding of the relationship between cytotoxicity, proliferative capacity, differentiation stage, and Ag exposure of memory CD8 T cells.     

Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Induced Activation and Migration of Respiratory Dendritic Cells and Subsequent Antigen Presentation in the Lung-Draining Lymph Node

In the respiratory tract, different dendritic cell (DC) populations guard a tight balance between tolerance and immunity to infectious or harmless materials to which the airways are continuously exposed. For infectious and noninfectious antigens administered via different routes, different subsets of DC might contribute during the induction of T-cell tolerance and immunity. We studied the impact of primary respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection on respiratory DC composition in C57BL/6 mice. We also tracked the migration of respiratory DC to the lymph nodes and studied antigen presentation by lung-derived and lymph node-resident DC to CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. We observed a massive influx of mainly CD103⁻ CD11b^high CD11c⁺ conventional DC (cDC) and plasmacytoid DC during the first 7 days of RSV infection, while CD103⁺ CD11b^low CD11c⁺ cDC disappeared from the lung. The two major subsets of lung tissue DC, CD103⁺ CD11b^low CD11c⁺ and CD103⁻ CD11b^high CD11c⁺ cDC, both transported RSV RNA to the lung-draining lymph node. Furthermore, these lung-derived cDC subsets as well as resident LN DC, which did not contain viral RNA, displayed viral antigen by major histocompatibility complex class I and class II to CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells. Taken together, our data indicate that during RSV infections, at least three DC subsets might be involved during the activation of lymph node-homing naïve and memory CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells.Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) constitutes a major health burden for infants, elderly people, and immunocompromised individuals (16, 19). The virus infects most children in their first year of life and is the main cause of severe lower respiratory tract infections in infants (19). Despite many decades of research, the immune response to RSV is still not completely understood. Infection with RSV leads to poor development of immunity, and recurrent infections are common (23). In mice, it was found that RSV induces virus-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses in the lung that are functionally impaired (10). It has been suggested that a functional inactivation of CD8⁺ T cells by RSV could be a reason for the short-lived immune response. Furthermore, we and others have previously shown that human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) can be infected with RSV, which results in a strong inhibition of their ability to support proliferative responses and induction of effector function in naïve T cells (11, 12). An early vaccine trial with formalin-inactivated RSV in alum administered intramuscularly elicited a memory immune response that caused a strong aberrant secondary immune response in vaccinees upon natural exposure with live virus. This resulted in a high rate of morbidity in the vaccinated children (31). These observations underscore the necessity to understand the components of the immune response that are protective during RSV infections and the need to understand the mechanism by which protective immunity can be elicited for the development of an effective and safe vaccine.DC play an important role in the initiation of both the innate and adaptive immune responses to pathogens including RSV (3). They are a heterogeneous population of cells represented by two main subsets, the myeloid or “conventional” CD11c⁺ DC (cDC) and the CD11c^low/mPDCA-1⁺ plasmacytoid DC (pDC) (47, 52). cDC can be further divided based on the expression of surface markers and anatomic location. cDC in the tissue and cDC in lymph nodes (LN) appear to be different subsets arising from different pools of progenitor cells and with specialized functions (13, 17, 30, 33, 46). In the mouse lung, two major cDC populations are derived from blood monocytes. CD11c⁺ major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II)-positive (MHC-II⁺) CD103⁻ CD11b^high cDC (CD11b^hi cDC) are localized in the parenchyma. These cells are the main producers of chemokines and are important for the recruitment of leukocytes (4). A second cDC population, CD11c⁺ MHC-II⁺ CD103⁺ CD11b^low cDC (CD103⁺ cDC), is located directly underneath the airway epithelium. These CD103⁺ cDC express the integrin α_Eβ₇; therefore, they are found mainly at the basal lamina of the bronchial epithelia and arterioles, which express E-cadherin, the ligand for α_Eβ₇. Furthermore, CD103⁺ cDC express the tight-junction proteins ZO-2 and claudin-7, which enables them to sample the airways with their extensions (45). In the lung-draining LN, in addition to pDC, at least two steady-state populations of cDC are present, which are characterized by the expression or absence of CD8α. In contrast to the lung tissue DC, these cells enter the LN from the blood, and they are directly derived from a bone marrow precursor (38, 39, 41). In addition, minor fractions of tissue-derived cDC also access draining LN in the steady state (28). Several studies have addressed the roles of different DC subsets that are present in the tissue and LN draining the infection site. In spleen and skin-draining LN, the role of CD8α⁺ cDC seems to be important for the initiation of anti-ovalbumin and antiviral CD8⁺ T-cell responses (6, 26, 35). In mice exposed to innocuous (ovalbumin) or infectious (influenza virus) antigen, functional specialization was described for CD103⁺ and CD11b^hi lung cDC subsets. CD11b^hi cDC presented intranasally administered ovalbumin or influenza virus antigen mainly to naïve CD4⁺ T cells, while CD103⁺ cDC were important for the induction of CD8⁺ T-cell responses (14, 32).The ability of DC to present or cross-present antigens depends on the type of antigenic materials and the uptake mechanism used by antigen-presenting cells. Hence, different pathogens and innocuous antigens might be differently presented by different DC subsets. We studied the kinetics of lung DC migration and repopulation during primary RSV infection in C57BL/6 mice. We found that upon RSV infection, CD103⁺ cDC disappeared from the lung, while there was a net increase in numbers of CD11b^hi cDC, pDC, and macrophages. Within the first 48 h after virus exposure, both CD103⁺ and CD11b^hi cDC rapidly migrated to the lung-draining mediastinal LN (MLN), while this accumulation was absent in the non-lung-draining axillary LN. The migrating cDC showed the highest level of expression of the costimulatory molecules CD40, CD80, and CD86, which are necessary for T-cell stimulation, compared to the MLN-resident cDC. Furthermore, the migrating cDC transported viral RNA to the MLN and were capable of stimulating RSV-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell responses. Resident cDC in the LN were uniformly negative for viral RNA. However, resident cDC in the LN did present viral antigen to CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells via MHC-I and MHC-II, respectively.     

Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells Recognize Vpr- and Rev-Derived Epitopes Early after Infection

The kinetics of CD8⁺ T cell epitope presentation contribute to the antiviral efficacy of these cells yet remain poorly defined. Here, we demonstrate presentation of virion-derived Vpr peptide epitopes early after viral penetration and prior to presentation of Vif-derived epitopes, which required de novo Vif synthesis. Two Rev epitopes exhibited differential presentation kinetics, with one Rev epitope presented within 1 h of infection. We also demonstrate that cytolytic activity mirrors the recognition kinetics of infected cells. These studies show for the first time that Vpr- and Rev-specific CD8⁺ T cells recognize and kill simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected CD4⁺ T cells early after SIV infection.The antiviral activity of AIDS virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells is well documented in both in vivo (1, 4, 21) and in vitro (8, 24, 29) studies. Accordingly, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine modalities that focus on engendering antiviral CD8⁺ T cells are being developed (13, 26, 28). Ideally, a CD8⁺ T cell-based vaccine would stimulate responses against epitopes that are presented by major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) molecules early after infection of a target cell. However, successful selection of antigenic sequences for a CD8⁺ T cell-based vaccine has been frustrated in part by an incomplete understanding of the properties of effective CD8⁺ T cell responses (25).     

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Escapes from Interleukin-2-Producing CD4+ T-Cell Responses without High-Frequency Fixation of Mutations

