下颌种植覆盖义齿的生物力学研究进展

口腔生物力学是用生物力学的概念和方法,研究口腔医学中的有关基础性科学问题、解决口腔医学中的临床实际问题、发展口腔临床技术的一门学科。在口腔正畸学、修复学、种植学及口腔颌面外科学等领域存在着大量的生物力学问题,生物力学已成为口腔医学的基础科学之一。传统全口义齿修复常常会出现固位稳定差、咀嚼效率低、患者有疼痛感、适应时间长等情况,很大程度上不能满足患者的修复要求。种植覆盖义齿对于下颌牙槽嵴严重吸收的患者,效果尤为明显。种植覆盖义齿是义齿与种植体之间以不同的附着体作为连接,形成患者可以自行摘戴的种植体支持的覆盖义齿修复。下颌种植覆盖义齿因其能有效地提高下半口义齿的固位性和稳定性、显著提高了患者的咀嚼效率,目前已成为修复下颌牙槽骨严重吸收的无牙颌患者的有效修复方法。本文针对下颌种植覆盖义齿的生物力学研究进展作一综述。     

磁性附着体在全口覆盖义齿中的应用

目的：观察磁性附着体在全口覆盖义齿中的临床应用。方法：选择两组全口义齿修复者,实验组采用Magnetic Ex-600磁性附着体,并对两组全口义齿的咀嚼效率进行测试。结果：磁性附着体全口义齿咀嚼效率可得到明显地提高,结论：磁性附着体对改善全口覆盖义齿的咀嚼功能有明显的作用。     

利用共振频率分析牙种植体骨愈合期稳定性变化 与早期边缘骨吸收的关系

目的:利用共振频率测量仪(Osstell)连续监测骨愈合期种植体稳定性变化与早期边缘骨吸收的关系。方法:本研究于2010-2011年期间根据纳入及排除标准连续纳入32名成年男性患者作为实验对象共植入45枚Strauman种植体,每名患者选择一颗(4.8mm×10mm)种植体,共计32颗种植体,种植区位于下颌后牙(骨质均为Ⅱ或Ⅲ类骨)。利用共振频率分析仪(Osstell)测量种植体的稳定性,测量时间点为植入时以及术后第1,2,3,4,6,8,12周。另外,影像学分析测量32颗种植体12周时的边缘骨吸收;结果:本实验中所有种植体在12周均实现骨结合,并成功完成种植修复。通过重复性方差分析,见表1,在种植体植入时,初期稳定系数(ISQ)均值为(79.03±6.756)。术后一周,种植体稳定系数(ISQ)均值均呈下降趋势,至术后第2周时达到最低点,与植入时稳定性有统计学差异(P<0.05)。从术后第3周开始种植体稳定系数(ISQ)均值逐渐上升。其中,稳定系数(ISQ)均值在第6周时与第12周无统计学差异,已达到延期稳定期。32颗种植体在第12周的边缘骨吸收均值为(0.86±0.068mm),而在第12周的种植体的稳定系数均值与种植体植入时的稳定系数均值无统计学差异。结论:本实验通过共振频率测量仪(OsstellTM)连续监测,目前的结果认为种植体愈合期边缘骨吸收对种植体愈合期稳定性变化没有影响。     

OSFE植骨与不植骨种植修复的临床效果对比研究

目的:比较上颌窦挤压内提升(OSFE)植骨与不植骨种植修复的临床效果。方法:选择上颌后牙区种植修复的35例患者,其剩余牙槽嵴高度(RBH)为4~8 mm,共植入43颗种植体。A组16例患者为植骨组,20个种植位点,牙槽骨可用骨高度平均(5.87±1.19)mm,植入人工骨粉后植入种植体;B组19例患者为不植骨组,23个种植位点,缺牙区牙槽骨可用骨高度平均(5.67±1.10)mm,上颌窦提升后直接植入种植体。6个月后行二期手术完成修复。采用临床检查、X线检查及视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)进行效果评价。结果:两组病例的牙槽嵴高度差异比较无统计学意义。在平均约36.7个月的随访期内,A组种植体的存留率为100%(20/20),B组中有1枚种植体因咬合力过大及口腔卫生较差脱落,种植体的存留率为95.6%(22/23),两组病例的存留率比较无统计学差异。两组患者的VAS值比较亦相当。所有种植体骨结合良好,种植体周围软组织无炎症,种植义齿咀嚼功能良好。结论:在严格控制适应症、准确掌握种植技巧的前提下,RBH在4~8 mm之间的病例无需额外植入骨代替材料即可取得理想的修复效果,简化了手术的操作,减少了手术的风险和创伤,节省了手术的时间和费用,易被患者接受。     

