Synaptic Vesicle Exocytosis

Presynaptic nerve terminals release neurotransmitters by synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Membrane fusion mediating synaptic exocytosis and other intracellular membrane traffic is affected by a universal machinery that includes SNARE (for “soluble NSF-attachment protein receptor”) and SM (for “Sec1/Munc18-like”) proteins. During fusion, vesicular and target SNARE proteins assemble into an α-helical trans-SNARE complex that forces the two membranes tightly together, and SM proteins likely wrap around assembling trans-SNARE complexes to catalyze membrane fusion. After fusion, SNARE complexes are dissociated by the ATPase NSF (for “N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor”). Fusion-competent conformations of SNARE proteins are maintained by chaperone complexes composed of CSPα, Hsc70, and SGT, and by nonenzymatically acting synuclein chaperones; dysfunction of these chaperones results in neurodegeneration. The synaptic membrane-fusion machinery is controlled by synaptotagmin, and additionally regulated by a presynaptic protein matrix (the “active zone”) that includes Munc13 and RIM proteins as central components.Synaptic vesicles are uniform organelles of ∼40 nm diameter that constitute the central organelle for neurotransmitter release. Each presynaptic nerve terminal contains hundreds of synaptic vesicles that are filled with neurotransmitters. When an action potential depolarizes the presynaptic plasma membrane, Ca²⁺-channels open, and Ca²⁺ flows into the nerve terminal to trigger the exocytosis of synaptic vesicles, thereby releasing their neurotransmitters into the synaptic cleft (Fig. 1). Ca²⁺ triggers exocytosis by binding to synaptotagmin; after exocytosis, vesicles are re-endocytosed, recycled, and refilled with neurotransmitters. Recycling can occur by multiple parallel pathways, either by fast recycling via local reuse of vesicles (“kiss-and-run” and “kiss-and-stay”), or by slower recycling via an endosomal intermediate (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The synaptic vesicle cycle. A presynaptic nerve terminal is depicted schematically as it contacts a postsynaptic neuron. The synaptic vesicle cycle consists of exocytosis (red arrows) followed by endocytosis and recycling (yellow arrows). Synaptic vesicles (green circles) are filled with neurotransmitters (NT; red dots) by active transport (neurotransmitter uptake) fueled by an electrochemical gradient established by a proton pump that acidifies the vesicle interior (vesicle acidification; green background). In preparation to synaptic exocytosis, synaptic vesicles are docked at the active zone, and primed by an ATP-dependent process that renders the vesicles competent to respond to a Ca²⁺-signal. When an action potential depolarizes the presynaptic membrane, Ca²⁺-channels open, causing a local increase in intracellular Ca²⁺ at the active zone that triggers completion of the fusion reaction. Released neurotransmitters then bind to receptors associated with the postsynaptic density (PSD). After fusion pore opening, synaptic vesicles probably recycle via three alternative pathways: local refilling with neurotransmitters without undocking (“kiss-and-stay”), local recycling with undocking (“kiss-and-run”), and full recycling of vesicles with passage through an endosomal intermediate. (Adapted from Südhof 2004.)Due to their small size, synaptic vesicles contain a limited complement of proteins that have been described in detail (Südhof 2004; Takamori et al. 2006). Although the functions of several vesicle components remain to be identified, most vesicle components participate in one of three processes: neurotransmitter uptake and storage, vesicle exocytosis, and vesicle endocytosis and recycling. In addition, it is likely that at least some vesicle proteins are involved in the biogenesis of synaptic vesicles and the maintenance of their exquisite uniformity and stability, but little is known about how vesicles are made, and what determines their size.     

