Comparative experience with smooth and polyurethane breast implants using the Kaplan-Meier method of survival analysis.

Smooth-walled silicone implants have been widely used in breast surgery. Capsular contracture, causing undesirable firmness and spherical deformity, has been a common problem. Recent studies suggest that polyurethane-covered breast implants are associated with a lower incidence of capsular contracture. The statistical methodology employed in some of these studies, however, may be subject to criticism. Between July of 1984 and June of 1990 (72 months), 427 polyurethane breast implants were used in 279 patients and 439 smooth prostheses were used in 250 patients for a variety of aesthetic and reconstructive procedures. The occurrence of capsular contracture was carefully monitored and then analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method of survival analysis. This method is particularly well suited to analysis of these types of clinical data because it allows for the fact that contractures occur at varying intervals after surgery and that follow-up of patients is incomplete. The probability of capsular contracture with smooth-walled prostheses was found to be significantly greater than with polyurethane-covered implants in each group of patients studied (p less than 0.05). Other complications occurred at a similar rate regardless of prosthesis type. This study supports the belief that polyurethane breast implants have a lower contracture rate; furthermore, it introduces the Kaplan-Meier method for analyzing the outcome of alternative plastic surgical therapies.     

Eighty-four consecutive breast reconstructions using a textured silicone tissue expander.

Breast reconstruction utilizing smooth-surface silicone tissue expanders is associated with certain problems. Significant capsular contracture may develop around the expander with subsequent expander displacement necessitating repositioning or capsulectomy at the time of expander removal. Infection, pain on expansion, chest-wall compression, and complications related to the remote fill valve also have been reported. A textured-surface silicone expander with an integrated fill valve was developed to address these issues. Eighty-four consecutive breast reconstructions were performed by a single surgeon using textured expanders in 55 patients. Intraexpander pressures were measured during expansion for a group of these patients, and both initial and postinflation pressure readings were quite low (average initial pressure 2.88 mmHg; average postinflation pressure 12.87 mmHg). Eighty-one of the reconstructions have been completed without any expander losses and with minimal complications. Tissue expander volume averaged 580 cc, and the expansion duration averaged 5.6 months. Various types and configurations of permanent implants were used to complete the reconstructions. Eighty-four percent of our patients' completed reconstructions (including nippleareola reconstruction and opposite breast alteration, when necessary) were accomplished with just two procedures. Seventeen long-term adjustable textured-surface expander/implants with anatomic breast shape are still in place, all after only one operation. The inframmary fold has generally been established passively by the expansion process alone. Textured-surface silicone expanders have stayed where positioned, have expanded easily with minimal patient pain, and have created a noncontractile soft-tissue cover for the final implant. The textured expander with an integrated fill valve has simplified breast reconstruction by helping to limit the problems encountered with smooth silicone expanders. The resulting reconstructions have remained soft with a very acceptable aesthetic appearance. The patient office and hospital charts and photographs of this consecutive series were notarized and submitted to the Editor of this Journal, whose biostatistician randomly selected the cases illustrated.     

Capsular contracture in silicone gel and saline-filled breast implants after reconstruction

Comparisons between results with randomly allotted silicone-gel and saline-filled prostheses in breast reconstruction after mastectomy led to the following conclusions. Neither prosthesis type is ideal. Leakage from saline-filled implants occurred in 2 of the 37 implants, with resultant deflation. Silicone prostheses had a significantly higher rate of capsular contracture [surgeon's evaluation: 54 percent capsular contracture for silicone-gel compared with 20 percent for saline-filled prostheses (p = 0.006); patients' evaluation for the same figures: 54 percent compared with 29 percent (p = 0.03)]. Other authors have shown the presence of silicone in the tissue around silicone-gel-filled silicone implants, but less or none around saline-filled silicone implants. Since the only difference between the two groups was the randomly allotted implants, we assume that the free silicone around silicone-gel-filled prostheses is the major cause of capsular contracture. Since the saline-filled implants showed a 20 percent capsular contracture rate, there could be other causes of capsular contracture in this study. For prevention of contracture, improved implant encapsulation and use of a less reactive filling substance seem to offer possibilities. Surgical technique should aim to preserve the integrity of the prosthesis.     

