Comparative study of reaction centers from purple photosynthetic bacteria: Isolation and optical spectroscopy

Reaction centers from two species of purple bacteria, Rhodospirillum rubrum and Rhodospirillum centenum, have been characterized and compared to reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodobacter capsulatus. The reaction centers purified from these four species can be divided into two classes according to the spectral characteristics of the primary donor. Reaction centers from one class have a donor optical band at a longer wavelength, 865 nm compared to 850 nm, and an optical absorption band associated with the oxidized donor at 1250 nm that has a larger oscillator strength than reaction centers from the second class. Under normal buffering conditions, reaction centers isolated from Rb. sphaeroides and Rs. rubrum exhibit characteristics of the first class while those from Rb. capsulatus and Rs. centenum exhibit characteristics of the second class. However, the reaction centers can be converted between the two groups by the addition of charged detergents. Thus, the observed spectral differences are not due to intrinsic differences between reaction centers but represent changes in the electronic structure of the donor due to interactions with the detergents as has been confirmed by recent ENDOR measurements (Rautter J, Lendzian F, Lubitz W, Wang S and Allen JP (1994) Biochemistry 33: 12077–12084). The oxidation midpoint potential for the donor has values of 445 mV, 475 mV, 480 mV and 495 mV for Rs. rubrum, Rs. centenum, Rb. capsulatus, and Rb. sphaeroides, respectively. Despite this range of values for the midpoint potential, the decay rates of the stimulated emission are all fast with values of 4.1 ps, 4.5 ps. 5.5 ps and 6.1 ps for quinone-reduced RCs from Rs. rubrum, Rb. capsulatus, Rs. centenum, and Rb. sphaeroides, respectively. The general spectral features of the initial charge separated state are essentially the same for the four species, except for differences in the wavelengths of the absorption changes due to the different donor band positions. The pH dependence of the charge recombination rates from the primary and secondary quinones differ for reaction centers from the four species indicating different interactions between the quinones and ionizable residues. A different mechanism for charge recombination from the secondary quinone, that probably is direct recombination, is proposed for RCs from Rs. centenum.Abbreviations RC reaction center - P bacteriochlorophyll dimer - H bacteriopheophytin - Q quinone - Rb Rhodobacter - Rs Rhodospirillum - Rps Rhodopseudomonas - EDTA (ethylenediamine)tetraaceticacid - LDAO N,N-dimethyl-dodecylamine-N-oxide - CTAB cetyltrimethylammonium bromide - DOC deoxycholate - Tris Tris-(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane - ns nanosecond - ps picosecond - fs femtosecond     

Protein structure,electron transfer and evolution of prokaryotic photosynthetic reaction centers

Photosynthetic reaction centers from a variety of organisms have been isolated and characterized. The groups of prokaryotic photosynthetic organisms include the purple bacteria, the filamentous green bacteria, the green sulfur bacteria and the heliobacteria as anoxygenic representatives as well as the cyanobacteria and prochlorophytes as oxygenic representatives. This review focuses on structural and functional comparisons of the various groups of photosynthetic reaction centers and considers possible evolutionary scenarios to explain the diversity of existing photosynthetic organisms.Abbreviations BChl bacteriochlorophyll - Chl chlorophyll - Rb Rhodobacter - Rp Rhodopseudomonas     

Control of electron transfer by protein dynamics in photosynthetic reaction centers

Abstract

Trehalose and glycerol are low molecular mass sugars/polyols that have found widespread use in the protection of native protein states, in both short- and long-term storage of biological materials, and as a means of understanding protein dynamics. These myriad uses are often attributed to their ability to form an amorphous glassy matrix. In glycerol, the glass is formed only at cryogenic temperatures, while in trehalose, the glass is formed at room temperature, but only upon dehydration of the sample. While much work has been carried out to elucidate a mechanistic view of how each of these matrices interact with proteins to provide stability, rarely have the effects of these two independent systems been directly compared to each other. This review aims to compile decades of research on how different glassy matrices affect two types of photosynthetic proteins: (i) the Type II bacterial reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides and (ii) the Type I Photosystem I reaction center from cyanobacteria. By comparing aggregate data on electron transfer, protein structure, and protein dynamics, it appears that the effects of these two distinct matrices are remarkably similar. Both seem to cause a “tightening” of the solvation shell when in a glassy state, resulting in severely restricted conformational mobility of the protein and associated water molecules. Thus, trehalose appears to be able to mimic, at room temperature, nearly all of the effects on protein dynamics observed in low temperature glycerol glasses.     