Limited Intermixing of Synaptic Vesicle Components upon Vesicle Recycling

Synaptic vesicles recycle repeatedly in order to maintain synaptic transmission. We have previously proposed that upon exocytosis the vesicle components persist as clusters, which would be endocytosed as whole units. It has also been proposed that the vesicle components diffuse into the plasma membrane and are then randomly gathered into new vesicles. We found here that while strong stimulation (releasing the entire recycling pool) causes the diffusion of the vesicle marker synaptotagmin out of synaptic boutons, moderate stimulation (releasing ～19% of all vesicles) is followed by no measurable diffusion. In agreement with this observation, synaptotagmin molecules labeled with different fluorescently tagged antibodies did not appear to mix upon vesicle recycling, when investigated by subdiffraction resolution stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy. Finally, as protein diffusion from vesicles has been mainly observed using molecules tagged with pH‐sensitive green fluorescent protein (pHluorin), we have also investigated the membrane patterning of several native and pHluorin‐tagged proteins. While the native proteins had a clustered distribution, the GFP‐tagged ones were diffused in the plasma membrane. We conclude that synaptic vesicle components intermix little, at least under moderate stimulation, possibly because of the formation of clusters in the plasma membrane. We suggest that several pHluorin‐tagged vesicle proteins are less well integrated in clusters.     

Organization of Brain Synaptic Vesicle Proteins

Abstract: The topographical arrangement of proteins and glycoproteins of mouse brain synaptic vesicles was studied with trypsin and galactose oxidase, reagents known to be impermeable with respect to other membranes. Incubation of vesicles with trypsin at a concentration of 1 μg/ml extensively degraded seven polypeptides of molecular weights (M.W.) (×10^-3) 125, 107, 95, 83, 70, 60, and 36; higher concentrations degraded two additional species of 75,000 and 46,000 M.W., while leaving unaffected polypeptides of M.W. 66,000, 55,000, 33,000, 26,000, 22,000, 19,000, and 16,000. All of the trypsin-sensitive species of greater than 70,000 M.W. stained positively with the periodic acid-Schiff reagent; several other glycoproteins, all of M.W. less than 70,000, were identified, and all of these were insensitive to trypsin. Galactose oxidase-NaB³H₄ treatment of synaptic vesicles heavily and exclusively labeled material of greater than 70,000 M.W. All of the polypeptides studied were sensitive to each reagent when the synaptic vesicles were first treated with detergents. Extraction of vesicles with 0.05 M-NaOH partially or completely removed a wide variety of polypeptides, including most of those in the M.W. range 46,000–83,000; none of the glycoproteins was solubilized. Essentially the opposite results were obtained when the vesicles were extracted with 0.5% Triton X-100. Most of the vesicle's species were insensitive to several bisimidate cross-linking reagents. These results suggest that: (a) The polypeptides of M.W. 125K, 107K, 95K, 83K, 75K, 70K, 60K, 46K, and 36K are externally oriented in the vesicle, whereas those of 66K, 55K, 33K, 26K, 22K, 19K, and 16K are internally oriented; (b) the vesicles contain two classes of glycoproteins, one consisting of high-molecular-weight, externally oriented species that are rich in galactose, and the other consisting of low-molecular-weight, internally oriented species of relatively low galactose content; (c) the vesicles contain a large class of nonglycosylated species that are relatively loosely attached to the membrane; and (d) most of the vesicles' polypeptides are probably freely mobile in the membrane. The organization of synaptic vesicle proteins is compared with that of the proteins of synaptosomal plasma membrane, with which the vesicle is believed to fuse.     

Vesicular Glutamate Transporter 1 Orchestrates Recruitment of Other Synaptic Vesicle Cargo Proteins during Synaptic Vesicle Recycling

A long standing question in synaptic physiology is how neurotransmitter-filled vesicles are rebuilt after exocytosis. Among the first steps in this process is the endocytic retrieval of the transmembrane proteins that are enriched in synaptic vesicles (SVs). At least six types of transmembrane proteins must be recovered, but the rules for how this multiple cargo selection is accomplished are poorly understood. Among these SV cargos is the vesicular glutamate transporter (vGlut). We show here that vGlut1 has a strong influence on the kinetics of retrieval of half of the known SV cargos and that specifically impairing the endocytosis of vGlut1 in turn slows down other SV cargos, demonstrating that cargo retrieval is a collective cargo-driven process. Finally, we demonstrate that different cargos can be retrieved in the same synapse with different kinetics, suggesting that additional post-endocytic sorting steps likely occur in the nerve terminal.     

