Structural features of the ligand-binding domain of the serotonin 5HT3 receptor

The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and the serotonin type 3 receptor (5HT3R) are members of the ligand-gated ion channel gene family. Both receptors are inhibited by nanomolar concentrations of d-tubocurarine (curare) in a competitive fashion. Chemical labeling studies on the AChR have identified tryptophan residues on the gamma (gammaTrp-55) and delta (deltaTrp-57) subunits that interact with curare. Comparison of the sequences of these two subunits with the 5HT3R shows that a tryptophan residue is found in the homologous position in the 5HT3R (Trp-89), suggesting that this residue may be involved in curare-5HT3R interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis at position Trp-89 markedly reduces the affinity of the 5HT3R for the antagonists curare and granisetron but has little effect on the affinity for the agonist serotonin. To further examine the role of this region of the receptor in ligand-receptor interactions, alanine-scanning mutagenesis analysis of the region centered on Trp-89 (Thr-85 to Trp-94) was carried out, and the ligand binding properties of the mutant receptors were determined. Within this region of the receptor, curare affinity is reduced by substitution only at Trp-89, whereas serotonin affinity is reduced only by substitution at Arg-91. On the other hand, granisetron affinity is reduced by substitutions at Trp-89, Arg-91, and Tyr-93. This differential effect of substitutions on ligand affinity suggests that different ligands may have different points of interaction within the ligand-binding pocket. In addition, the every-other-residue periodicity of the effects on granisetron affinity strongly suggests that this region of the ligand-binding site of the 5HT3R (and by inference, other members of the ligand-gated ion channel family) is in a beta-strand conformation.     

Allosteric conversation in the androgen receptor ligand-binding domain surfaces

Androgen receptor (AR) is a major therapeutic target that plays pivotal roles in prostate cancer (PCa) and androgen insensitivity syndromes. We previously proposed that compounds recruited to ligand-binding domain (LBD) surfaces could regulate AR activity in hormone-refractory PCa and discovered several surface modulators of AR function. Surprisingly, the most effective compounds bound preferentially to a surface of unknown function [binding function 3 (BF-3)] instead of the coactivator-binding site [activation function 2 (AF-2)]. Different BF-3 mutations have been identified in PCa or androgen insensitivity syndrome patients, and they can strongly affect AR activity. Further, comparison of AR x-ray structures with and without bound ligands at BF-3 and AF-2 showed structural coupling between both pockets. Here, we combine experimental evidence and molecular dynamic simulations to investigate whether BF-3 mutations affect AR LBD function and dynamics possibly via allosteric conversation between surface sites. Our data indicate that AF-2 conformation is indeed closely coupled to BF-3 and provide mechanistic proof of their structural interconnection. BF-3 mutations may function as allosteric elicitors, probably shifting the AR LBD conformational ensemble toward conformations that alter AF-2 propensity to reorganize into subpockets that accommodate N-terminal domain and coactivator peptides. The induced conformation may result in either increased or decreased AR activity. Activating BF-3 mutations also favor the formation of another pocket (BF-4) in the vicinity of AF-2 and BF-3, which we also previously identified as a hot spot for a small compound. We discuss the possibility that BF-3 may be a protein-docking site that binds to the N-terminal domain and corepressors. AR surface sites are attractive pharmacological targets to develop allosteric modulators that might be alternative lead compounds for drug design.     

Molecular modeling of the GABAC receptor ligand-binding domain

We have constructed a molecular model of the ligand-binding domain of the GABA(C) receptor, which is a member of the Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channel family. The extracellular domains of these receptors share similar sequence homology (20%) with Limnaea acetylcholine-binding protein for which an X-ray crystal structure is available. We used this structure as a template for homology modeling of the GABA(C) receptor extracellular domain using FUGUE and MODELLER software. FlexX was then used to dock GABA into the receptor ligand-binding site, resulting in three alternative energetically favorable orientations. Residues located no more than 5 A from the docked GABA were identified for each model; of these, three were found to be common to all models with 14 others present only in certain models. Using data from experimental studies, we propose that the most likely orientation of GABA is with its amine close to Y198, and its carboxylate close to R104. These studies have therefore provided a model of the ligand-binding domain, which will be useful for both GABA(C) and GABA(A) receptor studies, and have also yielded an experimentally testable hypothesis of the location of GABA in the binding pocket. [Figure: see text].     

