In vitro assays for the determination of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase editing activity

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are essential enzymes that help to ensure the fidelity of protein translation by accurately aminoacylating (or "charging") specific tRNA substrates with cognate amino acids. Many synthetases have an additional catalytic activity to confer amino acid editing or proofreading. This activity relieves ambiguities during translation of the genetic code that result from one synthetase activating multiple amino acid substrates. In this review, we describe methods that have been developed for assaying both pre- and post-transfer editing activities. Pre-transfer editing is defined as hydrolysis of a misactivated aminoacyl-adenylate prior to transfer to the tRNA. This reaction has been reported to occur either in the aminoacylation active site or in a separate editing domain. Post-transfer editing refers to the hydrolysis reaction that cleaves the aminoacyl-ester linkage formed between the carbonyl carbon of the amino acid and the 2' or 3' hydroxyl group of the ribose on the terminal adenosine. Post-transfer editing takes place in a hydrolytic active site that is distinct from the site of amino acid activation. Here, we focus on methods for determination of steady-state reaction rates using editing assays developed for both classes of synthetases.     

两种具有调节血管生成作用的氨基酰-tRNA合成酶

氨基酰-tRNA合成酶是生物体内蛋白质合成过程中的一类关键酶,它催化体内tRNA的氨基酰化反应.作为一类古老的蛋白质,氨基酰-tRNA合成酶在其漫长的进化过程中,通过其他结构域的插入或融合逐渐演化出许多新的功能.最近的研究结果表明,人酪氨酰-tRNA合成酶的片段具有促进血管生成的功能,而人色氨酰-tRNA合成酶的片段则具有抑制血管生长的功能.在哺乳动物细胞中,蛋白质的生物合成途径与细胞信号转导途径紧密相连.今后,随着对氨基酰-tRNA合成酶研究的不断深入,可以通过它们与细胞因子和信号转导相连的功能治疗人类的疾病.     

1 New biology from ancient enzymes

The aminoacyl tRNA synthetases arose early in evolution to establish the genetic code during translation. Long thought of as cytoplasmic enzymes with a single defined function, new studies have demonstrated their roles in nuclear and extracellular signaling pathways, where they regulate angiogenesis, inflammation, mTor signaling, tumorigenesis, and more. These novel functions are typically associated with novel domains added to higher eukaryote tRNA synthetases, and specific resected forms that are generated by alternative splicing and natural proteolysis. The tRNA synthetases are now seen as central “nodes” that use their novel domains to connect with multiple-cell signaling pathways through a variety of interacting partners. These partners include nuclear proteins, extracellular receptors, cytoplasmic proteins, and cellular RNAs. This new biology from tRNA synthetases is an endless frontier.     

Novel regulatory interactions and activities of mammalian tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) catalyze the attachment of specific amino acids to their cognate tRNAs, thereby ensuring the faithful translation of genetic code. In addition to their enzymatic function, these enzymes have been discovered to regulate various cellular functions such as tRNA export, ribosomal RNA synthesis, apoptosis, inflammation and angiogenesis in mammalian. The insights into the noncanonical activities of these enzymes have been obtained from their unique cellular localization, interacting partners, isoform generation and expression control. Mammalian ARSs also form a macromolecular protein complex with a few auxiliary factors. Although the physiological significance of this complex is poorly understood, it also supports the potential of mammalian ARSs as sophisticated multifunctional proteins for regulating various cellular procedures. In this review, the novel regulatory activities of mammalian ARSs will be discussed in different biological processes.     