Long-term use of polyurethane breast prostheses: a 14-year experience

I have used polyurethane prostheses for the past 14 years, implanting 220 implants into 130 patients who desired breast reconstruction after subcutaneous mastectomy or cancer ablation or simply breast augmentation. I theorize that a polyurethane-covered implant resists contracture, retaining its compressibility because the fibroblasts proliferate into the polyurethane in many different directions. When the fibrils contract, the forces of contracture counterbalance one another, resisting contracture. However, when smooth prostheses are implanted, fibrils are directed in a circular fashion around the implant and naturally contract, leading to firmer breasts. There were 115 prostheses inserted following subcutaneous mastectomy, and 22 percent developed contracted capsules. Seven implants became exposed because of skin necroses; one was removed because of a Staphylococcus infection; and two patients developed a combination of polyurethane and silicone granulomas. These developed only with the earlier implant, where there was shedding of the polyurethane sponge layer and silicone bled from the low-viscosity silicone used in the earlier implants. No granulomas were noted with the currently used Surgitek Replicon implant. Eighty-five breasts were reconstructed after cancer ablation with polyurethane implants, and the contracture rate was 2.3 percent. Other complications were minimal. A smaller group of patients had augmentation mammaplasty, and 20 prostheses were placed in 10 patients. A 15 percent contracture rate was noted in this group. In this study, 82 percent of patients were followed for up to 14 years. Capsular contractures occurred in 30 implants between 1 and 11 years, for an average recurrence at 6.3 years. The overall contracture rate was 13 percent. Other complications were minimal. All implants were placed subcutaneously or subglandularly, and all were drained.     

Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants

Although textured silicone breast implants have been shown to reduce the incidence of capsular contracture, there is little evidence if this effect is maintained in the long term. It has been 10 years since the double-blind randomized trial in which 53 patients received either Mentor smooth (26) or textured silicone gel implants (27). Of the 14 patients who were not known to have developed a contracture in the smooth group, 11 were reviewed. Three had bilateral contractures. In the textured group, 18 of the 24 patients not known to have contractures were reviewed. None had developed contractures. At 10 years, the incidence of capsular contracture was 65 percent of patients with smooth implants (an increase of 6 percent on the 3-year results) and 11 percent for the textured implant patients (no change on the 3-year results). A database containing the details of 1100 patients reinforces these results by examining the differences in contracture rates of textured, smooth, and polyurethane-coated implants. The effect of submuscular placement on reducing contracture rates regardless of texturing is discussed, as is the apparent increase in capsular contracture in patients who smoke.     

The biophysical and histologic properties of capsules formed by smooth and textured silicone implants in the rabbit.

Capsular contracture remains the major complication of reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if a silicone implant with a textured surface will form a capsule of significantly different biophysical and histologic properties than conventional smooth silicone. Thirty smooth and 30 textured silicone tissue expanders were implanted under the panniculus carnosus of rabbits. After 3 months, measurements related to contracture were performed on anesthetized animals in an investigator-blinded, controlled manner. Intraexpander pressures were measured as saline was injected over time. We found a significant correlation between intraexpander pressures, applanation tonometry, and Baker class. Histology revealed a thicker, more adherent, and inflammatory capsule around the textured silicone implants as compared with the smooth silicone implants. Dynamic pressures were plotted against volume of saline within the two types of implants. Statistical analysis revealed that the textured implants form a tighter and thicker capsule than the smooth implants after 3 months of observation (p less than 0.005).     

Self-reported diseases and symptoms by rupture status among unselected Danish women with cosmetic silicone breast implants

