Pharmacodynamic Effects of Canagliflozin,a Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitor,from a Randomized Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Introduction

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single and multiple ascending-dose study evaluated the pharmacodynamic effects and safety/tolerability of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Patients (N = 116) discontinued their antihyperglycemic medications 2 weeks before randomization. Patients received canagliflozin 30, 100, 200, or 400 mg once daily or 300 mg twice daily, or placebo at 2 study centers in the United States and Germany, or canagliflozin 30 mg once daily or placebo at 1 study center in Korea, while maintaining an isocaloric diet for 2 weeks. On Days –1, 1, and 16, urinary glucose excretion (UGE), plasma glucose (PG), fasting PG (FPG), and insulin were measured. The renal threshold for glucose (RT_G) was calculated from UGE, PG, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Safety was evaluated based on adverse event (AE) reports, vital signs, electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory tests, and physical examinations.

Results

Canagliflozin increased UGE dose-dependently (∼80–120 g/day with canagliflozin ≥100 mg), with increases maintained over the 14-day dosing period with each dose. Canagliflozin dose-dependently decreased RT_G, with maximal reductions to ∼4–5 mM (72–90 mg/dL). Canagliflozin also reduced FPG and 24-hour mean PG; glucose reductions were seen on Day 1 and maintained over 2 weeks. Plasma insulin reductions with canagliflozin were consistent with observed PG reductions. Canagliflozin also reduced body weight. AEs were transient, mild to moderate in intensity, and balanced across groups; 1 canagliflozin-treated female reported an episode of vaginal candidiasis. Canagliflozin did not cause hypoglycemia, consistent with the RT_G values remaining above the hypoglycemia threshold. At Day 16, there were no clinically meaningful changes in urine volume, urine electrolyte excretion, renal function, or routine laboratory test values.

Conclusions

Canagliflozin increased UGE and decreased RT_G, leading to reductions in PG, insulin, and body weight, and was generally well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00963768","term_id":"NCT00963768"}}NCT00963768     

2 型糖尿病伴脂肪肝患者血浆FGF21水平与肥胖、脂代谢及胰岛素抵抗的相关性

目的:研究2型糖尿病伴脂肪肝患者血浆成纤维细胞生长因子21(FGF21)水平与肥胖、脂代谢及胰岛素抵抗的相关性,为临床诊疗提供依据。方法:选取2013年5月到2015年11月我院收治的2型糖尿病伴脂肪肝患者100例为研究组,另选取同期单纯脂肪肝患者100例为脂肪肝组,健康体检者100例为对照组,比较各组入选次日清晨FGF21、谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、游离脂肪酸(FFA)、体重指数(BMI)、腰臀比(WHR)、空腹胰岛素(FINS)、空腹血糖(FBG)以及胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)。结果:研究组TG、TC、AST、ALT、LDL-C、FFA、FBG、BMI、WHR、FINS、HOMA-IR以及FGF21均显著高于对照组,HDL-C显著低于对照组,比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组FFA、TG、FINS、FBG、HOMA-IR以及FGF21显著高于脂肪肝组,BMI和WHR显著低于脂肪肝组,比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);相关性分析显示:FGF21与TG、FFA、BMI以及HOMA-IR呈正相关关系(P0.05)。结论:2型糖尿病合并脂肪肝患者FGF21水平会显著升高,且与脂肪代谢、肥胖以及胰岛素抵抗有关。     

Gut Hormone Pharmacology of a Novel GPR119 Agonist (GSK1292263), Metformin,and Sitagliptin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Randomized Studies