Resolution of electron and proton transfer events in the electrochromism associated with quinone reduction in bacterial reaction centers

We have measured the electrochromic response of the bacteriopheophytin, BPh, and bacteriochlorophyll, BChl, cofactors during the Q_A ^–Q_B Q_AQ_B ^– electron transfer in chromatophores of Rhodobacter (Rb.) capsulatus and Rb. sphaeroides. The electrochromic response rises faster in chromatophores and is more clearly biexponential than it is in isolated reaction centers. The chromatophore spectra can be interpreted in terms of a clear kinetic separation between fast electron transfer and slower non-electron transfer events such as proton transfer or protein relaxation. The electrochromic response to electron transfer exhibits rise times of about 4 µs (70%) and 40 µs (30%) in Rb. capsulatus and 4 µs (60%) and 80 µs (40%) in Rb. sphaeroides. The BPh absorption band is shifted to nearly equivalent positions in the Q_A ^– and nascent Q_B ^– states, indicating that the electrochromic perturbation of BPh absorption from the newly formed Q_B ^– state is comparable to that of Q_A ^– . Subsequently, partial attenuation of the Q_B ^– electrochromism occurs with a time constant on the order of 200 µs. This can be attributed to partial charge compensation by H⁺ (or other counter ion) movement into the Q_B pocket. Electron transfer events were found to be slower in detergent isolated RCs than in chromatophores, more nearly monoexponential, and overlap H⁺ transfer, suggesting that a change in rate-limiting step has occurred upon detergent solubilization.     

Functional LH1 antenna complexes influence electron transfer in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers

The effect of the light harvesting 1 (LH1) antenna complex on the driving force for light-driven electron transfer in the Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center has been examined. Equilibrium redox titrations show that the presence of the LH1 antenna complex influences the free energy change for the primary electron transfer reaction through an effect on the reduction potential of the primary donor. A lowering of the redox potential of the primary donor due to the presence of the core antenna is consistently observed in a series of reaction center mutants in which the reduction potential of the primary donor was varied over a 130 mV range. Estimates of the magnitude of the change in driving force for charge separation from time-resolved delayed fluorescence measurements in the mutant reaction centers suggest that the mutations exert their effect on the driving force largely through an influence on the redox properties of the primary donor. The results demonstrate that the energetics of light-driven electron transfer in reaction centers are sensitive to the environment of the complex, and provide indirect evidence that the kinetics of electron transfer are modulated by the presence of the LH1 antenna complexes that surround the reaction center in the natural membrane.     

Vibronic coupling to electron transfer and the structure of the R. Viridis reaction center

This paper points out that the orientations of the porphyrins, bacteriochlorophyll and bacteriopheophytin, in the reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas viridis, as shown by the new X-ray determined structure, have a peculiar orientation towards each other: electron donors are broadside toward the acceptors and acceptors are edgeon toward donors. Vibronic coupling which is the mechanism of converting free-energy loss in electron transport to vibrational energy is examined as a possible explanation. Preliminary calculations do not support this as an explanation of the orientations but suggest strongly that the non-heme iron atom has the function of promoting vibronic coupling in the electron transfer from bacteriopheophytin to menaquinone. It is further suggested that the system of electron transport from the special pair of bacteriochlorophyll to the bacteriopheophytin is arranged to keep virbonic coupling to a minimum to match the very small electronic free-energy loss in this region.Abbreviations BC Bacteriochlorophyll - BP Bacteriopheophytin - BC₂ Bacteriochlorophyll special pair, primary electron donor - Fe Non-heme iron atom - MQ Menaquinone, first quinone acceptor - UQ Ubiquinone, second quinone acceptor     

Horizontal transfer of genes coding for the photosynthetic reaction centers of purple bacteria

Phylogenetic trees were drawn and analyzed based on the nucleotide sequences of the 1.5-kb gene fragment coding for the L and M subunits of the photochemical reaction center of various purple photosynthetic bacteria. These trees are mostly consistent with phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA and soluble cytochrome c, but differ in some significant details. This inconsistency implies horizontal transfer of the genes that code for the photosynthetic apparatus in purple bacteria. Possibilities of similar transfers of photosynthesis genes during the evolution of photosynthesis are discussed especially for the establishment of oxygenic photosynthesis. Received: 8 July 1996 / Accepted: 12 March 1997     

