Analysis of Ribosomes from Viomycin-Sensitive and -Resistant Strains of Mycobacterium smegmatis

Viomycin-resistant strains were isolated from Mycobacterium smegmatis. Ribosomes were isolated and tested for drug resistance in subcellular systems containing poly(U) as messenger ribonucleic acid. Resistance to viomycin in these strains was due to altered ribosomes. Further analysis showed that viomycin resistance of two mutants with low level resistance (20 mug/ml) was due to altered 30S ribosomal subunits. Another mutant that was highly resistant to viomycin (1 mg/ml), however, had altered 50S ribosomal subunits.     

Binding of [14C]tuberactinomycin O, an antibiotic closely related to viomycin, to the bacterial ribosome.

The binding of [¹⁴C]tuberactinomycin O, an antibiotic closely related to viomycin, to $\text{E. coli}$ ribosomes has been examined by equilibrium dialysis method. The antibiotic has been observed to bind to the 70S ribosome, which possesses two binding sites: one on the 30S ribosomal subunit and another on the 50S subunit. The affinity for the large subunit is greater than that for the small subunit. The binding to both ribosomal subunits is reversed by viomycin, indicating that tuberactinomycin O and viomycin have the same binding sites on the ribosome. The results seem to be in accordance with the previous finding that viomycin exhibits dual actions on ribosomal function: the inhibition of fMet-tRNA_F (initiation) and inhibition of translocation of peptidyl-tRNA.     

Binding of CC-1065 to poly- and oligonucleotides

The binding of the antitumor agent CC-1065 to a variety of poly- and oligonucleotides was studied by electronic absorption, CD, and resistance to removal by Sephadex column chromatography. Competitive binding experiments between CC-1065 and netropsin were carried out with calf-thymus DNA, poly(dI-dC) · poly(dI-dC), poly(dI) · poly(dC), poly(rA) · poly(dT), poly(dA- dC) · poly(dG-dT), and poly(dA) · 2poly(dT). CC-1065 binds to polynucleotides by three mechanisms. In the first, CC-1065 binds only weakly, as judged by the induction of zero or very weak CD spectra and low resistance to extraction of drug from the polynucleotide by Sephadex chromatography. In the second and third mechanisms, CC-1065 binds strongly, as judged by the induction of two distinct, intense CD spectra and high resistance to extraction of drug from the polynucleotide, by Sephadex chromatography in both cases. The species bound by the second mechanism converts to that bound by the third mechanism with varying kinetics, which depend both on the base-pair sequence and composition of the polynucleotide. Competitive binding experiments with netropsin show that CC-1065 binds strongly in the minor groove of DNA by the second and third mechanisms of binding. Netropsin can displace CC-1065 that is bound by the second mechanism but not that bound by the third mechanism. CC-1065 binds preferentially to B-form duplex DNA and weakly (by the first binding mechanism) or not at all to RNA, DNA, and RNA–DNA polynucleotides which adopt the A-form conformation or to single-strand DNA. This correlation of strong binding of CC-1065 to B-form duplex DNA is consistent with x-ray data, which suggest an anomalous structure for poly(dI) · poly(rC), as compared with poly(rI) · poly(dC) (A-form) and poly(dI) · poly(dC) (B-form). The binding data indicate that poly(rA) · poly(dU) takes the B-form secondary structure like poly(rA) · poly(dT). Triple-stranded poly(dA) · 2poly(dT) and poly(dA) · 2poly(dU), which are considered to adopt the A-form conformation, bind CC-1065 strongly. Netropsin, which also shows a binding preference for B-form polynucleotides, also binds to poly(dA) · 2poly(dT) and occupies the same binding site as CC-1065. These binding studies are consistent with results of x-ray studies, which suggest that A-form triplex DNA retains some structural features of B-form DNA that are not present in A-form duplex DNA; i.e., the axial rise per nucleotide and the base tilt. Triple-stranded poly(dA) · 2poly(rU) does not bind CC-1065 strongly but has nearly the same conformation as poly(dA) · 2poly(dT) based on x-ray analysis. This suggests that the 2′-OH group of the poly(rU) strands interferes with CC-1065 binding to this polynucleotide. The same type of interference may occur for other RNA and DNA–RNA polynucleotides that bind CC-1065 weakly.     