GPR119 receptor agonists improve glucose metabolism and alter gut hormone profiles in animal models and healthy subjects. We therefore investigated the pharmacology of GSK1292263 (GSK263), a selective GPR119 agonist, in two randomized, placebo-controlled studies that enrolled subjects with type 2 diabetes. Study 1 had drug-naive subjects or subjects who had stopped their diabetic medications, and Study 2 had subjects taking metformin. GSK263 was administered as single (25–800 mg; n = 45) or multiple doses (100–600 mg/day for 14 days; n = 96). Placebo and sitagliptin 100 mg/day were administered as comparators. In Study 1, sitagliptin was co-administered with GSK263 or placebo on Day 14 of dosing. Oral glucose and meal challenges were used to assess the effects on plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP). After 13 days of dosing, GSK263 significantly increased plasma total PYY levels by ∼five-fold compared with placebo, reaching peak concentrations of ∼50 pM after each of the three standardized meals with the 300 mg BID dose. Co-dosing of GSK263 and metformin augmented peak concentrations to ∼100 pM at lunchtime. GSK263 had no effect on active or total GLP-1 or GIP, but co-dosing with metformin increased post-prandial total GLP-1, with little effect on active GLP-1. Sitagliptin increased active GLP-1, but caused a profound suppression of total PYY, GLP-1, and GIP when dosed alone or with GSK263. This suppression of peptides was reduced when sitagliptin was co-dosed with metformin. GSK263 had no significant effect on circulating glucose, insulin, C-peptide or glucagon levels. We conclude that GSK263 did not improve glucose control in type 2 diabetics, but it had profound effects on circulating PYY. The gut hormone effects of this GPR119 agonist were modulated when co-dosed with metformin and sitagliptin. Metformin may modulate negative feedback loops controlling the secretion of enteroendocrine peptides.

Trial Registration:

Clinicaltrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01119846","term_id":"NCT01119846"}}NCT01119846 Clinicaltrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01128621","term_id":"NCT01128621"}}NCT01128621     

Effectiveness of a Supportive Telephone Counseling Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Randomized Controlled Study

Objectives

This randomized controlled trial investigated whether a patient-centered supportive counseling intervention comprising monthly telephone-based counseling sessions by practice nurses over 12 months improved diabetes-related medical and psycho-social outcomes above usual care in type 2 diabetes patients with poor glycemic control at baseline (HbA_1c >7.5%) in a primary care setting.

Research Design

Patients were individually randomized into intervention (n = 103) and usual care group (n = 101). The primary outcome was change in HbA_1c-concentration after 12 and 18 months. Secondary outcomes were lipid levels, blood pressure, health-related quality of life and symptoms of depression. Follow-up-measurements were carried out after 6, 12 and 18 months to assess potential immediate and maintained effects of the intervention. For the multivariate analysis, hierarchical linear models were computed for each outcome to assess within-group changes in outcomes over time and between-group differences in patterns of change.

Results

HbA_1c (in %) decreased significantly from baseline to 12-month follow-up measurement both in the intervention (−0.44) and the usual care group (−0.51), but there was no significant between-group intervention effect. Significant improvements in the intervention group along with significant between-group differences were seen for health-related quality of life and, transiently, for systolic blood pressure and depression.

Conclusions

Although we found no beneficial effect of the supportive telephone counseling in terms of a reduction of HbA_1c above usual care, our findings suggest some beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors, quality of life and depression. Continuous efforts might be needed to sustain improvements in patient outcomes.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00742547","term_id":"NCT00742547"}}NCT00742547     

Pitavastatin and Atorvastatin Double-Blind Randomized ComPArative Study among HiGh-Risk Patients,Including ThOse with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,in Taiwan (PAPAGO-T Study)

Background

Evidence about the efficacy and safety of statin treatment in high-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia is available for some populations, but not for ethnic Chinese. To test the hypothesis that treatment with pitavastatin (2 mg/day) is not inferior to treatment with atorvastatin (10 mg/day) for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), a 12-week multicenter collaborative randomized parallel-group comparative study of high-risk ethnic Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia was conducted in Taiwan. In addition, the effects on other lipid parameters, inflammatory markers, insulin-resistance-associated biomarkers and safety were evaluated.

