Role of the GABA(A)beta2, GABA(A)alpha6, GABA(A)alpha1 and GABA(A)gamma2 receptor subunit genes cluster in drug responses and the development of alcohol dependence

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter of the central nervous system and it acts at the GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors. A possible role for the GABA(A) receptors in alcohol action has been derived from in vitro cell models, animal studies and human research. GABA(A) subunit mRNA expression in cell models has suggested that the long form of the gamma2 subunit is essential for ethanol enhanced potentiation of GABA(A) receptors, by phosphorylation of a serine contained within the extra eight amino acids. Several animal studies have demonstrated that alterations in drug and alcohol responses may be caused by amino-acid differences at the GABA(A)alpha6 and GABA(A)gamma2 subunits. An Arg(100)/Glu(100) change at the GABA(A)alpha6 subunit conferring altered binding efficacy of the benzodiazepine inverse agonist Ro 15-4513, was found between the AT (alcohol tolerance) and ANT (alcohol non-tolerance) rats. Several loci related to alcohol withdrawal on mouse chromosome 11 which corresponds to the region containing four GABA(A) subunit (beta2, alpha6, alpha1 and gamma2) genes on human chromosome 5q33-34, were also identified. Gene knockout studies of the role of GABA(A)alpha6 and GABA(A)gamma2 subunit genes in mice have demonstrated an essential role in the modulation of other GABA(A) subunit expression and the efficacy of benzodiazepine binding. Absence of the GABA(A)gamma2 subunit gene has more severe effects with many of the mice dying shortly after birth. Disappointingly few studies have examined the effects of response to alcohol in these gene knockout mice. Human genetic association studies have suggested that the GABA(A)beta2, alpha6, alpha1 and gamma2 subunit genes have a role in the development of alcohol dependence, although their contributions may vary between ethnic group and phenotype. In summary, in vitro cell, animal and human genetic association studies have suggested that the GABA(A)beta2, alpha6, alpha1 and gamma2 subunit genes have an important role in alcohol related phenotypes (300 words).     

Single- and multilocus allelic variants within the GABA(B) receptor subunit 2 (GABAB2) gene are significantly associated with nicotine dependence

Twelve single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the human gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptor subunit 2 gene (GABAB2) were tested for association with nicotine dependence (ND) in an extensively phenotyped cohort of 1,276 smokers and nonsmokers, representing approximately 404 nuclear families of African American (AA) or European American (EA) origin. The GABAB2 gene encodes a subunit of the GABA(B) receptor for GABA, an inhibitory neurotransmitter involved in the regulation of many physiological and psychological processes in the brain. The gene is located within a region of chromosome 9q22 that showed a "suggestive" linkage to ND. Individual SNP analysis performed using the PBAT-GEE program indicated that two SNPs in the AAs and four SNPs in the EAs were significantly associated with ND. Haplotype analysis using the Family-Based Association Test revealed that, even after Bonferroni correction, the haplotype C-C-G of rs2491397-rs2184026-rs3750344 had a significant positive association with ND in both the pooled and the AA samples. In the EAs, we identified two haplotypes, C-A-C-A and T-A-T-A, formed by SNPs rs1435252-rs378042-rs2779562-rs3750344, that showed a highly significant negative and positive association with ND, respectively. In summary, our findings provide evidence of a significant association of GABAB2 variants with ND, implying that this gene plays an important role in the etiology of this drug addiction.     

Editing modifies the GABA(A) receptor subunit alpha3

Adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) pre-mRNA editing by the ADAR enzyme family has the potential to increase the variety of the proteome. This editing by adenosine deamination is essential in mammals for a functional brain. To detect novel substrates for A-to-I editing we have used an experimental method to find selectively edited sites and combined it with bioinformatic techniques that find stem-loop structures suitable for editing. We present here the first verified editing candidate detected by this screening procedure. We show that Gabra-3, which codes for the alpha3 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor, is a substrate for editing by both ADAR1 and ADAR2. Editing of the Gabra-3 mRNA recodes an isoleucine to a methionine. The extent of editing is low at birth but increases with age, reaching close to 100% in the adult brain. We therefore propose that editing of the Gabra-3 mRNA is important for normal brain development.     