A major determinant of hnRNP C protein binding to RNA is a novel bZIP-like RNA binding domain.

The C protein tetramer of hnRNP complexes binds approximately 150-230 nt of RNA with high cooperativity (McAfee J et al., 1996, Biochemistry 35:1212-1222). Three contiguously bound tetramers fold 700-nt lengths of RNA into a 19S triangular intermediate that nucleates 40S hnRNP assembly in vitro (Huang M et al., 1994, Mol Cell Biol 14:518-533). Although it has been assumed that the consensus RNA recognition motif (RRM) of C protein (residues 8-87) is the primary determinant of RNA binding, we report here that a recombinant construct containing residues 1-115 has very low affinity for RNA at physiological ionic strength (100 mM NaCl). Moreover, we demonstrate that an N-terminal deletion construct lacking the consensus RRM but containing residues 140-290 binds RNA with an affinity sufficient to account for the total free energy change observed for the binding of intact protein. Like native C protein, the 140-290 construct is a tetramer in solution and binds RNA stoichiometrically in a salt-resistant manner in 100-300 mM NaCl. Residues 140-179 of the N-terminal truncated variant contain 11 basic and 2 acidic residues, whereas residues 180-207 specify a leucine zipper motif that directs dimer assembly. Elements within the 50-residue carboxy terminus of C protein are required for tetramer assembly. A basic region followed by a leucine zipper is identical to the domain organization of the basic-leucine zipper (bZIP) class of DNA binding proteins. Sequence homologies with other proteins containing RRMs and the bZIP motif suggest that residues 140-207 represent a conserved bZIP-like RNA binding motif (designated bZLM). The steric orientation of four high-affinity RNA binding sites about rigid leucine zipper domains may explain in part C protein''s asymmetry, its large occluded site size, and its RNA folding activity.     

Binding properties of avian myeloblastosis virus DNA polymerases to nucleic acid affinity columns.

A new method for the analysis and purification of the RNA-directed DNA polymerase of RNA tumor viruses has been developed. This nucleic acid affinity chromatography system utilizes an immobilized oligo (dT) moiety annealed with poly (A). The alpha and alphabeta DNA polymerases of avain myeloblastosis virus bound effectively to poly (A) oligo (dT)-cellulose. Alpha DNA polymerase did not bind effectively to poly (A) oligo (dT)-cellulose, poly (A)-cellulose, or to cellulose. Alphabeta bound to oligo (dT)-cellulose and cellulose at the same extent (approximately 30%), indicating that this enzyme did not bind specifically to the oligo (DT) moiety only. However, alphabeta bound to poly (A)-cellulose two to three times better than to cellulose itself, showing that alphabeta could bind to poly (A) without a primer. Alphabeta DNA polymerase also bound to poly (C)-cellulose, whereas alpha did not. These data show that the alpha DNA polymerase is defective in binding to nucleic acids if the beta subunit is not present. Data is presented which demonstrates that the alphabeta DNA polymerase bound tighter to poly (A). oligo (DT)-cellulose and to calf thymus DNA-cellulose than the alpha DNA polymerase, suggesting that the beta subunit or, at least part of it is responsible for this tighter binding. In addition, alphabeta DNA polymerase is able to reversibly transcribe avian myeloblastosis virus 70S RNA approximately fivefold faster than alpha DNA polymerase in the presence of Mg2+ and equally efficient in the presence of Mn2+. alpha DNA polymerase transcribed 9S globin m RNA slightly better than alphabeta with either metal ion.     