Femtosecond nuclear oscillations under charge separation in reaction centers of photosynthesis

Results are presented of a study of primary processes of formation of the charge separated states P⁺B_A ^- and P⁺H_A ^- (where P is the primary electron donor, B_A and H_A the primary and secondary electron acceptors) in native and pheophytin-modified reaction centers (RCs) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 by methods of femtosecond spectroscopy of absorption changes at low temperature. Coherent oscillations were studied in the kinetics at 935 nm (P* stimulated emission band), at 1020 nm (B_A ^- absorption band), and at 760 nm (H_A absorption band). It was found that when the wavepacket created under femtosecond light excitation approaches the intersection between P* and P⁺B_A ^- potential surfaces at 120- and 380-fsec delays, the formation of two electron states emitting light at 935 nm (P*) and absorbing light at 1020 nm (P⁺B_A ^-) takes place. At the later time the wavepacket motion has a frequency of 32 cm^-1 and is accompanied by electron transfer from P* to B_A in pheophytin-modified and native RCs and further to H_A in native RCs. It was shown that electron transfer processes monitored by the 1020-nm absorption band development as well as by bleaching of 760-nm absorption band have the enhanced 32 cm^-1 mode in the Fourier transform spectra.     

Reaction centers from three herbicide resistant mutants of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1: Kinetics of electron transfer reactions

Electron transfer rates were measured in RCs from three herbicide-resistant mutants with known amino acid changes to elucidate the structural requirements for last electron transfer. The three herbicide resistant mutants were IM(L229) (Ile-L229 Met), SP(L223) (Ser-L223 Pro) and YG(L222) (Tyr-L222 Gly). The electron transfer rate D⁺Q_A ^-Q_BD⁺Q_AQ_B (k _AB) is slowed 3 fold in the IM(L229) and YG(L222) RCs (pH 8). The stabilization of D⁺Q_AQ_B ^- with respect to D⁺Q_AQ_B ^- (pH 8) was found to be eliminated in the IM(L229) mutant RCs (G⁰ 0 meV), was partially reduced in the SP(L223) mutant RCs (G⁰=–30 meV), and was unaltered in the YG(L222) mutant RCs (G⁰=–60 meV), compared to that observed in the native RCs (G⁰=–60 meV). The pH dependences of the charge recombination rate D⁺Q_AQ_B ^-DQ_AQ_B (k _BD) and the electron transfer from Q_A ^- (k _QA ^-Q_A) suggest that the mutations do not affect the protonation state of Glu-L212 nor the electrostatic interactions of Q_B and Q_B ^- with Glu-L212. The binding affinities of UQ₁₀ for the Q_B site were found in order of decreasing values to be native IM(L229) > YG(L222) SP(L223). The altered properties of the mutant RCs are used to deduce possible structural changes caused by the mutations and are dicscussed in terms of photosynthetic efficiency of the herbicide resistant strains.Abbreviations Bchl bacteriochlorophyll - Bphe bacteriopheophytin - cholate 3,7,12-trihydroxycholanic acid - D donor (bacteriochlorophyll dimer) - EDTA ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid - Fe²⁺ non-heme iron atom - LDAO lauryl dimethylamine oxide - PS II photosystem II - Q_A and Q_B primary and secondary quinone acceptors - RC bacterial reaction center - Tris tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane - UQ₀ 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl benzoquinone - UQ₁₀ ubiquinone 50     

Flash-induced proton transfer in photosynthetic bacteria

A proton electrochemical potential across the membranes of photosynthetic purple bacteria is established by a light-driven proton pump mechanism: the absorbed light in the reaction center initiates electron transfer which is coupled to the vectorial displacement of protons from the cytoplasm to the periplasm. The stoichiometry and kinetics of proton binding and release can be tracked directly by electric (glass electrodes), spectrophotometric (pH indicator dyes) and conductimetric techniques. The primary step in the formation of the transmembrane chemiosmotic potential is the uptake of two protons by the doubly reduced secondary quinone in the reaction center and the subsequent exchange of hydroquinol for quinone from the membrane quinone-pool. However, the proton binding associated with singly reduced promary and/or secondary quinones of the reaction center is substoichiometric, pH-dependent and its rate is electrostatically enhanced but not diffusion limited. Molecular details of protonation are discussed based on the crystallographic structure of the reaction center of purple bacteriaRb. sphaeroides andRps. viridis, structure-based molecular (electrostatic) calculations and mutagenesis directed at protonatable amino acids supposed to be involved in proton conduction pathways.     

