Differential dynamics of RAS isoforms in GDP‐ and GTP‐bound states

RAS subfamily proteins regulates cell growth promoting signaling processes by cycling between active (GTP‐bound) and inactive (GDP‐bound) states. Different RAS isoforms, though structurally similar, exhibit functional specificity and are associated with different types of cancers and developmental disorders. Understanding the dynamical differences between the isoforms is crucial for the design of inhibitors that can selectively target a particular malfunctioning isoform. In this study, we provide a comprehensive comparison of the dynamics of all the three RAS isoforms (HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS) using extensive molecular dynamics simulations in both the GDP‐ (total of 3.06 μs) and GTP‐bound (total of 2.4 μs) states. We observed significant differences in the dynamics of the isoforms, which rather interestingly, varied depending on the type of the nucleotide bound and the simulation temperature. Both SwitchI (Residues 25–40) and SwitchII (Residues 59–75) differ significantly in their flexibility in the three isoforms. Furthermore, Principal Component Analysis showed that there are differences in the conformational space sampled by the GTP‐bound RAS isoforms. We also identified a previously unreported pocket, which opens transiently during MD simulations, and can be targeted to regulate nucleotide exchange reaction or possibly interfere with membrane localization. Further, we present the first simulation study showing GDP destabilization in the wild‐type RAS protein. The destabilization of GDP/GTP occurred only in 1/50 simulations, emphasizing the need of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) to accelerate such an extremely unfavorable process. This observation along with the other results presented in this article further support our previously hypothesized mechanism of GEF‐assisted nucleotide exchange. Proteins 2015; 83:1091–1106. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Structure of Galpha(i1) bound to a GDP-selective peptide provides insight into guanine nucleotide exchange

Heterotrimeric G proteins are molecular switches that regulate numerous signaling pathways involved in cellular physiology. This characteristic is achieved by the adoption of two principal states: an inactive, GDP bound state and an active, GTP bound state. Under basal conditions, G proteins exist in the inactive, GDP bound state; thus, nucleotide exchange is crucial to the onset of signaling. Despite our understanding of G protein signaling pathways, the mechanism of nucleotide exchange remains elusive. We employed phage display technology to identify nucleotide state-dependent Galpha binding peptides. Herein, we report a GDP-selective Galpha binding peptide, KB-752, that enhances spontaneous nucleotide exchange of Galpha(i) subunits. Structural determination of the Galpha(i1)/peptide complex reveals unique changes in the Galpha switch regions predicted to enhance nucleotide exchange by creating a GDP dissociation route. Our results cast light onto a potential mechanism by which Galpha subunits adopt a conformation suitable for nucleotide exchange.     

Receptor‐Like Kinase Phosphorylation of Arabidopsis Heterotrimeric G‐Protein Gα ‐Subunit AtGPA1

As molecular on–off switches, heterotrimeric G protein complexes, comprised of a Gα subunit and an obligate Gβγ dimer, transmit extracellular signals received by G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) to cytoplasmic targets that respond to biotic and abiotic stimuli. Signal transduction is modulated by phosphorylation of GPCRs and G protein complexes. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the Gα subunit AtGPA1 is phosphorylated by the receptor‐like kinase (RLK) BRI1‐associated Kinase 1 (BAK1), but the extent that other RLKs phosphorylates AtGPA1 is unknown. Twenty‐two trans‐phosphorylation sites on AtGPA1 are mapped by 12 RLKs hypothesized to act in the Arabidopsis G protein signaling pathway. Cis‐phosphorylation sites are also identified on these RLKs, some newly shown to be dual specific kinases. Multiple sites are present in the core AtGPA1 functional units, including pSer52 and/or pThr53 of the conserved P‐loop that directly binds nucleotide/phosphate, pThr164, and pSer175 from αE helix in the intramolecular domain interface for nucleotide exchange and GTP hydrolysis, and pThr193 and/or pThr194 in Switch I (SwI) that coordinates nucleotide exchange and protein partner binding. Several AtGPA1 S/T phosphorylation sites are potentially nucleotide‐dependent phosphorylation patterns, such as Ser52/Thr53 in the P‐loop and Thr193 and/or Thr194 in SwI.     

