A Rep recognition sequence is necessary but not sufficient for nicking of DNA by adeno-associated virus type-2 Rep proteins

The strand-specific, site-specific endonuclease (nicking) activity of the Rep68 and Rep78 (Rep68/78) proteins of adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) is involved in AAV replication, and appears to be involved in AAV site-specific integration. Rep68/78 cuts within the inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) of the AAV genome and in the AAV preferred integration locus on human chromosome 19 (AAVS1). The known endonuclease cut sites are 11-16 bases away from the primary binding sites, known as Rep recognition sequences (RRSs). A linear, double-stranded segment of DNA, containing an RRS and a cut site, has previously been shown to function as a substrate for the Rep68/78 endonuclease activity. We show here that mutation of the Rep recognition sequence, within such a DNA segment derived from the AAV ITRs, eliminates the ability of this substrate to be cleaved detectably by Rep78. Rep78 nicks the RRS-containing site from AAVS1 about half as well as the linear ITR sequence. Eighteen other RRS-containing sequences found in the human genome, but outside AAVS1, are not cleaved by Rep78. These results may help to explain the specificity of AAV integration.     

Amino-terminal domain exchange redirects origin-specific interactions of adeno-associated virus rep78 in vitro

The unique ability of adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) to site-specifically integrate its genome into a defined sequence on human chromosome 19 (AAVS1) makes it of particular interest for use in targeted gene delivery. The objective underlying this study is to provide evidence for the feasibility of retargeting site-specific integration into selected loci within the human genome. Current models postulate that AAV DNA integration is initiated through the interactions of the products of a single viral open reading frame, REP, with sequences present in AAVS1 that resemble the minimal origin for AAV DNA replication. Here, we present a cell-free system designed to dissect the Rep functions required to target site-specific integration using functional chimeric Rep proteins derived from AAV Rep78 and Rep1 of the closely related goose parvovirus. We show that amino-terminal domain exchange efficiently redirects the specificity of Rep to the minimal origin of DNA replication. Furthermore, we establish that the amino-terminal 208 amino acids of Rep78/68 constitute a catalytic domain of Rep sufficient to mediate site-specific endonuclease activity.     

In vitro resolution of adeno-associated virus DNA hairpin termini by wild-type Rep protein is inhibited by a dominant-negative mutant of rep.

An adeno-associated virus (AAV) genome with a Lys-to-His (K340H) mutation in the consensus nucleotide triphosphate binding site of the rep gene has a dominant-negative DNA replication phenotype in vivo. We expressed both wild-type (Rep78) and mutant (Rep78NTP) proteins in two helper-free expression systems consisting of either recombinant baculoviruses in insect cells or the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat promoter in human 293 cell transient transfections. We analyzed nuclear extracts from both expression systems for the ability to complement uninfected HeLa cell cytoplasmic extracts in an in vitro terminal resolution assay in which a covalently closed AAV terminal hairpin structure is converted to an extended linear duplex. Although both Rep78 and Rep78NTP bound to AAV terminal hairpin DNA in vitro, Rep78 but not Rep78NTP complemented the terminal resolution assay. Furthermore, Rep78NTP was trans dominant for AAV terminal resolution in vitro. We propose that the dominant-negative replication phenotype of AAV genomes carrying the K340H mutation is mediated by mutant Rep proteins binding to the terminal repeat hairpin.     

The transient expression of mRNA coding for Rep protein from AAV facilitates targeted plasmid integration