Methods and Results

Between July 2011 and April 2012, 251 patients were screened, 225 (mean age: 58.7 ± 8.6; women 38.2% [86/225]) were randomized and treated with pitavastatin (n = 112) or atorvastatin (n = 113) for 12 weeks. Baseline characteristics in both groups were similar, but after 12 weeks of treatment, LDL-C levels were significantly lower: pitavastatin group = −35.0 ± 14.1% and atorvastatin group = −38.4 ± 12.8% (both: p < 0.001). For the subgroup with diabetes mellitus (DM) (n = 125), LDL-C levels (−37.1 ± 12.9% vs. −38.0 ± 13.1%, p = 0.62) were similarly lowered after either pitavastatin (n = 63) or atorvastatin (n = 62) treatment. Triglycerides, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apoprotein B were similarly and significantly lower in both treatment groups. In non-lipid profiles, HOMA-IR and insulin levels were higher to a similar degree in both statin groups. Hemoglobin A₁C was significantly (p = 0.001) higher in the atorvastatin group but not in the pitavastatin group. Both statins were well tolerated, and both groups had a similar low incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.

Conclusion

Both pitavastatin (2 mg/day) and atorvastatin (10 mg/day) were well tolerated, lowered LDL-C, and improved the lipid profile to a comparable degree in high-risk Taiwanese patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01386853","term_id":"NCT01386853"}}NCT01386853 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/{"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01386853","term_id":"NCT01386853"}}NCT01386853?term={"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01386853","term_id":"NCT01386853"}}NCT01386853&rank=1     

A Catechin‐rich Beverage Improves Obesity and Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

We investigated the effects of continuous ingestion of a catechin‐rich beverage in patients with type 2 diabetes who were not receiving insulin (Ins) therapy in a double‐blind controlled study. The participants ingested green tea containing either 582.8 mg of catechins (catechin group; n = 23) or 96.3 mg of catechins (control group; n = 20) per day for 12 weeks. At week 12, the decrease in waist circumference was significantly greater in the catechin group than in the control group. Adiponectin, which is negatively correlated with visceral adiposity, increased significantly only in the catechin group. Although the increase in Ins at week 12 was significantly greater in the catechin group than in the control group, no apparent difference was noted between the two groups in glucose and hemoglobin A_1c. In patients treated with insulinotropic agents, the increase in Ins at week 12 was significantly greater in the catechin group than in the control group. This significant increase in Ins levels was observed only in the catechin group. In the catechin group receiving other treatments, Ins levels remained unchanged. In addition, in patients treated with insulinotropic agents, the decrease in hemoglobin A_1c at week 12 was significantly greater in the catechin group than in the control group. These results suggest that a catechin‐rich beverage might have several therapeutic uses: in the prevention of obesity; in the recovery of Ins‐secretory ability; and, as a way to maintain low hemoglobin A_1c levels in type 2 diabetic patients who do not yet require Ins therapy.     

High‐Sensitivity C‐Reactive Protein in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Objective: To assess the relationship between high‐sensitivity (HS) C‐reactive protein (CRP) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) or atherosclerosis and to assess effects of strict metabolic control on the degree of inflammation and MetS in patients with type 2 diabetes. Research Methods and Procedures: Four hundred thirteen patients with diabetes were enrolled in the cross‐sectional study. Of these 413 patients, 161 patients were further admitted for 2.4 ± 0.4 weeks (mean ± SD) to investigate the change in HS‐CRP or other parameters under strict metabolic control. Results: Log‐transformed HS‐CRP value (log HS‐CRP) was strongly correlated with BMI (r = 0.448, p < 0.01). Log HS‐CRP was also correlated with the presence of MetS or each component of MetS. Furthermore, a positive significant trend in HS‐CRP levels was shown with an increasing number of MetS components (p < 0.05). Log HS‐CRP showed a significant positive correlation with carotid artery intima‐media thickness (IMT) (r = 0.152, p < 0.01). In multiple step‐wise regression analysis, BMI, hemoglobin A_1c, right IMT, duration of diabetes, and triglyceride were selected as explanatory variables for log HS‐CRP (R² = 0.412). Under strict metabolic control, HS‐CRP was significantly (p < 0.01) lower, together with lower levels of other markers for MetS. The change in HS‐CRP was significantly correlated with the change in BMI (r = 0.161, p = 0.04). Discussion: In subjects with type 2 diabetes, HS‐CRP levels are related to MetS and subclinical atherosclerosis. Strict weight management and metabolic control were associated with a reduction in HS‐CRP levels, and changes in HS‐CRP were related to changes in weight, supporting the hypothesis that lifestyle modification reduces inflammation and the risk of CHD.     