Synapse-Assembly Proteins Maintain Synaptic Vesicle Cluster Stability and Regulate Synaptic Vesicle Transport in Caenorhabditis elegans

The functional integrity of neurons requires the bidirectional active transport of synaptic vesicles (SVs) in axons. The kinesin motor KIF1A transports SVs from somas to stable SV clusters at synapses, while dynein moves them in the opposite direction. However, it is unclear how SV transport is regulated and how SVs at clusters interact with motor proteins. We addressed these questions by isolating a rare temperature-sensitive allele of Caenorhabditis elegans unc-104 (KIF1A) that allowed us to manipulate SV levels in axons and dendrites. Growth at 20° and 14° resulted in locomotion rates that were ∼3 and 50% of wild type, respectively, with similar effects on axonal SV levels. Corresponding with the loss of SVs from axons, mutants grown at 14° and 20° showed a 10- and 24-fold dynein-dependent accumulation of SVs in their dendrites. Mutants grown at 14° and switched to 25° showed an abrupt irreversible 50% decrease in locomotion and a 50% loss of SVs from the synaptic region 12-hr post-shift, with no further decreases at later time points, suggesting that the remaining clustered SVs are stable and resistant to retrograde removal by dynein. The data further showed that the synapse-assembly proteins SYD-1, SYD-2, and SAD-1 protected SV clusters from degradation by motor proteins. In syd-1, syd-2, and sad-1 mutants, SVs accumulate in an UNC-104-dependent manner in the distal axon region that normally lacks SVs. In addition to their roles in SV cluster stability, all three proteins also regulate SV transport.     

Rabphilin-3A: A Multifunctional Regulator of Synaptic Vesicle Traffic

We have investigated the function of the synaptic vesicle protein Rabphilin-3A in neurotransmitter release at the squid giant synapse. Presynaptic microinjection of recombinant Rabphilin-3A reversibly inhibited the exocytotic release of neurotransmitter. Injection of fragments of Rabphilin-3A indicate that at least two distinct regions of the protein inhibit neurotransmitter release: the NH₂-terminal region that binds Rab3A and is phosphorylated by protein kinases and the two C2 domains that interact with calcium, phospholipid, and β-adducin. Each of the inhibitory fragments and the full-length protein had separate effects on presynaptic morphology, suggesting that individual domains were inhibiting a subset of the reactions in which the full-length protein participates. In addition to inhibiting exocytosis, constructs containing the NH₂ terminus of Rabphilin-3A also perturbed the endocytotic pathway, as indicated by changes in the membrane areas of endosomes, coated vesicles, and the plasma membrane. These results indicate that Rabphilin-3A regulates synaptic vesicle traffic and appears to do so at distinct stages of both the exocytotic and endocytotic pathways.     

Synaptic Vesicle Dynamics: A Simple Model of Phasic Release

We present a simple model of phasic neurotransmitter release whichreproduces the salient features of chemical neurotransmission. The synapticvesicle cycle has been modelled as a set of biochemical reactionsrepresented by a system of coupled differential equations. These equationshave been solved analytically to obtain the time dependent behaviour of thesystem on perturbation from the steady state. The scheme of the synapticvesicle network has been emphasized and its role in determining some of themajor experimentally observed properties of synaptic transmission has beendiscussed, which includes the biphasic decay of the rate neurotransmitterrelease even under sustained stimulation. Another interesting outcome ofthis theoretical exercise is the saturation of total release with thecalcium dependent rate constant. The theoretically calculated values oftotal release fit very well into a sigmoidal saturating function with afourth order cooperativity exponent similar to the empiricalDodge–Rahamimoff equation. It appears that the synaptic vesiclenetwork itself is responsible for some of the major properties associatedwith chemical neurotransmission.     