Two conserved arginines in the extracellular N-terminal domain of the GABA(A) receptor alpha(5) subunit are crucial for receptor function

The gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) binding pocket within the GABA(A) receptor complex has been suggested to contain arginine residues. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis by mutating arginine residues potentially contributing to the formation of a GABA binding pocket. Thus, six arginines conserved in human GABA(A) receptor alpha subunits (arginine 34, 70, 77, 123, 135, and 224) as well as two nonconserved arginines (79 and 190), all located in the extracellular N-terminal segment of the alpha(5) subunit, were substituted by lysines. The individual alpha(5) subunit mutants were coexpressed with human beta(2) and gamma(2s) GABA(A) receptor subunits in Chinese hamster ovary cells by transient transfection. Electrophysiological whole-cell patch-clamp recordings show that, of the eight arginine residues tested, the two arginines at positions 70 and 123 appear to be essential for the GABA-gated chloride current because the EC(50) values of the two mutant constructs increase >100-fold compared with the wild-type alpha(5),beta(2), gamma(2s) GABA(A) receptor. However, diazepam and allopregnanolone modulation and pentobarbital stimulation properties are unaffected by the introduction of lysines at positions 70 and 123. A double mutant carrying lysine substitutions at positions 70 and 123 is virtually insensitive to GABA, suggesting alterations of one or more GABA binding sites.     

A fragment of recombinant GABA(A) receptor alpha1 subunit forming rosette-like homo-oligomers

The type A gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptor plays a major role in inhibitory synaptic transmission in the central nervous system. A fragment consisting of residues Cys166 to Leu296 of the alpha1 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor was overexpressed in Escherichia coli and was found to have stable beta-rich structures. Here, results from laser scattering, gel electrophoresis and electron microscopy demonstrated that this recombinant protein formed rosette-like homo-oligomers, mainly pentamers in solution. Therefore, the fragment apparently provides a valuable model system for studying the pentameric holoreceptor assembly. Non-reducing sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the fragment showed that disulfide bonds formed between monomers contributed to the oligomerization of the fragment. The fact that this fragment alone could form pentamers in vitro strongly suggests that amino acid residues located within the Cys166-Leu296 region of the alpha1 subunit may contribute to the oligomerization of GABA(A) receptor in vivo.     

Identification of channel-lining residues in the M2 membrane-spanning segment of the GABA(A) receptor alpha1 subunit

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptors are the major inhibitory, postsynaptic, neurotransmitter receptors in the central nervous system. The binding of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) to the GABA(A) receptors induces the opening of an anion-selective channel that remains open for tens of milliseconds before it closes. To understand how the structure of the GABA(A) receptor determines the functional properties such as ion conduction, ion selectivity and gating we sought to identify the amino acid residues that line the ion conducting channel. To accomplish this we mutated 26 consecutive residues (250-275), one at a time, in and flanking the M2 membrane- spanning segment of the rat alpha1 subunit to cysteine. We expressed the mutant alpha1 subunit with wild-type beta1 and gamma2 subunits in Xenopus oocytes. We probed the accessibility of the engineered cysteine to covalent modification by charged, sulfhydryl-specific reagents added extracellularly. We assume that among residues in membrane-spanning segments, only those lining the channel would be susceptible to modification by polar reagents and that such modification would irreversibly alter conduction through the channel. We infer that nine of the residues, alpha1 Val257, alpha1 Thr26l, alpha1 Thr262, alpha1 Leu264, alpha1 Thr265, alpha1 Thr268, alpha1 Ile27l, alpha1 Ser272 and alpha1 Asn275 are exposed in the channel. On a helical wheel plot, the exposed residues, except alpha1 Thr262, lie on one side of the helix in an arc of 120 degrees. We infer that the M2 segment forms an alpha helix that is interrupted in the region of alpha1 Thr262. The modification of residues as cytoplasmic as alpha1 Val257 in the closed state of the channel suggests that the gate is at least as cytoplasmic as alpha1 Val257. The ability of the positively charged reagent methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium to reach the level of alpha1 Thr261 suggests that the charge-selectivity filter is at least as cytoplasmic as this residue.     

