Timing and Regulation of Nuclear and Cortical Events in the Cell Cycle of Tetrahymena pyriformis*

SYNOPSIS. Using continuous flow cultures based on the chemostat principle, we varied the cell generation times of the ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis strain GL, from 4.9 to 22.2 hr and studied various parameters of the cell cycle at 28 C. These included: the duration of the periods required for oral morphogenesis, macronuclear division, cell division, G₁ S, and G₂. The size of individual cells was also measured. Independent of the growth rate, the period of oral morphogenesis occurred during the last 90 min of the cell cycle. In all cases macronuclear and cell divisions took place during the last part of these 90 min, and the final macronuclear separation occurred just before final cell separation. The S-period increased slightly, while the G₁ and G₂ both increased in roughly the same relative proportion to the increasing generation times. Slowly growing cells (generation time 20.5 hr) were shorter but broader and somewhat larger in volume than quickly growing cells (generation time 4.9 hr).     

Translational control of lipogenic enzymes in the cell cycle of synchronous,growing yeast cells

Translational control during cell division determines when cells start a new cell cycle, how fast they complete it, the number of successive divisions, and how cells coordinate proliferation with available nutrients. The translational efficiencies of mRNAs in cells progressing synchronously through the mitotic cell cycle, while preserving the coupling of cell division with cell growth, remain uninvestigated. We now report comprehensive ribosome profiling of a yeast cell size series from the time of cell birth, to identify mRNAs under periodic translational control. The data reveal coordinate translational activation of mRNAs encoding lipogenic enzymes late in the cell cycle including Acc1p, the rate‐limiting enzyme acetyl‐CoA carboxylase. An upstream open reading frame (uORF) confers the translational control of ACC1 and adjusts Acc1p protein levels in different nutrients. The ACC1 uORF is relevant for cell division because its ablation delays cell cycle progression, reduces cell size, and suppresses the replicative longevity of cells lacking the Sch9p protein kinase regulator of ribosome biogenesis. These findings establish an unexpected relationship between lipogenesis and protein synthesis in mitotic cell divisions.     

The plant cell cycle

The first aim of this paper is to review recent progress in identifying genes in plants homologous to cell division cycle (cdc) genes of fission yeast. In the latter, cdc genes are well-characterised. Arguably, most is known about cdc2 which encodes a 34 kDa protein kinase (p34^cdc2) that functions at the G2-M and G1-S transition points of the cell cycle. At G2-M, the p34^cdc2 protein kinase is regulated by a number of gene products that function in independent regulatory pathways. The cdc2 kinase is switched on by a phosphatase encoded by cdc25, and switched off by a protein kinase encoded by weel. p34 Must also bind with a cyclin protein to form maturation promoting factor before exhibiting protein kinase activity. In plants, homologues to p34^cdc2 have been identified in pea, wheat, Arabidopsis, alfalfa, maize and Chlamydomonas. They all exhibit the PSTAIRE motif, an absolutely conserved amino acid sequence in all functional homologues sequenced so far. As in animals, some plant species contain more than one cdc2 protein kinase gene. but in contrast to animals where one functions at G2-M and the other (CDK2 in humans and Egl in Xenopus) at G1-S, it is still unclear whether there are functional differences between the plant p34^cdc2 protein kinases. Again, whereas in animals cyclins are well characterised on the basis of sequence analysis, into class A, class B (G2-M) and CLN (G1 cyclins), cyclins isolated from several plant species cannot be so clearly characterised. The differences between plant and animal homologues to p34^cdc2 and cyclins raises the possibility that some of the regulatory controls of the plant genes may be different from those of their animal counterparts. The second aim of the paper is to review how planes of cell division and cell size are regulated at the molecular level. We focus on reports showing that p34^cdc2 binds to the preprophase band (ppb) in late G2 of the cell cycle. The binding of p34^cdc2 to ppbs may be important in regulating changes in directional growth but, more importantly, there is a requirement to understand what controls the positioning of ppbs. Thus, we highlight work resolving proteins such as the microtubule associated proteins (MAPs) and those mitogen activated protein kinases (MAP kinases), which act on, or bind to, mitotic microtubules. Plant homologues to MAP kinases have been identified in alfalfa. Finally, some consideration is given to cell size at division and how alterations in cell size can alter plant development. Transgenic tobacco plants expressing the fission yeast gene, cdc25, exhibited various perturbations of development and a reduced cell size at division. Hence, cdc25 affected the cell cycle (and as a consequence, cell size at division) and cdc25 expression was correlated with various alterations to development including precocious flowering and altered floral morphogenesis. Our view is that the cell cycle is a growth cycle in which a cell achieves an optimal size for division and that this size control has an important bearing on differentiation and development. Understanding how cell size is controlled, and how plant cdc genes are regulated, will be essential keys to ‘the cell cycle locks’, which when ‘opened’, will provide further clues about how the cell cycle is linked to plant development.     

