The role of septal surgery in management of the deviated nose

The deviated nose represents a complex cosmetic and functional problem. Septal surgery plays a central role in the successful management of the externally deviated nose. This study included 260 patients seeking rhinoplasty to correct external nasal deviations; 75 percent of them had various degrees of nasal obstruction. Septal surgery was necessary in 232 patients (89 percent), not only to improve breathing but also to achieve a straight, symmetrical, external nose as well. A graduated surgical approach was adopted to allow correction of the dorsal and caudal deviations of the nasal septum without weakening its structural support to the dorsum or nasal tip. The approach depended on full mobilization of deviated cartilage, followed by straightening of the cartilage and its fixation in the corrected position by using bony splinting grafts through an external rhinoplasty approach.     

Primary definitive nasal correction in patients presenting for late unilateral cleft lip repair

Almost 25 percent of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients present with their deformity in their teens or later years in the developing world. Because more than 80 percent of the world population lives in the developing world, the established protocol for repair of these deformities is not applicable to these patients. Despite the magnitude, there are no significant reports in the literature that deal with this problem. Several issues need to be addressed, but the author limits himself here to the correction of the nasal deformity. The patients at this age are very much concerned with the aesthetic outcome. Procedures described hitherto for primary nasal correction in infants are not successful in restoring nasal shape and symmetry at this late age of presentation. Our experience with radical correction of secondary nasal deformity in unilateral cleft lip patients presenting late prompted us to extend the concept by undertaking a definitive primary correction of the nasal deformity in cleft patients presenting late. Twenty-two patients with unilateral cleft lip deformity (nine male patients and 13 female patients) with ages ranging from 13 to 22 years, presenting between August of 1997 and December of 2000, are included in this study. Of these, 11 patients had a cleft of the lip alone, eight also had a cleft of the alveolus, and three had a cleft of the palate continuous with the cleft lip. All patients showed some maxillary hypoplasia. An external rhinoplasty with lip repair was carried out in all patients. The corrective procedures on the nose included columellar lengthening; augmentation along the pyriform margin, nasal floor, and alveolus using bone grafts; submucous resection of the nasal septum; repositioning of lower lateral cartilages; and augmentation of nasal dorsum by bone graft. Clinical follow-up ranged from 4 to 24 months, and the median follow-up period was 13 months. Results have been very good, and much better than results seen earlier with other primary rhinoplasty techniques. While repairing unilateral cleft lip in adolescents, the author thinks it would be most appropriate to address the entire gamut of the deformity in a single stage, provide complete vector reorientation, and augment the hypoplastic elements by autologous tissue. It is not just the fear of poor follow-up, but that merely correcting the lip deformity in these patients without attempting definitive rhinoplasty, in the author's opinion, would be insufficient surgical intervention.     

Rhinoplasty

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Discuss desired preoperative aesthetic and functional assessment of the postsurgical nose with rhinoplasty patients. 2. Identify factors that have the potential to affect procedural outcomes. 3. Develop an operative plan to address aesthetic goals while preserving/improving nasal airway function. 4. Recognize and manage complications following rhinoplasty. SUMMARY: Rhinoplasty is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic surgical procedures in plastic surgery. Over the past 20 years, the trend has shifted away from ablative techniques involving reduction or division of the osseocartilaginous framework to conserving native anatomy with cartilage-sparing suture techniques and augmentation of deficient areas to correct contour deformities and restore structural support. Accurate preoperative systematic nasal analysis and evaluation of the nasal airway, along with identification of both the patient's expectations and the surgeon's goals, form the foundation for success. Intraoperatively, adequate anatomical exposure of the nasal deformity; preservation and restoration of the normal anatomy; correction of the deformity using incremental control, maintenance, and restoration of the nasal airway; and recognition of the dynamic interplays among the composite of maneuvers are required. During postoperative recovery, care and reassurance combined with an ability to recognize and manage complications lead to successful outcomes following rhinoplasty.     