A new approach to experimental investigation of dynamic self-organization in reaction centers of purple bacteria

The results of a study of molecular self-organization processes in the reaction centers (RC) ofRb. Sphaeroides purple bacteria by the method of pulsed optical excitation is presented. The existence of a bistability domain for the parameters of RC recovery kinetics is shown. A good agreement between the theory and experimental results is obtained.     

Mechanisms of excitation trapping in reaction centers of purple bacteria

The contradiction between two groups of experimental data, which fails to be resolved within the framework of the widely accepted model of excitation migration and trapping (at least in case of purple bacteria), is discussed in the introduction to this review. Three directions of studies intended to resolve this conflict are reviewed in the three further sections: II. Exciton models; III. Water-polarization (water-latch) mechanism of excitation trapping; IV. Quantum-mechanical models. The maximum efficiency of these models in resolving the contradiction mentioned above was assessed. The advantages and disadvantages of the mechanisms described in sections II, III, and IV are discussed in the last section of this review. It is concluded that none of these mechanisms taken alone is able to solve this problem. Therefore, the fundamental problem of the primary excitation conversion in reaction centers remains unsolved and requires additional experimental research.     

Kinetic study of PF and CarT states in the LM subunit purified from the wild-type Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

The kinetics of absorbance changes related to the charge-separated state, P^F, and to the formation and decay of the carotenoid triplet state (Car^T) were studied in the LM reaction center subunit isolated from a wild-type strain of the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides (strain Y). The P^F lifetime is lengthened (20±1.5 ns) in the LM complex as compared to the intact reaction centers (11±1 ns). The yield of the carotenoid triplet formation is higher (0.28±0.01) in the LM complex than in native reaction centers. We interpret our results in terms of perturbations of a first-order reaction connecting the singlet and the triplet state of the radical-pair state. Our results, together with those of a recent work (Agalidis, I., Nuijs, A.M. and Reiss-Husson, F. (1987) Biochim. Biophys. Acta (in press)) are consistent with a high I to Q_A electron transfer rate in this LM subunit, which is metal-depleted.The LM complex is considerably more sensitive than the reaction centers to photooxidative damage in the presence of oxygen. This is not readily accounted for simply by the higher carotenoid triplet yield, and may suggest a greater accessibility of the internal structures in the absence of the H-subunit.The lifetime of the carotenoid triplet decay (6.4±0.3 s) in the LM subunit is unchanged compared to the native reaction centers.Abbreviations BChl bacteriochlorophyll - Bph bacteriopheophytin - Car carotenoid - Chl chlorophyll - cyt cytochrome - L, M and H subunits light, medium and heavy subunits of the reaction center complex - P^R triplet electronic state of the primary electron donor - P; Q_A the first stable electron acceptor, a bound quinone - RC reaction center - LDAO lauryldimethylamine N-oxide - SDS sodium dodecyl sulfate - UQ ubiquinone This paper is published in our new format. All future authors are requested to follow our new instructions (see Photosynthesis Research 10:519–526, 1986)—Editor.     

Reaction centers from three herbicide-resistant mutants of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1: sequence analysis and preliminary characterization