The Bacterial Cell Cycle: DNA Replication,Nucleoid Segregation,and Cell Division

Data on the bacterial cell cycle published in the last 10–15 years are considered, with a special stress on studies of nucleoid segregation between dividing cells. The degree of similarity between the eukaryotic mitotic apparatus and the apparatus performing nucleoid separation is discussed.__________Translated from Mikrobiologiya, Vol. 74, No. 4, 2005, pp. 437–451.Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Prozorov.     

Cycling in a crowd: Coordination of plant cell division,growth, and cell fate

The reiterative organogenesis that drives plant growth relies on the constant production of new cells, which remain encased by interconnected cell walls. For these reasons, plant morphogenesis strictly depends on the rate and orientation of both cell division and cell growth. Important progress has been made in recent years in understanding how cell cycle progression and the orientation of cell divisions are coordinated with cell and organ growth and with the acquisition of specialized cell fates. We review basic concepts and players in plant cell cycle and division, and then focus on their links to growth-related cues, such as metabolic state, cell size, cell geometry, and cell mechanics, and on how cell cycle progression and cell division are linked to specific cell fates. The retinoblastoma pathway has emerged as a major player in the coordination of the cell cycle with both growth and cell identity, while microtubule dynamics are central in the coordination of oriented cell divisions. Future challenges include clarifying feedbacks between growth and cell cycle progression, revealing the molecular basis of cell division orientation in response to mechanical and chemical signals, and probing the links between cell fate changes and chromatin dynamics during the cell cycle.

Plant cell cycle and division are linked to specific cell fates and respond to growth-related cues, such as metabolic state, cell size, cell shape, and mechanical stress.     

Behavior of leucoplast nucleoids in the epidermal cell of onion (Allium cepa) bulb

Summary The behavior of nucleoids during the leucoplast division cycle in the epidermis of onion (Allium cepa) bulbs was investigated using DNA-specific fluorochrome 4'6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining. The leucoplast was morphologically amoeboid and continuously changed its shape. A dumbbell-shaped leucoplast divided into two spherical daughter ones by constriction in the middle region of the body. Leucoplasts contained 4–10 mostly spherical, oval, partly rodand dumbbell-shaped nucleoids which were dispersed within the bodies. The proportion of one DNA molecule of a T4 phage particle to the small leucoplast nucleoid in the grain density of negative film was 1 to 0.91. Comparison of the present result and another groups' biochemical results suggested that a small leucoplast nucleoid contains one DNA molecule. The dumbbell-shaped leucoplast probably before division contained about twice as many nucleoids as the spherical leucoplast after division, and each half of the dumbbell contained about half the number of nucleoids. Nucleoids increased in number with growth of the leucoplast. The behavior of nucleoids during the leucoplast division cycle in onion bulbs was basically similar to that during the chloroplast division cycle in higher plants and green algae, which was previously reported (Kuroiwa et al. 1981 b).     

Replication fork passage drives asymmetric dynamics of a critical nucleoid‐associated protein in Caulobacter

In bacteria, chromosome dynamics and gene expression are modulated by nucleoid‐associated proteins (NAPs), but little is known about how NAP activity is coupled to cell cycle progression. Using genomic techniques, quantitative cell imaging, and mathematical modeling, our study in Caulobacter crescentus identifies a novel NAP (GapR) whose activity over the cell cycle is shaped by DNA replication. GapR activity is critical for cellular function, as loss of GapR causes severe, pleiotropic defects in growth, cell division, DNA replication, and chromosome segregation. GapR also affects global gene expression with a chromosomal bias from origin to terminus, which is associated with a similar general bias in GapR binding activity along the chromosome. Strikingly, this asymmetric localization cannot be explained by the distribution of GapR binding sites on the chromosome. Instead, we present a mechanistic model in which the spatiotemporal dynamics of GapR are primarily driven by the progression of the replication forks. This model represents a simple mechanism of cell cycle regulation, in which DNA‐binding activity is intimately linked to the action of DNA replication.     