Mechanism of the guanine nucleotide exchange reaction of Ras GTPase--evidence for a GTP/GDP displacement model

Ras GTPases function as binary switches in the signaling pathways controlling cell growth and differentiation by cycling between the inactive GDP-bound and the active GTP-bound states. They are activated through interaction with guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that catalyze the exchange of bound GDP with cytosolic GTP. In a conventional scheme, the biochemical roles of GEFs are postulated as stimulating the release of the bound GDP and stabilizing a nucleotide-free transition state of Ras. Herein we have examined in detail the catalyzed GDP/GTP exchange reaction mechanism by a Ras specific GEF, GRF1. In the absence of free nucleotide, GRF1 could not efficiently stimulate GDP dissociation from Ras. The release of the Ras-bound GDP was dependent upon the concentration and the structure of the incoming nucleotide, in particular, the hydrophobicity of the beta and gamma phosphate groups, suggesting that the GTP binding step is a prerequisite for GDP dissociation, is the rate-limiting step in the GEF reaction, or both. Using a pair of fluorescent guanine nucleotides (N-methylanthraniloyl GDP and 2',3'-O-(2,4,6-trinitrocyclohexadienylidene)-GTP) as donor and acceptor probes, we were able to detect fluorescence resonance energy transfer between the incoming GTP and the departing GDP on Ras under controlled kinetic conditions, providing evidence that there may exist a novel intermediate of the GEF-Ras complex that transiently binds to two nucleotides simultaneously. Furthermore, we found that Ras was capable of binding pyrophosphate (PPi) with a dissociation constant of 26 microM and that PPi and GMP, but neither alone, synergistically potentiated the GRF1-stimulated GDP dissociation from Ras. These results strongly support a GEF reaction mechanism by which nucleotide exchange occurs on Ras through a direct GTP/GDP displacement model.     

Trp fluorescence reveals an activation‐dependent cation‐π interaction in the Switch II region of Gαi proteins

Crystal structures of Gα_i (and closely related family member Gα_t) reveal much of what we currently know about G protein structure, including changes which occur in Switch regions. Gα_t exhibits a low rate of basal (uncatalyzed) nucleotide exchange and an ordered Switch II region in the GDP‐bound state, unlike Gα_i, which exhibits higher basal exchange and a disordered Switch II region in Gα_iGDP structures. Using purified Gα_i and Gα_t, we examined the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of these proteins, which reports conformational changes associated with activation and deactivation of Gα proteins. In addition to the expected enhancement in tryptophan fluorescence intensity, activation of GαGDP proteins was accompanied by a modest but notable red shift in tryptophan emission maxima. We identified a cation‐π interaction between tryptophan and arginine residues in the Switch II of Gα_i family proteins that mediates the observed red shift in emission maxima. Furthermore, amino‐terminal myristoylation of Gα_i resulted in a less polar environment for tryptophan residues in the GTPase domain, consistent with an interaction between the myristoylated amino terminus and the GTPase domain of Gα proteins. These results reveal unique insights into conformational changes which occur upon activation and deactivation of G proteins in solution.     

The Integrin‐Mediated ILK‐Parvin‐αPix Signaling Axis Controls Differentiation in Mammary Epithelial Cells

Epithelial cell adhesion to the surrounding extracellular matrix is necessary for their proper behavior and function. During pregnancy and lactation, mammary epithelial cells (MECs) receive signals from their interaction with laminin via β1‐integrin (β1‐itg) to establish apico‐basal polarity and to differentiate in response to prolactin. Downstream of β1‐itg, the scaffold protein Integrin Linked Kinase (ILK) has been identified as the key signal transducer that is required for both lactational differentiation and the establishment of apico‐basal polarity. ILK is an adaptor protein that forms the IPP complex with PINCH and Parvins, which are central to its adaptor functions. However, it is not known how ILK and its interacting partners control tissue‐specific gene expression. Expression of ILK mutants, which weaken the interaction between ILK and Parvin, revealed that Parvins have a role in mammary epithelial differentiation. This conclusion was supported by shRNA‐mediated knockdown of the Parvins. In addition, shRNA knockdown of the Parvin‐binding guanine nucleotide exchange factor αPix prevented prolactin‐induced differentiation. αPix depletion did not disrupt focal adhesions, MEC proliferation, or polarity. This suggests that αPix represents a differentiation‐specific bifurcation point in β1‐itg‐ILK adhesive signaling. In summary, this study has identified a new role for Parvin and αPix downstream of the integrin‐ILK signaling axis for MEC differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 231: 2408–2417, 2016. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Cellular Physiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Anaplasma phagocytophilum Rab10‐dependent parasitism of the trans‐Golgi network is critical for completion of the infection cycle