Many herbicides that inhibit photosynthesis in plants also inhibit photosynthesis in bacteria. We have isolated three mutants of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides that were selected for increased resistance to the herbicide terbutryne. All three mutants also showed increased resistance to the known electron transfer inhibitor o-phenanthroline. The primary structures of the mutants were determined by recombinant DNA techniques. All mutations were located on the gene coding for the L-subunit resulting in these changes Ile²²⁹ Met, Ser²²³ Pro and Tyr²²² Gly. The mutations of Ser²²³ is analogous to the mutation of Ser²⁶⁴ in the D1 subunit of photosystem II in green plants, strengthening the functional analogy between D1 and the bacterial L-subunit. The changed amino acids of the mutant strains form part of the binding pocket for the secondary quinone, Q _b . This is consistent with the idea that the herbicides are competitive inhibitors for the Q _b binding site. The reaction centers of the mutants were characterized with respect to electron transfer rates, inhibition constants of terbutryne and o-phenanthroline, and binding constants of the quinone UQ₀ and the inhibitors. By correlating these results with the three-dimensional structure obtained from x-ray analysis by Allen et al. (1987a, 1987b), the likely positions of o-phenanthroline and terbutryne were deduced. These correspond to the positions deduced by Michel et al. (1986a) for Rhodopseudomonas viridis.Abbreviations ATP adenosine 5-triphosphate - Bchl bacteriochlorophyll - Bphe bacteriopheophytin - bp basepair - cyt c²⁺ reduced form of cytochrome c - DEAE diethylami-noethyl - EDTA ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid - Fe²⁺ non-heme iron atom - LDAO lauryl dimethylamine oxide - Pipes piperazine-N,N-bis-2-ethane-sulfonic acid - PSII photosystem II - RC reaction center - SDS sodium dodecylsulfate - Tris tris(hydroxy-methyl)aminomethane - UQ₀ 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl benzoquinone - UQ₁₀ ubiquinone 50     

Characterization of a semi-stable,charge-separated state in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, subjected to continuous illumination in the presence of an inhibitor of the Q_A to Q_B electron transfer, the oxidation of P870 consisted of several kinetic phases with a fast initial reaction followed by very slow accumulation of P870⁺ with a halftime of several minutes. When the light was turned off, a phase of fast charge recombination was followed by an equally slow reduction of P870⁺. In reaction centers depleted of Q_B, where forward electron transfer from Q_A is also prevented, the slow reactions were also observed but with different kinetic properties. The kinetic traces of accumulation and decay of P870⁺ could be fitted to a simple three-state model where the initial, fast charge separation is followed by a slow reversible conversion to a long-lived, charge-stabilized state. Spectroscopic examination of the charge-separated, semi-stable state, using optical absorbance and EPR spectroscopy, suggests that the unpaired electron on the acceptor side is located in an environment significantly different from normal. The activation parameters and enthalpy and entropy changes, determined from the temperature dependence of the slow conversion reaction, suggest that this might be coupled to changes in the protein structure of the reaction centers, supporting the spectroscopic results. One model that is consistent with the present observations is that reaction centers, after the primary charge separation, undergo a slow, light-induced change in conformation affecting the acceptor side. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Dielectric and photoelectric properties of photosynthetic reaction centers

A brief review of studies of dielectric and photoelectric properties of photosynthetic reaction centers of purple bacteria as well as photosystem I and photosystem II of cyanobacteria and higher plants is given. A simple kinetic model of the primary processes of electron transfer in photosynthesis is used to discuss possible mechanisms of correlation between rate constant of charge transfer reaction, free energy of electron transition, and effective dielectric constant in the locus of corresponding carriers.Translated from Biokhimiya, Vol. 70, No. 2, 2005, pp. 315–322.Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Chamorovsky, Chamorovsky, Semenov.This revised version was published online in April 2005 with corrections to the post codes.     

Electron transfer in deuterated reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides at 90 K according to femtosecond spectroscopy data

The primary act of charge separation was studied in P⁺B_A ^– and P⁺H_A ^– states (P, primary electron donor; B_A and H_A, primary and secondary electron acceptor) of native reaction centers (RCs) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 using femtosecond absorption spectroscopy at low (90 K) and room temperature. Coherent oscillations were studied in the kinetics of the stimulated emission band of P* (935 nm), of absorption band of B_A ^– (1020 nm) and of absorption band of H_A (760 nm). It was found that in native RCs kept in heavy water (D₂O) buffer the isotopic decreasing of basic oscillation frequency 32 cm ^–1 and its overtones takes place by the same factor 1.3 in the 935, 1020, and 760 nm bands in comparison with the samples in ordinary water H₂O. This suggests that the femtosecond oscillations in RC kinetics with 32 cm ^–1 frequency may be caused by rotation of hydrogen-containing groups, in particular the water molecule which may be placed between primary electron donor P_B and primary electron acceptor B_A. This rotation may appear also as high harmonics up to sixth in the stimulated emission of P*. The rotation of the water molecule may modulate electron transfer from P* to B_A. The results allow for tracing of the possible pathway of electron transfer from P* to B_A along a chain consisting of polar atoms according to the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank (1PRC): Mg(P_B)-N-C-N(His M200)-HOH-O = B_A. We assume that the role of 32-cm ^–1 modulation in electron transfer along this chain consists of a fixation of electron density at B_A ^– during a reversible electron transfer, when populations of P* and P⁺B_A ^– states are approximately equal.     