Dentis种植系统的临床效果观察

目的：探讨Dentis种植系统的临床应用效果。方法：对132例牙列缺损患者行Dentis种植体植入,3-6个月后行上部义齿修复,并进行临床和放射学的随访观察。结果：206枚种植体中有2枚在修复后6个月内脱落,其余未见松动、脱落和植入体根周X射线透射区,留存率99.0%,成功率99.0%。结论：选择合适的病例,配合应用相应术式,Dentis种植系统的临床应用效果良好。     

XIVE种植体即刻植入即刻负重的临床观察

目的：评价XIVE种植体在上颌外伤前牙区即刻种植即刻负重修复的临床效果。方法：对26例前牙区单颗或多颗无法保留的外伤残根拔除后,即刻植入XIVE种植体,并即刻负重修复。种植体扭矩控制在35Ncm左右,初期稳定性良好。平均四到五个月后行永久修复。在植入后1、2、4个月对其进行临床及影像学检查。结果：32枚种植体有2枚种植体2周后出现松动,一个月后脱落,其余30枚均在预期时间内形成良好骨性愈合,最终完成修复。结论：上颌前牙区单颗或多颗牙外伤,残根无法保留者,行即刻种植即刻负重修复是可行。早期种植修复有利于减缓牙槽骨的吸收,保留软硬组织的形态,缩短疗程。     

种植体稳定系数测定与种植体负重时机选择

目的:通过测量ITI和Osstem-SS种植系统的稳定系数(ISQ),评价这两种种植体的骨结合情况,为临床确定其上部结构修复时机提供依据。方法:93例牙列缺损患者共植入179颗种植体,根据患者种植区骨量情况分为两组,其中A组为种植区骨量良好,不需骨增量手术病例(62例);B组为种植区骨量不足,需进行骨增量手术病例(31例)。A组共植入125颗种植体,其中ITI种植系统64颗,OSSTEM-SS种植系统61颗;B组共植入54颗种植体,其中ITI种植系统28颗,OSSTEM-SS种植系统26颗。术后即刻及第4、6、8、12、16、24周分别测量各时期种植体稳定系数(ISQ),并同期进行临床和影像学检查。结果:A组中ITI种植系统术后8周ISQ值平均(74.17±1.85),进行负重;OSSTEM-SS种植系统术后12周ISQ值平均(72.00±2.59),进行负重。B组中ITI种植系统术后16周ISQ值平均(65.09±3.42),进行负重;OSSTEM-SS种植系统术后24周ISQ值平均(62.09±6.16),进行负重。负重后临床随访3-24个月所有病例均成功,咀嚼功能良好,患者满意。结论:种植体稳定系数(ISQ)能反应种植体骨结合情况,可以协助医生选择种植后合适的冠修复时机。     

种植修复后牙周菌群在不同时期变化的定量研究

目的观察种植修复后牙周菌群在不同时期的变化,比较牙周病人群和健康人群种植术后菌群分布差异。方法选择牙种植患者28例,接受37颗种植修复（无牙周病史19颗,有牙周病史18颗）,采取前后对照设计。采用细菌分离鉴定及菌落形成单位计数的检测方法,以正常同名天然牙为基线对照,追踪观察愈合基台龈袖口、全冠修复后1周、负荷12个月后牙龈沟菌丛变化情况。结果种植体龈沟液内的细菌数量增加构成日趋复杂,在愈合基台期细菌数量最低,冠修复后1年,两组人群的菌群数量和构成差异有显著性（P〈0．05）,而健康人群成功种植体和天然牙有相似的菌群构成;但以往有牙周病史的患者,种植体植入区域内普遍有牙周病原体量的增加。结论随着时间的延长,具有牙周病史的患者的种植体周围炎的风险增加。     