The fidelity of the translation of the genetic code.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases play a central role in maintaining accuracy during the translation of the genetic code. To achieve this challenging task they have to discriminate against amino acids that are very closely related not only in structure but also in chemical nature. A 'double-sieve' editing model was proposed in the late seventies to explain how two closely related amino acids may be discriminated. However, a clear understanding of this mechanism required structural information on synthetases that are faced with such a problem of amino acid discrimination. The first structural basis for the editing model came recently from the crystal structure of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, a class I synthetase, which has to discriminate against valine. The structure showed the presence of two catalytic sites in the same enzyme, one for activation, a coarse sieve which binds both isoleucine and valine, and another for editing, a fine sieve which binds only valine and rejects isoleucine. Another structure of the enzyme in complex with tRNA showed that the tRNA is responsible for the translocation of the misactivated amino-acid substrate from the catalytic site to the editing site. These studies were mainly focused on class I synthetases and the situation was not clear about how class II enzymes discriminate against similar amino acids. The recent structural and enzymatic studies on threonyl-tRNA synthetase, a class II enzyme, reveal how this challenging task is achieved by using a unique zinc ion in the active site as well as by employing a separate domain for specific editing activity. These studies led us to propose a model which emphasizes the mirror symmetrical approach of the two classes of enzymes and highlights that tRNA is the key player in the evolution of these class of enzymes.     

氨酰-tRNA合成酶的研究进展

氨酰-tRNA合成酶催化特异的氨基酸与同源tRNA氨酰化,从而保证了遗传密码翻译的忠实性。这些古老而保守的蛋白质分子除了具有酶的功能外,在哺乳动物细胞中还发现了多种其他功能,具有重要的应用价值。在寻找具有全新作用机制的新抗生素以应对日益严重的抗生素耐药现象过程中,氨酰-tRNA合成酶是细菌蛋白质合成过程中重要的、新颖的靶标,成为关注的重点。定向突变的氨酰-tRNA合成酶可以用来定点掺入非天然氨基酸,扩展蛋白质工程。今后,随着人们对氨酰-tRNA合成酶研究的不断深入,它们还可能用来治疗肿瘤等多种疾病。     

Amino acid modifications on tRNA

The accurate formation of cognate aminoacyl-transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs) is essential for the fidelity of translation. Most amino acids are esterified onto their cognate tRNA isoacceptors directly by aa-tRNA synthetases. However, in the case of four amino acids (Gln, Asn, Cys and Sec), aminoacyl-tRNAs are made through indirect pathways in many organisms across all three domains of life. The process begins with the charging of noncognate amino acids to tRNAs by a specialized synthetase in the case of Cys-tRNA(Cys) formation or by synthetases with relaxed specificity, such as the non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA, non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA and seryl-tRNA synthetases. The resulting misacylated tRNAs are then converted to cognate pairs through transformation of the amino acids on the tRNA, which is catalyzed by a group of tRNA-dependent modifying enzymes, such as tRNA-dependent amidotransferases, Sep-tRNA:Cys-tRNA synthase, O-phosphoseryl-tRNA kinase and Sep-tRNA:Sec-tRNA synthase. The majority of these indirect pathways are widely spread in all domains of life and thought to be part of the evolutionary process.     

Regulated Capture by Exosomes of mRNAs for Cytoplasmic tRNA Synthetases

Although tRNA synthetases are enzymes that catalyze the first step of translation in the cytoplasm, surprising functions unrelated to translation have been reported. These studies, and the demonstration of novel activities of splice variants, suggest a far broader reach of tRNA synthetases into cell biology than previously recognized. Here we show that mRNAs for most tRNA synthetases can be detected in exosomes. Also detected in exosomes was an mRNA encoding a unique splice variant that others had associated with prostate cancer. The exosomal mRNAs encoding the native synthetase and its cancer-associated splice variant could be translated in vitro and in mammalian cells into stable proteins. Other results showed that selection by exosomes of the splice variant mRNA could be regulated by an external stimulus. Thus, a broad and diverse regulated pool of tRNA synthetase-derived mRNAs is packaged for genetic exchange.     