Electron transfer in reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodobacter capsulatus monitored by fluorescence of the bacteriochlorophyll dimer

Spectral and kinetic characteristics of fluorescence from isolated reaction centers of photosynthetic purple bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodobacter capsulatus were measured at room temperature under rectangular shape of excitation at 810 nm. The kinetics of fluorescence at 915 nm reflected redox changes due to light and dark reactions in the donor and acceptor quinone complex of the reaction center as identified by absorption changes at 865 nm (bacteriochlorophyll dimer) and 450 nm (quinones) measured simultaneously with the fluorescence. Based on redox titration and gradual bleaching of the dimer, the yield of fluorescence from reaction centers could be separated into a time-dependent (originating from the dimer) and a constant part (coming from contaminating pigment (detached bacteriochlorin)). The origin was also confirmed by the corresponding excitation spectra of the 915 nm fluorescence. The ratio of yields of constant fluorescence over variable fluorescence was much smaller in Rhodobacter sphaeroides (0.15±0.1) than in Rhodobacter capsulatus (1.2±0.3). It was shown that the changes in fluorescence yield reflected the disappearance of the dimer and the quenching by the oxidized primary quinone. The redox changes of the secondary quinone did not have any influence on the yield but excess quinone in the solution quenched the (constant part of) fluorescence. The relative yields of fluorescence in different redox states of the reaction center were tabulated. The fluorescence of the dimer can be used as an effective tool in studies of redox reactions in reaction centers, an alternative to the measurements of absorption kinetics.Abbreviations Bchl bacteriochlorophyll - Bpheo bacteriopheophytin - D electron donor to P⁺ - P bacteriochlorophyll dimer - Q quinone acceptor - Q_A primary quinone acceptor - Q_B secondary quinone acceptor - RC reaction center protein - UQ₆ ubiquinone-30     

Conservation of distantly related membrane proteins: photosynthetic reaction centers share a common structural core

Photosynthesis was established on Earth more than 3 billion years ago. All available evidences suggest that the earliest photosynthetic organisms were anoxygenic and that oxygen-evolving photosynthesis is a more recent development. The reaction center complexes that form the heart of the energy storage process are integral membrane pigment proteins that span the membrane in vectorial fashion to carry out electron transfer. The origin and extent of distribution of these proteins has been perplexing from a phylogenetic point of view mostly because of extreme sequence divergence. A series of integral membrane proteins of known structure and varying degrees of sequence identity have been compared using combinatorial extension-Monte Carlo methods. The proteins include photosynthetic reaction centers from proteobacteria and cyanobacterial photosystems I and II, as well as cytochrome oxidase, bacteriorhodopsin, and cytochrome b. The reaction center complexes show a remarkable conservation of the core structure of 5 transmembrane helices, strongly implying common ancestry, even though the residual sequence identity is less than 10%, whereas the other proteins have structures that are unrelated. A relationship of sequence with structure was derived from the reaction center structures; with characteristic decay length of 1.6 A. Phylogenetic trees derived from the structural alignments give insights into the earliest photosynthetic reaction center, strongly suggesting that it was a homodimeric complex that did not evolve oxygen.     

The photosynthetic reaction centre from the purple bacteriumRhodopseudomonas viridis

We first describe the history and methods of membrane protein crystallization, and show how the structure of the photosynthetic reaction centre from the purple bacteriumRhodopseudomonas viridis was solved. The structure of this membrane protein complex is correlated with its function as a light-driven electron pump across the photosynthetic membrane. Finally we draw conclusions on the structure of the photosystem II reaction centre from plants and discuss the aspects of membrane protein structure.Published inLes Prix Nobel—The Nobel Prizes 1988 (Nobel Foundation, Stockholm, 1989) and republished here with the permission of the Nobel Foundation the copyright holders.