The deviated nose: optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach

The deviated nose presents a particular challenge to the rhinoplasty surgeon because, frequently, both a functional problem (airway obstruction) and an aesthetic problem must be addressed. An approach to the deviated nose is presented that relies on accurate preoperative planning and precise intraoperative execution of corrective measures to return the nasal dorsum to midline, restore dorsal aesthetic lines, and maintain airway patency. The principles of correction include wide exposure through the open approach, release of all deforming forces to the septum, straightening of the septum while maintaining an adequate dorsal and caudal strut, restoring long-term support, reducing the hypertrophied turbinates, and performing controlled stable percutaneous osteotomies. An operative algorithm is described that emphasizes simplicity and reproducibility, and case studies demonstrate the results that can be achieved with this approach.     

The alar contour graft: correction and prevention of alar rim deformities in rhinoplasty

One of the most common problems affecting both the primary and secondary rhinoplasty patient is deformity of the alar rim. Typically, this deformity is caused by congenital malpositioning, hypoplasia, or surgical weakening of the lateral crura, with the potential for both functional and aesthetic ramifications. Successful correction and prevention of alar rim deformities requires precise preoperative diagnosis and planning. Multiple techniques of varying complexity have been described to treat this common and challenging problem.Over the past 6 years (1994 through 2000), the authors have employed a simple technique in 123 patients for alar retraction that involves the nonanatomic insertion of an autogenous cartilage buttress into an alar-vestibular pocket. Among the 53 patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty in this study, 91 percent experienced correction or prevention of alar notching or collapse. However, correction was achieved for only 73 percent of the patients who underwent secondary rhinoplasty; many of whom had alar retraction secondary to scarring or lining loss. In patients with moderate or significant lining loss or scarring, a lateral crural strut graft is recommended. The alar contour graft provides the foundation in the patient undergoing primary or secondary rhinoplasty for the reestablishment of a normally functioning external nasal valve and an aesthetically pleasing alar contour. This article discusses the anatomic and aesthetic considerations of alar rim deformities and the indications and the surgical technique for the alar contour graft.     

External approach for secondary rhinoplasty

A systematic approach, using the external rhinoplasty technique, is presented to aid the plastic surgeon in obtaining improved aesthetic and functional results in patients with postoperative nasal deformities. In over 100 external rhinoplasties, there were no problems with the stairstep transcolumellar incision used to provide complete visualization of the underlying nasal framework. The external approach allows for a more accurate intraoperative anatomic diagnosis and subsequent complete correction of the nasal deformity. Three case reports are presented to demonstrate the indications and versatility of the external approach in secondary rhinoplasty.     

Radical correction of secondary nasal deformity in unilateral cleft lip patients presenting late

It is universally acknowledged that correction of a cleft lip nasal deformity continues to be a difficult problem. In developing countries, it is common for patients with cleft lip deformities to present in their early or late teens for correction of severe secondary lip and nasal deformities retained after the initial repairs were carried out in infancy or early childhood. Such patients have never had the benefit of primary nasal correction, orthodontic management, or alveolar bone grafting at an appropriate age. Along with a severe nasal deformity, they present with alveolar arch malalignments and anterior fistulae. In the study presented here, a strategy involving a complete single-stage correction of the nasal and secondary lip deformity was used.In this study, 26 patients (nine male and 17 female) ranging in age from 13 to 24 years presented for the first time between June of 1996 and December of 1999 with unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. Eight patients had an anterior fistula (diameter, 2 to 4 mm) and 12 patients had a secondary lip deformity. An external rhinoplasty approach was used for all patients. The corrective procedures carried out in a single stage in these patients included lip revision; columellar lengthening; repair of anterior fistula; augmentation along the pyriform margin, nasal floor, and alveolus by bone grafts; submucous resection of the nasal septum; repositioning of lower lateral cartilages; fixation of the alar cartilage complex to the septum and the upper lateral cartilages; augmentation of nasal dorsum by bone graft; and alar base wedge resections. Medial and lateral nasal osteotomies were performed only if absolutely indicated. The median follow-up period was 11 months, although it ranged from 5 to 25 months. Overall results have been extremely pleasing, satisfactory, and stable.In this age group (13 years of age or older), it is not fruitful to use a technique for nasal correction that corrects only one facet of the deformity, because no result of nasal correction can be satisfactory until septal deviations and maxillary deficiencies are addressed along with any alar repositioning. The results of complete remodeling of the nasal pyramid are also stable in these patients because the patients' growth was nearly complete, and all the deformities could be corrected at the same time, leaving no active deforming vector. These results would indicate that aesthetically good results are achievable even if no primary nasal correction or orthodontic management had been previously attempted.     