Eukaryotic tRNA sequences present conserved and amino acid-specific structural signatures

Metazoan organisms have many tRNA genes responsible for decoding amino acids. The set of all tRNA genes can be grouped in sets of common amino acids and isoacceptor tRNAs that are aminoacylated by corresponding aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Analysis of tRNA alignments shows that, despite the high number of tRNA genes, specific tRNA sequence motifs are highly conserved across multicellular eukaryotes. The conservation often extends throughout the isoacceptors and isodecoders with, in some cases, two sets of conserved isodecoders. This study is focused on non-Watson–Crick base pairs in the helical stems, especially GoU pairs. Each of the four helical stems may contain one or more conserved GoU pairs. Some are amino acid specific and could represent identity elements for the cognate aminoacyl tRNA synthetases. Other GoU pairs are found in more than a single amino acid and could be critical for native folding of the tRNAs. Interestingly, some GoU pairs are anticodon-specific, and others are found in phylogenetically-specific clades. Although the distribution of conservation likely reflects a balance between accommodating isotype-specific functions as well as those shared by all tRNAs essential for ribosomal translation, such conservations may indicate the existence of specialized tRNAs for specific translation targets, cellular conditions, or alternative functions.     

A tRNA aminoacylation system for non-natural amino acids based on a programmable ribozyme

The ability to recognize tRNA identities is essential to the function of the genetic coding system. In translation aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) recognize the identities of tRNAs and charge them with their cognate amino acids. We show that an in vitro evolved ribozyme can also discriminate between specific tRNAs, and can transfer amino acids to the 3' ends of cognate tRNAs. The ribozyme interacts with both the CCA-3' terminus and the anticodon loop of tRNA(fMet), and its tRNA specificity is controlled by these interactions. This feature allows us to program the selectivity of the ribozyme toward specific tRNAs, and therefore to tailor effective aminoacyl-transfer catalysts. This method potentially provides a means of generating aminoacyl tRNAs that are charged with non-natural amino acids, which could be incorporated into proteins through cell-free translation.     

Non‐canonical roles of tRNAs and tRNA mimics in bacterial cell biology

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are the macromolecules that transfer activated amino acids from aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases to the ribosome, where they are used for the mRNA guided synthesis of proteins. Transfer RNAs are ancient molecules, perhaps even predating the existence of the translation machinery. Albeit old, these molecules are tremendously conserved, a characteristic that is well illustrated by the fact that some bacterial tRNAs are efficient and specific substrates of eukaryotic aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases and ribosomes. Considering their ancient origin and high structural conservation, it is not surprising that tRNAs have been hijacked during evolution for functions outside of translation. These roles beyond translation include synthetic, regulatory and information functions within the cell. Here we provide an overview of the non‐canonical roles of tRNAs and their mimics in bacteria, and discuss some of the common themes that arise when comparing these different functions.     

Assembly of a class I tRNA synthetase from products of an artificially split gene

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases arose early in evolution and established the rules of the genetic code through their specific interactions with amino acids and RNA molecules. About half of these tRNA charging enzymes are class I synthetases, which contain similar N-terminal nucleotide-fold-like structures that are joined to variable domains implicated in specific protein-tRNA contacts. Here, we show that a bacterial synthetase gene can be split into two nonoverlapping segments. We split the gene for Escherichia coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase (a class I synthetase) at several sites near the interdomain junction, such that one segment codes for the nucleotide-fold-containing domain and the other provides determinants for tRNA recognition. When the segments are folded together, they can recognize and charge tRNA, both in vivo and in vitro. We postulate that an early step in the assembly of systems to attach amino acids to specific RNA molecules may have involved specific interactions between discrete proteins that is reflected in the interdomain contacts of modern synthetases.     