Epidemiologic evidence does not support an association between silicone breast implants and connective tissue or other rheumatic diseases. However, a recent study has suggested that women with ruptured implants may be at increased risk of developing fibromyalgia. An analysis of adverse health outcomes according to breast implant rupture status was conducted in 238 unselected Danish women with cosmetic silicone breast implants. Ninety-two of the women had definite implant rupture, and 146 had intact implants as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Before undergoing imaging, the women provided blood samples and completed a self-administered questionnaire. Women with ruptured implants overall, and the subgroup with extracapsular ruptures (n = 23), were compared with women with intact implants regarding a number of self-reported diseases and symptoms and the presence of specific autoantibodies, such as antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and cardiolipin immunoglobulin G and M antibodies. Overall, there were no differences in the occurrence of self-reported diseases or symptoms or in the presence of autoantibodies between women with intact implants and women with ruptured implants, including extracapsular rupture. The only exception was capsular contracture, which was reported six times more frequently by women with extracapsular ruptures than by women with intact implants (OR, 6.3; 95 percent CI, 1.7 to 23.5). In conclusion, this study of unselected women with silicone breast implants could establish no association between silicone implant rupture and specific diseases or symptoms related to connective tissue disease or other rheumatic conditions, except for an excess of capsular contracture among women with extracapsular rupture.     

Use of stacked polyurethane-covered mammary implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery

The use of stacked polyurethane-covered mammary implants has proven useful in improving results in the correction of deficiencies of mammary form and projection that can occur in certain cases of congenital and acquired breast deformity. The method has been used in 57 patients (102 breasts). The rate of significant complications, including seroma, rash, infection, hematoma, and capsular contracture, has been low (1 to 6 percent). Polyurethane-covered implants will maintain their position when used in a stacked system because of their unique biophysical characteristics, which include tissue bonding and a high friction coefficient between the implant surfaces.     

The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to "dual-plane" positioning: technique and outcomes

Little has been published regarding the treatment of patients with long-established capsular contracture after previous submuscular or subglandular breast augmentation. This study reviews 7 years of experience in treating established capsular contracture after augmentation mammaplasty by relocating implants to the "dual-plane" or partly subpectoral position. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who were treated for capsular contracture using this technique between 1993 and 1999. Data collected included the date of the original augmentation, the original implant location, date of revision and type of implant used, length of follow-up, outcome, and any ensuing complications. Different surgical techniques were used, depending on whether the prior implant was located in a subglandular or submuscular plane. All patients had revisions such that their implants were relocated to a dual plane, with the superior two thirds or so of the implant located beneath the pectoralis major muscle and the inferior one third located subglandularly. Of 85 patients reviewed, 54 had their original implants in a submuscular position and 31 had their initial augmentation in a subglandular position. Of the 54 patients whose implants were initially submuscular, 23 patients (43 percent) had silicone gel implants, 15 patients (28 percent) had double-lumen implants, and the remaining 16 patients (30 percent) had saline implants. Of the 31 patients whose implants were initially subglandular, 20 patients (65 percent) had silicone gel implants, three patients (10 percent) had double-lumen implants, and the remaining eight patients (26 percent) had saline implants. Fifty-one patients (60 percent) had replacement with saline implants (37 smooth saline, 14 textured saline), whereas 34 (40 percent) had silicone gel implants (seven smooth gel, 27 textured gel). The average time from previous augmentation to revision was 9 years 9 months. The average follow-up time after conversion to the dual-plane position was 11.5 months. Only three of 85 patients required reoperation for complications, all of which involved some degree of implant malposition. Of patients converted to the dual plane, 98 percent were free of capsular contracture and were Baker class I at follow-up, whereas 2 percent were judged as Baker class II. There were no Baker level III or IV contractures at follow-up. The dual-plane method of breast augmentation has proved to be an effective technique for correcting established capsular contracture after previous augmentation mammaplasty. This technique appears to be effective when performed with either silicone or saline-filled implants.     

The biomechanical and histopathologic effects of surface texturing with silicone and polyurethane in tissue implantation and expansion.

There has been considerable interest in determining the effect of morphologic alterations of prosthetic surfaces on capsule response in breast surgery. The purpose of this study was to provide a precise, three-dimensional evaluation of soft-tissue response to surface modifications in both implantation and expansion. Expandable 100-cc prostheses were designed with one of three surfaces: textured silicone (Biocell), standard smooth silicone, or polyurethane (Natural-Y, Meme). A new submuscular implantation site in the rabbit was developed. Each animal randomly received a smooth-surface device on one side and either a textured silicone or polyurethane device on the other. In one group of animals, the prostheses were expanded monthly. Capsular response was evaluated monthly in vivo using standardized techniques as well as biomechanical methods for up to 6 months in the expander group (n = 7 to 16) and 8 months in the implant group (n = 7 to 15). Analysis of biomechanical and histologic data revealed that prosthetic surface morphology can specifically alter capsular response. Polyurethane was the only effective surface in preventing capsular contracture in implantation. In expansion, both textured silicone and polyurethane surfaces resulted in significantly less capsular contracture and less resistance to expansion than comparable smooth-surfaced controls. Statistical comparisons reveal that the biomechanical methods utilized in this study provide the most precise and objective method of defining overall soft-tissue contracture around implanted biomaterials.     