Anaplasma phagocytophilum is an emerging human pathogen and obligate intracellular bacterium. It inhabits a host cell‐derived vacuole and cycles between replicative reticulate cell (RC) and infectious dense‐cored (DC) morphotypes. Host–pathogen interactions that are critical for RC‐to‐DC conversion are undefined. We previously reported that A. phagocytophilum recruits green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐tagged Rab10, a GTPase that directs exocytic traffic from the sphingolipid‐rich trans‐Golgi network (TGN) to its vacuole in a guanine nucleotide‐independent manner. Here, we demonstrate that endogenous Rab10‐positive TGN vesicles are not only routed to but also delivered into the A. phagocytophilum‐occupied vacuole (ApV). Consistent with this finding, A. phagocytophilum incorporates sphingolipids while intracellular and retains them when naturally released from host cells. TGN vesicle delivery into the ApV is Rab10 dependent, up‐regulates expression of the DC‐specific marker, APH1235, and is critical for the production of infectious progeny. The A. phagocytophilum surface protein, uridine monophosphate kinase, was identified as a guanine nucleotide‐independent, Rab10‐specific ligand. These data delineate why Rab10 is important for the A. phagocytophilum infection cycle and expand the understanding of the benefits that exploiting host cell membrane traffic affords intracellular bacterial pathogens.     

Implications of non-canonical G-protein signaling for the immune system

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins), which consist of three subunits α, β, and γ, function as molecular switches to control downstream effector molecules activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The GTP/GDP binding status of Gα transmits information about the ligand binding state of the GPCR to intended signal transduction pathways. In immune cells heterotrimeric G proteins impact signal transduction pathways that directly, or indirectly, regulate cell migration, activation, survival, proliferation, and differentiation. The cells of the innate and adaptive immune system abundantly express chemoattractant receptors and lesser amounts of many other types of GPCRs. But heterotrimeric G-proteins not only function in classical GPCR signaling, but also in non-canonical signaling. In these pathways the guanine exchange factor (GEF) exerted by a GPCR in the canonical pathway is replaced or supplemented by another protein such as Ric-8A. In addition, other proteins such as AGS3-6 can compete with Gβγ for binding to GDP bound Gα. This competition can promote Gβγ signaling by freeing Gβγ from rapidly rebinding GDP bound Gα. The proteins that participate in these non-canonical signaling pathways will be briefly described and their role, or potential one, in cells of the immune system will be highlighted.     

Structural insights into the dual nucleotide exchange and GDI displacement activity of SidM/DrrA

GDP‐bound prenylated Rabs, sequestered by GDI (GDP dissociation inhibitor) in the cytosol, are delivered to destined sub‐cellular compartment and subsequently activated by GEFs (guanine nucleotide exchange factors) catalysing GDP‐to‐GTP exchange. The dissociation of GDI from Rabs is believed to require a GDF (GDI displacement factor). Only two RabGDFs, human PRA‐1 and Legionella pneumophila SidM/DrrA, have been identified so far and the molecular mechanism of GDF is elusive. Here, we present the structure of a SidM/DrrA fragment possessing dual GEF and GDF activity in complex with Rab1. SidM/DrrA reconfigures the Switch regions of the GTPase domain of Rab1, as eukaryotic GEFs do toward cognate Rabs. Structure‐based mutational analyses show that the surface of SidM/DrrA, catalysing nucleotide exchange, is involved in GDI1 displacement from prenylated Rab1:GDP. In comparison with an eukaryotic GEF TRAPP I, this bacterial GEF/GDF exhibits high binding affinity for Rab1 with GDP retained at the active site, which appears as the key feature for the GDF activity of the protein.     