Synapsin Isoforms and Synaptic Vesicle Trafficking

Synapsins were the first presynaptic proteins identified and have served as the flagship of the presynaptic protein field. Here we review recent studies demonstrating that different members of the synapsin family play different roles at presynaptic terminals employing different types of synaptic vesicles. The structural underpinnings for these functions are just beginning to be understood and should provide a focus for future efforts.     

Molecular Underpinnings of Synaptic Vesicle Pool Heterogeneity

Neuronal communication relies on chemical synaptic transmission for information transfer and processing. Chemical neurotransmission is initiated by synaptic vesicle fusion with the presynaptic active zone resulting in release of neurotransmitters. Classical models have assumed that all synaptic vesicles within a synapse have the same potential to fuse under different functional contexts. In this model, functional differences among synaptic vesicle populations are ascribed to their spatial distribution in the synapse with respect to the active zone. Emerging evidence suggests, however, that synaptic vesicles are not a homogenous population of organelles, and they possess intrinsic molecular differences and differential interaction partners. Recent studies have reported a diverse array of synaptic molecules that selectively regulate synaptic vesicles' ability to fuse synchronously and asynchronously in response to action potentials or spontaneously irrespective of action potentials. Here we discuss these molecular mediators of vesicle pool heterogeneity that are found on the synaptic vesicle membrane, on the presynaptic plasma membrane, or within the cytosol and consider some of the functional consequences of this diversity. This emerging molecular framework presents novel avenues to probe synaptic function and uncover how synaptic vesicle pools impact neuronal signaling.      

The Vesicle Protein SAM-4 Regulates the Processivity of Synaptic Vesicle Transport

Axonal transport of synaptic vesicles (SVs) is a KIF1A/UNC-104 mediated process critical for synapse development and maintenance yet little is known of how SV transport is regulated. Using C. elegans as an in vivo model, we identified SAM-4 as a novel conserved vesicular component regulating SV transport. Processivity, but not velocity, of SV transport was reduced in sam-4 mutants. sam-4 displayed strong genetic interactions with mutations in the cargo binding but not the motor domain of unc-104. Gain-of-function mutations in the unc-104 motor domain, identified in this study, suppress the sam-4 defects by increasing processivity of the SV transport. Genetic analyses suggest that SAM-4, SYD-2/liprin-α and the KIF1A/UNC-104 motor function in the same pathway to regulate SV transport. Our data support a model in which the SV protein SAM-4 regulates the processivity of SV transport.     

Signaling for Vesicle Mobilization and Synaptic Plasticity

The hypothesis that release of classical neurotransmitters and neuropeptides is facilitated by increasing the mobility of small synaptic vesicles (SSVs) and dense core vesicles (DCVs) could not be tested until the advent of methods for visualizing these secretory vesicles in living nerve terminals. In fact, fluorescence imaging studies have only since 2005 established that activity increases secretory vesicle mobility in motoneuron terminals and chromaffin cells. Mobilization of DCVs and SSVs appears to be due to liberation of hindered vesicles to promote quicker diffusion. However, F-actin and synapsin, which have been featured in mobilization models, are not required for activity-dependent increases in the mobility of DCVs or SSVs. Most recently, the signaling required for sustained mobilization has been identified for Drosophila motoneuron DCVs and shown to increase synaptic transmission. Specifically, presynaptic endoplasmic reticulum ryanodine receptor-mediated Ca2+ release activates Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II to mobilize DCVs and induce post-tetanic potentiation (PTP) of neuropeptide release in the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. The shared signaling for increasing vesicle mobility and PTP links vesicle mobilization and synaptic plasticity.     