Mutagenesis of the GABA(A) receptor alpha1 subunit reveals a domain that affects sensitivity to GABA and benzodiazepine-site ligands

We have mutated several amino acids in the region of the GABA(A) receptor alpha1 subunit predicted to form a small extracellular loop between transmembrane domains two and three to investigate its possible role in ligand sensitivity. The mutations were S275T, L276A, P277A, V279A, A280S and Y281F. Mutant alpha1 subunits were co-expressed with beta2 and gamma2 subunits in tsA201 cells or Xenopus oocytes. Binding studies revealed that the only mutation that significantly affected [3H]Ro15-4513 binding was the V279A substitution which reduced the affinity for this ligand. Electrophysiological examination of mutant receptors revealed that L276A, P277A and V279A displayed rightward shifts of their GABA concentration-response curves, the largest occurring with the L276A mutant. The impact of these mutations on allosteric modulation by benzodiazepine-site ligands was examined. V279A reduced the potency of both flunitrazepam and Ro15-4513 but, in each case, their efficacy was enhanced. A280S resulted in a decrease in flunitrazepam efficacy without affecting its potency. Additionally, P277A and A280S resulted in Ro15-4513 losing its inverse agonist effect at these receptors. These results suggest that a domain within this small extracellular loop between TMII-TMIII plays a role in determining the sensitivity of GABA(A) receptors to both GABA and benzodiazepine-site ligands.     

Two beta-rich structural domains in GABA(A) receptor alpha(1) subunit with different physical properties: Evidence for multidomain nature of the receptor

The type A gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(A)) receptor is a major inhibitory neurotransmitter-gated ion channel. Previously, we identified a membrane-proximal beta-rich (MPBR) domain in fragment C166-L296 of GABA(A) receptor alpha(1) subunit, forming nativelike pentamers. In the present study, another structural domain, the amino-terminal domain, was shown to exist in the fragment Q28-E165. The secondary structures of both fragments were beta-rich as measured using FTIR spectroscopy and estimated from the CD spectra to be 42% and 51% beta-strand for Q28-E165 and C166-L296, respectively. The CD spectrum of the combined fragment Q28-L296 was additive of the spectra of the two fragments. In addition, denaturation curves of both fragments were characteristic of cooperative transitions, supporting their domainlike nature. C166-L296 required 6.5 M of guanidine chloride for total denaturation, therefore it is extraordinarily stable, more so than Q28-E165. Moreover, effects of detergent on the molecular masses of Q28-E165 and C166-L296, as monitored using laser-scattering spectroscopy, indicated that intermolecular interactions were much more significant in C166-L296 than in Q28-E165. Effects of pH on their molecular masses suggested that ionic forces were involved in these interactions. Together the results show that the two adjacent fragments form independent folding units, MPBR and amino-terminal domains, different in secondary structure content, denaturation profile, and polymerization status, and suggest that the former may play a more important role in receptor assembly and that the extraordinary stability may underlie its intrinsic tendency to form oligomers. More significantly, the present study has provided direct evidence for the long-postulated multidomain nature of this family of receptors.     

Two invariant tryptophans on the alpha1 subunit define domains necessary for GABA(A) receptor assembly.

Two invariant tryptophan residues on the N-terminal extracellular region of the rat alpha1 subunit, Trp-69 and Trp-94, are critical for the assembly of the GABA(A) (gamma-aminobutyric acid, type A) receptor into a pentamer. These tryptophans are common not only to all GABA(A) receptor subunits, but also to all ligand-gated ion channel subunits. Converting each Trp residue to Phe and Gly by site-directed mutagenesis allowed us to study the role of these invariant tryptophan residues. Mutant alpha1 subunits, coexpressed with beta2 subunits in baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells, displayed high affinity binding to [(3)H]muscimol, a GABA site ligand, but no binding to [(35)S]t-butyl bicyclophosphorothionate, a ligand for the receptor-associated ion channel. Neither [(3)H]muscimol binding to intact cells nor immunostaining of nonpermeabilized cells gave evidence of surface expression of the receptor. When expressed with beta2 and gamma2 polypeptides, the mutant alpha1 polypeptides did not form [(3)H]flunitrazepam binding sites though wild-type alpha1 polypeptides did. The distribution of the mutant receptors on sucrose gradients suggests that the effects on ligand binding result from the inability of the mutant alpha1 subunits to form pentamers. We conclude that Trp-69 and Trp-94 participate in the formation of the interface between alpha and beta subunits, but not of the GABA binding site.     