Mammalian Ric-8A (synembryn) is a heterotrimeric Galpha protein guanine nucleotide exchange factor

The activation of heterotrimeric G proteins is accomplished primarily by the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of ligand-bound G protein-coupled receptors. The existence of nonreceptor guanine nucleotide exchange factors for G proteins has also been postulated. Yeast two-hybrid screens with Galpha(o) and Galpha(s) as baits were performed to identify binding partners of these proteins. Two mammalian homologs of the Caenorhabditis elegans protein Ric-8 were identified in these screens: Ric-8A (Ric-8/synembryn) and Ric-8B. Purification and biochemical characterization of recombinant Ric-8A revealed that it is a potent guanine nucleotide exchange factor for a subset of Galpha proteins including Galpha(q), Galpha(i1), and Galpha(o), but not Galpha(s). The mechanism of Ric-8A-mediated guanine nucleotide exchange was elucidated. Ric-8A interacts with GDP-bound Galpha proteins, stimulates release of GDP, and forms a stable nucleotide-free transition state complex with the Galpha protein; this complex dissociates upon binding of GTP to Galpha.     

Signaling mechanisms and physiological functions of G‐protein Gα13 in blood vessel formation,bone homeostasis,and cancer

Heterotrimeric G‐proteins are cellular signal transducers. They mainly relay signals from G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPCRs function as guanine nucleotide‐exchange factors to active these G‐proteins. Based on the sequence and functional similarities, these G‐proteins are grouped into four subfamilies: G_s, G_i, G_q, and G_12/13. The G_12/13 subfamily consists of two members: G₁₂ and G₁₃. G_12/13‐mediated signaling pathways play pivotal roles in a variety of physiological processes, while aberrant regulation of this pathway has been identified in various human diseases. Here we summarize the signaling mechanisms and physiological functions of Gα₁₃ in blood vessel formation and bone homeostasis. We further discuss the expanding roles of Gα₁₃ in cancers, serving as oncogenes as well as tumor suppressors.     

LRRK2 kinase activity is dependent on LRRK2 GTP binding capacity but independent of LRRK2 GTP binding

Leucine rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) is a Parkinson's disease (PD) gene that encodes a large multidomain protein including both a GTPase and a kinase domain. GTPases often regulate kinases within signal transduction cascades, where GTPases act as molecular switches cycling between a GTP bound "on" state and a GDP bound "off" state. It has been proposed that LRRK2 kinase activity may be increased upon GTP binding at the LRRK2 Ras of complex proteins (ROC) GTPase domain. Here we extensively test this hypothesis by measuring LRRK2 phosphorylation activity under influence of GDP, GTP or non-hydrolyzable GTP analogues GTPγS or GMPPCP. We show that autophosphorylation and lrrktide phosphorylation activity of recombinant LRRK2 protein is unaltered by guanine nucleotides, when co-incubated with LRRK2 during phosphorylation reactions. Also phosphorylation activity of LRRK2 is unchanged when the LRRK2 guanine nucleotide binding pocket is previously saturated with various nucleotides, in contrast to the greatly reduced activity measured for the guanine nucleotide binding site mutant T1348N. Interestingly, when nucleotides were incubated with cell lysates prior to purification of LRRK2, kinase activity was slightly enhanced by GTPγS or GMPPCP compared to GDP, pointing to an upstream guanine nucleotide binding protein that may activate LRRK2 in a GTP-dependent manner. Using metabolic labeling, we also found that cellular phosphorylation of LRRK2 was not significantly modulated by nucleotides, although labeling is significantly reduced by guanine nucleotide binding site mutants. We conclude that while kinase activity of LRRK2 requires an intact ROC-GTPase domain, it is independent of GDP or GTP binding to ROC.     

A COPI coat subunit interacts directly with an early‐Golgi localized Arf exchange factor

Arf (ADP‐ribosylation factor) family small G proteins are crucial regulators of intracellular transport. The active GTP‐bound form of Arf interacts with a set of proteins—effectors—which mediate the downstream signalling events of Arf activation. A well‐studied class of Arf1 effectors comprises the coat complexes, such as the cis‐Golgi‐localized COPI (coat protein complex I) coat, and trans‐Golgi network‐endosomal clathrin coats. At least five different coats require Arf1‐GTP to localize to organelle membranes. How a single Arf protein recruits different coat complexes to distinct membrane sites raises the question of how specificity is achieved. Here, we propose a molecular mechanism of this specificity for the COPI coat by showing a direct and specific interaction between a COPI subunit and a cis‐Golgi localized subfamily of Arf guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that takes place independently of Arf1 activation. In this way, a specific output on Arf1 activation can be programmed before the exchange reaction by the GEF itself.     