Silicone gel-filled breast implant integrity: a retrospective review of 478 consecutively explanted implants

Concern has been expressed over the long-term integrity of silicone gel breast implants. There are no large series representing experience with these implants outside of the United States. A retrospective case note review of explanted silicone breast implants was performed; 478 implants have been explanted during the past 11 years and relate to the use of these devices since 1971. Loss of implant integrity was not simply related to its age in vivo. Failure was more likely with implants of the late 1970s and early 1980s (second generation) and with subpectoral placement. Implant failure was independent of capsular contracture as the indication for removal (p = 0.09). There is no evidence that the currently used textured silicone gel breast implants are subject to the same loss of integrity as previous examples of these devices. The life span of these implants, the first of which are approaching 10 years in vivo, is at present unknown. Information concerning the integrity of silicone gel breast implants is essential in the current climate for counseling of both new and old implant recipients.     

Polyurethane foam-covered implants and capsular contracture: a laboratory investigation

Experiments were conducted in rabbits comparing polyurethane foam-covered implants with otherwise identical smooth silicone gel implants. Using five objective methods of measurement of capsular contracture, no significant difference could be identified. The foam-covered implants consistently developed capsular contracture, although in most cases this was of mild degree and would not have been clinically significant. In the two foam-covered implants with hard contractures, there was no evidence of hematoma or separation of the foam.     

The effect of breast implants on the radiographic detection of microcalcification and soft-tissue masses

Current implants for breast augmentation containing silicone gel, saline, or both can totally obscure mammographic detection of microcalcifications and soft-tissue masses. To investigate the possibility of developing a more radiolucent implant, radiographs were obtained of silicone shells that contained silicone gel, saline, silicone gel and saline, polyurethane-covered silicone gel, gelatin, sunflower oil, and peanut oil. All radiographs were obtained using a Siemens Mammomat by placing the implant over an American College of Radiology mammography phantom. Results were measured by the ability to visualize or resolve the artifacts in the mammography phantom. The silicone shell alone minimally altered artifact resolution. Silicone shells filled with silicone gel, silicone gel and saline, saline alone, polyurethane-covered silicone gel, and gelatin were equal in radiodensity and completely obscured all phantom artifacts. Silicone shells filled with peanut oil and sunflower oil had equal radiodensity and allowed visualization of large microcalcifications and some soft-tissue masses. Current implants used for augmentation mammaplasty can totally obscure mammographic detection of microcalcifications and soft-tissue masses. A more radiolucent breast implant is possible, and further research is needed to define the best filler material and test its biocompatibility.     

Radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction with implants

The use of implants in immediate breast reconstruction is presently a common option. However, the practice should be evaluated in consideration of possible adjuvant therapies needed to control disease and to rule out negative interactions. This article discusses the effects of radiotherapy on breast implants with regard to the final cosmetic result. Six out of 124 cases of immediate breast reconstruction with implants were followed and evaluated in terms of capsular contracture and final aesthetic result after adjuvant radiotherapy and compared with the results of 118 patients who did not require irradiation. All of the patients who received irradiation demonstrated poor to fair results, with grade III to IV capsular contracture. Two patients received radiation therapy for local recurrences, which worsened their capsular contracture, emphasizing the deleterious effect of irradiation on breast implants. Statistical analysis of the results demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups in terms of capsular contracture and breast symmetry. In the selection of patient candidates for immediate breast reconstruction with implants, adjuvant radiation therapy must be considered as a contraindication, at least from an aesthetic point of view.     

