In vivo time-lapse imaging of synaptic takeover associated with naturally occurring synapse elimination

During development, competition between axons causes permanent removal of synaptic connections, but the dynamics have not been directly observed. Using transgenic mice that express two spectral variants of fluorescent proteins in motor axons, we imaged competing axons at developing neuromuscular junctions in vivo. Typically, one axon withdrew progressively from postsynaptic sites and the competing axon extended axonal processes to occupy those sites. In rare instances when the remaining axon did not reoccupy a site, the postsynaptic receptors rapidly disappeared. Interestingly, the progress and outcome of competition was unpredictable. Moreover, the relative areas occupied by the competitors shifted in favor of one axon and then the other. These results show synaptic competition is not always monotonic and that one axon's contraction in synaptic area is associated with another axon's expansion.     

Seeking long-term relationship: axon and target communicate to organize synaptic differentiation

Synapses form after growing axons recognize their appropriate targets. The subsequent assembly of aligned pre and postsynaptic specializations is critical for synaptic function. This highly precise apposition of presynaptic elements (i.e. active zones) to postsynaptic specializations (i.e. neurotransmitter receptor clusters) strongly suggests that communication between the axon and target is required for synaptic differentiation. What trans‐synaptic factors drive such differentiation at vertebrate synapses? First insights into the answers to this question came from studies at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), where axon‐derived agrin and muscle‐derived laminin β2 induce post and presynaptic differentiation, respectively. Recent work has suggested that axon‐ and target‐derived factors similarly drive synaptic differentiation at central synapses. Specifically, WNT‐7a, neuroligin, synaptic cell adhesion molecule (SynCAM) and fibroblast growth factor‐22 (FGF‐22) have all been identified as target‐derived presynaptic organizers, whereas axon‐derived neuronal activity regulated pentraxin (Narp), ephrinB and neurexin reciprocally co‐ordinate postsynaptic differentiation. In addition to these axon‐ and target‐derived inducers of synaptic differentiation, factors released from glial cells have also been implicated in regulating synapse assembly. Together, these recent findings have profoundly advanced our understanding of how precise appositions are established during vertebrate nervous system development.     

Synapse Regeneration, Axon Sprouting and Degeneration in the Central Nervous System of the Leech

SYNOPSIS. Detailed know ledge of the projections and synapticconnections of identifiable neurons in the leech has permitteda similarly detailed study of the sprouting, regeneration, anddegeneration of axons We have learned that certain cellularcomponents, such as synaptic targets and gha, may play onlya limned role in synapse regeneration and in axon degenerationYet contact with the synaptic target may inhibit sprouting andavailability of targets may promote it Overall, results in theleech support the idea that degeneration as well as regenerationshare fundamental mechanisms with other invertebrates and thevertebrates including mammals.     

Directional guidance of nerve growth cones

The intricate connections of the nervous system are established, in part, by elongating axonal fibers that are directed by complex guidance systems to home in on their specific targets. The growth cone, the major motile apparatus at the tip of axons, explores its surroundings and steers the axon along a defined path to its appropriate target. Significant progress has been made in identifying the guidance molecules and receptors that regulate growth cone pathfinding, the signaling cascades underlying distinct growth cone behaviors, and the cytoskeletal components that give rise to the directional motility of the growth cone. Recent studies have also shed light on the sophisticated mechanisms and new players utilized by the growth cone during pathfinding. It is clear that axon pathfinding requires a growth cone to sample and integrate various signals both in space and in time, and subsequently to coordinate the dynamics of its membrane, cytoskeleton and adhesion to generate specific responses.     

Reinnervation of muscle fiber basal lamina after removal of myofibers. Differentiation of regenerating axons at original synaptic sites

Axons regenerate to reinnervate denervated skeletal muscle fibers precisely at original synaptic sites, and they differentiate into nerve terminals where they contact muscle fibers. The aim of this study was to determine the location of factors that influence the growth and differentiation of the regenerating axons. We damaged and denervated frog muscles, causing myofibers and nerve terminals to degenerate, and then irradiated the animals to prevent regeneration of myofibers. The sheath of basal lamina (BL) that surrounds each myofiber survives these treatments, and original synaptic sites on BL can be recognized by several histological criteria after nerve terminals and muscle cells have been completely removed. Axons regenerate into the region of damage within 2 wk. They contact surviving BL almost exclusively at original synaptic sites; thus, factors that guide the axon's growth are present at synaptic sites and stably maintained outside of the myofiber. Portions of axons that contact the BL acquire active zones and accumulations of synaptic vesicles; thus by morphological criteria they differentiate into nerve terminals even though their postsynaptic targets, the myofibers, are absent. Within the terminals, the synaptic organelles line up opposite periodic specializations in the myofiber's BL, demonstrating that components associated with the BL play a role in organizing the differentiation of the nerve terminal.     