The presence of interleukin-2 (IL-2)-producing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses has been associated with the immunological control of HIV-1 replication; however, the causal relationship between these factors remains unclear. Here we show that IL-2-producing HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ T cells can be cloned from acutely HIV-1-infected individuals. Despite the early presence of these cells, each of the individuals in the present study exhibited progressive disease, with one individual showing rapid progression. In this rapid progressor, three IL-2-producing HIV-1 Gag-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses were identified and mapped to the following optimal epitopes: HIVWASRELER, REPRGSDIAGT, and FRDYVDRFYKT. Responses to these epitopes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were monitored longitudinally to >1 year postinfection, and contemporaneous circulating plasma viruses were sequenced. A variant of the FRDYVDRFYKT epitope sequence, FRDYVDQFYKT, was observed in 1/21 plasma viruses sequenced at 5 months postinfection and 1/10 viruses at 7 months postinfection. This variant failed to stimulate the corresponding CD4⁺ T-cell clone and thus constitutes an escape mutant. Responses to each of the three Gag epitopes were rapidly lost, and this loss was accompanied by a loss of antigen-specific cells in the periphery as measured by using an FRDYVDRFYKT-presenting major histocompatibility complex class II tetramer. Highly active antiretroviral therapy was associated with the reemergence of FRDYVDRFYKT-specific cells by tetramer. Thus, our data support that IL-2-producing HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses can exert immune pressure during early HIV-1 infection but that the inability of these responses to enforce enduring control of viral replication is related to the deletion and/or dysfunction of HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ T cells rather than to the fixation of escape mutations at high frequencies.In the typical course of acute human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection an initial burst of high-level viremia is reduced by at least 100-fold to a set point level (11, 12). This precipitous drop in viral load is suggestive of a partially effective host immune response to primary HIV-1 infection. Several lines of evidence support an important role for CD8⁺ T cells in suppressing HIV-1 replication in acute infection: principally, the decline in HIV-1 viremia is temporally associated with the emergence of an HIV-1-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response, and the in vivo depletion of CD8⁺ T cells in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques consistently results in elevated viral loads (7, 24, 30). Consistent with the application of effective immune pressure, it has been well established that HIV-1- and simian immunodeficiency virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells drive the emergence and fixation of escape mutations in the epitopes that they target (1, 3, 8, 18, 31, 33, 34). This evidence has contributed to the prioritization of vaccine candidates that elicit potent HIV-1-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses.The role of CD4⁺ T-cell responses in the response to acute HIV-1 infection is less clear. There is compelling evidence that CD4⁺ T-cell help may be critical for the establishment of a qualitatively and quantitatively robust CD8⁺ T-cell memory pool for persistent virus infections (4, 9, 17, 37, 39). Furthermore, an important role for CD4⁺ help in maintaining an effective CD8⁺ T-cell response has been established in the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus model of chronic viral infection (28, 45). Evidence in support of a role for the CD4⁺ T-cell response to HIV-1 infection in suppressing viral replication is derived from studies which demonstrated that a CD4⁺ T-cell response characterized by vigorous proliferation and production of interleukin-2 (IL-2) is associated with control of viremia (6, 35). It has further been demonstrated that the functional defect of CD8⁺ T cells observed in chronic HIV-1 infection can be induced in vitro by the depletion of CD4⁺ T cells or the addition of IL-2-neutralizing antibodies and can be corrected in vivo by vaccine-mediated augmentation of HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses (26). These observations have suggested that an IL-2-producing response may be necessary for controlling viremia. However, in the majority of HIV-1-infected individuals, a qualitative impairment of the HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ T-cell response occurs early after infection, resulting in the loss of proliferative capacity as well as the ability to produce IL-2 (43). This impairment correlates well with levels of antigen and viremia (29). The relationship between viral control and the presence of IL-2-producing HIV-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses must be interpreted with caution, however, as the causal relationship between these two factors is unclear. The maintenance of an IL-2-producing HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ T-cell proliferative response could simply be the result of control of viremia achieved through another means, rather than causal in the association. Therapeutic administration of IL-2 to chronically infected individuals failed to reveal any clinical benefit, perhaps supporting that IL-2 is a marker, rather than a driver, of immunological control (25). However, it is unclear whether the systemic administration of IL-2 effectively substitutes for the targeted production of IL-2 by HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ T cells.The fixation of escape mutations in CD4⁺ T-cell epitopes during acute infection would provide direct evidence that CD4⁺ T cells apply immunological pressure against HIV-1. Harcourt et al. identified epitopes targeted by proliferative CD4⁺ T-cell responses in chronically infected individuals and sequenced these epitopes from proviral DNA at multiple time points (16). Variations in these epitope sequences were observed over time, and a minority of these variants failed to stimulate CD4⁺ T-cell lines raised against the index peptide. This study indicated the potential for HIV-1 virus to escape within proviral populations. However, the observation that the majority of emergent variants were still able to stimulate CD4⁺ T-cell responses argues against potent selective pressure for escape mutants (16). A second study examined gamma interferon (IFN-γ)-producing CD4⁺ T-cell responses and contemporaneous circulating virus epitopes in a cohort of chronically infected, untreated, HIV-1-infected individuals. A lack of intrapatient variability within CD4⁺ T-cell epitopes was observed in this study, and while two of four subjects exhibited epitope sequences that differed from the consensus HIV-1 sequence, there was a trend to greater sequence variability outside of epitopic regions, arguing against potent immune pressure (23). These studies support that HIV-1-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses fail to exert potent selective pressure against cognate epitopes in chronic infection; however, it is difficult to determine whether or not the observed epitopic variations are indicative of relatively weak selective pressures. Since the overall cellular immune response to HIV-1 infection is particularly robust and effective during the acute phase of infection, we examined the kinetics of the HIV-1-specific IL-2-secreting CD4⁺ T-cell-mediated immune response during acute/early HIV-1 infection and studied the effects of this response on circulating plasma viruses.     

Persistence of Transgene Expression Influences CD8+ T-Cell Expansion and Maintenance following Immunization with Recombinant Adenovirus