BACKGROUND: There is a risk of insertional mutagenesis when techniques that facilitate random integration of exogenous DNA into the human genome are used for gene therapy. Wild-type adeno-associated virus (AAV) integrates preferentially into a specific site on human chromosome 19 (AAVS1). This is mediated by the interaction of the viral Rep68/78 proteins with Rep-binding elements in the AAV genome and AAVS1. This specificity is often lost when AAV is used as a gene therapy vector due to removal of the sequences coding for Rep. METHODS: Messenger RNA coding for the Rep68/78 proteins was prepared in vitro and co-transfected with a 21 kb DNA plasmid containing the P5 integration efficiency element (P5IEE) from AAV. Single cells were seeded in plates to establish clonal cell lines that were subsequently analysed by dual colour fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) to determine whether site-specific plasmid integration had occurred on chromosome 19. RESULTS: The co-transfection of plasmid DNA with Rep68/78 mRNA gave a 2.5-fold increase in DNA integration when compared to transfection of cells with plasmid DNA alone. Rep68/78 mRNA expression facilitated site-specific plasmid integration to chromosome 19 in 30% (14/44) of all analysed integration sites, while no targeted integration events were observed following transfection of cells with plasmid DNA alone. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that transient expression of Rep protein using transfected mRNA facilitates site-specific integration of plasmid DNA. This approach allows expression of Rep for only a short time, and may circumvent the toxicity and chromosome instability associated with long-term expression of Rep.     

DNA Structure Modulates the Oligomerization Properties of the AAV Initiator Protein Rep68

Rep68 is a multifunctional protein of the adeno-associated virus (AAV), a parvovirus that is mostly known for its promise as a gene therapy vector. In addition to its role as initiator in viral DNA replication, Rep68 is essential for site-specific integration of the AAV genome into human chromosome 19. Rep68 is a member of the superfamily 3 (SF3) helicases, along with the well-studied initiator proteins simian virus 40 large T antigen (SV40-LTag) and bovine papillomavirus (BPV) E1. Structurally, SF3 helicases share two domains, a DNA origin interaction domain (OID) and an AAA⁺ motor domain. The AAA⁺ motor domain is also a structural feature of cellular initiators and it functions as a platform for initiator oligomerization. Here, we studied Rep68 oligomerization in vitro in the presence of different DNA substrates using a variety of biophysical techniques and cryo-EM. We found that a dsDNA region of the AAV origin promotes the formation of a complex containing five Rep68 subunits. Interestingly, non-specific ssDNA promotes the formation of a double-ring Rep68, a known structure formed by the LTag and E1 initiator proteins. The Rep68 ring symmetry is 8-fold, thus differing from the hexameric rings formed by the other SF3 helicases. However, similiar to LTag and E1, Rep68 rings are oriented head-to-head, suggesting that DNA unwinding by the complex proceeds bidirectionally. This novel Rep68 quaternary structure requires both the DNA binding and AAA⁺ domains, indicating cooperativity between these regions during oligomerization in vitro. Our study clearly demonstrates that Rep68 can oligomerize through two distinct oligomerization pathways, which depend on both the DNA structure and cooperativity of Rep68 domains. These findings provide insight into the dynamics and oligomeric adaptability of Rep68 and serve as a step towards understanding the role of this multifunctional protein during AAV DNA replication and site-specific integration.     

Crystal structure of the SF3 helicase from adeno-associated virus type 2

We report here the crystal structure of an SF3 DNA helicase, Rep40, from adeno-associated virus 2 (AAV2). We show that AAV2 Rep40 is structurally more similar to the AAA(+) class of cellular proteins than to DNA helicases from other superfamilies. The structure delineates the expected Walker A and B motifs, but also reveals an unexpected "arginine finger" that directly implies the requirement of Rep40 oligomerization for ATP hydrolysis and helicase activity. Further, the Rep40 AAA(+) domain is novel in that it is unimodular as opposed to bimodular. Altogether, the structural connection to AAA(+) proteins defines the general architecture of SF3 DNA helicases, a family that includes simian virus 40 (SV40) T antigen, as well as provides a conceptual framework for understanding the role of Rep proteins during AAV DNA replication, packaging, and site-specific integration.     

Biologically active Rep proteins of adeno-associated virus type 2 produced as fusion proteins in Escherichia coli.