Disruption of peripheral target contact influences the development of identified central dendritic branches in a leech motor neuron in vivo

Retrograde signaling from target tissues has been shown to influence many aspects of neuronal development in a number of developmental systems. In these experiments using embryonic leeches (Hirudo medicinalis), we examined how depriving a neuron of contact with its peripheral target affects the development of the cell's central arborization. We focused our attention on the motor neuron cell 3, which normally stimulates dorsal longitudinal muscle fibers to contract. At different locations in the periphery and in embryos of several different stages, we cut the nerve containing the growing axon of cell 3. This surgery led to dramatic overgrowth of cell 3's central dendritic branches, which normally accept synaptic contacts from other neurons, including the inhibitory motor neuron cell 1. When cell 3's peripheral axon was cut relatively early in development, its overgrown central branches eventually retracted. However, cells that were disrupted later in development retained their overextended branches into adulthood. In addition, if the axon was cut close to the ganglion early in development, depriving the cell of contact with any dorsal tissues, the central branches failed to retract and were instead retained into adulthood. Unlike cell 3, the central branches of cell 1, which has the same peripheral target muscles as cell 3, remained unchanged following all axotomy protocols. These results suggest that in at least some neurons contact with peripheral targets can influence development of the central processes that normally mediate synaptic contacts.     

Dynamic responses of Xenopus retinal ganglion cell axon growth cones to netrin-1 as they innervate their in vivo target

Netrin-1 influences retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon pathfinding and also participates in the branching and synaptic differentiation of mature RGC axons at their target. To investigate whether netrin also serves as an early target recognition signal in the brain, we examined the dynamic behavior of Xenopus RGC axons soon after they innervate the optic tectum. Time-lapse confocal microscopy imaging of RGC axons expressing enhanced yellow fluorescent protein demonstrated that netrin-1 is involved in early axon branching, as recombinant netrin-1 halted further advancement of growth cones into the tectum and induced back branching. RGC growth cones exhibited differential responses to netrin-1 that depended on the degree of differentiation of the axon and the developmental stage of the tadpole. Netrin-1 decreased the total number of branches on newly arrived RGC growth cones at the target, but increased the dynamic branching of more mature arbors at the later developmental stage. To further explore the response of axonal growth cones to netrin, Xenopus RGC axons were followed in culture by time-lapse imaging. Exposure to netrin-1 rapidly increased the forward advancement of the axon and decreased the size and expanse of the growth cone, while also inducing back branching. Taken together, the differential in vivo and in vitro responses to netrin-1 suggest that netrin alone is not sufficient to induce the cessation of growth cone advancement in the absence of a target but can independently modulate axon branching. Collectively, our findings reveal a novel role for netrin on RGC axon branch initiation as growth cones innervate their target.     

Semaphorin3A regulates axon growth independently of growth cone repulsion via modulation of TrkA signaling

Regulation of axon growth is a critical event in neuronal development. Nerve growth factor (NGF) is a strong inducer of axon growth and survival in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Paradoxically, high concentrations of NGF are present in the target region where axon growth must slow down for axons to accurately identify their correct targets. Semaphorin3A (Sema3A), a powerful axonal repellent molecule for DRG neurons, is also situated in their target regions. NGF is a modulator of Sema3A-induced repulsion and death. We show that Sema3A is a regulator of NGF-induced neurite outgrowth via the TrkA receptor, independent of its growth cone repulsion activity. First, neurite outgrowth of DRG neurons is more sensitive to Sema3A than repulsion. Second, at concentrations sufficient to significantly inhibit Sema3A-induced repulsion, NGF has no effect on Sema3A-induced axon growth inhibition. Third, Sema3A-induced outgrowth inhibition, but not repulsion activity, is dependent on NGF stimulation. Fourth, Sema3A attenuates TrkA-mediated growth signaling, but not survival signaling, and over-expression of constitutively active TrkA blocks Sema3A-induced axon growth inhibition, suggesting that Sema3A activity is mediated via regulation of NGF/TrkA-induced growth. Finally, quantitative analysis of axon growth in vivo supports the possibility that Sema3A affects axon growth, in addition to its well-documented role in axon guidance. We suggest a model whereby NGF at high concentrations in the target region is important for survival, attraction and inhibition of Sema3A-induced repulsion, while Sema3A inhibits its growth-promoting activity. The combined and cross-modulatory effects of these two signaling molecules ensure the accuracy of the final stages in axon targeting.     