Hispanic rhinoplasty in the United States,with emphasis on the Mexican American nose

Because an increasing number of Hispanic patients are seeking nasal surgical treatment, a critical analysis of 25 consecutive Hispanic rhinoplasties was performed. After a review of the patient data and preoperative photographs, a new classification was developed, based on the type of deformity rather than geographical origins (as previously used). A treatment paradigm is offered for each type of deformity. Type I involves a high radix, a high dorsum, and a nearly normal tip and is often referred to as a Castilian nose. Treatment consists of a closed functional reduction rhinoplasty, with dorsal reduction and minor tip changes. Type II involves a low radix, a normal dorsum, and a dependent tip and is a new designation. Treatment consists of a finesse rhinoplasty with a radix graft, minimal dorsal changes, use of a columellar strut for support, and open tip suturing. Type III involves a broad base, thick skin, and a wide tip deformity, with its worst expression in the mestizo nose. Treatment consists of a balanced rhinoplasty with minimal dorsal alteration but maximal lobular reduction and an open-structure tip graft. The following conclusions with respect to Hispanic rhinoplasty in the United States are important: (1) an enormous anatomical diversity of deformities is present, in contrast to Asian and black noses; (2) three distinct types of deformities have been identified, each of which requires a different surgical approach; (3) a wide variety of surgical techniques are necessary, in contrast to other ethnic noses; (4) conservative dorsal reduction is essential for type II and III noses; and (5) limitations imposed by the skin envelope are far less than presupposed, and the results are better than generally recognized. As the Hispanic population grows and becomes more prosperous, plastic surgeons in the United States can expect to encounter an increasing number of Hispanic patients requesting rhinoplasty.     

The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty

In nose surgery, carved or crushed cartilage used as a graft has some disadvantages, chiefly that it may be perceptible through the nasal skin after tissue resolution is complete. To overcome these problems and to obtain a smoother surface, the authors initiated the use of Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage. This innovative technique has been used by the authors on 2365 patients over the past 10 years: in 165 patients with traumatic nasal deformity, in 350 patients with postrhinoplasty deformity, and in 1850 patients during primary rhinoplasty. The highlights of the surgical procedure include harvested cartilage (septal, alar, conchal, and sometimes costal) cut in pieces of 0.5 to 1 mm using a no. 11 blade. The fine-textured cartilage mass is then wrapped in one layer of Surgicel and moistened with an antibiotic (rifamycin). The graft is then molded into a cylindrical form and inserted under the dorsal nasal skin. In the lateral wall and tip of the nose, some overcorrection is performed depending on the type of deformity. When the mucosal stitching is complete, this graft can be externally molded, like plasticine, under the dorsal skin. In cases of mild-to-moderate nasal depression, septal and conchal cartilages are used in the same manner to augment the nasal dorsum with consistently effective and durable results. In cases with more severe defects of the nose, costal cartilage is necessary to correct both the length of the nose and the projection of the columella. In patients with recurrent deviation of the nasal bridge, this technique provided a simple solution to the problem. After overexcision of the dorsal part of deviated septal cartilage and insertion of Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage, a straight nose was obtained in all patients with no recurrence (follow-up of 1 to 10 years). The technique also proved to be highly effective in primary rhinoplasties to camouflage bone irregularities after hump removal in patients with thin nasal skin and/or in cases when excessive hump removal was performed. As a complication, in six patients early postoperative swelling was more than usual. In 16 patients, overcorrection was persistent owing to fibrosis, and in 11 patients resorption was excessive beyond the expected amount. A histologic evaluation was possible in 16 patients, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, by removing thin slices of excess cartilage from the dorsum of the nose during touch-up surgery. This graft showed a mosaic-type alignment of graft cartilage with fibrous tissue connection among the fragments. In conclusion, this type of graft is very easy to apply, because a plasticine-like material is obtained that can be molded with the fingers, giving a smooth surface with desirable form and long-lasting results in all cases. The favorable results obtained by this technique have led the authors to use Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage routinely in all types of rhinoplasty.     