Treatment of breast contractures with open capsulotomy and replacement of gel prostheses with polyurethane-covered implants

Capsular contracture around gel and gel-saline implants is the most common complication following breast augmentation and reconstruction. Thirty-one patients with postaugmentation gel-implant contractures were treated with open capsulotomy and replacement with polyurethane-covered implants. Eighty-seven percent remain soft after a minimum follow-up of 14 months. Results of replacement after subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction are more varied and less successful. Results in 14 patients are presented.     

Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules

The pathogenesis of fibrous capsular contracture after augmentation mammaplasty is still debated. One hypothesis implicates low-grade bacterial infections as a cause. The presence of a staphylococcal biofilm in a patient with recurrent capsular contracture was previously reported. A comparative, prospective, blinded, clinical study of implants and capsules removed from patients with or without significant capsular contracture was conducted to investigate the association of biofilm contamination, breast implants, and capsular contracture.Capsule and implant samples obtained during explantation were tested by routine microbiological culture, sensitive broth culture (after maceration and sonication), and scanning electron microscopy. Clinical parameters were correlated with microbiological findings. A total of 48 implant and/or capsule samples were obtained from 27 breasts during a 22-month period. Of the 27 breasts, 19 exhibited significant contracture (Baker grade III/IV). The mean duration of implantation was 9.2 years (range, 0.4 to 26.0 years). Routine swab cultures obtained at the time of explantation were negative for bacterial growth for all samples. The sensitive broth culture technique yielded 24 positive samples (50 percent, n = 48). An analysis of capsules demonstrated that 17 of 19 samples obtained from patients with significant contracture were positive, compared with only one of eight samples obtained from patients with minimal or no contracture (p = 0.0006). Fourteen of the 17 positive cultures from significantly contracted breasts yielded coagulase-negative staphylococci, mainly, species of the Staphylococcus epidermidis group. The presence of coagulase-negative staphylococci was also significantly associated with capsular contracture (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the frequency of culture positivity for saline versus silicone implants (p = 0.885). Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the presence of extensive biofilm on implants and within capsules.Biofilm, in particular, S. epidermidis biofilm, was detected for a significant proportion of patients with capsular contracture. This implicates biofilm disease in the pathogenesis of contracture, and strategies for its prevention should be explored.     

Comparison of the Postoperative Incidence Rate of Capsular Contracture among Different Breast Implants: A Cumulative Meta-Analysis

BackgroundA large number of clinical studies have reported that the different materials used in breast implants were a possible cause of the different incidence rates of capsular contracture observed in patients after implantation. However, this theory lacks comprehensive support from evidence-based medicine, and considerable controversy remains.ObjectivesIn this study, a cumulative systematic review examined breast augmentation that used implants with textured or smooth surfaces to analyze the effects of these two types of implants on the occurrence of postoperative capsular contracture.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of literature databases, including PubMed and EMBASE, for clinical reports on the incidence of capsular contracture after the implantation of breast prostheses. We performed a cumulative meta-analysis on the incidence of capsular contracture in order from small to large sample sizes and conducted subgroup analyses according to the prosthetic material used, the implant pocket placement, the incision type and the duration of follow-up. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as the final pooled statistics.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two retrospective studies. The cumulative comparison of textured and smooth breast implants showed statistical significance at 2.13 (95% CI, 1.18-3.86) when the fourth study was entered into the analysis. With the inclusion of more reports, the final results indicated that smooth breast implants were more likely to be associated with capsular contracture, with statistical significance at 3.10 (95% CI, 2.23-4.33). In the subgroup analyses, the subgroups based on implant materials included the silicone implant group and the saline implant group, with significant pooled statistical levels of 4.05 (95% CI, 1.97-8.31) and 3.12 (95% CI, 2.19-4.42), respectively. According to implant pocket placement, a subglandular group and a submuscular group were included in the analyses, and only the subglandular group had a statistically significant pooled result of 3.59 (95% CI, 2.43-5.30). Four subgroups were included in the analyses according to incision type: the inframammary incision group, the periareolar incision group, the transaxillary incision group and the mastectomy incision group. Among these groups, only the pooled results of the inframammary and mastectomy incision groups were statistically significant, at 2.82 (95% CI, 1.30-6.11) and 2.30 (95% CI, 1.17-4.50), respectively. Three follow-up duration subgroups were included in the analyses: the one-year group, the two- to three-year group and the ≥five-year group. These subgroups had statistically significant results of 4.67 (95% CI, 2.35-9.28), 3.42 (95% CI, 2.26-5.16) and 2.71 (95% CI, 1.64-4.49), respectively.ConclusionIn mammaplasty, the use of textured implants reduces the incidence of postoperative capsular contracture. Differences in implant pocket placement and incision type are also likely to affect the incidence of capsular contracture; however, this conclusion awaits further study.     