Synthesis and coding properties of poly(c 1 A), poly(c 3 A), poly(c 7 A) and poly(h 6 A)

The homopolynucleotides poly(c¹A), poly(c³A), poly(c⁷A) and poly(h⁶A)⁺⁺ were synthesized from their corresponding nucleoside diphosphates using polynucleotide phosphorylase. With the exception of poly(h⁶A), which displayed no hypochromicity, the homopolynucleotides showed melting profiles similar to poly(A). All these polynucleotides, poly(h⁶A), poly(c⁷A), poly(c³A) and poly(c¹A) stimulated the binding of Lys-tRNA to ribosomes; the coding activity of poly(c¹A), however, was very low. Poly(h⁶A) was found to be less specific for Lys-tRNA than poly(A). The data supports the exclusive formation of Watson-Crick type base pairs and contradicts Hoogsteen base pairing in codon-anticodon recognition. Since, however, poly(h⁶A), which can form only one hydrogen bridge per base pair, stimulated the binding of Lys-tRNA comparably to poly(A), the coding activity of the homopolynucleotides tested is discussed in respect to their secondary structure as well as to the pK-values of their 6-amino groups.     

Interaction between polyamines and nucleic acids or phospholipids

The binding of polyamines to DNA, RNA, and phospholipids has been studied by gel filtration and sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Spermine was found to bind more to a GC-rich DNA. Among RNAs containing double-stranded region [poly(AU), poly(GC), and ribosomal RNA], the binding of spermine was nearly equal. Among the single-stranded RNAs, the binding of spermine was in the order poly(U) > poly(C) > poly(A). An increase in K⁺ or Mg²⁺ concentration resulted in a great decrease in spermine binding to DNA and in a slight decrease in spermine binding to RNA. Therefore, in the presence of more than 2 mm Mg²⁺ and 100 mm K⁺, the binding of spermine to RNA was greater than that to DNA. No significant difference in spermine binding was observed between 16 S ribosomal RNA and 30 S ribosomal subunits, suggesting that ribosomal proteins did not affect significantly the binding of spermine to ribosomal RNA. The binding of spermine to microsomes was dependent on phospholipids. The binding strength was in the order phosphatidylinositol > phosphatidylethanolamine > phosphatidylcholine.     

Antibacterial nitroacridine, Nitroakridin 3582: binding to nucleic acids in vitro and effects on selected cell-free model systems of macromolecular biosynthesis

Nitroakridin 3582 (NA) formed complexes with native deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and with transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) species from Escherichia coli. Spectrophotometric titrations of NA with these nucleic acids produced numerical results from which nonlinear adsorption isotherms were derived. These curves indicated the existence of more than one class of binding sites on the polymers to which NA was bound by more than one process. The stoichiometry of strong binding of NA to double helical DNA was in agreement with a conventional value (1 ligand molecule per 4.2 component nucleotides) for complete intercalation binding. NA inhibited the DNA-dependent DNA polymerase I and RNA polymerase reactions, the first strongly and the second appreciably. These inhibitions corresponded to the extents to which NA inhibits DNA and RNA biosyntheses in vivo. Evidently, NA interferes with the template function of DNA. The drug also inhibited the polymerization of phenylalanine in a cell-free E. coli ribosome-polyuridylic acid [poly (U)] system. The effect paralleled an inhibition of the poly (U)-directed binding of phenylalanyl tRNA to ribosomes. Ethidium bromide acted similarly. The antimalarial drug, chloroquine, stimulated polyphenylalanine synthesis, apparently as a result of stimulating the poly (U)-directed binding of phenylalanyl tRNA to ribosomes.     