Four Rep proteins are encoded by the human parvovirus adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV). The two largest proteins, Rep68 and Rep78, have been shown in vitro to perform several activities related to AAV DNA replication. The Rep78 and Rep68 proteins are likely to be involved in the targeted integration of the AAV DNA into human chromosome 19, and the full characterization of these proteins is important for exploiting this phenomenon for the use of AAV as a vector for gene therapy. To obtain sufficient quantities for facilitating the characterization of the biochemical properties of the Rep proteins, the AAV rep open reading frame was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli as a fusion protein with maltose-binding protein (MBP). Recombinant MBP-Rep68 and MBP-Rep78 proteins displayed the following activities reported for wild-type Rep proteins when assayed in vitro: (i) binding to the AAV inverted terminal repeat (ITR), (ii) helicase activity, (iii) site-specific (terminal resolution site) endonuclease activity, (iv) binding to a sequence within the integration locus for AAV DNA on human chromosome 19, and (v) stimulation of radiolabeling of DNA containing the AAV ITR in a cell extract. These five activities have been described for wild-type Rep produced from mammalian cell extracts. Furthermore, we recharacterized the sequence requirements for Rep binding to the ITR and found that only the A and A' regions are necessary, not the hairpin form of the ITR.     

Adeno-associated virus Rep78 protein and terminal repeats enhance integration of DNA sequences into the cellular genome.

Two adeno-associated virus (AAV) elements are necessary for the integration of the AAV genome: Rep78/68 proteins and inverted terminal repeats (ITRs). To study the contribution of the Rep proteins and the ITRs in the process of integration, we have compared the integration efficiencies of three different plasmids containing a green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression cassette. In one plasmid, no viral sequences were present; a second plasmid contained AAV ITRs flanking the reporter gene (integration cassette), and a third plasmid consisted of an integration cassette plus a Rep78 expression cassette. One day after transfection of 293 cells, fluorescent cells were sorted by flow cytometry and plated at 1 cell per well. Two weeks after sorting, colonies were monitored for stable expression of GFP. Transfection with the GFP plasmid containing no viral sequences resulted in no stable fluorescent colonies. Transfection with the plasmid containing the integration cassette alone (GFP flanked by ITRs) produced stable fluorescent colonies at a frequency of 5.3% +/- 1.0% whereas transfection with the plasmid containing both the integration cassette and Rep78 expression cassette produced stable fluorescent colonies at a frequency of 47% +/- 7.5%. Southern blot analysis indicated that in the presence of Rep78, integration is targeted to the AAVSI site in more than 50% of the clones analyzed. Some clones also showed tandem arrays of the integrated GFP cassette. Both head-to-head and head-to-tail orientations were detected. These findings indicate that the presence of AAV ITRs and the Rep78 protein enhance the integration of DNA sequences into the cellular genome and that the integration cassette is targeted to AAVS1 in the presence of Rep78.     

Charged-to-alanine scanning mutagenesis of the N-terminal half of adeno-associated virus type 2 Rep78 protein

The adeno-associated virus (AAV) Rep78 and Rep68 proteins are required for site-specific integration of the AAV genome into the AAVS1 locus (19q13.3-qter) as well as for viral DNA replication. Rep78 and Rep68 bind to the GAGC motif on the inverted terminal repeat (ITR) and cut at the trs (terminal resolution site). A similar reaction is believed to occur in AAVS1 harboring an analogous GAGC motif and a trs homolog, followed by integration of the AAV genome. To elucidate the functional domains of Rep proteins at the amino acid level, we performed charged-to-alanine scanning mutagenesis of the N terminus (residues 1 to 240) of Rep78, where DNA binding and nicking domains are thought to exist. Mutants were analyzed for their abilities to bind the GAGC motif, nick at the trs homolog, and integrate an ITR-containing plasmid into AAVS1 by electrophoretic mobility shift assay, trs endonuclease assay, and PCR-based integration assay. We identified the residues responsible for DNA binding: R107A, K136A, and R138A mutations completely abolished the binding activity. The H90A or H92A mutant, carrying a mutation in a putative metal binding site, lost nicking activity while retaining binding activity. Mutations affecting DNA binding or trs nicking also impaired the site-specific integration, except for E66A and E239A. These results provide important information on the structure-function relationship of Rep proteins. We also describe an aberrant nicking of Rep78. We found that Rep78 cuts predominantly at the trs homolog not only between the T residues (GGT/TGG), but also between the G and T residues (GG/TTGG), which may be influenced by the sequence surrounding the GAGC motif.     