Recurrence of subglandular breast implant capsular contracture: anterior versus total capsulectomy

The objective of this study was to determine whether the type of capsulectomy, anterior or total, affects the recurrence of capsular contracture around subglandular silicone-gel breast implants. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent either anterior or total capsulectomy for Baker grade 3 or 4 subglandular capsular contracture in our unit. All patients were invited to a review clinic where their capsular status was assessed. There were 100 anterior- disc capsulectomies in 60 patients between 1988 and 1997 and 99 total capsulectomies in 60 patients between 1990 and 1998. The follow-up in the former group was a median of 7 years and mean 6.9 years, compared with median 2.5 and mean 3.1 years in the latter group. Eighty-six percent of the implants removed from both groups at capsulectomy were smooth-walled gel-filled implants. Sixty-nine breasts in the anterior group received textured gel implants at capsulectomy; the remaining 31 received polyurethane-coated Meme implants. In the total capsulectomy group, all but two breasts (one patient) received textured gel implants. After review, the capsular status was known in 80 percent of the anterior and 92 percent of the total capsulectomy group. The review clinic found eight new contractures in five patients to have developed in the anterior compared with none in the total group. Recurrent contractures affected 50 percent of patients (46 percent of breasts) in the anterior and 11 percent of patients (10 percent of breasts) in the total capsulectomy group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to the data. By including only patients who received textured gel implants at capsulectomy, the Logrank found a statistical difference between the two treatment groups (0.01 < p < 0.5). We believe that this study provides some evidence that total capsulectomy for subglandular silicone breast implant capsular contracture results in a lower capsular recurrence than anterior- disc capsulectomy. The pattern and risk of recurrence after total capsulectomy and exchange for a modern textured prosthesis appear to approach those following primary augmentation.     

A clinical comparison of the tendency to capsular contracture between smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants.

The aim of this prospective, controlled clinical investigation was to find out if there is a difference in the capsular contracture rate between silicone implants with a smooth or textured surface as the only difference. Twenty-five women with bilateral mammary hypoplasia underwent mammary augmentation. All got a textured implant on one side and a smooth implant on the other. The implants were placed subglandularly. Follow-up examinations were done on six occasions. Three parameters were used for estimation of the tendency to capsular contracture: (1) the patient's opinion on differences in hardness of the breasts, (2) the investigator's classification of capsular contracture, and (3) applanation tonometry. At the end of the follow-up period, after 1 year, all parameters showed with no doubt that the breasts augmented with textured implants had a lower tendency to develop contracting capsules than the breasts augmented with smooth implants.     

Chest-wall deformity after tissue expansion for breast reconstruction

A prospective longitudinal study of chest-wall deformity after tissue expansion for breast reconstruction was performed in 19 women. CT imaging was a sensitive method for detecting occult deformity. Using a semiquantitative scale for measuring deformity, all patients and 94 percent of expanders had some thoracic abnormality after tissue expansion. Rib and chest-wall contour changes were observed under 81 and 68 percent of the expanders, respectively. Routine chest roentgenograms were not a sensitive method for evaluating these deformities. The magnitude of deformity after unilateral expansion was not significantly different from that after bilateral expansion. Linear regression analysis indicated that early periprosthetic capsular contracture was negatively correlated with chest wall deformity. Only one patient experienced a clinically noticeable complication from chest compression--transient postexpansion exertional dyspnea. After removing the expanders and placing permanent implants along with capsulotomy, the mean deformity index decreased by 57 percent after 10.5 months median follow-up, which was highly significant (p less than 0.001). Our findings suggest that chest-wall deformity is a common occurrence after tissue expansion in patients undergoing breast reconstruction and is usually of minor clinical significance.