Differences in the Acute Effects of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the RAED2 Randomized Trial

Objective

Both aerobic (AER) and resistance (RES) training, if maintained over a period of several months, reduce HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes subjects. However, it is still unknown whether the short-term effects of these types of exercise on blood glucose are similar. Our objective was to assess whether there may be a difference in acute blood glucose changes after a single bout of AER or RES exercise.

Study Design

Twenty-five patients participating in the RAED2 Study, a RCT comparing AER and RES training in diabetic subjects, were submitted to continuous glucose monitoring during a 60-min exercise session and over the following 47 h. These measurements were performed after 10.9+0.4 weeks of training. Glucose concentration areas under the curve (AUC) during exercise, the subsequent night, and the 24-h period following exercise, as well as the corresponding periods of the non-exercise day, were assessed. Moreover, the low (LBGI) and high (HBGI) blood glucose indices, which summarize the duration and extent of hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia, respectively, were measured.

Results

AER and RES training similarly reduced HbA1c. Forty-eight hour glucose AUC was similar in both groups. However, a comparison of glucose AUC during the 60-min exercise period and the corresponding period of the non-exercise day showed that glucose levels were lower during exercise in the AER but not in the RES group (time-by-group interaction p = 0.04). Similar differences were observed in the nocturnal periods (time-by-group interaction p = 0.02). Accordingly, nocturnal LBGI was higher in the exercise day than in the non-exercise day in the AER (p = 0.012) but not in the RES group (p = 0.62).

Conclusions

Although AER and RES training have similar long-term metabolic effects in diabetic subjects, the acute effects of single bouts of these exercise types differ, with a potential increase in late-onset hypoglycaemia risk after AER exercise.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01182948","term_id":"NCT01182948"}}NCT01182948     

Patient-Led Versus Physician-Led Titration of Insulin Glargine in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Multinational Atlas Study

ObjectiveSelf-adjustment of insulin dose is commonly practiced in Western patients with type 2 diabetes but is usually not performed in Asian patients. This multinational, 24-week, randomized study compared patient-led with physician-led titration of once-daily insulin glargine in Asian patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were on 2 oral glucose-lowering agents.MethodsPatient-led (n = 275) or physician-led (n = 277) subjects followed the same dose-titration algorithm guided by self-monitored fasting blood glucose (FBG; target, 110 mg/dL [6.1 mmol/L]). The primary endpoint was change in mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) at week 24 in the patient-led versus physician-led titration groups.ResultsPatient-led titration resulted in a significantly higher drop in HbA_1c value at 24 weeks when compared with physician-led titration (− 1.40% vs. − 1.25%; mean difference, − 0.15; 95% confidence interval, − 0.29 to 0.00; P = .043). Mean decrease in FBG was greatest in the patient-led group (− 2.85 mmol/L vs. − 2.48 mmol/L; P = .001). The improvements in HbA_1c and FBG were consistent across countries, with similar improvements in treatment satisfaction in both groups. Mean daily insulin dose was higher in the patient-led group (28.9 units vs. 22.2 units; P < .001). Target HbA_1c of < 7.0% without severe hypoglycemia was achieved in 40.0% and 32.9% in the patient-led and physician-led groups, respectively (P = .086). Severe hypoglycemia was not different in the 2 groups (0.7%), with an increase in nocturnal and symptomatic hypoglycemia in the patient-led arm.ConclusionPatient-led insulin glargine titration achieved near-target blood glucose levels in Asian patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were on 2 oral glucose-lowering drugs, demonstrating that Asian patients can self-uptitrate insulin dose effectively when guided. (Endocr Pract. 2015;21:143-157)     