Mechanistic advances in axon pathfinding

The development of a functional nervous system entails establishing connectivity between appropriate synaptic partners. During axonal pathfinding, the developing axon navigates through the extracellular environment, extending toward postsynaptic targets. In the early 1900s, Ramon y Cajal suggested that the growth cone, a specialized, dynamic, and cytoskeletal-rich structure at the tip of the extending axon, is guided by chemical cues in the extracellular environment. A century of work supports this hypothesis and introduced myriad guidance cues and receptors that promote a variety of growth cone behaviors including extension, pause, collapse, retraction, turning, and branching. Here, we highlight research from the last two years regarding pathways implicated in axon pathfinding.     

Cortical axons branch to multiple subcortical targets by interstitial axon budding: implications for target recognition and "waiting periods"

We are studying how axons branch in vivo. Individual cortical neurons send axons to both the spinal cord and the basilar pons. Here we show that the corticopontine projection develops by an interstitial budding of collaterals from parent axons rather than a reported mechanism of axon branching, growth cone bifurcation. This mechanism is used regardless of whether the parent axon's postpontine segment, which forms the corticospinal projection, is permanent (motor cortex) or transient (visual cortex). Budding occurs days after the parent axons grow spinally past the pons, accounting for the "waiting period" reported in this system in contrast to an alternative explanation that the growth cones pause outside of their target. Timing and location of pontine collateral budding vary with cortical origin of the parent axon and are correlated with the temporal ordering of axon arrival.     

Drosophila Eph receptor guides specific axon branches of mushroom body neurons

The conserved Eph receptors and their Ephrin ligands regulate a number of developmental processes, including axon guidance. In contrast to the large vertebrate Eph/Ephrin family, Drosophila has a single Eph receptor and a single Ephrin ligand, both of which are expressed within the developing nervous system. Here, we show that Eph and Ephrin can act as a functional receptor-ligand pair in vivo. Surprisingly, and in contrast to previous results using RNA-interference techniques, embryos completely lacking Eph function show no obvious axon guidance defects. However, Eph/Ephrin signaling is required for proper development of the mushroom body. In wild type, mushroom body neurons bifurcate and extend distinct branches to different target areas. In Eph mutants, these neurons bifurcate normally, but in many cases the dorsal branch fails to project to its appropriate target area. Thus, Eph/Ephrin signaling acts to guide a subset of mushroom body branches to their correct synaptic targets.     

Fine structural characteristics and synaptic connections of trigeminocerebellar projection neurons in rat trigeminal nucleus oralis