Primary correction of unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity in Asian patients: anthropometric evaluation

Previously it was thought that primary correction of nasal deformity in cleft lip patients would cause developmental impairment of the nose. It is now widely accepted that simultaneous correction of the cleft lip nasal deformity has no adverse effect on nasal growth. Thus, the authors tried to evaluate the results of primary correction of cleft lip in Asian patients. Of 412 cases of cleft lip, 195 cases were corrected by means of the conventional method from June of 1992 to June of 1997, and 217 cases were corrected by simultaneous rhinoplasty from July of 1997 to October of 2001. The average patient age was 3 months. Photographs and anthropometric evaluation were used to evaluate the results. Nasal tip projection, columellar length, and nasal width were measured in 60 randomized normal children, 30 randomized children treated with the conventional method, and 30 randomized children with primary nasal repair. Data were analyzed using t tests, and the level of significance was 5 percent (p < 0.05). In cases of simultaneous repair, nasal tip projection and columellar length were increased 24.8 percent and 28.8 percent, respectively. Nasal width was increased 12.3 percent in the cases of simultaneous repair and 12.6 percent in the cases without primary rhinoplasty. Simultaneous repair of cleft lip and nasal deformity in Asian patients showed that more symmetry of nostril and nasal dome projection and better correction of buckling and alar flaring were achieved. More balanced growth and development of the alar complex was achieved, and no interference with nasal growth was encountered.     

Simultaneous reconstruction of the secondary bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity: Abbé flap revisited

The purpose of this retrospective study was to review the method of using the Abbé flap for correction of secondary bilateral cleft lip deformity in selected patients with tight upper lip, short prolabium, lack of acceptable philtral column and Cupid's bow definition, central vermilion deficiency, irregular lip scars, and associated nasal deformity. A total of 39 patients with the bilateral cleft lip nasal deformity received Abbé flap and simultaneous nasal reconstruction during a period of 6 years. Mean patient age at the time of the operation was 19.1 years, and ranged from 6.6 to 38.5 years. The average follow-up period was 1.8 years. Fourteen patients had prior orthognathic operations. The Abbé flap was designed 13 to 14 mm in length and 8 to 9 mm in width and contained full-thickness tissue from the central lower lip, with a slightly narrow reverse-V caudal end. The prolabium, including the scars and central vermilion, was excised. Lengthening procedures of the upper lip segments were performed if vertical deficiency existed. Part of the prolabial skin was preserved and mobilized for columellar elongation, if indicated. Open rhinoplasty was carried out with or without cartilage graft for columella and nasal tip reconstruction. Reduction of the alar width and nostrils was achieved by a Z-plasty or excision of scar tissue at the nostril floor. The Abbé flap was then transposed cephalad, insetting into the median defect and sutured in layers. The results demonstrated no flap problems or perioperative complications. Seven patients needed further minor revisions on the nose and/or lip. Laser treatment was used to improve the lip scars in three patients. The patients were satisfied with the final outcome and found the lower lip scars acceptable. In conclusion, the described technique of Abbé flap and simultaneous rhinoplasty is an effective reconstructive method for select patients with bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity.     