XIVE 种植体即刻植入即刻负重的临床观察

目的:评价XIVE种植体在上颌外伤前牙区即刻种植即刻负重修复的临床效果。方法:对26例前牙区单颗或多颗无法保留的外伤残根拔除后,即刻植入XIVE种植体,并即刻负重修复。种植体扭矩控制在35Ncm左右,初期稳定性良好。平均四到五个月后行永久修复。在植入后1、2、4个月对其进行临床及影像学检查。结果:32枚种植体有2枚种植体2周后出现松动,一个月后脱落,其余30枚均在预期时间内形成良好骨性愈合,最终完成修复。结论:上颌前牙区单颗或多颗牙外伤,残根无法保留者,行即刻种植即刻负重修复是可行。早期种植修复有利于减缓牙槽骨的吸收,保留软硬组织的形态,缩短疗程。     

氧化锆基台的制作及其与钛基台抗折强度的比较

目的：制作氧化锆基台并将其与钛基台的抗折强度相比较,从而探讨其临床应用的可行性。方法：选用纳米氧化锆粉,采用冷等静压成型和二次烧结工艺制作0sstem USⅡ系统氧化锆基台;选取氧化锆基台和成品钛基台（OSSTEM公司,韩国）各10枚,分别与0sstem USⅡ种植体装配,然后固定于不锈钢夹具中置于万能试验机,将万能试验机压头与种植体长轴成90°角施加压力,记录基台损坏时的加载力值,比较分析两组试件的强度差异。结果：氧化锆基台和钛基台的平均抗折强度分别为（540.5±84.6）N和（753.9±160.8）N,差别有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。氧化锆基台组10枚基台全部颈部折裂;钛基台组2枚种植体损坏,6枚中央固位螺钉损坏,2枚基台颈部折裂。结论：本研究制作的0sstem USⅡ系统的氧化锆基台的抗折强度虽然低于钛基台,但尚能满足临床应用要求。     

The influence of mandibular implant-retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency

doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2011.00539.x The influence of mandibular implant‐retained overdentures in masticatory efficiency Objective: To evaluate the masticatory efficiency of patients rehabilitated with conventional dentures (CDs) or implant‐retained mandibular overdentures. Background: Despite the evident benefits of implants on mastication as assessed by subjective patient‐based outcomes, the extent of implant overdenture treatment effect on food comminution is not well established. Materials and methods: A randomised clinical trial was carried out with 29 completely edentulous patients divided into two groups. The first group was rehabilitated with a mandibular overdenture retained by two splinted implants with bar‐clip system, while the second group was rehabilitated with a mandibular CD. Both groups also were rehabilitated with maxillary CDs. Masticatory efficiency and patient satisfaction were assessed 3 months after denture insertion. Masticatory efficiency was evaluated through the colorimetric method with the beads as the artificial test‐food. Comparisons for masticatory efficiency and patient satisfaction were performed using Student’s t‐test (α = 0.05). Results: No significant statistical difference was found for masticatory efficiency (p = 0.198). Patient overall satisfaction was significantly higher for the mandibular overdenture (p < 0.001). In addition, mandibular overdenture patients were significantly more satisfied with chewing experience (p < 0.05) and retention of the lower denture (p < 0.005). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that mandibular overdenture significantly improves chewing experience, although limited effect on masticatory efficiency has been observed.     

The effect of different attachment systems with implant‐retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG

doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.00389.x The effect of different attachment systems with implant‐retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG Objective: To compare the effect of different attachment systems with implant‐retained overdentures on maximum bite force and muscle activity using electromyography (EMG). Background: Denture retention and stability is of considerable interest in prosthetic dentistry. Materials and methods: Thirty‐five patients were examined: 15 edentulous patients treated with mandibular implant‐retained overdentures (MIRO) and maxillary dentures (MCD) (two implant‐ball attachment) (BC); 10 edentulous patients treated with MIRO and MCD (four implants‐bar attachments) (BRC); 10 patients with edentulous mandibular treated with MIRO and maxillary fixed partial dentures (MFPD) (two implant‐ball attachments) (BF). Before implant placement all patients received new dentures. After using these dentures for 3 months the maximum bite force and electrical activity of masseter muscle were measured. Two or four implants were then inserted into the intraforaminal region. After osseointegration periods, patients were treated with MIRO which duplicated their dentures and after three months the measurements were repeated. The data were collected and statistically analysed. Results: Muscle activity and chewing ability increased in the second period of measurements. Also chewing time was significantly decreased at the first measurements. The highest muscle activity was observed in the group of patients treated with group BF. Conclusion: The EMG values of the masseter muscle significantly increased when an implant attachments was used in the overdenture.     