Prevalence between different alpha subunits performing the benzodiazepine binding sites in native heterologous GABA(A) receptors containing the alpha2 subunit

The presence of two heterologous alpha subunits and a single benzodiazepine binding site in the GABA(A) receptor implicates the existence of pharmacologically active and inactive alpha subunits. This fact raises the question of whether a particular alpha subtype could predominate performing the benzodiazepine binding site. The hippocampal formation expresses high levels of alpha subunits with different benzodiazepine binding properties (alpha1, alpha2 and alpha5). Thus, we first demonstrated the existence of alpha2-alpha1 (36.3 +/- 5.2% of the alpha2 population) and alpha2-alpha5 (20.2 +/- 2.1%) heterologous receptors. A similar alpha2-alpha1 association was observed in cortex. This association allows the direct comparison of the pharmacological properties of heterologous native GABA(A) receptors containing a common (alpha2) and a different (alpha1 or alpha5) alpha subunit. The alpha2 subunit pharmacologically prevailed over the alpha1 subunit in both cortex and hippocampus (there was an absence of high-affinity binding sites for Cl218,872, zolpidem and [3H]zolpidem). This prevalence was directly probed by zolpidem displacement experiments in alpha2-alpha1 double immunopurified receptors (K(i) = 295 +/- 56 nM and 200 +/- 8 nM in hippocampus and cortex, respectively). On the contrary, the alpha5 subunit pharmacologically prevailed over the alpha2 subunit (low- and high-affinity binding sites for zolpidem and [3H]L-655,708, respectively). This prevalence was probed in alpha2-alpha5 double immunopurified receptors. Zolpidem displayed a single low-affinity binding site (K(i) = 1.73 +/- 0.54 microM). These results demonstrated the existence of a differential dominance between the different alpha subunits performing the benzodiazepine binding sites in the native GABA(A) receptors.     

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and pentobarbital induce different conformational rearrangements in the GABA A receptor alpha1 and beta2 pre-M1 regions

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) binding to GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) triggers conformational movements in the alpha(1) and beta(2) pre-M1 regions that are associated with channel gating. At high concentrations, the barbiturate pentobarbital opens GABA(A)R channels with similar conductances as GABA, suggesting that their open state structures are alike. Little, however, is known about the structural rearrangements induced by barbiturates. Here, we examined whether pentobarbital activation triggers movements in the GABA(A)R pre-M1 regions. Alpha(1)beta(2) GABA(A)Rs containing cysteine substitutions in the pre-M1 alpha(1) (K219C, K221C) and beta(2) (K213C, K215C) subunits were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and analyzed using two-electrode voltage clamp. The cysteine substitutions had little to no effect on GABA and pentobarbital EC(50) values. Tethering chemically diverse thiol-reactive methanethiosulfonate reagents onto alpha(1)K219C and alpha(1)K221C affected GABA- and pentobarbital-activated currents differently, suggesting that the pre-M1 structural elements important for GABA and pentobarbital current activation are distinct. Moreover, pentobarbital altered the rates of cysteine modification by methanethiosulfonate reagents differently than GABA. For alpha(1)K221Cbeta(2) receptors, pentobarbital decreased the rate of cysteine modification whereas GABA had no effect. For alpha(1)beta(2)K215C receptors, pentobarbital had no effect whereas GABA increased the modification rate. The competitive GABA antagonist SR-95531 and a low, non-activating concentration of pentobarbital did not alter their modification rates, suggesting that the GABA- and pentobarbital-mediated changes in rates reflect gating movements. Overall, the data indicate that the pre-M1 region is involved in both GABA- and pentobarbital-mediated gating transitions. Pentobarbital, however, triggers different movements in this region than GABA, suggesting their activation mechanisms differ.     

Molecular determinants of desensitization and assembly of the chimeric GABA(A) receptor subunits (alpha1/gamma2) and (gamma2/alpha1) in combinations with beta2 and gamma2