In order to classify the presynaptic terminals contacting trigeminocerebellar projection neurons (TCPNs) in rat trigeminal nucleus oralis (Vo), electron-microscopic examination of sequential thin sections made from TCPNs located in the border zone (BZ) of Vo, labeled by the retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase, was undertaken. The use of BZ TCPNs, labeled in Golgi-like fashion so that many of their dendrites and axons were visible, allowed for the determination of the distribution of each bouton type along the soma and dendrites, as well as for the characterization of the morphology and synaptic relations of the labeled axon and its terminals. Three types of axon terminals contacting labeled BZ TCPNs have been recognized, depending upon whether they contain primarily spherical-shaped, agranular synaptic vesicles (S endings); predominantly flattened, agranular synaptic vesicles (F endings); or a population of pleomorphic-shaped, agranular synaptic vesicles (P endings). The S endings represent the majority of axon terminals contacting labeled BZ TCPNs and establish asymmetrical axosomatic and axodendritic synaptic contacts. Many S endings are situated in one of two types of synaptic glomeruli. One type of glomerulus has a large S ending at its core, whereas the other contains a small S ending. Large-S-ending glomeruli include only labeled distal dendrites of BZ TCPNs; small-S-ending glomeruli contain either a labeled soma, proximal dendrite, or distal dendritic shaft. The remaining S endings are extraglomerular, synapsing on distal dendrites. P endings are less frequently encountered and establish intermediate axosomatic and axodendritic synapses. These endings exhibit a generalized distribution along the entire somatodendritic tree. F endings make symmetrical axodendritic synapses with distal dendrites, are only found in glomeruli containing small S endings, and are the least frequently observed ending contacting labeled BZ TCPNs. The majority of axonal endings synapsing on labeled BZ TCPNs are located along distal dendrites, with only a relatively few synapsing terminals situated on proximal dendrites and somata. The axons of labeled BZ TCPNs arise from the cell body and generally give rise to a single short collateral near their points of origin. This collateral remains unbranched and generates several boutons within BZ, while the parent axon acquires a myelin sheath and, without branching further, travels dorsolaterally toward the inferior cerebellar peduncle. The collateral boutons resemble extraglomerular S endings. They contain agranular, spherical-shaped synaptic vesicles and make asymmetrical axodendritic synapses with small-diameter unlabeled dendritic shafts in the BZ neuropil.     

Initial axon growth rate from embryonic sensory neurons is correlated with birth date

Axon growth rate from different populations of sensory neurons is correlated with the distance they have to grow to reach their targets in development: neurons with more distant targets extend axons at intrinsically faster rates. With growth of the embryo, later‐born neurons within each population have further to extend their axons to reach their targets than early‐born neurons. Here we examined whether the axon growth rate is related to birth date by studying the axon growth from neurons that differentiate in vitro from precursor cells isolated throughout the period of neurogenesis. We first showed that neurons that differentiated in vitro from different precursor cell populations exhibited differences in axon growth rate related to in vivo target distance. We then examined the axon growth rate from neurons that differentiate from the same precursor population at different stages throughout the period of neurogenesis. We studied the epibranchial placode precursors that give rise to nodose ganglion neurons in the chicken embryo. We observed a highly significant, threefold difference in axon growth rate from neurons that differentiate from precursor cells cultured early and late during the period of neurogenesis. Our findings suggest that intrinsic differences in axon growth rate are correlated with the neuronal birth date.     

En passant synaptic varicosities form directly from growth cones by transient cessation of growth cone advance but not of actin-based motility.

Formation of terminal synapses at sites such as the neuromuscular junction involves transformation of the motile growth cone into the nonmotile synaptic terminal. However, transformation does not need to be the mechanism when a neurite forms multiple widely spaced synaptic varicosities along a target in an en passant configuration. Synaptic varicosities could form here by specialization of the neurite after the growth cone has advanced past the site. We examined this issue by using cocultures of identified sensory (SN) and motor (L7) neurons from Aplysia. Living SNs were labeled with fluorescent dye and their neurites were observed at high resolution every few minutes growing along the axon of L7, allowing a fine-grained analysis of the behavior of the growth cone at the sites of synapse formation. All varicosities whose formation was observed indeed developed from the growth cone. Sensory varicosities were shown by electron microscopy to contain features characteristic of active zones for transmitter release within a day of their formation on the motor axon. Growth cone advance slowed or stopped transiently during varicosity formation, but the motile activity of the peripheral region of the growth cone (veils and filopodia) was maintained. These results suggest that target "stop signals" involved in the formation of synapses, at least of the en passant variety, may be of a different type from the growth inhibitory molecules, such as the collapsins, which guide axons to their targets.     

The formation of synapses in the central nervous system

Interneuronal synapses are specialized contact zones formed between the transmitting pole of one neuron, usually an axon, and the receptive pole of another nerve cell, usually a dendritic process or the soma. The formation of these synaptic contacts is the result of cellular events related to neurite elongation, the establishment of polarity, axon guidance, and target recognition. A series of morphological rearrangements takes place once synaptic targets establish their initial contact. These changes include the clustering of synaptic vesicles in the presynaptic element and the formation of a specialized area capable of signal transduction at the postsynaptic target. The present review discusses the role of different synaptic proteins in the cellular events leading to the formation of synapses among neurons in the central nervous system.     

