Structural basis for androgen receptor interdomain and coactivator interactions suggests a transition in nuclear receptor activation function dominance

The androgen receptor (AR) is required for male sex development and contributes to prostate cancer cell survival. In contrast to other nuclear receptors that bind the LXXLL motifs of coactivators, the AR ligand binding domain is preferentially engaged in an interdomain interaction with the AR FXXLF motif. Reported here are crystal structures of the ligand-activated AR ligand binding domain with and without bound FXXLF and LXXLL peptides. Key residues that establish motif binding specificity are identified through comparative structure-function and mutagenesis studies. A mechanism in prostate cancer is suggested by a functional AR mutation at a specificity-determining residue that recovers coactivator LXXLL motif binding. An activation function transition hypothesis is proposed in which an evolutionary decline in LXXLL motif binding parallels expansion and functional dominance of the NH(2)-terminal transactivation domain in the steroid receptor subfamily.     

Characterization of receptor-interacting protein 140 in retinoid receptor activities.

Receptor-interacting protein 140 (RIP140) contains multiple receptor interaction domains and interacts with retinoic acid receptors in a ligand-dependent manner. Nine LXXLL receptor-interacting motifs are organized into two clusters within this molecule, each differentially interacting with retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and retinoid X receptor (RXR). RAR interacts with the 5' cluster, whereas RXR interacts with both clusters. Additionally, a third ligand-dependent receptor-interacting domain is assigned to the very C terminus of this molecule, which contains no LXXLL motif. In mammalian cells, receptor heterodimerization is required for efficient interaction of RAR/RXR with RIP140. Furthermore, the heterodimeric, holoreceptors cooperatively interact with RIP140, which requires the activation function 2 domains of both receptors. By using different retinoic acid reporter systems, it is demonstrated that RIP140 strongly suppresses retinoic acid induction of reporter activities, but coactivator SRC-1 enhances it. Furthermore, an intrinsic repressive activity of RIP140 is demonstrated in a GAL4 fusion system. Unlike receptor corepressor, which interacts with antagonist-bound RAR/RXRs, RIP140 does not interact with antagonist-occupied RAR/RXR dimers. These data suggest that RIP140 represents a third coregulator category that is able to suppress the activation of certain agonist-bound hormone receptors.     

Ligand and coactivator identity determines the requirement of the charge clamp for coactivation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma

The activation function 2 (AF-2)-dependent recruitment of coactivator is essential for gene activation by nuclear receptors. We show that the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) (NR1C3) coactivator-1 (PGC-1) requires both the intact AF-2 domain of PPARgamma and the LXXLL domain of PGC-1 for ligand-dependent and ligand-independent interaction and coactivation. Although the AF-2 domain of PPARgamma is absolutely required for PGC-1-mediated coactivation, this coactivator displayed a unique lack of requirement for the charge clamp of the ligand-binding domain of the receptor that is thought to be essential for LXXLL motif recognition. The mutation of a single serine residue adjacent to the core LXXLL motif of PGC-1 led to restoration of the typical charge clamp requirement. Thus, the unique structural features of the PGC-1 LXXLL motif appear to mediate an atypical mode of interaction with PPARgamma. Unexpectedly, we discovered that various ligands display variability in terms of their requirement for the charge clamp of PPARgamma for coactivation by PGC-1. This ligand-selective variable requirement for the charge clamp was coactivator-specific. Thus, distinct structural determinants, which may be unique for a particular ligand, are utilized by the receptor to recognize the coactivator. Our data suggest that even subtle differences in ligand structure are perceived by the receptor and translated into a unique display of the coactivator-binding surface of the ligand-binding domain, allowing for differential recognition of coactivators that may underlie distinct pharmacological profiles observed for ligands of a particular nuclear receptor.     

TR surfaces and conformations required to bind nuclear receptor corepressor

Residues of the TR that are critical for binding the nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) were identified by testing more than 100 separate mutations of the full-length human TRbeta that scan the surface of its ligand binding domain. The primary inferred interaction surface overlaps the surface described for binding of p160 coactivators, but differs by extending to a novel site underneath which helix 12 rests in the liganded TR, rather than including residues of helix 12. Nonconservative mutations of this surface diminished binding similarly to three isolated N-CoR receptor interaction domains (RIDs), but conservative mutations affected binding variably, consistent with a role for this surface in RID selectivity. The commonality of this surface in binding N-CoR was confirmed for the RXRs and ERs. Deletion of helix 12 increased N-CoR binding by the TR modestly, and by the RXR and ER to a much greater extent, indicating a competition between this helix and the corepressor that regulates the extent of corepressor binding by nuclear receptors. When helix 12 was deleted, N-CoR binding by the ER was stimulated by tamoxifen, and binding by the TR was stimulated by Triac, indicating that helix 12 is not the only feature that regulates corepressor binding. Two additional mutationsensitive surfaces were found alongside helix 1, near the previously described CoR box, and above helix 11, nearby but separate from residues that help link receptor in dimers. Based on effects of selected mutations on T(3) and coactivator binding, and on results of combined mutations of the three sites on corepressor binding, we propose that the second and third surfaces stabilize TR unliganded conformation(s) required for efficient N-CoR binding. In transfection assays mutations of all three surfaces impaired the corepressor-mediated functions of unliganded TR repression or activation. These detailed mapping results suggest approaches for selective modulation of corepressor interaction that include the shape of the molecular binding surface, the competitive occupancy by helix 12, pharmacological stimulation, and specific conformational stabilization.