A viable amino acid editing activity in the leucyl-tRNA synthetase CP1-splicing domain is not required in the yeast mitochondria

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are a family of enzymes that are responsible for translating the genetic code in the first step of protein synthesis. Some aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have editing activities to clear their mistakes and enhance fidelity. Leucyl-tRNA synthetases have a hydrolytic active site that resides in a discrete amino acid editing domain called CP1. Mutational analysis within yeast mitochondrial leucyl-tRNA synthetase showed that the enzyme has maintained an editing active site that is competent for post-transfer editing of mischarged tRNA similar to other leucyl-tRNA synthetases. These mutations that altered or abolished leucyl-tRNA synthetase editing were introduced into complementation assays. Cell viability and mitochondrial function were largely unaffected in the presence of high levels of non-leucine amino acids. In contrast, these editing-defective mutations limited cell viability in Escherichia coli. It is possible that the yeast mitochondria have evolved to tolerate lower levels of fidelity in protein synthesis or have developed alternate mechanisms to enhance discrimination of leucine from non-cognate amino acids that can be misactivated by leucyl-tRNA synthetase.     

The case for an error minimizing set of coding amino acids

The fidelity of the translation machinery largely depends on the accuracy by which the tRNAs within the living cells are charged. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) attach amino acids to their cognate tRNAs ensuring the fidelity of translation in coding sequences. Based on the sequence analysis and catalytic domain structure, these enzymes are classified into two major groups of 10 enzymes each. In this study, we have generally tackled the role of aaRSs in decreasing the effects of mistranslations and consequently the evolution of the translation machinery. To this end, a fitness function was introduced in order to measure the accuracy by which each tRNA is charged with its cognate amino acid. Our results suggest that the aaRSs are very well optimized in "load minimization" based on their classes and their mechanisms in distinguishing the correct amino acids. Besides, our results support the idea that from an evolutionary point, a selectional pressure on the translational fidelity seems to be responsible in the occurrence of the 20 coding amino acids.     

On the Classes of Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases,Amino Acids and the Genetic Code

The division of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in two classes is compared with a division of the amino acids in two classes, obtained from the AAIndex databank by a principal component analysis. The division of the enzymes in Classes I and II follows to a great extent a division in the chemical and biological properties of their cognate amino acids. Furthermore, the phylogenetic trees of Classes I and II enzymes are highly correlated with dendrograms obtained for their cognate amino acids by using the indices in the AAIndex database. We argue that the evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases was determined by the characteristics of their corresponding amino acids. We interpret these results considering models for the origin and evolution of the genetic code in which an initial version, containing fewer amino acids, was modified by the incorporation of new amino acids following duplication and divergence of previous synthetases and tRNA molecules.     

In vitro selection of tRNAs for efficient four-base decoding to incorporate non-natural amino acids into proteins in an Escherichia coli cell-free translation system

Position-specific incorporation of non-natural amino acids into proteins is a useful technique in protein engineering. In this study, we established a novel selection system to obtain tRNAs that show high decoding activity, from a tRNA library in a cell-free translation system to improve the efficiency of incorporation of non-natural amino acids into proteins. In this system, a puromycin-tRNA conjugate, in which the 3'-terminal A unit was replaced by puromycin, was used. The puromycin-tRNA conjugate was fused to a C-terminus of streptavidin through the puromycin moiety in the ribosome. The streptavidin-puromycin-tRNA fusion molecule was collected and brought to the next round after amplification of the tRNA sequence. We applied this system to select efficient frameshift suppressor tRNAs from a tRNA library with a randomly mutated anticodon loop derived from yeast tRNA CCCG Phe. After three rounds of the selection, we obtained novel frameshift suppressor tRNAs which had high decoding activity and good orthogonality against endogenous aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. These results demonstrate that the in vitro selection system developed here is useful to obtain highly active tRNAs for the incorporation of non-natural amino acid from a tRNA library.     

Macromolecular synthesis in Streptomyces antibioticus: in vitro systems for aminoacylation and translation from young and old cells.