Nucleotide binding switches the information flow in ras GTPases

The Ras superfamily comprises many guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) that are essential to intracellular signal transduction. The guanine nucleotide-dependent intrinsic flexibility patterns of five G proteins were investigated in atomic detail through Molecular Dynamics simulations of the GDP- and GTP-bound states (S(GDP) and S(GTP), respectively). For all the considered systems, the intrinsic flexibility of S(GDP) was higher than that of S(GTP), suggesting that Guanine Exchange Factor (GEF) recognition and nucleotide switch require higher amplitude motions than effector recognition or GTP hydrolysis. Functional mode, dynamic domain, and interaction energy correlation analyses highlighted significant differences in the dynamics of small G proteins and Gα proteins, especially in the inactive state. Indeed, S(GDP) of Gα(t), is characterized by a more extensive energy coupling between nucleotide binding site and distal regions involved in GEF recognition compared to small G proteins, which attenuates in the active state. Moreover, mechanically distinct domains implicated in nucleotide switch could be detected in the presence of GDP but not in the presence of GTP. Finally, in small G proteins, functional modes are more detectable in the inactive state than in the active one and involve changes in solvent exposure of two highly conserved amino acids in switches I and II involved in GEF recognition. The average solvent exposure of these amino acids correlates in turn with the rate of GDP release, suggesting for them either direct or indirect roles in the process of nucleotide switch. Collectively, nucleotide binding changes the information flow through the conserved Ras-like domain, where GDP enhances the flexibility of mechanically distinct portions involved in nucleotide switch, and favors long distance allosteric communication (in Gα proteins), compared to GTP.     

Structural mimicry of DH domains by Arfaptin suggests a model for the recognition of Rac-GDP by its guanine nucleotide exchange factors.

Small G proteins cycle between an inactive form bound to GDP, and an active form bound to GTP. The two forms have different conformations and interact specifically with different partners, hence, the ability of G proteins to function as molecular switches. This view has been challenged by recent structural and biochemical studies of the Arfaptin/Por protein, which interacts equally well with the GDP- and GTP-bound forms of the G protein Rac. Here it is shown that the dimeric helical domain of Arfaptin superimposes with a monomeric helical domain from the Dbl homology domain of Tiam, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rac, in their respective complexes with Rac. This unexpected structural mimicry suggests that the Rac-GDP-Arfaptin complex resembles the low-affinity Rac-GDP-GEF complex that initiates the exchange reaction. This provides a model for the exchange mechanism where DH domains first dock onto Rac-GDP at the switch 2 before they undergo domain closure to catalyze GDP dissociation.     

PsHint1, associated with the G‐protein α subunit PsGPA1, is required for the chemotaxis and pathogenicity of Phytophthora sojae

Zoospore chemotaxis to soybean isoflavones is essential in the early stages of infection by the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora sojae. Previously, we have identified a G‐protein α subunit encoded by PsGPA1 which regulates the chemotaxis and pathogenicity of P. sojae. In the present study, we used affinity purification to identify PsGPA1‐interacting proteins, including PsHint1, a histidine triad (HIT) domain‐containing protein orthologous to human HIT nucleotide‐binding protein 1 (HINT1). PsHint1 interacted with both the guanosine triphosphate (GTP)‐ and guanosine diphosphate (GDP)‐bound forms of PsGPA1. An analysis of the gene‐silenced transformants revealed that PsHint1 was involved in the chemotropic response of zoospores to the isoflavone daidzein. During interaction with a susceptible soybean cultivar, PsHint1‐silenced transformants displayed significantly reduced infectious hyphal extension and caused a strong cell death in plants. In addition, the transformants displayed defective cyst germination, forming abnormal germ tubes that were highly branched and exhibited apical swelling. These results suggest that PsHint1 not only regulates chemotaxis by interacting with PsGPA1, but also participates in a Gα‐independent pathway involved in the pathogenicity of P. sojae.     