On rhinomanometry in rhinoplasty

Changes in nasal obstruction, nasal airway resistance, and postoperative nose appearance were evaluated in 92 rhinoplasty patients. Fifty-six patients had a deviation of their nose from the midline preoperatively. They were improved according to rhinomanometry whether the rhinoplasty was combined with a functional septoplasty or with a submucous resection. Among the other 36 patients who did not have a deviation of the nose from the midline, 23 had a rhinoplasty combined with a functional septoplasty and 13 had no surgery on the septum at all. Rhinomanometrically, only patients operated on with the combined operation were improved; the rest became worse, even in terms of nasal obstruction. Among 58 patients from both groups with preoperative nasal obstruction, there was agreement for 76 percent between the subjective and rhinomanometric changes. The advantages of giving the rhinomanometric results in a polar coordinate system are discussed.     

Nasal tip sutures part II: the interplays

The achievement of consistently superior results in rhinoplasty is rendered difficult in part by a number of complex interplays between the anatomical structures of the nose and the techniques used for their alteration, such as tip sutures. The effects of sutures depend largely on the magnitude of suture tightening, the intrinsic forces on the cartilages, cartilage thickness, and the degree of soft-tissue undermining. The tip complex is perhaps the most intricate of the nasal structures, exhibiting subtle but evident responses to manipulations of the lower lateral cartilages. The three-dimensional effects of nine suture techniques that are frequently used in nasal tip surgical procedures are discussed and illustrated. (1) The medial crura suture approximates the medial crura and strengthens the support of the tip. The suture also has effects that are less conspicuous immediately. There is slight narrowing of the columella, caudal protrusion of the lobule, and minimal caudal rotation of the lateral crura. (2) The middle crura suture approximates the most anterior portion of the medial crura. There is greater strengthening of the tip and some approximation of the domes with this suture. (3) The interdomal suture approximates the domes and can equalize asymmetric domes. However, the entire tip may shift to the short side if there is a significant difference in the heights of the domes because of short lateral and medial crura. (4) Transdomal sutures narrow the domal arch while pulling the lateral crura medially. The net results are increased tip projection, alar rim concavity, and the potential need for an alar rim graft. In addition, depending on suture position, cephalic or caudal rotation of the lateral crura may be observed. (5) The lateral crura suture increases the concavity of the lateral crura, reduces the interdomal distance, and may retract the alar rims. Perhaps the most significant inadvertent results of this suture are caudal rotation of the tip and elongation of the nose. This is important because patients who undergo rhinoplasty would often benefit from cephalic, rather than caudal, rotation of the tip. (6) The medial crura-septal suture not only increases tip projection but also rotates the tip cephalically and retracts the columella. (7) The tip rotation suture shifts the tip cephalad while retracting the columella. (8) The medial crura footplate suture approximates the footplates, narrows the columella base, and improves undesirable nostril shape. (9) The lateral crura convexity control suture alters the degree of convexity of the lateral crura. The nuances of these sutures and their multiplanar effects on the nasal tip are discussed.     

Differing characteristics in 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients following closed versus open surgical approaches