Stargazin promotes closure of the AMPA receptor ligand-binding domain

Transmembrane AMPA receptor (AMPAR) regulatory proteins (TARPs) markedly enhance AMPAR function, altering ligand efficacy and receptor gating kinetics and thereby shaping the postsynaptic response. The structural mechanism underlying TARP effects on gating, however, is unknown. Here we find that the prototypical member of the TARP family, stargazin or γ-2, rescues gating deficits in AMPARs carrying mutations that destabilize the closed-cleft states of the ligand-binding domain (LBD), suggesting that stargazin reverses the effects of these mutations and likely stabilizes closed LBD states. Furthermore, stargazin promotes a more closed conformation of the LBD, as indicated by reduced accessibility to the large antagonist NBQX. Consistent with the functional studies, luminescence resonance energy transfer experiments directly demonstrate that the AMPAR LBD is on average more closed in the presence of stargazin, in both the apo and agonist-bound states. The additional cleft closure and/or stabilization of the more closed-cleft states of the LBD is expected to translate to higher agonist efficacy and could contribute to the structural mechanism for stargazin modulation of AMPAR function.     

Mutational analysis of the ligand-binding domain of the prolactin receptor

The recent isolation and sequencing of the rat liver prolactin (PRL) receptor cDNA (clone F3) revealed that the receptor is a small molecular weight protein (nonglycosylated form, Mr 33,000; glycosylated form, Mr 42,000) comprised of 291 amino acids. A second form of the PRL receptor exists (591 amino acids) that contains a much longer cytoplasmic domain. In the present study, site-directed point mutations of the 5 conserved cysteine (Cys) residues and of the three potential N-linked glycosylation sites in the extracellular domain of the rat PRL receptor were constructed to assess their involvement in hormone binding. In addition, a truncation mutant (T delta 237) lacking 55 of 57 intracellular amino acids was constructed to determine the influence of the cytoplasmic domain on ligand-receptor interactions. Binding studies of transiently transfected COS-7 cells demonstrated that serine substitution of the first 4 Cys residues (Cys12, Cys22, Cys51, and Cys62) completely eliminated binding of 125I-ovine PRL and 125I-U5 and -U6, two monoclonal antibodies that bind the receptor molecule outside the PRL-binding domain. RNA blot analysis of the transfected cells showed that both the wild-type and mutant clones had similar levels of expression of receptor mRNA. Immunoblot analysis demonstrated that lack of PRL binding in these mutants was not due to incomplete processing of the protein, since the fully glycosylated Mr 42,000 form of the receptor was seen. Mutation of Cys184 had no effect on affinity or dimerization capacity of the receptor, suggesting the 5th cysteine is not directly involved in the binding domain. Carbohydrate groups of some receptors have been shown to be involved in ligand-receptor interactions as well as intracellular trafficking. This does not appear to be the case for the PRL receptor, since there was no corresponding decrease in affinity for PRL or cell surface receptor expression, following mutation of each of the 3 asparagine residues to aspartate. Interestingly, T delta 237 showed a 4-5-fold increase in affinity for PRL as well as a marked increase in the number of receptor sites. Whole cell binding assays also demonstrated that loss of the cytoplasmic domain lead to inefficient recycling of the receptor. These studies suggest that the first 4 conserved Cys residues are crucial for ligand binding.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Three-dimensional structural model of the serine receptor ligand-binding domain.