The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers

doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2011.00531.x The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant‐retained overdenture wearers Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of life and patient satisfaction outcomes of two attachment systems in mandibular overdentures with different numbers of supporting implants. Materials and methods: Sixty‐two edentulous patients with either splinted or single attachments in mandibular implant overdentures with different numbers of supporting interforaminal implants were investigated for patient satisfaction and quality of life in this retrospective study. Comparisons between groups were perceived by the Mann–Whitney U test. Relations among the parameters were investigated by Spearman’s rho correlation analysis. The results were evaluated statistically at a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: No statistically significant association is found between visual analogue scales scores and attachment type as well as implant number (p > 0.05), whereas Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)‐14 total scores for patients with 4‐implant‐supported bars were significantly lower than all the other attachment types (p < 0.05). Additionally, a negative (rate = 32.2%), statistically significant association between period of edentulism and total OHIP‐14 scores was detected (p < 0.05). Conclusions: A mandibular implant‐retained overdenture supported with four implants and bar attachments shows the highest ‘quality of life’ score and patient satisfaction is not influenced by the number of implants or attachment type.     

Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants: a finite element analysis

This study investigates the bone/implant mechanical responses in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on two conventional regular dental implants (RDI) and four mini dental implants (MDI) using finite element (FE) analysis. Two FE models of overdentures retained by RDIs and MDIs for a mandibular edentulous patient with validation within 6% variation errors were constructed by integrating CT images and CAD system. Bone grafting resulted in 2 mm thickness at the buccal side constructed for the RDIs-supported model to mimic the bone augmentation condition for the atrophic alveolar ridge. Nonlinear hyperelastic material and frictional contact element were used to simulate characteristic of the ball attachment-retained overdentures. The results showed that a denture supported by MDIs presented higher surrounding bone strains than those supported by RDIs under different load conditions. Maximum bone micro strains were up to 6437/2987 and 13323/5856 for MDIs/RDIs under single centric and lateral contacts, respectively. Corresponding values were 4429/2579 and 9557/5774 under multi- centric and lateral contacts, respectively. Bone micro strains increased 2.06 and 1.96-folds under single contact, 2.16 and 2.24-folds under multiple contacts for MDIs and RDIs when lateral to axial loads were compared. The maximum RDIs and MDIs implant stresses in all simulated cases were found by far lower than their yield strength. Overdentures retained using ball attachments on MDIs in poor edentulous bone structure increase the surrounding bone strain over the critical value, thereby damaging the bone when compared to the RDIs. Eliminating the occlusal single contact and oblique load of an implant-retained overdenture reduces the risk for failure.     

Implant supported dentures: an estimation of chewing efficiency

doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2009.00303.x
Implant supported dentures: an estimation of chewing efficiency Background: Treatment of edentulous patients is one of the most demanding tasks the dentist can meet in his everyday practice. Implant based methods help to improve functioning of dentures and life quality of so treated patients. Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the chewing efficiency of patients treated with lower complete implant‐supported overdentures and the simultaneous evaluation of treatment results by patients. Materials and methods: For the investigation were chosen edentulous patients, treated with upper conventional complete dentures and lower complete overdentures supported on two implants. In this group of patients, were conducted investigations of chewing efficiency changes, based on the Optocal test and overdentures functioning evaluation made by patients in the survey. Results: The objective evaluation of the chewing efficiency indicated the decrease of this value in the five years of observations. Lower complete overdentures supported on implants significantly increased the comfort of chewing of edentulous patients. Conclusions: The results of the study let us to assess positively the result of the therapy using titanium implants and lower complete overdentures. The therapy described significantly increases the life comfort of the edentulous patients. Decreasing chewing efficiency indicated by the research result should be compensated with the dentures maintaining or the prostheses exchange after about five years of use.     