Loss of growth homeostasis by genetic decoupling of cell division from biomass growth: implication for size control mechanisms

Growing cells adjust their division time with biomass accumulation to maintain growth homeostasis. Size control mechanisms, such as the size checkpoint, provide an inherent coupling of growth and division by gating certain cell cycle transitions based on cell size. We describe genetic manipulations that decouple cell division from cell size, leading to the loss of growth homeostasis, with cells becoming progressively smaller or progressively larger until arresting. This was achieved by modulating glucose influx independently of external glucose. Division rate followed glucose influx, while volume growth was largely defined by external glucose. Therefore, the coordination of size and division observed in wild‐type cells reflects tuning of two parallel processes, which is only refined by an inherent feedback‐dependent coupling. We present a class of size control models explaining the observed breakdowns of growth homeostasis.     

Direct interaction of FtsZ and MreB is required for septum synthesis and cell division in Escherichia coli

How bacteria coordinate cell growth with division is not well understood. Bacterial cell elongation is controlled by actin–MreB while cell division is governed by tubulin–FtsZ. A ring‐like structure containing FtsZ (the Z ring) at mid‐cell attracts other cell division proteins to form the divisome, an essential protein assembly required for septum synthesis and cell separation. The Z ring exists at mid‐cell during a major part of the cell cycle without contracting. Here, we show that MreB and FtsZ of Escherichia coli interact directly and that this interaction is required for Z ring contraction. We further show that the MreB–FtsZ interaction is required for transfer of cell‐wall biosynthetic enzymes from the lateral to the mature divisome, allowing cells to synthesise the septum. Our observations show that bacterial cell division is coupled to cell elongation via a direct and essential interaction between FtsZ and MreB.     

Nucleoid occlusion protein Noc recruits DNA to the bacterial cell membrane

To proliferate efficiently, cells must co‐ordinate division with chromosome segregation. In Bacillus subtilis, the nucleoid occlusion protein Noc binds to specific DNA sequences (NBSs) scattered around the chromosome and helps to protect genomic integrity by coupling the initiation of division to the progression of chromosome replication and segregation. However, how it inhibits division has remained unclear. Here, we demonstrate that Noc associates with the cell membrane via an N‐terminal amphipathic helix, which is necessary for function. Importantly, the membrane‐binding affinity of this helix is weak and requires the assembly of nucleoprotein complexes, thus establishing a mechanism for DNA‐dependent activation of Noc. Furthermore, division inhibition by Noc requires recruitment of NBS DNA to the cell membrane and is dependent on its ability to bind DNA and membrane simultaneously. Indeed, Noc production in a heterologous system is sufficient for recruitment of chromosomal DNA to the membrane. Our results suggest a simple model in which the formation of large membrane‐associated nucleoprotein complexes physically occludes assembly of the division machinery.     

Linking cell division to cell growth in a spatiotemporal model of the cell cycle

Cell division must be tightly coupled to cell growth in order to maintain cell size, yet the mechanisms linking these two processes are unclear. It is known that almost all proteins involved in cell division shuttle between cytoplasm and nucleus during the cell cycle; however, the implications of this process for cell cycle dynamics and its coupling to cell growth remains to be elucidated. We developed mathematical models of the cell cycle which incorporate protein translocation between cytoplasm and nucleus. We show that protein translocation between cytoplasm and nucleus not only modulates temporal cell cycle dynamics, but also provides a natural mechanism coupling cell division to cell growth. This coupling is mediated by the effect of cytoplasmic-to-nuclear size ratio on the activation threshold of critical cell cycle proteins, leading to the size-sensing checkpoint (sizer) and the size-independent clock (timer) observed in many cell cycle experiments.     