Computer-based homology modeling techniques were used to construct a three-dimensional model of the Escherichia coli serine receptor ligand-binding domain based on the crystal structure of the Salmonella typhimurium aspartate receptor and the sequence homology between the two receptors. Residues that have been found in mutagenesis studies to be necessary for serine binding are located in a proposed serine-binding site. Several other mutations that affect swimming behavior require relatively small shifts in alpha-carbon positions in the model to give a minimized structure, suggesting that small changes in receptor conformation can affect the signaling state of the receptor.     

Folding and stability of the ligand-binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor

A complex pathway involving many molecular chaperones has been proposed for the folding, assembly, and maintenance of a high-affinity ligand-binding form of steroid receptors in vivo, including the glucocorticoid receptor. To better understand this intricate folding and assembly process, we studied the folding of the ligand-binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor in vitro. We found that this domain can be refolded into a compact, highly structured state in vitro in the absence of chaperones. However, the presence of zwitterionic detergent is required to maintain the domain in a soluble form. In this state, the protein is dimeric and has considerable helical structure as shown by far-UV circular dichroism. Further investigation of the properties of this in vitro refolded state show that it is stable and resistant to denaturation by heat or low concentrations of chemical denaturants. A detailed analysis of the unfolding equilibria using three different structural probes demonstrated that this state unfolds via a highly populated dimeric intermediate state. Together, these data clearly show that the ligand-binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor does not require chaperones for folding per se. However, this in vitro refolded state binds the ligand dexamethasone only weakly (K(d) = 45 microM) compared to the in vivo assembled receptor (K(d) = 3.4 nM). We suggest that the role of Hsp90 and associated chaperones is to bind to, and stabilize, a specific conformational state of the receptor which binds ligand with high affinity.     

Conformational changes in the ligand-binding domain of a functional ionotropic glutamate receptor

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer was used to determine the structural changes in the extracellular ligand-binding segment in a functional glutamate receptor that contains the ligand-binding, transmembrane, and C-terminal segments. These studies indicate that the structural changes previously reported for the isolated ligand-binding domain due to the binding of partial and full agonists are also observed in this functional receptor, thus validating the detailed structure-function relationships that have been previously developed based on the structure of the isolated ligand-binding domain. Additionally, these studies provide the first evidence that there are no significant changes in the extent of cleft closure between the activated and desensitized states of the glutamate bound form of the receptor consistent with the previous functional investigations, which suggest that desensitization is mediated primarily by changes in the interactions between subunits composing the receptor.     

Structural aspects of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor

We have determined the three-dimensional structures of both alpha- and beta-forms of the ligand-binding domain of the oestrogen receptor (ER) in complexes with a range of receptor agonists and antagonists. Here, we summarize how these structures provide both an understanding of the ER's distinctive pharmacophore and a rationale for its ability to bind a diverse range of chemically distinct compounds. In addition, these studies provide a unique insight into the mechanisms that underlie receptor activation, as well as providing a structural basis for the antagonist action of molecules, such as raloxifene.     

Molecular dynamics simulations of the ligand-binding domain of an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor

The mechanism of partial agonism at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors is an unresolved issue, especially with respect to the role of protein dynamics. We have performed multiple molecular dynamics simulations (7 x 20 ns) to examine the behavior of the ligand-binding core of the NR1 subunit with a series of ligands. Our results show that water plays an important role in stabilizing different conformations of the core and how a closed cleft conformation of the protein might be stabilized in the absence of ligands. In the case of ligand-bound simulations with both full and partial agonists, we observed that ligands within the binding cleft may undergo distinct conformational changes, without grossly influencing the degree of cleft closure within the ligand-binding domain. In agreement with recently published crystallographic data, we also observe similar changes in backbone torsions corresponding to the hinge region between the two lobes for the partial agonist, D-cycloserine. This observation rationalizes the classification of D-cycloserine as a partial agonist and should provide a basis with which to predict partial agonism in this class of receptor by analyzing the behavior of these torsions with other potential ligands.     