Two gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptor chimeras were designed in order to elucidate the structural requirements for GABA(A) receptor desensitization and assembly. The (alpha1/gamma2) and (gamma2/alpha1) chimeric subunits representing the extracellular N-terminal domain of alpha1 or gamma2 and the remainder of the gamma2 or alpha1 subunits, respectively, were expressed with beta2 and beta2gamma2 in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf-9) cells using the baculovirus expression system. The (alpha1/gamma2)beta2 and (alpha1/gamma2)beta2gamma2 but not the (gamma2/alpha1)beta2 and (gamma2/alpha1)beta2gamma2 subunit combinations formed functional receptor complexes as shown by whole-cell patch-clamp recordings and [3H]muscimol and [3H]flunitrazepam binding. Moreover, the surface immunofluorescence staining of Sf-9 cells expressing the (alpha1/gamma2)-containing receptors was pronounced, as opposed to the staining of the (gamma2/alpha1)-containing receptors, which was only slightly higher than background. To explain this, the (alpha1/gamma2) and (gamma2/alpha1) chimeras may act like alpha1 and gamma2 subunits, respectively, indicating that the extracellular N-terminal segment is important for assembly. However, the (alpha1/gamma2) chimeric subunit had characteristics different from the alpha1 subunit, since the (alpha1/gamma2) chimera gave rise to no desensitization after GABA stimulation in whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, which was independent of whether the chimera was expressed in combination with beta2 or beta2gamma2. Surprisingly, the (alpha1/gamma2)(gamma2/alpha1)beta2 subunit combination did desensitize, indicating that the C-terminal segment of the alpha1 subunit may be important for desensitization. Moreover, desensitization was observed for the (alpha1/gamma2)beta2gamma2 receptor with respect to the direct activation by pentobarbital. This suggests differences in the mechanism of channel activation for pentobarbital and GABA.     

A single subunit (GB2) is required for G-protein activation by the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor.

Although G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been shown to assemble into functional homo or heteromers, the role of each protomer in G-protein activation is not known. Among the GPCRs, the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type B receptor (GABA(B)R) is the only one known so far that needs two subunits, GB1 and GB2, to function. The GB1 subunit contains the GABA binding site but is unable to activate G-proteins alone. In contrast the GB2 subunit, which does not bind GABA, has an heptahelical domain able to activate G-proteins when assembled into homodimers (Galvez, T., Duthey, B., Kniazeff, J., Blahos, J., Rovelli, G., Bettler, B., Prézeau, L., and Pin, J.-P. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 2152-2159). In the present study, we have examined the role of each subunit within the GB1-GB2 heteromer, in G-protein coupling. To that end, point mutations in the highly conserved third intracellular loop known to prevent G-protein activation of the related Ca-sensing or metabotropic glutamate receptors were introduced into GB1 and GB2. One mutation, L686P introduced in GB2 prevents the formation of a functional receptor, even though the heteromer reaches the cell surface, and even though the mutated subunit still associates with GB1 and increases GABA affinity on GB1. This was observed either in HEK293 cells where the activation of the G-protein was assessed by measurement of inositol phosphate accumulation, or in cultured neurons where the inhibition of the Ca(2+) channel current was measured. In contrast, the same mutation when introduced into GB1 does not modify the G-protein coupling properties of the heteromeric GABA(B) receptor either in HEK293 cells or in neurons. Accordingly, whereas in all GPCRs the same protein is responsible for both agonist binding and G-protein activation, these two functions are assumed by two distinct subunits in the GABA(B) heteromer: one subunit, GB1, binds the agonists whereas the other, GB2, activates the G-protein. This illustrates the importance of a single subunit for G-protein activation within a dimeric receptor.     

Complex control of GABA(A) receptor subunit mRNA expression: variation, covariation, and genetic regulation

GABA type-A receptors are essential for fast inhibitory neurotransmission and are critical in brain function. Surprisingly, expression of receptor subunits is highly variable among individuals, but the cause and impact of this fluctuation remains unknown. We have studied sources of variation for all 19 receptor subunits using massive expression data sets collected across multiple brain regions and platforms in mice and humans. Expression of Gabra1, Gabra2, Gabrb2, Gabrb3, and Gabrg2 is highly variable and heritable among the large cohort of BXD strains derived from crosses of fully sequenced parents--C57BL/6J and DBA/2J. Genetic control of these subunits is complex and highly dependent on tissue and mRNA region. Remarkably, this high variation is generally not linked to phenotypic differences. The single exception is Gabrb3, a locus that is linked to anxiety. We identified upstream genetic loci that influence subunit expression, including three unlinked regions of chromosome 5 that modulate the expression of nine subunits in hippocampus, and that are also associated with multiple phenotypes. Candidate genes within these loci include, Naaa, Nos1, and Zkscan1. We confirmed a high level of coexpression for subunits comprising the major channel--Gabra1, Gabrb2, and Gabrg2--and identified conserved members of this expression network in mice and humans. Gucy1a3, Gucy1b3, and Lis1 are novel and conserved associates of multiple subunits that are involved in inhibitory signaling. Finally, proximal and distal regions of the 3' UTRs of single subunits have remarkably independent expression patterns in both species. However, corresponding regions of different subunits often show congruent genetic control and coexpression (proximal-to-proximal or distal-to-distal), even in the absence of sequence homology. Our findings identify novel sources of variation that modulate subunit expression and highlight the extraordinary capacity of biological networks to buffer 4-100 fold differences in mRNA levels.     