Open rhinoplasty has unquestionably become more popular during the past two decades because of the putative diagnostic and technical advantages that direct transcolumellar access offers. To test the hypothesis that patients initially treated by the opened or closed approaches differed in the secondary deformities that developed, a retrospective study was conducted of 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients (66 women and 34 men) operated on by the author before February of 1998. Sixty-four percent had previously undergone closed rhinoplasties and 36 had undergone open rhinoplasties; the incidence of prior open rhinoplasty had increased steadily over the survey years, from 21 percent in 1996 to more than 50 percent in 1998, 1999, and 2000 (p < 0.05). The data generated indicate the following. First, the open rhinoplasty patients had undergone more operations (3.1 versus 1.2) and had more presenting complaints (5.8 versus 2.6) than the closed rhinoplasty patients. Second, although the most common presenting complaint among prior closed rhinoplasty patients was an overresected dorsum (50 percent) or tip (33 percent) or internal valvular obstruction (42 percent), prior open rhinoplasty patients complained more frequently than the closed rhinoplasty patients of these problems and also external valvular obstruction (50 percent, p < 0.0001), short nose (39 percent, p < 0.001), wide columella (36 percent, p < 0.001), narrow nose (31 percent, p < 0.001), columellar scar (25 percent, p < 0.001), and symptomatic columellar struts (19 percent, p < 0.001). Only excessive nasal length was more prevalent among closed rhinoplasty patients (20 percent, p < 0.01). Third, ranking of deformities differed significantly (p < 0.0001) between the two groups, so that complaints related to the nostrils, nasal tip, nasal length, or columella were more common among the open rhinoplasty patients than among those previously treated endonasally. Fourth, the relative frequencies of surgical complaints also differed: whereas patients previously treated endonasally were 6.7 times more likely to complain of long noses, patients previously treated by open rhinoplasty complained more frequently of the following: excessive columellar width (open approach, 36 percent of patients; closed approach, none), hard columellar struts (open approach, 19 percent of patients; closed approach, none), external valvular obstruction (4.5 times as frequent with the open approach as it was with the closed approach), alar/nostril distortion (four times as frequent), and narrow nose (3.9 times). Although the most common complaints among all postrhinoplasty patients remain the overresected dorsum, tip, or (internal valvular) airway obstruction, the author's data suggest that patients previously treated by the open approach are more likely to have postsurgical deformities and complaints referable to those anatomic structures most easily reached by transcolumellar exposure and to techniques that can be performed more readily or aggressively through that access route.     

Asymmetric incision for open rhinoplasty in cleft lip nasal deformity.

One of the problems in the correction of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity is the alar web deformity on the mediosuperior side of the nostril. A number of methods for the correction of the alar web deformity have been introduced, but no single procedure has been identified as the standard. In this report, the incision line of the open rhinoplasty was modified and the alar web deformity was corrected by using an incision and closure. Open rhinoplasty with the asymmetric incision was performed on 18 patients with unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. The incision line used in the normal side was the usual intranasal rim incision line and that used for the columella was the transcolumella incision line. For the cleft side, an intranasal rim incision line was plotted after the rim was lifted upward with forceps to achieve symmetry of the nasal tip. After removal of the forceps, the incision line of the cleft side was displaced outside the nostril. After such an incision, the alar cartilage mobilization and suspension were performed with or without the conchal cartilage graft. All patients used nasal retainers for 6 months after the procedures. So far, satisfactory results have been obtained with the modification of the incision line for open rhinoplasty. This method is unique in designing the incision line, and its procedure is rather simple. The postoperative follow-up period has been 12 to 26 months. A long-term follow-up is still needed, especially in growing children.     

Onlay cartilage graft of the alar lateral crus for cleft lip nasal deformities

The onlay cartilage grafting technique is described for treatment of unilateral or bilateral cleft lip nasal deformities. The alar cartilage is exposed through rim and intercartilagenous incisions. The cephalic half of the alar cartilage is excised, similar to the technique of traditional tip rhinoplasty. The harvested cartilage is applied to the intact caudal cartilage in layered fashion and secured with absorbable sutures. If necessary, successive layers may be added. These grafts provide a sturdy, yet delicate framework for a more normal appearing alar rim. We have performed this procedure on 16 patients, ages 10 to 41. Follow-up intervals range from 13 to 40 months, with a mean of 19 months. Results have been rated good-to-excellent by patients and surgeons. There has been no recurrence of the deformity. The only complication has been one nasal vestibule synechia.     