Initiating and Growing an Axon

The ability of neurons to form a single axon and multiple dendrites underlies the directional flow of information transfer in the central nervous system. Dendrites and axons are molecularly and functionally distinct domains. Dendrites integrate synaptic inputs, triggering the generation of action potentials at the level of the soma. Action potentials then propagate along the axon, which makes presynaptic contacts onto target cells. This article reviews what is known about the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the ability of neurons to initiate and extend a single axon during development. Remarkably, neurons can polarize to form a single axon, multiple dendrites, and later establish functional synaptic contacts in reductionist in vitro conditions. This approach became, and remains, the dominant model to study axon initiation and growth and has yielded the identification of many molecules that regulate axon formation in vitro ( Dotti et al. 1988). At present, only a few of the genes identified using in vitro approaches have been shown to be required for axon initiation and outgrowth in vivo. In vitro, axon initiation and elongation are largely intrinsic properties of neurons that are established in the absence of relevant extracellular cues. However, the importance of extracellular cues to axon initiation and outgrowth in vivo is emerging as a major theme in neural development ( Barnes and Polleux 2009). In this article, we focus our attention on the extracellular cues and signaling pathways required in vivo for axon initiation and axon extension.     

Molecular targets for therapeutic intervention after spinal cord injury

In an effort to develop therapies for promoting neurological recovery after spinal cord injury, much work has been done to identify the cellular and molecular factors that control axonal regeneration within the injured central nervous system. This review summarizes the current understanding of a number of the elements within the spinal cord environment that inhibit axonal growth and outlines the factors that influence the neuron's ability to regenerate its axon after injury. Recent insights in these areas have identified important molecular pathways that are potential targets for therapeutic intervention, raising hope for victims of spinal cord injury.     

Signaling at the vertebrate synapse: new roles for embryonic morphogens?

The formation of synapses is critical for functional neuronal connectivity. The coordinated assembly at both sides of the synapse is fundamental for the proper apposition of the neurotransmitter release machinery on the presynaptic neuron and the clustering of neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels on the receptive postsynaptic cell. This process requires bidirectional communication between the presynaptic neuron and its postsynaptic target, another neuron, or muscle fiber. Extracellular signals such as WNT, TGF-beta, and FGF factors are emerging as key target-derived signals required for the initial stages of synaptic assembly. Studies in invertebrates are also providing new insights into the function of these signals in synaptic growth and homeostasis. During early embryonic patterning, WNT, TGF-beta, and FGF factors function as typical morphogens in a concentration-dependent manner to regulate cell fate decisions. This mode of action raises the provocative idea that these same morphogens might also provide a coordinate system for axons to establish the distance to their targets during axon guidance and synapse formation.     

Selective fasciculation as a mechanism for the formation of specific chemical connections between Aplysia neurons in vitro

Selective fasciculation of growth cones along preestablished axon pathways expressing matching or complementary adhesion molecules is thought to be an important strategy in axon guidance. Growth cone inhibiting factors also appear to influence pathfinding decisions. We have used identified Aplysia neurons in vitro to explore the hypothesis that similar mechanisms could be involved in target selection. Co-cultures of L10 neurons with RB neuron targets or R2 neurons with RUQ neuron targets reliably formed chemical connections. In contrast, co-cultures of L10 with RUQ targets usually failed to form detectable chemical connections unless cell–cell contact was forced during plating by intertwining the major axons. These data suggested that differences in the ability to form cell–cell contacts might underlie the observed synaptic specificity. This notion was supported when fluorescent dye fills of L10 and R2 revealed a positive correlation between the amount of target contact and the frequency of synapse formation: L10–RUQ cultures showed much less target contact than L10–RB or R2–RUQ cultures. To examine the cellular mechanisms of these differences in target contact, presynaptic growth cones were observed as they interacted with target processes. L10–RUQ cultures showed much less fasciculation and more avoidance behavior compared to L10–RB and R2–RUQ cultures. This initial specificity suggested that the differences in amount of target contact arose through selective fasciculation and avoidance rather than through selective elimination after indiscriminate fasciculation. Selective fasciculation and avoidance might, therefore, aid in target selection by regulating the amount of contact between presynaptic processes and potential target cells. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.