Bacterial cell division: regulating Z-ring formation

The earliest stage of cell division in bacteria is the formation of a Z ring, composed of a polymer of the FtsZ protein, at the division site. Z rings appear to be synthesized in a bi‐directional manner from a nucleation site (NS) located on the inside of the cytoplasmic membrane. It is the utilization of a NS specifically at the site of septum formation that determines where and when division will occur. However, a Z ring can be made to form at positions other than at the division site. How does a cell regulate utilization of a NS at the correct location and at the right time? In rod‐shaped bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, two factors involved in this regulation are the Min system and nucleoid occlusion. It is suggested that in B. subtilis, the main role of the Min proteins is to inhibit division at the nucleoid‐free cell poles. In E. coli it is currently not clear whether the Min system can direct a Z ring to the division site at mid‐cell or whether its main role is to ensure that division inhibition occurs away from mid‐cell, a role analogous to that in B. subtilis. While the nucleoid negatively influences Z‐ring formation in its vicinity in these rod‐shaped organisms, the exact relationship between nucleoid occlusion and the ability to form a mid‐cell Z ring is unresolved. Recent evidence suggests that in B. subtilis and Caulobacter crescentus, utilization of the NS at the division site is intimately linked to the progress of a round of chromosome replication and this may form the basis of achieving co‐ordination between chromosome replication and cell division.     

The RNA helicase,eIF4A‐1, is required for ovule development and cell size homeostasis in Arabidopsis

eIF4A is a highly conserved RNA‐stimulated ATPase and helicase involved in the initiation of mRNA translation. The Arabidopsis genome encodes two isoforms, one of which (eIF4A‐1) is required for the coordination between cell cycle progression and cell size. A T‐DNA mutant eif4a1 line, with reduced eIF4A protein levels, displays slow growth, reduced lateral root formation, delayed flowering and abnormal ovule development. Loss of eIF4A‐1 reduces the proportion of mitotic cells in the root meristem and perturbs the relationship between cell size and cell cycle progression. Several cell cycle reporter proteins, particularly those expressed at G2/M, have reduced expression in eif4a1 mutant meristems. Single eif4a1 mutants are semisterile and show aberrant ovule growth, whereas double eif4a1 eif4a2 homozygous mutants could not be recovered, indicating that eIF4A function is essential for plant growth and development.     

Variation of the folding and dynamics of the Escherichia coli chromosome with growth conditions

We examine whether the Escherichia coli chromosome is folded into a self‐adherent nucleoprotein complex, or alternately is a confined but otherwise unconstrained self‐avoiding polymer. We address this through in vivo visualization, using an inducible GFP fusion to the nucleoid‐associated protein Fis to non‐specifically decorate the entire chromosome. For a range of different growth conditions, the chromosome is a compact structure that does not fill the volume of the cell, and which moves from the new pole to the cell centre. During rapid growth, chromosome segregation occurs well before cell division, with daughter chromosomes coupled by a thin inter‐daughter filament before complete segregation, whereas during slow growth chromosomes stay adjacent until cell division occurs. Image correlation analysis indicates that sub‐nucleoid structure is stable on a 1 min timescale, comparable to the timescale for redistribution time measured for GFP–Fis after photobleaching. Optical deconvolution and writhe calculation analysis indicate that the nucleoid has a large‐scale coiled organization rather than being an amorphous mass. Our observations are consistent with the chromosome having a self‐adherent filament organization.     

The Arabidopsis SMO2, a homologue of yeast TRM112, modulates progression of cell division during organ growth

Cell proliferation is integrated into developmental progression in multicellular organisms, including plants, and the regulation of cell division is of pivotal importance for plant growth and development. Here, we report the identification of an Arabidopsis SMALL ORGAN 2 (SMO2) gene that functions in regulation of the progression of cell division during organ growth. The smo2 knockout mutant displays reduced size of aerial organs and shortened roots, due to the decreased number of cells in these organs. Further analyses reveal that disruption of SMO2 does not alter the developmental timing but reduces the rate of cell production during leaf and root growth. Moreover, smo2 plants exhibit a constitutive activation of cell cycle‐related genes and over‐accumulation of cells expressing CYCB1;1:β‐glucuronidase (CYCB1;1:GUS) during organogenesis, suggesting that smo2 has a defect in G₂–M phase progression in the cell cycle. SMO2 encodes a functional homologue of yeast TRM112, a plurifunctional component involved in a few cellular events, including tRNA and protein methylation. In addition, the mutation of SMO2 does not appear to affect endoreduplication in Arabidopsis leaf cells. Taken together we postulate that Arabidopsis SMO2 is a conserved yeast TRM112 homologue and SMO2‐mediated cellular events are required for proper progression of cell division in plant growth and development.     