Light-regulated biochemical events in invertebrate photoreceptors. 1. Light-activated guanosinetriphosphatase, guanine nucleotide binding, and cholera toxin catalyzed labeling of squid photoreceptor membranes

The occurrence of a guanine nucleotide binding protein activated by squid rhodopsin was established by examination of GTPase activity, guanine nucleotide binding, and cholera toxin catalyzed labeling of squid photoreceptor membranes. Purified squid (Loligo opalescens) photoreceptors exhibited GTPase activity that increased 3-4-fold by illumination. Half-maximal GTPase activity was observed when 2% of the rhodopsin was photoconverted to metarhodopsin. The Km of the light-regulated activity was 1 microM GTP. Binding of the hydrolysis-resistant GTP analogue guanosine 5'-(beta, gamma-imidotriphosphate) [Gpp(NH)p] was enhanced greater than 10 times by illumination. A protein, Mr 44 000, was identified as a component of the light-activated guanine nucleotide binding protein/GTPase through its specific labeling with [32P]NAD catalyzed by cholera toxin: light increased the extent of 32P incorporation 7-fold. The addition of ATP to the membrane suspension enhanced labeling, while guanine nucleotides inhibited labeling with the relative potency GTP gamma S much greater than GDP greater than GTP greater than Gpp(NH)p. The 44 000-dalton protein was membrane bound irrespective of variations in ionic strength and divalent ion concentration over a wide range. These results suggest that a G protein, which incorporates both GTP binding and hydrolysis functions, is intimately involved in the visual process of invertebrate photoreceptors.     

The solution structure and dynamics of the DH‐PH module of PDZRhoGEF in isolation and in complex with nucleotide‐free RhoA

The DH‐PH domain tandems of Dbl‐homology guanine nucleotide exchange factors catalyze the exchange of GTP for GDP in Rho‐family GTPases, and thus initiate a wide variety of cellular signaling cascades. Although several crystal structures of complexes of DH‐PH tandems with cognate, nucleotide free Rho GTPases are known, they provide limited information about the dynamics of the complex and it is not clear how accurately they represent the structures in solution. We used a complementary combination of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS), and hydrogen‐deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (DXMS) to study the solution structure and dynamics of the DH‐PH tandem of RhoA‐specific exchange factor PDZRhoGEF, both in isolation and in complex with nucleotide free RhoA. We show that in solution the DH‐PH tandem behaves as a rigid entity and that the mutual disposition of the DH and PH domains remains identical within experimental error to that seen in the crystal structure of the complex, thus validating the latter as an accurate model of the complex in vivo. We also show that the nucleotide‐free RhoA exhibits elevated dynamics when in complex with DH‐PH, a phenomenon not observed in the crystal structure, presumably due to the restraining effects of crystal contacts. The complex is readily and rapidly dissociated in the presence of both GDP and GTP nucleotides, with no evidence of intermediate ternary complexes.     

Human RhoA/RhoGDI complex expressed in yeast: GTP exchange is sufficient for translocation of RhoA to liposomes

The human small GTPase, RhoA, expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is post-translationally processed and, when co-expressed with its cytosolic inhibitory protein, RhoGDI, spontaneously forms a heterodimer in vivo. The RhoA/RhoGDI complex, purified to greater than 98% at high yield from the yeast cytosolic fraction, could be stoichiometrically ADP-ribosylated by Clostridium botulinum C3 exoenzyme, contained stoichiometric GDP, and could be nucleotide exchanged fully with [3H]GDP or partially with GTP in the presence of submicromolar Mg2+. The GTP-RhoA/RhoGDI complex hydrolyzed GTP with a rate constant of 4.5 X 10(-5) s(-1), considerably slower than free RhoA. Hydrolysis followed pseudo-first-order kinetics indicating that the RhoA hydrolyzing GTP was RhoGDI associated. The constitutively active G14V-RhoA mutant expressed as a complex with RhoGDI and purified without added nucleotide also bound stoichiometric guanine nucleotide: 95% contained GDP and 5% GTP. Microinjection of the GTP-bound G14V-RhoA/RhoGDI complex (but not the GDP form) into serum-starved Swiss 3T3 cells elicited formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. In vitro, GTP-bound-RhoA spontaneously translocated from its complex with RhoGDI to liposomes, whereas GDP-RhoA did not. These results show that GTP-triggered translocation of RhoA from RhoGDI to a membrane, where it carries out its signaling function, is an intrinsic property of the RhoA/RhoGDI complex that does not require other protein factors or membrane receptors.