Previous studies determined that the CD8⁺ T-cell response elicited by recombinant adenovirus exhibited a protracted contraction phase that was associated with long-term presentation of antigen. To gain further insight into this process, a doxycycline-regulated adenovirus was constructed to enable controlled extinction of transgene expression in vivo. We investigated the impact of premature termination of transgene expression at various time points (day 3 to day 60) following immunization. When transgene expression was terminated before the maximum response had been attained, overall expansion was attenuated, yielding a small memory population. When transgene expression was terminated between day 13 and day 30, the memory population was not sustained, demonstrating that the early memory population was antigen dependent. Extinction of transgene expression at day 60 had no obvious impact on memory maintenance, indicating that maintenance of the memory population may ultimately become independent of transgene expression. Premature termination of antigen expression had significant but modest effects on the phenotype and cytokine profile of the memory population. These results offer new insights into the mechanisms of memory CD8⁺ T-cell maintenance following immunization with a recombinant adenovirus.Recombinant human adenovirus 5 (rHuAd5) vector vaccines have garnered considerable attention as platforms for eliciting CD8⁺ T-cell immunity due to their strong immunogenicity in numerous studies, including primate studies and preliminary human trials (30, 32, 53). While these vectors may not represent the optimal serotype for use in humans, due to the high prevalence of preexisting immunity, the robust immunogenicity of rHuAd5 in preclinical models merits further investigation, since the biological information derived from these studies will offer important insights that can be extended to other vaccine platforms.CD8⁺ T cells play an important role in host defense against tumors and viral infections. During the primary phase of the CD8⁺ T-cell response, the activated precursors undergo a rapid and dramatic expansion in cell number, followed by a period of contraction where 80 to 90% of the antigen-specific population dies off, leaving the remaining cells to constitute the memory population (44). CD8⁺ T cells mature over the course of the primary response and acquire the ability to produce gamma interferon (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and, to a lesser degree, interleukin 2 (IL-2). Memory T cells can be divided into central memory and effector memory T cells based on phenotype and anatomical location (44). These phenotypic differences have also been linked to functional differences; however, these relationships remain controversial (2, 16, 20, 46, 55).Various reports have revealed some unexpected qualities of the CD8⁺ T-cell response generated by intramuscular immunization with rHuAd5. The rHuAd5-induced CD8⁺ T-cell response exhibited a protracted contraction phase, and the memory population was composed primarily of effector and effector-memory cells (23, 38, 39, 41, 51). The phenotype of the rHuAd5-elicited CD8⁺ T-cell population was more consistent with the CD8⁺ T-cell population observed in persistent infections, such as polyomavirus (25), murine herpesvirus-68 (35), and murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) (1) infections, than with that observed in acute infections, such as lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) (44), vaccinia virus (15), and influenza virus (24) infections. Further investigation demonstrated that, as in a persistent infection, antigen presentation persisted for a prolonged period following intramuscular immunization with rHuAd5, and transgene expression could persist at low levels for more than 1 year following infection (41, 51). These data suggest that the sustained effector phenotype may arise from prolonged, low-level transgene expression from the rHuAd5 vector, although this connection was not formally proven. It is difficult to fully appreciate the implications of these observations at this time, since chronic exposure to antigen is often associated with CD8⁺ T-cell dysfunction, yet rHuAd5 vectors have been used successfully to elicit protective immunity in many models of pathogen infection and tumor challenge (5, 54). Nevertheless, other reports have provided evidence that rHuAd5 vectors can, indeed, lead to dysfunctional CD8⁺ T-cell immunity (27, 36). Therefore, further investigation is necessary in order to properly assess the implications of the prolonged antigen expression following rHuAd5 immunization in terms of sustaining a functional memory CD8⁺ T-cell response.In the current report, we sought to determine the relationship between transgene expression and CD8⁺ T-cell maintenance and memory. To this end, we constructed an Ad vector with a doxycycline (DOX)-regulated expression cassette that would permit attenuation of gene expression at various times postinfection. Using this reagent, we addressed two key questions. (i) How does the duration of antigen expression affect the magnitude of primary CD8⁺ T-cell expansion? (ii) Is antigen expression required beyond the peak expansion to maintain the memory CD8⁺ T-cell population?     

Enhanced PD-1 Expression by T Cells in Cerebrospinal Fluid Does Not Reflect Functional Exhaustion during Chronic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection

During chronic viral infections, T cells are exhausted due to constant antigen exposure and are associated with enhanced programmed death 1 (PD-1) expression. Deficiencies in the PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway are associated with autoimmune diseases, including those of the central nervous system (CNS). To understand the role of PD-1 expression in regulating T-cell immunity in the CNS during chronic infection, we characterized PD-1 expression in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood of individuals with chronic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. PD-1 expression was higher on HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells than on total CD8⁺ T cells in both CSF and blood. PD-1 expression on CSF T cells correlated positively with CSF HIV-1 RNA and inversely with blood CD4⁺ T-cell counts, suggesting that HIV-1 infection drives higher PD-1 expression on CSF T cells. However, in every HIV-positive individual, PD-1 expression was higher on T cells in CSF than on those in blood, despite HIV-1 RNA levels being lower. Among healthy HIV-negative controls, PD-1 expression was higher in CSF than in blood. Furthermore, frequencies of the senescence marker CD57 were lower on CSF T cells than on blood T cells, consistent with our prior observation of enhanced ex vivo functional capacity of CSF T cells. The higher PD-1 expression level on CSF T cells therefore does not reflect cellular exhaustion but may be a mechanism to downregulate immune-mediated tissue damage in the CNS. As inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is pursued as a therapeutic option for viral infections, potential effects of such a blockade on development of autoimmune responses in the CNS should be considered.Programmed death 1 (PD-1; also called CD279) and its ligands, PD-L1 (also called B7-H1 or CD274) and PD-L2 (also known as B7-DC or CD-273), regulate T-cell activation, peripheral tolerance, and autoimmunity (22, 43). PD-1 can be expressed on CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells, B cells, natural killer T cells, and activated monocytes. PD-L1 is expressed on various cells, including T and B cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, mast cells, nonhematopoietic cell types (including vascular endothelial cells, pancreatic islet cells, astrocytes, keratinocytes, and microglial cells), and cells in immune privileged sites, including the placenta and the eye (22). PD-L2 expression is inducible and is restricted to dendritic cells, monocytes, macrophages, and mast cells (22). During chronic infections, the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibits antigen-specific T-cell responses (7, 8, 35, 46). In human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals, PD-1 expression on HIV-specific T cells in peripheral blood is upregulated and correlates positively with plasma viremia and inversely with CD4⁺ T-cell counts (7, 46). PD-1 expression on HIV-specific T cells is also associated with T-cell exhaustion, as defined by a reduced ability to proliferate and produce cytokines (7, 46). Inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway augments HIV-specific CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T-cell function, and antiretroviral therapy is associated with a significant reduction of PD-1 expression on HIV-specific T cells in peripheral blood (8).The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway also limits immune-mediated tissue damage that may be caused by overreactive peripheral T cells, especially in immune privileged sites such as the central nervous system (CNS). In 1999, the importance of PD-1 for peripheral tolerance was first suggested by studies which showed that PD1^−/− mice develop lupus-like autoimmune diseases (32). In humans, polymorphisms in the PDCD1 gene, which encodes PD-1, have been associated with autoimmune diseases, including lupus, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis (20, 21, 25). Upregulation of PD-L1 in multiple sclerosis lesions from human brain tissue suggests a role for the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in regulating T-cell activation and controlling immunopathological damage (33).The CNS is involved by HIV-1 early during primary infection (6, 13), and approximately 40% of patients who develop advanced AIDS without receiving antiretroviral therapy develop cognitive impairment (6, 13, 38). While HIV-1 proteins gp120 (3, 16) and Tat (30) are directly neurotoxic and may contribute to HIV-associated dementia, detrimental neuropathogenic effects have also been postulated for inflammatory and innate immune cells, especially monocytes/macrophages and T cells (11, 19, 49, 50). Immune responses cause neuropathogenesis during other viral infections, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes can worsen the disease through direct cytotoxicity or release of inflammatory cytokines such as gamma interferon (IFN-γ) (14). However, we recently described higher frequencies of functional HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) than in blood among asymptomatic HIV-positive individuals with little or no HIV-1 RNA in CSF, suggesting that HIV-1-specific CD8⁺ T cells help to control intrathecal viral replication (40).To understand the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in regulating T-cell responses during viral infection of the CNS, we characterized PD-1 expression on T cells in CSF and peripheral blood among asymptomatic HIV-positive individuals. We hypothesized that T-cell PD1 expression would be lower in CSF than in blood, since HIV-1 RNA concentrations are lower in CSF than in plasma and the magnitude and breadth of IFN-γ-secreting HIV-specific T cells are greater in CSF than in blood (40). We show that, in CSF, HIV-1 RNA correlates directly with PD-1 expression on CD4⁺, CD8⁺, and HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells. Unexpectedly, PD-1 expression on all T cells is higher in CSF than in blood in HIV-positive patients and healthy HIV-negative controls. In contrast, expression of the senescence marker CD57 is lower in CSF than in blood. These data suggest that higher PD-1 expression on T cells in CSF may be a mechanism to regulate T-cell immunity in the CNS, rather than indicating T-cell exhaustion, and that this regulation is increased by HIV-1 replication.     

Selective Expression of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Nef in Specific Immune Cell Populations of Transgenic Mice Is Associated with Distinct AIDS-Like Phenotypes