In vitro systems for the aminoacylation of transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) and for polypeptide synthesis have been constructed from young (12-h cultures, not producing actinomycin) and old (48-h cultures, producing actinomycin) cells of Streptomyces antibioticus. When Escherichia coli aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases were used to acylate S. antibioticus tRNA's, it was observed that, per absorbance unit of tRNA, the tRNA's from 48-h cells had a lower ability to accept the amino acids, leucine, serine, pheynlalanine, methionine, and valine than did the tRNA's from 12-h cells. Individual differences were observed between aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases from 12-h cells and those from 48-h cells with respect to the rate and extent of aminoacylation of E. coli tRNA with the five amino acids listed above. In vitro systems for the synthesis of polyphenylalanine have been constructed from 12- and 48-h cells. Ribsomes and soluble enzymes from 12-h cells are more efficient than those from 48-h cells in supporting polyphenylalanine synthesis, and, although the activity of both systems can be stimulated by the addition of E. coli tRNA, the higher level of incorporation observed in the unstimulated 12-h system (ribosomes and soluble enzymes) is maintained. Indeed, the difference in capacity for polyphenylalanine synthesis between in vitro systems from 12- and 48-h cells is greater when the systems are maximally stimulated by E. coli tRNA. Cross-mixing experiments reveal that enzymes from 48-h cells support a slightly higher level of polyphenylalanine synthesis than enzymes from 12-h cells with ribosomes from either cell type, and that the ribosomes are the primary agents responsible for the decreased efficiency of the in vito system from 48-h cells are compared with that from 12-h cells. To determine whether ribosome-associated factors were responsible for the relative inefficiency of the ribosomes from 48-h cells in translation, salt-washed ribosomes from 12- and 48-h cells were examined for their abilities to catalyze polyphenylalanine synthesis. Even after salt washing, ribosomes from 12-h cells were about five times higher in specific activity (counts per minute of polyphenylalanine synthesized per absorbance at 260 nm of ribosomes) than equivalent amounts of ribosomes from 48-h cells. Analysis of the proteins of salt-washed ribosomes of the two cell types by acrylamide gel electrophoresis suggests that the relative amounts of individual proteins present on ribosomes from 12-h cells are different from the amounts present on ribosomes from 48-h cells. These results are discussed in terms of the regulation of translation in S. antibioticus.     

Molecular network and functional implications of macromolecular tRNA synthetase complex

Understanding the complex network and multi-functionality of proteins is one of the main objectives of post-genome research. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) are the family of enzymes that are essential for cellular protein synthesis and viability that catalyze the attachment of specific amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. However, a lot of evidence has shown that these enzymes are multi-functional proteins that are involved in diverse cellular processes, such as tRNA processing, RNA splicing and trafficking, rRNA synthesis, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and inflammation. In addition, mammalian ARSs form a macromolecular complex with three auxiliary factors or with the elongation factor complex. Although the functional meaning and physiological significance of these complexes are poorly understood, recent data on the molecular interactions among the components for the multi-ARS complex are beginning to provide insights into the structural organization and cellular functions. In this review, the molecular mechanism for the assembly and functional implications of the multi-ARS complex will be discussed.     

Nucleotide triplet based molecular phylogeny of class I and class II aminoacyl t-RNA synthetase in three domain of life process: bacteria, archaea, and eukarya

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are one of the major protein components in the translation machinery. These essential proteins are found in all forms of life and are responsible for charging their cognate tRNAs with the correct amino acid. These important enzymes have been the subject of intense scientific inquiry for nearly half a century, but their complete evolutionary history has yet to emerge. Amino acids sequence based phylogeny has some limitation due to very low sequence similarity amongst the different tRNA synthetases and structure based phylogeny has also its limitation. In our study, tRNA nucleotide sequences of E. coli K12 (Bacteria), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Eukarya), Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1, and Archaeoglobus fulgidus DSM 4304 (Archaea) were used for phylogenetic analysis. Our results complement the observation with the earlier studies based on multiple sequence alignment and structural alignment. We observed that relationship between archaeal tRNA synthetases are different that of bacteria and eucarya. Violation of Class rule of LysRS is observed here also. The uniqueness of this method is that it does not employ sequence alignment of complete nucleotide sequence of the corresponding gene.