Mutational analysis of the adeno-associated virus Rep68 protein: identification of critical residues necessary for site-specific endonuclease activity.

The Rep68 and Rep78 proteins of adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) are multifunctional proteins which contain overlapping amino acid sequences. They are required for viral replication and preferential integration of the AAV genome into a region of human chromosome 19. During the terminal resolution process of AAV DNA replication, these proteins make a site-specific and strand-specific endonuclease cut within the AAV inverted terminal repeat DNA. The Rep68 and Rep78 proteins also have helicase and DNA-binding activities. The endonuclease activity is believed to involve the covalent attachment of Rep68 or Rep78 at the cut site via a phosphotyrosine linkage. In an attempt to identify the active-site tyrosine residue of Rep78 and Rep68, tyrosine residues were site specifically mutated to phenylalanines by overlap extension PCR, and the resulting PCR fragments were cloned into a maltose binding protein-Rep68 fusion (MBP-Rep68delta) expression vector. The mutant MBP-Rep68delta proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli cells, purified with amylose resin, and assayed in vitro for Rep68-specific activities. Although several of the mutations disrupted the endonuclease activity, only the mutation of tyrosine 152 abrogated the endonuclease activity with no discernible effect on the helicase or DNA-binding activities. Our data therefore suggest that there are distinct active sites for the helicase and endonuclease activities.     

Comparative characterization of rep proteins from the helper-dependent adeno-associated virus type 2 and the autonomous goose parvovirus

Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are nonautonomous human parvoviruses in that they are dependent on helper functions supplied by other viruses or on genotoxic stimuli for conditions permissive for replication. In the absence of helper, AAV type 2 enters latency by integration into a specific site on human chromosome 19. This feature of AAV, in combination with a lack of pathogenicity, makes AAV an attractive candidate vector for human gene therapy. Goose parvovirus (GPV) is both autonomous and pathogenic yet is highly homologous to AAV. To address the molecular bases for the different viral lifestyles, we compare the AAV and GPV nonstructural proteins, Rep78 and Rep1, respectively. We find that Rep78 and Rep1 possess several biochemical activities in common, including (i) high-affinity DNA binding for sequences that constitute the minimal DNA replication origin; (ii) nucleoside triphosphate-dependent DNA helicase activity; and (iii) origin-specific replication of double-stranded linear DNA. These experiments also establish a specific 38-bp DNA sequence as the minimal GPV DNA replication origin. It is noteworthy that although the proposed Rep binding sites of GPV and AAV are highly similar, Rep1 and Rep78 show a high degree of specificity for their respective origins, in both binding and replication assays. One significant difference was observed; with the minimal replication origin in adenovirus-uninfected extracts, Rep78-mediated replication exhibited low processivity, as previously reported. In contrast, Rep1 efficiently replicated full-length template. Overall, our studies indicate that GPV Rep1 and AAV Rep78 support a comparable mode of replication. Thus, a comparison of the two proteins provides a model system with which to determine the contribution of Rep in the regulation of dependence and autonomy at the level of DNA replication.     

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 5 Rep protein cleaves a unique terminal resolution site compared with other AAV serotypes

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) replication depends on two viral components for replication: the AAV nonstructural proteins (Rep) in trans, and inverted terminal repeat (ITR) sequences in cis. AAV type 5 (AAV5) is a distinct virus compared to the other cloned AAV serotypes. Whereas the Rep proteins and ITRs of other serotypes are interchangeable and can be used to produce recombinant viral particles of a different serotype, AAV5 Rep proteins cannot cross-complement in the packaging of a genome with an AAV2 ITR. In vitro replication assays indicated that the block occurs at the level of replication instead of at viral assembly. AAV2 and AAV5 Rep binding activities demonstrate similar affinities for either an AAV2 or AAV5 ITR; however, comparison of terminal resolution site (TRS) endonuclease activities showed a difference in specificity for the two DNA sequences. AAV2 Rep78 cleaved only a type 2 ITR DNA sequence, and AAV5 Rep78 cleaved only a type 5 probe efficiently. Mapping of the AAV5 ITR TRS identified a distinct cleavage site (AGTG TGGC) which is absent from the ITRs of other AAV serotypes. Comparison of the TRSs in the AAV2 ITR, the AAV5 ITR, and the AAV chromosome 19 integration locus identified some conserved nucleotides downstream of the cleavage site but little homology upstream.     