We previously reported that CD4C/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)^Nef transgenic (Tg) mice, expressing Nef in CD4⁺ T cells and cells of the macrophage/dendritic cell (DC) lineage, develop a severe AIDS-like disease, characterized by depletion of CD4⁺ T cells, as well as lung, heart, and kidney diseases. In order to determine the contribution of distinct populations of hematopoietic cells to the development of this AIDS-like disease, five additional Tg strains expressing Nef through restricted cell-specific regulatory elements were generated. These Tg strains express Nef in CD4⁺ T cells, DCs, and macrophages (CD4E/HIV^Nef); in CD4⁺ T cells and DCs (mCD4/HIV^Nef and CD4F/HIV^Nef); in macrophages and DCs (CD68/HIV^Nef); or mainly in DCs (CD11c/HIV^Nef). None of these Tg strains developed significant lung and kidney diseases, suggesting the existence of as-yet-unidentified Nef-expressing cell subset(s) that are responsible for inducing organ disease in CD4C/HIV^Nef Tg mice. Mice from all five strains developed persistent oral carriage of Candida albicans, suggesting an impaired immune function. Only strains expressing Nef in CD4⁺ T cells showed CD4⁺ T-cell depletion, activation, and apoptosis. These results demonstrate that expression of Nef in CD4⁺ T cells is the primary determinant of their depletion. Therefore, the pattern of Nef expression in specific cell population(s) largely determines the nature of the resulting pathological changes.The major cell targets and reservoirs for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection in vivo are CD4⁺ T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells (macrophages and dendritic cells [DC]) (21, 24, 51). The cell specificity of these viruses is largely dependent on the expression of CD4 and of its coreceptors, CCR5 and CXCR-4, at the cell surface (29, 66). Infection of these immune cells leads to the severe disease, AIDS, showing widespread manifestations, including progressive immunodeficiency, immune activation, CD4⁺ T-cell depletion, wasting, dementia, nephropathy, heart and lung diseases, and susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens, such as Candida albicans (1, 27, 31, 37, 41, 82, 93, 109). It is reasonable to assume that the various pathological changes in AIDS result from the expression of one or many HIV-1/SIV proteins in these immune target cells. However, assigning the contribution of each infected cell subset to each phenotype has been remarkably difficult, despite evidence that AIDS T-cell phenotypes can present very differently depending on the strains of infecting HIV-1 or SIV or on the cells targeted by the virus (4, 39, 49, 52, 72). For example, the T-cell-tropic X4 HIV strains have long been associated with late events and severe CD4⁺ T-cell depletion (22, 85, 96). However, there are a number of target cell subsets expressing CD4 and CXCR-4, and identifying which one is responsible for this enhanced virulence has not been achieved in vivo. Similarly, the replication of SIV in specific regions of the thymus (cortical versus medullary areas), has been associated with very different outcomes but, unfortunately, the critical target cells of the viruses were not identified either in these studies (60, 80). The task is even more complex, because HIV-1 or SIV can infect several cell subsets within a single cell population. In the thymus, double (CD4⁻ CD8⁻)-negative (DN) or triple (CD3⁻ CD4⁻ CD8⁻)-negative (TN) T cells, as well as double-positive (CD4⁺ CD8⁺) (DP) T cells, are infectible by HIV-1 in vitro (9, 28, 74, 84, 98, 99, 110) and in SCID-hu mice (2, 5, 91, 94). In peripheral organs, gut memory CCR5⁺ CD4⁺ T cells are primarily infected with R5 SIV, SHIV, or HIV, while circulating CD4⁺ T cells can be infected by X4 viruses (13, 42, 49, 69, 70, 100, 101, 104). Moreover, some detrimental effects on CD4⁺ T cells have been postulated to originate from HIV-1/SIV gene expression in bystander cells, such as macrophages or DC, suggesting that other infected target cells may contribute to the loss of CD4⁺ T cells (6, 7, 32, 36, 64, 90).Similarly, the infected cell population(s) required and sufficient to induce the organ diseases associated with HIV-1/SIV expression (brain, heart, and kidney) have not yet all been identified. For lung or kidney disease, HIV-specific cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells (1, 75) or infected podocytes (50, 95), respectively, have been implicated. Activated macrophages have been postulated to play an important role in heart disease (108) and in AIDS dementia (35), although other target cells could be infected by macrophage-tropic viruses and may contribute significantly to the decrease of central nervous system functions (11, 86, 97), as previously pointed out (25).Therefore, because of the widespread nature of HIV-1 infection and the difficulty in extrapolating tropism of HIV-1/SIV in vitro to their cell targeting in vivo (8, 10, 71), alternative approaches are needed to establish the contribution of individual infected cell populations to the multiorgan phenotypes observed in AIDS. To this end, we developed a transgenic (Tg) mouse model of AIDS using a nonreplicating HIV-1 genome expressed through the regulatory sequences of the human CD4 gene (CD4C), in the same murine cells as those targeted by HIV-1 in humans, namely, in immature and mature CD4⁺ T cells, as well as in cells of the macrophage/DC lineages (47, 48, 77; unpublished data). These CD4C/HIV Tg mice develop a multitude of pathologies closely mimicking those of AIDS patients. These include a gradual destruction of the immune system, characterized among other things by thymic and lymphoid organ atrophy, depletion of mature and immature CD4⁺ T lymphocytes, activation of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, susceptibility to mucosal candidiasis, HIV-associated nephropathy, and pulmonary and cardiac complications (26, 43, 44, 57, 76, 77, 79, 106). We demonstrated that Nef is the major determinant of the HIV-1 pathogenicity in CD4C/HIV Tg mice (44). The similarities of the AIDS-like phenotypes of these Tg mice to those in human AIDS strongly suggest that such a Tg mouse approach can be used to investigate the contribution of distinct HIV-1-expressing cell populations to their development.In the present study, we constructed and characterized five additional mouse Tg strains expressing Nef, through distinct regulatory elements, in cell populations more restricted than in CD4C/HIV Tg mice. The aim of this effort was to assess whether, and to what extent, the targeting of Nef in distinct immune cell populations affects disease development and progression.     

Tissue-Specific Differences in PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression during Chronic Viral Infection: Implications for CD8 T-Cell Exhaustion