Consequence of the presence of two different beta subunit isoforms in a GABA(A) receptor

The major isoforms of GABA(A) receptors are thought to be composed of two alpha, two beta and one gamma subunit(s). GABA(A) receptors containing two beta1 subunits respond differently to the anticonvulsive compound loreclezole and the general anaesthetic etomidate than receptors containing two beta2 subunits. Receptors containing beta2 subunits show a much larger allosteric stimulation by these agents than those containing beta1 subunits. We were interested to know how receptors containing both beta1 and beta2 subunits, in different positions respond to loreclezole and etomidate. To answer this question, subunits were fused at the DNA level to form dimeric and trimeric subunits. Concatenated receptors (alpha1-beta1-alpha1/gamma2-beta1, alpha1-beta2-alpha1/gamma2-beta1, alpha1-beta1-alpha1/gamma2-beta2 and alpha1-beta2-alpha1/gamma2-beta2) were expressed in Xenopus ooctyes and functionally compared in their response to the agonist GABA and to the positive allosteric modulators, loreclezole and etomidate. We have shown that (I) in the presence of both beta1 and beta2 subunits in the same pentamer (mixed receptors) direct gating by etomidate is similar to exclusively beta1 containing receptors; (II) In mixed receptors, stimulation by etomidate assumed characteristics intermediate to exclusively beta1 or beta2 containing receptors, but the values for the concentrations < 10 microM were always much closer to those observed in alpha1-beta1-alpha1/gamma2-beta1 receptors; and (III) mixed receptors show no positional effects.     

A GABA(A) receptor of defined subunit composition and positioning: concatenation of five subunits

We show that the five subunits of a gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA(A) receptor) can be concatenated to yield a functional receptor. This concatenated receptor alpha(1)-beta(2)-alpha(1)-gamma(2)-beta(2) has the advantage of a known subunit arrangement. Most of its functional properties are not significantly different from a receptor formed by individual subunits. Extent of expression amounted to about 40% of that of non-concatenated receptors in Xenopus oocytes, after injection of oocytes with comparable amounts of cRNA coding for concatenated and non-concatenated receptors. The ability to express receptors consisting of five subunits enables detailed studies of GABA(A) receptor subtype selective compounds.     

Desensitization of GABA(B) receptor signaling by formation of protein complexes of GABA(B2) subunit with GRK4 or GRK5

We investigated the role of G protein coupled-receptor kinases (GRKs) in the desensitization of GABA(B) receptor-mediated signaling using Xenopus oocytes and baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells. Baclofen elicited inward K(+) currents in oocytes coexpressing heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor, GABA(B1a) subunit (GB(1a)R) and GABA(B2) subunit (GB(2)R), together with G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) channels (GIRKs), in a concentration-dependent manner. Repetitive application of baclofen to oocytes coexpressing GABA(B)R and GIRKs did not change peak K(+) currents in the first and second responses, but the latter responses were significantly attenuated by coexpression of either GRK4 or GRK5 with attenuation efficacy of GRK4 > GRK5. Coexpression of other GRKs including GRK2, GRK3, and GRK6 had no effect on GABA(B) receptor-mediated desensitization processes. In BHK cells coexpressing GRK4 fused to Venus (brighter variant of yellow fluorescent protein, GRK4-Venus) with GB(1a)R and GB(2)R, GRK4-Venus was expressed in the cytosol but was translocated to the plasma membranes by GABA(B)R activation. In BHK cells coexpressing GRK4 fused to Cerulean (brighter variant of cyan fluorescent protein, GRK4-Cerulean) with GB(1a)R and GB(2)R-Venus, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis demonstrated that GRK4-Cerulean formed a protein complex with GB(2)R-Venus. Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis confirmed GB(2)R-GRK4 complex formation. GRK5 also formed a complex with GB(2)R on the plasma membranes as determined by FRET and Western blotting but not GRK2, GRK3, and GRK6. Our results indicate that GRK4 and GRK5 desensitize GABA(B) receptor-mediated responses by forming protein complexes with GB(2)R subunit of GABA(B)R at the plasma membranes.