Analysis of the Effects of Charge Cluster Mutations in Adeno-Associated Virus Rep68 Protein In Vitro

The Rep78 and Rep68 proteins of adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) are multifunctional proteins which are required for viral replication, regulation of AAV promoters, and preferential integration of the AAV genome into a region of human chromosome 19. These proteins bind the hairpin structures formed by the AAV inverted terminal repeat (ITR) origins of replication, make site- and strand-specific endonuclease cuts within the AAV ITRs, and display nucleoside triphosphate-dependent helicase activities. Additionally, several mutant Rep proteins display negative dominance in helicase and/or endonuclease assays when they are mixed with wild-type Rep78 or Rep68, suggesting that multimerization may be required for the helicase and endonuclease functions. Using overlap extension PCR mutagenesis, we introduced mutations within clusters of charged residues throughout the Rep68 moiety of a maltose binding protein-Rep68 fusion protein (MBP-Rep68Δ) expressed in Escherichia coli cells. Several mutations disrupted the endonuclease and helicase activities; however, only one amino-terminal-charge cluster mutant protein (D40A-D42A-D44A) completely lost AAV hairpin DNA binding activity. Charge cluster mutations within two other regions abolished both endonuclease and helicase activities. One region contains a predicted alpha-helical structure (amino acids 371 to 393), and the other contains a putative 3,4 heptad repeat (coiled-coil) structure (amino acids 441 to 483). The defects displayed by these mutant proteins correlated with a weaker association with wild-type Rep68 protein, as measured in coimmunoprecipitation assays. These experiments suggest that these regions of the Rep molecule are involved in Rep oligomerization events critical for both helicase and endonuclease activities.     

Conditional site-specific integration into human chromosome 19 by using a ligand-dependent chimeric adeno-associated virus/Rep protein

It is of great interest for gene therapy to develop vectors that drive the insertion of a therapeutic gene into a chosen specific site on the cellular genome. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is unique among mammalian viruses in that it integrates into a distinct region of human chromosome 19 (integration site AAVS1). The inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) flanking the AAV genome and the AAV-encoded nonstructural proteins Rep78 and/or Rep68 are the only viral elements necessary and sufficient for site-specific integration. However, it is also known that unrestrained Rep activity may cause nonspecific genomic rearrangements at AAVS1 and/or have detrimental effects on cell physiology. In this paper we describe the generation of a ligand-dependent form of Rep, obtained by fusing a C-terminally deleted Rep68 with a truncated form of the hormone binding domain of the human progesterone receptor, which does not bind progesterone but binds only its synthetic antagonist RU486. The activity of this chimeric protein, named Rep1-491/P, is highly dependent on RU486 in various assays: in particular, it triggers site-specific integration at AAVS1 of an ITR-flanked cassette in a ligand-dependent manner, as efficiently as wild-type Rep68 but without generating unwanted genomic rearrangement at AAVS1.     

Evidence for covalent attachment of the adeno-associated virus (AAV) rep protein to the ends of the AAV genome.

We have demonstrated that when the covalently joined ends of linear adeno-associated virus (AAV) DNA are resolved in vitro, the virus-encoded Rep protein becomes covalently attached to the 5' ends of the DNA. The covalent bond is between a tyrosine residue of the AAV Rep protein and a 5' phosphate of a thymidine residue in the AAV genome. Only the Rep protein encoded by the AAV p5 promoter, Rep68, was capable of becoming covalently attached to the ends of the AAV genome; the Rep proteins encoded by the p19 promoter were not. We also investigated some of the requirements for the complete in vitro resolution reaction. Inhibitor studies suggested that terminal resolution required DNA polymerase delta, ATP, and the deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates but did not require the remaining ribonucleoside triphosphates, DNA polymerase alpha, RNA polymerase II, or topoisomerases I and II. Finally, purified AAV Rep68, when added to the crude cytosol from uninfected HeLa cells, was sufficient for resolution. This suggested that terminal resolution relies on host enzymes and the virus-encoded p5 Rep proteins.     