Identification of proteins functionally altered by chemical modification of the transfer RNA and polyuridylic acid binding sites of 30 S ribosomal subunits

Previous studies have shown that Rose Bengal-sensitized photo-oxidation of 30 S ribosomal subunits causes inactivation of tRNA binding and partial loss of poly(U) binding activities (Noller et al., 1971). The present studies, reconstitution of 30 S subunits from 16 S RNA, total protein from modified subunits, and purified proteins from untreated subunits, show that proteins S2 and S3 together completely restore these activities to the reconstituted subunits. The modified proteins are capable of in vitro assembly, and give rise to particles with normal sedimentation constants, showing that restoration of activity is not simply due to correction of an assembly defect.Protein S3 restores poly(U) binding and tRNA binding to the same extent, accounting for the lowered mRNA binding activity of the modified particles as well as a corresponding fraction of the tRNA binding activity. Protein S2 restores the remaining fraction of the tRNA binding activity, but has no effect on poly (U) binding. In 50 S-stimulated tRNA binding, proteins S1 and S5 are required in addition to S2 and S3 for full activity.     

Tetracycline inhibition of cell-free protein synthesis. I. Binding of tetracycline to components of the system

Day, L. E. (Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., Groton, Conn.). Tetracycline inhibition of cell-free protein synthesis. I. Binding of tetracycline to components of the system. J. Bacteriol. 91:1917-1923. 1966.-Tetracycline, an inhibitor of cell-free protein synthesis, effected the dissociation of Escherichia coli 100S ribosomes to 70S particles in vivo and in vitro, but was not observed to mediate the further degradation of these particles. The antibiotic was bound by both 50S (Svedberg) and 30S subunits of 70S ribosomes and also by E. coli soluble RNA (sRNA), polyuridylic acid (poly U), and polyadenylic acid (poly A). The binding to ribosomal subunits was higher at 5 x 10(-4)m Mg(++) than at 10(-2)m Mg(++). The binding to polynucleotide chains was highest when Mg(++) was not added to the reaction mixture.     

Crosslinking of Escherichia coli 50S ribosomal subunits with chlorambucilyl oligoprolyl phenylalanyl-tRNA molecular rulers.

A series of P-site probes, chlorambucilyl-(Pro)n-Phe-tRNAPhe, were prepared and reacted with poly(U)-directed Escherichia coli MRE 600 ribosomes. Upon binding of the probes to ribosomes, 90% of the cpm bound were not released following subsequent interaction with puromycin. In the absence of poly(U) or in the presence of poly(C), binding was limited to the amount of cpm bound if ribosomes were incubated in the presence of puromycin before adding modified tRNA and poly(U). AcPhe-tRNAPhe was a competitive inhibitor of chlorambucilyl Phe-tRNAPhe. Binding to 50S subunits was strongly stimulated by poly(U), while binding to 30S subunits was not. Crosslinked 50S proteins were analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Crosslinking with molecular rulers containing zero prolines led to poly(U)-dependent labeling of L1 and L27. With rulers containing five prolines, L6, L25, L28, and the group L18,23,24 were labeled. Analysis of crosslinked ribosomal RNA on sucrose density gradients revealed almost no cpm in the 16S or 23S peaks, but only in the 5S peaks. This was observed with molecular rulers containing either zero or five proline residues.     

Fluorescence studies of the binding of bacteriophage M13 gene V mutant proteins to polynucleotides.

This investigation describes how the binding characteristics of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein encoded by gene V of bacteriophage M13, are affected by single-site amino acid substitutions. The series of mutant proteins tested includes mutations in the purported monomer-monomer interaction region as well as mutations in the DNA-binding domain at positions which are thought to be functionally involved in monomer-monomer interaction or single-stranded DNA binding. The characteristics of the binding of the mutant proteins to the homopolynucleotides poly(dA), poly(dU) and poly(dT), were studied by means of fluorescence-titration experiments. The binding stoichiometry and fluorescence quenching of the mutant proteins are equal to, or lower than, the wild-type gene V protein values. In addition, all proteins measured bind a more-or-less co-operative manner to single-stranded DNA. The binding affinities for poly(dA) decrease in the following order: Y61H greater than wild-type greater than F68L and R16H greater than Y41F and Y41H greater than F73L greater than R21C greater than Y34H greater than G18D/Y56H. Possible explanations for the observed differences are discussed. The conservation of binding affinity, also for mutations in the single-stranded DNA-binding domain, suggests that the binding to homopolynucleotides is largely non-specific.