Implant overdentures for edentulous elders: study of patient preference

Background: Studies show that elders wearing implant overdentures have improved nutrition and quality of life. However, upfront costs of this therapy are high, and the income of elderly edentulous populations is low. Objectives: This study was designed (i) to measure the preferences of edentulous patients for mandibular two‐implant overdentures using Willingness‐To‐Pay (WTP) and Willingness‐To‐Accept (WTA), (ii) to assess the effect of long‐term financing on WTP and (iii) to assess the desired role of health care plans in financing dental prostheses. Methods: Edentulous elders (68–79 years; n = 36) wearing maxillary dentures and either a mandibular conventional denture (CD, n = 13) or a two‐implant overdenture with ball attachments (IOD, n = 23) participated in this study. All had received their prostheses 2 years previously, as part of a randomised clinical trial. A three‐part questionnaire was completed during a 20‐min interview with a trained researcher. Results: Forty‐six per cent (6/13) of the CD wearers and 70% (16/23) of the IOD wearers were willing to pay three times more than the current cost of conventional dentures for implant prostheses. These percentages were increased to 77% (CD) and 96% (IOD) if participants could pay for implant overdentures in monthly instalments. Eighty‐six per cent (31/36) of all participants in both groups (21/23 IOD; 10/13 CD) thought that the government should cover at least some of the cost of implant overdentures. Conclusions: This study shows that, the majority of elderly edentate individuals who have not experienced mandibular two‐implant overdenture therapy are willing to pay the cost, particularly when payment can be made in monthly instalments.     

Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among elderly edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the satisfaction and the quality of life in an elderly population using either mandibular conventional dentures or implant‐retained overdentures. Materials and methods: A total of 34 patients were divided into two groups: group I – complete dentures users; group II – users of upper complete dentures opposed by implant‐retained overdentures. The subjects were submitted to a questionnaire based on Oral Health Impact Profile and oral health related quality of life to evaluate their satisfaction levels and quality of life with their prostheses. Data were evaluated using a non‐parametric statistical analysis (Fischer test) with significant difference at α = 0.05. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in relation to comfort, aesthetics, chewing ability, overall satisfaction, pain, functional, phonetic, social, and psychological limitations (p > 0.05). Comparing the stability of mandibular dentures, group II presented the better results (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Although the stability of the mandibular implant‐retained overdenture was enhanced compared to a conventional denture, the quality of life and satisfaction levels were similar for both the groups.     

Comparison between two low profile attachments for implant mandibular overdentures

ObjectiveIn this research it was aimed to evaluate stress distribution on the implants supporting a complete overdenture in addition to compare between two different types of low-profile attachments for implant-retained mandibular overdenture with two techniques (with/without using connecting bar).Materials and methodsTwo 3D finite element models were constructed simulating supported lower complete overdenture with two implants and with two implants and bar. Where, models components were modeled in 3D on commercial general purpose CAD/CAM software. Four runs were carried out, two runs on each model, as linear static analysis.ResultsUsing bar is generally preferred for mucosa and cortical bone, while its effect can be considered as negligible on overdenture. On the other hand, it slightly increases the stresses on spongy bone. Using bar ensures the same level of energy transfer to the spongy bone and increases its maximum Von Mises stresses by about 50%. In addition, increase in maximum Von Mises stress was noticed by about 1% on cortical bone.ConclusionUsing bar is not recommended for patients with flat ridge.     

Clinical feasibility of mandibular implant overdenture retainers submitted to immediate load

Gerodontology 2010; doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.00374.x
Clinical feasibility of mandibular implant overdenture retainers submitted to immediate load Introduction: Millions of people around the world do not have access to the benefits of osseointegration. Treatments involving oral rehabilitation with overdentures have been widely used by specialists in the oral medicine field. This is an alternative therapy for retention and stability achievement in total prosthesis with conventional treatment, and two implants are enough to establish a satisfactory overdenture. Objective: The objectives of the study were to evaluate 16 patients of both sexes, with an average age of 47.4 ± 4 years, using electromyographic analysis of masseter and temporal muscles and analyse the increase of incisive and molar maximal bite force with their existing complete dentures and following mandibular implant overdenture therapy to assess the benefits of this treatment. Materials and methods: For these tests, the Myosystem‐BR1 electromyograph and the IDDK Kratos dynamometer were used. Statistical analysis was performed using the repeated measures test (SPSS 17.0). Results: A decrease in electromyographic activity during the rest, lateral and protrusion movements and increase of the maximal incisive and molar bite force after 15 months with a mandibular implant overdenture was observed. Conclusion: All the patients in this study reported a considerable improvement in the masticatory function and prostheses stability following treatment. It is possible to propose that the use of mandibular implants overdenture should become the selected treatment for totally edentulous patients to facilitate oral function and quality of life.