Noc protein binds to specific DNA sequences to coordinate cell division with chromosome segregation

Coordination of chromosome segregation and cytokinesis is crucial for efficient cell proliferation. In Bacillus subtilis, the nucleoid occlusion protein Noc protects the chromosomes by associating with the chromosome and preventing cell division in its vicinity. Using protein localization, ChAP‐on‐Chip and bioinformatics, we have identified a consensus Noc‐binding DNA sequence (NBS), and have shown that Noc is targeted to about 70 discrete regions scattered around the chromosome, though absent from a large region around the replication terminus. Purified Noc bound specifically to an NBS in vitro. NBSs inserted near the replication terminus bound Noc–YFP and caused a delay in cell division. An autonomous plasmid carrying an NBS array recruited Noc–YFP and conferred a severe Noc‐dependent inhibition of cell division. This shows that Noc is a potent inhibitor of division, but that its activity is strictly localized by the interaction with NBS sites in vivo. We propose that Noc serves not only as a spatial regulator of cell division to protect the nucleoid, but also as a timing device with an important role in the coordination of chromosome segregation and cell division.     

Single‐molecule tracking reveals that the nucleoid‐associated protein HU plays a dual role in maintaining proper nucleoid volume through differential interactions with chromosomal DNA

HU (Histone‐like protein from Escherichia coli strain U93) is the most conserved nucleoid‐associated protein in eubacteria, but how it impacts global chromosome organization is poorly understood. Using single‐molecule tracking, we demonstrate that HU exhibits nonspecific, weak, and transitory interactions with the chromosomal DNA. These interactions are largely mediated by three conserved, surface‐exposed lysine residues (triK), which were previously shown to be responsible for nonspecific binding to DNA. The loss of these weak, transitory interactions in a HUα(triKA) mutant results in an over‐condensed and mis‐segregated nucleoid. Mutating a conserved proline residue (P63A) in the HUα subunit, deleting the HUβ subunit, or deleting nucleoid‐associated naRNAs, each previously implicated in HU’s high‐affinity binding to kinked or cruciform DNA, leads to less dramatically altered interacting dynamics of HU compared to the HUα(triKA) mutant, but highly expanded nucleoids. Our results suggest HU plays a dual role in maintaining proper nucleoid volume through its differential interactions with chromosomal DNA. On the one hand, HU compacts the nucleoid through specific DNA structure‐binding interactions. On the other hand, it decondenses the nucleoid through many nonspecific, weak, and transitory interactions with the bulk chromosome. Such dynamic interactions may contribute to the viscoelastic properties and fluidity of the bacterial nucleoid to facilitate proper chromosome functions.     

Competition between DivIVA and the nucleoid for ParA binding promotes segrosome separation and modulates mycobacterial cell elongation

Although mycobacteria are rod shaped and divide by simple binary fission, their cell cycle exhibits unusual features: unequal cell division producing daughter cells that elongate with different velocities, as well as asymmetric chromosome segregation and positioning throughout the cell cycle. As in other bacteria, mycobacterial chromosomes are segregated by pair of proteins, ParA and ParB. ParA is an ATPase that interacts with nucleoprotein ParB complexes – segrosomes and non‐specifically binds the nucleoid. Uniquely in mycobacteria, ParA interacts with a polar protein DivIVA (Wag31), responsible for asymmetric cell elongation, however the biological role of this interaction remained unknown. We hypothesised that this interaction plays a critical role in coordinating chromosome segregation with cell elongation. Using a set of ParA mutants, we determined that disruption of ParA‐DNA binding enhanced the interaction between ParA and DivIVA, indicating a competition between the nucleoid and DivIVA for ParA binding. Having identified the ParA mutation that disrupts its recruitment to DivIVA, we found that it led to inefficient segrosomes separation and increased the cell elongation rate. Our results suggest that ParA modulates DivIVA activity. Thus, we demonstrate that the ParA‐DivIVA interaction facilitates chromosome segregation and modulates cell elongation.