Supratip deformity: a closer look

Supratip deformity, a hallmark of a poorly executed rhinoplasty or an inauspicious healing, continues to plague the novice often and the experts on occasion. A clinical and histopathologic study was conducted to search for the surgical causes of this deformity and its histologic presentation. An organized, logical management program was then developed. Clinically, supratip fullness was observed in both primary (26 of 298 patients; 9 percent) and secondary (40 of 112 patients; 36 percent) rhinoplasty candidates. In primary patients, the deformity was the result of inadequate tip projection (pseudodeformity), an overprojected caudal dorsum, a combination of both, or cephalically oriented lower lateral cartilages. In secondary patients, the deformity was caused by an underresected or overresected caudal dorsum, overresected midvault, underprojected tip (pseudodeformity), or a combination of some of these factors. The histopathologic evaluation demonstrated significant fibrosis in the supratip soft tissue of 14 of 16 patients undergoing secondary rhinoplasty without the injection of triamcinolone acetonide and in only 13 of 23 patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty (p<0.05). A supratip deformity can be eschewed by proper resection of the caudal dorsum, avoidance of dead space, restoration of adequate projection to the nasal tip, and an approximation of the supratip subcutaneous tissue to the underlying cartilage using a supratip suture, hence eliminating the dead space. If the problem is noted shortly after surgery, in the presence of collapsible consistency of the supratip tissue and adequate projection, the treatment is taping the supratip tissue as often as it is practical. If no favorable response is elicited in 6 to 8 weeks, thejudicious injection of a small amount of triamcinolone acetonide (0.2 to 0.4 cc of 20 mg/cc) in the deep subcutaneous tissue (not in the dermis) is done. The injection is repeated in 4-week intervals until the desired effect is achieved. If supratip fullness is the consequence of inadequate cartilage resection or inadequate tip projection, surgical correction is needed. The recalcitrant soft-tissue excess in the supratip area is resected, and the subcutaneous soft tissue is approximated to the underlying cartilage. If the dorsum was previously overresected, a cartilage graft to the caudal dorsum or midvault will create an optimal dorsal frame and reduce the potential for a recurrent supratip deformity.     

Nasal augmentation with Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage: a review of 67 consecutive cases

Cartilage grafting has been used extensively to correct both the functional and aesthetic aspects of the nasal framework. The technique described by Erol ( 105: 2229, 2000) uses Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasties. The advantages include its ease of preparation, the large volume of graft substrate available for use, and the avoidance of contour irregularities in the areas of placement. A retrospective case review of 67 consecutive patients who were treated with a Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage graft as part of an aesthetic and/or functional rhinoplasty, in a 5-year period between 1995 and 2000, was performed in this study. All cases of congenital nasal deformities or deformities caused by trauma or tumors in which the technique was used were excluded. The charts were reviewed to determine demographic variables, the surgical procedures performed, prior operations, the rhinoplasty approach used, and the graft donor and recipient sites. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were examined, and the results were assessed. Data on the donor and recipient sites, complications, and the necessity for revisionary procedures were tabulated. There were two complications, namely, an infection, which resolved with aspiration and oral antibiotic therapy, and a recurrence of a dorsal depression, which necessitated repeated augmentation within 6 months. The technique of using Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage proved to be effective for the augmentation of various areas of the nose. The complication and revision rates were acceptable and comparable to those of other techniques. Patient satisfaction with the aesthetic results was rated highly, with no reports of graft extrusion or contour irregularities. This technique is recommended for nasal augmentation and contouring for selected rhinoplasty patients.     

A fresh look at the open rhinoplasty technique

Use of the open rhinoplasty technique (ORT) in certain nasal and septal deformities has proven to be an invaluable asset in the rhinoplasty armamentarium of the authors. Primarily owing to the markedly increased exposure with this technique, more accurate assessment of the deformities is possible and additional or improved surgical maneuvers become available, particularly in the tip. Sculpting the entire cartilaginous and/or bony vault, as well as correcting difficult septal malalignments, can be carried out under better direct vision with greater precision, accuracy, and predictability. This has led to improved and more consistent final results. Previous criticisms of unsightly columellar scars have been virtually eliminated through the use of improved surgical techniques and simple magnification. Overall, open rhinoplasty technique can provide many distinct advantages in certain nasal deformities with no real disadvantages over conventional closed techniques.