Fusion of Endosomes Involved in Synaptic Vesicle Recycling

Recycling of vesicles of the regulated secretory pathway presumably involves passage through an early endosomal compartment as an intermediate step. To learn more about the involvement of endosomes in the recycling of synaptic and secretory vesicles we studied in vitro fusion of early endosomes derived from pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells. Fusion was not affected by cleavage of the SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) proteins synaptobrevin and syntaxin 1 that operate at the exocytotic limb of the pathway. Furthermore, fusion was inhibited by the fast Ca²⁺ chelator 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N′,N′-tetra-acetic acid but not by the slow Ca²⁺ chelator EGTA. Endosome fusion was restored by the addition of Ca²⁺ with an optimum at a free Ca²⁺ concentration of 0.3 × 10⁻⁶ M. Other divalent cations did not substitute for Ca²⁺. A membrane-permeant EGTA derivative caused inhibition of fusion, which was reversed by addition of Ca²⁺. We conclude that the fusion of early endosomes participating in the recycling of synaptic and neurosecretory vesicles is mediated by a set of SNAREs distinct from those involved in exocytosis and requires the local release of Ca²⁺ from the endosomal interior.     

Synaptic Vesicle Generation from Central Nerve Terminal Endosomes

Central nerve terminals contain a small number of synaptic vesicles (SVs) that must sustain the fidelity of neurotransmission across a wide range of stimulation intensities. For this to be achieved, nerve terminals integrate a number of complementary endocytosis modes whose activation spans the breadth of these neuronal stimulation patterns. Two such modes are ultrafast endocytosis and activity‐dependent bulk endocytosis, which are triggered by stimuli at either end of the physiological range. Both endocytosis modes generate endosomes directly from the nerve terminal plasma membrane, before the subsequent production of SVs from these structures. This review will discuss the current knowledge relating to the molecular mechanisms involved in the generation of SVs from nerve terminal endosomes, how this relates to other mechanisms of SV production and the functional role of such SVs.      

Tomosyn Inhibits Synaptic Vesicle Priming in Caenorhabditis elegans

Caenorhabditis elegans TOM-1 is orthologous to vertebrate tomosyn, a cytosolic syntaxin-binding protein implicated in the modulation of both constitutive and regulated exocytosis. To investigate how TOM-1 regulates exocytosis of synaptic vesicles in vivo, we analyzed C. elegans tom-1 mutants. Our electrophysiological analysis indicates that evoked postsynaptic responses at tom-1 mutant synapses are prolonged leading to a two-fold increase in total charge transfer. The enhanced response in tom-1 mutants is not associated with any detectable changes in postsynaptic response kinetics, neuronal outgrowth, or synaptogenesis. However, at the ultrastructural level, we observe a concomitant increase in the number of plasma membrane-contacting vesicles in tom-1 mutant synapses, a phenotype reversed by neuronal expression of TOM-1. Priming defective unc-13 mutants show a dramatic reduction in plasma membrane-contacting vesicles, suggesting these vesicles largely represent the primed vesicle pool at the C. elegans neuromuscular junction. Consistent with this conclusion, hyperosmotic responses in tom-1 mutants are enhanced, indicating the primed vesicle pool is enhanced. Furthermore, the synaptic defects of unc-13 mutants are partially suppressed in tom-1 unc-13 double mutants. These data indicate that in the intact nervous system, TOM-1 negatively regulates synaptic vesicle priming.     