The PD-1/PD-L pathway plays a major role in regulating T-cell exhaustion during chronic viral infections in animal models, as well as in humans, and blockade of this pathway can revive exhausted CD8⁺ T cells. We examined the expression of PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, in multiple tissues during the course of chronic viral infection and determined how the amount of PD-1 expressed, as well as the anatomical location, influenced the function of exhausted CD8 T cells. The amount of PD-1 on exhausted CD8 T cells from different anatomical locations did not always correlate with infectious virus but did reflect viral antigen in some tissues. Moreover, lower expression of PD-L1 in some locations, such as the bone marrow, favored the survival of PD-1^Hi exhausted CD8 T cells, suggesting that some anatomical sites might provide a survival niche for subpopulations of exhausted CD8 T cells. Tissue-specific differences in the function of exhausted CD8 T cells were also observed. However, while cytokine production did not strictly correlate with the amount of PD-1 expressed by exhausted CD8 T cells from different tissues, the ability to degranulate and kill were tightly linked to PD-1 expression regardless of the anatomical location. These observations have implications for human chronic infections and for therapeutic interventions based on blockade of the PD-1 pathway.Chronic viral infections are often associated with CD8⁺ T-cell dysfunction (30). This dysfunction, termed exhaustion, includes defects in the ability to produce antiviral cytokines, poor cytotoxicity, a loss of antigen-independent self-renewal, and the inability to vigorously re-expand following antigen exposure (30). These functional deficiencies contrast with the highly functional memory CD8⁺ T cells that are generated after acute infection and maintained via interleukin-7 (IL-7)- and IL-15-mediated homeostatic proliferation (30). During chronic viral infections, T-cell exhaustion often correlates with poor control of viral replication (3, 8, 38, 39). Thus, there is considerable interest in developing strategies to reverse exhaustion and restore function in virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells during chronic infections.Recent studies have revealed an important role for the negative regulatory molecule PD-1 in CD8 T-cell exhaustion during chronic viral infections (29). PD-1, a member of the CD28/CTLA-4 family of costimulatory/coinhibitory receptors, contains both ITIM and ITSM motifs in the intracellular tail and can deliver negative signals, at least partly via recruitment of the phosphatase Shp-2 (29). A role for PD-1 in regulating T-cell responses to chronic viral infections was first observed using lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection of mice, where PD-1 was found to be highly expressed on exhausted CD8⁺ T cells from chronically infected animals but not on functional memory CD8⁺ T cells from mice that had cleared an acute strain of the virus (3). In vivo blockade of the PD-1 pathway led to a dramatic increase in the number of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells, improved functionality of these cells, and enhanced control of viral replication (3). These observations were extended to human chronic viral infections, and a series of studies have demonstrated that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-, and HBV-specific CD8⁺ T cells upregulate PD-1 in humans compared to CD8⁺ T cells specific for nonpersisting viruses such as influenza virus or vaccinia virus (6-8, 24, 26, 32, 33, 42). Increasing PD-1 expression also correlates with disease status during HIV infection (8, 42). In vitro blockade of PD-1-PD-L interactions can reinvigorate exhausted virus-specific T-cell responses in humans and appears to have a prominent impact on proliferative expansion and/or prevention of apoptosis in these cases (9, 24, 32). Finally, recent results from in vivo blockade in the macaque simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection model demonstrated the effectiveness of blocking PD-1 in primates during chronic viral infection (36). In these studies, PD-1 blockade enhanced virus-specific T and B-cell responses, lowered viral load, and improved the survival of chronically infected animals. Thus, PD-1 has emerged as not only a major regulator of T-cell exhaustion and viral control during chronic infection but also as an important potential therapeutic target.Despite these important studies and the clear impact of PD-1 blockade on the reversal of T-cell exhaustion, important questions remain. For example, previous work has demonstrated that PD-1 expression is not uniform on subsets of exhausted CD8 T cells (4). However, the expression of PD-1 on exhausted CD8 T cells in multiple tissues, and the relationship between PD-1 expression in these tissues to viral load, the PD-1 ligands and function has not been examined. Given the nonlymphoid accumulation of virus-specific CD8 T cells during chronic viral infections (11, 39) and the predilection of many important chronic infections for replicating in anatomically restricted locations (e.g., HCV and the liver, HIV and mucosal tissues, etc.), the dynamics of PD-1 expression by exhausted CD8 T cells outside the blood and spleen could have important therapeutic implications.In the present study we examined these issues using the mouse model of LCMV infection. Our results demonstrate that exhausted CD8 T cells have a wide range of PD-1 expression in different tissues of chronically infected mice. Virus-specific CD8 T cells in some anatomical locations such as the liver, brain, and bone marrow (BM) expressed high PD-1 for substantially longer than virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells from the spleens or blood of the same mice. Although PD-1 expression in the spleen correlated well with reduced gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) production, the PD-1^Hi virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells from the BM remained capable of producing antiviral cytokines ex vivo. In contrast, a strong negative correlation between PD-1 expression and cytotoxicity existed for exhausted CD8 T cells from all tissues tested. PD-L1 expression was high in the spleen, whereas in the BM antigen-presenting cell (APC) populations expressed lower amounts of PD-L1. Survival of PD-1^Hi CD8⁺ T cells from the BM was decreased in the presence of splenic APCs, suggesting that different tissue microenvironments in vivo could selectively support the persistence of PD-1^Hi exhausted CD8 T cells. Since PD-1 expression differs by anatomical location, these observations suggest that PD-1 blockade in vivo will have varying impacts on exhausted CD8 T cells from different tissues or anatomical locations. These observations have implications for human chronic infections such as HBV, HCV, and HIV.     