Solution structure of the chick TGFbeta type II receptor ligand-binding domain

The transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) signaling pathway influences cell proliferation, immune responses, and extracellular matrix reorganization throughout the vertebrate life cycle. The signaling cascade is initiated by ligand-binding to its cognate type II receptor. Here, we present the structure of the chick type II TGFbeta receptor determined by solution NMR methods. Distance and angular constraints were derived from 15N and 13C edited NMR experiments. Torsion angle dynamics was used throughout the structure calculations and refinement. The 20 final structures were energy minimized using the generalized Born solvent model. For these 20 structures, the average backbone root-mean-square distance from the average structure is below 0.6A. The overall fold of this 109-residue domain is conserved within the superfamily of these receptors. Chick receptors fully recognize and respond to human TGFbeta ligands despite only 60% identity at the sequence level. Comparison with the human TGFbeta receptor determined by X-ray crystallography reveals different conformations in several regions. Sequence divergence and crystal packing interactions under low pH conditions are likely causes. This solution structure identifies regions were structural changes, however subtle, may occur upon ligand-binding. We also identified two very well conserved molecular surfaces. One was found to bind ligand in the crystallized human TGFbeta3:TGFbeta type II receptor complex. The other, newly identified area can be the interaction site with type I and/or type III receptors of the TGFbeta signaling complex.     

Characterization of the ligand-binding domain of the ecdysteroid receptor from Drosophila melanogaster

Mutants created by site-directed mutagenesis were used to elucidate the function of amino acids involved in ligand binding to ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) and heterodimer formation with ultraspiracle (USP). The results demonstrate the importance of the C-terminal part of the D-domain and helix 12 of EcR for hormone binding. Some amino acids are involved either in ligand binding to EcR (E476, M504, D572, I617, N626) or ligand-dependent heterodimerization as determined by gel mobility shift assays (A612, L615, T619), while others are involved in both functions (K497, E648). Some amino acids are suboptimal for ligand binding (L615, T619), but mediate ligand-dependent dimerization. We conclude that the enhanced regulatory potential by ligand-dependent modulation of dimerization in the wild type is achieved at the expense of optimal ligand binding. Mutation of amino acids (K497, E648) involved in the salt bridge between helix 4 and 12 impair ligand binding to EcR more severely than hormone binding to the heterodimer, indicating that to some extent heterodimerization compensates for the deleterious effect of certain mutations. Different effects of the same point mutations on ligand binding to EcR and EcR/USP (R511, A612, L615, I617, T619, N626) indicate that the ligand-binding pocket is modified by heterodimerization.     

Noncontiguous regions in the extracellular domain of EGF receptor define ligand-binding specificity.

Murine epidermal growth factor (EGF) binds with approximately 250-fold higher binding affinity to the human EGF receptor (EGFR) than to the chicken EGFR. This difference in binding affinity enabled the identification of a major ligand-binding domain for EGF by studying the binding properties of various chicken/human EGFR chimera expressed in transfected cells lacking endogenous EGFR. It was shown that domain III of EGFR is a major ligand-binding region. Here, we analyze the binding properties of novel chicken/human chimera to further delineate the contact sequences in domain III and to assess the role of other regions of EGFR for their contribution to the display of high-affinity EGF binding. The chimeric receptors include chicken EGFR containing domain I of the human EGFR, chicken receptor containing domain I and III of the human EGFR, and two chimeric chicken EGFR containing either the amino terminal or the carboxy terminal halves of domain III of human EGFR, respectively. In addition, the binding of various human-specific anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies that interfere with EGF binding is also compared. It is concluded that noncontiguous regions of the EGFR contribute additively to the binding of EGF. Each of the two halves of domain III has a similar contribution to the binding energy, and the sum of both is close to that of the entire domain III. This suggests that the folding of domain III juxtaposes sequences that together constitute the ligand-binding site. Domain I also provides a contribution to the binding energy, and the added contributions of both domain I and III to the binding energy generate the high-affinity binding site typical of human EGFR.