High-level expression of adeno-associated virus (AAV) Rep78 or Rep68 protein is sufficient for infectious-particle formation by a rep-negative AAV mutant.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) codes for four closely related nonstructural proteins (Rep) required for AAV DNA replication and gene regulation. In vitro studies have revealed that either Rep78 or Rep68 alone is sufficient for AAV DNA replication. Rep52 and Rep40 are not required for DNA replication but have been reported to enhance the efficiency of accumulation of single-stranded progeny DNA. Previous studies on rep-expressing cell lines had indicated that only a subset of the four Rep proteins are required for the production of infectious AAV. We therefore set out to determine the minimal set of Rep proteins sufficient for the generation of infectious AAV. Transient cotransfections in HeLa cells of constructs for high-level expression of individual Rep proteins with a rep-negative AAV genome revealed that either Rep78 or Rep68 alone could complement for a full replication cycle yielding infectious virus. This result was confirmed by transfection studies in the cell line HeM2, which selectively expresses Rep78 at rather low levels under the control of the glucocorticoid-responsive mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat (C. Hölscher, M. Hörer, J. A. Kleinschmidt, H. Zentgraf, A. Bürkle, and R. Heilbronn, J. Virol. 68:7169-7177, 1994). Increasing the level of Rep78 expression by transfection of a glucocorticoid receptor expression construct resulted in a higher level of DNA replication of a cotransfected rep-negative AAV genome and in the production of infectious rep-negative AAV particles. We further report on the generation of a new rep-expressing cell line, HeCM1, which was obtained by stable supertransfection of a construct for constitutive Rep40 expression into HeM1 cells (Hölscher et al., J. Virol. 68:7169-7177). Transfection of rather large amounts of rep-negative AAV DNA led to detectable virus production in HeCM1 cells even in the absence of the cotransfected glucocorticoid receptor expression construct, but higher yields were obtained after increasing the Rep78 level by coexpression of the glucocorticoid receptor. These data demonstrate that all Rep functions required for the productive replication of AAV in HeLa cells are contained within both Rep78 and Rep68.     

Integration Preferences of Wildtype AAV-2 for Consensus Rep-Binding Sites at Numerous Loci in the Human Genome

Adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) is known to establish latency by preferential integration in human chromosome 19q13.42. The AAV non-structural protein Rep appears to target a site called AAVS1 by simultaneously binding to Rep-binding sites (RBS) present on the AAV genome and within AAVS1. In the absence of Rep, as is the case with AAV vectors, chromosomal integration is rare and random. For a genome-wide survey of wildtype AAV integration a linker-selection-mediated (LSM)-PCR strategy was designed to retrieve AAV-chromosomal junctions. DNA sequence determination revealed wildtype AAV integration sites scattered over the entire human genome. The bioinformatic analysis of these integration sites compared to those of rep-deficient AAV vectors revealed a highly significant overrepresentation of integration events near to consensus RBS. Integration hotspots included AAVS1 with 10% of total events. Novel hotspots near consensus RBS were identified on chromosome 5p13.3 denoted AAVS2 and on chromsome 3p24.3 denoted AAVS3. AAVS2 displayed seven independent junctions clustered within only 14 bp of a consensus RBS which proved to bind Rep in vitro similar to the RBS in AAVS3. Expression of Rep in the presence of rep-deficient AAV vectors shifted targeting preferences from random integration back to the neighbourhood of consensus RBS at hotspots and numerous additional sites in the human genome. In summary, targeted AAV integration is not as specific for AAVS1 as previously assumed. Rather, Rep targets AAV to integrate into open chromatin regions in the reach of various, consensus RBS homologues in the human genome.