Efficacious Early Antiviral Activity of HIV Gag- and Pol-Specific HLA-B*2705-Restricted CD8+ T Cells

The association between HLA-B*2705 and the immune control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) has previously been linked to the targeting of the HLA-B*2705-restricted Gag epitope KRWIILGLNK (KK10) by CD8⁺ T cells. In order to better define the mechanisms of the HLA-B*2705 immune control of HIV, we first characterized the CD8⁺ T-cell responses of nine highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-naïve B*2705-positive subjects. Unexpectedly, we observed a strong response to an HLA-B*2705-restricted Pol epitope, KRKGGIGGY (KY9), in 8/9 subjects. The magnitude of the KY9 response was only marginally lower than that of the KK10-specific response (median, 695 versus 867 spot-forming cells [SFC]/million peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs]; not significant [NS]), and viral escape mutants were observed in both KY9 and KK10, resulting from selection pressure driven by the respective CD8⁺ T-cell response. By comparing inhibitions of viral replication by CD8⁺ T cells specific for the Gag KK10, Pol KY9, and Vpr VL9 HLA-B*2705-restricted epitopes, we observed a consistent hierarchy of antiviral efficacy (Gag KK10 > Pol KY9 > Vpr VL9). This hierarchy was associated with early recognition of HIV-1-infected cells, within 6 h of infection, by KK10- and KY9-specific CD8⁺ T cells but not until 18 h postinfection by VL9-specific CD8⁺ T cells. There was no association between antiviral efficacy and proliferative capacity, cytotoxicity, polyfunctionality, or T-cell receptor (TCR) avidity. These data are consistent with previous studies indicating an important role for the B*2705-Gag KK10 response in the control of HIV but also suggest a previously unrecognized role played by the subdominant Pol-specific KY9 response in HLA-B*2705-mediated control of HIV and that the recognition of HIV-infected cells by CD8⁺ T cells early in the viral life cycle may be important for viral containment in HIV-infected individuals.Current human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine strategies are focused on emulating the protective effect observed for HIV-infected individuals carrying alleles such as B*2705 by inducing the virus-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses that are thought to be responsible for delaying or preventing disease progression. Understanding why such alleles confer protection facilitates a rational approach to vaccine design. It has been hypothesized that the slow progression to AIDS exhibited by HLA-B*2705-positive (HLA-B*2705⁺) HIV-infected individuals is due to the immunodominant B*27-restricted CD8⁺ T-cell response toward the p24 Gag epitope KRWIILGLNK (KK10) (Gag residues 263 to 272). Escape from this epitope typically occurs late in infection and is associated with rapid progression to AIDS (14, 16). The commonly selected mutation R264K abrogates CD8⁺ T-cell recognition but also confers a substantial fitness cost to the virus, and the selection of compensatory mutations is required to restore viral replicative capacity (19, 29, 30). This has prompted the hypothesis that CD8⁺ T-cell responses that can drive escape mutations that reduce viral fitness are a contributing factor in the immune control of HIV, either by promoting the outgrowth of a viral quasispecies with a lower replicative capacity or by delaying the selection of escape mutations, both of which may slow the onset of AIDS (11, 21, 25).To better understand how CD8⁺ T cells can be most effective against HIV, recent studies have directly assessed the antiviral activity of CD8⁺ T cells via the viral suppression of HIV-infected CD4⁺ T cells during coculture. Such studies indicated that Gag-specific CD8⁺ T cells have a higher potency for viral suppression than Env-specific CD8⁺ T cells (10), supporting previous data indicating that broad CD8⁺ T-cell targeting of Gag epitopes was associated a with lower viral set point and, hence, slower progression to AIDS (20). A recent study of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) suggested that the protective effect of Gag-specific CD8⁺ T cells is mediated by the early presentation of Gag epitopes, processed from the viral Gag protein from incoming virions during infection, which can sensitize target cells for lysis by Gag-specific CD8⁺ T cells within 6 h of infection (26, 27). In addition, it was proposed previously that the ability of CD8⁺ T cells to secrete multiple cytokines may also be an important correlate of immune protection (6), and a further recent study demonstrated a more polyfunctional cytokine profile of Gag-specific B*2705-KK10 CD8⁺ T-cell responses than those of other HIV-specific CD8⁺ T-cell responses (1). The ability of CD8⁺ T cells to proliferate in response to the cognate epitope peptide has also been associated with immune control (1, 12). Other studies demonstrated the importance of lytic granule loading of CD8⁺ T cells for the effective elimination of HIV-infected cells (6, 22). However, the induction of a Gag KK10-specific CD8⁺ T-cell vaccine response in a B*2705-positive vaccinee did not protect against rapid progression following subsequent HIV-1 infection (5). This anecdotal case suggests the possibility that HLA-B*2705-associated immune control of HIV-1 may not be dependent on the Gag KK10-specific CD8⁺ T-cell response alone.Since current vaccine strategies hope to induce a protective effect, such as that observed for HLA-B*2705⁺ HIV-infected individuals, the study of the functional and phenotypic characteristics of B*2705-specific CD8⁺ T cells provides an opportunity to redefine the proposed correlates of immune protection essential for rational vaccine design. In this study we analyze three different specificities of HLA-B*2705-restricted CD8⁺ T cells from chronically HIV-infected individuals in order to directly compare antiviral activity with potential correlates of immune protection, including the kinetics of viral inhibition, cytokine profile, granzyme production, proliferative capacity, and cytotoxicity.