Studying Synaptic Vesicle Pools using Photoconversion of Styryl Dyes

The fusion of synaptic vesicles with the plasma membrane (exocytosis) is a required step in neurotransmitter release and neuronal communication. The vesicles are then retrieved from the plasma membrane (endocytosis) and grouped together with the general pool of vesicles within the nerve terminal, until they undergo a new exo- and endocytosis cycle (vesicle recycling). These processes have been studied using a variety of techniques such as electron microscopy, electrophysiology recordings, amperometry and capacitance measurements. Importantly, during the last two decades a number of fluorescently labeled markers emerged, allowing optical techniques to track vesicles in their recycling dynamics. One of the most commonly used markers is the styryl or FM dye ¹; structurally, all FM dyes contain a hydrophilic head and a lipophilic tail connected through an aromatic ring and one or more double bonds (Fig. 1B). A classical FM dye experiment to label a pool of vesicles consists in bathing the preparation (Fig. 1Ai) with the dye during the stimulation of the nerve (electrically or with high K⁺). This induces vesicle recycling and the subsequent loading of the dye into recently endocytosed vesicles (Fig. 1A_i-iii). After loading the vesicles with dye, a second round of stimulation in a dye-free bath would trigger the FM release through exocytosis (Fig. 1A_iv-v), process that can be followed by monitoring the fluorescence intensity decrease (destaining). Although FM dyes have contributed greatly to the field of vesicle recycling, it is not possible to determine the exact localization or morphology of individual vesicles by using conventional fluorescence microscopy. For that reason, we explain here how FM dyes can also be used as endocytic markers using electron microscopy, through photoconversion. The photoconversion technique exploits the property of fluorescent dyes to generate reactive oxygen species under intense illumination. Fluorescently labeled preparations are submerged in a solution containing diaminobenzidine (DAB) and illuminated. Reactive species generated by the dye molecules oxidize the DAB, which forms a stable, insoluble precipitate that has a dark appearance and can be easily distinguished in electron microscopy ^2,3. As DAB is only oxidized in the immediate vicinity of fluorescent molecules (as the reactive oxygen species are short-lived), the technique ensures that only fluorescently labeled structures are going to contain the electron-dense precipitate. The technique thus allows the study of the exact location and morphology of actively recycling organelles.Open in a separate windowClick here to view.^{(49M, flv)}     

High- and Low-Mobility Stages in the Synaptic Vesicle Cycle

Synaptic vesicles need to be mobile to reach their release sites during synaptic activity. We investigated vesicle mobility throughout the synaptic vesicle cycle using both conventional and subdiffraction-resolution stimulated emission depletion fluorescence microscopy. Vesicle tracking revealed that recently endocytosed synaptic vesicles are highly mobile for a substantial time period after endocytosis. They later undergo a maturation process and integrate into vesicle clusters where they exhibit little mobility. Despite the differences in mobility, both recently endocytosed and mature vesicles are exchanged between synapses. Electrical stimulation does not seem to affect the mobility of the two types of vesicles. After exocytosis, the vesicle material is mobile in the plasma membrane, although the movement appears to be somewhat limited. Increasing the proportion of fused vesicles (by stimulating exocytosis while simultaneously blocking endocytosis) leads to substantially higher mobility. We conclude that both high- and low-mobility states are characteristic of synaptic vesicle movement.     

Synaptic Vesicle Proteins and Neuronal Plasticity in Adrenergic Neurons

The neurons in the superior cervical ganglion are active in plasticity and re-modelling in order to adapt to requirements. However, so far, only a few studies dealing with synaptic vesicle related proteins during adaptive processes have been published. In the present paper, changes in content and expression of the synaptic vesicle related proteins in the neurons after decentralization (cutting the cervical sympathetic trunk) or axotomy (cutting the internal and external carotid nerves) were studied. Immunofluorescence studies were carried out using antibodies and antisera against integral membrane proteins, vesicle associated proteins, NPY, and the enzymes TH and PNMT. For colocalization studies, the sections were simultaneously double labelled. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used for colocalization studies as well as for semi-quantification analysis, using the computer software. Westen blot analysis, in situ 3'-end DNA labelling, and in situ hybridization were also employed. After decentralization of the ganglia several of the synaptic vesicle proteins (synaptotagmin I, synaptophysin, SNAP-25, CLC and GAP-43) were increased in the iris nerve terminal network, but with different time patterns, while TH-immunoreactivity had clearly decreased. In the ganglia, these proteins had decreased at 1 day after decentralization, probably due to degeneration of the pre-ganglionic nerve fibres and terminals. At later intervals, these proteins, except SNAP-25, had increased in the nerve fibre bundles and re-appeared in nerve fibres outlining the principal neurons.