Efficacy and Safety of Linagliptin in Black/African American Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A 6-Month,Randomized, Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Study

ObjectiveAlthough black/African American individuals are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes, there is scant clinical trial information available on antidiabetes therapies in this group. We compared linagliptin with placebo in black/African American adults who were treatment-naïve or receiving one oral antidiabetes drug.MethodsOf 226 patients randomized to 24 weeks’ linagliptin 5 mg/day or placebo, 208 had baseline and at least one on-treatment glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) measurement. Mean baseline HbA_1c was 8.6% in the linagliptin group (n = 98) and 8.68% in the placebo group (n = 110). The primary outcome was change in HbA_1c from baseline to week 24.ResultsBy week 24, mean HbA_1c changes were − 0.84% with linagliptin and − 0.25% with placebo (treatment difference, − 0.58%; P < .001), and more patients in the linagliptin group achieved HbA_1c < 7.0% (26.8% vs. 8.3%; P = .001) or an HbA_1c reduction ≥ 0.5% (54.1% vs. 30.0%; P < .001). Mean weight loss was − 1.1 kg in both groups. During the treatment period, 8 of 98 linagliptingroup patients and 17 of 110 placebo-group patients required rescue therapy (odds ratio, 0.5; P = .14). For postprandial glucose, values were available for few patients (11 placebo, 10 linagliptin), and thus the between-group difference was associated with wide confidence intervals (CIs) (difference, − 1.97 mg/dL; 95% CI, − 53.80 to 49.86; P = .94). In the overall study population, a similar proportion of patients in both groups had adverse events (58.5% vs. 61.7%); most events were mild or moderate and considered unrelated to study drug. Investigator-defined hypoglycemia was rare (3 linagliptin-group patients and 1 placebogroup patient), with no severe events (requiring external assistance).ConclusionThis study confirms that linagliptin is efficacious and well tolerated in black/African American patients with type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20: 412-420)     

Plasma HMGB-1 Levels in Subjects with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in China

Object

To detect the levels of plasma High-Mobility Group Box-1(HMGB1) in Chinese subject with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to investigate the correlations between plasma HMGB1 concentration and parameters of body fat, insulin resistance (IR) metabolism and inflammation.

Methods

This study recruited 79 normal glucose tolerance (NGT) subjects and 76 newly diagnosed T2DM patients. NGT and T2DM groups were divided into normal weight (NW) and obese (OB)subgroups respectively. Anthropometric parameters such as height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference and blood pressure were measured. Plasma concentrations of HMGB1, IL-6, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2 hours post challenge plasma glucose (2hPG), serum lipid, glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1C) and fasting insulin (FINS) were examined. The homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) was performed to assess IR status.

Results

Plasma HMGB1 levels were higher in T2DM group than that in NGT group. The concentrations of serum HMGB1 were also higher in subjects with OB than those in subjects with NW both in NGT and T2DM groups. Plasma levels of HMGB1 were positively correlated with waist hip ratio (WHR), blood pressure, FPG, FINS, HOMA-IR, TG, IL-6 and negatively correlated with HOMA-βand high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-c) independent of age, gender and BMI. Plasma levels of HMGB1 were significantly correlated with diabetes in fully adjusted models.

Conclusion

Plasma HMGB1 levels were increased in Chinese subjects with pure T2DM, which might be caused by IR. Serum HMGB1 participated in the pathological process of obesity and T2DM via its proinflammatory effect.